請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/8849
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 蔡向榮(Hsiang-Jung Tsai) | |
dc.contributor.author | Huang-Chi Huang | en |
dc.contributor.author | 黃凰綺 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-20T20:02:33Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2010-09-02 | |
dc.date.available | 2021-05-20T20:02:33Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2009-09-02 | |
dc.date.issued | 2009 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2009-08-19 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 1. 王裕智。臺灣屠體沙門氏桿菌流行病學及抗藥性研究。碩士論文,中興大學獸醫公共衛生學研究所,臺中,臺灣。2004。
2. 向璧鴻。臺灣地區鴨隻沙氏桿菌、彎曲桿菌盛行率暨葯物感受性調查。碩士論文,臺灣大學獸醫學研究所,臺北,臺灣。2001。 3. 行政院農業委員會。農業產銷工作手冊。臺北,臺灣;1994年:90。 4. 李宗賢。臺灣沙門氏桿菌症的流行病學:由環境、食用豬畜產品到人。碩士論文,中興大學獸醫公共衛生學研究所,臺中,臺灣。2006。 5. 廖志偉。臺灣中部地區流浪犬及家犬沙門氏桿菌感染之研究。碩士論文,中興大學獸醫公共衛生學研究所,臺中,臺灣。2007。 6. 郭俊緯。傳統市場與屠宰場仿土雞沙門氏桿菌污染之調查研究。碩士論文,中興大學獸醫病理學研究所,臺中,臺灣。2006。 7. 陳怡君。沙門氏桿菌抗藥性基因型之分析。碩士論文,屏東科技大學獸醫學系所,屏東,臺灣。2007。 8. 陳秀芬。以脈衝式電泳分析犬沙門氏桿菌之流行病學研究。碩士論文,屏東科技大學獸醫學系所,屏東,臺灣。2007。 9. 陳俊宇。臺灣地區爬蟲類寵物沙門氏桿菌感染之流行病學研究。碩士論文,中興大學獸醫公共衛生學研究所,臺中,臺灣。2005。 10. 蔡宇馨。中部地區產蛋雞與帶殼蛋之沙門氏桿菌監測調查。碩士論文,中興大學獸醫公共衛生學研究所,臺中,臺灣。2007。 11. 蔡文城。實用臨床微生物診斷學。臺北;九州圖書文物有限公司;2006年:707-708。 12. 沈添富。家禽的營養與需要。畜牧要覽家禽篇(增修版)。中國畜牧學會。臺北,臺灣;2001年:167。 13. Aarestrup, F. M., Hendriksen, R. S., Lockett, J. & other authors (2007). International spread of multidrug-resistant Salmonellae Schwarzengrund in food products. Emerg Infect Dis 13, 726-731. 14. Ahmer, B. M., Tran, M. & Heffron, F. (1999). The virulence plasmid of Salmonellae typhimurium is self-transmissible. J Bacteriol 181, 1364-1368. 15. Amavisit, P., Lightfoot, D., Browning, G. F. & Markham, P. F. (2003). Variation between pathogenic serovars within Salmonellae pathogenicity islands. J Bacteriol 185, 3624-3635. 16. Altekruse, S. F., Bauer, N., Chanlongbutra, A., DeSagun, R., Naugle, A., Schlosser, W., Umholtz, R. & White, P. (2006). Salmonellae enteritidis in broiler chickens, United States, 2000-2005. Emerg Infect Dis 12, 1848-1852. 17. Alvarez, J., Porwollik, S., Laconcha, I. & other authors (2003). Detection of a Salmonellae enterica serovar California strain spreading in spanish feed mills and genetic characterization with DNA microarrays. Appl Environ Microbiol 69, 7531-7534. 18. Angen, O., Skov, MN., Chriel, M., Agger, JF., Bisgaard M. (1996). A retrospective study on Salmonellae infection in Danish broiler flocks. Prev Vet Med 26, 223-237. 19. Arsenault, J., Letellier, A., Quessy, S., Normand, V. & Boulianne, M. (2007). Prevalence and risk factors for Salmonellae spp. and Campylobacter spp. caecal colonization in broiler chicken and turkey flocks slaughtered in Quebec, Canada. Prev Vet Med 81, 250-264. 20. Asai, T., Ishihara K., Harada K., Kojima A., Tamura Y., Sato S., Takahashi T. (2007). Long-term prevalence of antimicrobial-resistant Salmonellae enterica subspecies enterica serovar Infantis in the broiler chicken industry in Japan. Microbiol Immunol 51, 111-115 21. Bhargava KK, O'Neil JB, Prior MG, Dunkelgod KE.(1983). Incidence of Salmonellae contamination in broiler chickens in Saskatchewan. Can J Comp Med. 47,27-32. 22. Baumler, A. J., Hargis, B. M. & Tsolis, R. M. (2000). Tracing the origins of Salmonellae outbreaks. Science 287, 50-52. 