請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/91358完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 林維真 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Weijane Lin | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 石媛菱 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Yuan-Ling Shih | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-01-12T16:10:47Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2024-01-13 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2024-01-12 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2023 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2023-08-07 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | 王啟祥(2012)。評《博物館觀眾研究》。博物館與文化,4,197-204。
王啟祥(2008)。國內博物館家庭觀眾研究的現況與展望。科技博物,12(4),5-24。 李雯淳、翁菁邑、林均霈(2012)。數位博物館發展歷程。在徐典裕、江沛航、陳秀華、褚如君、李雯淳、翁菁邑、林均霈,全方位數位博物館建置(頁12-42)。數位典藏與數位學習國家型科技計畫、拓展台灣數位典藏計畫。 林玟伶(2020)。新科技媒體發展下博物館、觀眾與組織變革。博物館與文化,(20),39-55。 林維真(2020)。博物館觀眾研究。台大校友雙月刊,132,9-13. 侯孟秀(2018)。運用指數隨機圖模型探討不同性質虛擬社群之社會交換網絡:以批踢踢實業坊為例[未出版之碩士論文,國立臺灣大學]。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU201800067 胡德佳(2012)。圖書資訊學領域電子書研究之趨勢分析 [碩士論文,國立臺灣大學]。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2012.00833 陳秀華(2012)。全方位數位博物館創新科技應用。在徐典裕、江沛航、陳秀華、褚如君、李雯淳、翁菁邑、林均霈,全方位數位博物館建置(頁12-42)。數位典藏與數位學習國家型科技計畫、拓展台灣數位典藏計畫。 劉婉珍(2011)。博物館觀眾研究。三民書局。 蔡明月、劉瓊芳(2007)。1992-2005 資訊計量學研究及其發展演變。圖書與資訊學刊,(61),42-56。https://doi.org/10.6575/JoLIS.2007.61.04 蔡欣倫(2018)。文獻計量法可視化分析:探索博物館教育之發展現況。科學與人文研究,5(4),188-206。 Albanese, M., Chianese, A., d’Acierno, A., Moscato, V., & Picariello, A. (2010). A multimedia recommender integrating object features and user behavior. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 50(3), 563-585. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-010-0480-8 Alviz-Meza, A., Vásquez-Coronado, M. H., Delgado-Caramutti, J. G., & Blanco-Victorio, D. J. (2022). Bibliometric analysis of fourth industrial revolution applied to heritage studies based on web of science and scopus databases from 2016 to 2021. Heritage Science, 10, Article 189. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-022-00821-3 Bar-Ilan, J. (2008). Informetrics at the beginning of the 21st century—A review. Journal of Informetrics, 2(1), 1-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2007.11.001 Barbieri, L., Bruno, F., & Muzzupappa, M. (2017). Virtual museum system evaluation through user studies. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 26, 101-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2017.02.005 Bastian, M., Heymann, S., & Jacomy, M. (2009). Gephi: an open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 3(1), 361-362. https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/ICWSM/article/view/13937/13786 Bedi, P., & Sharma, C. (2016). Community detection in social networks. WIREs Data Mining Knowledge Discovery, 6(3), 115-135. https://doi.org/10.1002/widm.1178 Boast, R., Bravo, M., & Srinivasan, R. (2007). Return to Babel: Emergent Diversity, Digital Resources, and Local Knowledge. The Information Society, 23(5), 395-403. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972240701575635 Boboc, R. G., Băutu, E., Gîrbacia, F. Popovici, N., & Popovici, D. M. (2022). Augmented reality in cultural heritage: An overview of the last decade of applications. Applied Sciences, 12(19), Article 9859. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12199859 Bolchini, D., & Mylopoulos, J. (2003). From task-oriented to goal-oriented web requirements analysis. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Web Information Systems Engineering, WISE 2003 (pp. 166-175). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/WISE.2003.1254480 Bollo, A. & dal Pozzolo, L. (2015). Analysis of visitor behaviour inside the magna science centre: An empirical study. In Proceedings of the 8th international conference on arts and cultural management (pp. 1-13). AIMAC. Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Johnson, J. C. (2018). Analyzing social networks (2rd ed.). SAGE. Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Freeman, L. (2012). UCINET 6 for Windows: Software for social network analysis-User’s guide. UCINET SOFTWARE. https://sites.google.com/site/ucinetsoftware/how-to-use?authuser=0 Börner, K., Chen, C., & Boyack, K. W. (2003). Visualizing knowledge domains. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 37(1), 179-255. https://doi.org/10.1002/aris.1440370106 Bowen, J. P. (1997, March 16-19). The virtual library museums pages (VLmp): Whence and whither? [Paper presentation]. Museums and the Web 1997, Los Angeles, CA, United States. Bowen, J. P. (1999, March 11-14). Time for renovations: A survey of museum web sites [Paper presentation]. Museums and the Web 1999, New Orleans, LA, USA. Bozdoğan, K. (2020). A bibliometric analysis of educational studies about “museum education”. Participatory Educational Research, 7(3), 161-179. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.20.40.7.3 Bretas, V. P. G., & Alon, I. (2021). Franchising research on emerging markets: Bibliometric and content analyses. Journal of Business Research, 133, 51-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.067 Chadwick, J. C., & Boverie, P. (1999, March 11-14). A survey of characteristics and patterns of behavior in visitors to a museum web site. Museums and the Web 1999, New Orleans, LA, USA. https://www.archimuse.com/mw99/papers/chadwick/chadwick.html Clarivate. (n.d.). Web of Science. https://clarivate.com/zh-hant/solutions/web-of-science/ Danesh, F. (2021). Knowledge organization discovering & visualizing prominent patterns, hidden relationships & subjects trends. Iranian Journal of Information Processing and Management, 36(2), 469-500. Elsevier. (n.d.-a). About Scopus. https://www.elsevier.com/solutions/scopus?dgcid=RN_AGCM_Sourced_300005030 Elsevier. (n.d.-b). The fact sheet. https://www.elsevier.com/__data/assets/pdf_file/0017/114533/Scopus-fact-sheet-2022_WEB.pdf Evrard, Y., & Krebs, A. (2018). The authenticity of the museum experience in the digital age: The case of the Louvre. Journal of Cultural Economics, 42, 353-363. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10824-017-9309-x Falk, J. H. & Dierking, L. D. (2000). Learning from museums : visitor experiences and the making of meaning. AltaMira Press. Fantoni, S. F., Stein, R., & Bowman, G. (2012). Exploring the relationship between visitor motivation and engagement in online museum audiences [Paper Presentation]. Museums and the Web 2012, San Diego, CA, United State. https://www.museumsandtheweb.com/mw2012/papers/exploring_the_relationship_between_visitor_mot.html Goldman, K. H., Schaller, D. T., & Adventures, E. W. (2004). Exploring motivational factors and visitor satisfaction in on-line museum visits [Paper Presentation]. Museums and the Web 2004, San Francisco, CA. https://www.museumsandtheweb.com/mw2004/papers/haleyGoldman/haleyGoldman.html Gong, W., & Xiao, B. (2021). Research on Factors Influencing Users’ Technology Acceptance of Virtual Museums. In Culture and Computing. Interactive Cultural Heritage and Arts (pp. 374-388). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77411-0_24 Hazan, S., Hermon, S., Turra, R., Pedrazzi, G., Franchi, M., Wallergard, M. (2014). Theory design – Update on D3.1. Virtual Museum Transnational Project (V-MUST.NET). http://www.v-must.net/sites/default/files/D3.1_update.pdf Hertzum, M. (1998). A review of museum web sites: In search of user-centred design. Archives and Museum Informatics: Cultural Heritage Informatics Quarterly, 12(2), 127-138. Hooper-Greenhill, E. (2006). Studying visitors. In MacDonald, S. (Ed.), A companion to museum studies (pp. 362-376). https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470996836.ch22 Huang, F., Wang, L., & Jia, H. (2021). Research trends for papillary thyroid carcinoma from 2010 to 2019: A systematic review and bibliometrics analysis. Medicine, 100(21), e26100. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000026100 Huang, H. Y., & Liem, C. C. S. (2022). Social inclusion in curated contexts: Insights from museum practices. In FAccT '22: Proceedings of the 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (pp. 300-309). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3531146.3533095 Huang, L. & Lv, N. (2021). Design and implementation of digital museum system based on AR-VR hybrid technology. In S. F. Zhang & H. L. Wang (Chairs), Proceedings of 2021 4th International Conference on Information Systems and Computer Aided Education (ICISCAE’21) (pp. 2675-2679). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3482632.3487493 Kelly, L., & RUSSO, A. (2008). From Ladders of Participation to Networks of Participation [Paper presentation]. Museums and the Web 2008, Québec, Canada. https://www.museumsandtheweb.com/mw2008/papers/kelly_l/kelly_l.html Kemp, S. (2022, July 21). Digital 2022: July global statshot report. DataReportal. https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2022-july-global-statshot Kim, S., & Lee, H. (2016). Visitor attention and communication in information-based exhibitions. International Journal of Design, 10(2), 15-30. Lanir, J., Kuflik, T., Sheidin, J., Yavin, N., Leiderman, K., & Segal, M. (2017). Visualizing museum visitors’ behavior: Where do they go and what do they do there? Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 21(2), 313-326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-016-0994-9 Liu, S., Yang, Y., & Shafi, M. (2019, August). A Study of Museum Experience Evaluation from the Perspective of Visitors’ Behavior. In Xu, J., Ahmed, S.E., Cooke, F.L., & Duca, G. (Eds.), International Conference on Management Science and Engineering Management (pp. 683-693). Springer. López, X., Margapoti, I., Maragliano, R., & Bove, G. (2010). The presence of Web 2.0 tools on museum websites: a comparative study between England, France, Spain, Italy, and the USA. Museum Management and Curatorship, 25(2), 235-249. https://doi.org/10.1080/09647771003737356 Luo, F., Dai, X., & Huang, Y. (2021). The analysis of evolutionary path of research topics on the field of visualization of international cultural heritage information since the 21st century. In M. Anpo & F. Song (Eds.), E3S Web of Conferences: Vol. 236. 3rd International Conference on Energy Resources and Sustainable Development (ICERSD 2020) (Article 05074). EDP Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202123605074 Maltseva, D., & Batagelj, V. (2020). Towards a systematic description of the field using keywords analysis: Main topics in social networks. Scientometrics, 123(1), 357-382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03365-0 Martínez-Vázquez, R. M., Milán-García, J., & de Pablo Valenciano, J. (2021). Challenges of the blue economy: Evidence and research trends. Environmental Sciences Europe, 33(1), Article 61 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-021-00502-1 Marty, P. F. (2007). Museum Websites and Museum Visitors: Before and After the Museum Visit. Museum Management and Curatorship, 22(4), 337-360. https://doi.org/10.1080/09647770701757708 Marty, P. F. (2008). Museum websites and museum visitors: digital museum resources and their use. Museum Management and Curatorship, 23(1), 89-99. https://doi.org/10.1080/09647770701865410 Marty, P. F., Rayward, W. B., & Twidale, M. B. (2005). Museum Infomatics. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 37(1), 259-294. https://doi.org/10.1002/aris.1440370107 Maruta, M., Sano, Y., Yamaguchi, K., & Mine, T. (2015, July). Visitor Behavior Analysis Based on Large-Scale Wi-Fi Location Data. In Hashimoto, K., Mine, T., Matsuo, T., & Hirokawa, S. (Eds.), 2015 IIAI 4th International Congress on Advanced Applied Informatics (pp. 55-60). IEEE. McManus, P. M. (1987). Communication with and between visitors to a science museum [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of London. Micoli, L. L., Caruso, G., & Guidi, G. (2020). Design of Digital Interaction for Complex Museum Collections. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/mti4020031 Miyazaki, D., Hara, K., & Ikeuchi, K. (2010). Median Photometric Stereo as Applied to the Segonko Tumulus and Museum Objects. International Journal of Computer Vision, 86(2-3), 229-242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11263-009-0262-9 Monteagudo-Fernández, J., Gómez-Carrasco, C.J., & Chaparro-Sainz, Á. (2021). Heritage education and research in museums. Conceptual, intellectual and social structure within a knowledge domain (2000–2019). Sustainability, 13(12), Article 6667. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13126667 Münster, S. (2019). Digital heritage as a scholarly field—Topics, researchers, and perspectives from a bibliometric point of view. Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage, 12(3), Article 22. https://doi.org/10.1145/3310012 Negri, M. (2012). Virtual museums – A shift in meaning. In A. Nicholls, M. Pereira & M. Sani (Eds.), Report 1 – The virtual museum (the learning museum network project (pp. 12-19). Istituto per i Beni Artistici Culturali e Naturali. Nicholls, A., Pereira, M., & Sani, M. (Eds.). Report 1 – The virtual museum (the learning museum network project. Istituto per i Beni Artistici Culturali e Naturali. Norouzi, M., Chàfer, M., Cabeza, L. F., Jiménez, L., & Boer, D. (2021). Circular economy in the building and construction sector: A scientific evolution analysis. Journal of Building Engineering, 44, Article 102704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102704 Ovallos-Gazabon, D., Meléndez-Pertuz, F., Collazos-Morales, C., Zamora-Musa, R., Cardenas, C. A., & González, R. E. R. (2020). Innovation, technology and user Experience in museums: Insights from scientific literature. In O. Gervasi, B. Murgante, S. Misra, C. Garau, I. Blečić, D. Taniar, B. O. Apduhan, A. M. A.C. Rocha, E. Tarantino, C. M. Torre, & Y. Karaca (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Computer Science: Vol. 12249. Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2020 (pp. 819-832). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58799-4_59 Pallud, J., & Straub, D. W. (2014). Effective website design for experience-influenced environments: The case of high culture museums. Information & Management, 51(3), 359-373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2014.02.010 Palumbo, R. (2022). Enhancing museums' attractiveness through digitization: An investigation of Italian medium and large-sized museums and cultural institutions. International Journal of Tourism Research, 24(2), 202-215. https://doi.org/10.1002/jtr.2494 Papić, A. (2017, May 22-26). Informetrics: The development, conditions and perspectives [Paper presentation]. MIPRO 2017, Opatija, Croatia. Parry, R. & Sawyer, A. (2005). Space and the machine: Adaptive museums, pervasive technology and the new gallery environment. In S. Macleod (Ed), Reshaping museum space (pp. 39-52). Routledge. Peacock, D. & Brownbill, J. (2007). Audiences, visitors, users: Reconceptualising users of museum on-line content and services [Paper presentation]. Museums and the Web 2007, San Francisco, CA, United State. https://www.museumsandtheweb.com/mw2007/papers/peacock/peacock.html Pietroni, E., Pagano, A., & Fanini, B. (2018). UX Designer and Software Developer at the Mirror: Assessing Sensory Immersion and Emotional Involvement in Virtual Museums. Studies in Digital Heritage, 2(1), 13-41. https://doi.org/10.14434/sdh.v2i1.24634 Polycarpou, C. (2018, January 10). The VIMM definition of a virtual museum. Virtual Multimodal Museum. https://www.vi-mm.eu/2018/01/10/the-vimm-definition-of-a-virtual-museum/ Povroznik, N. (2018). Virtual museums and cultural heritage: Challenges and solutions. In E. Mäkelä, M. Tolonen, & J. Tuominen (Eds.), CEUR Workshop Proceedings: Vol. 2084. Proceedings of the Digital Humanities in the Nordic Countries 3rd Conference (pp. 394-402). Radhakrishnan, S., Erbis, S., Isaacs, J. A., & Kamarthi, S. (2017). Novel keyword co-occurrence network-based methods to foster systematic reviews of scientific literature. PLoS One, 12(3), e0172778. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172778 Rashed, M. G., Suzuki, R., Yonezawa, T., Lam, A., Kobayashi, Y., & Kuno, Y. (2016, August). Tracking visitors in a real museum for behavioral analysis. In O’Conner, L. (Ed), 2016 Joint 8th International Conference on Soft Computing and Intelligent Systems (SCIS) and 17th International Symposium on Advanced Intelligent Systems (ISIS) (pp. 80-85). IEEE. Rellie, J. (2004, March 30 - April 3). One site fits all: Balancing priorities at Tate Online [Paper presentation]. Museums and the Web 2004, Arlington, VA, United States. https://www.museumsandtheweb.com/mw2004/papers/rellie/rellie.html Reussner, E. M. (2008). Learning from the best: Succcess factors for effective audience research. In H. Kraeutler (Ed.), Heritage learning matters: Museums and universal heritage (pp. 186-197). Holzhausen. Rocha, R. G., & Pinheiro, P. G. (2021). Organizational spirituality: Concept and perspectives. Journal Business Ethics 171(2), 241-252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04463-y Roederer, C., Revat, R., & Pallud, J. (2020). Does digital mediation really change the museum experience? Museomix in the Lyon-Fourviere Archaeological Museum. International Journal of Arts Management, 22(3), 108-123. Ruiz-Rosero, J., Ramirez-Gonzalez, G., & Viveros-Delgado, J. (2019). Software survey: ScientoPy, a scientometric tool for topics trend analysis in scientific publications. Scientometrics, 121(2), 1165–1188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03213-w Schweibenz, W. (2004). The development of virtual museums. ICOM News, 57(3). Schweibenz, W. (2013). Museum exhibitions - The real and the virtual ones: An account of a complex relationship. Uncommon Culture, 3(5/6), 38–52. https://uncommonculture.org/ojs/index.php/UC/article/view/4715 Schweibenz, W. (2019). The virtual museum: An overview of its origins, concepts, and terminology. The Museum Review, 4(1). https://www.themuseumreview.org/ Schweibenz, W., & Wintzerith, S. (2018). The personas method: A tool for communicating data from visitor studies. Museologica Brunensia, 7(1), 5-18. https://doi.org/10.5817/MuB2018-1-1 Shiode, N. & Kanoshima, T. (1999). Utilising the spatial features of cyberspace for generating a dynamic museum environment. In C. Bauer, S. Diehl, & J.-F. Balaguer (Chairs), VRML '99: Proceedings of the fourth symposium on Virtual reality modeling language (pp. 79-84). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/299246.299271 Soreanu, R., & Simionca, A. (2012). Social network analysis. In L. J. Shepherd (Ed), Critical approaches to security: An introduction to theories and methods (pp. 181-195) https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203076873 Soren, B. J. (2009). Museum experiences that change visitors. Museum Management and Curatorship, 24(3), 233-251. https://doi.org/10.1080/09647770903073060 Sousa, J. P., Cordeiro, P., & Cunha, C. R. (2022). The use of technologies in museums: A bibliometric analysis based on the web of science database. In T. Guarda, F. Portela, & M. F. Augusto (Eds.), Communications in Computer and Information Science: Vol. 1676. Advanced Research in Technologies, Information, Innovation and Sustainability (pp. 269-282). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20316-9_21 Styliani, S., Fotis, L., Kostas, K., & Petros, P. (2009). Virtual museums, a survey and some issues for consideration. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 10(4), 520-528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2009.03.003 Swartout, W., Traum, D., Artstein, R., Noren, D., Debevec, P., Bronnenkant, K., Williams, J., Leuski, A., Narayanan, S., Piepol, D., Lane, C., Morie, J., Aggarwal, P., Liewer, M., Chiang, J.-Y., Gerten, J., Chu, S., & White, K. (2010). Ada and Grace: Toward realistic and engaging virtual museum guides. In Allbeck, J., Badler, N., Bickmore, T., Pelachaud, C., Safonova, A. (Eds), Lecture Notes in Computer Science: Vol. 6356. Intelligent Virtual Agents: IVA 2010 (pp. 286-300). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15892-6_30 Sweetnam, M., Siochrú, M., Agosti, M., Manfioletti, M., Orio, N., & Ponchia, C. (2013, August 1). Stereotype or spectrum: Designing for a user continuum [Paper presentation]. The First Workshop on the Exploration, Navigation and Retrieval of Information in Cultural Heritage (ENRICH 2013), Dublin, Ireland. http://www.cultura-strep.eu/documents/54301/6ee399e9-7b90-49bb-a3ab-0fd68977c5fe Sylaiou, S., & Dafiotis, P. (2020). Storytelling in Virtual Museums: Engaging A Multitude of Voices. In Visual Computing for Cultural Heritage (pp. 369-388). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37191-3_19 Tang, M.-C., Cheng, Y.-J. & Chen, K.-H. (2017). A longitudinal study of intellectual cohesion in digital humanities using bibliometric analyses. Scientometrics, 113(2), 985-1008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2496-6 Tong, Y. & Ma, Y. (2021). Digital Museum Construction standards study. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, XLVI-M-1-2021, 753–760, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVI-M-1-2021-753-2021 Tserklevych, V., Prokopenko, O., Goncharova, O., Horbenko, I., Fedorenko, O., & Romanyuk, Y. (2021). Virtual Museum Space as the Innovative Tool for the Student Research Practice. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 16(14). https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v16i14.22975 Tsiropoulou, E. E., Thanou, A., & Papavassiliou, S. (2017). Quality of experience-based museum touring: A human in the loop approach. Social Network Analysis and Mining, 7(1). https://doi.org 10.1007/s13278-017-0453-2 van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2014). Visualizing bibliometric networks. In Y. Ding, R. Rousseau, & D. Wolfram (Eds), Measuring Scholarly Impact (pp. 285-320). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10377-8_13 van Hooland, S.V. (2006, September 13-15). From spectator to annotator: Possibilities offered by user-generated metadata for digital cultural heritage collections [Paper preasentation]. Immaculate Catalogues: Taxonomy, Metadata and Resource Discovery in the 21st Century, Proceedings of CILIP Conference, Norwich, United Kingdom. Virtual Museum Transnational Network. (2011, June). Categories and types of virtual museum. http://www.v-must.net/virtual-museums/categories Walsh, D., Clough, P., & Foster, J. (2016). User categories for digital cultural heritage. Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Accessing Cultural Heritage at Scale co-located with Joint Conference on Digital Libraries 2016 (JCDL 2016), 1611, 3-9. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1611/paper6.pdf Walsh, D., Hall, M. M., Clough, P., & Jonathan, F. (2020). Characterising online museum users: A study of the National Museums Liverpool museum website. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 21, 75-87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00799-018-0248-8 Waltman, L., van Eck, N. J., & Noyons, E. C.M. (2010). A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks. Journal of Informetrics, 4(4), 629-635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.07.002 Wang, P., Robins, G., & Pattison, P. (2009). PNet: Program for the simulation and Estimation of Exponential Random Graph (p*) Models-User Manual. Melnet. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/57a1436215d5dbbcd2031828/t/581ac45ce58c62432be83a02/1478149214983/PNetManual.pdf Wang, Y., Stash, N., Aroyo, L., Gorgels, P., Rutledge, L., & Schreiber, G. (2008). Recommendations based on semantically enriched museum collections. Journal of Web Semantics, 6(4), 283-290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.websem.2008.09.002 Wang, Z., Zhao, H., & Wang, Y. (2015). Social networks in marketing research 2001–2014: A co-word analysis. Scientometrics, 105(1), 65-82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1672-9 Wu, Y., Jiang, Q., Ni, S., & Liang, H. (2021). Critical factors for predicting users’ acceptance of digital museums for experience-influenced environments. Information, 12(10), Article 426. https://doi.org/10.3390/info12100426 Yang, G. (2009). A study on the user-centered interface design for virtual museums. In 2009 IEEE 10th International Conference on Computer-Aided Industrial Design & Conceptual Design (pp. 1647-1651). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/CAIDCD.2009.5374866 Yi, H., Pyun, J., Lee, C., & Lee, W. (2020). Scienscope: Hand-held mediation device for facilitating exploratory behaviors with exhibits in museum visitors. In R. Wakkary & K. Andersen (Chairs), DIS 2020: Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference (pp. 709-721). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3357236.3395581 Yi, T., Chang, M., Hong, S., Kim, M., & Lee, J. H. (2020, February). A study on understanding of visitor needs in art museum: Based on analysis of visual perception through eye-tracking. In International Conference on Intelligent Human Systems Integration (pp. 1132-1137). Springer. Yoshimura, Y., Sobolevsky, S., Ratti, C., Girardin, F., Carrascal, J. P., Blat, J., & Sinatra, R. (2014). An analysis of visitors' behavior in the Louvre Museum: A study using Bluetooth data. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 41(6), 1113-1131. Zhu, L., Reychava, I., McHaneyb, R., Brodac, A., Tald, Y., & Manore, O. (2019). Combined SNA and LDA methods to understand adverse medical events. International Journal of Risk & Safety in Medicine, 30(3), 129-153. https://doi.org/10.3233/JRS-180052 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/91358 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 博物館的核心典範與營運策略於20世紀後從機構取向轉換為以觀眾為中心,博物館觀眾研究在此背景下逐漸蓬勃發展,並具備實務應用的需求與目的。然而在實際執行上,相關文獻指出觀眾研究與博物館實務之間存在落差,包括轉化觀眾研究結果為實際運營策略及指引實務執行等,都限制了博物館觀眾研究在實務層面的效益。此外,過去的博物館觀眾研究多為個案研究,基於不同場域、主題、目的,以及近年大量採用新興媒體科技等差異,研究結果與發現經常分散且分歧,因此,針對博物館觀眾相關研究的系統化彙整,對於觀眾研究的長期發展與實務應用有其必要性。藉由揭示博物館觀眾研究的發展狀況、研究缺口及應用面向與效益,提升博物館相關人員的理解與認同,並增進執行觀眾研究的能力,進而將研究成果應用於實務工作中獲得效益,形成良性循環。本研究基於上述背景,結合資訊計量與社會網絡分析之研究方法,以文獻中的關鍵字共現為基礎,並以視覺化網絡分佈視圖作為輔助,探索博物館觀眾相關研究之發展歷程、核心主題分佈狀況與各主題重視與應用的面向。
本研究以Scopus與Web of Science核心合集兩個綜合型資料庫為研究資料來源,蒐集共9,653篇博物館觀眾研究相關文獻,得到24,910個關鍵字進行分析。研究結果指出,博物館觀眾相關研究以2005年為臨界點,文獻與關鍵字數量開始大量成長,顯示觀眾研究對於博物館的重要性日益提升,也反映了博物館觀眾研究的主題更加多元與廣泛。透過時序劃分則可發現博物館觀眾研究的發展歷程共可分為三個階段:1980年以前與1980年代各研究獨立探索不同主題;1990年代至2004年則是出現共通關鍵字,但探索主題仍缺乏共通性;2005至2022年形成領域中受到共同關注的核心主題,其中2005至2014年以教育與學習為主,而2015至2022則著重於文化遺產中的科技應用。另一方面,社會網絡分析結果指出,博物館觀眾相關研究所高頻率使用的關鍵字共有10個不同的叢集,透過網絡分佈情況與關鍵字主題以確認各叢集的核心主題。這些主題皆與博物館運營有關,可歸類為「藝術/文化/歷史之詮釋、展示與應用」、「科技應用」、「教育/學習」、「行銷/推廣/傳播」、「社會包容」五個類型,而各主題皆有所重視的博物館類型/研究場域、研究對象,以及所採用的研究設計與學科領域/理論基礎。在呈現觀眾研究中主題結構之虞,更反映了目前領域中的研究缺口。 本研究透過資訊計量與社會網絡分析方法,系統化說明了博物館觀眾研究的全貌與分佈。並基於研究結果與發現,提出對博物館實務與研究上的具體建議,有助相關從業人員瞭解整體趨勢發展以評估觀眾研究的執行與運用需求。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | The paradigm and the operational strategies of museums shifted from an institution-oriented approach to a visitor-centered approach after the 20th century. Driven by practical needs and objectives, the domain of museum visitor studies has gradually thrived. However, there have been gaps between visitor studies and museum operations, including the transformation of research findings into operational strategies and guidance for implementation, limiting the practical benefits of visitor studies. Most of previous museum visitor studies were case studies, resulting in fragmented and divergent findings due to variations in venues, themes, objectives, and the increasing use of emerging media technologies. Therefore, there is a necessity for a systematic compilation of museum visitor studies to foster its long-term development and practical application. By revealing the developmental status, research gaps, and application dimensions and benefits of museum visitor studies, this study aims to enhance understanding and recognition among museum professionals, improve their ability to conduct visitor research, and ultimately apply research outcomes effectively in practical work, forming a positive cycle of utilization.
