請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/88769
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 馬鴻文 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.advisor | Hwong-Wen Ma | en |
dc.contributor.author | 楊智凱 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author | Chih-Kai Yang | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-08-15T17:42:43Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-11-09 | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2023-08-15 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2023 | - |
dc.date.submitted | 2023-08-07 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Akram, S. V., Alshamrani, S. S., Singh, R., Rashid, M., Gehlot, A., AlGhamdi, A. S., & Prashar, D. (2021). Blockchain enabled automatic reward system in solid waste management. Security and Communication Networks, 2021, 1-14.
Alharbi, N. S., Alhaji, J. H., & Qattan, M. Y. (2021). Toward sustainable environmental management of healthcare waste: A holistic perspective. Sustainability, 13(9), 5280. Allesch, A., & Brunner, P. H. (2014). Assessment methods for solid waste management: A literature review. Waste Management & Research, 32(6), 461-473. Aloui, N., Almukadi, W., & Belghith, A. (2023). Towards an IOT Approach for Smart Waste Management based on Context Ontology: A Case Study. Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, 13(1), 10186-10191. Angelis-Dimakis, A., Alexandratou, A., & Balzarini, A. (2016). Value chain upgrading in a textile dyeing industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 138, 237-247. Antunes, J. C. C., Eugénio, T., & Branco, M. C. (2022). Circular Economy for Cities and Sustainable Development: The Case of the Portuguese City of Leiria. Sustainability, 14(3), 1726. Appolloni, A., Jabbour, C. J. C., D'Adamo, I., Gastaldi, M., & Settembre-Blundo, D. (2022). Green recovery in the mature manufacturing industry: The role of the green-circular premium and sustainability certification in innovative efforts. Ecological Economics, 193, 107311. Auci, S., & Vignani, D. (2013). Environmental Kuznets curve and domestic material consumption indicator: an European analysis. Awan, U., Gölgeci, I., Makhmadshoev, D., & Mishra, N. (2022). Industry 4.0 and circular economy in an era of global value chains: What have we learned and what is still to be explored?. Journal of Cleaner Production, 133621. Barbosa, F. C. L., & Mol, M. P. G. (2018). Proposal of indicators for healthcare waste management: Case of a Brazilian public institution. Waste Management & Research, 36(10), 934-941. Barkhausen, R., Rostek, L., Miao, Z. C., & Zeller, V. (2023). Combinations of material flow analysis and life cycle assessment and their applicability to assess circular economy requirements in EU product regulations. A systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 137017. Berlin, D., Feldmann, A., & Nuur, C. (2022). Supply network collaborations in a circular economy: A case study of Swedish steel recycling. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 179, 106112. Bevan, R.E. (1969). Controlled tipping of solid urban refuse and suitable industrial waste. Schweiz. Z. Hydrologie, 31, 376–382. Bhubalan, K., Tamothran, A. M., Kee, S. H., Foong, S. Y., Lam, S. S., Ganeson, K., ... & Ramakrishna, S. (2022). Leveraging blockchain concepts as watermarkers of plastics for sustainable waste management in progressing circular economy. Environmental Research, 213, 113631. Bianchi, M., & Cordella, M. (2023). Does circular economy mitigate the extraction of natural resources? Empirical evidence based on analysis of 28 European economies over the past decade. Ecological Economics, 203, 107607. Bilitewski, B. (2012). The circular economy and its risks. Waste management, 32(1), 1-2. Bocken, N. M., De Pauw, I., Bakker, C., & Van Der Grinten, B. (2016). Product design and business model strategies for a circular economy. Journal of industrial and production engineering, 33(5), 308-320. Bouton, S., Hannon, E., Rogers, M., Swartz, S., Johnson, R., Gold, A., & Staples, M. (2016). The circular economy: Moving from theory to practice. McKinsey center for business and environment. Special edition. Brundtland, G. H. (1987). Our common future—Call for action. Environmental conservation, 14(4), 291-294. Brunner, P. H., & Rechberger, H. Practical handbook of material flow analysis. 2004. New York: Lewis, 317. Calzolari, T., Genovese, A., & Brint, A. (2022). Circular Economy indicators for supply chains: A systematic literature review. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators, 13, 100160. Campitelli, A., & Schebek, L. (2020). How is the performance of waste management systems assessed globally? A systematic review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 272, 122986. Campitelli, A., Aryoug, O., Ouazzani, N., Bockreis, A., & Schebek, L. (2023). Assessing the performance of a waste management system towards a circular economy in the Global South: The case of Marrakech (Morocco). Waste Management, 166, 259-269. Campitelli, A., Kannengießer, J., & Schebek, L. (2022). Approach to assess the performance of waste management systems towards a circular economy: waste management system development stage concept (WMS-DSC). MethodsX, 9, 101634. Castiglione, A., Cimmino, L., Di Nardo, M., & Murino, T. (2023). A framework for achieving a circular economy using the blockchain technology in a sustainable waste management system. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 180, 109263. Castro, C. G., Trevisan, A. H., Pigosso, D. C., & Mascarenhas, J. (2022). The rebound effect of circular economy: Definitions, mechanisms and a research agenda. Journal of Cleaner Production, 345, 131136. Chauhan, A., Jakhar, S. K., & Chauhan, C. (2021). The interplay of circular economy with industry 4.0 enabled smart city drivers of healthcare waste disposal. Journal of cleaner production, 279, 123854. Chen, L. H., Hung, P., & Ma, H. W. (2020). Integrating circular business models and development tools in the circular economy transition process: A firm‐level framework. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(5), 1887-1898. Chowdhury, N. R., Paul, S. K., Sarker, T., & Shi, Y. (2023). Implementing smart waste management system for a sustainable circular economy in the textile industry. International Journal of Production Economics, 262, 108876. Corona, B., Shen, L., Reike, D., Carreón, J. R., & Worrell, E. (2019). Towards sustainable development through the circular economy—A review and critical assessment on current circularity metrics. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 151, 104498. Di Foggia, G., & Beccarello, M. (2021). Designing waste management systems to meet circular economy goals: The Italian case. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 26, 1074-1083. Dieterle, M., Schäfer, P., & Viere, T. (2018). Life cycle gaps: interpreting LCA results with a circular economy mindset. Procedia CIRP, 69, 764-768. EASAC (European Academis’ Science Advisory Council). (2016). Indicators for a circular economy, EASAC policy report 30, German National Academy of Sciences Leopoldina 2016 EEA. (2021). Digital technologies will deliver more efficient waste management in Europe. Retrieved May 17, 2023, from https://www.eea.europa.eu/themes/waste/waste-management/digital-technologies-will-deliver-more Elia, V., Gnoni, M. G., & Tornese, F. (2017). Measuring circular economy strategies through index methods: A critical analysis. Journal of cleaner production, 142, 2741-2751. Ellen MacArthur Foundation (EMF); World Economic Forum; McKinsey & Company (2014). Towards the Circular Economy Vol. 3, Accelerating the scale-up across global supply chains. Ellen MacArthur Foundation. (2015). Circularity indicators: An approach to measuring circularity. Methodology. EU Commission. (2008). Directive 2008/98/EC of the european parliament and of the council of 19 november 2008 on waste and repealing certain directives (waste framework directive). LexUriServ. do European Commission. (2020). A New Circular Economy Action Plan. For a Cleaner and More Competitive Europe, 1-19. European Union Eurostat (2021). Waste generation by economic activities and household 2018 (% share of total waste). Retrieved March 5, 2023, from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=File:Waste_generation_by_economic_activities_and_households,_2018_(%25_share_of_total_waste_)_30-04-2021.png European Union Eurostat. (2022). Circular economy indicators. Retrieved March 19, 2022, from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/circular economy/indicators/monitoring framework Fatimah, Y. A., Govindan, K., Murniningsih, R., & Setiawan, A. (2020). Industry 4.0 based sustainable circular economy approach for smart waste management system to achieve sustainable development goals: A case study of Indonesia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 269, 122263. Fauzi, R. T., Lavoie, P., Sorelli, L., Heidari, M. D., & Amor, B. (2019). Exploring the current challenges and opportunities of life cycle sustainability assessment. Sustainability, 11(3), 636. Ferronato, N., Ragazzi, M., Torrez Elias, M. S., Gorritty Portillo, M. A., Guisbert Lizarazu, E. G., & Torretta, V. (2020). Application of healthcare waste indicators for assessing infectious waste management in Bolivia. Waste Management & Research, 38(1), 4-18. Franco, N. G., Almeida, M. F. L., & Calili, R. F. (2021). A strategic measurement framework to monitor and evaluate circularity performance in organizations from a transition perspective. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 27, 1165-1182. Franklin-Johnson, E., Figge, F., & Canning, L. (2016). Resource duration as a managerial indicator for Circular Economy performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 133, 589-598. Ghisellini, P., Cialani, C., & Ulgiati, S. (2016). A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems. Journal of Cleaner production, 114, 11-32. Giurco, D., Littleboy, A., Boyle, T., Fyfe, J., & White, S. (2014). Circular economy: questions for responsible minerals, additive manufacturing and recycling of metals. Resources, 3(2), 432-453. Hadzic, A., Voca, N., & Golubic, S. (2018). Life-cycle assessment of solid-waste management in city of Zagreb, Croatia. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management, 20(2), 1286-1298. Hansen, W., Christopher, M., & Verbuecheln, M. (2002). EU waste policy and challenges for regional and local authorities. Ecological Institute for International and European Environmental Policy: Berlin, Germany. Haupt, M., Vadenbo, C., & Hellweg, S. (2017). Do we have the right performance indicators for the circular economy?: insight into the Swiss waste management system. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 21(3), 615-627. Hughes, S. (1976). National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (PL 91-190): Bibliography. Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress. Iacovidou, E., Millward-Hopkins, J., Busch, J., Purnell, P., Velis, C. A., Hahladakis, J. N., ... & Brown, A. (2017). A pathway to circular economy: Developing a conceptual framework for complex value assessment of resources recovered from waste. Journal of cleaner production, 168, 1279-1288. Jerome, A., Helander, H., Ljunggren, M., & Janssen, M. (2022). Mapping and testing circular economy product-level indicators: A critical review. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 178, 106080. Karayılan, S., Yılmaz, Ö., Uysal, Ç., & Naneci, S. (2021). Prospective evaluation of circular economy practices within plastic packaging value chain through optimization of life cycle impacts and circularity. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 173, 105691. Kenny, C., & Priyadarshini, A. (2021). Review of current healthcare waste management methods and their effect on global health. Healthcare (Vol. 9, No. 3, p. 284). MDPI. Khan, F., Ahmed, W., Najmi, A., & Younus, M. (2019). Managing plastic waste disposal by assessing consumers’ recycling behavior: the case of a densely populated developing country. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26, 33054-33066. Khan, S. A. R., Zia‐ul‐haq, H. M., Umar, M., & Yu, Z. (2021). Digital technology and circular economy practices: An strategy to improve organizational performance. Business Strategy & Development, 4(4), 482-490. Kirchherr, J., Reike, D., & Hekkert, M. (2017). Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions. Resources, conservation and recycling, 127, 221-232. Kristensen, H. S., & Mosgaard, M. A. (2020). A review of micro level indicators for a circular economy–moving away from the three dimensions of sustainability?. Journal of Cleaner Production, 243, 118531. Lacy, P., & Rutqvist, J. (2015). Waste to wealth: The circular economy advantage (Vol. 91). London: Palgrave Macmillan. Laso, J., García-Herrero, I., Margallo, M., Vázquez-Rowe, I., Fullana, P., Bala, A., ... & Aldaco, R. (2018). Finding an economic and environmental balance in value chains based on circular economy thinking: An eco-efficiency methodology applied to the fish canning industry. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 133, 428-437. Lewandowski, M. (2016). Designing the business models for circular economy—Towards the conceptual framework. Sustainability, 8(1), 43. Li, S. (2012). The research on quantitative evaluation of circular economy based on waste input-output analysis. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 12, 65-71. Li, Y. M., Wang, C. F., Wang, L. J., Huang, T. Y., & Zhou, G. Z. (2020). Removal of heavy metals in medical waste incineration fly ash by Na2EDTA combined with zero-valent iron and recycle of Na2EDTA: Acolumnar experiment study. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 70(9), 904-914. Lieder, M., & Rashid, A. (2016). Towards circular economy implementation: a comprehensive review in context of manufacturing industry. Journal of cleaner production, 115, 36-51. Lonca, G., Muggéo, R., Imbeault-Tétreault, H., Bernard, S., & Margni, M. (2018). Does material circularity rhyme with environmental efficiency? Case studies on used tires. Journal of Cleaner Production, 183, 424-435. Luis, E. C., & Celma, D. (2020). Circular economy. A review and bibliometric analysis. Sustainability, 12(16), 6381. Luttenberger, L. R. (2020). Waste management challenges in transition to circular economy–case of Croatia. Journal of Cleaner production, 256, 120495. Maio, F. D., & Rem, P. C. (2015). A robust indicator for promoting circular economy through recycling. Journal of Environmental Protection, 6(10), 1105-1117. Márquez, A. J. C., & Rutkowski, E. W. (2020). Waste management drivers towards a circular economy in the global south–The Colombian case. Waste Management, 110, 53-65. Martin, M., Wetterlund, E., Hackl, R., Holmgren, K. M., & Peck, P. (2020). Assessing the aggregated environmental benefits from by-product and utility synergies in the Swedish biofuel industry. Biofuels, 11(6), 683-698. Mayer, A., Haas, W., Wiedenhofer, D., Krausmann, F., Nuss, P., & Blengini, G. A. (2019). Measuring progress towards a circular economy: a monitoring framework for economy‐wide material loop closing in the EU28. Journal of industrial ecology, 23(1), 62-76. Merli, R., Preziosi, M., & Acampora, A. (2018). How do scholars approach the circular economy? A systematic literature review. Journal of cleaner production, 178, 703-722. Mesa, J., González-Quiroga, A., & Maury, H. (2020). Developing an indicator for material selection based on durability and environmental footprint: A Circular Economy perspective. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 160, 104887. Moraga, G., Huysveld, S., Mathieux, F., Blengini, G. A., Alaerts, L., Van Acker, K., ... & Dewulf, J. (2019). Circular economy indicators: What do they measure?. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 146, 452-461. Morseletto, P. (2020). Targets for a circular economy. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 153, 104553. National Statistics Republic of China, (2021), Statistical Classification of Industries (Rev.11,2021) Retrived from https://eng.stat.gov.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=2597&s=224515 Nelles, M., Gruenes, J., & Morscheck, G. (2016). Waste management in Germany–development to a sustainable circular economy?. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 35, 6-14. OECD. Publishing. (2001). Extended producer responsibility: A guidance manual for governments. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Pal, M. S., & Bhatia, M. (2022). Smart Solid Waste Management System Using IoT Technology: Comparative Analysis, Gaps, and Challenges. In International Conference on Intelligent Cyber Physical Systems and Internet of Things (pp. 795-811). Cham: Springer International Publishing. Panchal, R., Singh, A., & Diwan, H. (2021). Does circular economy performance lead to sustainable development?–A systematic literature review. Journal of Environmental Management, 293, 112811. Parchomenko, A., Nelen, D., Gillabel, J., & Rechberger, H. (2019). Measuring the circular economy-A Multiple Correspondence Analysis of 63 metrics. Journal of cleaner production, 210, 200-216. Pauliuk, S. (2018). Critical appraisal of the circular economy standard BS 8001: 2017 and a dashboard of quantitative system indicators for its implementation in organizations. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 129, 81-92. Peña, C., Civit, B., Gallego-Schmid, A., Druckman, A., Pires, A. C., Weidema, B., ... & Motta, W. (2021). Using life cycle assessment to achieve a circular economy. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 26, 215-220. Pieroni, M. P., McAloone, T. C., & Pigosso, D. C. (2021). Circular economy business model innovation: Sectorial patterns within manufacturing companies. Journal of cleaner production, 286, 124921. Pires, A., & Martinho, G. (2019). Waste hierarchy index for circular economy in waste management. Waste Management, 95, 298-305. Qu, C., Shao, J., & Cheng, Z. (2020). Can embedding in global value chain drive green growth in China’s manufacturing industry?. Journal of Cleaner Production, 268, 121962. Ranjbari, M., Esfandabadi, Z. S., Zanetti, M. C., Scagnelli, S. D., Siebers, P. O., Aghbashlo, M., ... & Tabatabaei, M. (2021). Three pillars of sustainability in the wake of COVID-19: A systematic review and future research agenda for sustainable development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 297, 126660. Ranjbari, M., Saidani, M., Esfandabadi, Z. S., Peng, W., Lam, S. S., Aghbashlo, M., ... & Tabatabaei, M. (2021). Two decades of research on waste management in the circular economy: Insights from bibliometric, text mining, and content analyses. Journal of Cleaner Production, 314, 128009. Ratnasabapathy, S., Perera, S., & Alashwal, A. (2019). A review of smart technology usage in construction and demolition waste management. Rocha, M. C. R. M. D. (2020). Economia circular: para além do reaproveitamento de resíduos. Saavedra, Y. M., Iritani, D. R., Pavan, A. L., & Ometto, A. R. (2018). Theoretical contribution of industrial ecology to circular economy. Journal of cleaner production, 170, 1514-1522. Saavedra, Y. M., Iritani, D. R., Pavan, A. L., & Ometto, A. R. (2018). Theoretical contribution of industrial ecology to circular economy. Journal of cleaner production, 170, 1514-1522. Sahoo, S., Mukherjee, A., & Halder, R. (2021). A unified blockchain-based platform for global e-waste management. International Journal of Web Information Systems, 17(5), 449-479. Saidani, M., Yannou, B., Leroy, Y., Cluzel, F., & Kendall, A. (2019). A taxonomy of circular economy indicators. Journal of Cleaner Production, 207, 542-559. Schmelz, D., Pinter, K., Strobl, S., Zhu, L., Niemeier, P., & Grechenig, T. (2019, April). Technical mechanics of a trans-border waste flow tracking solution based on blockchain technology. In 2019 IEEE 35th international conference on data engineering workshops (ICDEW) (pp. 31-36). IEEE. Schulte, U. G. (2013). New business models for a radical change in resource efficiency. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 9, 43-47. Sharma, M., Joshi, S., & Kumar, A. (2020). Assessing enablers of e-waste management in circular economy using DEMATEL method: An Indian perspective. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(12), 13325-13338. Singh, T., Ghimire, T. R., & Agrawal, S. K. (2018). Awareness of biomedical waste management in dental students in different dental colleges in Nepal. BioMed research international, 2018. Soldatos, J., Kefalakis, N., Despotopoulou, A. M., Bodin, U., Musumeci, A., Scandura, A., ... & Colledani, M. (2021). A digital platform for cross-sector collaborative value networks in the circular economy. Procedia Manufacturing, 54, 64-69. Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress. (2008). Circular Economy Promotion Law of the People’s Republic of China. 中华人民共和国循环经济促进法. Su, B., Heshmati, A., Geng, Y., & Yu, X. (2013). A review of the circular economy in China: moving from rhetoric to implementation. Journal of cleaner production, 42, 215-227. Taiwan Environmental Protection Administration (2020). Standards for Defining Hazardous Industrial Waste. Retrieved July 5, 2023, from https://law.moj.gov.tw/ENG/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=O0050023 Taiwan Environmental Protection Administration (TEPA) (2021). Annual Waste Report. Retrieved from https://waste3.epa.gov.tw/download/waste_web/statistics_file/Year/WasteApply_110.pdf Tanzer, J., & Rechberger, H. (2019). Setting the common ground: A generic framework for material flow analysis of complex systems. Recycling, 4(2), 23. Tsai, F. M., Bui, T. D., Tseng, M. L., Lim, M. K., & Hu, J. (2020). Municipal solid waste management in a circular economy: A data-driven bibliometric analysis. Journal of cleaner production, 275, 124132. UNECE (2021). Promoting circular economy and sustainable use of natural resources in the UNECE Region. Retrieved from: https://unece.org/sites/default/files/2021-06/National%20Action%20Plans%20of%20UNECE%20member%20States%20on%20the%20circular%20economy.pdf United Nations. (2008). International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (Revision 4), Retrieved from https://unstats.un.org/unsd/publication/seriesM/seriesm_4rev4e.pdf Van Ewijk, S., & Stegemann, J. A. (2016). Limitations of the waste hierarchy for achieving absolute reductions in material throughput. Journal of Cleaner Production, 132, 122-128. Vanner, R., Bicket, M., Withana, S., Brink, P. T., Razzini, P., Dijl, E. V., & Hudson, C. (2014). Scoping study to identify potential circular economy actions, priority sectors, material flows and value chains. European Commission. Vignesh, K. S., Rajadesingu, S., & Arunachalam, K. D. (2021). Challenges, issues, and problems with zero-waste tools. In Concepts of Advanced Zero Waste Tools (pp. 69-90). Elsevier. Voskamp, I. M., Stremke, S., Spiller, M., Perrotti, D., van der Hoek, J. P., & Rijnaarts, H. H. (2017). Enhanced performance of the Eurostat method for comprehensive assessment of urban metabolism: A material flow analysis of Amsterdam. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 21(4), 887-902. Voudrias, E. A. (2018). Healthcare waste management from the point of view of circular economy. Waste Management (New York, NY), 75, 1-2. Wang, Y., & Ma, H. W. (2018). Analysis of uncertainty in material flow analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 170, 1017-1028. Westin, A. L., Kalmykova, Y., Rosado, L., Oliveira, F., Laurenti, R., & Rydberg, T. (2019). Combining material flow analysis with life cycle assessment to identify environmental hotspots of urban consumption. Journal of Cleaner Production, 226, 526-539. Ma, H. W., Shih, H. C., & Liao, M. I. (2021). Circular Economy and New Research Directions in Sustainability. In Pursuing Sustainability (pp. 141-168). Whiteman, A., Webster, M., & Wilson, D. C. (2021). The nine development bands: A conceptual framework and global theory for waste and development. Waste Management & Research, 39(10), 1218-1236. World Health Organization (2014). Safe Management of Wastes from Health-care Activities. Retrieved July 5, 2023, from https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/85349/9789241548564_eng.pdf;sequence=1 World Health Organization. (2017). Report on health-care waste management (HCWM) status in Countries of the South-East Asia Region (No. SEA-EH-593). World Health Organization. Regional Office for South-East Asia. Wu, H., Zuo, J., Zillante, G., Wang, J., & Yuan, H. (2019). Status quo and future directions of construction and demolition waste research: A critical review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 240, 118163. Yoon, C. W., Kim, M. J., Park, Y. S., Jeon, T. W., & Lee, M. Y. (2022). A review of medical waste management systems in the Republic of Korea for hospital and medical waste generated from the COVID-19 pandemic. Sustainability, 14(6), 3678. Zaman, A. U. (2015). A comprehensive review of the development of zero waste management: lessons learned and guidelines. Journal of Cleaner Production, 91, 12-25. Zampori, L., & Pant, R. (2019). Suggestions for updating the Product Environmental Footprint (PEF) method. Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg. Zeller, V., Towa, E., Degrez, M., & Achten, W. M. (2019). Urban waste flows and their potential for a circular economy model at city-region level. Waste management, 83, 83-94. Zhang, A., Venkatesh, V. G., Liu, Y., Wan, M., Qu, T., & Huisingh, D. (2019). Barriers to smart waste management for a circular economy in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 240, 118198. Zhang, C., Hu, M., Di Maio, F., Sprecher, B., Yang, X., & Tukker, A. (2022). An overview of the waste hierarchy framework for analyzing the circularity in construction and demolition waste management in Europe. Science of the Total Environment, 803, 149892. Zurbrügg, C., Caniato, M., & Vaccari, M. (2014). How assessment methods can support solid waste management in developing countries - A critical review. Sustainability, 6(2), 545-570. | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/88769 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 循環經濟 (Circular Economy, CE) 的全球迅速普及,反映出生產體系積極擺脫 「開採-製造-廢棄 (take-make-waste)」的線性經濟模式,而轉向追求資源效能及附加價值的最大化。從工業廢棄物管理的角度,這反映出從以提升回收率為主的「擴大回收產業」目標,轉型為追求永續資源循環,以達到「廢棄物為資源」的零廢棄目標。而有效的績效管理,是達到上述轉型所不可或缺的重要關鍵。
然而,文獻顯示既有工業廢棄物管理績效評估有諸多問題與挑戰,例如過度依賴「回收率」、缺乏具備全面性的永續評估模式、可供績效評估之廢棄物管理資料有限、無法提供產業的深入洞察、無法提供政策制定所要的發展趨勢、以及在不同時空尺度下的應用性等。 為解決上述問題,本研究提出了「循環度績效 (Circularity Performance)」的概念,用以評估工業廢棄物管理的循環經濟轉型。循環度績效主要基於下面的方程式 循環度績效(CP) = 回收率(recycling rate, R) * 回收循環度 (recycling circularity, RC) 上述方程式將工業廢棄物管理的循環度定義為數量 (回收率) 及品質 (回收循環度) 的綜效。新建立的指標「回收循環度」代表了廢棄物再利用的相關效率。其計算方式採用一般的工業廢棄物管理資料,透過新建立的「循環等級 (Circularity level)」概念,以廢棄物層級 (Waste Hierarchy)、價格及循環性 (loop)等三個面向進行環境、經濟及社會面相的優選後,將其量化。 本研究以「循環度績效」為基礎,建立了兩種不同的指數系統。「循環度績效指數(Circularity Performance Index, CPI)」主要用於定期的年度廢物管理績效評估,並可進行跨產業的績效比較。而「動態循環度績效指數(DCPI)」設計為以協助政策成效分析及制定為目標,可提供反映產業特性的較深入分析及時間序列的發展趨勢分析。 本研究透過兩個個案分析,針對兩個指數系統實際應用性的驗證。案例一以國內27個製造業部門為對象,進行2021年度廢棄物管理績效的評估,以示範其在國家和產業層級的適用性。結果顯示與過去僅以「回收率」做為評估指標的結果有很大的差異。「回收率」及「回收循環度」兩個指標的關聯性低,因此有高「回收率」的部門,由於低「回收循環度」而在整體「循環度績效」表現不佳。驗證了依賴「回收率」做為績效指標的局限性,同時強也反映出再利用效率對於整體循環度提升的重要性。此外,結果也反映出了部份影響廢棄物再利用決策的外部因素,例如廢棄物成分、費用、市場需求及處理技術可及性等。 案例二以國內醫療廢棄物為對象,以DCPI分析2014年至2021年的醫療廢棄物(僅包括醫院及診所)管理績效。結果也同樣反應出基於「回收率」進行績效評估的侷限性。例如2019年至2020年間,回收率由33.12% 下跌至僅12.2%,似乎反映出管理績效的下滑。然而,「回收循環度」及實質「循環度績效」顯示同期除了回收效率維持同等水平,其實際回收量也有所增加。也反映出在COVID-19 造成的極端醫療廢棄物產量暴增327%的情況下,不適合單以「回收率」作為績效指標。在「公告應回收或再利用廢棄物(R類)」醫療廢棄物的評估結果顯示,該類別在評估期間的「回收率顯著增長」,但若納入「循環度績效」及「回收循環性」的考量,則會發現整體回收效率下跌的情形。除了從數據上反映出績效的變化,研究結果也顯示出了幾個影響醫療產業循環轉型的獨特現象,包括監管控制、一次性使用、廢棄物的危害性、廢棄物分類方式、政策誘因和回收量能。 本評估模式仍有許多可進一步發展之潛力,包括擴大廢棄物生命週期的涵蓋及改善「回收循環度」量化模式等。可提升工業廢棄物管理績效評估,以協助產業的循環轉型。