Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 公共衛生學院
  3. 流行病學與預防醫學研究所
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/89627
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor方啓泰zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorChi-Tai Fangen
dc.contributor.author胡雅莉zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorYa-Li Huen
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-13T16:08:12Z-
dc.date.available2023-11-09-
dc.date.copyright2023-09-13-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.date.submitted2023-07-15-
dc.identifier.citation1.Schmidt NJ, Lennette EH, Ho HH. An apparently new enterovirus isolated from patients with disease of the central nervous system. J Infect Dis. 1974;129:304–9.
2.Shindarov LM, Chumakov MP, Voroshilova MK, Bojinov S, Vasilenko SM, Iordanov I, et al. Epidemiological, clinical and pathomorphological characteristics of epidemic poliomyelitis-like disease caused by enterovirus 71. J Hyg Epidemiol Microbiol Immunol. 1979;23:284–95.
3.Nagy G, Takatsy S, Kukan E, Mihaly I, Domok I. Virological diagnosis of enterovirus type 71 infections: experiences gained during an epidemic of acute CNS diseases in Hungary in 1978. Arch Virol. 1982;71:217–27.
4.Podin Y, Gias EL, Ong F, Leong YW, Yee SF, Yusof MA, et al. Sentinel surveillance for human enterovirus 71 in Sarawak, Malaysia: lessons from the first 7 years. BMC Public Health. 2006;6:180.
5.Horwood PF, Andronico A, Tarantola A, Salje H, Duong V, Mey C, et al. Seroepidemiology of human enterovirus 71 infection among children. Cambodia Emerg Infect Dis. 2016;22:92–5.
6.Chang LY. Enterovirus 71 in Taiwan. Pediatr Neonatol. 2008;49:103–12.
7.Ooi MH, Wong SC, Lewthwaite P, Cardosa MJ, Solomon T. Clinical features, diagnosis, and management of enterovirus 71. Lancet Neurol. 2010;9:1097–105.
8.World Health Organization. Outbreak of hand, foot, and mouth disease in Sarawak: cluster of deaths among infants and young children. Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 1997;72:211–2.
9.Ho M, Chen ER, Hsu KH, Twu SJ, Chen KT, Tsai SF, et al. An epidemic of enterovirus 71 infection in Taiwan. Taiwan enterovirus epidemic working group. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:929–35.
10.Hoang CQ, Nguyen HD, Ho NX, Vu THT, Pham TTM, Nguyen KT, et al. Incidence of infection of enterovirus 71 and Coxsackieviruses A6 and A16 among household contacts of index cases in Dong Thap Province, Southern Vietnam. Biomed Res Int. 2020;2020:9850351.
11.Zhuang ZC, Kou ZQ, Bai YJ, Cong X, Wang LH, Li C, et al. Epidemiological research on hand, foot, and mouth disease in mainland China. Viruses. 2015;7:6400–11.
12.Horwood PF, Andronico A, Tarantola A, Salje H, Duong V, Mey C, et al. Seroepidemiology of human enterovirus 71 infection among children, Cambodia. Emerg Infect Dis. 2016;22:92–5.
13.Duong V, Mey C, Eloit M, Zhu H, Danet L, Huang Z, et al. Molecular epidemiology of human enterovirus 71 at the origin of an epidemic of fatal hand, foot and mouth disease cases in Cambodia. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2016;5:e104.
14.Bubba L, Broberg EK, Jasir A, Simmonds P, Harvala H. Circulation of nonpolio enteroviruses in 24 EU and EEA countries between 2015 and 2017: a retrospective surveillance study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020;20:350–61.
15.Hu YL, Chen CM, Wang ET, Kuo HW, Shih WL, Fang CT, et al. The secular trend of enterovirus A71 after the implementation of preventive measures in Taiwan. BMC Public Health. 2022 Aug 4;22(1):1483.
16.https://www.cdc.gov.tw/ (統計專區與傳染病介紹)
17.Lin TY, Chang LY, Hsia SH, Huang YC, Chiu CH, Hsueh C, et al. The 1998 enterovirus 71 outbreak in Taiwan: pathogenesis and management. Clin Infect Dis. 2002;34(Suppl 2):S52–7.
