Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 社會科學院
  3. 經濟學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/90029
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor陳冠銘zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorKuan-Ming Chenen
dc.contributor.author劉憲銘zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorHsien-Ming Liuen
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-22T17:07:19Z-
dc.date.available2023-11-09-
dc.date.copyright2023-09-22-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.date.submitted2023-08-10-
dc.identifier.citationFried, L. P. et al. (Mar. 2001). “Frailty in Older Adults: Evidence for a Phenotype”. In: The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences 56 (3), pp. M146–M157. ISSN: 1079-5006. DOI: 10.1093/gerona/56.3.M146. URL: https://academic.oup.com/biomedgerontology/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/gerona/56.3.M146.

Hosseini, Roozbeh, Karen A. Kopecky, and Kai Zhao (July 2022). “The evolution of health over the life cycle”. In: Review of Economic Dynamics 45, pp. 237–263. ISSN: 10942025. DOI: 10.1016/j.red.2021.07.001.

Kim, Dae Hyun et al. (June 2018). “Measuring Frailty in Medicare Data: Development and Validation of a Claims-Based Frailty Index”. In: Journals of Gerontology - Series A Biological Science 73 (7), pp. 980–987. ISSN: 1758535X. DOI: 10.1093/gerona/glx229.

Peña, Fernando G et al. (Dec. 2014). “Comparison of alternate scoring of variables on the performance of the frailty index”. In: BMC Geriatrics 14 (1), p. 25. ISSN: 1471-2318. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2318-14-25. URL: https://bmcgeriatr.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2318-14-25.

