請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/90268
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 毛慧芬 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.advisor | Hui-Fen Mao | en |
dc.contributor.author | 陳愉滋 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author | Yu-Tzu Chen | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-09-25T16:11:32Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-11-10 | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2023-09-25 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2023 | - |
dc.date.submitted | 2023-06-29 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | 任純慧、陳學志、練竑初、卓淑玲 (2004)。創造力測量的輔助工具:中文遠距聯想量表的發展。應用心理研究21期P.195 – 217。
花茂棽、張本聖、林克能、楊建銘、盧小蓉、陳心怡 (2005)。魏氏記憶量表第三版(WMS–III)中文版。台北:中國行為科學社。 陳榮華、陳心怡等 (2002)。魏氏智力量表第三版(WAIS–III)中文版。台北:中國行為科學社。 郭曉燕、花茂棽 (2015)。彩色路徑描繪測驗-中文指導版手冊。台北:中國行為科學社。 Basak, C., Qin, S., & O'Connell, M. A. (2020). Differential effects of cognitive training modules in healthy aging and mild cognitive impairment: A comprehensive meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Psychol Aging, 35(2), 220-249. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000442 Bevan, B., Gutwill, J. P., Petrich, M., & Wilkinson, K. (2015). Learning through STEM‐rich tinkering: Findings from a jointly negotiated research project taken up in practice. Science Education, 99(1), 98-120. Borella, E., Carretti, B., Riboldi, F., & De Beni, R. (2010). Working memory training in older adults: evidence of transfer and maintenance effects. Psychol Aging, 25(4), 767-778. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020683 Brophy, D. R. (2001). Comparing the attributes, activities, and performance of divergent, convergent, and combination thinkers. Creativity research journal, 13(3-4), 439-455. Buitenweg, J. I. V., van de Ven, R. M., Prinssen, S., Murre, J. M. J., & Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2017). Cognitive Flexibility Training: A Large-Scale Multimodal Adaptive Active-Control Intervention Study in Healthy Older Adults. Front Hum Neurosci, 11, 529. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00529 Cahn-Weiner, D. A., Farias, S. T., Julian, L., Harvey, D. J., Kramer, J. H., Reed, B. R., Mungas, D., Wetzel, M., & Chui, H. (2007). Cognitive and neuroimaging predictors of instrumental activities of daily living. J Int Neuropsychol Soc, 13(5), 747-757. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1355617707070853 Ching-Teng, Y. (2019). Effect of board game activities on cognitive function improvement among older adults in adult day care centers. Soc Work Health Care, 58(9), 825-838. https://doi.org/10.1080/00981389.2019.1656143 Cohen, R. A., Marsiske, M. M., & Smith, G. E. (2019). Neuropsychology of aging. Handb Clin Neurol, 167, 149-180. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-804766-8.00010-8 d'Astous, A., & Gagnon, K. (2007). An inquiry into the factors that impact on consumer appreciation of a board game. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 24, 80-89. https://doi.org/10.1108/07363760710737085 Diamond, A. (2013). Executive functions. Annu Rev Psychol, 64, 135-168. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750 Ehlhardt, L. A., Sohlberg, M. M., Kennedy, M., Coelho, C., Ylvisaker, M., Turkstra, L., & Yorkston, K. (2008). Evidence-based practice guidelines for instructing individuals with neurogenic memory impairments: what have we learned in the past 20 years? Neuropsychol Rehabil, 18(3), 300-342. https://doi.org/10.1080/09602010701733190 Fried, L. P., Carlson, M. C., Freedman, M., Frick, K. D., Glass, T. A., Hill, J., McGill, S., Rebok, G. W., Seeman, T., Tielsch, J., Wasik, B. A., & Zeger, S. (2004). A social model for health promotion for an aging population: initial evidence on the Experience Corps model. J Urban Health, 81(1), 64-78. https://doi.org/10.1093/jurban/jth094 Fried, L. P., Carlson, M. C., McGill, S., Seeman, T., Xue, Q. L., Frick, K., Tan, E., Tanner, E. K., Barron, J., Frangakis, C., Piferi, R., Martinez, I., Gruenewald, T., Martin, B. K., Berry-Vaughn, L., Stewart, J., Dickersin, K., Willging, P. R., & Rebok, G. W. (2013). Experience Corps: a dual trial to promote the health of older adults and children's academic success. Contemp Clin Trials, 36(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2013.05.003 Friedman, D., Nessler, D., Johnson, R., Jr., Ritter, W., & Bersick, M. (2008). Age-related changes in executive function: an event-related potential (ERP) investigation of task-switching. Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn, 15(1), 95-128. https://doi.org/10.1080/13825580701533769 Friston, K., FitzGerald, T., Rigoli, F., Schwartenbeck, P., J, O. D., & Pezzulo, G. (2016). Active inference and learning. Neurosci Biobehav Rev, 68, 862-879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.06.022 Gajewski, P. D., Ferdinand, N. K., Kray, J., & Falkenstein, M. (2018). Understanding sources of adult age differences in task switching: Evidence from behavioral and ERP studies. Neurosci Biobehav Rev, 92, 255-275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.05.029 Goghari, V. M., & Lawlor-Savage, L. (2017). Comparison of Cognitive Change after Working Memory Training and Logic and Planning Training in Healthy Older Adults. Front Aging Neurosci, 9, 39. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2017.00039 Gomar, J. J., Harvey, P. D., Bobes-Bascaran, M. T., Davies, P., & Goldberg, T. E. (2011). Development and cross-validation of the UPSA short form for the performance-based functional assessment of patients with mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer disease. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry, 19(11), 915-922. https://doi.org/10.1097/JGP.0b013e3182011846 Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. Hartman, M., Steketee, M. C., Silva, S., Lanning, K., & Andersson, C. (2003). Wisconsin Card Sorting Test performance in schizophrenia: the role of working memory. Schizophr Res, 63(3), 201-217. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0920-9964(02)00353-5 Heaton, R. K., Chelune, G. J., Talley, J. L., Kay, G. G., & Curtiss, G. (1993). Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST): manual: revised and expanded. Psychological Assessment Resources (PAR). Ikezaki, H., Hashimoto, M., Ishikawa, T., Fukuhara, R., Tanaka, H., Yuki, S., Kuribayashi, K., Hotta, M., Koyama, A., Ikeda, M., & Takebayashi, M. (2020). Relationship between executive dysfunction and neuropsychiatric symptoms and impaired instrumental activities of daily living among patients with very mild Alzheimer's disease. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry, 35(8), 877-887. https://doi.org/10.1002/gps.5308 Karbach, J., & Kray, J. (2009). How useful is executive control training? Age differences in near and far transfer of task-switching training. Dev Sci, 12(6), 978-990. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00846.x Kelly, M. E. (2020). The Potential of a Relational Training Intervention to Improve Older Adults' Cognition. Behav Anal Pract, 13(3), 684-697. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-020-00415-0 Kelly, M. E., Loughrey, D., Lawlor, B. A., Robertson, I. H., Walsh, C., & Brennan, S. (2014). The impact of cognitive training and mental stimulation on cognitive and everyday functioning of healthy older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ageing Res Rev, 15, 28-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2014.02.004 Kuo, C. Y., Huang, Y. M., & Yeh, Y. Y. (2018). Let's Play Cards: Multi-Component Cognitive Training With Social Engagement Enhances Executive Control in Older Adults. Front Psychol, 9, 2482. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02482 Lawton, M. P., & Brody, E. M. (1969). Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist, 9(3), 179-186. Li, J., Li, C., Chia, B. X., Chen, X., Pham, T. P., & Theng, Y. L. (2021). Exergaming as a Community Program for Older Adults: The Effects of Social Interaction and Competitive Information. J Aging Phys Act, 29(3), 466-474. https://doi.org/10.1123/japa.2020-0188 Li, Q., & Wu, C. (2022). Social Interaction, Lifestyle, and Depressive Status: Mediators in the Longitudinal Relationship between Cognitive Function and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Disability among Older Adults. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 19(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19074235 Liozidou, A., Potagas, C., Papageorgiou, S. G., & Zalonis, I. (2012). The role of working memory and information processing speed on wisconsin card sorting test performance in Parkinson disease without dementia. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol, 25(4), 215-221. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891988712466456 Martin, M. M., & Rubin, R. B. (1995). A new measure of cognitive flexibility. Psychological reports, 76(2), 623-626. McDonough, I. M., Haber, S., Bischof, G. N., & Park, D. C. (2015). The Synapse Project: Engagement in mentally challenging activities enhances neural efficiency. Restor Neurol Neurosci, 33(6), 865-882. https://doi.org/10.3233/rnn-150533 Miles, S., Howlett, C. A., Berryman, C., Nedeljkovic, M., Moseley, G. L., & Phillipou, A. (2021). Considerations for using the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test to assess cognitive flexibility. Behav Res Methods, 53(5), 2083-2091. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01551-3 Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., Howerter, A., & Wager, T. D. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex "Frontal Lobe" tasks: a latent variable analysis. Cogn Psychol, 41(1), 49-100. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1999.0734 Moreau, D., & Conway, A. R. (2013). Cognitive enhancement: a comparative review of computerized and athletic training programs. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 6(1), 155-183. Moreau, D., & Conway, A. R. (2014). The case for an ecological approach to cognitive training. Trends Cogn Sci, 18(7), 334-336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2014.03.009 Mozolic, J. L., Long, A. B., Morgan, A. R., Rawley-Payne, M., & Laurienti, P. J. (2011). A cognitive training intervention improves modality-specific attention in a randomized controlled trial of healthy older adults. Neurobiol Aging, 32(4), 655-668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2009.04.013 Nguyen, L., Murphy, K., & Andrews, G. (2019). Cognitive and neural plasticity in old age: A systematic review of evidence from executive functions cognitive training. Ageing Res Rev, 53, 100912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2019.100912 Palmiero, M., Fusi, G., Crepaldi, M., Borsa, V. M., & Rusconi, M. L. (2022). Divergent thinking and the core executive functions: a state-of-the-art review. Cogn Process, 23(3), 341-366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-022-01091-4 Park, D. C., & Bischof, G. N. (2013). The aging mind: neuroplasticity in response to cognitive training. Dialogues Clin Neurosci, 15(1), 109-119. https://doi.org/10.31887/DCNS.2013.15.1/dpark Park, D. C., Lodi-Smith, J., Drew, L., Haber, S., Hebrank, A., Bischof, G. N., & Aamodt, W. (2014). The impact of sustained engagement on cognitive function in older adults: the Synapse Project. Psychol Sci, 25(1), 103-112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613499592 Park, D. C., & Reuter-Lorenz, P. (2009). The adaptive brain: aging and neurocognitive scaffolding. Annu Rev Psychol, 60, 173-196. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093656 Park, S., Downer, B., Nam, S., Bae, S., & Hong, I. (2022). Association Between Social Participation and Cognitive Function in Community-Dwelling Adults. OTJR (Thorofare N J), 42(4), 344-352. https://doi.org/10.1177/15394492221113506 Parr, T., & Friston, K. J. (2017). Working memory, attention, and salience in active inference. Sci Rep, 7(1), 14678. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-15249-0 Pezzulo, G., Cartoni, E., Rigoli, F., Pio-Lopez, L., & Friston, K. (2016). Active Inference, epistemic value, and vicarious trial and error. Learn Mem, 23(7), 322-338. https://doi.org/10.1101/lm.041780.116 Ratner, E., & Atkinson, D. (2015). Why Cognitive Training and Brain Games Will Not Prevent or Forestall Dementia. J Am Geriatr Soc, 63(12), 2612-2614. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.1_13825 Reijnders, J., van Heugten, C., & van Boxtel, M. (2013). Cognitive interventions in healthy older adults and people with mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review. Ageing Res Rev, 12(1), 263-275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2012.07.003 Reuter Lorenz, K. W. S., Sherry Willis. (2016). Chapter 13 Executive Functions and Neurocognitive Aging. Handbook of the Psychology of Aging (Eighth Edition). In Academic Press (pp. 245-262). Reuter-Lorenz, P. A., & Cappell, K. A. (2008). Neurocognitive aging and the compensation hypothesis. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17, 177-182. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00570.x Salthouse, T. A., Fristoe, N., McGuthry, K. E., & Hambrick, D. Z. (1998). Relation of task switching to speed, age, and fluid intelligence. Psychol Aging, 13(3), 445-461. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.13.3.445 Simon, S. S., Castellani, M., Belleville, S., Dwolatzky, T., Hampstead, B. M., & Bahar-Fuchs, A. (2020). The design, evaluation, and reporting on non-pharmacological, cognition-oriented treatments for older adults: Results of a survey of experts. Alzheimers Dement (N Y), 6(1), e12024. https://doi.org/10.1002/trc2.12024 Stern, Y. (2002). What is cognitive reserve? Theory and research application of the reserve concept. J Int Neuropsychol Soc, 8(3), 448-460. Stern, Y., Habeck, C., Moeller, J., Scarmeas, N., Anderson, K. E., Hilton, H. J., Flynn, J., Sackeim, H., & van Heertum, R. (2005). Brain networks associated with cognitive reserve in healthy young and old adults. Cereb Cortex, 15(4), 394-402. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhh142 Stine-Morrow, E. A., Parisi, J. M., Morrow, D. G., & Park, D. C. (2008). The effects of an engaged lifestyle on cognitive vitality: a field experiment. Psychol Aging, 23(4), 778-786. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014341 Stine-Morrow, E. A. L., Payne, B. R., Roberts, B. W., Kramer, A. F., Morrow, D. G., Payne, L., Hill, P. L., Jackson, J. J., Gao, X., Noh, S. R., Janke, M. C., & Parisi, J. M. (2014). Training versus engagement as paths to cognitive enrichment with aging. Psychol Aging, 29(4), 891-906. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038244 Tennstedt, S. L., & Unverzagt, F. W. (2013). The ACTIVE study: study overview and major findings. J Aging Health, 25(8 Suppl), 3s-20s. https://doi.org/10.1177/0898264313518133 Toglia, J. P. (1991). Generalization of treatment: a multicontext approach to cognitive perceptual impairment in adults with brain injury. Am J Occup Ther, 45(6), 505-516. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.45.6.505 Tsai, C. F., Lee, W. J., Wang, S. J., Shia, B. C., Nasreddine, Z., & Fuh, J. L. (2012). Psychometrics of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and its subscales: validation of the Taiwanese version of the MoCA and an item response theory analysis. Int Psychogeriatr, 24(4), 651-658. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1041610211002298 Tsai, C. L., & Wang, W. L. (2015). Exercise-mode-related changes in task-switching performance in the elderly. Front Behav Neurosci, 9, 56. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00056 van de Ven, R. M., Schmand, B., Groet, E., Veltman, D. J., & Murre, J. M. (2015). The effect of computer-based cognitive flexibility training on recovery of executive function after stroke: rationale, design and methods of the TAPASS study. BMC Neurol, 15, 144. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-015-0397-y Vandierendonck, A., Liefooghe, B., & Verbruggen, F. (2010). Task switching: interplay of reconfiguration and interference control. Psychol Bull, 136(4), 601-626. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019791 Vaughan, L., & Giovanello, K. (2010). Executive function in daily life: Age-related influences of executive processes on instrumental activities of daily living. Psychol Aging, 25(2), 343-355. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017729 Ybarra, O., Burnstein, E., Winkielman, P., Keller, M. C., Manis, M., Chan, E., & Rodriguez, J. (2008). Mental exercising through simple socializing: social interaction promotes general cognitive functioning. Pers Soc Psychol Bull, 34(2), 248-259. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167207310454 Yun, S., & Ryu, S. (2022). The Effects of Cognitive-Based Interventions in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Iran J Public Health, 51(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.18502/ijph.v51i1.8286 Zelazo, P. D. (2020). Executive Function and Psychopathology: A Neurodevelopmental Perspective. Annu Rev Clin Psychol, 16, 431-454. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-072319-024242 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/90268 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 背景:健康長者認知訓練型態雖多元,但大多研究的訓練成效具專一性,探討何種認知訓練型態或內容有較佳的訓練成效及促進成效轉移的文獻卻仍有限。認知彈性是較高階的認知功能,與長者日常生活功能表現最相關。本研究假設在執行高階的認知彈性活動時,因需整合低階的認知過程以完成任務,可能使認知訓練成效轉移到其他未特別訓練的認知面向。本研究應用之動手樂活動便以認知彈性為訓練目標能力,讓長者自發性主動思考問題解決方式,或許可成為轉移效果較佳的新興認知促進方案。
目的:探討動手樂活動與桌遊活動訓練方案,對於促進社區認知正常長者認知彈性、其他認知功能(注意力、記憶力等)與日常生活功能之立即效益,並進而探討強調主動推理導向的動手樂活動,在認知彈性上的訓練成效,是否較典型桌遊活動具較佳的轉移效果。 方法:本研究為隨機對照試驗。招募臺灣北部社區健康長者,並隨機分派至動手樂活動組(實驗組)或桌遊活動組(對照組)。兩組皆進行2小時/週,共12週之動手樂活動或桌遊活動方案,並於課程結束後參與後測。本研究以威氏康辛卡牌分類測驗、交替任務測驗及認知彈性量表評估認知彈性,其他認知功能評估工具包含:魏氏智力/記憶量表(知覺組織、語文理解、訊息處理、短期記憶、工作記憶)、遠距創造測驗(聚合性思考)、用途替代測驗(發散性思考)、彩色路徑測驗(執行功能),並以簡短版技能表現評量評估工具性日常生活功能。 結果:共24位長者完成後測,動手樂活動組11位,桌遊活動組13位。介入後,動手樂活動組於認知彈性具正向效益(p =.075, d =.77),且成效可轉移的認知面向包含:知覺組織(p =.048, d =.59)、短期記憶(p =.009-.047, d =.82-1.25)、聚合性思考(p =.074, d =.89)、發散性思考(p =.059-.099, d =.35-.53)、執行功能(p =.041, d =.30)。桌遊活動組認知彈性指標未顯著進步,成效可轉移的認知面向包含工作記憶(p=.091, d=.66)與執行功能(p=.033, d =.47)。整體而言,動手樂活動訓練成效可轉移的面向較桌遊多,其中發散性思考(p =.003-.047, d =.86-1.31)與短期記憶(p =.093, d =.78)的轉移效果更優於桌遊。然而,動手樂活動與桌遊活動於工具性日常活動之成效可能因工具敏感性不足而未顯著變化。 結論:強調主動推理導向的動手樂活動,除在認知彈性具正向效果,成效亦可轉移至較多種認知面向(知覺組織、短期記憶、執行功能、聚合性思考及發散性思考),可能是較推薦應用於健康長者的認知促進模式。然由於樣本數較小,仍須後續探究。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Background: Various types of cognitive intervention for healthy older adults are developed, yet most of them show specificity of training effect, and the literature on the effectiveness or transfer effects comparison between methods is still limited. Based on previous studies, cognitive flexibility is a higher-level cognitive function closely related to the daily function of older adults. This study hypothesized that the integration of lower-level cognitive processes was required to complete tasks when engaging in cognitive flexibility activities. Thus, the training effects may transfer to other untargeted cognitive domains. "Tinkering Activities," focusing on cognitive flexibility and encouraging active problem-solving, may serve as a cognitive intervention approach with better transfer effects.