23. Blanc-Potard, A. B., Solomon, F., Kayser, J. & Groisman, E. A. (1999). The SPI-3 pathogenicity island of Salmonellae enterica. J Bacteriol 181, 998-1004. 24. Boqvist, S., Hansson, I., Nord Bjerselius, U., Hamilton, C., Wahlstrom, H., Noll, B., Tysen, E. & Engvall, A. (2003). Salmonellae isolated from animals and feed production in Sweden between 1993 and 1997. Acta Vet Scand 44, 181-197. 25. (CDC, 2007). Three outbreaks of salmonellosis associated with baby poultry from three hatcheries--United States, 2006. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 56, 273-276. 26. Chen, T. H., Wang, Y. C., Chen, Y. T., Yang, C. H. & Yeh, K. S. (2006). Serotype occurrence and antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonellae isolates recovered from pork carcasses in Taiwan (2000 through 2003). J Food Prot 69, 674-678. 27. Chittick, P., Sulka, A., Tauxe, R. V. & Fry, A. M. (2006). A summary of national reports of foodborne outbreaks of Salmonellae Heidelberg infections in the United States: clues for disease prevention. J Food Prot 69, 1150-1153. 28. Cogan, T. A. & Humphrey, T. J. (2003). The rise and fall of Salmonellae Enteritidis in the UK. J Appl Microbiol 94 Suppl, 114S-119S. 29. Collazo, C. M. & Galan, J. E. (1997). The invasion-associated type-III protein secretion system in Salmonellae--a review. Gene 192, 51-59. 30. Cardinale, E., Tall, F., Gueye, E. F., Cisse, M. & Salvat, G. (2004). Risk factors for Salmonellae enterica subsp. enterica infection in senegalese broiler-chicken flocks. Prev Vet Med 63, 151-161. 31. Cardinale, E., Perrier Gros-Claude, J. D., Rivoal, K., Rose, V., Tall, F., Mead, G. C. & Salvat, G. (2005). Epidemiological analysis of Salmonellae enterica ssp. enterica serovars Hadar, Brancaster and Enteritidis from humans and broiler chickens in Senegal using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and antibiotic susceptibility. J Appl Microbiol 99, 968-977. 32. Carr, L. E., Mallinson, E. T., Tate, C. R., Miller, R. G., Russek-Cohen, E., Stewart, L. E., Opara, O. O. & Joseph, S. W. (1995). Prevalence of Salmonellae in broiler flocks: effect of litter water activity, house construction, and watering devices. Avian Dis 39, 39-44. 33. Chadfield, M., Skov, M., Christensen, J., Madsen, M., Bisgaard, M., (2001). An epidemiological study of Salmonellae enterica serovar 4, 12:b: in broiler chicken in Denmark. Vet. Microbiol. 82 (3), 233–247. 34. Chambers, J.R., Bisaillon, J.R., Labbe, Y., Poppe, C., Langford, C.F., (1998). Salmonellae prevalence in crops of Ontario and Quebec broiler chicken at slaughter. Poult. Sci. 77, 1497–1501. 35. Cheong, H. J., Lee, Y. J., Hwang, I. S. & other authors (2007). Characteristics of non-typhoidal Salmonellae isolates from human and broiler-chickens in southwestern Seoul, Korea. J Korean Med Sci 22, 773-778. 36. Craven, S. E., Stern, N. J., Line, E., Bailey, J. S., Cox, N. A. & Fedorka-Cray, P. (2000). Determination of the incidence of Salmonellae spp., Campylobacter jejuni, and Clostridium perfringens in wild birds near broiler chicken houses by sampling intestinal droppings. Avian Dis 44, 715-720. 37. Crump, J. A., Griffin, P. M. & Angulo, F. J. (2002). Bacterial contamination of animal feed and its relationship to human foodborne illness. Clin Infect Dis 35, 859-865. 38. Davies, R.H., Nicholas, R.A.J., Mclaren, I.M., Corkish, J.D., Lanning, D.G., Wray, C., (1997). Bacteriological and serological investigation of persistent Salmonellae enteritidis infection in an integrated poultry organisation. Vet. Microbiol. 58 (2–4), 277–293. 39. Davies, R., Breslin, M., Corry, J.E., Hudson, W., Allen, V.M., (2001). Observations on the distribution and control of Salmonellae species in two integrated broiler companies. Vet. Rec. 149 (8), 227–232. 40. Davies, R. H. & Wray, C. (1997). Distribution of Salmonellae contamination in ten animal feedmills. Vet Microbiol 57, 159-169. 41. Durand, A. M., Giesecke, W. H., Barnard, M. L., van der Walt, M. L. & Steyn, H. C. (1990). Salmonellae isolated from feeds and feed ingredients during the period 1982-1988: animal and public health implications. Onderstepoort J Vet Res 57, 175-181. 42. ( FDA, 1994). FDA clarifies policy on Salmonellaee in feed, holds workshop on anti-Salmonellae additives. J Am Vet Med Assoc 205, 1088. 43. de Jong, B. & Ekdahl, K. (2006). The comparative burden of salmonellosis in the European Union member states, associated and candidate countries. BMC Public Health 6, 4. 44. Eriksson, J., Lofstrom, C., Aspan, A., Gunnarsson, A., Karlsson, I., Borch, E., de Jong, B. & Radstrom, P. (2005). Comparison of genotyping methods by application to Salmonellae livingstone strains associated with an outbreak of human salmonellosis. Int J Food Microbiol 104, 93-103. 45. Fris, C. & van den Bos, J. (1995). A retrospective case-control study of risk factors associated with Salmonellae enterica subsp. Enterica serovar Enteritidis infections on Dutch broiler breeder farms. Avian Pathol 24, 255-272. 46. Foley, S. L. & Lynne, A. M. (2007). Food animal-associated Salmonellae challenges: pathogenicity and antimicrobial resistance. J Anim Sci. 47. Foley, S. L., Lynne, A. M. & Nayak, R. (2007). Salmonellae challenges: prevalence in swine and poultry and potential pathogenicity of such isolates. J Anim Sci. 48. Gast, R. K., Guard-Bouldin, J. & Holt, P. S. (2004). Colonization of reproductive organs and internal contamination of eggs after experimental infection of laying hens with Salmonellae heidelberg and Salmonellae enteritidis. Avian Dis 48, 863-869. 49. Gast, R. K., Guard-Bouldin, J. & Holt, P. S. (2005). The relationship between the duration of fecal shedding and the production of contaminated eggs by laying hens infected with strains of Salmonellae enteritidis and Salmonellae Heidelberg. Avian Dis 49, 382-386. 50. Gradel, K. O. & Rattenborg, E. (2003). A questionnaire-based, retrospective field study of persistence of Salmonellae Enteritidis and Salmonellae Typhimurium in Danish broiler houses. Prev Vet Med 56, 267-284. 51. Giurov, B. & Vodas, K. (1987). [Potential manifestation of fowl typhoid in chicks fed Salmonellae gallinarum-contaminated feed]. Vet Med Nauki 24, 33-37. 52. Gupta, S., Maiden, M. C., Feavers, I. M., Nee, S., May, R. M. & Anderson, R. M. (1996). The maintenance of strain structure in populations of recombining infectious agents. Nat Med 2, 437-442. 53. Hall, P., Barr, K. & Lacey, R. W. (1990). Failure of Salkil to eliminate Salmonellae from chicken feed. Vet Rec 126, 297. 54. Hansen-Wester, I. & Hensel, M. (2001). Salmonellae pathogenicity islands encoding type III secretion systems. Microbes Infect 3, 549-559. 55. Hedberg, C. W., Angulo, F. J., White, K. E. & other authors (1999). Outbreaks of salmonellosis associated with eating uncooked tomatoes: implications for public health. The Investigation Team. Epidemiol Infect 122, 385-393. 56. Himathongkham, S., Pereira, M. G. & Riemann, H. (1996). Heat destruction of Salmonellae in poultry feed: effect of time, temperature, and moisture. Avian Dis 40, 72-77. 57. Hinton, M. & Linton, A. H. (1988). Control of Salmonellae infections in broiler chickens by the acid treatment of their feed. Vet Rec 123, 416-421. 58. Hinton, M. H. (2000). Infections and intoxications associated with animal feed and forage which may present a hazard to human health. Vet J 159, 124-138. 59. Hoszowski, A. & Truszczynski, M. (1995). Choice of the optimal method for the isolation of Salmonellae from meat- and bone powder designed for industrial feed mixtures. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis 18, 227-237. 60. Hsu, F. S., Chuech, L. L. & Shen, Y. M. (1983). Isolation, serotyping and drug resistance of Salmonellaee in scouring pigs in Taiwan. Zhonghua Min Guo Wei Sheng Wu Ji Mian Yi Xue Za Zhi 16, 283-290. 61. Hummel, P. H., Su, J. F., Chiu, T. C. & Chen, Y. S. (1978). Survey of Salmonellaee in mesenteric lymph nodes, gallbladder wall and jejunum from healthy pigs slaughtered in Taiwan. Zhonghua Min Guo Wei Sheng Wu Xue Za Zhi 11, 93-98. 62. Kennedy, M., Villar, R., Vugia, D. J. & other authors (2004). Hospitalizations and deaths due to Salmonellae infections, FoodNet, 1996-1999. Clin Infect Dis 38 Suppl 3, S142-148. 63. Kangas, S., Lyytikainen, T., Peltola, J., Ranta, J. & Maijala, R. (2007). Costs of two alternative Salmonellae control policies in Finnish broiler production. Acta Vet Scand 49, 35. 64. Kim, A., Lee, Y. J., Kang, M. S., Kwag, S. I. & Cho, J. K. (2007). Dissemination and tracking of Salmonellae spp. in integrated broiler operation. J Vet Sci 8, 155-161. 65. Koyuncu, S. and P. Haggblom (2009). A comparative study of cultural methods for the detection of Salmonellae in feed and feed ingredients. BMC Vet Res 5: 6. 66. Limawongpranee, S., Hayashidani, H., Okatani, A. T., Ono, K., Hirota, C., Kaneko, K. & Ogawa, M. (1999). Prevalence and persistence of Salmonellae in broiler chicken flocks. J Vet Med Sci 61, 255-259. 67. Lauderdale, T. L., Aarestrup, F. M., Chen, P. C., Lai, J. F., Wang, H. Y., Shiau, Y. R., Huang, I. W. & Hung, C. L. (2006). Multidrug resistance among different serotypes of clinical Salmonellae isolates in Taiwan. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 55, 149-155. 68. Limawongpranee, S., Hayashidani, H., Okatani, A. T., Ono, K., Hirota, C., Kaneko, K. & Ogawa, M. (1999). Prevalence and persistence of Salmonellae in broiler chicken flocks. J Vet Med Sci 61, 255-259. 69. Lofstrom, C., R. Knutsson, et al. (2004). Rapid and specific detection of Salmonellae spp. in animal feed samples by PCR after culture enrichment. Appl Environ Microbiol 70(1): 69-75. 70. Jones, F. T. & Richardson, K. E. (2004). Salmonellae in commercially manufactured feeds. Poult Sci 83, 384-391. 