Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 公共衛生學院
  3. 流行病學與預防醫學研究所
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/89631
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor李文宗zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorWen-Chung Leeen
dc.contributor.author高嘉彣zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorChia-Wen Kaoen
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-13T16:09:19Z-
dc.date.available2023-11-09-
dc.date.copyright2023-09-13-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.date.submitted2023-08-08-
dc.identifier.citation1. Chiang CJ, Wang YW, Lee WC. Taiwan's nationwide cancer registry system of 40 years: past, present, and future. J Formos Med Assoc. 2019 May;118(5):856-858. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2019.01.012. Epub 2019 Feb 14. PMID: 30773272.
2. Kao CW, Chiang CJ, Lin LJ, Huang CW, Lee WC, Lee MY; Taiwan Society of Cancer Registry Expert Group; Senior Cancer Registrars. Accuracy of long-form data in the Taiwan cancer registry. J Formos Med Assoc. 2021 Nov;120(11):2037-2041. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2021.04.022. Epub 2021 May 19. PMID: 34020856.
3. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology. 1982 Apr;143(1):29-36. doi: 10.1148/radiology.143.1.7063747. PMID: 7063747.
4. Lee WC. Probabilistic analysis of global performances of diagnostic tests: interpreting the Lorenz curve-based summary measures. Stat Med. 1999 Feb 28;18(4):455-71. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19990228)18:4<455::aid-sim44>3.0.co;2-a. PMID: 10070686.
5. Wu YC, Lee WC. Alternative performance measures for prediction models. PLoS One. 2014 Mar 7;9(3):e91249. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0091249. PMID: 24608868; PMCID: PMC3946724.
6. Ang KK, Harris J, Wheeler R, Weber R, Rosenthal DI, Nguyen-Tân PF, Westra WH, Chung CH, Jordan RC, Lu C, Kim H, Axelrod R, Silverman CC, Redmond KP, Gillison ML. Human papillomavirus and survival of patients with oropharyngeal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010 Jul 1;363(1):24-35. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0912217. Epub 2010 Jun 7. PMID: 20530316; PMCID: PMC2943767.
7. Huang SH, Xu W, Waldron J, Siu L, Shen X, Tong L, Ringash J, Bayley A, Kim J, Hope A, Cho J, Giuliani M, Hansen A, Irish J, Gilbert R, Gullane P, Perez-Ordonez B, Weinreb I, Liu FF, O'Sullivan B. Refining American Joint Committee on Cancer/Union for International Cancer Control TNM stage and prognostic groups for human papillomavirus-related oropharyngeal carcinomas. J Clin Oncol. 2015 Mar 10;33(8):836-45. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.58.6412. Epub 2015 Feb 9. PMID: 25667292.
8. Shindoh J, Andreou A, Aloia TA, Zimmitti G, Lauwers GY, Laurent A, Nagorney DM, Belghiti J, Cherqui D, Poon RT, Kokudo N, Vauthey JN. Microvascular invasion does not predict long-term survival in hepatocellular carcinoma up to 2 cm: reappraisal of the staging system for solitary tumors. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Apr;20(4):1223-9. doi: 10.1245/s10434-012-2739-y. Epub 2012 Nov 21. PMID: 23179993; PMCID: PMC3856190.
9. Chan AC, Fan ST, Poon RT, Cheung TT, Chok KS, Chan SC, Lo CM. Evaluation of the seventh edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer tumour-node-metastasis (TNM) staging system for patients undergoing curative resection of hepatocellular carcinoma: implications for the development of a refined staging system. HPB (Oxford). 2013 Jun;15(6):439-48. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2012.00617.x. Epub 2012 Dec 2. PMID: 23659567; PMCID: PMC3664048.
10. Rami-Porta R, Bolejack V, Crowley J, Ball D, Kim J, Lyons G, Rice T, Suzuki K, Thomas CF Jr, Travis WD, Wu YL; IASLC Staging and Prognostic Factors Committee, Advisory Boards and Participating Institutions. The IASLC lung cancer staging project: proposals for the revisions of the T descriptors in the forthcoming eighth edition of the TNM classification for lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2015 Jul;10(7):990-1003. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0000000000000559. PMID: 26134221.
11. Goldstraw P, Chansky K, Crowley J, Rami-Porta R, Asamura H, Eberhardt WE, Nicholson AG, Groome P, Mitchell A, Bolejack V; International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Staging and Prognostic Factors Committee, Advisory Boards, and Participating Institutions; International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Staging and Prognostic Factors Committee Advisory Boards and Participating Institutions. The IASLC lung cancer staging project: proposals for revision of the TNM stage groupings in the forthcoming (eighth) edition of the TNM classification for lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2016 Jan;11(1):39-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2015.09.009. PMID: 26762738.
12. Epstein JI, Zelefsky MJ, Sjoberg DD, Nelson JB, Egevad L, Magi-Galluzzi C, Vickers AJ, Parwani AV, Reuter VE, Fine SW, Eastham JA, Wiklund P, Han M, Reddy CA, Ciezki JP, Nyberg T, Klein EA. A contemporary prostate cancer grading system: a validated alternative to the gleason score. Eur Urol. 2016 Mar;69(3):428-35. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.06.046. Epub 2015 Jul 10. PMID: 26166626; PMCID: PMC5002992.
13. Abdel-Rahman O. Assessment of the prognostic value of the 8th AJCC staging system for patients with clinically staged prostate cancer; A time to sub-classify stage IV? PLoS One. 2017 Nov 28;12(11):e0188450. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188450. PMID: 29182656; PMCID: PMC570512
-
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/89631-
dc.description.abstract背景及目的
美國癌症聯合委員會(AJCC)的分期手冊在全球被廣泛認可且經過定期的修訂。本研究旨在評估比較AJCC第8版與第7版在台灣癌症分類上的表現。
方法
本研究利用台灣癌症登記資料,納入2017年(AJCC第7版)和2018年(AJCC第8版)診斷的癌症病例,進行2年的追蹤。使用ROC (receiver operating characteristic)曲線下面積(area under the curve, AUC)和基於Lorenz曲線的Gini係數進行評估。
結果
在研究的20個癌症部位/亞型中,根據 ∆ AUC或 ∆ Gini,我們發現口咽癌、肝癌、非小細胞肺癌、前列腺癌在AJCC第8版的分期表現上有顯著的改善。在口咽癌的患者中,第1期患者的兩年存活率增加,而4A和4C期患者的兩年存活率下降。肝癌的兩年存活率在第8版中隨著癌症期別越高而降低,但在第7版中,3B期患者的存活率(15.7%)甚至低於3C期(28.7%)和4A期(16.2%)。第8版在非小細胞肺癌上實現了更精細的預後分期,分離出1A1、1A2和1A3期,並辨別出較沒那麼嚴重的4A期患者。前列腺癌在第7版中有26.4%的4期患者可以重新分類為第8版的3期或4A期,分離出來的患者的存活率都超過90%。
結論
我們的研究結果發現AJCC分期系統第8版的修訂對台灣的口咽癌、肝癌、非小細胞肺癌和前列腺癌存活曲線的分離產生了正面的影響。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractBackground:
The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging manual is globally recognized and regularly revised. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the AJCC 8th edition compared to the 7th edition in Taiwan.
Methods:
Data from the Taiwan Cancer Registry were utilized for this study. Cancer cases diagnosed in 2017 (AJCC 7th edition) and 2018 (AJCC 8th edition) were included, and follow-up for 2 years. The performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and the Lorenz curve-based Gini index.
Results:
Among the 20 cancer sites/subtypes studied, 4 cancers (described below) showed significantly improved performance in the 8th edition, as indicated by ∆AUC or ∆Gini. For the 2-year survival rates of oropharyngeal cancer, the rate increased for stage 1 patients and decreased for stage 4A and 4C patients. The survival rates for liver cancer decreased with advanced stages in the 8th edition, but in the 7th edition, the rate in 3B (15.7%) was even lower than those in 3C (28.7%) and 4A (16.2%). For non-small cell lung cancer, the split-out stages 1A1, 1A2, and 1A3 had achieved a more refined prognostic staging in the 8th edition, and the split-out stage 4A had identified a group of patients with a less dire prognosis. For prostate cancer, 26.4% of 7th‘s stage 4 patients could be reclassified as 8th’s stage 3 or stage 4A, with a survival rate exceeding 90%.
Conclusions:
Our study findings demonstrate that the revisions in the 8th edition of the AJCC staging system had a positive effect on the separation of survival curves for oropharyngeal, liver, non-small cell lung, and prostate cancer in Taiwan.
en
dc.description.provenanceSubmitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2023-09-13T16:09:19Z
No. of bitstreams: 0
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2023-09-13T16:09:19Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0en
dc.description.tableofcontents誌謝 i
中文摘要 ii
Abstract iii
Contents iv
List of Tables v
List of Figures vi
List of Supplementary vii
Chapter 1 Introduction 1
Chapter 2 Materials and Methods 2
Chapter 3 Results 5
Chapter 4 Discussion 8
References 13
Supplementary 22
-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.subject台灣癌症登記zh_TW
dc.subjectAJCC分期系統zh_TW
dc.subject癌症預後zh_TW
dc.subjectGini係數zh_TW
dc.subject癌症分期zh_TW
dc.subject兩年存活率zh_TW
dc.subjectAUCzh_TW
dc.subjectcancer prognosisen
dc.subjectAJCC staging systemen
dc.subjectcancer stagingen
dc.subjectTaiwan Cancer Registryen
dc.subjectAUCen
dc.subjectGini indexen
dc.subject2-year survival ratesen
dc.title美國癌症聯合委員會分期系統有效性評估:第7版和第8版比較分析zh_TW
dc.titleAssessment of the Effectiveness of the AJCC Cancer Staging System: A Comparative Analysis of the 7th and 8th Editionsen
dc.typeThesis-
dc.date.schoolyear111-2-
dc.description.degree碩士-
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee今中雄一;江濬如;廖勇柏zh_TW
dc.contributor.oralexamcommitteeYuichi Imanaka;Chun-Ju Chiang;Yung-Po Liawen
dc.subject.keywordAJCC分期系統,癌症分期,台灣癌症登記,AUC,Gini係數,兩年存活率,癌症預後,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordAJCC staging system,cancer staging,Taiwan Cancer Registry,AUC,Gini index,2-year survival rates,cancer prognosis,en
dc.relation.page25-
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU202303553-
dc.rights.note同意授權(全球公開)-
dc.date.accepted2023-08-08-
dc.contributor.author-college公共衛生學院-
dc.contributor.author-dept流行病學與預防醫學研究所-
顯示於系所單位:流行病學與預防醫學研究所

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-111-2.pdf1.38 MBAdobe PDF檢視/開啟
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved