請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/91523完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 梁卓誠 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Cheuk-Shing Leung | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 姜曉彥 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | XIAO-YAN JIANG | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-01-28T16:22:48Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2024-01-29 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2024-01-27 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2023 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2023-08-11 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Alesina, A., Ichino, A., & Karabarbounis, L. (2011). Gender based taxation and the division of family chores. Journal of European Economic Association, 9(3), 394-418.
Apps, P., & Rees, R. (2012). Optimal tax progressivity: An international perspective. Journal of Public Economics, 96(3-4), 293-304. Bakış, O., Kaymak, B., & Poschke, M. (2015). Optimal income taxation with household production. Journal of Monetary Economics, 72, 111-129. Benabou, R. (2000). Unequal societies: Income distribution and the social contract. American Economic Review, 90(1), 96-129. Benabou, R. (2002). Tax and education policy in a heterogeneous-agent economy: What levels of redistribution maximize growth and efficiency? Econometrica, 70(2), 481-517. Blundell, R., Pistaferri, L., & Saporta-Eksten, I. (2016). Children, time allocation, and consumption insurance. American Economic Review, 106(4), 932-985. Borella, M., Nardi, M., & Yang, F. (2017). The role of family in family firms. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 142, 410-421. Corneo, G. (2002). The efficient side of progressive income taxation. European Economic Review, 46(7), 1359-1368. Diamond, P. A., & Saez, E. (2011). The case for a progressive tax: From basic research to policy recommendations. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 25(4), 165-190. Eissa, N., & Hoynes, H. (2004). Taxes and the labor market participation of married couples: The earned income tax credit. Journal of Public Economics, 88(9-10), 1931-1958. Feldstein, M. S. (1969). Progressive taxation and the rate of saving. Journal of Political Economy, 77(4), 293-316. Gayle, G. L., & Shephard, A. (2016). Optimal taxation, marriage, home production, and family labor supply. Journal of Monetary Economics, 84, 143-163. Guner, N., Kaygusuz, R., & Ventura, G. (2014). Income taxation of US households: Facts and parametric estimates. Review of Economic Dynamics, 17(4), 559-581. Heathcote, J., Perri, F., & Violante, G. L. (2010). Unequal we stand: An empirical analysis of economic inequality in the United States, 1967-2006. Review of Economic Dynamics, 13(1), 15-51. Holter, H. A., Krueger, D., & Stepanchuk, S. (2017). How do tax progressivity and household heterogeneity affect Laffer curves? Journal of Monetary Economics, 89, 1-20. Kakwani, N. C. (1977). Applications of Lorenz curves in economic analysis. Econometrica, 45(3), 719-727. Kleven, H. J. (2014). How can Scandinavians tax so much? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 28(4), 77-98. Meghir, C., & Phillips, D. (2010). Labour supply and taxes. International Tax and Public Finance, 17(4), 383-410. Ohtake, F., & Saito, M. (1998). Population aging and consumption inequality in Japan. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 12(4), 444-469. Persson, T. (1983). A tax on labor income. Econometrica, 51(6), 1637-1654. Piketty, T., & Saez, E. (2007). How progressive is the US federal tax system? A historical and international perspective. Journal of Economic perspectives, 21(1), 3-24. Saez, E. (2002). Optimal income transfer programs: Intensive versus extensive labor supply responses. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(3), 1039-1073. U.S. Department of the Treasury. (1998). Report on Joint Liability and Innocent Spouse Issues. Retrieved from https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/131/Report-Joint-LiabiliT-Innocent-Spouse-1998.pdf 行政院主計總處(2022)。103-110年家戶收支調查(AA170046)【原始數據】取自中央研究院人文社會科學研究中心調查研究專題中心學術調查研究資料庫。https://doi.org/10.6141/TW-SRDA-AA170046-1 全國法規資料庫. (2022). 取自 https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawSingleRela.aspx?media=print&PCODE=G0340003&FLNO=15&T=J 國稅局. (2014). 稅務法規. 取自 https://www.etax.nat.gov.tw/etwmain/tax-info/understanding/tax-saving-secret/GYvNwBz 財政部中區國稅局. (2022). 取自https://www.ntbca.gov.tw/etwmain/web/ETW118W/CON/911/6870683220803151809 財政部財政資訊中心. (2023). 103-110年度綜合所得稅申報核定統計專冊. 中華民國財政部. | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/91523 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本文以家戶異質性與租稅影響為研究重點,首先對不同家戶結構所關聯的不同所得稅效應進行了實證研究,然後分析了對家戶異質性有所考量的所得稅政策。本文在實證研究和政策分析兩方面都在一定程度上填補了台灣在該議題上的研究空白。本研究採用了台灣中央研究院提供的「家庭收支調查」數據。數據中的樣本根據家戶類型代碼表分為兩組:單身家戶和已婚家戶,以探討單身家戶與已婚家戶面臨的所得稅影響差異。本文先後采用了多元線性回歸和非線性最小二乘法來估計參數 λ 和 τ。λ 用於確定一個經濟體的平均稅收水平。 τ 則描述累進狀況。這兩個參數一起決定了所得稅的性質和轉移支付框架。最終結果表明,所得稅對所有家戶結構都是累進的,稅收政策具有再分配效果。以非線性模型結果來説:在同等收入水平下,已婚家戶面臨的累進稅率更高,但他們的稅後收入可能高於單身家戶。為了進一步補充上述結果並反映現實,本文詳細介紹了台灣 「分開申報政策 」的實施情況,並將其與美國的制度進行了比較,對比了兩種制度的總體統計參數。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | This paper focuses on household heterogeneity and tax impact, initially conducting an empirical study on the different income tax effects associated with various household structures, then analyzing income tax policies that consider household heterogeneity. To a certain extent, this paper fills the research gap in Taiwan on this topic, both in terms of empirical research and policy analysis. This research utilizes data from the 「Survey of Family Income and Expenditure」 provided by Academia Sinica of Taiwan. The sample in the data was categorized into two groups based on the family Type codebook: single households and married households, to explore the differences in income tax impact faced by single households versus married households. This paper employs both multiple linear regression and nonlinear least squares methods to estimate the two parameters λ and τ. λ is to determine the average level of taxation in an economy. τ describes the progressivity status. The two parameters define the nature of income tax and the transfer schedule. The final results indicate that income tax is progressive for all household structures, and the tax policy has redistributive effects. Regarding the results of the nonlinear model: at equivalent income levels, married households face a more progressive tax rate, yet they possibly have higher after-tax income than single households. To further supplement the above results and reflect reality, this paper provides a detailed account of the implementation of the 「separating filing policy」 in Taiwan, compares it with the system in the United States, and contrasts the macro statistical parameters of the two systems. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2024-01-28T16:22:48Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2024-01-28T16:22:48Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 誌謝 II
摘要 III ABSTRACT IV 目錄 VI 圖目錄 VII 表目錄 VII 第一章 緒論 1 1. 研究動機 1 2. 文獻回顧 2 第二章 模型與分析 5 1. 樣本 5 2. 線性估計模型 6 3. 非線性模型 8 4. 實證結果 11 第三章 政策分析 12 1. 台灣夫妻分開申報政策 12 2. 台灣對比美國——夫妻所得申報政策 14 3. 台灣對比美國——總體參數 16 第四章 結論 18 參考文獻 20 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.subject | 非線性最小二乘法 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 家戶異質性 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 多元線性回歸 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 所得稅 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 夫妻分開申報政策 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Separating Filing Policy | en |
| dc.subject | Income Tax | en |
| dc.subject | Household Heterogeneity | en |
| dc.subject | Multivariate Linear Regression | en |
| dc.subject | Nonlinear Least Squares | en |
| dc.title | 台灣異質性家戶結構所得稅影響差異之實證研究與政策分析 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | An Empirical Study on the Tax Impact Differences among Heterogenous Household and an Analysis of Filing Policy in Taiwan | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 111-2 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 朱玉琦;鄭浩祥 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Yu-Chi Chu;Ho-Cheung Cheng | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 所得稅,家戶異質性,多元線性回歸,非線性最小二乘法,夫妻分開申報政策, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Income Tax,Household Heterogeneity,Multivariate Linear Regression,Nonlinear Least Squares,Separating Filing Policy, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 22 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202303549 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(限校園內公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2023-08-11 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 經濟學系 | - |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2028-08-08 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 經濟學系 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-111-2.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 1.01 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