Rockwood, Kenneth et al. (Aug. 2005). “A global clinical measure of fitness and frailty in elderly people”. In: CMAJ. Canadian Medical Association Journal 173 (5), pp. 489– 495. ISSN: 14882329. DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.050051.
-
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/90029-
dc.description.abstract衰弱在老年醫學和醫療保健研究中是一個常見問題。本研究引入了一種新的方法,可應用於12歲以上的人群進而評估其健康狀況。這一方法旨在在準確性、可解釋性和運算效率之間取得平衡,從而建構出預測衰弱指數。我們主要利用全民健康保險資料和四種機器學習演算法建立預測模型。首先,我們使用2009年國民健康訪問調查(NHIS)的數據,建立了基於自我回答的衰弱指數(SFI)。接著,我們使用同一年份的全民健康保險資料庫(NHIRD)以機器學習方法建立基於看診記錄的衰弱指數(CFI),這包括使用國際疾病分類(ICD)代碼以及醫療花費點數。最後,我們選擇了一個相對精確的模型,用於預測衰弱指數,從而幫助評估個人的健康狀況並提供早期治療的相關建議。根據實證結果,與非自我回答的受訪者相比,自我回答的受訪者其預測結果可顯著提高預測準確度,最大R2約為0.52,而平均絕對誤差約為0.03,衰弱指數在0到0.2之間時,預測能力更佳。在計算疾病時以二元法計算的模型比使用加總法的模型預測能力更好。當應用於預測死亡率時,若預測之衰弱指數高於0.2時,應考慮提早接受治療以延長生命。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractFrailty is a common issue in geriatric medicine and healthcare research. This study introduces a novel method applicable to individuals aged 12 and above for assessing their health status. The aim is to balance accuracy, interpretability, and computational efficiency in constructing a predictive frailty index. The primary approach involves utilizing nationwide health insurance data and four machine learning algorithms to establish predictive models. A self-reported Frailty Index (SFI) is initially constructed based on the 2009 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) data. Subsequently, a claim-based Frailty Index (CFI) is built using the same year's National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) with medical records and International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes along with healthcare expenditure. Finally, we select a relatively accurate model to predict the frailty index, which helps evaluate individual health conditions and provides relevant suggestions for early intervention. According to empirical results, compared to non-self-reporting respondents, those who self-reported showed significantly improved predictive accuracy, with a maximum R2 of approximately 0.52 and a mean absolute error of around 0.03. The frailty index demonstrates better predictive capability when it ranges between 0 and 0.2. The model using the binary methodology for disease calculation outperformed the one using the summation method for predictive capability. When applied to predict mortality rates, early intervention should be considered if the predicted frailty index exceeds 0.2, aiming to prolong life.en
dc.description.provenanceSubmitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2023-09-22T17:07:19Z
No. of bitstreams: 0
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2023-09-22T17:07:19Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0en
dc.description.tableofcontentsVerification Letter from the Oral Examination Committee i
摘要 iii
Abstract v
Contents vii
List of Figures xi
List of Tables xiii
Chapter 1 Introduction 1
Chapter 2 Evaluating Health through the Frailty Index 7
2.1 Understanding Frailty - Beyond Conventional Wisdom 7
2.2 Health Assessment - Role of the Frailty Index 8
2.3 Assessment Models - Phenotype and Cumulative Deficit 9
Chapter 3 Data 11
3.1 Survey Data – National Health Interview Survey 12
3.2 Claimed Data – National Health Insurance Research Database 12
3.2.1 Ambulatory Care Expenditures By Visits (Health01) 13
3.2.2 Inpatient Expenditures by Admissions (Health02) 13
3.2.3 Registry for Beneficiaries (Health07) 14
3.3 Linking Between Survey and Claimed Data 14
3.4 Variable Selection and Index Construction 15
3.4.1 Self-Reported Frailty Index Variable Selection and Construction 15
3.4.2 Claim-based Frailty Index (CFI) Construction 16
3.4.3 ICD9CM Code and the Categories 17
3.4.4 Patient Type and Visiting Record Calculation 18
3.5 Descriptive Statistics 19
Chapter 4 Model Specification 25
4.1 Benchmark Setup 26
4.2 Prediction Data Preparation 27
4.3 Predictive Method – Import Machine Learning Approach 28
4.3.1 Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) 29
4.3.2 Partial Least Squared Regression (PLSR) 29
4.3.3 Random Forest Regression (RF) 30
4.3.4 Extreme Gradient Boosting Regression (XGBoost) 31
Chapter 5 Empirical Result - Based on NHIS Respondents 33
5.1 Claimed-based Frailty Index Summary 33
5.2 Prediction of Claim-based Frailty Index 36
Chapter 6 Application – Mortality 43
Chapter 7 Robustness Check 51
7.1 Inclusion of Missing Values 51
7.2 Modification of Survey Data Set 52
7.3 Incorporation Additional Records for CFI Prediction 52
7.4 Incorporation of Interaction Terms 52
Chapter 8 Conclusion 55
Bibliography 57
Appendix A — ICD9-CM 19 Major Categories with Ranges 59
A.1 ICD9-CM 19 Major Categories with Ranges 59
Appendix B — Selected Questions in Self-reported Frailty Index 61
B.1 Selected Questions in Self-reported Frailty Index 61
Appendix C — Box Plot for SFI by Age Cohort and Gender (wSelf) 63
C.1 Box Plot for SFI by Age Cohort and Gender (wSelf) 63
-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.subject死亡率預測zh_TW
dc.subject衰弱指數預測zh_TW
dc.subject健保資料庫zh_TW
dc.subject國民健康訪問調查zh_TW
dc.subject機器學習zh_TW
dc.subjectNational Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD)en
dc.subjectFrailty Index Predictionen
dc.subjectMachine Learningen
dc.subjectMortality Predictionen
dc.subjectNational Health Interview Survey (NHIS)en
dc.title衰弱指數預測與其應用zh_TW
dc.titleFrailty Index Prediction and Its Applicationen
dc.typeThesis-
dc.date.schoolyear111-2-
dc.description.degree碩士-
dc.contributor.coadvisor林明仁zh_TW
dc.contributor.coadvisorMing-Jen Linen
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee陳由常;趙曉芳zh_TW
dc.contributor.oralexamcommitteeYu-Chang Chen;Shiau-Fang Chaoen
dc.subject.keyword衰弱指數預測,機器學習,死亡率預測,國民健康訪問調查,健保資料庫,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordFrailty Index Prediction,Machine Learning,Mortality Prediction,National Health Interview Survey (NHIS),National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD),en
dc.relation.page65-
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU202303173-
dc.rights.note同意授權(限校園內公開)-
dc.date.accepted2023-08-11-
dc.contributor.author-college社會科學院-
dc.contributor.author-dept經濟學系-
dc.date.embargo-lift2028-08-06-
顯示於系所單位:經濟學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-111-2.pdf
  未授權公開取用
1.41 MBAdobe PDF檢視/開啟
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved