請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/88655完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 謝吉隆 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Ji-Lung Hsieh | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 麻愷晅 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Kai-Hsuan Ma | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-08-15T17:14:28Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2023-11-09 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2023-08-15 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2023 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2023-08-05 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | 王惠（2005）。從構式語法理論看漢語詞義研究。中文計算語言學期刊，10(4)，495-507。https://doi.org/10.30019/IJCLCLP.200512.0007
江靜之（2013）。政治候選人電視專訪之報紙新聞引述分析：以台灣四大報為例。新聞學研究，114，79-125。https://doi.org/10.30386/MCR.201301_(114).0003 呂苡榕（2015年10月16日）。「即時新聞」成癮 台灣媒體慢性自殺。端傳媒。https://theinitium.com/article/20151019-taiwan-InstantNews02/ 林宇玲（2020）。使用者自製內容對報紙報導選舉新聞的影響 ： 以 2016 年台灣總統大選為例。資訊社會研究，39，29-69。https://doi.org/10.29843/JCCIS.202007_(39).0003 洪詩楣（2009）。以框架理論為本之漢語情緒動詞詞彙語意分類研究。﹝碩士論文。國立交通大學﹞臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。 https://hdl.handle.net/11296/bnt72y 郭宇璇（2022年10月27日）。數位平台崛起 紙媒近10年營收減半 學者盼推公平議價模式。卓越新聞電子報。https://www.feja.org.tw/66692 黃哲斌（2015年11月1日）。黃哲斌：台媒嚴冬，萬一不見望春風？。端傳媒。https://theinitium.com/article/20151031-opinion-huangzhebin-03-twmedia/ 翁秀琪、鍾蔚文、簡妙如、邱承君（1999）。似假還真的新聞文本世界：新聞如何呈現超經驗事件。新聞學研究，58，59-83。https://doi.org/10.30386/MCR.199901_(58).0003 陳世榮（2015）。社會科學研究中的文字探勘應用：以文意為基礎的文件分類及其問題。人文及社會科學集刊，27(4)，683-718。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Publication/alDetailedMesh?DocID=1018189X-201512-201512280001-201512280001-683-718 陳煜（2018）。網媒環境下綜合報導工作者的角色認同與價值體現研究〔碩士論文。國立臺灣師範大學〕華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Publication/alDetailedMesh?docid=U0021-G060488009I 陳嘉怡（2022年9月21日）。數位平台崛起！近10年報紙雜誌發行量腰斬 新聞業備受衝擊。自由時報。https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/life/breakingnews/4065672 彭慧明（2016）。速度對新聞專業的衝擊：即時新聞現象的討論。〔博士論文。世新大學〕臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/dun593 楊意菁（2013）。網路意見的新聞再現與公眾想像:「網友說」新聞的內容與論述分析。中華傳播學刊，24，119-164。https://doi.org/10.6195/cjcr.2013.24.04 劉昌德（2020）。小編新聞學：社群媒體與通訊軟體如何轉化新聞專業。新聞學研究，142，1-58。https://doi.org/10.30386/MCR.202001_(142).0001 劉慧雯（2014）「網友」作為消息來源: 探討數位時代中電視新聞製作的實質秩序。廣播與電視，36，37-68。https://doi.org/10.30385/JRTS.201406_(36).0002 劉蕙苓（2014）。匯流下的變貌：網路素材使用對電視新聞常規的影響。新聞學研究，121，41-87。https://doi.org/10.30386/MCR.201410_(121).0002 劉蕙苓、羅文輝（2017）。數位匯流的新工具採納記者的社群媒體使用與影響評價。新聞學研究，132，107-150。https://doi.org/10.30386/MCR.201707_(132).0003 蔡榮豐（2018）。網路廣告模式下的台灣新聞網站：新聞生產流程影響探究〔碩士論文。國立臺灣師範大學〕華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6345/THE.NTNU.GMC.007.2018.F05 簡蔓婷（2016）。動詞語意及跨框架互動：以中文溝通評論動詞為例。〔碩士論文。國立交通大學〕臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/ur36mt Bakker, P. (2012). Aggregation, content farms and Huffinization: The rise of low-pay and no-pay journalism. Journalism practice, 6(5-6), 627-637. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2012.667266 Bane, K. C. (2019). Tweeting the agenda: How print and alternative web-only news organizations use Twitter as a source. Journalism Practice, 13(2), 191-205. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2017.1413587 Beckers, K. (2017). How Ordinary is the Ordinary (Wo)man on the Street? Journalism Practice, 11(8), 1026-1041. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2016.1223551 Beckers, K., & Harder, R. A. (2016). “TWITTER JUST EXPLODED” Social media as alternative vox pop. Digital Journalism, 4(7), 910-920. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2016.1161493 Bouvier, G. (2019). How journalists source trending social media feeds: A critical discourse perspective on Twitter. Journalism Studies, 20(2), 212-231. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2017.1365618 Broersma, M., & Graham, T. (2013). Twitter as a news source: How Dutch and British newspapers used tweets in their news coverage, 2007–2011. Journalism practice, 7(4), 446-464. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2013.802481 Bruns, A. (2018). Gatewatching and News Curation. New York, United States of America: Peter Lang Verlag. Bruno, N. (2011). Tweet first, verify later? How real-time information is changing the coverage of worldwide crisis events. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. Retrieved from https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/our-research/tweet-first-verify-later-how-real-time-information-changing-coverage-worldwide-crisis. Calsamiglia, H., & Ferrero, C. L. (2003). Role and position of scientific voices: Reported speech in the media. Discourse Studies, 5(2), 147-173. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445603005002308 Caldas-Coulthard, C. R.(1992). Reporting speech in narrative discourse: Stylistic and ideological implications. Ilha do Desterro, 27, 67-82. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Reporting-speech-in-narrative-discourse%3A-stylistic-Caldas-Coulthard/c6c421127cfc47e765b5c99a7a2fb7164b018d8a Cushion, S. (2018). Using public opinion to serve journalistic narratives: Rethinking vox pops and live two-way reporting in five UK election campaigns (2009–2017). European Journal of Communication, 33(6), 639-656. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323118793779 De Swert, K., & Kuypers, I. (2020). Ordinary People Regularly Reported? Looking for Patterns in the Presence of Ordinary Citizens in Television News in 20 European Countries. Journalism Studies, 21(8), 1037-1054. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2020.1745664 Goode, L. (2009). Social news, citizen journalism and democracy. New Media & Society, 11(8), 1287–1305. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444809341393 Gruber, H. (1993). Evaluation devices in newspaper reports. Journal of Pragmatics, 19(5), 469-486. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(93)90006-B Haapanen, L., & Perrin, D. (2017). Media and quoting : understanding the purposes, roles, and processes of quoting and social media. In C. Cotter & D. Perrin (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of language and media (pp. 424–441). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315673134-31 Harrison, J. (2010). User-generated content and gatekeeping at the BBC hub. Journalism studies, 11(2), 243-256. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700903290593 Harkin, J., Anderson, K., Morgan, L., & Smith, B. (2012). Deciphering user-generated content in transitional societies: A Syria coverage case study. Internews Network. Retrieved from https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Deciphering-User-Generated-Content-in-Transitional-Harkin-Anderson/0b6e9fda0dc096bc7f5384255dfed6e55d6071f0 Hermida, A., & Thurman, N. (2008). A clash of cultures: The integration of user-generated content within professional journalistic frameworks at British newspaper websites. Journalism practice, 2(3), 343-356. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2012.714935 Hermida, A. (2010). Twittering the news: The emergence of ambient journalism. Journalism practice, 4(3), 297-308.https://doi.org/10.1080/17512781003640703 Hermida, A. (2012). Tweets and truth: Journalism as a discipline of collaborative verification. Journalism Practice, 6(5-6), 659-668. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2012.667269 Hermida, A. (2015). Nothing but the truth. In M. Carlson & S.C. Lewis (Eds.) , Boundaries of Journalism: Professionalism, Practices and Participation (1st ed., pp.37-50). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315727684 Huang, C.-R., & Hsieh, S.-K. (2010). Infrastructure for Cross-lingual Knowledge Representation ─ Towards Multilingualism in Linguistic Studies. Taiwan NSC-granted Research Project (NSC 96-2411-H-003-061-MY3) Jenkins, H., & Deuze, M. (2008). Convergence culture. Convergence, 14(1), 5-12. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856507084415 Johnston, L. (2016). Social News = Journalism Evolution? Digital Journalism, 4(7), 899-909.https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2016.1168709 Karlsson, M. (2010). Rituals of transparency: Evaluating online news outlets' uses of transparency rituals in the United States, United Kingdom and Sweden. Journalism studies, 11(4), 535-545. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616701003638400 Kleemans, M., Schaap, G., & Hermans, L. (2017). Citizen sources in the news: Above and beyond the vox pop? Journalism, 18(4), 464-481. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884915620206 Lee, G. (2017). Verb objectivity and source qualification: Comparison of quotation attributions in offline and online newspapers. Journalism, 18(7), 890-906. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884916636175 Lewis, J., Williams, A. E., Franklin, R. A., Thomas, J., & Mosdell, N. (2008). The quality and independence of British journalism. Retrieved from https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/18439/1/Quality%20&%20Independence%20of%20British%20Journalism.pdf Lewis, S. C. (2012). The tension between professional control and open participation: Journalism and its boundaries. Information, communication & society, 15(6), 836-866. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.674150 McGregor, S. C. (2019). Social media as public opinion: How journalists use social media to represent public opinion. Journalism, 20(8), 1070–1086. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884919845458 Naab, T. K., & Sehl, A. (2017). Studies of user-generated content: A systematic review. Journalism, 18(10), 1256-1273. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884916673557 Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Schulz, A., Andi, S., Robertson, C. T., & Nielsen, R. (2021). Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2021. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. Retrieved from https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2021-06/Digital_News_Report_2021_FINAL.pdf Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Robertson, C. T., Eddy, K., & Nielsen, R. (2022). Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2022. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. Retrieved from https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2022-06/Digital_News-Report_2022.pdf Obiedat, N. (2006). The pragma-ideological implications of using reported speech: The case of reporting on the al-aqsa intifada. Pragmatics, 16(2-3), 275-304. https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.16.2-3.03obi O'Reilly, T. (2005, September 30). Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software. O'Reilly. https://www.oreilly.com/pub/a/web2/archive/what-is-web-20.html Paulussen, S., & Ugille, P. (2008). User generated content in the newsroom: Professional and organisational constraints on participatory journalism. Westminster papers in communication & culture, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.16997/wpcc.63 Paulussen, S., & Harder, R. A. (2014) Social Media References in Newspapers. Journalism Practice, 8(5), 542-551.https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2014.894327 Peter, C., & Zerback, T. (2020). Ordinary Citizens in the News: A Conceptual Framework. Journalism Studies, 21(8), 1003-1016. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2020.1758190 Quandt, T. (2018). Dark participation. Media and communication, 6(4), 36-48. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v6i4.1519 Singer, J. B. (2010). Quality control: Perceived effects of user-generated content on newsroom norms, values and routines. Journalism practice, 4(2), 127-142. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512780903391979 Saridou, T., Spyridou, L. P., & Veglis, A. (2017). Churnalism on the rise? Assessing convergence effects on editorial practices. Digital Journalism, 5(8), 1006-1024. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2017.1342209 Tereszkiewicz, A. (2014). “I’m not sure what that means yet, but we’ll soon find out”–the discourse of newspaper live blogs. Studia Linguistica Universitatis Iagellonicae Cracoviensis, 131(3), 299-319. https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=270309 Tenenboim-Weinblatt, K., & Baden, C. (2018). Journalistic transformation: How source texts are turned into news stories. Journalism, 19(4), 481–499. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884916667873 Thurman, N., & Walters, A. (2013). Live blogging–digital journalism’s pivotal platform? Digital journalism, 1(1), 82-101. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2012.714935 Tong, J. (2015). Chinese journalists' views of user-generated content producers and journalism: a case study of the boundary work of journalism. Asian Journal of Communication, 25(6), 600-616. https://doi.org/10.1080/01292986.2015.1019526 Tuchman, G. (1972). Objectivity as strategic ritual: An examination of newsmen's notions of objectivity. American Journal of sociology, 77(4), 660-679. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2776752 Wahl-Jorgensen, K. (2015). Resisting epistemologies of user-generated content? Cooptation, segregation and the boundaries of journalism. In M. Carlson & S.C. Lewis (Eds.) , Boundaries of Journalism: Professionalism, Practices and Participation (1st ed., pp. 169-185). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315727684 Waugh, L. (1995). Reported speech in journalistic discourse: The relation of function and text. Text & Talk, 15(1), 129-173. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1995.15.1.129 Wei, W. J., & Chen, K. J. (1991, August). 連接詞的語法表達模式-以中文訊息格位語法 (ICG) 為本的表達形式 (The Grammar Representation of Conjunctions–a Representation Based on ICG)[In Chinese]. In Proceedings of Rocling IV Computational Linguistics Conference IV (pp. 79-95). https://aclanthology.org/O91-1001/ Welbers, K., van Atteveldt, W., Kleinnijenhuis, J., Ruigrok, N., & Schaper, J. (2016). News selection criteria in the digital age: Professional norms versus online audience metrics. Journalism, 17(8), 1037–1053. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884915595474 White, P. (2012). Exploring the axiological workings of 'reporter voice' news stories-Attribution and attitudinal positioning. Discourse, Context and Media, 1(2-3), 57-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2012.10.004 Williams, A., Wardle, C., & Wahl-Jorgensen, K. (2011). “Have they got news for us?” Audience revolution or business as usual at the BBC? Journalism practice, 5(1), 85-99. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512781003670031 Zelizer, B. (1995). Text, Talk, and Journalistic Quoting Practices. The Communication Review, 1(1), 33-51. https://doi.org/10.1080/10714429509388250 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/88655 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 以直接引句呈現受訪者言論，是傳統新聞媒體維繫儀式性客觀的方式。如今，傳統媒體將重心轉往網路，為了追求即時性和點閱，使用者生產內容成為媒體常用的素材，然而，媒體卻很少核實使用者生產內容的真偽。面對查證實務鬆動的問題，以直接引句呈現使用者生產內容成為媒體的策略，並藉由預備框架，即引號前的論述，交代消息來源、說明對消息的疑慮。但如同採訪報導中會透過預備框架詮釋受訪者言論，增添故事性，媒體也可能運用預備框架，對使用者生產內容作出額外的詮釋。為了解臺灣網路新聞如何用預備框架呈現使用者生產內容，本研究盤點預備框架論述中會出現的角色詞、角色數量修飾詞、修飾語以及動詞，探究媒體針對預備框架的應用，以及不同類型媒體、新聞從業人員是否在預備框架的應用上有差異。
本研究立意蒐集《聯合新聞網》、《ETtoday新聞雲》和《TVBS新聞網》三家媒體2022年6月至12月間的網路新聞文本。透過正規表達式取出與引號相接的句子，並再透過正規表達式提取預備框架此種由角色詞、角色數量修飾詞、修飾語、平衡功能用語、動詞性表達組成的構式。研究結果發現，預備框架中「網友」一詞最常出現，且媒體較不常採用角色數量修飾詞，若使用，則以群體特性的修飾詞佔多數。動詞的使用以性質中立的引述類動詞佔最多。本研究也比較傳統媒體與網路原生媒體，記者與編輯針對預備框架的應用，結果顯示不同類型的媒體、新聞工作者確實存在應用上的差異。本研究剖析臺灣網路新聞針對使用者生產內容的引述策略，並為此種涉及使用者生產內容的預備框架論述，建立可操作性定義，供後續研究使用。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Presenting interviewees' remarks in direct quotes is a way for traditional news media to maintain rituals of objectivity. Nowadays, media shifts its focus to online websites. In order to pursue immediacy and click-through rates, user-generated content has become a common source. However, media often fail to verify the authenticity of user-generated content. Facing the problem of loose verification, using direct quotations to present user-generated content has become a strategy employed by the media. Media also use preparatory frames, the discourse preceding the quotation marks, to show where the content came from and the unreliability of the content. Yet, just as interview reports use preparatory frames to interpret the interviewee's remarks to make news stories more appealing, the media may also use preparatory frames to make additional interpretations of user-generated content.
In order to understand how Taiwan online news employs preparatory frames to present user-generated content, this study takes an inventory of the role terms, modifiers for the number of role, modifiers, words used for balancing opinion and verbal expression that appear in the discourse of preparatory frames. The study aims to explore the application of preparatory frames by the media, as well as any differences in their usage among different types of media and news practitioners. This study collected online news texts from United Daily News online, TVBS News online, ETtoday online, from June to December 2022. Through regular expressions, sentences connected to quotation marks were extracted, and further regular expressions were employed to extract preparatory frames, the constructions that composed of role terms, modifiers for the number of role, modifiers and verbs. The findings reveal that the role term "wang you" appears most frequently. Also, media are less inclined to use modifiers for the number of role, if used, majority of the modifiers are related to collective characteristics. The use of neutral verbs dominates the discourse. This study also compares traditional media with online native media, and reporters with editors. The results indicate differences in the application of preparatory frames among different types of media and news practitioners. This study analyzes the quotation strategies employed by Taiwan online news regarding user-generated content and establishes an operational definition for the discourse of preparatory frames concerning user-generated content, providing a foundation for future studies in this area. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2023-08-15T17:14:28Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2023-08-15T17:14:28Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 誌謝 i
中文摘要 ii Abstract iv 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景 1 第二節 研究目的與研究問題 6 第二章 文獻回顧 10 第一節 網路新聞產製與使用者生產內容 10 第二節 直接引句與預備框架之功能 15 第三節 預備框架之組成 19 第四節 小結 25 第三章 研究方法 26 第一節 研究設計 26 第二節 研究流程 33 第四章 研究結果 38 第一節 預備框架之樣貌 38 第二節 不同類型新聞媒體之比較 63 第三節 不同類型新聞工作者之比較 67 第四節 臺灣網路新聞針對使用者生產內容之預備框架應用 69 第五章 研究結論與建議 71 參考文獻 80 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.subject | 預備框架 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 網路新聞 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 社群媒體 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 使用者生產內容 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 直接引句 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Social Media | en |
| dc.subject | Online News | en |
| dc.subject | Preparatory Frame | en |
| dc.subject | Direct quotation | en |
| dc.subject | User-generated content | en |
| dc.title | 網路新聞針對使用者生產內容之預備框架應用 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | How Online News Use Preparatory Frame toward User-generated Content | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 111-2 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 謝舒凱;鄧志松 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Shu-Kai Hsieh;Chih-Sung Teng | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 網路新聞,社群媒體,使用者生產內容,直接引句,預備框架, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Online News,Social Media,User-generated content,Direct quotation,Preparatory Frame, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 86 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202302526 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(限校園內公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2023-08-08 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 新聞研究所 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 新聞研究所 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-111-2.pdf 授權僅限NTU校內IP使用（校園外請利用VPN校外連線服務） | 3.28 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。