Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 工學院
  3. 土木工程學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/89986
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor周中哲zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorChung-Che Chouen
dc.contributor.author林皇佐zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorHuang-Zuo Linen
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-22T16:56:54Z-
dc.date.available2023-11-09-
dc.date.copyright2023-09-22-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.date.submitted2023-08-08-
dc.identifier.citation1. FEMA 356 (2000), Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, ASCE for the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C..
2. AISC(2014), AISC Design Guide 29, Vertical Bracing Connections- Analysis and Design, American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago, Illinois.
3. AISC(2016), Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings, ANSI/AISC 341-16, American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago, Illinois.
4. AISC(2022), Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings, ANSI/AISC 341-22 , American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago, Illinois.
5. AISC(2016), Specification for Structural Steel Buildings, ANSI/AISC 360-16, American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago, Illinois.
6. AISC(2022), Specification for Structural Steel Buildings, ANSI/AISC 360-22, American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago, Illinois.
7. AISC(2017), Steel Construction Manual, 15th Ed, American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago, Illinois.
8. ASCE (2017), Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing Buildings. ASCE/SEI 41-17. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers.
9. ASCE (2016). Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures, ASCE/SEI 7-16, American Society of Civil Engineers, Washington, D.C
10. ASCE (2022). Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures, ASCE/SEI 7-22, American Society of Civil Engineers, Washington, D.C
11. AWS(2006), Structural welding code-steel. D1.1:2000,FL.
12. Suita, K., Yamada, S., Tada, M., Kasai, K., Matsuoka, Y., & Sato, E. (2008). Results of recent E-Defense tests on full-scale steel buildings: part 1—collapse experiments on 4-story moment frames. In Structures Congress 2008: Crossing Borders (pp. 1-10).
13. Chou C-C, Liu J-H.(2012) Frame and Brace Action Forces on Steel Corner Gusset Plate Connections in Buckling-Restrained Braced Frames. Earthquake Spectra. 2012;28(2):531-551.
14. Chou, C. C., & Chen, S. Y.(2010). Subassemblage tests and finite element analyses of sandwiched buckling-restrained braces. Engineering structures, 32(8), 2108-2121.
15. Chou, C. C., and Chen, G. W.(2020). Lateral cyclic testing and backbone curve development of high-strength steel built-up box columns under axial compression. Engineering Structures, 223, 111147.
16. Chou, C. C., Lin, T. H., Lai, Y. C., Xiong, H. C., Uang, C. M., Al-Tawil, S., McCormick, J. P., and Mosqueda, G.(2019). US-TAIWAN collaborative research on steel column through cyclic testing of two story subassemblages. International Conference in Commemoration of 20th Anniversary of the 1999 Chi-Chi Earthquake. Taipei, Taiwan, September 15-19, 2019.
17. Lin, T. H., & Chou, C. C.(2022). High-strength steel deep H-shaped and box columns under proposed near-fault and post-earthquake loadings. Thin-Walled Structures, 172, 108892.
18. Zhang, Z., Fleischman, R. B., Restrepo, J. I., Guerrini, G., Nema, A., Zhang, D., Ulina, S., Tsampras, G., Sause, R.,(2018). Shake‐table test performance of an inertial force‐limiting floor anchorage system. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 47(10), 1987-2011.
19. Chou, C. C., Córdova, A., Lin, H. Z., Chen, J. M., Chou, Y. H., Chao, S. H., Chao, S. H., Tsampras G., Uang, C. M., Chung H. Y., Hu H. T., Loh, C. H.(2022). Analysis and Test Plan for a Three-Story Steel BRBF with a Sliding Slab to Reduce Seismic Lateral Force in Shake Table Tests, 8th Asia Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Taipei, Taiwan.
