請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/90029完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 陳冠銘 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Kuan-Ming Chen | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 劉憲銘 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Hsien-Ming Liu | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-09-22T17:07:19Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2023-11-09 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2023-09-22 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2023 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2023-08-10 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Fried, L. P. et al. (Mar. 2001). “Frailty in Older Adults: Evidence for a Phenotype”. In: The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences 56 (3), pp. M146–M157. ISSN: 1079-5006. DOI: 10.1093/gerona/56.3.M146. URL: https://academic.oup.com/biomedgerontology/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/gerona/56.3.M146.
Hosseini, Roozbeh, Karen A. Kopecky, and Kai Zhao (July 2022). “The evolution of health over the life cycle”. In: Review of Economic Dynamics 45, pp. 237–263. ISSN: 10942025. DOI: 10.1016/j.red.2021.07.001. Kim, Dae Hyun et al. (June 2018). “Measuring Frailty in Medicare Data: Development and Validation of a Claims-Based Frailty Index”. In: Journals of Gerontology - Series A Biological Science 73 (7), pp. 980–987. ISSN: 1758535X. DOI: 10.1093/gerona/glx229. Peña, Fernando G et al. (Dec. 2014). “Comparison of alternate scoring of variables on the performance of the frailty index”. In: BMC Geriatrics 14 (1), p. 25. ISSN: 1471-2318. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2318-14-25. URL: https://bmcgeriatr.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2318-14-25. Rockwood, Kenneth et al. (Aug. 2005). “A global clinical measure of fitness and frailty in elderly people”. In: CMAJ. Canadian Medical Association Journal 173 (5), pp. 489– 495. ISSN: 14882329. DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.050051. | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/90029 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 衰弱在老年醫學和醫療保健研究中是一個常見問題。本研究引入了一種新的方法,可應用於12歲以上的人群進而評估其健康狀況。這一方法旨在在準確性、可解釋性和運算效率之間取得平衡,從而建構出預測衰弱指數。我們主要利用全民健康保險資料和四種機器學習演算法建立預測模型。首先,我們使用2009年國民健康訪問調查(NHIS)的數據,建立了基於自我回答的衰弱指數(SFI)。接著,我們使用同一年份的全民健康保險資料庫(NHIRD)以機器學習方法建立基於看診記錄的衰弱指數(CFI),這包括使用國際疾病分類(ICD)代碼以及醫療花費點數。最後,我們選擇了一個相對精確的模型,用於預測衰弱指數,從而幫助評估個人的健康狀況並提供早期治療的相關建議。根據實證結果,與非自我回答的受訪者相比,自我回答的受訪者其預測結果可顯著提高預測準確度,最大R2約為0.52,而平均絕對誤差約為0.03,衰弱指數在0到0.2之間時,預測能力更佳。在計算疾病時以二元法計算的模型比使用加總法的模型預測能力更好。當應用於預測死亡率時,若預測之衰弱指數高於0.2時,應考慮提早接受治療以延長生命。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Frailty is a common issue in geriatric medicine and healthcare research. This study introduces a novel method applicable to individuals aged 12 and above for assessing their health status. The aim is to balance accuracy, interpretability, and computational efficiency in constructing a predictive frailty index. The primary approach involves utilizing nationwide health insurance data and four machine learning algorithms to establish predictive models. A self-reported Frailty Index (SFI) is initially constructed based on the 2009 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) data. Subsequently, a claim-based Frailty Index (CFI) is built using the same year's National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) with medical records and International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes along with healthcare expenditure. Finally, we select a relatively accurate model to predict the frailty index, which helps evaluate individual health conditions and provides relevant suggestions for early intervention. According to empirical results, compared to non-self-reporting respondents, those who self-reported showed significantly improved predictive accuracy, with a maximum R2 of approximately 0.52 and a mean absolute error of around 0.03. The frailty index demonstrates better predictive capability when it ranges between 0 and 0.2. The model using the binary methodology for disease calculation outperformed the one using the summation method for predictive capability. When applied to predict mortality rates, early intervention should be considered if the predicted frailty index exceeds 0.2, aiming to prolong life. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2023-09-22T17:07:19Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2023-09-22T17:07:19Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | Verification Letter from the Oral Examination Committee i
摘要 iii Abstract v Contents vii List of Figures xi List of Tables xiii Chapter 1 Introduction 1 Chapter 2 Evaluating Health through the Frailty Index 7 2.1 Understanding Frailty - Beyond Conventional Wisdom 7 2.2 Health Assessment - Role of the Frailty Index 8 2.3 Assessment Models - Phenotype and Cumulative Deficit 9 Chapter 3 Data 11 3.1 Survey Data – National Health Interview Survey 12 3.2 Claimed Data – National Health Insurance Research Database 12 3.2.1 Ambulatory Care Expenditures By Visits (Health01) 13 3.2.2 Inpatient Expenditures by Admissions (Health02) 13 3.2.3 Registry for Beneficiaries (Health07) 14 3.3 Linking Between Survey and Claimed Data 14 3.4 Variable Selection and Index Construction 15 3.4.1 Self-Reported Frailty Index Variable Selection and Construction 15 3.4.2 Claim-based Frailty Index (CFI) Construction 16 3.4.3 ICD9CM Code and the Categories 17 3.4.4 Patient Type and Visiting Record Calculation 18 3.5 Descriptive Statistics 19 Chapter 4 Model Specification 25 4.1 Benchmark Setup 26 4.2 Prediction Data Preparation 27 4.3 Predictive Method – Import Machine Learning Approach 28 4.3.1 Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) 29 4.3.2 Partial Least Squared Regression (PLSR) 29 4.3.3 Random Forest Regression (RF) 30 4.3.4 Extreme Gradient Boosting Regression (XGBoost) 31 Chapter 5 Empirical Result - Based on NHIS Respondents 33 5.1 Claimed-based Frailty Index Summary 33 5.2 Prediction of Claim-based Frailty Index 36 Chapter 6 Application – Mortality 43 Chapter 7 Robustness Check 51 7.1 Inclusion of Missing Values 51 7.2 Modification of Survey Data Set 52 7.3 Incorporation Additional Records for CFI Prediction 52 7.4 Incorporation of Interaction Terms 52 Chapter 8 Conclusion 55 Bibliography 57 Appendix A — ICD9-CM 19 Major Categories with Ranges 59 A.1 ICD9-CM 19 Major Categories with Ranges 59 Appendix B — Selected Questions in Self-reported Frailty Index 61 B.1 Selected Questions in Self-reported Frailty Index 61 Appendix C — Box Plot for SFI by Age Cohort and Gender (wSelf) 63 C.1 Box Plot for SFI by Age Cohort and Gender (wSelf) 63 | - |
| dc.language.iso | en | - |
| dc.subject | 死亡率預測 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 衰弱指數預測 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 健保資料庫 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 國民健康訪問調查 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 機器學習 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) | en |
| dc.subject | Frailty Index Prediction | en |
| dc.subject | Machine Learning | en |
| dc.subject | Mortality Prediction | en |
| dc.subject | National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) | en |
| dc.title | 衰弱指數預測與其應用 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Frailty Index Prediction and Its Application | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 111-2 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.coadvisor | 林明仁 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.coadvisor | Ming-Jen Lin | en |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 陳由常;趙曉芳 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Yu-Chang Chen;Shiau-Fang Chao | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 衰弱指數預測,機器學習,死亡率預測,國民健康訪問調查,健保資料庫, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Frailty Index Prediction,Machine Learning,Mortality Prediction,National Health Interview Survey (NHIS),National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD), | en |
| dc.relation.page | 65 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202303173 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(限校園內公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2023-08-11 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 經濟學系 | - |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2028-08-06 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 經濟學系 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-111-2.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 1.41 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