18.Chang LY, Hsia SH, Wu CT, Huang YC, Lin KL, Fang TY, et al. Outcome of enterovirus 71 infections with or without stage-based management: 1998 to 2002. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2004;23:327–32.
19.Lee JT, Yen TY, Shih WL, Lu CY, Liu DP, Huang YC, et al. Enterovirus 71 seroepidemiology in Taiwan in 2017 and comparison of those rates in 1997, 1999 and 2007. PLoS One. 2019;14:e0224110.
20.Chen Y, Badaruddin H, Lee VJ, Cutter J, Cook AR. The effect of school closure on hand, foot, and mouth disease transmission in Singapore: a modeling approach. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2018;99:1625–32.
21.Lu CY, Huang LM, Fan TY, Cheng AL, Chang LY. Incidence of respiratory viral infections and associated factors among children attending a public kindergarten in Taipei City. J Formos Med Assoc. 2018;117:132–40.
22.Chang LY, Tsao KC, Hsia SH, Shih SR, Huang CG, Chan WK, et al. Transmission and clinical features of enterovirus 71 infections in household contacts in Taiwan. JAMA. 2004;291:222–7.
23.Wong SS, Yip CC, Lau SK, Yuen KY. Human enterovirus 71 and hand, foot and mouth disease. Epidemiol Infect. 2010;138:1071–89.
24.Zhang Y, Zhu Z, Yang W, Ren J, Tan X, Wang Y, et al. An emerging recombinant human enterovirus 71 responsible for the 2008 outbreak of hand foot and mouth disease in Fuyang city of China. Virol J. 2010;7:94.
25.Zhao YY, Jin H, Zhang XF, Wang B. Case-fatality of hand, foot and mouth disease associated with EV71: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Epidemiol Infect. 2015;143:3094–102.
26.Lu CY, Lee CY, Kao CL, Shao WY, Lee PI, Twu SJ, et al. Incidence and casefatality rates resulting from the 1998 enterovirus 71 outbreak in Taiwan. J Med Virol. 2002;67:217–23.
27.Liu DP, Wang TA, Huang WT, Chang LY, Wang ET, Cheng SH, et al. Disease burden of enterovirus infection in Taiwan: Implications for vaccination policy. Vaccine 2016;34:974-80.
28.Nguyen TT, Chiu CH, Lin CY, Chiu NC, Chen PY, Le TTV, et al. Efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of an inactivated, adjuvanted enterovirus 71 vaccine in infants and children: a multiregion, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2022;399:1708-17.
29.Chuang YY, Huang YC. Enteroviral infection in neonates. J Microbiol Immunol Infect 2019;52:851-7.
30.Sandoni M, Ciardo L, Tamburini C, Boncompagni A, Rossi C, Guidotti I, et al. Enteroviral Infections in the First Three Months of Life. Pathogens 2022;11:60.
31.Chen YC, Yang SL, Yang H, Lin TY, Hsieh YC, Huang KA, et al. Clinical characteristics of echovirus 11 and coxsackievirus B5 infections in Taiwanese children requiring hospitalization. J Microbiol Immunol Infect 2021;54:581-7.
32.Modlin JF, Polk BF, Horton P, Etkind P, Crane E, Spiliotes A. Perinatal echovirus infection: risk of transmission during a community outbreak. N Engl J Med 1981;305:368-71.
33.Lin TY, Kao HT, Hsieh SH, Huang YC, Chiu CH, Chou YH, et al. Neonatal enterovirus infections: emphasis on risk factors of severe and fatal infections. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2003;22:889-94.
34.Khetsuriani N, Lamonte A, Oberste MS, Pallansch M. Neonatal enterovirus infections reported to the national enterovirus surveillance system in the United States, 1983-2003. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2006;25:889-93.
35.Jaïdane H, Halouani A, Jmii H, Elmastour F, Mokni M, Aouni M. Coxsackievirus B4 vertical transmission in a murine model. Virol J 2017;14:16.
36.Axelsson C, Bondestam K, Frisk G, Bergström S, Diderholm H. Coxsackie B virus infections in women with miscarriage. J Med Virol 1993;39:282-5.
37.Hwang JH, Kim JW, Hwang JY, Lee KM, Shim HM, Bae YK, et al. Coxsackievirus B infection is highly related with missed abortion in Korea. Yonsei Med J 2014;55:1562-7.
38.Bubba L, Martinelli M, Pellegrinelli L, Primache V, Tanzi E, Pariani E, et al. A 4-year Study on Epidemiologic and Molecular Characteristics of Human Parechoviruses and Enteroviruses Circulating in Children Younger Than 5 Years in Northern Italy. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2017;36:13-9.
39.Sun S, Bian L, Gao F, Du R, Hu Y, Fu Y, et al. A neonatal mouse model of Enterovirus D68 infection induces both interstitial pneumonia and acute flaccid myelitis. Antiviral Res 2019;161:108-15.
40.Lee JT, Shih WL, Yen TY, Cheng AL, Lu CY, Chang LY, et al. Enterovirus D68 seroepidemiology in Taiwan, a cross sectional study from 2017. PLoS One 2020;15:e0230180.
41.Huang WC, Huang LM, Kao CL, Lu CY, Shao PL, Cheng AL, et al. Seroprevalence of enterovirus 71 and no evidence of crossprotection of enterovirus 71 antibody against the other enteroviruses in kindergarten children in Taipei city. J Microbiol Immunol Infect 2012;45:96-101.
42.Hu YL, Lin SY, Lee CN, Shih JC, Cheng AL, Chen SH, et al. Serostatus of echovirus 11, coxsackievirus B3 and enterovirus D68 in cord blood: The implication of severe newborn enterovirus infection. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2023 Jun 1:S1684-1182(23)00112-3.
43.Sun S, Gao F, Hu Y, Bian L, Wu X, Su Y, et al. A cross-sectional seroepidemiology study of EV-D68 in China. Emerg Microbes Infect 2018;7:99.
44.Luo ST, Chiang PS, Chao AS, Liou GY, Lin R, Lin TY, et al. Enterovirus 71 maternal antibodies in infants, Taiwan. Emerg Infect Dis 2009;15:581-4.
45.van den Berg JP, Westerbeek EA, van der Klis FR, Berbers GA, van Elburg RM. Transplacental transport of IgG antibodies to preterm infants: a review of the literature. Early Hum Dev 2011;87:67-72.
46.Linder N, Taushtein I, Handsher R, Ohel G, Reichman B, Barzilai A, et al. Placental transfer of maternal poliovirus antibodies in full-term and pre-term infants. Vaccine 1998;16:236-9.
47.Salur L, Oikarinen S, Tauriainen S, Mandel M, Hyöty H, Uibo R. Enterovirus infections in young infants: are children still protected by maternal antibodies? Hum Vaccin 2011;7:966-71.
48.Hoang CQ, Nguyen HD, Ho NX, Vu THT, Pham TTM, Nguyen KT, et al. Incidence of Infection of Enterovirus 71 and Coxsackieviruses A6 and A16 among Household Contacts of Index Cases in Dong Thap Province, Southern Vietnam. Biomed Res Int 2020;2020:9850351.
49.Chang LY, Tsao KC, Hsia SH, Shih SR, Huang CG, Chan WK, et al. Transmission and clinical features of enterovirus 71 infections in household contacts in Taiwan. JAMA 2004;291:222-7.
50.Lee JT, Yen TY, Shih WL, Lu CY, Liu DP, Huang YC, et al. Enterovirus 71 seroepidemiology in Taiwan in 2017 and comparison of those rates in 1997, 1999 and 2007. PLoS One 2019;14:e0224110.
51.Wei X, Yang J, Gao L, Wang L, Liao Q, Qiu Q, et al. The transfer and decay of maternal antibodies against enterovirus A71, and dynamics of antibodies due to later natural infections in Chinese infants: a longitudinal, paired mother-neonate cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis 2021;21:418-26.
52.Flannery DD, Gouma S, Dhudasia MB, Mukhopadhyay S, Pfeifer MR, Woodford EC, et al. Assessment of Maternal and Neonatal Cord Blood SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies and Placental Transfer Ratios. JAMA Pediatr 2021;175:594-600.
53.Pantell RH, Roberts KB, Adams WG, Dreyer BP, Kuppermann N, O'Leary ST, et al. Evaluation and Management of Well-Appearing Febrile Infants 8 to 60 Days Old. Pediatrics. 2021 Aug;148(2):e2021052228.
54.Krober MS, Bass JW, Powell JM, Smith FR, Seto DS. Bacterial and viral pathogens causing fever in infants less than 3 months old. Am J Dis Child. 1985 Sep;139(9):889-92.
55.Rittichier KR, Bryan PA, Bassett KE, Taggart EW, Enriquez FR, Hillyard DR, et al. Diagnosis and outcomes of enterovirus infections in young infants. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2005 Jun;24(6):546-50.
56.Chuang YY, Huang YC. Enteroviral infection in neonates. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2019 Dec;52(6):851-857.
57.Lin TY, Kao HT, Hsieh SH, Huang YC, Chiu CH, Chou YH, et al. Neonatal enterovirus infections: emphasis on risk factors of severe and fatal infections. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2003 Oct;22(10):889-94.
58.Khetsuriani N, Lamonte A, Oberste MS, Pallansch M. Neonatal enterovirus infections reported to the national enterovirus surveillance system in the United States, 1983-2003. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2006 Oct;25(10):889-93.
59.Zhang M, Wang H, Tang J, He Y, Xiong T, Li W, et al. Clinical characteristics of severe neonatal enterovirus infection: a systematic review. BMC Pediatr. 2021 Mar 15;21(1):127.
60.Hu YL, Huang LM, Lu CY, Fang TY, Cheng AL, Chang LY. Manifestations of enterovirus D68 and high seroconversion among children attending a kindergarten. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2019 Dec;52(6):858-864.
61.Nix WA, Oberste MS, Pallansch MA. Sensitive, seminested PCR amplification of VP1 sequences for direct identification of all enterovirus serotypes from original clinical specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 2006 Aug;44(8):2698-704.
62.Kaida A, Iritani N, Yamamoto SP, Kanbayashi D, Hirai Y, Togawa M, et al. Distinct genetic clades of enterovirus D68 detected in 2010, 2013, and 2015 in Osaka City, Japan. PLoS One. 2017 Sep 13;12(9):e0184335.
63.Kawashima H, Kobayashi K, Aritaki K, Takami T, Ioi H, Kashiwagi Y, et al. Diagnosis and evaluation of febrile infants under 4 months of age in Japan by using RT-PCR for enterovirus. J Infect. 2006 Jul;53(1):16-20.
64.Kadambari S, Braccio S, Ribeiro S, Allen DJ, Pebody R, Brown D, et al. Enterovirus and parechovirus meningitis in infants younger than 90 days old in the UK and Republic of Ireland: a British Paediatric Surveillance Unit study. Arch Dis Child. 2019 Jun;104(6):552-557.
65.Ai J, Xie Z, Liu G, Chen Z, Yang Y, Li Y, et al. Etiology and prognosis of acute viral encephalitis and meningitis in Chinese children: a multicentre prospective study. BMC Infect Dis. 2017 Jul 14;17(1):494.
66.de Ceano-Vivas M, García ML, Velázquez A, Martín Del Valle F, Menasalvas A, Cilla A, et al. Neurodevelopmental Outcomes of Infants Younger Than 90 Days Old Following Enterovirus and Parechovirus Infections of the Central Nervous System. Front Pediatr. 2021 Sep 28;9:719119.
67.Yang X, Duan L, Zhan W, Tang Y, Liang L, Xie J, Luo M. Enterovirus B types cause severe infection in infants aged 0-3 months. Virol J. 2023 Jan 9;20(1):5.
68.Berardi A, Sandoni M, Toffoli C, Boncompagni A, Gennari W, Bergamini MB, et al. Clinical characterization of neonatal and pediatric enteroviral infections: an Italian single center study. Ital J Pediatr. 2019 Aug 2;45(1):94.
69.Verboon-Maciolek MA, Krediet TG, van Loon AM, Kaan J, Galama JM, Gerards LJ, et al. Epidemiological survey of neonatal non-polio enterovirus infection in the Netherlands. J Med Virol. 2002 Feb;66(2):241-5.
70.Abzug MJ. Presentation, diagnosis, and management of enterovirus infections in neonates. Paediatr Drugs. 2004;6(1):1-10.
71.Helfand RF, Khan AS, Pallansch MA, Alexander JP, Meyers HB, DeSantis RA, et al. Echovirus 30 infection and aseptic meningitis in parents of children attending a child care center. J Infect Dis. 1994 May;169(5):1133-7.
72.Mohle-Boetani JC, Matkin C, Pallansch M, Helfand R, Fenstersheib M, Blanding JA, et al. Viral meningitis in child care center staff and parents: an outbreak of echovirus 30 infections. Public Health Rep. 1999 May-Jun;114(3):249-56
-
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/89627-
dc.description.abstract研究背景 腸病毒為兒童常見感染疾病,其中腸病毒A71型、D68型、克沙奇病毒B型與伊科病毒是四種臨床上重要的非小兒麻痺腸病毒。1998年時臺灣曾發生腸病毒A71型大流行並且造成78位兒童死亡。疾病管制署因而設置許多疾病監測系統、建構腸病毒重症醫療網、推廣公共衛生教育以及制訂許多感染管制措施來防治腸病毒感染。這些疾病防治政策有效地使腸病毒A71型引起的重症與死亡人數從1998年開始到2020年之間顯著下降。在腸病毒A71型的疫情穩定控制之後,新的高風險型別包含D68型、克沙奇病毒B型與伊科病毒的威脅仍持續存在。新生兒與嬰兒感染腸病毒的臨床表現與常見感染型別與年齡較大的兒童並不相同。因此,本研究將探討新生兒臍帶血腸病毒血清流行病學研究以及嬰幼兒發燒與腸病毒感染的關聯性。

研究方法 我們自2021年01月至10月總共納入222位年齡20歲以上的產婦為受試者,接受問卷調查並且在生產時收集臍帶血進行伊科病毒11型、克沙奇病毒B3型與腸病毒D68型的中和抗體檢測。血清抗體效價≥ 1:8定義為血清抗體陽性。我們也針對2010年01月至2021年06月期間100天大嬰幼兒因發燒或腸病毒感染而至台大醫院小兒科住院的病人進行病歷回溯,蒐集人口學資料、臨床病程、檢驗結果與預後等數據。使用student t test與Mann–Whitney tests來分析連續變項。利用卡方檢定與Fisher's exact test來檢驗類別變項。多變項羅吉斯回歸分析將用於尋找與嚴重腸病毒感染有相關且具有獨立影響作用的危險因子,並計算(adjusted) odds ratio (aOR)值與95%信賴區間(95% confidence interval, 95% CI)。統計分析將使用SAS version 9.4進行,P-value小於0.05為統計顯著標準。

研究結果 新生兒臍帶血血清中和抗體研究結果顯示,伊科病毒11型、克沙奇病毒B3型與腸病毒D68型的血清陽性率分別為18% (41/222)、60% (134/232)及95% (211/222) (p<0.001). 伊科病毒11型、克沙奇病毒B3型與腸病毒D68型的幾何平均抗體效價分別為 3.3 (95% CI 2.9-3.8)、15.9 (95% 12.5-20.3) 與109.9 (95% CI 92.4-131.6)。問卷分析顯示,雖然高達98.6%的產婦了解預防腸病毒感染的措施,但在日常生活中僅73.4%會落實正確的洗手方式。病歷回溯分析在875位小嬰兒發燒的病人中,17.1%(150/875)經喉頭拭子、肛門拭子或腦脊髓液病毒培養或PCR檢驗證實有腸病毒感染。腸病毒病患有顯著較高的紅疹(p<0.001)、口腔潰瘍(p<0.001)與接觸史或群聚史(p<0.001)。實驗室檢驗部分,腸病毒病患有顯著較高的淋巴球比例(p=0.03),腦脊髓中白血球(p<0.001)與淋巴球數(p<0.001)數也顯著較高。共有162位100天大以內的小嬰兒腸病毒感染者,感染年齡中位數為49.5天大,男嬰佔58.6%(n=95),早產兒佔9.9%(n=16)。常見的臨床表現為發燒 (n=146,90%)、上呼吸道感染 (n=112, 69%)、中樞神經系統受侵犯 (n=69,43%)、皮疹(n=32,20%)與口腔潰瘍(n=25,15.4%)。針對所有腸病毒感染進行型別分析,NPEV是最常見的型別(n=52,32%),其次為coxsackievirus B5 (CVB5,n=29,18%),第三為echovirus 11(E11,n=18,11%)。侵犯中樞神經系統的腸病毒則以CVB5 (n=18,26%)、NPEV (n=16,23%)與E11 (n=11,7%)佔主要型別。多變項逐步羅吉斯迴歸分析顯示,年紀20天大以下嬰兒 (adjusted OR=10.8, 95% CI 1.6-203.2, p value=0.018)、血色素小於9 gm/dl (adjusted OR=21.1, 95% CI 2.5-179, p value=0.005)以及感染高風險型別 (adjusted OR=10.7, 95% CI 1.05-109.9, p value=0.045)為嬰幼兒感染腸病毒產生重症的主要風險因子。

結論 經胎盤所獲得的母源抗體是新生兒對抗腸病毒感染的重要免疫來源,臍帶血中伊科病毒11型的血清抗體陽性率與幾何平均效價皆顯著低於克沙奇病毒B3型與腸病毒D68型,顯示當面臨伊科病毒11型流行時,大多數新生兒是缺乏免疫力的且可能因而產生重症甚至死亡。在100天大以下的小嬰兒發燒中,腸病毒感染佔了病原的17.1%。43%小嬰兒感染腸病毒會侵犯中樞神經系統,且以非小兒麻痺腸病毒、克沙奇病毒B5型與伊科病毒11型為最常見的影響型別。未來我們仍須持續監測新生兒與小嬰兒腸病毒感染的流行病學。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractBackground Enterovirus infection is a common pediatric infectious disease. Enterovirus A71(EV A71), enterovirus D68 (EVD68), coxsackievirus B and echovirus are the four clinically important non-polio enterovirus. There was an EV A71 large outbreak which led to 78 children death in Taiwan in 1998. Therefore, Taiwan Centers of Disease Control set up multiple disease surveillance system, medical network of severe enterovirus infection, public health education and implemented several infection control policies to prevent enterovirus infection. These disease preventive measures control EV A71 effectively and the number of severe infection and mortality decreased significantly from 1998 to 2020. The epidemic of EV A71 was under control. However, new high risk serotypes including EVD68, coxsackievirus B and echovirus persisted and posed a threat to children health. Neonates and infants have different clinical manifestations and common serotypes of enterovirus from older children. The aim of this study is to evaluate the seroepidemiology of enterovirus in cord blood and the relationship of young infant with fever and enterovirus infection.

Materials and Methods We enrolled 222 parturient women equal to or above 20 years of age between January and October 2021. All participants underwent questionnaire investigation and we collected the cord blood to measure the neutralization antibodies against echovirus 11(E11), coxsackievirus B3 (CVB3) and EVD68. Seropositivity was defined as a serotiter ≥ 1:8. We also conducted retrospective chart review study to include infants younger than 100 days old who was admitted to National Taiwan University due to fever or enterovirus infection during January 2010 and June 2021. Demographic data, clinical course, laboratory examination and prognosis were collected and analyzed. We used student t tests and Mann–Whitney tests to examine continuous variables and analysed categorical variables by the chi-square test and Fisher’s exact test. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to examine the independent risk factors of severe enterovirus infection. (Adjusted) odds ratio with 95% confidence interval would also be calculated. Statistical analysis would be performed by SAS version 9.4 and P-value<0.05 was considered statistical significant.

