請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/89465完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 荷世平 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Shih-Ping Ho | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 游承羲 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Cheng-Hsi Yu | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-09-07T17:07:50Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-07-28 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2023-09-11 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2023 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2023-08-01 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Adamkiewicz, J., Kochanska, E., Adamkiewicz, I., & Łukasik, R. M. (2022). Greenwashing and sustainable fashion industry. Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry, 100710.
Aguilera, R. V., Rupp, D. E., Williams, C. A., & Ganapathi, J. (2007). Putting the S back in corporate social responsibility: A multilevel theory of social change in organizations. Academy of management review, 32(3), 836-863. Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2012). What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility: A review and research agenda. Journal of management, 38(4), 932-968. ASIC. (2022a). INFRINGEMENT NOTICE. Retrieved from https://download.asic.gov.au/media/ke1fhxlw/infringement-notice-tlou-energy-ltd-s02563040-20221018.pdf ASIC. (2022b). Vanguard Investments Australia Ltd. Retrieved from https://download.asic.gov.au/media/4hzfxcgd/infringement-notice-vanguard-s02553190.pdf Australian Securities & Investments Commission. Retrieved from https://asic.gov.au/ Bansal, P., & Clelland, I. (2004). Talking trash: Legitimacy, impression management, and unsystematic risk in the context of the natural environment. Academy of Management journal, 47(1), 93-103. Bansal, P., & Song, H.-C. (2017). Similar but not the same: Differentiating corporate sustainability from corporate responsibility. Academy of Management Annals, 11(1), 105-149. Barney, J. B., & Hansen, M. H. (1994). Trustworthiness as a source of competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 15(S1), 175-190. Bazillier, R., Hatte, S., & Vauday, J. (2013). Environmental Responsibility and FDI: Do Firms Relocate Their Irresponsibilities Abroad? Berg, F., Koelbel, J. F., & Rigobon, R. (2022). Aggregate confusion: The divergence of ESG ratings. Review of Finance, 26(6), 1315-1344. Berrone, P., Fosfuri, A., Gelabert, L., & Gomez‐Mejia, L. R. (2013). Necessity as the mother of ‘green’inventions: Institutional pressures and environmental innovations. Strategic Management Journal, 34(8), 891-909. Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2004). Doing better at doing good: When, why, and how consumers respond to corporate social initiatives. California management review, 47(1), 9-24. Bhattacharya, C. B., Sen, S., & Korschun, D. (2008). Using corporate social responsibility to win the war for talent. MIT Sloan management review, 49(2). Brammer, S., Hoejmose, S., & Marchant, K. (2012). Environmental management in SME s in the UK: Practices, pressures and perceived benefits. Business strategy and the environment, 21(7), 423-434. Brammer, S., Jackson, G., & Matten, D. (2012). Corporate social responsibility and institutional theory: New perspectives on private governance. Socio-economic review, 10(1), 3-28. Brammer, S., & Pavelin, S. (2006). Voluntary environmental disclosures by large UK companies. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 33(7‐8), 1168-1188. Brammer, S. J., & Pavelin, S. (2006). Corporate reputation and social performance: The importance of fit. Journal of management studies, 43(3), 435-455. Bulut, C., Nazli, M., Aydin, E., & Haque, A. U. (2021). The effect of environmental concern on conscious green consumption of post-millennials: The moderating role of greenwashing perceptions. Young Consumers, 22(2), 306-319. Campbell, J. L. (2007). Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of management review, 32(3), 946-967. Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business horizons, 34(4), 39-48. Carroll, A. B., & Shabana, K. M. (2010). The business case for corporate social responsibility: A review of concepts, research and practice. International journal of management reviews, 12(1), 85-105. Chatterji, A. K., Durand, R., Levine, D. I., & Touboul, S. (2016). Do ratings of firms converge? Implications for managers, investors and strategy researchers. Strategic Management Journal, 37(8), 1597-1614. Chen, Y.-S., & Chang, C.-H. (2013). Greenwash and green trust: The mediation effects of green consumer confusion and green perceived risk. Journal of business ethics, 114, 489-500. Chen, Y., Wang, G., He, Y., & Zhang, H. (2022). Greenwashing behaviors in construction projects: there is an elephant in the room! Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(43), 64597-64621. Clark, G. L., Feiner, A., & Viehs, M. (2015). From the stockholder to the stakeholder: How sustainability can drive financial outperformance. Available at SSRN 2508281. Connelly, B. L., Certo, S. T., Ireland, R. D., & Reutzel, C. R. (2011). Signaling theory: A review and assessment. Journal of management, 37(1), 39-67. Darnall, N., Potoski, M., & Prakash, A. (2010). Sponsorship matters: Assessing business participation in government-and industry-sponsored voluntary environmental programs. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(2), 283-307. de Freitas Netto, S. V., Sobral, M. F. F., Ribeiro, A. R. B., & Soares, G. R. d. L. (2020). Concepts and forms of greenwashing: A systematic review. Environmental Sciences Europe, 32(1), 1-12. Deckop, J. R., Merriman, K. K., & Gupta, S. (2006). The effects of CEO pay structure on corporate social performance. Journal of management, 32(3), 329-342. Delmas, M., & Toffel, M. W. (2004). Stakeholders and environmental management practices: an institutional framework. Business strategy and the environment, 13(4), 209-222. Delmas, M. A., & Burbano, V. C. (2011). The drivers of greenwashing. California management review, 54(1), 64-87. Dhaliwal, D. S., Li, O. Z., Tsang, A., & Yang, Y. G. (2011). Voluntary nonfinancial disclosure and the cost of equity capital: The initiation of corporate social responsibility reporting. The accounting review, 86(1), 59-100. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American sociological review, 147-160. Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of management review, 20(1), 65-91. Drempetic, S., Klein, C., & Zwergel, B. (2020). The influence of firm size on the ESG score: Corporate sustainability ratings under review. Journal of business ethics, 167, 333-360. Dyllick, T., & Hockerts, K. (2002). Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability. Business strategy and the environment, 11(2), 130-141. Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Management science, 60(11), 2835-2857. Eccles, R. G., & Krzus, M. P. (2010). One report: Integrated reporting for a sustainable strategy: John Wiley & Sons. Eccles, R. G., & Serafeim, G. (2013). The performance frontier. Harvard business review, 91(5), 50-60. Eccles, R. G., Serafeim, G., Seth, D., & Ming, C. C. Y. (2013). The Performance Frontier: Innovating for a Sustainable Strategy: Interaction. Harvard business review, 91(7), 17-18. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of management review, 14(1), 57-74. Elkington, J. (1997). The triple bottom line. Environmental management: Readings and cases, 2, 49-66. Energy, T. (2021a). Annual Report to Shareholders. Retrieved from https://cdn-api.markitdigital.com/apiman-gateway/ASX/asx-research/1.0/file/2924-02423796-2A1324601?access_token=83ff96335c2d45a094df02a206a39ff4 Energy, T. (2021b). Cleaner Energy Presentation. Retrieved from https://cdn-api.markitdigital.com/apiman-gateway/ASX/asx-research/1.0/file/2924-02438288-2A1332233?access_token=83ff96335c2d45a094df02a206a39ff4 Energy, T. (2021c). Quarterly Activities Report Retrieved from https://cdn-api.markitdigital.com/apiman-gateway/ASX/asx-research/1.0/file/2924-02401295-2A1312679?access_token=83ff96335c2d45a094df02a206a39ff4 Energy, T. (2021d). Tlou seeking Carbon Neutrality. Retrieved from https://cdn-api.markitdigital.com/apiman-gateway/ASX/asx-research/1.0/file/2924-02341758-2A1280655?access_token=83ff96335c2d45a094df02a206a39ff4 Energy, T. (2022a). ASIC Investigation. Retrieved from Energy, T. (2022b). ASIC Investigation Concluded. Retrieved from Etter, M., Ravasi, D., & Colleoni, E. (2019). Social media and the formation of organizational reputation. Academy of management review, 44(1), 28-52. Federal Trade Commission. Retrieved from https://www.ftc.gov/ Fernandez-Feijoo, B., Romero, S., & Ruiz, S. (2014a). Commitment to corporate social responsibility measured through global reporting initiative reporting: Factors affecting the behavior of companies. Journal of cleaner production, 81, 244-254. Fernandez-Feijoo, B., Romero, S., & Ruiz, S. (2014b). Effect of stakeholders’ pressure on transparency of sustainability reports within the GRI framework. Journal of business ethics, 122, 53-63. Flammer, C. (2015). Does corporate social responsibility lead to superior financial performance? A regression discontinuity approach. Management science, 61(11), 2549-2568. Freeman, R. B., & Medoff, J. L. (1984). What do unions do. Indus. & Lab. Rel. Rev., 38, 244. Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. (2015). ESG and financial performance: aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journal of sustainable finance & investment, 5(4), 210-233. FTC. (2022a). KOHL’S INC. F/K/A KOHL’S DEPARTMENT STORES, INC., Complaint. Retrieved from https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/2023171KohlsComplaint.pdf FTC. (2022b). KOHL’S INC. F/K/A KOHL’S DEPARTMENT STORES, INC., Order. Retrieved from https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/2023171KohlsOrder.pdf FTC. (2022c). WALMART INC., Complaint. Retrieved from https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/2023173WalmartComplaint.pdf FTC. (2022d). WALMART INC., Order. Retrieved from https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/2023173WalmartOrder.pdf Gamerschlag, R., Möller, K., & Verbeeten, F. (2011). Determinants of voluntary CSR disclosure: empirical evidence from Germany. Review of managerial science, 5, 233-262. Garcia, A. S., Mendes-Da-Silva, W., & Orsato, R. J. (2017). Sensitive industries produce better ESG performance: Evidence from emerging markets. Journal of cleaner production, 150, 135-147. Garcia, A. S., Mendes-Da-Silva, W., & Orsato, R. J. (2019). Corporate sustainability, capital markets, and ESG performance. Individual behaviors and technologies for financial innovations, 287-309. Garrido, D., Espínola‐Arredondo, A., & Munoz‐Garcia, F. (2020). Can mandatory certification promote greenwashing? A signaling approach. Journal of public economic theory, 22(6), 1801-1851. Giese, G., Nagy, Z., & Lee, L.-E. (2021). Deconstructing ESG ratings performance: Risk and return for E, S, and G by time horizon, sector, and weighting. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 47(3), 94-111. Guo, X., Xiao, G., & Zhang, F. (2017). Effect of consumer awareness on corporate social responsibility under asymmetric information. Available at SSRN 3039862. Hahn, R., & Kühnen, M. (2013). Determinants of sustainability reporting: A review of results, trends, theory, and opportunities in an expanding field of research. Journal of cleaner production, 59, 5-21. Hahn, R., Reimsbach, D., & Schiemann, F. (2015). Organizations, climate change, and transparency: Reviewing the literature on carbon disclosure. Organization & Environment, 28(1), 80-102. Hahn, T., & Pinkse, J. (2014). Private environmental governance through cross-sector partnerships: Tensions between competition and effectiveness. Organization & Environment, 27(2), 140-160. Hahn, T., Preuss, L., Pinkse, J., & Figge, F. (2014). Cognitive frames in corporate sustainability: Managerial sensemaking with paradoxical and business case frames. Academy of management review, 39(4), 463-487. He, Q., Wang, Z., Wang, G., Xie, J., & Chen, Z. (2022). The dark side of environmental sustainability in projects: Unraveling greenwashing behaviors. Project Management Journal, 53(4), 349-366. Hillman, A. J., & Keim, G. D. (2001). Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: what's the bottom line? Strategic Management Journal, 22(2), 125-139. Hoepner, A. G., Oikonomou, I., Sautner, Z., Starks, L. T., & Zhou, X. (2018). ESG shareholder engagement and downside risk. Jensen, D. H. (2006). Responsive labor: A theology of work: Presbyterian Publishing Corp. Kramer, M. R., & Porter, M. (2011). Creating shared value (Vol. 17): FSG Boston, MA, USA. Laroche, M., Bergeron, J., & Barbaro‐Forleo, G. (2001). Targeting consumers who are willing to pay more for environmentally friendly products. Journal of consumer marketing, 18(6), 503-520. Lee, D. D., & Faff, R. W. (2009). Corporate sustainability performance and idiosyncratic risk: A global perspective. Financial Review, 44(2), 213-237. Li, H., Zhang, X., & Zhao, Y. (2022). ESG and firm's default risk. Finance Research Letters, 47, 102713. Luo, X., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2006). Corporate social responsibility, customer satisfaction, and market value. Journal of marketing, 70(4), 1-18. Lyon, T. P., & Maxwell, J. W. (2011). Greenwash: Corporate environmental disclosure under threat of audit. Journal of economics & management strategy, 20(1), 3-41. Lyon, T. P., & Montgomery, A. W. (2015). The means and end of greenwash. Organization & Environment, 28(2), 223-249. Mahoney, L. S., Thorne, L., Cecil, L., & LaGore, W. (2013). A research note on standalone corporate social responsibility reports: Signaling or greenwashing? Critical perspectives on Accounting, 24(4-5), 350-359. Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. (2003). Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative science quarterly, 48(2), 268-305. Market announcements - TOU. Retrieved from https://www2.asx.com.au/markets/trade-our-cash-market/announcements.tou Marquis, C., Toffel, M. W., & Zhou, Y. (2016). Scrutiny, norms, and selective disclosure: A global study of greenwashing. Organization Science, 27(2), 483-504. Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). “Implicit” and “explicit” CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of management review, 33(2), 404-424. McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of management review, 26(1), 117-127. Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American journal of sociology, 83(2), 340-363. Mishina, Y., Dykes, B. J., Block, E. S., & Pollock, T. G. (2010). Why “good” firms do bad things: The effects of high aspirations, high expectations, and prominence on the incidence of corporate illegality. Academy of Management journal, 53(4), 701-722. Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of management review, 22(4), 853-886. Morsing, M., & Schultz, M. (2006). Corporate social responsibility communication: stakeholder information, response and involvement strategies. Business ethics: A European review, 15(4), 323-338. Nyilasy, G., Gangadharbatla, H., & Paladino, A. (2014). Perceived greenwashing: The interactive effects of green advertising and corporate environmental performance on consumer reactions. Journal of business ethics, 125, 693-707. Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of management review, 16(1), 145-179. Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization studies, 24(3), 403-441. Parguel, B., Benoît-Moreau, F., & Larceneux, F. (2011). How sustainability ratings might deter ‘greenwashing’: A closer look at ethical corporate communication. Journal of business ethics, 102, 15-28. Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard business review, 84(12), 78-92. Qayyum, A., Jamil, R. A., & Sehar, A. (2022). Impact of green marketing, greenwashing and green confusion on green brand equity. Spanish Journal of Marketing-ESIC. Ramus, C. A., & Montiel, I. (2005). When are corporate environmental policies a form of greenwashing? Business & society, 44(4), 377-414. Rizzello, A. (2022). Beyond Greenwashing: An Overview of Possible Remedies. Green Investing: Changing Paradigms and Future Directions, 107-132. Ross, S. A. (1977). The determination of financial structure: the incentive-signalling approach. The bell journal of economics, 23-40. Ruiz-Blanco, S., Romero, S., & Fernandez-Feijoo, B. (2022). Green, blue or black, but washing–What company characteristics determine greenwashing? Environment, Development and Sustainability, 1-22. Scott, W. R. (2008). Approaching adulthood: the maturing of institutional theory. Theory and society, 37, 427-442. SEC. (2022a). BNY MELLON INVESTMENT ADVISER, INC. Retrieved from SEC. (2022b). Goldman Sachs Asset Management, L.P. Retrieved from https://www.sec.gov/files/litigation/admin/2022/ia-6189.pdf Seele, P., & Gatti, L. (2017). Greenwashing revisited: In search of a typology and accusation‐based definition incorporating legitimacy strategies. Business strategy and the environment, 26(2), 239-252. Spence, M. (1978). Job market signaling. In Uncertainty in economics (pp. 281-306): Elsevier. Stevens, R., Moray, N., & Bruneel, J. (2015). The social and economic mission of social enterprises: Dimensions, measurement, validation, and relation. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 39(5), 1051-1082. Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of management review, 20(3), 571-610. Szabo, S., & Webster, J. (2021). Perceived greenwashing: the effects of green marketing on environmental and product perceptions. Journal of business ethics, 171, 719-739. Tamimi, N., & Sebastianelli, R. (2017). Transparency among S&P 500 companies: An analysis of ESG disclosure scores. Management Decision, 55(8), 1660-1680. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Retrieved from https://www.sec.gov/ Van Marrewijk, M. (2003). Concepts and definitions of CSR and corporate sustainability: Between agency and communion. Journal of business ethics, 44, 95-105. Waldman, D. A., Siegel, D. S., & Javidan, M. (2006). Components of CEO transformational leadership and corporate social responsibility. Journal of management studies, 43(8), 1703-1725. Walker, K., & Dyck, B. (2014). The primary importance of corporate social responsibility and ethicality in corporate reputation: An empirical study. Business and Society Review, 119(1), 147-174. Walker, K., & Wan, F. (2012). The harm of symbolic actions and green-washing: Corporate actions and communications on environmental performance and their financial implications. Journal of business ethics, 109, 227-242. Wang, H., Ma, B., & Bai, R. (2020). The spillover effect of greenwashing behaviours: An experimental approach. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 38(3), 283-295. WCED, S. W. S. (1987). World commission on environment and development. Our common future, 17(1), 1-91. Wu, W., Liu, Y., Chin, T., & Zhu, W. (2018). Will green CSR enhance innovation? A perspective of public visibility and firm transparency. International journal of environmental research and public health, 15(2), 268. Wu, Y., Zhang, K., & Xie, J. (2020). Bad greenwashing, good greenwashing: Corporate social responsibility and information transparency. Management science, 66(7), 3095-3112. Yuan, X., Li, Z., Xu, J., & Shang, L. (2022). ESG disclosure and corporate financial irregularities–Evidence from Chinese listed firms. Journal of cleaner production, 332, 129992. Zhang, D. (2022). Environmental regulation and firm product quality improvement: How does the greenwashing response? International Review of Financial Analysis, 80, 102058. | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/89465 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | ESG做為日益熱門的國際議題,至今衍生了許多受到廣泛討論的子項目,隨著話題的延燒,ESG領域也面臨著許多爭議及弊端。本研究根據其發展趨勢,從漂綠(Greenwashing)的問題點切入,探討現有研究及相關制度,整理漂綠現象的發展脈絡與變化,並分析企業漂綠行為的類型與模式,試圖在這嶄新的議題中建立完整的研究架構。
較早的文獻探討了漂綠的定義、類型、以及執行方式;而近期的文獻則著重於分析企業漂綠的動機,以及影響企業永續作為與揭露的因素。本研究經由文獻統整,結合對美國監管機關SEC、FTC、以及澳洲監管單位ASIC執行的企業漂綠行為調查與裁罰案件之分析,建構企業永續作為與漂綠程度的理論架構圖,並以民眾的構面進行實證,以驗證理論架構的可行性。 實證研究之迴歸模型設計以民眾環境意識層面之綠色消費與永續知識作為常設自變數,並設定假設條件,以情境式問答瞭解各個因素對民眾觀感造成的影響。結合企業特性、永續衝擊、ESG制度三大層面共九個影響因子,加上無假設條件的一般情境共十個模型,逐一探討民眾對企業永續作為的信任度如何被影響。 研究結果顯示,企業規模、信譽、知名度,以及產業環境與社會衝擊皆會影響民眾的觀感及認知,而ESG制度中除了政府監管的效用不明,其他如第三方認證、ESG評分、以及永續報告書的發布皆會影響民眾對企業的信任。而民眾之環境意識更在每個情境下皆顯著影響,本研究因此而延伸分析了民眾之綠色消費觀念及ESG知識對其他影響因子的調節作用,並由實證結果發現民眾在兩個意識因素下對企業有著不同的判斷。藉由探討影響企業漂綠行為的因素,可以加深對漂綠的認識,進而發展出控制漂綠現象的方法及規範。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | ESG, as an increasingly popular international issue, has so far given rise to many widely discussed subtopics. With the spread of the topic, the field of ESG also faces many controversies and drawbacks. Based on its development trend, this study takes the problem of greenwashing as an entry point, explores existing research and related systems, organizes the development context and changes of the greenwashing phenomenon, and analyzes the types and patterns of corporate greenwashing behaviors, attempting to establish a complete research framework in this emerging issue.
