請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/8868完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 江宜樺 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Yi-Hsin Hsiao | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 蕭宜馨 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-20T20:02:57Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2009-08-20 | |
| dc.date.available | 2021-05-20T20:02:57Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2009-08-20 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2009 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2009-08-19 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 參考書目
Barber, Benjamin R. 1984 Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age. Berkeley: University of California Press. 1988 “Participation and Swiss Democracy.” Government and Oppositon 23（1）: 31-50. Bluhm, William T. 1984 “Freedom in The Social Contract: Rousseau’s Legitimate Chains.” Polity 16（3）:359-383. Carpenter, Niles H. 1920 “The Literature of Guild Socialism.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 34（4）:763-776. Cohen, Joshua 1986 “Reflections on Rousseau: Autonomy and Democracy.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 15（3）: 275-297. Cole, G. D. H. 1920 Guild Socialism Re-stated. London: Leonard Parsons. 1958 《政治理論系統》，劉成韶（譯）。台北：三民書局。 Dunn, William N. 1975 “Communal Federalism: Dialectics of Decentralization in Socialist Yugoslavia.” Publius 5（2）：127-150. Elden, J. Maxwell 1981 “Political Efficacy at Work: The Connection between More Autonomous Forms of Workplace Organization and a More Participatory Politics.” The American Political Science Review 75（1）：43-58. Elliott, W. Y. 1925 “Sovereign State or Sovereign Group.” The American Political Science Review 19（3）：475-499. Greenberg, Edward S. 1981 “Industrial Democracy and the Democratic Citizen.” The Journal of Politics 43（4）：964-981. Lane, Robert E. 1985 “From Political to Industrial Democracy?” Polity 17（4）: 623-648. Leonardson, Gene S. and Dimitar Mircev 1979 “A Structure for Participatory Democracy in the Local Community: the Yugoslav Constitution of 1974.” Comparative Politics 11（2）: 189-203. Martin, Kingsley 1926 “The Return of the State.” Economica 16: 40-48. McArdle, Ann 1977 “Rousseau on Rousseau: the Individual and Society.” The Review of Politics 39（2）: 250-279. McRae, Kenneth D. 1979 “The Plural Society and the Western Political Tradition.” Canadian Journal of Political Science / Revue Canadienne de Science politique 12 （4）:675-688. Mead, Walter B. 1974 “Review: Participatory Democracy.” The Review of Politics 36（1）: 205-206. Pateman, Carole 1970 Participation and Democracy Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1978 《參與和民主理論》，朱堅章、呂文通等（譯），台北：幼獅文化。 Riddell, Neil 1995 “The Age of Cole? G. D. H. Cole and the British Labour Movement 1929-1933.” The Historical Journal 38（4）: 933-957. Rousseau, Jean-Jacques 1987 《社會契約論》，何兆武（譯），台北：唐山出版社。 1993 The Social Contract and the Discourses. Trans. G. D. H. Cole. London: Everyman’s Library. 1997a The Discourses and Other Early Political Writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1997b The Social Contract and Other Later Political Writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Salkever, Stephen G. 1977 “Interpreting Rousseau’s Paradoxes.” Eighteenth-Century Studies 11（2）: 204-226. 1978 “Rousseau & the Concept of Happiness.” Polity 11（1）:27-45. Schonfeld, William R. 1975 “Review: the Meaning of Democratic Participation.” World Politics 28 （1）: 134-158. Schweizer, Steven L. 1995 “Participation, Workplace Democracy, and the Problem of Representative Government.” Polity 27（3）:359-377. Shabad, Goldie 1980 “Strikes in Yugoslavia: Implications for Industrial Democracy.” British Journal of Political Science 10（3）：293-315. Shabad, Goldie and Sidney Verba 1978 “Workers’ Councils and Political Stratification: The Yugoslav Experience.” The American Political Science Review 72（1）：80-95. Simpson, Matthew 2006 “A Paradox of Sovereignty in Rousseau’s Social Contract.” Journal of Moral 3: 45-56. Slider, Darrell 1986 “Worker Participation in Socialist Systems: The Soviet Case.” Comparative Politics 18（4）: 401-418. Stefanson, Dominic 2004 “Rousseau’s Reveries: the Juvenile Independence of the Solitary Walker.” Paper presented at the Australasian Political Studies Association Conference, 29 September- 1 October, South Australia, Australia. 江宜樺 2001 《自由民主的理路》，台北：聯經出版社。 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/8868 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 對於民主制度的想像，直接民主與代議民主無疑處於光譜的兩端，而囿於公共事務的千頭萬緒，以及公民忙碌的日常行程甚至所謂的「政治冷漠」，代議民主於是成為最主流的民主形式。然而當代議民主發展到極致時，卻也有不夠重視公民政治行動的缺失，不僅有礙公民能力的發展，恐也有害政治制度的穩定。
在代議民主的這些批判者之中，強力捍衛「人民主權」原則的盧梭無疑是相當傑出的一位，他所提出的直接民主制度更對後世有深遠的影響，於是本文乃以帕特曼、柯爾、巴勃等參與民主理論家為例，觀察盧梭理論對他們的可能影響，並冀望工作場所民主、基爾特社會主義藍圖、強民主制度等各種形式的參與民主體制，能夠讓習於代議民主制度的現代人思考是否可能採行另一種關心更多、參與更多的政治體制。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Direct democracy and representative democracy are definitely in the extreme ends of the political spectrum, when talking to the imagination about political institutions. Due to the complexities and amounts of public affair, representative democracy becomes the most popular political institution. However, when representative democracy is over-developed, the ignorance of public actions is not only retarded the self-development of citizens, but also harmful to the stability of the political institutions.
Among the critics of representative democracy, Jean-Jacques Rousseau is the most outstanding one. His direct democracy greatly influence latter scholars and politicians. So I try to observe the political theories of G. D. H. Cole, Carole Pateman and Benjamin Barber, to see how and to what degree they are influenced by Rousseau. Hoping these forms of participatory democracy: workplace democracy, Guild Socialism and Strong Democracy, can inspire modern people to think about a kind of different political institution which can allow citizens to care more, participate more. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-20T20:02:57Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-98-R94322013-1.pdf: 2372173 bytes, checksum: 7bb70cd87a2eb974aea67e85913501c8 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2009 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員審定書
誌謝 中文摘要 英文摘要 第一章緒論 1 一、研究動機的形成背景 1 二、問題意識 4 三、研究目的 7 四、章節安排 8 第二章 盧梭政治思想的最終目的 10 一、獨立、自由而快樂的自然人 11 二、一種像結合前一樣自由的結合形式 15 三、主權者展現意志的公民大會 20 四、小結 28 第三章 柯爾的基爾特社會主義藍圖 31 一、盧梭在現代的信徒？ 31 二、基爾特社會主義藍圖 33 三、柯爾與盧梭的理論關連 50 第四章 承先啟後的參與民主理論家：帕特曼 55 一、帕特曼之於參與民主理論 55 二、帕特曼與盧梭的理論關連 59 三、南斯拉夫的公民自我管理 67 四、小結 76 第五章 巴勃的強民主理論與制度 79 一、自由主義民主制度（弱民主） 80 二、統合民主 85 三、強民主理論、制度 89 四、巴勃與盧梭的理論關連 104 第六章 結論 107 參考文獻 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.title | 盧梭思想對當代參與民主理論的啟發：以柯爾、帕特曼及巴勃的理論為分析對象 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The Inspiration of Rousseau’s Political Theory to Modern Participatory Democracy Theory: the Analysis of Cole, Pateman, and Barber’s Political Theory | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 97-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 蕭高彥,蔡英文 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 盧梭,參與民主,自我管理,政治功效意識,基爾特社會主義,強民主, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Rousseau,Participatory Democracy,Self-management,Political Efficacy,Guild Socialism,Strong Democracy, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 118 | |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2009-08-19 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 政治學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 政治學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-98-1.pdf | 2.32 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。