請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/89996
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 洪美仁 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.advisor | Mei-Jen Hung | en |
dc.contributor.author | 葉南希 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author | Nan-Hsi Yeh | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-09-22T16:59:18Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-11-09 | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2023-09-22 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2023 | - |
dc.date.submitted | 2023-08-09 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | 壹、中文部分
王為國、張奕華、許正妹、黃世奇、劉世閔、羅國俊,2006,《質性研究資料分析與文獻格式之運用:以QSR N6與EndNote 8為例》,台北:心理。 王國武,2019,《政府採購法之實務》,台北市:新學林。 古盛榮,2007,《採購知識管理系統建置之探討》,華梵大學資訊管理學系碩士班碩士論文。 行政院公共工程委員會,1999,民國88年4月2日工程企字第8804490號函。 行政院公共工程委員會,2022,民國111年12月23日工程企字第1110100798號函。 行政院公共工程委員會(無日期),政府採購資訊-97年度至111年度政府採購業務推動情形及執行績效。2023年7月1日,取自:https://www.pcc.gov.tw/Content_List.aspx?n=67C945450B216D6C。 行政院公共工程委員會,2020,《政府採購法令彙編》,台北市:行政院公共工程委員會。 行政院公共工程委員會(無日期),採購專業人員訓練教材。2023年6月27日,取自:https://www.pcc.gov.tw/cp.aspx?n=4F4ECFCE601D57F6。 行政院研究發展考核委員會,2004,〈知識管理在政府機關之應用以行政機關政策形成機制建立為例〉,台北:行政院研究發展考核委員會編印(委託研究單位:中國生產力中心)。 林東清,2010,《知識管理》,台北:智勝文化。 李建龍,2022,《業務與幕僚部門衝突之研究 以臺北市政府勞務採購為例》,國立政治大學行政管理碩士學程碩士論文。 李國瑋、李志強、袁本麗,2012,〈企業知識內化之探討-整合學習循環理論與知識學習觀點〉,《管理科學研究》Vol.9 No.1:19-48。 李國瑋、李家瑩、陳欣琪,2014,〈知識外化與內化過程中知識流失現象與知識流失成因之探討〉,《電子商務學報》第十六卷第二期:199-246。 郭昱瑩、洪綾君,2012,〈行政及政策類委託研究計畫適用政府採購法問題之探討:代理人理論觀點〉,《競爭力評論》,第15期:7-40。 陳飛帆、王世景,2021,〈初探採購契約與激勵要素之合併運用效果〉,《陸軍後勤季刊》:68-86頁。 胡瑋珊譯,1999,《知識管理-織如何有效運用知識》,臺中市:中國生產力中心。(Davenport, Thomas H. & Laurence Prusak,1998) 高秋玉,2019,〈知識管理對政府採購人員專業化影響之研究:以新北市政府工務局為例〉,國立臺北大學公共行政暨政策學系碩士在職專班碩士論文。 陳柏村,2006,《知識管理-正確概念與企業實務》,台北:五南。 陳敦源,2014,〈邁向循證基礎的政府人力資源管理:以主客觀資料整合建立「臺灣文官調查資料庫」的經驗分享〉,《人事月刊》:11-28。 黃朝盟,2005,〈政府組織的知識管理現狀與挑戰〉,《政治科學論叢》:137-168。 隋德蘭,2001,〈公務組織知識管理與績效關係之研究—以高雄市政府採購部門對政府採購法知識管理為例〉,義守大學管理科學研究所碩士論文。 楊政學,2006,《知識管理學理與實證》,台北:揚智文化。 楊黎熙、王維志,2011,〈委託技術服務審計稽核案例之探討〉,研究管理季刊:1-13。 經濟部工業局知識管理整合服務資訊網(無日期),常見問題Q21。2023年1月11日,取自:https://km.ekm.org.tw/KMPP2016/Web/Question.aspx?ID=97487619-5250-48ee-a8a1-a6f2a0f21089 。 廖衛邦,2001,《電子商務與知識管理應用於軍事機關採購作業之研究》,國防管理學院資源管理研究所碩士論文。 韓世澤,2004,〈知識管理應用於政府採購作業之研究以某政府機關為例〉,國立彰化師範大學會計學系碩士論文。 韓培爾編譯,2009,《社會科學博士碩士論文研究寫作Q &A》,台北:風雲論壇。 謝學如,2004,〈虛擬社群在公務部門知識管理運用之探究—以政府採購網路論壇為例〉,國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。 顏漏有,1999,〈推薦序-人與組織知識是企業家最重要的資產〉,《知識管理-企業組織如何有效運用知識》,臺中市:中國生產力中心,3-5頁。 瞿海源、畢恆達、劉長萱、楊國樞,2019,《社會及行為科學研究法:質性研究法》,臺北市:東華書局。 羅昌發,2008,《政府採購法與政府採購協定論析》,台北市:元照。 貳、英文部分 Ambrosini, V. & C. Bowman. 2001. “Tacit Knowledge: Some Suggestions for Operationalisation.”Journal of Management Studies 38(6):811-829. Argyris, C. 1994. “ Good Communication That Blocks Learning.” Harvard Business Review, 72(4):77-85. Becerra-Fernadez, I. & R. Sabherwal. 2001. “ Organizational Knowledge Management: A Contingency Perspective. ” Journal of Management Information Systems 18(1):23-55. Beckman, T. 1997. Implementing the Knowledge Organizational in Government, Paper & Presentation, 10th National Conference on Federal Quality,1997. Bereiter, C. 2002. Education and Mind in the Knowledge Age. Mahwah, NJ and London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Collins, H. 1993. “The Structure of Knowledge.” Social Research(60):95-116. Collins, H. 2001. “Tacit Knowledge, Trust and the Q of Sapphire.” Social Studies of Science 31(1):71-85. Davenport, Thomas H. & Laurence Prusak. 1998. Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know. Boston:Harvard Business School Press. Dixon, Nancy M. 2000. Common Knowledge: How Companies Thrive by Sharing What They Know. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. Essers, J. & J. Schreinemakers. 1997. “Nonaka’s Subjectivist Conception of Knowledge in Corporate Knowledge Management.” Knowledge Organization 24(1):24-32. Garvin, D. 1993. “Building a learning organizations.” Harvard Business Review July-August:78-91. Gilbert, Myrna & Martyn Gordey-Hayes. 