Objective: This study aimed to (1) explore the effectiveness of Tinkering Activities and Board game on cognitive flexibility, other cognitive functions (e.g., attention, memory, etc.), and daily function in older adults; (2) investigate whether an active inference-oriented Tinkering Activities has better transfer effects than a typical Board game. Method: This study is a randomized controlled trial. Participants were recruited from communities in northern Taiwan and randomly assigned to the Tinkering group (experimental group) or the Board game group (control group). A two-hour session was provided weekly for 12 weeks for each group. Participants finished post-tests after the intervention. We used the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, the Task Switching, and the Cognitive Flexibility Scale to assess cognitive flexibility. Other cognitive measures included the Wechsler Intelligence/Memory Scale (perceptual organization, verbal comprehension, information processing, short-term memory, working memory), the Remote Association Test (convergent thinking), the Alternative Uses Test (divergent thinking), and the Color Trails Test (executive function). The Brief UCSD Performance-Based Skills Assessment was used to measure instrumental activities of daily living. Results: 24 participants completed the post-test, with 11 participants in the Tinkering group and 13 in the Board game group. After the intervention, the Tinkering group showed positive within-group effects on cognitive flexibility (Task Switching) (p = .075, d = .77). The transfer effects were observed in the perceptual organization (p = .048, d = .59), short-term memory (p = .009-.047, d = .82-1.25), convergent thinking (p = .074, d = .89), and executive function (p = .041, d = .30). The Board game group did not show improvement in cognitive flexibility, but transfer effects were observed in working memory (p = .091, d = .66) and executive function (p = .033, d = .47). The transfer effects of the Tinkering group in divergent thinking (p = .003-.047, d = .86-1.31) and short-term memory (p = .093, d = .78) were even better than those of the Board game group. Tinkering Activities generally showed superior transfer effects compared to the typical Board game approach. However, potentially due to the insufficient tool sensitivity, the improvement in instrumental activities of daily living were insignificant for both groups. Conclusions: Active inference-oriented Tinkering Activities showed positive effects on cognitive flexibility and demonstrated transfer effects to multiple untargeted cognitive functions. These findings suggested that the Tinkering Activities program may be better recommended for enhancing cognitive functions in healthy older adults. However, further studies are still needed due to the small sample size. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2023-09-25T16:11:31Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2023-09-25T16:11:32Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員審定書 i
致謝 ii 中文摘要 iii Abstract v 目錄 vii 圖目錄 ix 表目錄 x 第一章 緒論 1 第二章 文獻回顧 3 第一節 認知彈性為維持長者生活功能之關鍵能力 3 第二節 支持長者認知促進的理論 4 第三節 健康長者認知訓練轉移效果研究現況與限制 5 第四節 影響轉移效果的因素 6 第五節 情境式認知訓練團體的研究現況 10 第六節 動手樂活動設計特性 11 第七節 文獻回顧總結 13 第八節 研究目的與假設 14 第三章 研究方法 18 第一節 研究對象 18 第二節 研究設計 18 第三節 研究工具 19 第四節 介入內容 27 第五節 研究流程 33 第六節 資料分析 34 第四章 研究結果 36 第一節 樣本描述與初始資料 36 第二節 認知彈性之立即效益 39 第三節 其他認知功能之立即效益與轉移效果 47 第四節 工具性日常活動之立即效益與轉移效果 49 第五章 討論 54 第一節 動手樂活動於認知彈性具正向效益 54 第二節 主動推理導向認知促進方案較典型認知訓練助於成效轉移 56 第三節 動手樂活動於聚合性與發散性思考之轉移效果 58 第四節 工具性日常活動之轉移效果有限 58 第五節 社交互動於認知訓練的影響 59 第六節 研究限制 60 第七節 實務應用與未來研究建議 61 第六章 結論 62 參考文獻 63 附錄一:臨床試驗/研究許可書 70 附錄二:ClinicalTrials.gov PRS Receipt 71 附錄三:前後測分數散佈圖 78 | - |
dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
dc.title | 探討以動手樂活動為基礎之認知促進方案於社區長者之成效轉移效果 | zh_TW |
dc.title | The Transfer Effect of Tinkering Activity-Based Cognitive Intervention for Community Dwelling Older Adults | en |
dc.type | Thesis | - |
dc.date.schoolyear | 111-2 | - |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 吳恩賜;余家斌;吳建德 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Joshua Goh Oon Soo;Chia-Pin Yu;Chien-Te Wu | en |
dc.subject.keyword | 老人,認知訓練,轉移效果,認知彈性,主動推理, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Older Adults,Cognitive Intervention,Transfer Effect,Cognitive Flexibility,Active Inference, | en |
dc.relation.page | 85 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202301172 | - |
dc.rights.note | 未授權 | - |
dc.date.accepted | 2023-06-30 | - |
dc.contributor.author-college | 醫學院 | - |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 職能治療學系 | - |
顯示於系所單位: | 職能治療學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-111-2.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 7.79 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。