請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/90094完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 劉好迪 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Adrian Rauchfleisch | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 黃逸薰 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Yi-Hsun Florence Huang | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-09-22T17:23:23Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2023-11-09 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2023-09-22 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2023 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2023-08-13 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Alperstein, N. (2021). Performing Media Activism in the Digital Age. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73804-4
Alvarez, S. E., Dagnino, E., & Escobar, A. (Eds.). (2018). Cultures of politics/politics of cultures: Re-visioning Latin American social movements. Routledge. Asen, R. (2000). Seeking the “Counter,” in Counterpublics. Communication Theory, 10(4), 424–446. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2000.tb00201.x Atton, C. (2002). Alternative Media. SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446220153 Atton, C. (2007). Current Issues in Alternative Media Research: Current Issues in Alternative Media Research. Sociology Compass, 1(1), 17–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9020.2007.00005.x Atton, C. (Ed.). (2015). The Routledge Companion to Alternative and Community Media (0 ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315717241 B. Hioe. (2020, March 23). Left Perspectives on Connecting Taiwan to the International World: How New Bloom Magazine was Founded. Taiwan Insight. https://taiwaninsight.org/2020/03/23/left-perspectives-on-connecting-taiwan-to-the-international-world-how-new-bloom-magazine-was-founded/ Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2013). The Logic of Connective Action: Digital Media and the Personalization of Contentious Politics (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139198752 Brouwer, D. C. (2006). Communication as Counterpublic. In G. Shepherd, J. St. John, & T. Striphas, Communication as…: Perspectives on Theory (pp. 195–208). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483329055 Buckingham, D. (Ed.). (2008). Youth, identity, and digital media. MIT Press. Cammaerts, B. (2015). Social Media and Activism. In P. H. Ang & R. Mansell (Eds.), The International Encyclopedia of Digital Communication and Society (1st ed., pp. 1–8). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118767771.wbiedcs083 Carlson, B., & Berglund, J. (Eds.). (2021). Indigenous peoples rise up: The global ascendency of social media activism. Rutgers University Press. Carroll, W. K., & Hackett, R. A. (2006). Democratic media activism through the lens of social movement theory. Media, Culture & Society, 28(1), 83–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443706059289 Cheng, E. W., Lui, E., & Fu, K. (2023). The power of digital activism for transnational advocacy: Leadership, engagement, and affordance. New Media & Society, 146144482311553. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448231155376 Cheng L. (2009). Alternative media practice (另類的媒體實踐). In Cheng L. & Luo X. (Eds.), Critical Media Literacy (批判的媒體識讀) (pp. 371–387). Cheng Chung Bookstore. Cushion, S., McDowell-Naylor, D., & Thomas, R. (2021). Why National Media Systems Matter: A Longitudinal Analysis of How UK Left-Wing and Right-Wing Alternative Media Critique Mainstream Media (2015–2018). Journalism Studies, 22(5), 633–652. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2021.1893795 Dowling, D. O. (2021). Alternative Media on the Front Lines: Unicorn Riot and Activist Journalism’s New Urgency. Journalism Practice, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2021.1987297 Downing, J. (2008). Social Movement Theories and Alternative Media: An Evaluation and Critique. Communication, Culture & Critique, 1(1), 40–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-9137.2007.00005.x Downey, J., & Fenton, N. (2003). New Media, Counter Publicity and the Public Sphere. New Media & Society, 5(2), 185–202. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444803005002003 Fraser, N. (1992). Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy. In C. Calhoun (Ed.), Habermas and the Public Sphere (Nachdr., pp. 109–142). MIT Press. Fullam, J. (2017). Becoming a youth activist in the internet age: A case study on social media activism and identity development. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 30(4), 406–422. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2016.1250176 Gerbaudo, P. (2015). Tweets and the Streets: Social Media and Contemporary Activism. Pluto Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt183pdzs Gerbaudo, P., & Treré, E. (2015). In search of the ‘we’ of social media activism: Introduction to the special issue on social media and protest identities. Information, Communication & Society, 18(8), 865–871. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1043319 Gleason, B. (2013). #Occupy Wall Street: Exploring Informal Learning About a Social Movement on Twitter. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(7), 966–982. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764213479372 Habermas, J. (1992). Further Reflections on the Public Sphere. In C. Calhoun (Ed.), Habermas and the Public Sphere (Nachdr., pp. 421–461). MIT Press. Habermas, J. (1999). The Structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society (10. print). MIT Press. Hioe, B. (2015, June 26). In Search of Lost Time. New Bloom Magazine. https://newbloommag.net/2015/06/26/in-search-of-lost-time/ Ho, M. (2015). Occupy Congress in Taiwan: Political Opportunity, Threat, and the Sunflower Movement. Journal of East Asian Studies, 15(1), 69–97. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1598240800004173 Holt, K., Ustad Figenschou, T., & Frischlich, L. (2019). Key Dimensions of Alternative News Media. Digital Journalism, 7(7), 860–869. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2019.1625715 Huang V. G. (2014). Transnational Information Politics: The Interaction between Local Contentions and International Media (跨國資訊政治：當地方性抗爭遭遇國際媒體). 傳播與社會學刊, 30. https://doi.org/10.30180/CS.201410_(30).0007 Kavanagh, M. M. (2020). Authoritarianism, outbreaks, and information politics. The Lancet Public Health, 5(3), e135–e136. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30030-X Keck, M. E., & Sikkink, K. (1998). Activists beyond borders: Advocacy networks in international politics. Cornell University Press. Kellner, D. (2003). Media Culture: Cultural Studies, Identity and Politics between the Modern and the Post-modern (0 ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203205808 Kuang C.-S. (2011). A Voice for Minorities and Anti-Stigma: Alternative “Media” and Cultural Action in Taiwan (弱勢發聲、告別污名：台灣另類「媒體」與文化行動). 傳播研究與實踐, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.6123/JCRP.2011.010 Kuo L. (2010). Alternative Media and Voices on Orchid Island: A Case Study of Opposition Movements to Nuclear Waste Storage and National Parks (蘭嶼的另類媒體與發聲：以核廢料與國家公園反對運動為例). 中華傳播學刊, 無(17). https://doi.org/10.6195/cjcr.2010.17.03 Lee C. H. (2015). Resources Mobilization and Internationalization Strategies in Social Movement： A Case Study of “Sunflower Movement” (社會運動中國際宣傳的資源動員與策略：以「太陽花學運」為例). 國立台灣大學學位論文. Lee, F. L. F. (2018). Internet alternative media, movement experience, and radicalism: The case of post-Umbrella Movement Hong Kong. Social Movement Studies, 17(2), 219–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2017.1404448 Lien, A. N. (2022). A battle for truth: Islam-related counterpublic discourse on Scandinavian news media Facebook pages. New Media & Society, 146144482110684. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211068436 Lievrouw, L. A. (2011). Alternative and activist new media. Polity. Lu Y. S. (2016). The Journalistic Practices of Alternative Media in Taiwan: The Analysis of News & Market (以變為常，台灣另類╱獨立媒體的新聞實踐—以《上下游新聞市集》為例). 國立政治大學. Meikle, G. (2002). Future active: Media activism and the Internet. Routledge [u.a.]. Nachman, L., Rauchfleisch, A., & Hioe, B. (2022). How China Divides the Left: Competing Transnational Left-Wing Alternative Media on Twitter. Media and Communication, 10(3), 50–63. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v10i3.5345 Negt, O., & Kluge, A. (1993). Public sphere and experience: Toward an analysis of the bourgeois and proletarian public sphere. University of Minnesota Press. New Bloom. (2014). About New Bloom / 關於破土. New Bloom Magazine. https://newbloommag.net/about/ Nip, J. Y. M., & Cheng, Y.-C. (2022). Assessing the Impact of Digital Alternative News Media in a Hybrid News Environment: Cases from Taiwan and Hong Kong. Journalism and Media, 3(3), 568–593. https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia3030039 Page, R. E. (2013). Stories and social media: Identities and interaction (1. issued in paperback). Routledge. Park, C. S. (2013). Does Twitter motivate involvement in politics? Tweeting, opinion leadership, and political engagement. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4), 1641–1648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.01.044 Parmelee, J. H., & Bichard, S. L. (2012). Politics and the Twitter revolution: How tweets influence the relationship between political leaders and the public. Lexington Books. Pickard, V. W., & Yang, G. (Eds.). (2017). Media activism in the digital age. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. Rauch, J. (2007). Activists as interpretive communities: Rituals of consumption and interaction in an alternative media audience. Media, Culture & Society, 29(6), 994–1013. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443707084345 Rauch, J. (2016). Are There Still Alternatives? Relationships Between Alternative Media and Mainstream Media in a Converged Environment: Reconceiving Alternative and Mainstream Media. Sociology Compass, 10(9), 756–767. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12403 Robé, C., & Wolfson, T. (2020). Reflections on the inheritances of Indymedia in the age of surveillance and social media. Media, Culture & Society, 42(6), 1024–1030. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443720926056 Rogstad, I. (2016). Is Twitter just rehashing? Intermedia agenda setting between Twitter and mainstream media. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 13(2), 142–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2016.1160263 Ron, J., Ramos, H., & Rodgers, K. (2005). Transnational Information Politics: NGO Human Rights Reporting, 1986-2000. International Studies Quarterly, 49(3), 557–588. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2005.00377.x Rowen, I. (2015). Inside Taiwan’s Sunflower Movement: Twenty-Four Days in a Student-Occupied Parliament, and the Future of the Region. The Journal of Asian Studies, 74(1), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021911814002174 Seargeant, P., & Tagg, C. (Eds.). (2014). The language of social media: Identity and community on the Internet. Palgrave Macmillan. Tarrow, S. (2001). Transnational Politics: Contention and Institutions in International Politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 4(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.4.1.1 Thörn, H. (2007). Social Movements, the Media and the Emergence of a Global Public Sphere: From Anti-Apartheid to Global Justice. Current Sociology, 55(6), 896–918. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392107081992 Tilly, C. (2004). Social Movements, 1768–2004 (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315632063 Toepfl, F., & Piwoni, E. (2015). Public Spheres in Interaction: Comment Sections of News Websites as Counterpublic Spaces: Public Spheres in Interaction. Journal of Communication, 65(3), 465–488. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12156 Toepfl, F., & Piwoni, E. (2018). Targeting dominant publics: How counterpublic commenters align their efforts with mainstream news. New Media & Society, 20(5), 2011–2027. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817712085 Treré, E., & Kaun, A. (2021). Digital Media Activism: A Situated, Historical, and Ecological Approach Beyond the Technological Sublime. In G. Balbi, N. Ribeiro, V. Schafer, & C. Schwarzenegger (Eds.), Digital Roots (pp. 193–208). De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110740202-011 Van Leeckwyck, R. (2019). The printed (French-speaking) alternative media in Belgium: Journalism or activism? Journal of Alternative & Community Media, 4(2), 44–59. https://doi.org/10.1386/joacm_00048_1 Velasquez, A., & LaRose, R. (2015). Social Media for Social Change: Social Media Political Efficacy and Activism in Student Activist Groups. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 59(3), 456–474. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2015.1054998 Warner, M. (2002). Publics and Counterpublics. Public Culture, 14(1), 49–90. https://doi.org/10.1215/08992363-14-1-49 Williams D. (2010). News discourse of the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA) in Taiwan’s three English newspapers (針對在台灣的三家英文報對於兩岸經濟合作架構協議的新聞評論) [碩士論文, 國立政治大學]. https://www.airitilibrary.com/Publication/alDetailedMesh1?DocID=U0004-1511201110225253 Yen S.-C. (2012). An Analysis of Framing Controversial News: A Comparative Study of the News of U.S. Beef Import in The China Post, The Taipei Times and The Taiwan News (臺灣英文報紙的新聞框架分析—以開放美國牛肉進口爭議新聞為例). 國立台灣大學學位論文. Yilmaz, S. R. (2017). The role of social media activism in new social movements: Opportunities and limitations. | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/90094 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本論文旨在探討於 2014 年成立的左翼另類媒體《破土》（New Bloom），其成立受美國佔領華爾街運動啟發，主要活躍於台灣，並以英文為主要發表語言。該媒體的核心目標在於提供「對台灣及亞太地區議題的激進觀點」，同時力求構建跨國性的左翼政治和智識交流對話。因此，本研究聚焦於三個核心研究問題：（一）《破土》自成立以來所刊載與傳播的內容為何？（二）其在社交媒體平台Twitter上所形成的社群特徵為何？是否具有跨國性？（三）該媒體在不同層面上所帶來的影響為何？
本研究以混合研究方法回應上述研究問題。在量化方面，利用 R 程式語言進行網路爬蟲，擷取《破土》網站自成立以來的所有文章（共 3,059 篇），並運用自動化文本分析模型STM（Structural Topic Modeling）解析文章主題，從而回答首個研究問題：該媒體過去發佈了哪些主題，並呈現了何種內容？隨後，針對第二個研究問題，本研究蒐集了《破土》在 Twitter上的全部追蹤者（共10,657 位）的相關資訊，以及該媒體所發布的所有推文（共6,317 則）及轉發推文（共 46,141則）。透過 OpenStreetMap，分析了《破土》追蹤者的地理分佈情形；並進一步運用社會網絡分析工具 Gephi，視覺化呈現追蹤者之間的社會網絡關係，並對其進行深入分析。最終，本文運用質性方法對《破土》成員進行訪談，以解答第三個研究問題。 研究結果顯示，《破土》關注的主題涵蓋台灣內政、COVID-19、香港政治、台灣社會議題以及跨國議題等。該媒體確實形成以美國、台灣和香港知識份子及離散社群（Diaspora）為主體的社群網絡。此研究不僅彌補了過去對台灣英語媒體研究的缺口，更以全新的研究取徑探究台灣獨立媒體，並成為首篇探討台灣獨立媒體跨國面向的學術論文。透過新聞報導與經營位於台北的實體場所「Daybreak Cafe」，《破土》不僅實踐另類媒體的批判角色，更促成認同塑造和跨國行動者網絡的社群建構。藉由反覆地言說和行動，我們得以不斷重新界定「台灣」。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | This study aims to comprehensively investigate New Bloom, a left-wing alternative media platform founded in 2014, inspired by the U.S. Occupy Wall Street movement. Operating primarily in Taiwan and utilizing English as its principal publication language, New Bloom is dedicated to offering "radical perspectives on Taiwan and the Asia Pacific" and endeavoring to foster cross-national dialogues in left-wing politics and intellectual discourse. Accordingly, this research centers on three primary inquiries: (1) What types of content has New Bloom produced and disseminated since its inception? (2) What distinct characteristics define the community it has cultivated on the social media platform Twitter, and does this community exhibit transnational attributes? (3) What multifaceted impacts has this media outlet generated across varying levels?
To address these research queries, a mixed-methods approach is employed. On the quantitative front, the R programming language is employed to conduct web scraping, amassing all articles (N = 3,059) published by New Bloom since its establishment. Subsequently, the Structural Topic Modeling (STM) method, a semi-automated text analysis model, is applied to decode prevalent themes and contents, thus providing insights into the first research question. Consecutively, in response to the second research query, this study aggregates comprehensive data about all Twitter followers (N = 10,657) of New Bloom, as well as all tweets (N = 6,317) posted by the platform and retweets (N = 46,141) of its content. Leveraging OpenStreetMap, geographical distribution among New Bloom's followers is analyzed. Furthermore, the Gephi software is harnessed for social network analysis, offering both visualization and in-depth analysis of the intricate social network relationships among New Bloom's followers. Ultimately, qualitative interviews are conducted with New Bloom members to provide insight into the third research question. The research findings underscore New Bloom's engagement with a spectrum of themes, including Taiwan's domestic politics, COVID-19, Hong Kong's political landscape, Taiwanese societal concerns, and transnational subjects. Significantly, the platform effectively forges a community primarily composed of intellectuals and diasporic groups from the United States, Taiwan, and Hong Kong. This research endeavors to address a gap in the study of English-language media within Taiwan, adopting innovative methodologies to investigate Taiwan's independent media scene. This study is notable as the first to explore the transnational dimension of Taiwan's independent media. Through news dissemination and the operation of Daybreak Cafe, a physical space in Taipei, New Bloom fulfills not only a critical role in alternative media but also shapes identity and nurtures cross-national activist networks within its community. Through iterative discourse and action, the very notion of "Taiwan" is continually redefined/ relocated. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2023-09-22T17:23:23Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2023-09-22T17:23:23Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 摘要 i
Abstract iii 目錄 Index v 圖目錄 Figure Index viii 表目錄 Table Index ix I. Introduction 1 1-1. Alternative Media in the Age of the Internet in Taiwan 1 1-2. The birth of New Bloom 4 II. Literature Review 6 2-1. Media and Activism 6 2-1-1. Media, public sphere and Counterpublic 6 2-1-2. Media and Social Movement 7 2-2. Media and Identity 8 2-3. Media and Transnational Information Politics 10 2-3-1. Alternative Media 11 2-3-2. Alternative Media in Taiwan 12 III. Research Questions & Methods 14 3-1. Conceptual Framework 14 3-2. Research Questions 16 3-3. Data and methods 19 IV. Research Results 22 4-1. New Bloom Content & Communication Frame Analysis 22 4-1-1. Taiwan Domestic Politics 27 4-1-2. COVID-19 and Variants 28 4-1-3. Hong Kong Politics 29 4-1-4. Social Issues in Taiwan 29 4-1-5. Transnational Issues and Others 30 4-1-6. Number of articles published by New Bloom each month 31 4-2. Audience Location & Following Network Analysis 39 4-3. The Impacts of New Bloom on Different Levels 48 V. Discussion 51 5-1. The role of New Bloom in the media environment of Taiwan 51 5-1-1. The International Media outlets in Taiwan versus New Bloom 52 5-1-2. The English Media in Taiwan versus New Bloom 54 5-1-3. The Mandarin Alternative Media in Taiwan versus New Bloom 55 5-2. The purpose of New Bloom over the scale of time 57 Reference 60 Appendix 68 Pre-Interview Statement: Ensuring Confidentiality and Privacy Protection 68 Research Interview Questions 71 | - |
| dc.language.iso | en | - |
| dc.subject | 另類媒體 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 文本分析 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 跨國社群 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 社會網絡分析 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 社群媒體分析 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Transnational community | en |
| dc.subject | Content analysis | en |
| dc.subject | Social network analysis | en |
| dc.subject | Alternative media | en |
| dc.subject | Social media analysis | en |
| dc.title | 「重新界定臺灣」——左翼另類媒體《破土》的社會網絡與實踐 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | “Relocating Taiwan”: Exploring New Bloom's Impact as an Alternative Media Platform in the Digital Age | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 111-2 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 謝吉隆;許詩嫺 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Ji-Lung Hsieh;Shih Hsien Hsu | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 另類媒體,跨國社群,文本分析,社會網絡分析,社群媒體分析, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Alternative media,Transnational community,Content analysis,Social network analysis,Social media analysis, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 76 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202303940 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2023-08-14 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 新聞研究所 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 新聞研究所 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-111-2.pdf | 1.35 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。