請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/89918完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 楊鏡堂 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Jing-Tang Yang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 唐嘉宏 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Chia-Hung Tang | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-09-22T16:40:28Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2023-11-09 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2023-09-22 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2023 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2023-08-09 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Addo-Akoto, R., Han, J. S., & Han, J. H. (2021). Roles of wing flexibility and kinematics in flapping wing aerodynamics. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 104, 103317.
Bergou, A. J., Xu, S., & Wang, Z. J. (2007). Passive wing pitch reversal in insect flight. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 591, 321–337. Birch, J. M., & Dickinson, M. H. (2001). Spanwise flow and the attachment of the leading-edge vortex on insect wings. Nature, 412(6848), 729-733. Chang, S. K., Lai, Y. H., Lin, Y. J., & Yang, J. T. (2020). Enhanced lift and thrust via the translational motion between the thorax-abdomen node and the center of mass of a butterfly with a constructive abdominal oscillation. Physical Review E, 102(6), 62407. Chang, S. K., Lin, Y. J., Hsu, K. L., & Yang, J. T. (2023). Decoupling wing-shape effects of wing-swept angle and aspect ratio on a forward-flying butterfly. Physical Review E, 107, 065105 Combes, S. A., & Daniel, T. L. (2003a). Flexural stiffness in insect wings I. Scaling and the influence of wing venation. Journal of Experimental Biology, 206(17), 2979–2987. Combes, S. A., & Daniel, T. L. (2003b). Into thin air: Contributions of aerodynamic and inertial-elastic forces to wing bending in the hawkmoth Manduca sexta. Journal of Experimental Biology, 206(17), 2999–3006. Dickinson, M. H., Lehmann, F. O., & Sane, S. P. (1999). Wing rotation and the aerodynamic basis of insect right. Science, 284(5422), 1954–1960. Du, G., & Sun, M. (2010). Effects of wing deformation on aerodynamic forces in hovering hoverflies. Journal of Experimental Biology, 213(13), 2273–2283. Ellington, C. P. (1984). The aerodynamics of flapping animal flight. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 24(1), 95–105. Ellington, C. P., van den Berg, C., & Willmott, A. P. (1996). Leading-edge vortices in insect flight. Nature, 384, 626–630. Fang, Y. H., Tang, C. H., Lin, Y. J., Yeh, S. I., Yang, J.,T. (2023). The lift effects of chordwise wing deformation and body angle on low-speed flying butterflies. Biomimetics, 8, 287. Fei, Y. H. J., & Yang, J. T. (2016). Importance of body rotation during the flight of a butterfly. Physical Review E, 93(3), 1–10. Fuchiwaki, M., Kuroki, T., Tanaka, K., & Tababa, T. (2013). Dynamic behavior of the vortex ring formed on a butterfly wing. Experiments in Fluids, 54(1). Fujikawa, T., Sato, Y., Makata, Y., Yamashita, T., & Kikuchi, K. (2009). Motion analysis of butterfly-style flapping robot for different wing and body design. in 2008 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics, 216–221. Bangkok, Thailand. Fujikawa, T., Sato, Y., Yamashita, T., & Kikuchi, K. (2010). Development of a lead-lag mechanism using simple flexible links for a small butterfly-style flapping robot. 2010 World Automation Congress, 2–7. Kobe, Japan. Johansson, L. C., & Henningsson, P. (2021). Butterflies fly using efficient propulsive clap mechanism owing to flexible wings. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 18(174). Kang, C. K., & Shyy, W. (2013). Scaling law and enhancement of lift generation of an insect-size hovering flexible wing. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 10(85). Kang, C. K., & Shyy, W. (2014). Analytical model for instantaneous lift and shape deformation of an insect-scale flapping wing in hover. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 11(101). Lan, B., Lin, Y. J., Lai, Y. H., Tang, C. H., Yang, J. T. (2022). A neural network approach to estimate transient aerodynamic properties of a flapping wing system. Drones, 6, 210. Langley, K. R., Hardester, E., Thomson, S. L., & Truscott, T. T. (2014). Three-dimensional flow measurements on flapping wings using synthetic aperture PIV. Experiments in Fluids, 55(10). Lentink, D., & Dickinson, M. H. (2009a). Biofluiddynamic scaling of flapping, spinning and translating fins and wings. Journal of Experimental Biology, 212(16), 2691–2704. Lentink, D., & Dickinson, M. H. (2009b). Rotational accelerations stabilize leading edge vortices on revolving fly wings. Journal of Experimental Biology, 212(16), 2705–2719. Lin, Y. J., Chang, S. K., Lai, Y. H., & Yang, J. T. (2021). Beneficial wake-capture effect for forward propulsion with a restrained wing-pitch motion of a butterfly. Royal Society Open Science, 8(8). Montgomery, D. C., Runger, G. C., Hubele, N. F. (2010). Data summary and presentation. In Engineering Staticstics (pp. 48). John Wiley & Sons. Mountcastle, A. M., & Daniel, T. L. (2010). Vortexlet models of flapping flexible wings show tuning for force production and control. Bioinspiration and Biomimetics, 5(4). Nakata, T., & Liu, H. (2012). A fluid-structure interaction model of insect flight with flexible wings. Journal of Computational Physics, 231(4), 1822–1847. Nakata, T., Noda, R., & Liu, H. (2018). Effect of twist, camber and spanwise bending on the aerodynamic performance of flapping wings. Journal of Biomechanical Science and Engineering, 13(2). Ozawa, Y., Fujikawa, T., & Kikuchi, K. (2018). Analysis of turning motion for developing a butterfly-style flapping robot. MM Science Journal, 2198–2204. Phan, H. V., Truong, Q. T., Au, T. K. L., & Park, H. C. (2016). Optimal flapping wing for maximum vertical aerodynamic force in hover: Twisted or flat? Bioinspiration and Biomimetics, 11(4). Sane, S. P., & Dickinson, M. H. (2002). The aerodynamic effects of wing rotation and a revised quasi-steady model of flapping flight. Journal of Experimental Biology, 205(8), 1087-1096. Sane, S. P. (2003). The aerodynamics of insect flight. Journal of Experimental Biology, 206(23), 4191–4208. Senda, K., Obara, T., Kitamura, M., Yokoyama, N., Hirai, N., & Iima, M. (2012). Effects of structural flexibility of wings in flapping flight of butterfly. Bioinspiration and Biomimetics, 7(2). Shen, H., Ji, A., Li, Q., Li, X., & Ma, Y. (2022). Tensile mechanical properties and finite element simulation of the wings of the butterfly Tirumala limniace. Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 209, 239–251. Srygley, R. B., & Thomas, A. L. R. (2002). Unconventional lift-generating mechanisms in free-flying butterflies. Nature, 420(6916), 660–664. Sun, M., & Tang, J. (2002). Unsteady aerodynamic force generation by a model fruit fly wing in flapping motion. Journal of Experimental Biology, 205(1), 55–70. Suzuki, K., Aoki, T., & Yoshino, M. (2019). Effect of chordwise wing flexibility on flapping flight of a butterfly model using immersed-boundary lattice Boltzmann simulations. Physical Review E, 100(1), 1–16. Suzuki, K., Minami, K., & Inamuro, T. (2015). Lift and thrust generation by a butterfly-like flapping wing-body model: Immersed boundary-lattice Boltzmann simulations. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 767, 659–695. Tanaka, H., & Shimoyama, I. (2010). Forward flight of swallowtail butterfly with simple flapping motion. Bioinspiration and Biomimetics, 5(2). Truong, T. Q., Phan, V. H., Park, H. C., & Ko, J. H. (2013). Effect of wing twisting on aerodynamic performance of flapping wing system. AIAA Journal, 51(7), 1612–1620. Weis-Fogh, T. (1973). Quick estimates of flight fitness in hovering animals, including novel mechanisms for lift production. Journal of Experimental Biology 59, 169–230. Wootton, R. J. (1993). Leading edge section and asymmetric twisting in the wings of flying butterflies (Insecta, Papilionoidea). Journal of Experimental Biology, 180(1), 105–117. Young, J., Walker, S. M., Bomphrey, R. J., Taylor, G. K., & Thomas, A. L. R. (2009). Details of insect wing design and deformation enhance aerodynamic function and flight efficiency. Science, 325(5947), 1549–1552. Zheng, L., Hedrick, T. L., & Mittal, R. (2013). Time-varying wing-twist improves aerodynamic efficiency of forward flight in butterflies. PLoS ONE, 8(1), 1–10. 邱筠雅(2020)。撓性與旋轉角於大白斑蝶及仿蝴蝶拍撲機構升力之影響。國立臺灣大學機械工程學系碩士論文,臺北市。 洪千茵(2021)。仿蝴蝶飛行器機構設計與模擬飛行測試。國立臺灣大學機械工程學系碩士論文,臺北市。 鄭家枏(2022)。撓性與翅腹動作相位差對仿蝴蝶機構升推力之影響。國立臺灣大學機械工程學系碩士論文,臺北市。 林有駿(2022)。蝴蝶飛行之翅膀旋轉動力機制分析與翅膀撓性效應。國立臺灣大學機械工程學系博士論文,臺北市。 張勝凱(2022)。蝴蝶翅膀形狀、翅膀撓曲變形與翅膀身體耦合運動之飛行動力機制。國立臺灣大學機械工程學系博士論文,臺北市。 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/89918 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本文旨在分析蝴蝶翅膀撓曲變形動態以及其對於飛行動態的影響,並聚焦於展向撓曲變形。首先簡化翅膀曲面變形函數,提出展向變形重要參數:傾角之斜率(SoA),以利歸納。以三部高速攝影機拍攝七隻大白斑蝶共72次的前飛數據,取12組較無偏航且散布於慢平飛、慢爬升、快平飛、快爬升四個象限的飛行資料進行分析,以獲得不同飛行狀態下的翅膀動態。
實驗結果顯示翼旋轉角峰值領先0.1相位約可增加0.3 m/s的平均總速率,而SoA峰值領先0.1相位約可增加0.1的垂直速率比例。此外,大白斑蝶與過去文獻被動旋轉翅傾角數據的比對以及翼旋轉角峰值相位與展向變形峰值相位呈正相關的現象,皆支持蝴蝶得以使用根部肌肉間接以慣性延遲控制展向變形的論點。 數值模擬結果與生物實驗歸納的策略預測相符,翼旋轉角領先有較大的平均總速率,而SoA相位領先除了同實驗歸納有較大的垂直速率比例外,亦有較大的平均總速率。然而所需功率皆大幅上升,使升力效率降低15%至42%不等,此策略僅適合用於操控用途,穩定前飛時適合採用原始正常相位。爬升與加速最有效果的策略皆為翼旋轉角正常相位、SoA領先0.1相位的飛行,相較正常相位飛行,平均總速率增加30.9%、垂直速率比例增加29.9%,然而升力效率降低26.43%。 在SoA領先0.1相位的飛行中,上拍後期過小的傾角使翼面力導至垂直方向,產生負升力峰值。本文於數值模擬中以延遲身體俯仰角0.1相位使翼面方向改變,結果顯示最多可降低負升力28.08%。本文亦發現蝴蝶具自主俯仰角調節機制,同樣可使翼面力重新導向。 未來設計拍撲翼微飛行器時若有快速爬升或加速的需求,可採用蝴蝶構型並裝配較剛性的被動旋轉翅,使翅膀受到慣性後SoA相位較提前,並以正常相位之翼旋轉飛行。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | This study analyzes the wing spanwise deformation of butterfly and its impact on flight dynamics. The wing’s surface function was simplified, and a crucial parameter for spanwise deformation, the slope of angle-of-incidnece (SoA), was introduced. Butterflies in forward flight were captured by three high-speed cameras, and twelve datasets covering various flight conditions were employed for the analysis.
The biological experimental results indicated that a 0.1 phase lead in the peak of wing rotation angle could lead to an increase of approximately 0.3 m/s in mean total velocity. Also, a 0.1 phase lead in the peak of SoA exhibited an increase of approximately 0.1 in the vertical velocity ratio. The angle-of-incidence dynamics of Idea leuconoe were compared with those of a passively rotating wing from earlier literature. Furthermore, a positive correlation between the peak phase of wing rotation angle and the peak phase of spanwise deformation was noted. These observations both bolster the argument that butterflies can indirectly control wing spanwise deformation through root muscles. The numerical simulation results align well with the strategies inferred from biological experiments. Advancing the wing rotation angle phase leads to a higher mean total velocity. Whereas an advanced SoA phase not only yields a greater vertical velocity ratio, as observed in biological experiments, but also contributes to a higher mean total velocity. However, these strategies entail a significant increase in required power, resulting in a reduction in lift efficiency ranging from 15% to 42%. Consequently, the strategies involving advanced wing rotation angle phase or advanced SoA phase are primarily suitable for maneuvering purposes, whereas stable forward flight is best achieved by utilizing the original normal phase. Among these cases, employing normal phase of wing rotation angle coupled with a 0.1 phase-leading SoA phase proves to be the most effective strategy for climbing and acceleration. Compared to normal phase flight, this strategy leads to a 30.9% increase in mean total velocity and a 29.9% increase in vertical velocity ratio, but yields a corresponding reduction of 26.43% in lift efficiency. In flight where the SoA phase advanced, a deficiency in the angle-of-incidence during the latter stage of the upstroke results in a negative peak lift. In this study, a delay of the body pitch angle by 0.1 phase was introduced in the numerical simulation to address this issue. The results showed that this adjustment can reduce the negative lift by up to 28.08%. Additionally, this study revealed that butterflies possess an inherent mechanism for autonomously adjusting the body pitch angle, which similarly aids in reducing negative lift. In the prospective development of flapping-wing micro air vehicles, if a requirement for rapid ascension or acceleration arises, the design can adopt a butterfly-like configuration, combined with more rigid passively rotating wings. Such a wing design would result in an advanced SoA phase. Within this configuration, flight with normal-phase wing rotation facilitates effective climbing and acceleration. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2023-09-22T16:40:28Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2023-09-22T16:40:28Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書 i
謝辭 ii 摘要 iii Abstract iv 符號說明 vi 目錄 viii 表目錄 xi 圖目錄 xii 第一章 前言 1 第二章 文獻回顧 3 2-1 昆蟲飛行空氣動力學 3 2-1.1 翼前緣渦旋貼附 3 2-1.2 拍撲轉換期間與翼旋轉 6 2-1.3 夾翼與拋翼 8 2-2 蝴蝶飛行動態研究 9 2-2.1 身體與腹部動態 9 2-2.2 翼旋轉 10 2-2.3 前翅掃掠 11 2-2.4 蝴蝶飛行流場 11 2-3 翅膀變形與撓性 13 2-3.1 蝴蝶翅膀撓曲變形 14 2-3.2 蝴蝶翅膀材料性質 17 2-3.3 仿蝴蝶拍撲翼 18 2-3.4 翅被動旋轉 19 2-4 小結與研究動機 22 第三章 研究方法 23 3-1 生物實驗 23 3-1.1 實驗對象 23 3-1.2 生物動態實驗 24 3-1.3 動作參數 25 3-1.4 翅膀曲面建構 28 3-1.5 撓性翅膀曲面參數定義 32 3-2 數值模擬 34 3-2.1 物理模型 35 3-2.2 網格設定 37 3-2.3 求解器設定 38 3-2.4 數值模擬驗證 39 3-2.5 TOW模型 40 3-2.6 無因次化 41 第四章 結果與討論 42 4-1 生物實驗結果分析 42 4-1.1 傾角動態 43 4-1.2 飛行動態歸納 45 4-2 穩態相位改變 46 4-2.1 飛行軌跡 48 4-2.2 飛行速度 50 4-2.3 升推力 52 4-2.4 氣動力矩 54 4-2.5 拍撲攻角 54 4-2.6 下拍流場分析 57 4-2.7 上拍流場分析 62 4-3 暫態相位改變 63 4-3.1 第一週期 65 4-3.2 第二週期 67 4-4 身體俯仰角調整 69 4-4.1 升推力 70 4-4.2 飛行軌跡 72 4-4.3 俯仰角調節機制 73 4-5 小結 73 第五章 結論與未來展望 76 5-1 結論 76 5-2 未來展望 77 5-3 甘特圖 78 第六章 參考文獻 79 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.subject | 翼旋轉角 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 蝴蝶飛行 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 俯仰穩定性 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 翅膀展向撓曲變形 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | butterfly flight | en |
| dc.subject | wing spanwise deformation | en |
| dc.subject | wing rotation angle | en |
| dc.subject | pitch stability | en |
| dc.title | 蝴蝶展向撓曲變形相位差對飛行操控之影響 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The Impact of Wing Spanwise Deformation Phase on Flight Maneuverability of Butterfly | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 111-2 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 陳志鴻;王安邦;陳志臣 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Chih-Hung Chen;An-Bang Wang;Jyh-Chen Chen | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 蝴蝶飛行,翼旋轉角,翅膀展向撓曲變形,俯仰穩定性, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | butterfly flight,wing rotation angle,wing spanwise deformation,pitch stability, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 83 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202303743 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 未授權 | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2023-08-11 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 機械工程學系 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 機械工程學系 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-111-2.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 10.42 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
