請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/9107完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 李國譚(Kuo-Tan Li) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Lan-Yen Chang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 張嵐雁 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-20T20:09:28Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2009-07-31 | |
| dc.date.available | 2021-05-20T20:09:28Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2009-07-31 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2009 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2009-07-30 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 第一章 參考文獻
王仁助、羅玉青. 2003. 桑樹機能性成份簡介. 農業世界 242: 34-39. 白勝、柯益富、餘茂德. 1997. 桑屬（Morus）植物形態數值分類研究. 四川蠶業 1997(2):23-28. 朱永康. 1953. 臺灣的桑樹品種. 臺灣農林 7:26-28. 余錫金. 2005. 蠶桑. p.237-250. 刊於：潘芝等主編. 臺灣農家要覽：農作篇（一）(增訂三版). 豐年社出版. 臺北巿. 吳思敬、顏國慶. 1996. 成熟階段對桑葉抗氧化性之影響. 食品科學 23:412-421. 吳登楨. 1977. 桑樹之品種改良. 科學農業 25:242-244. 吳雲. 1964. 我國不同桑品種的倍數性鑒定. 蠶業科學 2:165-170. 李東升、張和禹. 2003. 桑樹種與品種分類研究進展. 中國蠶業. 24:15-17. 易任. 1990. 主成份分析與群集分析應用於雨量空間分佈之研究. 行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告. 75頁. 林志忠. 1999. 桑科. p.46. 刊於：楊遠波、劉和義、呂勝由編著. 臺灣維管束植物簡誌. 第二卷. 行政院農委會出版. 臺北巿. 徐克學. 1996. 數量分類學. 水產出版社. 基隆巿. 翁儷倩. 2001. 柑橘遺傳歧異性之分析. 國立臺灣大學園藝所碩士論文. 90pp. 張哲嘉、范瑞君、張銘文、齊文隆、余鍚金. 2005. 桑樹的分類與自然分佈. 中國園藝 51:13-18. 張哲嘉. 2006a. 臺灣桑樹之分類及品種改良. 臺灣園藝 52:377-392. 張哲嘉. 2006b. 果桑(桑椹)之生育與栽培管理. 農業世界雜誌 275:46-54. 梁國真、賴亮邵、劉燕儷、李汾陽. 2007. 中國通史 p.8. 五南圖書出版, 臺北. 陳彩雲、蕭寧馨、楊雯如、林宗賢. 2004. 臺灣水果抗氧化能力之研究. 中國園藝 50: 592(摘要). 曾富生、吳登楨. 1979. 臺灣野生桑樹（Morus acidosa Griff.）農藝性狀之變異. 興大農藝學報 4:39-45. 潘一樂. 2000. 桑種質資源和桑樹育種的研究現狀與展望. 蠶業科學 26:1-5. 蔣同慶、朱勇. 1985. 二倍體桑樹的核型分析. 蠶學通訊 1985(3):9-17. 盧英權. 1988. 栽桑學. 初版. p.1-136. 國立編譯館發行. 臺北巿. 儲瑞銀、孫曉霞. 1986. 桑屬植物細胞遺傳學的研究 I. 部分桑品種的染色體數. 12: 199-202. 儲瑞銀、孫曉霞. 1987. 桑屬植物細胞遺傳學的研究 II. 四個桑品種的核型分析. 13: 129-132. 小泉源一. 1917. 桑屬植物考. 蠶試報 3:1. 大澤一衛. 1916. 桑の細胞學并に實驗的研究. 蚕試報告 1:215-292. 南澤吉三郎. 1976a. 栽桑學. p.145. 鳳鳴社. 東京. 日本. 南澤吉三郎. 1976b. 栽桑學. p.11-124. 鳳鳴社. 東京. 日本. 南澤吉三郎. 1976c. 栽桑學. p.125-131. 鳳鳴社. 東京. 日本. 南澤吉三郎. 1976d. 栽桑學. p.161-162. 鳳鳴社. 東京. 日本. 堀田禎吉. 1954. 桑樹分類之研究. 京都工藝纖維大學出版. 京都. 日本. 關 博夫. 1956. 桑樹の性染色体について. 日蚕雑. 25:191. (予報) 關 博夫. 1959. 桑属植物の細胞學的研究. 信州大繊紀要. 20:1-91. APG II. 2003. An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for orders and families of flowering plants: APG II. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 141:399-436. Asano, N., N. Oseki, E. Tomioka, H. Kizu, and K. Matsui. 1994. N-containing sugars from Morus alba and their glycosidase inhibitory activities. Carbohydr. Res. 259:243-255. Awasthi, A. K., G. M. Nagaraja1, G. V. Naik, S. Kanginakudru, K. Thangavelu, and J. Nagaraju. 2004. Genetic diversity and relationships in mulberry (genus Morus) as revealed by RAPD and ISSR marker assays. BMC Genet. 5: 1-9. Banerjee, R., S. Roychowdhuri, H. Sau, B. K. Das, P. Ghosh, and B. Saratchandra. 2007. Genetic diversity and interrelationship among mulberry genotypes. J. Genet. Genomics 34:691-697. Berg, C. C. 2001. Moreae, Artocarpeae, and Dorstenia (Moraceae), with introductions to the family and Ficus and with additions and corrections to flora neotropica monograph 7, p.53-54. In: C. C. Berg (ed.). Flora neotropica, Vol. 83. New York Botanical Garden Press, New York. Berg, C.C. 1986. The limitation and subdivision of the genus Maclura (Moraceae). Proc. K. Ned. Akad. Wet., Ser. C: Biol. Med. Sci. 89:241-247. Bhattacharya, E. and S. A. Ranade. 2001. Molecular distinction amongst varieties of mulberry using RAPD and DAMD profiles. BMC Plant Biol. 1:3-10. Botton, A., G. Barcaccia, S. Cappellozza, R. Da Tos, C. Bonghi, and A. Ramina. 2005. DNA fingerprinting sheds light on the origin of introduced mulberry (Morus spp.) accessions in Italy. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 52:181-192. Bureau, E. 1873. Moraceae, p.211-288. In: A. De Candolle (ed.). Prodromus Systematis Naturalis Regni Vegetabilis. Vol. 17. Bibliople apud medicine academiam, Paris, France. Carvalho, R., W. S. Soares Filho, A. C. Brasileiro-Vidal, and M. Guerra. 2005. The relationships among lemons, limes and citron: a chromosomal comparison. Cytogenet Genome Res. 109:276-282. Cattell, R. B. 1966. The meaning and strategic use of factor analysis, p.174-243. In: R. B. Catell (eds.). Handbook of multivariate experimental psychology. Rand McNally, Chicago. Chung, M.-C, Y.-I. Lee, Y.-Y. Cheng, Y.-J. Chou, and C.-F. Lu. 2008. Chromosomal polymorphism of ribosomal genes in the genus Oryza. Theor. Appl. Genet. 116:745-753. Dandin, S. B. 1998. Mulberry: a versatile biosource in the service of mankind. Acta Sericologica Sinica 24:109-113. Dias, J. S., A. A. Monterio, and M. B. Lima. 1993. Numerical taxonomy of Portuguese Tronchuda cabbage and Galega kale landraces using morphological characters. Euphytica 69:51-68. Dunn, G. and B. S. Everitt. 1982. An introduction to mathematical taxonomy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. FAO. 2009. FAOSTAT: Mulberry production in 1990-2005. 28 May 2009. <http://faostat.fao.org/DesktopDefault.aspx?PageID=291&lang=en> Fransz, P. F., C. Alonso-Blanco, T. B. Liharska, A. J. M. Peeters, P. Zabel, and J. H. de Jong. 1996. High-resolution physical mapping in Arabidopsis thaliana and tomato by fluorescence in situ hybridization to extended DNA fibers. Plant J. 9:421-430. Gall, J. G. and M. L. Pardue. 1969. Formation and detection of RNA-DNA hybrid molecules in cytological preparations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 63:378-383. Gaudichaud, C. B. 1830. Chlorophora, p.509. In: C. B. Gaudichaud (ed.). Voyage autour du Mode, entrepris par ordre du Roi, execute sur les corvettes de S. M. l’Uranie et la physicienne par M. Louis de Freycinet bontanique. Gill, B. S. and R. C. Gupta. 1979. Cytological studies in the sex types of Morus alba L. (Moraceae). Current Sci. 48:35-36. Greene, E. L. 1910. Some southwestern mulberries, p.112-121. In: E. L. Greene (ed.). Leaflets of botanical observation and criticism. Vol.2 Washington D. C., USA. Guerra, M., A. Pedrosa, A. E. B. Silva, M. T. M. Cornélio, K. G. B. Santos, and W. S. Soares Filho. 1997. Chromosome number and secondary constriction variation in 51 accessions of a Citrus germplasm bank. Braz. J. Genet. 20:489-496. Guerra, M., K. G. B. Santos, A. E. B. Silva, and F. Ehrendorfer. 2000. Heterochromatin banding patterns in Rutaceae-Aurantioideae – a case of parallel chromosomal evolution. Am. J. Bot. 87:735-737. Hirano H. 1980. Thremmetological studies of protein variation in mulberry. Bul. Sericult. Expt. Sta. 28:67-186. Hunter, R. L. and C. L. Markert. 1957. Histochemical demonstration of enzymes separated by zone electrophoresis in starch gels. Science 125:1294-1295. Janaki-Ammal, E. K.1948. The origin of black mulberry. J. Royal Horticult. Soc. 73:117-120. John, H. A., M. L. Birnstiel, and K. W. Jones. 1969. RNA-DNA hybrids at the cytological level. Nature 223:582-587. Jones, H. 2003. Genetics: analysis of genes and genomes. 6th ed. p.329-330. Jones and Bartlett publishers, Sudbury, M.A., USA. Jones, S. B. and A. E. Luchsinger. 1987. Plant systematic. McGraw-Hill international editions. Singapore, New York. Kafkas, S., M. Özgen, Y. Doğan, B. Özcan, S. Ercişli, and S. Serçe. 2008. Molecular characterization of mulberry accessions in Turkey by AFLP markers. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 133:593-597. Kato, A., J. M. Vega, F. Han, J. C. Lamb, and J. A. Birchler. 2005. Advances in plant chromosome identification and cytogenetic techniques. Current opinion in plant biol. 8:148-154. Katsumata, F. 1970. Relationship between the length of styles and shape of idioblasts in mulberry leaves, with special reference to the classification of mulberry tree. J. Sericult. Sci. Japan. 41:387-395. Kumekawa, N. and K. Oshigane. 2004. Fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis of chromosomes of mulberry species with the diploid genome. Genes Genet. Syst. 79:387. (Abstract) Kunth, K. S. 1817. Broussonetia, p.32-33. In: Bonpland, A., A. Humboldt, and K. S. Kunth (eds.). Nova genera et species plantarum. Lutetiae Parisiorum: sumtibus Librariae Graeco-Latino-Germanico, Paris, France. Leitch, I. J. and J. S. Heslop-Harrison. 1992. Physical mapping of the 18S-5.8-26S rRNA genes in barley by in situ hybridization. Genome 35:1013-1018. Leitch, I. J. and M. D. Bennett. 1997. Polyploidy in angiosperms. Trends Plant Sci. 2: 470-476. Li, D. and X. Zhang. 2002. Physical localization of the 18S-5.8S-26S rDNA and sequence analysis of ITS regions in Thinopyrum ponticum (Poaceae: Triticeae): implications for concerted evolution. Ann. Bot. 90:445-452 Linde-Laursen, I, E. Ibsen, R. Von Bothmer, and H. Giese. 1992. Physical localization of active and inactive rRNA gene loci in Hordeum marinum ssp. gussoneanum (4X) by in situ hybridization. Genome 35:1032-1036. Linné, C. 1753. Morus, p.968. In: C. Linné (ed.). Species plantarum. Vol. 2. Stockholm, Sweden. Moretti, G. 1841. Prodromo di una monografia della specie del genere Morus. Istituto lombardo di scienze e lettere, 1842, 1:167. NIAS genebank. 2009. The list of mulberry accessions in germplasm. 10 Mar. 2009. <http://www.gene.affrc.go.jp/ex-nises/mulberry/mulberryindex.html> Oginuma, K. and H. Tobe. 1995. Karyomorphology of some Moraceae and Cecropiaceae (Urticales). J. Plant Res. 108:313-326. Osuji, J. O., B. E. Okoli, D. Vuylsteke, and R. Ortiz. 1997. Multivariate pattern of quantitative trait variation in triploid banana and plantain cultivars. Sci. Hort. 71:197-202. Raina, S. N. and Y. Mukai. 1999. Detection of a variable number of 18S-5.8S-26S and 5S ribosomal DNA loci by fluorescent in situ hybridization in diploid and tetraploid Arachis species. Genome 42:52-59. Rakoczy-Trojanowska, M. and H. Bolibok. 2004. Characteristics and a comparison of three classes of microsatellite-based markers and their application in plants. Cell. Mol. Biol. Lett. 9:221-238. Renner, S. S. and R. E. Ricklefs. 1995. Dioecy and its correlates in the flowering plants. Amer. J. Bot. 82:596-606. Ried, T., A. Baldini, T. C. Rand, and D. C. Ward. 1992. Simultaneous visualization of seven different DNA probes by in situ hybridization using combinatorial fluorescence and digital imaging microscopy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89:1388-1392. Rohwer, J. G. 1993. Moraceae, p.438-453. In: Kubitzki, K., Rohwer, J. G. and Bittrich, V. (eds.). The families and genera of vascular plants. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. Sànchez M.D. 2000. World distribution and utilization of mulberry, potential for animal feeding. FAO Electronic conference on mulberry for animal production. 10 Mar. 2009. <http://www.fao.org/livestock/agap/frg/mulberry/Papers/HTML/Intro.htm.> Sattler, R. and R. Rutishauser. 1997. The fundamental relevance of morphology and morphogenesis to plant research. Annal Bot. 80:571-582. Schubert, I. and U. Wobus. 1985. In situ hybridization confirms jumping nucleolus organizing regions in Allium. Chromosoma 92:143-148 Sharma, A., R. Sharma, and H. Machii. 2000. Assessment of genetic diversity in a Morus germplasm collection using fluorescence-based AFLP markers. Theor. Appl. Genet. 101:1049-1055. Sinoto, Y. 1929. Chromosome studies in some dioecious plants with special reference to Allosome. Cytologia 1:109-199. Sokal, R. R. and P. A Sneath. 1963. A critique of current taxonomy, p.5-36. In: R. R. Sokal and P. A Sneath (eds.). Principles of numerical taxonomy. W. H. Freeman and company, San Francisco, USA. Stebbins, G. L. 1971. Chromosomal evolution in higher plants. p.216. Addison-Wesley, MA, USA. Sugimura, Y, I. Nitta, Y. Morita Y. S. Ishikawa, T. Mori, E. Katani, and T. Furusawa. 1998. Microscopic detection of calcium deposited in idioblasts of mulberry leaves. J. Seri. Sci. Jap. 67:445-451. Susheelamma, B. N., J. S. Kumar, S. B. Dandin, M. S. Jolly, K. Sengupta, and R. Raju. 1990. Karyomorphological studies in a few exotic varieties of genus Morus L. Cytologia 55:107-114. Sybenga, J. 1992. The somatic chromosome complement: karyotype analysis, p.65-100. In: J. Sybenga.(ed.). Cytogenetics in plant breeding. Springer-Verlag. New York, USA Tahara, M. 1910. Ueber die Kernteilung bei Morus. Bot. Mag. Tokyo 24:281-289. Vijayan, K., P. P. Srivastava, and A. K. Awathi. 2004. Analysis of phylogenetic relationship among five mulberry (Morus) species using molecular markers. Genome 47:439-448. Vijayan, K., P. P. Srivatsava, C. V. Nair, A. K. Awasthi, A. Tikader, B. Sreenivasa, and S. R. Urs. 2006. Molecular characterization and identification of marker associated with yield traits in mulberry using ISSR markers. Plant Breeding 125:298-301. Yampolsky, C. and H. Yampolsky. 1922. Distribution of sex forms in the Phanerogamic flora. Bibliotheca Genet. 3:1-62. Zerega, N. J. C., Clement, W. L., S. L. Datwyler, and G. D. Weiblen. 2005. Biogeography and divergence times in the mulberry family (Moraceae). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 37:402-416. Zhao, W., Y. Wang, T. Chen, G. Jia, X. Wang, J. Qi, Y. Pang, S. Wang, Z. Li, Y. Huang, Y. Pan, and Y.H. Yang. 2007. Genetic structure of mulberry from different ecotypes revealed by ISSRs in China: An implications for conservation of local mulberry varieties. Sci. Hort. 115: 47–55. Zhao, W., Z. Zhou, X. Miao, Y. Zhang, S. Wang, J. Huang, H. Xiang ,Y. Pan, and Y. Huang. 2007. A comparison of genetic variation among wild and cultivated Morus species (Moraceae: Morus) as revealed by ISSR and SSR markers. Biodivers. Conserv. 16: 275-290. Zhao, W., Y. Pan, Z. Zhang, S. Jia, X. Miao, and Y. Huang. 2005. Phylogeny of the genus Morus (Urticales: Moraceae) inferred from ITS and trnL-F sequences. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 4:563-569. Zhou, Z. and M. G. Gilbert. 2003. Moraceae, p.21-73. In: Wu, P. H. Raven and D. Hong (eds). Flora of China Vol. 5. Science Press, Beijing, China. 第二章 參考文獻 王仁助. 2003. 桑樹機能性成份簡介. 農業世界 242:34-39. 吳登楨. 1977. 桑樹之品種改良. 科學農業 25:242-244. 林志忠. 1999. 桑科. p.46. 刊於：楊遠波、劉和義、呂勝由編著. 臺灣維管束植物簡誌. 第二卷. 行政院農委會出版. 臺北巿. 徐克學. 1996. 數量分類學. 水產出版社. 基隆巿. 翁儷倩. 2001. 桶柑遺傳歧異性之分析. 國立臺灣大學園藝學研究所碩士論文. 張哲嘉. 2006. 臺灣桑樹之分類及品種改良. 臺灣園藝 52:377-392. 陳彩雲、蕭寧馨、楊雯如、林宗賢. 2004. 臺灣水果抗氧化能力之研究. 中國園藝 50: 592(摘要). 曾富生、吳登楨. 1979. 臺灣野生桑樹（Morus acidosa Griff.）農藝性狀之變異. 興大農藝學報 4:39-45. 歐錫坤、陳琦玲. 2000. 臺灣本地桃樹的需冷量評估與模式開發. 中國園藝 46:337-350. 盧英權. 1984. 栽桑學. 國立編譯館. 蠶蜂業改良場場誌編纂委員會. 1997. 臺灣省蠶蜂業改良場場誌. p.89-90. 蠶業改良場出版. 苗栗. 小泉源一. 1917. 桑屬植物考. 蠶試報 3:1. 南澤吉三郎. 1976. 栽桑學. p.127-129. 鳳鳴社. 東京. 日本. 堀田禎吉. 1954. 桑樹分類之研究. 京都工藝纖維大學出版. 京都. 日本. APG II. 2003. An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for orders and families of flowering plants: APG II. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 141:399-436. Asano, N., E. Oseki, E. Tomioka, H. Kizu, and K. Matsui. 1994. N-containing sugars from Morus alba and their glycosidase inhibitory activities. Carbohydr. Res. 259:243-255. Bureau, E. 1873. Moraceae, p.211-288. In: A. DeCandolle (ed.). Prodromus systematis naturalis regni vegetabilis. Vol. 17. Paris, France. Chang, J.-C. 2008. ‘Miaoli No. 1’mulberry : A new cultivar for berry production. HortScience 43:1594-1595. Dandin, S. B. 1998. Mulberry: a versatile biosource in the service of mankind. Acta Sericologica Sinica 24:109-113. Dias, J. S., A. A. Monterio, and M. B. Lima. 1993. Numerical taxonomy of Portuguese Tronchuda cabbage and Galega kale landraces using morphological characters. Euphytica 69:51-68. Hirano, H. 1982. Varietal difference of leaf protein profiles in mulberry. Phytochemistry 21:1513-1518. Jia, Z., M. Tang, and J. Wu. 1999. The determination of flavonoid contents in mulberry and their scavenging effects in superoxide radicals. Food Chem. 64:555-559. Johannsen, W. 1926. Elemente der exakten erblichkeitslehre. G. Fischer, Jena, Germany. Katsumata, F. 1982. Inheritance of some of the traits in an interspecific hybrid between Morus kagayamae Koidz. and kairyonezumigaeshi (a form of Morus alba L.). J. Sericult. Sci. 51:381-388 Kaufman, L. and P. J. Rosseeuw. 1990. Finding groups in data: An introduction to cluster analysis. Wiley, New York. Linné, C. 1753. Morus, p.968. In: C. Linné (ed.). Species plantarum. Vol. 2. Stockholm, Sweden. NIAS genebank. 2009a. The list of mulberry accession in germplasm. 28 Mar. 2009. <http://www.gene.affrc.go.jp/ex-nises/mulberry/mulberryindex.html> NIAS genebank. 2009b. The character index of mulberry resource. 28 Mar. 2009. <http://www.gene.affrc.go.jp/databases-plant_search_char.php?type=99> Osuji, J. O., B. E. Okoli, D. Vuylsteke, and R. Ortiz. 1997. Multivariate pattern of quantitative trait variation in triploid banana and plantain cultivars. Sci. Hort. 71:197-202. Pereira-Lorenzo, S., J. Fernández-López, and J. Moreno-González. 1996. Variability and grouping of northwestern Spanish chestnut cultivars. I. morphological traits. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 121:183-189. Pérez, S., S. Montes, and C. Mejia. 1993. Analysis of peach germplasm in Mexico. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 118:519-524. Pérez-Gonzales, S. 1992. Associations among morphological and phonological characters representing apricot germplasm in central Mexico. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 117:486-490. Revilla, P. and W. F. Tracy. 1995. Morphological characterization and classification of open-pollinated sweet corn cultivars. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 120:112-118. Richardson, E. A., S. D. Seely, and D. R. Walker. 1974. A model for estimating the completion of rest for ‘Redhaven’ and ‘Elberta’ peach trees. HortScience 9:331-332. Rincon, F., B. Johnson, J. Crossa, and S. Taba. 1997. Identifying subsets of maize accessions by three-mode principal component analysis. Crop Sci. 37:1936-1943. Roa, A. A. 2002. Conservation status of mulberry genetic resources in India. 7 Jun. 2009. < http://www.fao.org/docrep/005/ad107e/ad107e0o.htm#TopOfPage> Rohlf, F. J. 1997. NTSYS. Numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system. Version 2.00. User guide. Setauket, New York. Sharma, A., R. Sharma, and H. Machii. 2000. Assessment of genetic diversity in a Morus germplasm collection using fluorescence-based AFLP markers. Theor. Appl. Genet. 101:1049-1055. Vavilov, N. I. 1951. The origin, variation, immunity and breeding of cultivated plants. Ronald Press, New York. Vijayan, K., P. P. Srivatsava, C. V. Nair, A. K. Awasthi, A. Tikader, B. Sreenivasa, and S. R. Urs. 2006. Molecular characterization and identification of markers associated with yield traits in mulberry using ISSR markers. Plant Breed. 125:298-301. Zhao, W., Y. Pan, Z. Zhang, S. Jia, X. Miao, and Y. Huang. 2005. Phylogeny of the genus Morus (Urticales: Moraceae) inferred from ITS and trnL-F sequences. Afr. J. Biotech. 4:563-569. Zhao, W., Y. Wang, T. Chen, G. Jia, X. Wang, J. Qi, Y. Pan, S. Wang, Z. Li, Y. Huang, Y. Pan, and Y.-H. Yang. 2007. Genetic structure of mulberry from different ecotypes revealed by ISSRs in China: An implications for conservation of local mulberry varieties. Sci. Hort. 115:47-55. Zhou, Z. and M. G. Gilbert. 2003. Moraceae, p.21-73. In: Wu, P. H. Raven and D. Hong (eds.). Flora of China Vol. 5. Science Press, Beijing, China 第三章 參考文獻 王仁助. 2003. 桑樹機能性成份簡介. 農業世界 242:34-39. 朱方容、雷扶生、胡樂山、白景彰、林強. 1997. 四倍體桑研究和應用的概述. 廣西蠶業 34:11-16. 何大彥、周明珠、何偉. 1989. 雲貴川地區桑屬植物細胞遺傳學的研究 I. 桑種及品種的染色體倍數性觀察. 蠶業科學 15:7-12. 吳雲. 1964. 我國不同桑品種的倍數性鑒定. 蠶業科學 2:165-170. 林強、朱方容、胡樂山、陳日彩、石華月. 1999. 桑樹染色體製片的直接酸解去壁法及其實用性研究. 廣西蠶業. 36:1-5. 張哲嘉. 2006. 臺灣桑樹之分類及品種改良. 臺灣園藝 52:377-392. 郭展雄、王穗虹、肖更生. 1990. 粵、桂、瓊三省區桑樹染色體數的觀察. 廣東蠶絲通訊 1990: 40-42. 陳彩雲、蕭寧馨、楊雯如、林宗賢. 2004. 臺灣水果抗氧化能力之研究. 中國園藝 50: 592(摘要). 儲瑞銀、孫曉霞. 1986. 桑屬植物細胞遺傳學的研究 I. 部份桑品種的染色體. 蠶業科學12:199-202. 蘇超、蘇利紅、朱光義、韓明齋. 2000. 桑屬植物混倍體產生的途徑及分類. 北方蠶業 21:11-12. 大澤一衛. 1916. 桑の細胞學并に實驗的研究. 蚕試報告 1:215-292. 南澤吉三郎. 1976. 栽桑學. p.127-129. 鳳鳴社. 東京. 日本. 關 博夫、押金健吾. 1963. 倍数体桑樹に関する研究 (V) 育成倍数体桑樹の組織形態学的観察. 日蚕雑 32:97-107. 關 博夫. 1959. 桑属植物の細胞学的研究. 信州大繊紀要. 20:1-91. Asano., N., E. Oseki, E. Tomioka, H. Kizu, and K. Matsui. 1994. N-containing sugars from Morus alba and their glycosidase inhibitory activities. Carbohydr. Res. 259:243-255. Banerjee, R., S. Roychowdhuri, H. Sau, B. K. Das, P. Ghosh, and B. Saratchandra. 2007. Genetic diversity and interrelationship among mulberry genotypes. J. Genet. Genomics 34:691-697. Bassi, P. 1990. Quantitative variation of nuclear DNA during plant development: A critical analysis. Biol. Rev. 65:185-225. Benett, M. D. and I.J. Leitch. 1995. Nuclear DNA amounts in angiosperms. Ann. Bot. 76:113-176. Black ,C.L. and R. L. Beckmann. 1983. The variability of nuclear DNA and its implications for polyploidy in white ash (Fraxinus Americana L.: Oleaceae). Am J Bot 70:1420-1423 Costich, D. E., R. Ortiz, T. R. Meagher, L. P. Bruederle, and N. Vorsa. 1993. Determination of ploidy level and nuclear DNA content in blueberry by flow cytometry. Theor. Appl. Genet. 86:1001-1006. De Laat, A. M. M., W. Gohde, and M. J. D. C. Vogelzang. 1987. Determination of ploidy of single plants and plant populations by flow cytometry. Plant Breed. 99:303-307. Dounce, A. L. 1955. The isolation and composition of cell nuclei and nucleoli. In: E. Chargaff and J. N. Davidson (eds.). The nucleic acids, p.93-153. Academic Press, New York. Galbraith, D. W., K. R. Harkins, J. M. Maddox, N. M. Ayres, D. P. Sharma, and E. Firoozabady. 1983. Rapid flow cytometric analysis of the cell cycle in intact plant tissues. Science 220:1049-1051. Greilhuber, J. 1998. Intraspecific variation in genome size: A critical reassessment. Ann. Bot. 82 (Suppl. A):27-35. Janaki-Ammal, E. K.1948. The origin of black mulberry. J. Royal Horticult. Soc. 73:117-120. Lin, S, H.-C. Lee, W.-H. Chen, C.-C. Chen, Y.-Y. Kao, Y.-M. Fu, Y.-H. Chen, and T.-Y. Lin. 2001. Nuclear DNA contents of Phalaenopsis sp. And Doritis pulcherrima. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 126:195-199. Laurie, D. A. and M. D. Bennett. 1985. Nuclear DNA content in the genera Zea and Sorghum. Intergeneric, interspecific and intraspecific variation. Heredity 55:307-313. Rayburn, A. L., H. J. Price, J. D. Smith, and J. R. Gold. 1985. C-band heterochromatin and DNA content in Zea mays. Amer. J. Bot. 72:1610-1617. Michaelson, M. J, H. J. Price, J. R. Ellison, and J. S. Johnston. 1991. Comparison of plant DNA contents determined by Feulgen microspectrophotometry and laser flow cytometry. Am. J. Bot. 78:183-188. Ohri, D. and A. Kumar. 1986. Nuclear DNA amounts in some tropical hardwoods. Caryologia 39:303-307. Ozias-Akins, P. and R. L. Jarret. 1994. Nuclear DNA content and ploidy levels in the genus Ipomoea. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 119:110-115. Singh, R. K. and B. D. Chaudhary. 1985. Biometrical methods in quantitative genetic analysis. Kalyani Publi., New Delhi, India. Sujathamma, P., J. Yang, and C. Lou. 2002. A comparative study on morphological and histological differences among different ploids of mulberry (Morus spp.). Canye Kexue 28:8-13. Tahara, M. 1910. Ueber die Kernteilung bei Morus. Bot. Mag. Tokyo 24: 281- 289. Yamanouchi, H., A. Koyama, T. Takyu, and T. Yoshioka. 2008. Flow cytomertric analysis of various organs and cytochimeras of mulberry (Morus spp.). J. Insect Biotechnol Sericol. 77:95-108. 第四章 參考文獻 張哲嘉. 2006. 臺灣桑樹之分類及品種改良. 臺灣園藝 52:377-392. 儲瑞銀、孫曉霞. 1986. 桑屬植物細胞遺傳學的研究 I. 部分桑品種的染色體數. 12: 199-202. 儲瑞銀、孫曉霞. 1987. 桑屬植物細胞遺傳學的研究 II. 四個桑品種的核型分析. 13: 129-132. 蔣同慶、朱勇. 1985. 二倍體桑樹的核型分析. 蠶學通訊 1985(3):9-17. 小泉源一. 1917. 桑屬植物考. 蠶試報 3:1. 大澤一衛. 1916. 桑の細胞學并に實驗的研究. 蚕試報告 1:215-292. 南澤吉三郎. 1976. 栽桑學. p.108-114. 鳳鳴社. 東京. 日本. 關 博夫. 1956. 桑樹の性染色体について. 日蚕雑. 25:191. (予報) 關 博夫. 1959. 桑属植物の細胞学的研究. 信州大繊紀要. 20:1-91. Bureau, E. 1873. Moraceae, p.211-288. In: A. De Candolle (ed.). Prodromus Systematis Naturalis Regni Vegetabilis. Vol. 17. Bibliople apud medicine academiam, Paris, France. Carvalho, R., W. S. Soares Filho, A. C. Brasileiro-Vidal, and M. Guerra. 2005. The relationships among lemons, limes and citron: a chromosomal comparison. Cytogenet Genome Res. 109:276-282. Charlesworth, D. 2002. Plant sex determination and sex chromosomes. Heredity 88:94-101. Dandin, S. B. 1998. Mulberry: a versatile biosource in the service of mankind. Acta Sericologica Sinica 24:109-113. Dobigny, G, J-F Ducroz, T. J. Robinson, and V. Volobouev. 2004. Cytogenetics and cladistics. Syst. Biol. 53:470-484. Gill, B. S.and R. C. Gupta. 1979. Cytological studies in the sex types of Morus alba L. (Moraceae). Current Sci. 48:35-36. Guerra, M. 2008. Chromosome numbers in plant cytotaxonomy: concepts and implications. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 120:339-350. Linné, C. 1753. Morus, p.968. In: C. Linné (ed.). Species plantarum. Vol. 2. Stockholm, Sweden. IPNI. 2009. The International Plant Names Index: Morus L. 1 Jun. 2009. < http://www.ipni.org > Kao, F.-I., Y.-Y Cheng., T.-Y. Chow, H.-H. Chen, S.-M. Liu, C.-H. Cheng, and M.-C.Chung. 2006. An integrated map of Oryza sativa L. chromosome 5. Theor. Appl. Genet. 112:891-902. Kumekawa, N. and K. Oshigane. 2004. Fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis of chromosomes of mulberry species with the diploid genome. Genes Genet. Syst. 79:387. (Abstract) Ming, R., Q. Yu, and P. H. Moore. 2008. Sex determination in papaya. Seminars cell dev. Biol. 18:401-408. NIAS genebank. The list of mulberry accession in germplasm. 28 Mar. 2009. <http://www.gene.affrc.go.jp/ex-nises/mulberry/mulberryindex.html> OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). 2003. Draft Consensus Document on the Biology of Carica papaya (L.) (Papaya). 2 Jun. 2009. <http://www.oecd.org/home/0,3305,en_2649_201185_1_1_1_1_1,00.html> Oginuma, K. and H. Tobe. 1995. Karyomorphology of some Moraceae and Cecropiaceae (Urticales). J. Plant Res. 108:313-326. Renner, S.S. and R.E. Ricklefs. 1995. Dioecy and its correlates in the flowering plants. Amer. J. Bot. 82:596-606. Sinoto, Y. 1929. Chromosome studies in some dioecious plants with special reference to Allosome. Cytologia 1:109-199. Susheelamma, B. N., J. S. Kumar, S. B. Dandin, M. S. Jolly, K. Sengupta, and R. Raju. 1990. Karyomorphological studies in a few exotic varieties of genus Morus L. Cytologia 55:107-114. Sybenga, J. 1992. The somatic chromosome complement: karyotype analysis, p.65-100. In: J. Sybenga (ed.). Cytogenetics in plant breeding. Springer-Verlag, New York, USA Tahara, M. 1910. Ueber die Kernteilung bei Morus. Bot. Mag. Tokyo 24: 281- 289. Yampolsky, C. and H. Yampolsky. 1922. Distribution of sex forms in the phanerogamic flora. Bibliotheca Genet. 3:1-62. Zhao, W., Y. Pan, Z. Zhang, S. Jia, X. Miao, and Y. Huang. 2005. Phlogeny of the genus Morus (Urticales: Moraceae) inferred from ITS and trnL-F sequences. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 4:563-569. Zhao, W., Y. Wang, T. Chen, G. Jia, X. Wang, J. Qi, Y. Pang, S. Wang, Z. Li, Y. Huang, Y. Pan, and Y.H. Yang. 2007. Genetic structure of mulberry from different ecotypes revealed by ISSRs in China: An implications for conservation of local mulberry varieties. Sci. Hort. 115: 47–55. 第五章 參考文獻 吳登楨. 1977. 桑樹之品種改良. 科學農業 25:242-244. 徐克學. 1996. 數量分類學. 水產出版社. 基隆巿. 翁儷倩. 2001. 柑橘遺傳歧異性之分析. 國立臺灣大學園藝所碩士論文. 90pp. 張哲嘉. 2006. 臺灣桑樹之分類及品種改良. 臺灣園藝 52:377-392. 曾富生、吳登楨. 1979. 臺灣野生桑樹（Morus acidosa Griff.）農藝性狀之變異. 興大農藝學報 4:39-45. Dandin, S. B. 1998. Mulberry: a versatile biosource in the service of mankind. Acta Sericologica Sinica 24:109-113. Dobigny, G, J-F Ducroz, T. J. Robinson, and V. Volobouev. 2004. Cytogenetics and cladistics. Syst. Biol. 53:470-484. Ercisli, S. and E. Orhan. 2007. Chemical composition of white (Morus alba), red (Morus rubra) and black (Morus nigra) mulberry fruits. Food Chem. 103: 1380-1384. Guerra, M. 2008. Chromosome numbers in plant cytotaxonomy: concepts and implications. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 120:339-350. Özgen M., S. Serçe, and C. Kaya. 2009. Phytochemical and antioxidant properties or anthocyanin-rich Morus nigra and Morus rubra fruits. Sci. Hort. 119:275-279. Venkataraman, K. 1972. Wood phenolics in the chemotaxonomy of the Moraceae. Phytochemistry 11: 1571-1586. Zhao, W., Y. Wang, T. Chen, G. Jia, X. Wang, J. Qi, Y. Pang, S. Wang, Z. Li, Y. Huang, Y. Pan, and Y.H. Yang. 2007. Genetic structure of mulberry from different ecotypes revealed by ISSRs in China: An implications for conservation of local mulberry varieties. Sci. Hort. 115:47-55. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/9107 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 摘要
桑樹（Morus spp.）已引入臺灣多年，為具發展潛力之多年生作物，多為雌雄異株，行異花授粉且分布廣泛，遺傳背景複雜，其分類尚待釐清。為瞭解臺灣桑樹種原間之親緣關係，本研究利用營養性狀進行歧異度分析，並以流式細胞儀及核型分析確認其倍體數，俾建立臺灣桑樹細胞遺傳資料庫。 自苗栗區農業改良場桑樹種原庫選出26個品種（系），在2008年調查記錄各品種（系）之21組營養性狀。經主成份分析及群集分析，受試品種（系）可分為三群（一）長果桑(Morus laevigata)，（二）廣東桑(M. atropurpurea)、山桑(M. bombycis)、島桑(M. australis)及臺灣桑(M. formosensis)，及（三）白桑(M. alba)及魯桑(M. latifolia)，群內親緣相近。從中選出葉寬、葉長葉寬比、葉柄寬、休眠需冷量、生長中芽形、休眠芽形、葉色、葉緣及葉尖等九個主要代表性狀，歸納出不受限於株性之桑樹檢索表，可供分類使用。 為估算種原倍體數，以流式細胞儀進行分析，結果顯示參試品種（系）可分為兩類，二倍體包括山桑、白桑、魯桑、島桑、臺灣桑及廣東桑，DNA含量為0.61-0.71 pg/2C。70C006 (M. laevigata) 為三倍體，DNA含量為1.06 pg/2C。67C001 (M. australis) 則有基因組各為0.63 pg/2C的二倍體和0.98 pg/2C的三倍體株，倍體數之差異亦會表現在形態上，三倍體植株較二倍體植株大。 桑樹13個品種（系）之染色體核型一致，14對染色體中，僅第2、5及14對為次中位中節，其餘為中位中節，以螢光原位雜交技術（Fluorescence in situ hybridization, FISH）標定白桑、島桑、廣東桑及長果桑之rDNA基因座位置，分佈位置一致，種間無明顯差異。不同株性的品種（系）中，唯島桑及雜交桑之雄株品種（系），在第3對染色體有一條染色體之短臂染色深，但白桑不同株性品種（系）間則無條帶差異。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Abstract
The mulberry (Morus spp.), a perennial crop valued for its economoical importance, had led it a potential crop in the future. Because of its dioecious and cross-pollination nature, a complex genetic background of mulberry cultivars has been developed in Taiwan and the original classification system may need to be reexamined. In this study, the genetic relationship of the mulberry collection in Taiwan has been established by principal component analysis and clustering analysis based on vegetative traits. Besides, the ploidy and karyotype have also been examined to enrich the cytogenetic data base. Twenty-six mulberry accessions from Miaoli District Agricultural Research and Extension Station (MDARES) were selected and 21 morphological characters were evaluated in 2008. Data were used for principal component analysis and clustering analysis. Accessions were grouped into three major clusters: (1) Morus laevigata, (2) M. atropurpurea, M. bombycis, M. australis, M. formosensis, and (3) M. alba and M. latifolia. Nine sets of morphological characters including leaf width, leaf lengths : widths ratio, petiole widths, chilling requirement, bud shape, dormant bud shape, mature leaf color, shape of leaf margin and leaf tip, were chosen to present a new key to mulberry in Taiwan, which is suitable for all sex types. The ploidy of 26 mulberry accessions was determined by flow cytometer. Accessions of M. bombycis, M. alba, M. latifolia, M. australis, M. formosensis, and M. aropurpurea were diploids with genome sizes ranging from 0.61 to 0.71 pg/2C. Aceesions 70C006 (M. laevigata) was a triploid with a genome size of 1.06 pg/2C. Accession 67C001 (M. australis) comprised diploid and triploid with genome size of 0.63 pg/2C and 0.98 pg/2C, respectively. The morphological characters were bigger in triploid also revealed the difference in ploidy leve. The karyotypes of 13 accessions were similar. Among the 14 pairs of chromosomes, chromosome 2, 5, 14 are submetacentric chromosomes while the others are metacentric. Fluorescence in situ hybridization of 5S rDNA and 18S-5.8S-25S rDNA in four species also revealed the resemblance among M. species. In M. australis and some mulberry hybrids, one p-arm of choromosome 3 showed dark staining in male but not in female plants. However, the difference in banding pattern between sex types was not observed in M. alba. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-20T20:09:28Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-98-R96628127-1.pdf: 1580864 bytes, checksum: d04791b68d2ea68319bff1f149f30658 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2009 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 目錄 Contents
目錄 i 圖目錄 iii 表目錄 iv 摘要 v Abstract vi 第一章 總論 1 Chapter 1. General introduction 1.1前言 2 1.2桑樹簡介 3 1.3桑屬植物之分類 4 1.4數量分類學 9 1.5桑樹細胞遺傳學之研究 12 1.6結論及試驗假說 15 1.7參考文獻 17 第二章 臺灣桑樹之歧異度分析 24 Chapter 2. Genetic diversity of mulberry (Morus spp.) in Taiwan 2.1摘要 25 2.2前言 26 2.3材料與方法 27 2.4結果 32 2.5討論 43 2.6結論 47 2.7參考文獻 48 2.8 Abstract 51 第三章 桑樹倍數體及DNA含量之鑑定 52 Chapter 3. Determining ploidy and DNA content of mulberry (Morus spp.) 3.1摘要 53 3.2前言 54 3.3材料與方法 55 3.4結果 57 3.5討論 59 3.6結論 65 3.7參考文獻 66 3.8 Abstract 69 第四章 臺灣桑樹之核型分析及rDNA染色圖譜 70 Chapter 4. Karyotype analysis and physical mapping of rDNA of mulberry (Morus spp.) in Taiwan 4.1摘要 71 4.2前言 72 4.3材料與方法 73 4.4結果 76 4.5討論 88 4.6結論 91 4.7參考文獻 92 4.8 Abstract 95 第五章 總結及未來展望 96 附錄 101 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.title | 臺灣桑樹種原分析 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Germplasm analysis of mulberry (Morus spp.) in Taiwan | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 97-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.coadvisor | 楊雯如(Wen-Ju Yang),張哲嘉(Jer-Chia Chang) | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 鍾美珠(Mei-Chu Chung) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 主成份分析,群集分析,流式細胞儀分析,核型分析,螢光原位雜交, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Principal component analysis,clustering analysis,flow cytometric analysis,karyotypic analysis,fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), | en |
| dc.relation.page | 107 | |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2009-07-30 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 園藝學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 園藝暨景觀學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-98-1.pdf | 1.54 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。