20. 內政部營建署,「鋼結構極限設計法規範及解說」,2010年修正
21. 內政部營建署,「建築物耐震設計規範及解說」,2011年修正
22. 內政部營建署,「混凝土結構設計規範」,2021年修正
23. 陳昇陽(2008)「可更換核心板之挫屈束制消能支撐耐震實驗與有限元素分析」,碩士論文,國立交通大學土木工程系
24. 劉佳豪(2010)「挫屈束制消能支撐構架梁柱效應對接合板耐震行為研究」,碩士論文,國立臺灣大學土木工程系
25. 陳冠維(2019) 「高強度箱型鋼柱之耐震實驗與背骨曲線發展」,碩士論文,國立臺灣大學土木工程系
26. 熊厚淳(2020)「兩層樓子構架高強度箱型鋼柱耐震實驗與模擬分析」,碩士論文,國立臺灣大學土木工程系
27. 沈厚寬(2022)「實尺寸一層樓構架受高軸力及地震側力下之鋼柱耐震實驗」,碩士論文,國立臺灣大學土木工程系
28. 覃文康(2022)「實尺寸兩層樓夾型挫屈束制斜撐鋼構架在變軸力下之中等韌性構件箱型鋼柱耐震實驗」,碩士論文,國立臺灣大學土木工程系
29. 黃于慈(2023)「以訊號分析方法進行長期結構健康監測」,碩士論文,國立臺灣大學土木工程系
30. 陳建明(2023)「可變勁度之雙核心自復位斜撐與夾型挫屈束制斜撐於一層樓子構架耐震試驗」,碩士論文,國立臺灣大學土木工程系
-
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/89986-
dc.description.abstract本研究討論中等韌性斷面箱型鋼柱、全鋼型夾型挫屈束制斜撐及新型滑動樓版系統在振動台實驗中之耐震性能,製作一組三層樓實尺寸二元系統試體,鋼材使用CNS SN490B,箱型柱斷面寬厚比為20.5及21.1,滿足美國鋼結構耐震規範AISC 341-22之中等韌性斷面要求,以全鋼型夾型挫屈束制支撐作為試體中之斜撐,而試體樓版採用鋼筋混凝土預鑄樓版,樓版與構架間在不同階段中分別以全鋼型夾型挫屈束制支撐及T型軸力桿件連接。使用2022池上地震玉里測站東西向之地震紀錄作為實驗輸入之加速度歷時,實驗由小規模地震開始進行,逐次提高至最大規模為台面加速度達1.05 g。實驗結果顯示使用中等韌性斷面箱型鋼柱在初始軸力0.1Py下於層間位移達0.038 rad時仍能有良好耐震行為,箱型柱可發展至Mp及軸壓0.28Py且不發生局部挫屈。全鋼型夾型挫屈束制支撐作為試體中的斜撐,在實驗中最大軸向變形達2.6%,累積韌性容量達到749以上,表現出極佳的韌性及遲滯消能行為,可作為挫屈束制斜撐構架中良好的斜撐消能桿件。新型滑動樓版系統在實驗中被證實可以在地震時降低地震側向力,滑動量越大則慣性力降低比例越高,而使用全鋼型夾型挫屈束制支撐作為水平連接桿件能比使用T型軸力桿件提供額外消能,實驗中觀察到此機制可使樓版加速度降低25%,進一步降低地震力。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThis study discusses the seismic performance of moderately ductile box columns, all-steel sandwiched buckling-restrained braces, and a new sliding slab system in shake table tests. A full-scale three-story steel dual system specimen was constructed, with CNS SN490B steel used as the material. The box column sections had width-to-thickness ratios of 20.5 and 21.1, satisfying the requirements of the American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC) 341-22 for moderately ductile members. The specimen utilized all-steel sandwiched buckling-restrained braces as diagonal bracing, and the slabs consisted of precast reinforced concrete slabs. The slabs were connected to the frame using all-steel sandwiched buckling-restrained braces and T-members in different phases. The input acceleration history for the experiments was obtained from the 2022 Chishang earthquake Yuli seismic station in the east-west direction. The experiments started with small-scale earthquakes and gradually increased to the maximum scale with a table acceleration of 1.05 g. The experimental results demonstrate that the moderately ductile box columns exhibited good seismic behavior even when the story drift reached 0.038 rad under an initial axial force of 0.1Py. The columns were capable of developing plastic moment and resisting axial compression up to 0.28Py without experiencing local buckling. The all-steel sandwiched buckling-restrained braces used as diagonal bracing in the specimen achieved a maximum axial deformation of 2.6% and cumulative plastic ductility exceeding 749, demonstrating excellent ductility and hysteretic energy dissipation behavior. They can serve as effective energy dissipation elements in buckling-restrained brace frames. The new sliding slab system was proven to reduce seismic lateral forces during earthquakes. The larger the sliding displacement, the higher the reduction in inertial forces. Additionally, using all-steel sandwiched buckling-restrained braces as horizontal connecting elements provided additional energy dissipation compared to using T-members. It was observed during the experiment that this mechanism can reduce floor acceleration by 25%, resulting in further reduction of seismic forces.en
dc.description.provenanceSubmitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2023-09-22T16:56:54Z
No. of bitstreams: 0
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2023-09-22T16:56:54Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0en
dc.description.tableofcontents口試委員會審定書 i
誌謝 ii
摘要 iv
ABSTRACT v
目錄 vii
表目錄 xii
圖目錄 xiv
照片目錄 xxi
第一章 緒論 1
1.1 前言 1
1.2 文獻回顧 2
1.3 研究動機與目的 6
1.4 研究方法 6
1.5 論文架構 7
第二章 實尺寸三層樓鋼構架試體設計與實驗規劃 8
2.1 三層樓鋼構架試體規劃 8
2.2 三層樓鋼構架試體設計 10
2.2.1 柱桿件強度 10
2.2.2 梁桿件強度 12
2.2.3 梁柱交會區(Panel Zone) 12
2.2.4 強柱弱梁 12
2.2.5 夾型挫屈束制斜撐(D-SBRB) 13
2.2.6 斜撐接合板 13
2.2.7 鉸接接合 14
2.2.8 柱底螺栓 15
2.2.9 水平挫屈束制支撐(H-SBRB) 15
2.2.10 水平T型桿件 16
2.2.11 垂直構架方向斜撐 18
2.2.12 樓版接合螺栓 18
2.2.13 梁側向支撐 19
2.2.14 PISA3D模型分析 19
2.3 試體製作與安裝 20
2.3.1 預鑄混凝土樓版製作 20
2.3.2 鋼結構製作 21
2.3.3 試體安裝 22
2.4 量測系統 24
2.4.1 應變計配置 24
2.4.2 位移計配置 24
2.4.3 加速規配置 25
2.4.4 光學動態量測系統配置 25
2.5 試體力量位移計算方式 25
2.5.1 試體所受外力 26
2.5.2 試體位移量 26
2.5.3 桿件內力符號 27
2.5.4 桿件內力計算 28
2.5.5 桿件塑性彎矩強度計算 30
2.6 地震歷時與試驗流程 31
2.7 材料性質 31
第三章 實驗結果分析與討論 33
3.1 實驗觀察 33
3.1.1 第一階段 33
3.1.2 第二階段 35
3.2 試體整體反應分析 37
3.3 構架與樓版反應分析 42
3.3.1 絕對加速度 43
3.3.2 相對滑動量 43
3.3.3 滑動樓版討論 45
3.4 梁柱桿件反應分析 47
3.4.1 實驗中柱內力變化 47
3.4.2 實驗中梁內力變化 50
3.5 夾型挫屈束制支撐反應分析 53
3.6 試體水平力分布情況 55
3.7 水平連接桿件行為討論 57
3.8 實驗中柱底邊界條件檢討 59
3.9 試體檢討 59
3.10 實驗結果與PISA3D模型比較 60
3.11 小結 62
第四章 全鋼型夾型挫屈束制支撐性能試驗 63
4.1 試驗目的 63
4.2 試體製作 63
4.3 試驗配置 64
4.4 量測系統 65
4.5 加載方式 65
4.6 實驗結果分析與討論 66
4.6.1 SBRB900 66
4.6.2 SBRB400 69
4.6.3 SBRB900與SBRB400比較討論 70
4.7 實驗結果與SBRB設計比較 71
第五章 結論與建議 74
5.1 結論 74
5.2 建議 76
參考文獻 77
附錄A 試體設計圖 240
附錄B 構架位移量測方式 269
-
dc.language.isozh_TW-
dc.subject池上地震zh_TW
dc.subject夾型挫屈束制支撐zh_TW
dc.subject箱型鋼柱zh_TW
dc.subject滑動樓版zh_TW
dc.subjectSliding slaben
dc.subjectBox columnen
dc.subjectSandwiched buckling-restrained braceen
dc.subjectChishang earthquakeen
dc.title實尺寸三層樓鋼構架二元系統於2022池上地震下之振動台試驗:中等韌性箱型鋼柱、全鋼型夾型挫屈束制支撐及滑動樓版之耐震性能zh_TW
dc.titleShake Table Tests of a Full-Scale Three-Story Steel Dual Frame under the 2022 Chishang Earthquake: Seismic Performance of Moderately Ductile Box Column, all-Steel Sandwiched Buckling-Restrained Brace, and Sliding Slaben
dc.typeThesis-
dc.date.schoolyear111-2-
dc.description.degree碩士-
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee鍾興陽;吳東諭zh_TW
dc.contributor.oralexamcommitteeHsin-Yang Chung;Tung-Yu Wuen
dc.subject.keyword箱型鋼柱,滑動樓版,夾型挫屈束制支撐,池上地震,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordBox column,Sliding slab,Sandwiched buckling-restrained brace,Chishang earthquake,en
dc.relation.page276-
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU202303734-
dc.rights.note同意授權(限校園內公開)-
dc.date.accepted2023-08-10-
dc.contributor.author-college工學院-
dc.contributor.author-dept土木工程學系-
顯示於系所單位:土木工程學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-111-2.pdf
授權僅限NTU校內IP使用(校園外請利用VPN校外連線服務)
56.84 MBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved