請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/90106
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 陸怡蕙 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.advisor | Yir-Hueih Luh | en |
dc.contributor.author | 林育聖 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author | Yu-Sheng Lin | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-09-22T17:26:25Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-11-09 | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2023-09-22 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2023 | - |
dc.date.submitted | 2023-08-10 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | 統一超商股份有限公司(2022)。2021統一超商永續報告書。上網日期:2023年5月23日。檢自:https://www.7-11.com.tw/company/csr/images/report/2021_report_all_CH.pdf
全家便利商店股份有限公司(2022)。全家就是你家FamilyMart 2021永續報告書 Sustainability Report。上網日期:2023年5月23日。檢自:https://www.family.com.tw/newenterprise/csrAdmin/images/article-reportsection/20220623021433_file.pdf 泰山企業股份有限公司(2022)。永續報告書2021 ESG。上網日期:2023年5月23日。檢自:https://www.taisun.com.tw/download/%e6%b3%b0%e5%b1%b1%e4%bc%81%e6%a5%ad2021esg%e5%a0%b1%e5%91%8a%e6%9b%b8/?wpdmdl=14286&refresh=64bcfb930ff8a1690106771 統一企業股份有限公司(2022)。統一企業2021 ESG REPORT永續報告書。上網日期:2023年5月23日。檢自:https://esg.sp88.tw/upload/pj/202212101324547752.pdf 全聯實業股份有限公司(2022)。2021全聯福利中心企業社會責任績效報告書。上網日期:2023年5月23日。檢自:http://event.pxmart.com.tw/activity/CSR/pxreport/assets/2021.pdf 網路家庭國際資訊股份有限公司(2022)。PChome ONLINE 2021永續報告書Sustainability Report。上網日期:2023年5月23日。檢自:https://corp.pchome.tw/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/2021PChome%E6%B0%B8%E7%BA%8C%E5%A0%B1%E5%91%8A%E6%9B%B8_final.pdf 富邦媒體科技股份有限公司(2022)。富邦媒體科技momo.com Inc. 2021永續報告書。上網日期:2023年5月23日。檢自:https://corp.momo.com.tw/file/csr/csrReport/momo_2021ESGreport.pdf 台新金融控股股份有限公司(2022)。台新金控2021永續報告書。上網日期:2023年5月23日。檢自:https://www.taishinholdings.com.tw/tsh/responsibility/files/CSR-report/2021-CSR-report.c.pdf 遠傳電信股份有限公司(2022)。2021遠傳電信企業永續報告書。上網日期:2023年5月23日。檢自:https://corporate.fetnet.net/content/dam/fetnet/user_resource/corp/documents/csr/reportdownload/2021%E9%81%A0%E5%82%B3%E9%9B%BB%E4%BF%A1%E4%BC%81%E6%A5%AD%E6%B0%B8%E7%BA%8C%E5%A0%B1%E5%91%8A%E6%9B%B8.pdf 新光三越百貨股份有限公司(2022)。新光三越永續報告書2021。上網日期:2023年5月23日。檢自:https://esg.skm.com.tw/uploads/files/shares/2021report/skm_2021-ESG.pdf 廖羚雅(2022)。從計畫行為理論探討消費者購買善因行銷商品之行為—受測者背景及公益團體熟悉度、知名度之干擾效果。碩士論文,中原大學企業管理學系,桃園市。 陳順宇(2005)。多變量分析。台北市:華泰文化事業股份有限公司。 陳順宇(2007)。結構方程式:AMOS 操作。 新北市:心理出版社。 黃芳銘(2015)。結構方程模式理論與應用。台北市:台灣五南圖書出版股份 有限公司。 Ajzen, I. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predictiing social behavior. Englewood Cliffs. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211. Bamberg, S., Hunecke, M., & Blöbaum, A. (2007). Social context, personal norms and the use of public transportation: Two field studies. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27(3), 190-203. Béal, M., & Sabadie, W. (2018). The impact of customer inclusion in firm governance on customers' commitment and voice behaviors. Journal of Business Research, 92, 1-8. Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497-505. Chen, Z., & Xie, G. (2022). ESG disclosure and financial performance: Moderating role of ESG investors. International Review of Financial Analysis, 83, 102291. Collins, C. J., & Clark, K. D. (2003). Strategic human resource practices, top management team social networks, and firm performance: The role of human resource practices in creating organizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Journal, 46(6), 740-751. Cordeiro, J. J., & Tewari, M. (2015). Firm characteristics, industry context, and investor reactions to environmental CSR: A stakeholder theory approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 130, 833-849. Dedunu, H. H., & Sedara, D. (2023). Impact of Environmental, Social, and Governance Practices on the Consumer Buying Decision. In Intellectual Capital as a Precursor to Sustainable Corporate Social Responsibility (pp. 129-147). IGI Global. Folger-Laronde, Z., Pashang, S., Feor, L., & ElAlfy, A. (2022). ESG ratings and financial performance of exchange-traded funds during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 12(2), 490-496. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. In: Sage Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA. Han, H. (2015). Travelers' pro-environmental behavior in a green lodging context: Converging value-belief-norm theory and the theory of planned behavior. Tourism Management, 47, 164-177. Han, H., Chua, B. L., Ariza‐Montes, A., & Untaru, E. N. (2020). Effect of environmental corporate social responsibility on green attitude and norm activation process for sustainable consumption: Airline versus restaurant. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(4), 1851-1864. Han, H., Hsu, L.-T. J., & Sheu, C. (2010). Application of the theory of planned behavior to green hotel choice: Testing the effect of environmental friendly activities. Tourism Management, 31(3), 325-334. Hemphill, T. (2013). The ISO 26000 guidance on social responsibility international standard: what are the business governance implications? Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 13(3), 305-317. Jones III, R. J., Reilly, T. M., Cox, M. Z., & Cole, B. M. (2017). Gender makes a difference: Investigating consumer purchasing behavior and attitudes toward corporate social responsibility policies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 24(2), 133-144. Joo, K., Lee, J., & Hwang, J. (2022). NAM and TPB Approach to Consumers’ Decision-Making Framework in the Context of Indoor Smart Farm Restaurants. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(21), 14604. Kaiser, F. G., & Wilson, M. (2004). Goal-directed conservation behavior: The specific composition of a general performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 36(7), 1531-1544. Kaur, J., & Bhardwaj, N. (2021). Their control will make or break the sustainable clothing deal-a study of the moderating impact of actual behavioural control on the purchase intention-behaviour gap for sustainable clothing in india. Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal, 15(5), 59. Kim, H. M., Lee, I.-H., Joo, K., Lee, J., & Hwang, J. (2022). Psychological benefits of purchasing home meal replacement in the context of eco-friendly tv home shopping broadcast: The moderating role of personal norm. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(13), 7759. Kim, Y. (2023). A Study of the Integrated Model with Norm Activation Model and Theory of Planned Behavior: Applying the Green Hotel’s Corporate Social Responsibilities. Sustainability, 15(5), 4680. Koh, H.-K., Burnasheva, R., & Suh, Y. G. (2022). Perceived ESG (environmental, social, governance) and consumers’ responses: The mediating role of brand credibility, Brand Image, and perceived quality. Sustainability, 14(8), 4515. Landi, G., & Sciarelli, M. (2018). Towards a more ethical market: the impact of ESG rating on corporate financial performance. Social Responsibility Journal, 15(1), 11-27. Lee, K.-H., & Shin, D. (2010). Consumers’ responses to CSR activities: The linkage between increased awareness and purchase intention. Public Relations Review, 36(2), 193-195. Le, M. H., & Nguyen, P. M. (2022). Integrating the theory of planned behavior and the norm activation model to investigate organic food purchase intention: evidence from Vietnam. Sustainability, 14(2), 816. Liu, M. T., Liu, Y., & Mo, Z. (2020). Moral norm is the key: An extension of the theory of planned behaviour (TPB) on Chinese consumers' green purchase intention. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 32(8), 1823-1841. Liu, Q., Xu, N., Jiang, H., Wang, S., Wang, W., & Wang, J. (2020). Psychological driving mechanism of safety citizenship behaviors of construction workers: Application of the theory of planned behavior and norm activation model. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 146(4), 04020027. MacKinnon, J. G. (2009). Bootstrap Hypothesis Testing. Handbook of Computational Econometrics, 183-213. Miralles-Quirós, M. M., Miralles-Quirós, J. L., & Valente Gonçalves, L. M. (2018). The value relevance of environmental, social, and governance performance: The Brazilian case. Sustainability, 10(3), 574. Munerah, S., Koay, K. Y., & Thambiah, S. (2021). Factors influencing non-green consumers’ purchase intention: A partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 280, 124192. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory: 2d Ed. McGraw-Hill. Park, J., & Ha, S. (2014). Understanding consumer recycling behavior: Combining the theory of planned behavior and the norm activation model. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 42(3), 278-291. Pierce, J. L., O'driscoll, M. P., & Coghlan, A.-M. (2004). Work environment structure and psychological ownership: The mediating effects of control. The Journal of Social Psychology, 144(5), 507-534. Ramírez-Correa, P., Rondán-Cataluña, F. J., Moulaz, M. T., & Arenas-Gaitán, J. (2020). Purchase intention of specialty coffee. Sustainability, 12(4), 1329. Raworth, K., & Drique, M. (2017). A safe and just space for humanity. Revue Projet, 356(1), 10-14. Schwartz, S. H. (1977). Normative influences on altruism. In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 10, pp. 221-279). Elsevier. Shin, Y. H., Im, J., Jung, S. E., & Severt, K. (2018). The theory of planned behavior and the norm activation model approach to consumer behavior regarding organic menus. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 69, 21-29. Steg, L., & De Groot, J. (2010). Explaining prosocial intentions: Testing causal relationships in the norm activation model. British Journal of Social Psychology, 49(4), 725-743. Su, X., Sun, B., & Liu, Y. (2021). Selection of cost-effective investment and output subsidies for eco-friendly products. Journal of Cleaner Production, 286, 124985. Talesh, S. (2015). Rule‐Intermediaries in Action: How State and Business Stakeholders Influence the Meaning of Consumer Rights in Regulatory Governance Arrangements. Law & Policy, 37(1-2), 1-31. Twinamatsiko, E., & Kumar, D. (2022). Incorporating ESG in decision making for responsible and sustainable investments using machine learning. 2022 International Conference on Electronics and Renewable Systems (ICEARS), Van Liere, K. D., & Dunlap, R. E. (1978). Moral Norms and Environmental Behavior: An Application of Schwartz's Norm‐Activation Model to Yard Burning 1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 8(2), 174-188. Van Quaquebeke, N., Becker, J. U., Goretzki, N., & Barrot, C. (2019). Perceived ethical leadership affects customer purchasing intentions beyond ethical marketing in advertising due to moral identity self-congruence concerns. Journal of Business Ethics, 156, 357-376. Varadarajan, P. R., & Menon, A. (1988). Cause-related marketing: A coalignment of marketing strategy and corporate philanthropy. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 58-74. Vu, D. M., Ha, N. T., Ngo, T. V. N., Pham, H. T., & Duong, C. D. (2022). Environmental corporate social responsibility initiatives and green purchase intention: an application of the extended theory of planned behavior. Social Responsibility Journal, 18(8), 1627-1645. Whelan, T., Atz, U., Van Holt, T., & Clark, C. (2021). ESG and financial performance. Uncovering the Relationship by Aggregating Evidence from, 1, 2015-2020. Whitelock, V. G. (2015). Environmental social governance management: A theoretical perspective for the role of disclosure in the supply chain. International Journal of Business Information Systems 6, 18(4), 390-405. Wong, K. K.-K. (2013). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) techniques using SmartPLS. Marketing Bulletin, 24(1), 1-32. Wu, J.-H., Wu, C.-W., Lee, C.-T., & Lee, H.-J. (2015). Green purchase intentions: An exploratory study of the Taiwanese electric motorcycle market. Journal of Business Research, 68(4), 829-833. Yadav, R., & Pathak, G. S. (2017). Determinants of consumers' green purchase behavior in a developing nation: Applying and extending the theory of planned behavior. Ecological Economics, 134, 114-122. Yoon, B., Lee, J. H., & Byun, R. (2018). Does ESG performance enhance firm value? Evidence from Korea. Sustainability, 10(10), 3635. Yoo, S., & Managi, S. (2022). Disclosure or action: Evaluating ESG behavior towards financial performance. Finance Research Letters, 44, 102108. Zhang, F., & Zhang, R. (2018). Trade-in remanufacturing, customer purchasing behavior, and government policy. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 20(4), 601-616. Zhou, G., Liu, L., & Luo, S. (2022). Sustainable development, ESG performance and company market value: Mediating effect of financial performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(7), 3371-3387. | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/90106 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 全球的永續議題已經發展近30年,由一開始的環保議題為主的基本主軸,逐漸擴展至涵蓋社會公平正義與組織治理方式等三大面向。面對全球關注的ESG(環境Environmental,社會Social,治理Governance)議題,企業的ESG作為會直接地影響我們的未來與生活中一切資源的存續。近年來的許多研究關注在企業的ESG揭露資訊、實踐的作為是如何影響其公司的財務表現以及探討企業ESG資訊是如何影響投資人注入資金進行投資,然而,卻鮮少有研究由一般消費者的角度,討論企業的ESG作為會如何影響消費者的購買意圖及其消費行為。本研究根據Ajzen (1991)所提出的計畫行為理論(The Theory of Planned Behavior, TPB)結合Schwartz (1977)的規範激起模型(The Norm Activation Model, NAM)來檢視企業ESG作為對於消費者購買意圖及行為之影響。透過由台灣企業的永續報告書所盤點出的消費者關注之ESG作為,本研究應用偏最小平方法結構方程模型(Partial Least-squares Structural equation model, PLS-SEM),分別由環境面作為、社會面作為、治理面作為,檢示ESG作為及TPB理論、NAM模型中的心理構面因子與購買意圖之間的關係。
在一份由365人完成的線上問卷調查中,本研究發現台灣消費者在環境面作為中只對TPB理論中的態度(Attitude, AT)、主觀規範(Subjective Norms, SN)、知覺行為控制(Perceived Behavioral Control, PBC)心理構面產生正向影響,並進而影響購買意圖。社會面作為則對NAM模型中的後果意識(Awareness of Consequences, AC)、責任歸屬(Ascription of responsibility, AC)與個人規範(Personal Norm, PN)產生影響,並透過個人規範影響其購買意圖,同時也正向影響TPB理論中的知覺行為控制,並進一步影響購買意圖。在治理面作為部分,本研究則發現企業的治理對後果意識、態度、主觀規範、知覺行為控制皆有正向影響,且間接影響購買意圖。 根據本研究之實證結果,建議企業過往較少關注的治理面作為,必須給予更多的實質作為與實踐,因為其結果是會影響消費者的購買意圖的。本次調查也發現消費者對於企業的社會面作為,已不再滿足於公益或支持社區發展層面而已,更多關注在創新服務或客戶權益等作為。本文也發現,企業的ESG作為是會影響消費者的購買意圖的。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Global sustainability practices have been developing for nearly 30 years. From the initial focus on environmental protection practices, they have gradually expanded to cover three major aspects: social and justice practices, organizational governance practices. In the impacts of ESG (Environmental, Social, Governance) practices of global concern, the ESG actions of companies will directly affect the future resources of the planet and the existence all lives. In recent years, many studies have focused on how companies' ESG disclosure information and practices associated to their companies' financial performance, and explore how corporate ESG information affects investors' will of investment. However, there are few studies discussing how companies' ESG actions will affect consumers, and which ESG practices will have effects on consumers' purchase intentions. This study applies the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) proposed by Ajzen (1991), and combine it with the Norm Activation Model (NAM) by Schwartz (1977), to explain the general consumer’s intention towards ESG products consumption in this research. Highlight the ESG practices that consumers care about in the ESG reports of Taiwanese companies, listing environmental practices, social practices, and governance practices, then use the Partial Least-squares Structural equation model (PLS-SEM) methods to test the relationship between the above ESG practices and the psychological dimension factors of TPB theory and NAM model.
With a total of 365 responses in an online survey, the result from structural equation modeling indicated that while environmental practices are determinants of attitude, subjective norm, and perceived behavioral control, social practices are influential to awareness of consequences, ascription of responsibility and personal norms. As for the governance practices, they are found to affect behavioral intention through their effects on consequence awareness, attitude, subjective norms and perceived behavioral control. This study suggests that companies should pay more attention to governance practices that have been paid less attention in the past, because the results will affect consumers' purchase intentions. This study also found that consumers are no longer satisfied enterprise doing charity activities or supporting local community development on social practices behalf, and should pay more attention to practices such as innovative services or customer rights. This paper also finds that the corporate ESG practices will affect consumers' purchase intentions. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2023-09-22T17:26:25Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2023-09-22T17:26:25Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 目錄
謝辭 I 摘要 II ABSTRACT III 目錄 IV 表目錄 V 圖目錄 VI 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景 1 第二節 研究研究動機與目的 2 第二章 文獻回顧 3 第一節 企業的ESG理論與實踐 3 第二節 永續的消費行為模式 7 第三節 永續消費行為的研究方法 9 第三章 實證設計、資料概述與變數說明 10 第一節 研究架構 10 第二節 問卷設計 14 第三節 資料來源、變數定義及敘述統計 20 第四章 實證結果討論 23 第一節 信效度分析 23 第二節 路徑分析及研究假說驗證 26 第五章 結論與建議 34 參考文獻 37 表目錄 表3-1問卷題向內容發展來源與來源彙整表15 表3-2 問卷題項內容彙整表17 表3-3 變數定義、樣本之敘述統計21 表4-1 各構面信度分析表與因素負荷量23 表4-2 各構面之間相關係數區別效度分析表25 表4-3 路徑關係檢定表26 表4-4 中介效果檢定表32 圖目錄 圖3-1 以TPB理論結合NAM模型分析ESG產品購買意圖之架構圖10 圖4-1研究架構模型之路徑分析27 | - |
dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
dc.title | 企業ESG作為對於消費者購買意圖之影響 | zh_TW |
dc.title | The Effects of Corporate ESG Practices on Consumers’ Purchase Intention | en |
dc.type | Thesis | - |
dc.date.schoolyear | 111-2 | - |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 方珍玲;邱敬仁 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Chen-Ling Fang;Ching-Ren Chiu | en |
dc.subject.keyword | 環境,社會,治理,計畫行為理論,規範激起模型, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Environment,Social,Governance,Theory of Planned Behavior,Norm Activation Model, | en |
dc.relation.page | 43 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202303786 | - |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | - |
dc.date.accepted | 2023-08-12 | - |
dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | - |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 農業經濟學系 | - |
顯示於系所單位: | 農業經濟學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-111-2.pdf | 2.52 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。