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | The rapid global adoption of the circular economy (CE) concept signifies a paradigm shift in the global production system, promoting a transition away from the linear “take-make-waste” model towards maximizing resource intensity and value addition. For industrial waste management, the transition has led to a shift from quantity driven concept focusing on “expansion of recycling industry” to the pursuit of optimal resource recovery quality through achieving “waste as resource”. Existing literatures highlights various issues and challenges in the existing industrial WM performance assessment practice, such as the over dependance on the conventional indicator “recycling rate”; the lack of a holistic sustainability assessment approach; limited waste management data available for performance assessment; inability to provide industry-specific insights; limited ability to reveal development trends for policy formulation; and application challenges across spatial and temporal levels.
To address the aforementioned challenges, this research proposes the “circularity performance” concept for assessing the CE transition of waste management practice. The concept is based on a simple equation of Circularity performance (Cp) = Recycling rate (R) * Recycling circularity (Rc) This equation defines circularity performance for industrial waste management as the product of quantity (recycling rate) and quality (recycling circularity). The newly introduced indicator “recycling circularity” represents the relative recycling efficiency of waste recycling processes. Quantification of “recycling circularity” utilizes standard industrial waste management data is made possible through a novel approach named “circularity level” concept, which allows for integrated assessment from environmental, economic and social perspectives. Two index systems are established based on this concept. The Circularity Performance Index (CPI) is designed for regular annual WM performance assessment and enables inter-sectoral performance comparison. On the other hand, the Dynamic Circularity Performance Index (DCPI) is tailored to support policy formulation by providing industry-specific insights and development trend over a defined timeframe. To demonstrate the feasibility of the two index systems, two case studies were conducted. The first case study assesses 27 manufacturing sectors in 2021 using the CPI to illustrate its applicability at national and sectoral levels. The result differs significantly from assessment using only “recycling rate” alone with sectors having high recycling rates performing poorly in overall CPI due to low recycling circularity, and vice versa. This outcome has several significant implications. The weak correlation between “recycling rate” and “recycling circularity” aligns with the observed limitation of assessing through “recycling rate” alone, while underscoring the importance of considering the quality of recycling process. In addition, the result reveals the potential impact of various factors influencing waste recycling decision, such as waste composition, cost, market demand and technology availability. The second case study examines Taiwan’s medical waste management performance from 2014 to 2021 using DCPI. Again, result shows the limitation of performance assessment by “recycling rate” alone. For example, the significant decline in the recycling rate from 33.12% to only 12.2% between 2019 and 2020 might be interpret as a decline in environmental performance. However, the increase in both overall recycling efficiency and total volume of waste recycled, as demonstrated by CPI and DCPI reveals a well-maintained resource recovery performance in coping with the surge in total waste generation caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. Similarly, while the “recyclable waste’ category shows a significant improvement in “recycling rate” over the assessment period, the “recycling circularity” results highlight a degradation in recycling quality. The synergy between the newly introduced indicators reveals several unique phenomena influencing the CE transition of the medical industry, including regulatory control, the single-use mindset, hazardous nature of the waste, the classification of waste, policy incentives, and recycling capacity. Further improvement can be made to expand the coverage to all life cycle stages and refine the method for determining the relative recycling circularity of treatment performance. Such advancements can enhance waste management performance assessment and contribute to the development of effective CE transition strategies and policies. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2023-08-15T17:42:43Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2023-08-15T17:42:43Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 摘要 i
Abstract iii List of Tables x List of Figures xi Chapter 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Evolution of waste management 1 1.2 The waste management transition towards a circularity economy 3 1.3 The current status and challenges in assessment circularity of waste management 4 1.4 Research Framework 7 Chapter 2 Literature Review 8 2.1 Sustainable development, circular economy and waste management 8 2.1.1 Sustainable development and circular economy 8 2.1.2 Waste management and circular economy 9 2.2 Current state of Industrial WM monitoring 11 2.3 Overview of circularity evaluation tools and methods 12 2.4 Challenges in measuring circularity of industrial waste management 15 Chapter 3 Methodology 17 3.1 The “Circularity Performance” concept for waste management 17 3.1.1 The Circularity Performance Index (CPI) 19 3.1.2 The “circularity level” approach for quantification of recycling circularity 20 3.1.2.1 Identification of circular economy criteria and sustainability preferences 20 3.1.2.2 Circularity classification for industrial waste management 24 3.1.2.3 Quantification procedure for “recycling circularity” 26 3.1.3 The Dynamic Circularity Performance Index (DCPI) Concept 28 3.2 Circularity Performance Evaluation Framework 32 3.2.1 Framework structure 32 3.2.2 Scoping 33 3.2.3 Data collection and preparation 34 3.2.4 Calculation 34 3.2.4.1 Circularity level determination 34 3.2.4.2 Waste Characterization 34 3.2.4.3 Calculation procedure 35 3.3 Result interpretation 35 3.3.1 Result ranking 35 3.3.2 Quadrant Analysis Diagram 36 3.3.3 Circularity level distribution 37 Chapter 4 Results 39 4.1 Case Study 1: CPI - 2021 Taiwan Manufacturing Industry (27 sectors) 39 4.1.1 Background 39 4.1.2 Scoping 40 4.1.2.1 System boundary 40 4.1.2.2 Industry classification 41 4.1.2.3 Industrial waste recycling processes 42 4.1.3 Data Collection and preparation 43 4.1.4 Calculation 44 4.1.5 Results 44 4.1.5.1 Numerical result and ranking of the calculated result 44 4.1.5.2 Quadrant analysis 46 4.1.5.3 Circularity level distribution diagram 48 4.1.6 Key findings 49 4.2 Case study 2: DCPI for 2014-2021 Taiwan medical industry 53 4.2.1 General background 53 4.2.2 Scoping 55 4.2.3 Data collection and preparation 55 4.2.4 Calculation 55 4.2.4.1 Waste Characterization 55 4.2.4.2 Calculation 57 4.2.5 Result 58 4.2.5.1 General results 58 4.2.5.2 Quadrant analysis 63 4.2.5.3 Circularity level distribution analysis 66 4.2.6 Key findings 69 4.2.6.1 Overall performance for total medical waste 69 4.2.6.2 Overall performance for Hazardous medical waste 70 4.2.6.3 Overall performance for Biomedical waste 70 4.2.6.4 Overall performance for General medical waste 71 4.2.6.5 Overall performance for Recyclable medical waste 71 4.2.6.6 Factors influencing the CE transition of medical industry 72 Chapter 5 Discussions 74 5.1 Limitation of “recycling rate” as CE performance indicator 74 5.2 Application of "recycling circularity” for measuring waste management performance 75 5.3 The practical application of the circularity performance concept 76 5.4 The practical implication of DCPI 77 5.5 Comparison with other waste hierarchy-based CE assessment methods 77 5.6 Limitation of “waste hierarchy” concept 78 5.7 CE assessment criteria for industrial waste management 79 5.8 “Waste characterization” for obtaining industry-specific insight 79 5.9 Limitations 80 Chapter 6 Conclusions 82 References 85 Appendices 96 | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.title | 建構循環度績效指數分析廢棄物管理循環現況及潛力 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Measuring circularity potential of waste management practice using the Circularity Performance Index | en |
dc.type | Thesis | - |
dc.date.schoolyear | 111-2 | - |
dc.description.degree | 博士 | - |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 李公哲;闕蓓德;胡憲倫;林俊旭 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Kung-Cheh Li;Pei-Te Chiueh;Allen H. Hu;Chun-Hsu Lin | en |
dc.subject.keyword | 循環經濟,廢棄物管理,績效指標,循環度,永續發展, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | circular economy,waste management,performance indicator,circularity,sustainable development, | en |
dc.relation.page | 98 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202303100 | - |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | - |
dc.date.accepted | 2023-08-09 | - |
dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | - |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 環境工程學研究所 | - |
顯示於系所單位: | 環境工程學研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-111-2.pdf | 2.17 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。