This study combines Informetrics and Social Network Analysis methods, utilizing co-occurrence keywords in the literatures as the foundation and employing visualized network distribution maps as assistance, to explore the historical development, the distribution of core themes, and the emphasis and application aspects of each theme. The data of this study were sourced from two comprehensive databases, Scopus and Web of Science Core Collection, resulting in a dataset of 9,653 publications related to museum visitor studies, comprising 24,910 unique keywords for analysis. The findings indicate that museum visitor studies experienced a tipping point around 2005, with a substantial increase in the quantity of publications and keywords, highlighting the growing importance of visitor studies in museums and the diversification of research themes. Through chronological division, the development of museum visitor studies can be classified into three stages: before 1980 and the 1980s, characterized by independent explorations of various themes; the 1990s to 2004, where co-occurrence keyword “heritage” emerged, but shared research themes were still lacking; and 2005 to 2022, forming a core theme with common interests. From 2005 to 2014, the main focus was on education and learning, while from 2015 to 2022, there was a concentration on technological applications in cultural heritage. Furthermore, Social Network Analysis revealed the high-frequency keywords in museum visitor studies can be grouped into 10 different clusters, identified the core themes through network distribution and keyword analysis. These themes are related to the operation of museums and can be classified into 5 categories: “Interpretation, Exhibition, and Application of Art/Culture/History,” “Technological Applications,” “Education/Learning,” “Marketing/Promotion/Communication,” and “Social Inclusion.” Each theme emphasizes specific types of museums, research fields, research subjects, research designs, and disciplinary/theoretical foundations. Presenting the thematic structure of visitor studies further highlights the current research gaps in the domain. Through the application of Informetrics and Social Network Analysis, this study provides a comprehensive overview and distribution of museum visitor studies. Based on the research findings, specific recommendations are proposed for museum practices and research, helping relevant practitioners understand the overall developmental trends and evaluate the implementation and utilization needs of visitor studies. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2024-01-12T16:10:47Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2024-01-12T16:10:47Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 謝辭 I
摘 要 II ABSTRACT IV 目 錄 VI 圖目錄 VII 表目錄 IX 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的與研究問題 4 第三節 研究範圍與研究限制 5 第二章 文獻回顧 6 第一節 博物館觀眾研究 6 第二節 數位科技變遷下的博物館發展 15 第三節 領域知識分析與探索 20 第三章 研究方法與設計 26 第一節 研究設計 26 第二節 研究對象 26 第三節 資料處理與研究工具 29 第四節 資料分析 31 第四章 研究結果 33 第一節 文獻分佈概況 33 第二節 關鍵字叢集分析結果 63 第三節 小結 102 第五章 結論 105 第一節 研究發現 105 第二節 結論與建議 112 參考文獻 116 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.subject | 領域分析 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 社會網絡分析 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 資訊計量學 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 觀眾研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 博物館 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Informetrics | en |
| dc.subject | Museum | en |
| dc.subject | Visitor Studies | en |
| dc.subject | Domain Analysis | en |
| dc.subject | Social Network Analysis | en |
| dc.title | 以領域分析方法探索博物館學領域中觀眾研究之發展 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The Domain Analysis of Museum Visitor Studies | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 111-2 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 黃明月;岳修平;唐牧群 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Ming-Yueh Hwang;Hsiu-Ping Yueh;Muh-Chyun Tang | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 博物館,觀眾研究,領域分析,社會網絡分析,資訊計量學, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Museum,Visitor Studies,Domain Analysis,Social Network Analysis,Informetrics, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 125 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202303017 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(限校園內公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2023-08-09 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 文學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 圖書資訊學系 | - |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2028-08-04 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 圖書資訊學系 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-111-2.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 14.51 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