1996. “Understanding The Process of Knowledge Transfer to Achieve Successful Technological Innovation.” Technovation 16(6):301-312. Goh, Swee C. 2002. “Managing effective knowledge transfer: an intergrative framework and some practice implications.” Journal of Knowledge Management 6 (1):23-30. Gourlay, S. 2006. “Conceptualizing Knowledge Creation: A Critique of Nonaka’s Theory.” Journal of Management Studies 43(7):1415-1436. Hazlett, Shirley Ann. Rodney Mcadam & Victor Beggs. 2008. “An Exploratory Study of Knowledge Flows: A Case Study of Public Sector Procurement.” Total Quality Management 19(1-2):57-66. Herbig, B. & A. Büssing. 2003. “Comparison of the Role of Explicit and Implicit Knowledge in Working.” Psychology Science 45(3):165-188. Kahoot! 2022. Workplace Culture Report. Retrieved Feb 22, 2023, from Kahoot! Web on the World Wide Web:https://kahoot.com/files/2022/10/Kahoot-2022-Workplace-Culture-Report-PDF.pdf . Jorna, R. 1998. Managing Knowledge, Semiotic Review of Books, 9(2). Laszlo, K. C. & A. Laszlo. 2002. “ Evolution Knowledge for Development: The Role of Knowledge Management in a Changing World.” Journal of Knowledge Management 6(4):400-412. Leonard-Barton, D. 1995. Wellsprings of Knowledge: Building and Sustaining the Source of Innovation. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. Miller, K. D. 2008. “ Simon and Polanyi on Rationality and Knowledge.” Organization Studies 29(7):933-955. Nonaka, I. & H. Takeuchi. 1995. The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. N.Y.: Oxford University Press. O’Dell, Carla & C. Jackson Grayson. 1998. “If Only We Knew What We Know: Identification and Transfer of Internal Best Practices.” California Management Review 40(30):154-174. Perkins, Robert A. & F. Lawrence Bennett. 2012. “Knowledge Transfer Need and Methods.” Final Report, INE/AUTC No. 510009, Alaska University Transportation Center, University of Alaska Fairbanks. Polanyi, M. 1966. The Tacit Dimension, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. Quinn, J. & P. Anderson & S. Finkelstein. 1996. “Leveraging Intellect.” Academy of Management Executive 10(3):7-27. Vaghefi, Isaac. Liette Lapointe & Hamidreza Shahbaznezhad. 2018. “A Multilevel Process View of Organizational Knowledge Transfer: Enablers Versus Barriers.” Journal of Management Analytics 5(1):1-17. Wiig, Karl M. 1993. Knowledge Management Foundation:Thinking about Thinking: How People and Organizations Create, Represent, and Use Knowledge, Schema Press. | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/89996 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 政府採購作業本身蘊含豐富的知識內容,組織內部單位或人員之間各種知識傳送、專業諮詢或意見溝通,即為各種採購知識移轉(傳送、吸收和利用)的過程,為知識管理中重要活動之一。本研究以中央政府某三級機關經公開評選之限制性招標勞務採購作業為例,並利用結合「外顯―內隱」和「6W」這兩種知識類型的「應用知識矩陣」來分析採購流程中所含納的知識類型,藉釐清不同類型的知識和歸納知識移轉的途徑,以便進一步檢視在政府採購流程中知識移轉的情形,並探討影響政府勞務採購知識移轉促進和阻礙的原因。
研究發現,此採購類型關鍵流程和知識聚焦在請購需求的簽辦、評選委員會成立與召開、履約管理及驗收這幾個階段,關鍵知識以標準化文件為主,執行時仍仰賴實務經驗知識判斷,兼具內隱性和外顯性,並可對照不同層次知識類型,從而得知若作業階段程序化較低時,須仰賴具備專業內隱知識的人員,才能發揮知識效果。 知識移轉途徑和促進或阻礙移轉因素,可從個人、團隊交流和組織三個層次進行分析。個人層次須累積知識和提升學習動機等能力,且與個人特質有關,團隊交流層次可能因個人知識或能力不足,加上各單位立場不同,產生可信度和信任感不足等知識移轉的阻礙,而必須上升到組織層次尋求解決,透過組織層次的教育訓練、長官指示、方便知識文件取用的知識管理系統等方式,以調節個人能力之不足,並於團隊交流不順暢時予以協助。由此可知三個層次會由上而下,或由下而上相互影響。 最後提出以下政策建議:優化教育訓練內容、完善而即時更新的組織內部文件範例並提供最佳實務移轉案例、和培訓採購種子人員並建立獎勵制度。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | The government procurement process contains a wealth of knowledge. There are various forms of knowledge transfer during professional consultation with interpersonal communication between personnel in each unit and department within the organization. How to transfer, absorb, and utilize the existing knowledge is a key component of the knowledge management processes. This research is based on the example of open selection limited tendering of service procurement at a third-level department of the central government. The research combines two types of "Knowledge Matrix Applications" – "explicit-tacit" and "6W", to analyze the types of knowledge in the procurement process, and to clarify different types of knowledge, along with the pathways of knowledge transfer used to further examine knowledge transfer during government procurement processes. This research will explore effectiveness of knowledge transfer enablers and barriers in government service procurement.
The study found that the key processes and knowledge of this type of procurement focus on the following few stages: they are 1) the drafting of request for proposal; 2) establishment and convening of meetings of the organization of the procurement evaluation committee; and 3) contract performance management and final acceptance. These stages of the process are primarily based on the use of standardized documents. However, in practice, this still requires practical experience and judgment to make sure the legality and legitimacy during the government procurement process – which is both tacit and explicit, and can be compared with different levels of knowledge types. If the instructions within an operational procedure are limited, it is necessary to rely on experienced personnel to make the knowledge transfer effective. Knowledge transfer pathways and the knowledge enablers and barriers can be analyzed on three different levels: individual, team/exchange, and organizational. Individuals must accumulate knowledge, improve their abilities and depend on personal traits, while teams/communications may be lacking in knowledge or abilities. Such a lack coupled with the different positions between each unit causes a lack of credibility and trust that can become an obstacle to knowledge transfer. In order to resolve this problem, seeking solutions from higher level organization is required. Insufficient personal ability can be improved through organizational-level employee training, executive instructions, and the establishment of a knowledge management system that facilitates access to knowledge documents, etc. Such development can also assist to smooth team communication.The three levels of individual, team/exchange and organization may interfere with each other from the top- down or the bottom-up. Finally, I propose the following three policy suggestions: 1) optimize the content of employee training, 2) perfect and update examples of internal organizational documents on a timely basis and to provide the best practice cases, and 3) train seed procurement personnel and establish a reward system. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2023-09-22T16:59:18Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2023-09-22T16:59:18Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員審定書 i
謝誌 ii 中文摘要 iii ABSTRACT v 目錄 viii 圖目次 x 表目次 xi 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的與問題 4 第三節 研究流程 5 第四節 研究範圍 6 第五節 研究限制 18 第二章 文獻探討 19 第一節 組織知識的內涵 19 第二節 組織知識移轉 30 第三節 政府採購知識移轉和勞務採購 45 第三章 研究設計 55 第一節 研究架構 55 第二節 研究方法 58 第三節 研究設計 60 第四章 研究發現 66 第一節 知識類型 66 第二節 知識移轉途徑和移轉情形 87 第三節 影響知識移轉成效因素 95 第四節 知識移轉問題解決方法 111 第五節 小結 116 第五章 結論與政策建議 121 第一節 研究結論 121 第二節 政策建議 126 參考文獻 130 | - |
dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
dc.title | 我國政府採購知識移轉研究―以中央某三級機關限制性招標經公開評選勞務採購案為例 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Knowledge Transfer of Government Procurement – Open Selection Limited Tendering of Service Procurement at a Third-Level Department of the Central Government | en |
dc.type | Thesis | - |
dc.date.schoolyear | 111-2 | - |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 蘇彩足;郭昱瑩 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Tsai-Tsu Su;Yu-Ying Kuo | en |
dc.subject.keyword | 政府採購,勞務採購,知識移轉, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Government procurement,Service procurement,Knowledge transfer, | en |
dc.relation.page | 136 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202303144 | - |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(限校園內公開) | - |
dc.date.accepted | 2023-08-10 | - |
dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | - |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 政治學系 | - |
顯示於系所單位: | 政治學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-111-2.pdf 授權僅限NTU校內IP使用(校園外請利用VPN校外連線服務) | 2.66 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。