Earlier literature explored the definition, types, and implementation of greenwashing; recent literature has focused on analyzing the motivations of corporate greenwashing and factors that influence corporate sustainable behavior and disclosure. This study, through literature integration and analysis of corporate greenwashing investigations and penalties cases conducted by U.S. regulatory agencies SEC, FTC, and Australian regulatory agency ASIC, constructs a theoretical framework diagram of corporate sustainable behavior and greenwashing degree, and empirically verifies the feasibility of the theoretical framework from the perspective of the public. The regression model design of the empirical study takes green consumption and sustainable knowledge in the public environmental awareness level as constant independent variables and sets hypothetical conditions to understand the impact of various factors on the public perception through situational questioning. Combining nine influencing factors of three major aspects of corporate characteristics, sustainable impact, and ESG system, and a general situation without hypothetical conditions, a total of ten models are individually explored on how the public's trust in corporate sustainable behavior is affected. The research results show that corporate size, reputation, visibility, and industrial environmental and social impacts all affect public perception and cognition. In the ESG system, except for the unclear utility of government regulation, others such as third-party assurance, ESG scoring, and the release of sustainability reports all affect the public's trust in the enterprise. And public environmental awareness significantly affects in every situation. Therefore, this study extends the analysis of the moderating effect of the public's green consumption concept and ESG knowledge on other influencing factors, and it is found from the empirical results that the public has different judgments on enterprises under the two conscious factors. By exploring the factors that influence corporate greenwashing behavior, a deeper understanding of greenwashing can be gained, and methods and norms to control the greenwashing phenomenon can be developed. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2023-09-07T17:07:50Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2023-09-07T17:07:50Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 誌謝 i
摘要 ii Abstract iii 目錄 v 圖目錄 x 表目錄 xi 第一章 緒論 1 1.1 研究背景與動機 1 1.2 研究目的 2 1.3 論文架構 3 第二章 研究方法與步驟 6 2.1 研究方法 6 2.2 研究步驟 7 第三章 文獻回顧 9 3.1 永續性 9 3.1.1 永續性 (Sustainability) 9 3.1.2 企業社會責任 (CSR, Corporate Social Responsibility) 9 3.1.3 ESG (Environmental, Social and Corporate Governance) 10 3.1.4 漂綠 (Greenwashing) 11 3.2 理論基礎 12 3.2.1 制度理論 (Institutional theory) 12 3.2.2 利害關係人理論 (Stakeholder theory) 14 3.2.3 合法性理論 (legitimacy theory) 16 3.2.4 代理理論 (Agency theory) 17 3.2.5 信號理論 (Signaling theory) 19 3.3 漂綠 (Greenwashing) 的相關研究 20 3.3.1 漂綠現象的發展脈絡 20 3.3.2 企業ESG漂綠行為 25 3.3.3 漂綠行為的影響因素 30 第四章 個案研究與分析 33 4.1 美國證券管理委員會(SEC) 33 4.1.1 監管機關 33 4.1.2 案例介紹 33 4.2 聯邦貿易委員會(FTC) 37 4.2.1 監管機關 37 4.2.2 案例介紹 38 4.3 澳大利亞證券投資委員會(ASIC) 40 4.3.1 監管機關 40 4.3.2 案例介紹 41 4.4 案例統整與分析 45 第五章 理論建立與假說推導 50 5.1 企業ESG漂綠行為理論架構建立 50 5.2 影響因素與層面假說推導 55 5.2.1 環境意識層面 55 5.2.2 企業特性層面 57 5.2.3 永續衝擊層面 59 5.2.4 ESG制度層面 61 5.2.5 假說統整 63 第六章 實證研究與模型設計 66 6.1 計量實證研究 66 6.2 實證模型 66 6.2.1 模型一 環境意識 66 6.2.2 模型二 企業規模 67 6.2.3 模型三 企業信譽 67 6.2.4 模型四 企業知名度 68 6.2.5 模型五 環境衝擊 68 6.2.6 模型六 社會衝擊 69 6.2.7 模型七 政府監管 69 6.2.8 模型八 永續報告書 69 6.2.9 模型九 第三方認證 70 6.2.10 模型十 ESG評分 70 6.3 變數說明與量化 71 6.3.1 應變數 71 6.3.2 自變數 74 6.3.3 控制變數 76 6.4 數據整理 77 6.4.1 問卷設定 77 6.4.2 題目設計 77 6.4.3 樣本分布 78 第七章 實證結果與討論 79 7.1 敘述性統計分析 79 7.2 環境意識層面之實證結果與討論 84 7.2.1 控制變數分析 84 7.2.2 環境意識之分析 85 7.2.3 層面假說驗證與討論 86 7.3 企業特性層面之實證結果與討論 87 7.3.1 企業規模之分析 87 7.3.2 企業信譽之分析 89 7.3.3 企業知名度之分析 90 7.3.4 層面假說驗證與討論 91 7.4 永續衝擊層面之實證結果與討論 93 7.4.1 環境衝擊之分析 93 7.4.2 社會衝擊之分析 95 7.4.3 層面假說驗證與討論 96 7.5 ESG制度層面之實證結果與討論 97 7.5.1 政府監管之分析 98 7.5.2 永續報告書之分析 99 7.5.3 第三方認證之分析 100 7.5.4 ESG評分之分析 101 7.5.5 層面假說驗證與討論 102 7.6 綜合結果與討論 105 第八章 民眾環境意識之調節作用:探索性分析 109 8.1 民眾環境意識可能之調節作用 109 8.2 迴歸模型分析與結果討論 109 8.2.1 企業規模之交乘項分析 110 8.2.2 企業信譽之交乘項分析 112 8.2.3 企業知名度之交乘項分析 114 8.2.4 環境衝擊之交乘項分析 116 8.2.5 社會衝擊之交乘項分析 117 8.2.6 永續報告書之交乘項分析 119 8.2.7 第三方認證之交乘項分析 120 8.2.8 ESG評分之交乘項分析 122 8.2.9交乘項分析之綜合結果討論 124 第九章 研究結論與建議 126 9.1 研究結論 126 9.2 範圍與限制 127 9.3 後續建議 128 參考文獻 129 附錄 136 附錄一、問卷格式與題目內容 136 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.subject | 漂綠 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | ESG | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 企業永續 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 計量分析 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 實證研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Corporate Sustainability | en |
| dc.subject | ESG | en |
| dc.subject | Econometric Analysis | en |
| dc.subject | Greenwashing | en |
| dc.subject | Empirical Study | en |
| dc.title | 企業ESG漂綠行為之影響因素與民眾認知:理論推導與實證 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Impact Factors of Corporate ESG Greenwashing and Public Perception : Theoretical Derivation and Empirical Evidence | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 111-2 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 連勇智;王全三;許耀文 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Yung-Chih Lien;Chuan-San Wang;Yao-wen Hsu | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 漂綠,企業永續,ESG,計量分析,實證研究, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Greenwashing,Corporate Sustainability,ESG,Econometric Analysis,Empirical Study, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 140 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202302338 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2023-08-04 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 土木工程學系 | - |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2028-07-28 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 土木工程學系 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-111-2.pdf 此日期後於網路公開 2028-07-28 | 2.86 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