Results The seropositive rates of cord blood were 18% (41/222), 60% (134/232) and 95% (211/222) for E11, CVB3 and EVD68, respectively (p<0.001). Geometric mean titers were 3.3 (95% CI 2.9-3.8) of E11, 15.9 (95% 12.5-20.3) of CVB3 and 109.9 (95% CI 92.4-131.6) of EVD68. Questionnaire analysis showed that although 98.6% parturient women understand the way of protection from enterovirus infection, only 73.4% would follow up the correct steps of hand washing in their daily life. Retrospective chart review enrolled 875 young infants with fever and 17.1% (150/875) were proved to have enterovirus infection via throat swab, rectal swab or cerebrospinal fluid viral isolation or PCR. Patients with enterovirus infection had significantly higher rates of skin rash(p<0.001), oral ulcer (p<0.001), and contact or cluster history (p<0.001). Lab examination showed significantly higher lymphocyte percentage (p=0.03), leukocyte(p<0.001) and lymphocyte (p<0.001) counts in the cerebrospinal fluid. 162 infants younger than 100-day old had enterovirus infection and the median age was 49.5 days old. Boys accounted for 58.6% (n=95) and prematurity accounted for 9.9% (n=16). The common symptoms of infants with enterovirus infection included fever (n=146,90%), upper respiratory tract infection (n=112,69%), central nervous system involvement (n=68,43%), skin rash (n=32,20%) and oral ulcer (n=25,15.4%). To evaluate the serotype distribution, non-polio enterovirus accounted for 32% (n=52), followed by coxsackievirus B5(n=29,18%) and E11 (n=18,11%). Coxsackievirus B5 (N=18,26%), non-polio enterovirus (n=16,23%) and E11 (n=11,7%) were the top three serotypes leading to central nervous system involvement. Multivariable logistic stepwise selection regression analysis showed that age under 20 days (adjusted OR=10.8, 95% CI 1.9-60.8, p value<0.001), hemoglobin less than 9gm/dl (adjusted OR=21.1, 95% CI 2.5-179, p value=0.005) and high risk serotypes (adjusted OR=10.7, 95% CI 1.05-109.9, p value=0.045) were the major risk factors of severe enterovirus infection.

Conclusion Transplacentally-acquired maternal antibody is an important immunity against enterovirus infection in neonates. Cord blood seropositive rate and geometric mean titer of E11 were significantly lower than CVB3 and EVD68. A large proportion of newborns are susceptible to E11 and might developed severe infection or even death when facing E11 epidemic. Enterovirus accounted 17.1% of the etiology young infant (<100 days old ) with fever. 43% young infant would have central nervous system involvement when having enterovirus infection. The common serotypes were non-polio enterovirus, coxsackievirus B5 and E11. It is imminent to monitor the epidemiology of neonates and young infants with enterovirus infections.
en
dc.description.provenanceSubmitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2023-09-13T16:08:12Z
No. of bitstreams: 0
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2023-09-13T16:08:12Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0en
dc.description.tableofcontents口試委員會審定書 1
謝辭 3
中文摘要 4
英文摘要 6
目錄 9
圖目錄 10
表目錄 11
第一章 腸病毒A71型於臺灣的流行趨勢變化 12
第一節 腸病毒A71型的重要性12
第二節 研究方法 12
第三節 臺灣腸病毒感染自1998年至2020年的趨勢變化 15
第四節 討論 17
第二章 新生兒臍帶血腸病毒血清流行病學 20
第一節 新生兒腸病毒感染 20
第二節 研究方法 21
第三節 研究結果 22
第四節 討論 23
第三章 嬰幼兒發燒與腸病毒感染之關聯 26
第一節 研究背景 26                  
第二節 研究方法 27
第三節 研究結果 28
第四節 討論 30
第四章 結論 33                          
參考文獻 34
-
dc.language.isozh_TW-
dc.title兒童腸病毒感染:從腸病毒A71型到新生兒臍帶血血清流行病學研究zh_TW
dc.titlePediatric Enterovirus Infection: From Enterovirus A71 to Neonate Cord Blood Seroepidemiological Studyen
dc.typeThesis-
dc.date.schoolyear111-2-
dc.description.degree碩士-
dc.contributor.coadvisor張鑾英zh_TW
dc.contributor.coadvisorLuan-Yin Changen
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee呂俊毅;施惟量zh_TW
dc.contributor.oralexamcommitteeChun-Yi Lu;Wei-Liang Shihen
dc.subject.keyword腸病毒,臍帶血,嬰兒,腸病毒A71型,腸病毒D68型,克沙奇病毒B型,伊科病毒11型,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordEnterovirus,Cord blood,Infant,Enterovirus A71,Enterovirus D68,Coxsackievirus B,Echovirus 11,en
dc.relation.page53-
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU202301578-
dc.rights.note同意授權(限校園內公開)-
dc.date.accepted2023-07-15-
dc.contributor.author-college公共衛生學院-
dc.contributor.author-dept流行病學與預防醫學研究所-
顯示於系所單位:流行病學與預防醫學研究所

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-111-2.pdf
授權僅限NTU校內IP使用(校園外請利用VPN校外連線服務)
1.53 MBAdobe PDF檢視/開啟
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved