請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/91340完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 何筱文 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Mia Hsiao-Wen Ho | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 李宗澄 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Tsung-Cheng Lee | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-01-03T16:10:51Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2024-01-04 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2024-01-03 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2023 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2023-09-21 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Agarwala, N., Pareek, R., & Sahu, T. N. (2022). Does board independence influence CSR performance? A GMM-based dynamic panel data approach. Social Responsibility Journal, 19(6), 1003-1022.
Al Amosh, H., & Khatib, S. F. (2022). Ownership structure and environmental, social and governance performance disclosure: the moderating role of the board independence. Journal of Business and Socio-Economic Development, 2(1), 49-66. Al Amosh, H., & Mansor, N. (2021). Disclosure of integrated reporting elements by industrial companies: evidence from Jordan. Journal of Management and Governance, 25, 121-145. Amel-Zadeh, A., & Serafeim, G. (2018). Why and how investors use ESG information: Evidence from a global survey. Financial Analysts Journal, 74(3), 87-103. Arayssi, M., Jizi, M., & Tabaja, H. H. (2020). The impact of board composition on the level of ESG disclosures in GCC countries. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 11(1), 137-161. Aydoğmuş, M., Gülay, G., & Ergun, K. (2022). Impact of ESG performance on firm value and profitability. Borsa Istanbul Review, 22(2), 119-127. Bhatia, S., & Marwaha, D. (2022). The influence of board factors and gender diversity on the ESG disclosure score: a study on Indian companies. Global Business Review, 23(6), 1544-1557. Birindelli, G., Dell’Atti, S., Iannuzzi, A. P., & Savioli, M. (2018). Composition and activity of the board of directors: Impact on ESG performance in the banking system. Sustainability, 10(12), 4699. Borghesi, R., Houston, J. F., & Naranjo, A. (2014). Corporate socially responsible investments: CEO altruism, reputation, and shareholder interests. Journal of Corporate Finance, 26, 164-181. Capital Group. (2022). ESG Global Study 2022. https://www.capitalgroup.com/institutional/investments/esg/perspectives/esg-global-study.html Carroll, A. B. (1999). Corporate social responsibility: Evolution of a definitional construct. Business & Society, 38(3), 268-295. Chang, X., Fu, K., Jin, Y., & Liem, P. F. (2022). Sustainable finance: ESG/CSR, firm value, and investment returns. Asia‐Pacific Journal of Financial Studies, 51(3), 325-371. Chen, Z., & Xie, G. (2022). ESG disclosure and financial performance: Moderating role of ESG investors. International Review of Financial Analysis, 83, 102291. Daugaard, D., & Ding, A. (2022). Global drivers for ESG performance: The body of knowledge. Sustainability, 14(4), 2322. Deef, A. T., Alrawashdeh, B., & Al-fawaerh, N. (2021). The impact of foreign ownership and managerial ownership on tax avoidance: empirical evidence from Egypt. Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal, 25(2), 1-13. Deegan, C. (2002). Introduction: The legitimising effect of social and environmental disclosures – a theoretical foundation. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(3), 282-311. Doğan, M. (2013). Does firm size affect the firm profitability? Evidence from Turkey. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 4(4), 53-59. Dorfleitner, G., Kreuzer, C., & Sparrer, C. (2020). ESG controversies and controversial ESG: about silent saints and small sinners. Journal of Asset Management, 21(5), 393-412. Drempetic, S., Klein, C., & Zwergel, B. (2020). The influence of firm size on the ESG score: Corporate sustainability ratings under review. Journal of business ethics, 167, 333-360. Farooque, O. A., Dahawy, K. M., Shehata, N. F., & Soliman, M. T. (2022). ESG Disclosure, Board Diversity and Ownership: Did the Revolution Make a Difference in Egypt? Corporate Ownership & Control, 19(2), 67-80. Friedman, M. (1962). Capitalism and Freedom. University of Chicago Press. Fuadah, L. L., Mukhtaruddin, M., Andriana, I., & Arisman, A. (2022). The ownership structure, and the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) disclosure, firm value and firm performance: The audit committee as moderating variable. Economies, 10(12), 314. Habbash, M. (2016). Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility disclosure: evidence from Saudi Arabia. Social Responsibility Journal, 12(4), 740-754. Halkos, G., & Nomikos, S. (2021). Corporate social responsibility: Trends in global reporting initiative standards. Economic Analysis and Policy, 69, 106-117. Haniffa, R. M., & Cooke, T. E. (2005). The impact of culture and governance on corporate social reporting. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 24(5), 391-430. Huang, R. D., & Shiu, C. Y. (2005). Overseas monitors in emerging financial markets: Evidence from foreign ownership in Taiwan. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=875365 Huang, W. H., Huang, M. J., & Huang, M. H. (2018). The Impact of Government Shareholding on Firm Performance: A Corporate Governance Perspective. In Innovative Mobile and Internet Services in Ubiquitous Computing: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Innovative Mobile and Internet Services in Ubiquitous Computing (IMIS-2017) (pp. 741-750). Springer International Publishing. Husted, B. W., & de Sousa-Filho, J. M. (2019). Board structure and environmental, social, and governance disclosure in Latin America. Journal of Business Research, 102, 220-227. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305-360. Kamaludin, K., Ibrahim, I., Sundarasen, S., & Faizal, O. V. A. (2022). ESG in the boardroom: Evidence from the Malaysian market. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 7(1), 4. Kao, M. F., Hodgkinson, L., & Jaafar, A. (2019). Ownership structure, board of directors and firm performance: evidence from Taiwan. Corporate Governance: The international journal of business in society, 19(1), 189-216. Khan, A., Muttakin, M. B., & Siddiqui, J. (2013). Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility disclosures: Evidence from an emerging economy. Journal of Business Ethics, 114, 207-223. Khan, M. A. (2022). ESG disclosure and Firm performance: A bibliometric and meta analysis. Research in International Business and Finance, 61, 101668. Kouser, R., Awan, A., Rana, G., & Shahzad, F. (2011). Firm size, leverage and profitability: Overriding impact of accounting information system. Journal of Management and Business Review, 1(10), 58-64. Lagasio, V., & Cucari, N. (2019). Corporate governance and environmental social governance disclosure: A meta‐analytical review. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(4), 701-711. Laplume, A. O., Sonpar, K., & Litz, R. A. (2008). Stakeholder theory: Reviewing a theory that moves us. Journal of Management, 34(6), 1152-1189. Lau, Y. W., & Tong, C. Q. (2008). Are Malaysian government-linked companies (GLCs) creating value. International Applied Economics and Management Letters, 1(1), 9-12. Lee, T. T. (2023). Analyzing the Tone of Letter to Shareholders through Text Mining: Exploring the Association between Tone, ESG Rating, and ESG Disclosure. [Master’s Thesis, National Chengchi University]. National Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations in Taiwan. https://hdl.handle.net/11296/xh9g8d Liang, J. W., Lin, M. F., & Chin, C. L. (2012). Does foreign institutional ownership motivate firms in an emerging market to increase voluntary disclosure? Evidence from Taiwan. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 39, 55-76. Liu, W. C., & Hsu, C. M. (2014). Profit performance of financial holding companies: Evidence from Taiwan. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 50(sup3), 190-200. Lu, S., & Cheng, B. (2023). Does environmental regulation affect firms' ESG performance? Evidence from China. Managerial and Decision Economics, 44(4), 2004-2009. Manita, R., Bruna, M. G., Dang, R., & Houanti, L. H. (2018). Board gender diversity and ESG disclosure: evidence from the USA. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 19(2), 206-224. Menicucci, E., & Paolucci, G. (2022). Board Diversity and ESG Performance: Evidence from the Italian Banking Sector. Sustainability, 14(20), 13447. Mio, C., Fasan, M., Marcon, C., & Panfilo, S. (2020). The predictive ability of legitimacy and agency theory after the implementation of the EU directive on non‐financial information. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(6), 2465-2476. O’Connell, M., & Ward, A. M. (2020). Shareholder theory/shareholder value. Encyclopedia of sustainable management, 1-7. O’Donovan, G. (2002). Environmental disclosures in the annual report: Extending the applicability and predictive power of legitimacy theory. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(3), 344-371. O'Neill, H. M., Saunders, C. B., & McCarthy, A. D. (1989). Board members, corporate social responsiveness and profitability: Are tradeoffs necessary?. Journal of Business Ethics, 8, 353-357. Ozcan, I. S. I. K., Unal, E. A., & Yener, U. N. A. L. (2017). The effect of firm size on profitability: evidence from Turkish manufacturing sector. Journal of Business Economics and Finance, 6(4), 301-308. Panda, B., & Leepsa, N. M. (2017). Agency theory: Review of theory and evidence on problems and perspectives. Indian journal of corporate governance, 10(1), 74-95. Park, S. R., & Jang, J. Y. (2021). The impact of ESG management on investment decision: Institutional investors’ perceptions of country-specific ESG criteria. International Journal of Financial Studies, 9(3), 48. Peng, L. S., & Isa, M. (2020). Environmental, social and governance (ESG) practices and performance in Shariah firms: agency or stakeholder theory? Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting & Finance, 16(1). Pfarrer, M. D. (2013). What is the purpose of the firm?: Shareholder and stakeholder theories. In Good Business (pp. 86-93). Routledge. Reber, B., Gold, A., & Gold, S. (2022). ESG disclosure and idiosyncratic risk in initial public offerings. Journal of Business Ethics, 179(3), 867-886. Schroders. (2022). Global Investor Study 2022. https://www.schroders.com/en-hk/hk/individual/learn-about-investing/gis/ Sharma, P., Panday, P., & Dangwal, R. C. (2020). Determinants of environmental, social and corporate governance (ESG) disclosure: a study of Indian companies. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 17, 208-217. Stroh, L. K., Brett, J. M., Baumann, J. P., & Reilly, A. H. (1996). Agency theory and variable pay compensation strategies. Academy of Management Journal, 39(3), 751-767. Sun, Q., Tong, W. H., & Tong, J. (2002). How does government ownership affect firm performance? Evidence from China’s privatization experience. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 29(1‐2), 1-27. Suttipun, M. (2021). The influence of board composition on environmental, social and governance (ESG) disclosure of Thai listed companies. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 18(4), 391-402. Swandari, F., & Sadikin, A. (2016). The effect of ownership structure, profitability, leverage, and firm size on corporate social responsibility (CSR). Binus Business Review, 7(3), 315-320. Taiwan Economic Journal. (2022). TESG Rating, the ESG Indicator for Companies in Taiwan! https://www.tejwin.com/en/news/tesg-rating-the-esg-indicator-for-companies-in-taiwan/ Taiwan Economic Journal. (2023). The Latest Update of TESG Rating 2023 is Released! https://tejdb.tej.com.tw/news/355 Tamimi, N., & Sebastianelli, R. (2017). Transparency among S&P 500 companies: An analysis of ESG disclosure scores. Management Decision, 55(8), 1660-1680. Tsang, A., Frost, T., & Cao, H. (2023). Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) disclosure: A literature review. The British Accounting Review, 55(1), 101149. Tse, T. (2011). Shareholder and stakeholder theory: After the financial crisis. Qualitative Research in Financial Markets, 3(1), 51-63. United Nations. (2004). Who Cares Wins: Connecting the Financial Markets to a Changing World? https://www.unglobalcompact.org/docs/issues_doc/Financial_markets/who_cares_who_wins.pdf Velte, P. (2019). The bidirectional relationship between ESG performance and earnings management – empirical evidence from Germany. Journal of Global Responsibility, 10(4), 322-338. Waluyo, W. (2017). Firm size, firm age, and firm growth on corporate social responsibility in Indonesia : the case of real estate companies. European Research Studies Journal, 20(4A), 360-369. Withisuphakorn, P., & Jiraporn, P. (2016). The effect of firm maturity on corporate social responsibility (CSR): do older firms invest more in CSR?. Applied Economics Letters, 23(4), 298-301. Wu, K. T., Lin, S. H., Wang, Q., & Chang, Y. (2023). How Do Firm's CSR Performance and ESG Ratings Affect Performance and Risk. International Review of Accounting, Banking & Finance, 15(1), 1-46. Yadav, P., & Prashar, A. (2022). Board gender diversity: implications for environment, social, and governance (ESG) performance of Indian firms. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, (ahead-of-print). Yavaş, Ç. V., & Erdogan, S. (2016). The effect of foreign ownership on firm performance: Evidence from emerging market. Australian Academy of Accounting and Finance Review, 2(4), 363-371. | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/91340 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 近年來，國際吹起Environmental-Social-Governance (ESG)風潮，ESG相關資訊也成為投資人在做投資決策時重視的指標之一。