請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/89518
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 葉明叡 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.advisor | Ming-Jui Yeh | en |
dc.contributor.author | 孫伃君 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author | Yu-Chun Sun | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-09-08T16:08:24Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-11-09 | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2023-09-08 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2023 | - |
dc.date.submitted | 2023-07-18 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | 中華民國內政部戶政司(2018)。老年人口突破14% 內政部:臺灣正式邁入高齡社會。中華民國內政部。https://www.moi.gov.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=2&s=11663 。引用時間:2023年1月20日。
中華民國老人福利推動聯盟(2022)。老人保護工作指引手冊。衛生福利部。https://www.mohw.gov.tw/dl-81372-23f1441a-9682-494a-bc80-aab565ac86a5.html 。引用時間:2023年3月4日。 全國法規資料庫(2020)。老人福利法。全國法規資料庫。https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=D0050037 。引用時間:2023年1月23日。 李瑞金(2000)。我國老人保護服務之評估。社區發展季刊,92,84-98。 李瑞金(2015)。老人保護服務現況與策略。長期照護雜誌,19(3),237-249。 林玫君、劉立凡、李懿珍(2016)。高齡化社會孤獨死之預防與因應。社區發展季刊,153,393-408。 林讌如(2019)。長輩受虐原因多,防治策略需有智慧。衛生福利部季刊,(2)14-17。 高淑清(2001)。在美華人留學生太太的生活世界--詮釋與反思。本土心理學研究,16,225-285。 國家發展委員會(2022)。高齡化時程。國家發展委員會。https://www.ndc.gov.tw/Content_List.aspx?n=D527207EEEF59B9B 。引用時間:2023年1月20日。 張宏哲、樂冠妤(2019)。107年度「老人受暴情形調查研究計畫」。衛生福利部保戶服務司。 張淑卿(2018)。社區照顧關懷據點轉型設置巷弄長期照顧站之探討。立法院。https://www.ly.gov.tw/Pages/Detail.aspx?nodeid=6590&pid=179383 。引用時間:2023年1月25日。 陳伊如,邱怡玟,龍紀萱(2019)。老年歧視概念分析。台灣衛誌,38,470-477。 陳嘉桓(2019)。村(里)長與村(里)幹事對社區老人虐待案件通報行為意向之 研究-以桃園市為例。國立暨南國際大學。 黃志忠(2008)。淺談老人虐待社區處遇模式之建構。國立暨南大學(97年度)各系特色研究方案:建構「臺灣家庭暴力防治政策與實務模式」整合性研究—子計畫。 黃志忠(2013)。老人主要照顧者施虐傾向及其危險因子之研究—以中部地區居家服務老人爲例。中華心理衛生學刊,26(1),95-139。 黃志忠(2015)。以長期照顧服務作為老人虐待防治機制與資源之研究。2015兩岸社會福利論壇,107-122。 詹火生(2011)。一甲子以來台灣社會福利政策的演變:從理念政策到制度實踐。財團法人中華文化社會福利事業基金會。 臺北市政府民政局(2022)。111年1-12月各區按年齡人口數。臺北市政府民政局。https://ca.gov.taipei/News_Content.aspx?n=8693DC9620A1AABF&sms=D19E9582624D83CB&s=E70E0ADF8510073C 引用時間:2023年2月19日。 劉家勇(2019)。從強化社會安全網計畫看我國老人保護工作的機會與挑戰。社區發展季刊,181-197。 劉家勇、施秋蘭(2018)。長期照護構護理人員對老人保護工作認知之研究:以身體約束為例。台灣醫學人文學刊,19(1&2),69-79。 蔡啟源(2005)。老人虐待與老人保護工作。社區發展季刊,108,185-197。 蕭金源(2009)。老人長照制度問題分析與政策規劃之建議。社區發展季刊,128,324-341。 謝美香(2006年1月15日)。由家庭生態系統理論探討家庭壓力管理。南華大學社會學研究所。https://www.nhu.edu.tw/~society/e-j/52/52-47.htm 。引用時間:2023年3月15日。 Beauchamp, Tom L. (1979). Principles of biomedical ethics. New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by James F. Childress. Bratt, C., Abrams, D., Swift, H. J., Vauclair, C. M., & Marques, S. (2018). Perceived age discrimination across age in Europe: From an ageing society to a society for all ages. Developmental psychology, 54(1), 167–180. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1977). Toward an experimental ecology of human development. American Psychologist, 32, 513–531. Butler R. N. (1969). Age-ism: Another form of bigotry. The Gerontologist, 9, 243–246. Chun-Ying Cho PhD. (2015). Silent Victims: A Brief Report on Abused Older Women in Taiwan. Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect, 27:4-5, 514-526. De Jong Gierveld J, Fokkema C, Van Tilburg T. (2011). Alleviating loneliness among older adults: possibilities and constraints of interventions. In: Safeguarding the convoy: a call to action from the campaign to end loneliness. London: Age UK, 41–5 Derek Miedema. (2014). Growing old alone: The rise of social isolation as Canada ages. Institue of Marriage and Family Canada. http://www.imfcanada.org/sites/default/files/Growing_Old_Alone_April_2014.pdf Retrieved February 9, 2023. Domènech-Abella, J., Mundó, J., Leonardi, M., Chatterji, S., Tobiasz-Adamczyk, B., Koskinen, S., Ayuso-Mateos, J. L., Haro, J. M., & Olaya, B.(2020). Loneliness and depression among older European adults: The role of perceived neighborhood-built environment. Health & Place, 62, 102280. Fakoya OA, McCorry NK, Donnelly M. (2020). Loneliness and social isolation interventions for older adults: a scoping review of reviews. BMC Public Health, 20, 129. Gardiner C, Geldenhuys G, Gott M. (2018). Interventions to reduce social isolation and loneliness among older people: an integrative review. Health Soc Care Community, 26:147–57. Geneva: International Telecommunication Union. (2021). Ageing in a digital world – from vulnerable to valuable. https://www.itu.int/myitu/-/media/Publications/2021-Publications/Ageing-in-a-digital-world--from- vulnerable-to-valuable.pdf Retrieved February 17, 2023. Holt-Lunstadt, J., Smith, T.B., and Layton, B.L. (2010). Social relationships and mortality risk: A meta-analytic review. PLoS Medicine, 12. Huang, C. (2013). Potentially harmful caregiver behavior: A case study of in-home care of elderly from central Taiwan. Formosa Journal of Mental Health, 26, 95–139. Jackson, S. L., & Hafemeister, T. L. (2011). Risk factors associated with elder abuse: The importance of differentiating by type of elder maltreatment. Violence and Victims, 26, 738 – 757. Jian, Y. (2009). Community counseling pattern within the family of the elderly abuse. Counseling & Guidance, 281, 24–27. Jopling K. (2020). Promising approaches revisited: effective action on loneliness in later life. London: Campaign to End Loneliness; (https://www.campaigntoendloneliness.org/wp-content/uploads/Promising_ Approaches_Revisited_FULL_REPORT.pdf ). Retrieved February 17, 2023. Liao, W., & Cai, M. (2006). Elder abuse. Basic Medicine, 21, 183–186. Lin, W., & Huang, C. (2010). Study about knowledge, attitude, and willingness to deal with elder abuse: Medical professionals and social workers in Taipei City and new Taipei City as an example. National Seminar on the Elderly Protection, Taipei, Taiwan. Wang, Ming Sheng., Kang, Sung-Wan & Lawrence B. Schiamberg. (2015). Ecological factors associated with elder abuse in Taiwan: a systematic review. Asia Pacific Journal of Social Work and Development, 25:1, 13-28. National Senior Strategy (2018). Make Addressing Ageism, Elder Abuse and Social Isolation a National Priority. Government of Canada. Nicholson, N.R. (2012). A Review of Social Isolation: An Important but Underassessed Condition in Older Adults. Journal of Primary Prevention, 33(2-3), 137-152. Steptoe, A., Shankar, A., Demakakos, P., and Wardle, J. (2013). Social isolation, loneliness, and all-cause mortality in older men and women. PNAS, 110:15, 5797–5801. Sung, K. (2005). Care and respect for the elderly in Korea: Filial piety in modern times in East Asia. Gyeonggi-do. Republic of Korea: Jimoondang. Wang, J. (2005). Psychological abuse behavior exhibited by caregivers in the care of the elderly and correlated factors in long-term care facilities in Taiwan. Journal of Nursing Research, 13, 271–280. Wang, J. (2006). Psychological abuse and its characteristic correlates among elderly Taiwanese. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 42, 307–318. Washington DC: The National Academies Press (2020). Social isolation and loneliness in older adults: opportunities for the health care system. World Health Organization (2015). World Report On Ageing And Health. Chapter 3 Health in older age, 74-75. World Health Organization. (2021). Social isolation and loneliness among older people: Advocacy brief. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240030749 Retrieved January 16, 2023. | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/89518 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 背景與目的:隨著老年人口的上升,相關議題與需求也日益被重視。其中,老人虐待是一個棘手的問題。造成老人虐待的原因很多,「社會孤立」是其中一個重要的危險因子。社會孤立程度越高的老人,遭受虐待的風險及嚴重程度越高。近年來,台灣政府推動「在地老化」等政策,而「社區照顧關懷據點」也就此成立。「社區參與」與「在地初級預防服務」為社區照顧關懷據點設立之兩大重點,而社區參與提升有助於降低社會孤立的程度。因此,本研究目的在於了解社區照顧關懷據點於老人虐待事件所扮演的角色。其中包含了解社區照顧關懷據點於老人虐待事件相關業務執行的現況為何;社區照顧關懷據點的設立是否有助於老人的社區參與和提供在地初級預防,進而減少了老人虐待事件的發生或降低其嚴重性。
研究方法:本研究採質性訪談設計,以立意抽樣方法來選取進行半結構式訪談之對象。訪談對象主要為於社區照顧關懷據點之工作人員並為法律規定若知悉老人虐待事件,具有通報義務者,包含里長、里幹事、社工人員。共招募24人,訪談內容包含目前社區照顧關懷據點執行與老人虐待相關之業務;處理、通報老人虐待案件之經驗;影響通報的因素;社區照顧關懷據點設立前、後之業務執行狀況;對有關社區照顧關懷據點政策的建議。 研究結果:本研究發現,多數受訪者無處理老人虐待案件之經驗,而受虐老人本身的最大利益為影響受訪者向上通報之主要考量因素。此外,受訪者認為社區照顧關懷據點之成立確實能增加老人之社會連結,不過相關配套措施,例如,經費核銷及品質把關,仍有改善空間。以先階段來說,社區照顧關懷據點於老人虐待事件扮演著間接預防之角色。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Background and Objectives: Issues related to the elderly are getting emphasized due to the increasing elder population. Among these, elder abuse has been a tricky one. Many things can cause elder abuse. According to existing studies, “social isolation” is a risk factor of elder abuse. People who are under higher degree of social isolation leads to a higher risk of suffering from elder abuse. In recent years, the Taiwan government has pursued the ideal of “aging in place” leading to a series of policy including the establishment of “community care centers.” Community participation and primary prevention care in place are the two main strategies of this policy. Therefore, this study aims to (1) understand the current situation of how the community care centers practice the affairs related to elder abuse, (2) explore how the establishment of community care centers improved the elders’ community participation and provided primary prevention care in place, and (3) if it decreased the incidences and severity of elder abuse.
Methods: This is a qualitative research with semi-structured interviews. Purposeful sampling will be used to select 24 participants. Participants will be workers at community centers who are mandated reporters, such as village chiefs, village clerks, and social workers. The contents of the interview include the current situation of how the community care centers practice the affairs related to elder abuse; experiences of dealing and reporting incidents of elder abuse; factors affecting reporting; the comparison of how the community care centers practice the affairs related to elder abuse before and after the establishment of community care centers; suggestion for the policy. Results: Most of the interviewees don’t have experiences in dealing with incidents of elder abuse, and what affects them reporting the incidents is victims’ interests. Furthermore, interviewees think the establishment of community care centers can increase elders’ social connection. However, the government still need to find some schemes to support its running, such as the rembursement system and quality control. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2023-09-08T16:08:24Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2023-09-08T16:08:24Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 摘要 I
ABSTRACT II 第一章 緒論 5 一、 研究背景 5 二、 研究動機 7 三、 研究問題與目的 9 第二章 文獻探討 10 一、 台灣老人虐待概念發展 10 二、 受虐老人的特徵 11 三、 台灣老人虐待的生態性因素 13 四、 社會孤立與老人虐待 16 五、 降低社會孤立之措施 17 六、 老人保護工作 20 第三章 研究方法 23 一、 研究理論架構 23 二、 研究設計 23 三、 研究材料 25 四、 資料分析 26 五、 研究倫理考量 27 第四章 研究結果 28 一、 訪談概況 28 二、 社區照顧關懷據點運作現況 31 三、 受訪者相關經驗 33 四、 未處理過老人虐待的原因 43 五、 影響通報因素 45 六、 受訪者對社區照顧關懷據點之看法與建議 48 第五章 結論與建議 53 一、 結果討論 53 二、 政策建議 56 三、 研究限制 58 參考文獻 60 附錄一 訪談大綱 66 | - |
dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
dc.title | 社區照顧關懷據點於老人虐待事件所扮演之角色 | zh_TW |
dc.title | The Role of Community Care Centers in Incidents of Elder Abuse | en |
dc.type | Thesis | - |
dc.date.schoolyear | 111-2 | - |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 官晨怡;白裕彬 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Chen-I Kuan;Yuh-Bin Bai | en |
dc.subject.keyword | 老人虐待,社會孤立,社區照顧關懷據點, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Elder Abuse,Social Isolation,Community Care Center, | en |
dc.relation.page | 67 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202301573 | - |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(限校園內公開) | - |
dc.date.accepted | 2023-07-18 | - |
dc.contributor.author-college | 公共衛生學院 | - |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 健康政策與管理研究所 | - |
顯示於系所單位: | 健康政策與管理研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-111-2.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.38 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。