為了讓台灣投資人能透過企業之特定特徵，推測企業日後ESG之發展，本文針對台灣企業之外資持股比例、政府持股比例對於企業未來一年之ESG表現分數、ESG揭露分數的影響進行研究。本文自臺灣經濟新報(TEJ)資料庫採集台灣上市櫃企業2018-2021年之資料，共有5869份有效樣本，並設立四個多元迴歸模型。迴歸結果顯示，外資持股比例、政府持股比例，皆各與ESG表現分數、ESG揭露分數呈現顯著正相關。從結果可以看出，外資、政府持股比例高，確實會促使企業更重視ESG，讓企業未來一年之ESG表現分數、揭露分數較高。另外，本文將「持股比例」改為「是否有持股」進行額外測試，結果除了外資持股與ESG揭露分數未有顯著關係外，其餘三個迴歸模型皆呈現顯著正相關，可見只要有外資或政府持股，對於企業ESG之發展即有影響。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | In recent years, there has been a growing international trend of Environmental-Social-Governance (ESG), making ESG-related information a crucial factor considered by investors when making investment decisions. Aiming to help Taiwanese investors predict the future ESG development of Taiwanese companies based on specific characteristics, this study investigates the impact of foreign shareholding percentage and government shareholding percentage on the ESG performance scores and ESG disclosure scores of Taiwanese companies for the upcoming year. This study utilized data from the Taiwan Economic Journal (TEJ) database for Taiwan-listed companies from 2018 to 2021. It included 5869 valid samples and established four multiple regression models. The findings from the regression analysis show significant positive correlations between foreign shareholding percentage and government shareholding percentage with ESG performance scores and ESG disclosure scores. Therefore, from the results, it can be observed that higher levels of foreign and government shareholding effectively drive companies to prioritize ESG, leading to higher ESG performance scores and disclosure scores for the upcoming year. In addition, this study performed supplementary tests by replacing "shareholding percentage" with "whether there is shareholding." The findings revealed that, apart from foreign shareholding, which did not demonstrate a significant relationship with ESG disclosure scores, the remaining three regression models all showed significant positive correlations. This indicates that as long as foreign or government shareholdings exist, they can influence the development of corporate ESG practices. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2024-01-03T16:10:51Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2024-01-03T16:10:51Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 誌謝 i
摘要 ii Abstract iii Contents iv List of Tables v Chapter 1: Introduction 1 1.1 Research Motivation 1 1.2 Research Purpose and Research Questions 3 Chapter 2: Literature Review 5 2.1 Foreign Investors, Government, and ESG 5 2.2 Measurement of ESG 9 2.3 The Impact of Shareholders on Corporate ESG Decision-making 11 2.4 Hypothesis Development 15 Chapter 3: Research Methodology 18 3.1 Data Source and Sample Selection 18 3.2 Research Model 20 3.3 Variable Definitions 22 Chapter 4: Empirical Results Analysis 33 4.1 Descriptive Statistical Analysis 33 4.2 Correlation Analysis 37 4.3 Multiple Regression Analysis 39 4.4 Additional Testing 46 Chapter 5: Conclusions 53 5.1 Academic Contributions 53 5.2 Practical Contributions 56 5.3 Limitations and Future Research Recommendations 58 References 60 | - |
| dc.language.iso | en | - |
| dc.title | 外資持股比例及政府持股比例對ESG表現及ESG揭露之影響 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The Impacts of Foreign and Government Shareholding Percentages on the Firm's Environmental-Social-Governance Performance and Disclosure | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 112-1 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 蘇威傑;江藍龍 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Wei-Chieh Su;Lanlung Chiang | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 永續,ESG表現,ESG揭露,外資持股比例,政府持股比例, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Sustainability,ESG Performance,ESG Disclosure,Foreign Shareholding Percentage,Government Shareholding Percentage, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 68 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202304249 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2023-09-22 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 國際企業學系 | - |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2028-09-21 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 國際企業學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-112-1.pdf 此日期後於網路公開 2028-09-21 | 1.02 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。