71. June, G. A., Sherrod, P. S., Hammack, T. S., Amaguana, R. M. & Andrews, W. H. (1996). Relative effectiveness of selenite cystine broth, tetrathionate broth, and rappaport-vassiliadis medium for recovery of Salmonellae spp. from raw flesh, highly contaminated foods, and poultry feed: collaborative study. J AOAC Int 79, 1307-1323. 72. Muller, K. H., Collinson, S. K., Trust, T. J. & Kay, W. W. (1991). Type 1 fimbriae of Salmonellae enteritidis. J Bacteriol 173, 4765-4772. 73. Murase, T., Fujimoto, K., Nakayama, R. & Otsuki, K. (2006). Multiplication and motility of Salmonellae enterica serovars enteritidis, infantis, and montevideo in in vitro contamination models of eggs. J Food Prot 69, 1012-1016. 74. Nespeca, R., Vaillancourt, J. P. & Morrow, W. E. (1997). Validation of a poultry biosecurity survey. Prev Vet Med 31, 73-86. 75. Nogrady, N., Toth, A., Kostyak, A., Paszti, J. & Nagy, B. (2007). Emergence of multidrug-resistant clones of Salmonellae Infantis in broiler chickens and humans in Hungary. J Antimicrob Chemother 60, 645-648. 76. Peng, C. F. (1992). Incidence and antimicrobial resistance of Salmonellae serotypes in southern Taiwan from 1978 through 1987. Gaoxiong Yi Xue Ke Xue Za Zhi 8, 247-254. 77. Poppe, C., Irwin, R. J., Messier, S., Finley, G. G. & Oggel, J. (1991). The prevalence of Salmonellae enteritidis and other Salmonellae sp. among Canadian registered commercial chicken broiler flocks. Epidemiol Infect 107, 201-211. 78. Poppe, C., Irwin, R. J., Forsberg, C. M., Clarke, R. C. & Oggel, J. (1991a). The prevalence of Salmonellae enteritidis and other Salmonellae spp. among Canadian registered commercial layer flocks. Epidemiol Infect 106, 259-270. 79. Poppe, C., Irwin, R. J., Messier, S., Finley, G. G. & Oggel, J. (1991b). The prevalence of Salmonellae enteritidis and other Salmonellae sp. among Canadian registered commercial chicken broiler flocks. Epidemiol Infect 107, 201-211. 80. Rose, N., Beaudeau, F., Drouin, P., Toux, J. Y., Rose, V. & Colin, P. (1999). Risk factors for Salmonellae enterica subsp. enterica contamination in French broiler-chicken flocks at the end of the rearing period. Prev Vet Med 39, 265-277. 81. Rabsch, W., Hargis, B. M., Tsolis, R. M., Kingsley, R. A., Hinz, K. H., Tschape, H. & Baumler, A. J. (2000). Competitive exclusion of Salmonellae enteritidis by Salmonellae gallinarum in poultry. Emerg Infect Dis 6, 443-448. 82. Slader, J., Domingue, G., Jorgensen, F., McAlpine, K., Owen, R. J., Bolton, F. J. & Humphrey, T. J. (2002). Impact of transport crate reuse and of catching and processing on Campylobacter and Salmonellae contamination of broiler chickens. Appl Environ Microbiol 68, 713-719. 83. Shea, J. E., Hensel, M., Gleeson, C. & Holden, D. W. (1996). Identification of a virulence locus encoding a second type III secretion system in Salmonellae typhimurium. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 93, 2593-2597. 84. Tsai, H. J. & Hsiang, P. H. (2005). The prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibilities of Salmonellae and Campylobacter in ducks in Taiwan. J Vet Med Sci 67, 7-12. 85. Tsai, H. J., Huang, H. C., Lin, C. M., Lien, Y. Y. & Chou, C. H. (2007). Salmonellaee and campylobacters in household and stray dogs in northern Taiwan. Vet Res Commun 31, 931-939. 86. Jacobs-Reitsma, W. F., Bolder, N. M. & Mulder, R. W. (1994). Cecal carriage of Campylobacter and Salmonellae in Dutch broiler flocks at slaughter: a one-year study. Poult Sci 73, 1260-1266. 87. Jones, F. T. & Richardson, K. E. (2004). Salmonellae in commercially manufactured feeds. Poult Sci 83, 384-391. 88. June, G. A., Sherrod, P. S., Hammack, T. S., Amaguana, R. M. & Andrews, W. H. (1996). Relative effectiveness of selenite cystine broth, tetrathionate broth, and rappaport-vassiliadis medium for recovery of Salmonellae spp. from raw flesh, highly contaminated foods, and poultry feed: collaborative study. J AOAC Int 79, 1307-1323. 89. Lound, L., Tanaro, J., De Antoni, G., Ledri, S., Gomez, M. B., Schimpf, M., Cazaux, N. & De Gracia, L. (1998). [Salmonellae: comparison of methods for its detection in bird feed]. Rev Argent Microbiol 30, 180-184. 90. Muhlenberg, W. (1992).Chicken feed contaminated with Salmonellae enteritidis in a small egg-producing farm as source of a chain of infection in man--problems in tracing the mode of transmission. Gesundheitswesen 54, 127-134. 91. Nakamura, M., Nagamine, N., Takahashi, T., Norimatsu, M., Suzuki, S. & Sato, S. (1995). Intratracheal infection of chickens with Salmonellae enteritidis and the effect of feed and water deprivation. Avian Dis 39, 853-858. 92. Rouse, J., Rolow, A. & Nelson, C. E. (1988). Effect of chemical treatment of poultry feed on survival of Salmonellae. Poult Sci 67, 1225-1228. 93. S. Valkenburgh, R. van Oosterom, O. Stenvers, M. Aalten, M. Braks, B. Schimmer, A. van de Giessen, W. van Pelt, M. (2007). Langelaar Zoonoses and Zoonotic Agents in Humans, Food, Animals and Feed in the Netherlands 2003-2006. RIVM-rapportnummer: 330152001 ISBN-13: 978-90-6960-184-7 94. Sadeyen, J. R., Trotereau, J., Velge, P., Marly, J., Beaumont, C., Barrow, P. A., Bumstead, N. & Lalmanach, A. C. (2004). Salmonellae carrier state in chicken: comparison of expression of immune response genes between susceptible and resistant animals. Microbes Infect 6, 1278-1286. 95. Schotte, U., Borchers, D., Wulff, C. & Geue, L. (2007). Salmonellae Montevideo outbreak in military kennel dogs caused by contaminated commercial feed, which was only recognized through monitoring. Vet Microbiol 119, 316-323. 96. Shirota, K., Katoh, H., Ito, T. & Otsuki, K. (2000). Salmonellae contamination in commercial layer feed in Japan. J Vet Med Sci 62, 789-791. 97. Shirota, K., Katoh, H., Murase, T., Ito, T. & Otsuki, K. (2001). Monitoring of layer feed and eggs for Salmonellae in eastern Japan between 1993 and 1998. J Food Prot 64, 734-737. 98. Turcotte, C. & Woodward, M. J. (1993). Cloning, DNA nucleotide sequence and distribution of the gene encoding the SEF14 fimbrial antigen of Salmonellae enteritidis. J Gen Microbiol 139, 1477-1485. 99. van Asten, A. J. & van Dijk, J. E. (2005). Distribution of classic virulence factors among Salmonellae spp. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 44, 251-259. 100. Velge, P., Cloeckaert, A. & Barrow, P. (2005). Emergence of Salmonellae epidemics: the problems related to Salmonellae enterica serotype Enteritidis and multiple antibiotic resistance in other major serotypes. Vet Res 36, 267-288. 101. Vugia, D. J., Samuel, M., Farley, M. M., Marcus, R., Shiferaw, B., Shallow, S., Smith, K. & Angulo, F. J. (2004). Invasive Salmonellae infections in the United States, FoodNet, 1996-1999: incidence, serotype distribution, and outcome. Clin Infect Dis 38 Suppl 3, S149-156. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/8849 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 沙門氏桿菌是重要的人畜共通傳染病原,長久以來家禽被認為是媒介人類感染的主要來源之ㄧ,而白肉雞是消費量最大的肉雞品種,故其飼育過程之管控相當值得關注。為暸解北臺灣白肉雞場污染沙門氏桿菌之風險因子以作為禽場飼養管理之參考,進行以問卷調查及沙門氏桿菌檢測為基礎的病例對照研究,自2008年4月至2009年5月間共調查41個白肉雞場,包括14場開放式與27場水簾式雞場,於各場擇一雞舍調查。經前預備試驗後首度建立適用於北臺灣地區白肉雞場風險因子調查之研究方法,以連續3個時間點採樣並各採集雞隻臟器與飼料進行檢測。結果顯示場陽性率為56.1 % ,且雞場型態對於污染之影響未達顯著差異(p >0.05),經分析得知有10個風險因子雖未達統計學顯著水準,但其勝算比值顯示可能與減少禽場污染有關,包括: (1)水簾式雞舍之型式為一層而非多層;(2)雞場入口具有需以鑰匙開啟之門鎖;(3)當雞隻飲水非自來水但先經處理過再使用;(4)定期清掃雞場內之犬貓糞便;(5)工作人員每天換洗工作服與工作鞋;(6)雞場具有圍牆與外界隔離;(7)進入雞舍前有一獨立之室內空間可供更換工作服與清潔雙手;(8)雛雞運送至雞舍時之容器非重複使用之塑膠籠;(9)雛雞來源為單一種雞場;(10)墊料使用前先移除發霉或結塊部份。另外,臺灣北部之氣候因子可能值得特別注意,本研究結果顯示禽場污染於涼季顯著提高(p <0.05)。 此外,有鑑於遭污染之家禽飼料可於禽場快速地傳播病原,故進行於家禽場進行之飼料採樣調查,並比較不同採樣點與6種培養基搭配組合之分離效果;檢測結果顯示沙門氏桿菌總分離率為7.6 % (59/778)、場陽性率21.4 % (33/154);檢測件共涵括16種商業品牌,陽性檢體集中分離自5品牌。統計分析結果顯示: (1)不同飼料品牌之分離率呈顯著差異;(2)採樣點中最易取得之飼料槽檢體分離結果顯示,白肉雞飼料之分離率顯著高於其他禽種;(3)不分採樣點統計,種雞飼料之污染顯著高於其他飼料;(4)整體而言,禽場飼料分離沙門氏桿菌之培養基分離效果以RVS搭配XLD最佳,RVS搭配CAS居次 (p <0.05)。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Salmonella is an important pathogen in terms of zoonoses, poultry has been thought to be one of the major medium for human salmonellosis. Broiler chickens are one of the most commonly consumed chicken breed in Taiwan, therefore monitor it’s rearing and feeding conditions are very important. In order to alleviate the risk at commercial broiler chicken farms, a questionnaire based retrospective case-control study was conducted to identify risk factors with Salmonella contamination during the broiler rearing period. Forty-one broiler farms in northern Taiwan were studied from April 2008 to May 2009, included 14 open-sided and 27 wet pad cooling system housing type of chicken farms. All of the flock size was larger than 10,000 and only one house was studied in each farm. Through preliminary study, methods for the investigation of the broiler farms risk factor were established. Samples were taken at three consecutive time-points, visceral organs of chickens and feeds were also collected for further analysis. The results showed a flock positive rate of 56.1 % and the housing type of farms did not have a significant effect on Salmonella contamination (p >0.05). Through data analysis, odds ratios of ten risk factors indicated that thry may associate with the decrease in poultry farm contaminations although not statistically significant. These risk factors includes: (1) pad cooling system house which are single layered instead of multiple; (2) the entrance of the farm is locked; (3) none-tap drinking water for animals are pre-treated; (4) dog/cat feces are regularly cleaned in the farm; (5) workers outfits are changed and cleaned on a daily basis; (6) the farm is separated from the outside by a wall; (7) a single indoor room available for changing clothes and cleaning hands before entering the chicken house; (8) The cages used for transporting day-old chick are not reusable plastic cages; (9) a single source for day-old chick; (10) molds or coagulated litters are removed before use. Moreover, the weather factor of northern Taiwan is also worth mentioning, since contamination of Salmonella in broiler farms is significantly higher in colder seasons (p <0.05) .
Since contaminated poultry feeds may aid in the process of Salmonella spreading in poultry farms, an investigation of poultry feeds were also performed. Different sampling sites and isolation treatment methods were compared. The result shows a total Salmonella isolation rate to be 7.6 % (59/778), flock positive rate was 21.4 % (33/154). Feed samples included 16 different brands, Salmonella were isolated from five of the brands. The data analysis showed (1) isolation rate of different brands are significantly different; (2) isolation rate of feed troughts from broiler house showed a significantly higher isolation rate than from other types of poultry; (3) not taking sampling site into account, breeder chicken feeds have a higher contamination rate than other types of feeds; (4) Overall, the best culturing medium for Salmonella isolation from chicken feeds is to use RVS plus XLD. (p <0.05)。 | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-20T20:02:33Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-98-R95629036-1.pdf: 513154 bytes, checksum: 379204263f3ad76f966460d73c30c501 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2009 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 中文摘要…………………………………………………………………I
英文摘要…………………………………………………………………II 目錄………………………………………………………………………IV 表次………………………………………………………………………VI 圖次………………………………………………………………………VIII 第一章 前言 1 第二章 文獻回顧 第一節 沙門氏桿菌之研究背景 2-1.1 沙門氏桿菌症與宿主特異性……………………………………2 2-1.2 沙門氏桿菌之毒力因子與致病特性……………………………2 2-1.3 臺灣地區沙門氏桿菌之流行病學調查…………………………7 第二節 家禽污染沙門氏桿菌調查 2-2.1 沙門氏桿菌於白肉雞產業之影響與概況………………………10 2-2.2 家禽沙門氏桿菌流行型別之改變與趨勢………………………10 2-2.3 各國家禽污染沙門氏桿菌之風險因子調查概況………………12 2-2.4 其他值得注意之風險因子………………………………………17 第三節 家禽飼料污染沙門氏桿菌之調查與防治方法 2-3.1 各國的流行病學調查結果………………………………………18 2-3.2 飼料工業的防治方法……………………………………………21 2-3.2.1 飼料製程之危害管制點………………………………………21 2-3.2.2 其他應用於飼料業之防治措施………………………………21 第三章 材料與方法 第一節 北臺灣白肉雞場污染沙門氏桿菌調查 3-1.1 試驗設計…………………………………………………………24 3-1.2 調查與試驗方法…………………………………………………25 3-1.2.1 雞場設施與飼育條件之問卷調查……………………………25 3-1.2.2 採樣時間與樣本種類…………………………………………26 3-1.3 沙門氏桿菌分離與鑑定方法……………………………………27 3-1.4 統計分析方法……………………………………………………28 第二節 臺灣地區家禽場飼料污染沙門氏桿菌調查 3-2.1 試驗設計…………………………………………………………29 3-2.1.1 採樣策略………………………………………………………29 3-2.1.2 飼料檢體之採樣方法…………………………………………30 3-2.2 沙門氏桿菌之分離與鑑定………………………………………31 3-2.3 統計分析方法……………………………………………………31 第四章 結果 第一節 北臺灣地區白肉雞場污染沙門氏桿菌風險因子調查 4-1.1 前預備試驗調查結果……………………………………………32 4-1.2 北臺灣地區調查結果整合………………………………………34 4-1.3 北臺灣白肉雞場污染沙門氏桿菌之風險因子…………………36 4-1.4 沙門氏桿菌污染於雞場之分佈情形……………………………36 4-1.5 沙門氏桿菌分離株之血清型鑑定………………………………37 第二節 臺灣地區家禽飼料污染沙門氏桿菌調查 4-2.1 前預備試驗………………………………………………………38 4-2.2 調查結果整合……………………………………………………40 4-2.3 不同檢體種類與培養基分離效果之比較………………………41 4-2.4 沙門氏桿菌分離株之血清型鑑定………………………………41 第五章 討論 第一節 北臺灣地區白肉雞場污染沙門氏桿菌風險因子調查………43 第二節 臺灣地區家禽飼料污染沙門氏桿菌調查……………………47 圖表……………………………………………………………………50 參考文獻………………………………………………………………67 附錄一、家禽場之飼養管理與感染沙門氏桿菌之風險因子問卷…79 附錄二、白肉雞場污染沙門氏桿菌之風險因子分析結果…………86 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 北臺灣白肉雞場污染沙門氏桿菌之風險因子分析暨全臺家禽場飼料之沙門氏桿菌污染調查 | zh_TW |
dc.title | The identification of risk factors for Salmonella contamination in broiler farms in northern Taiwan and the survey for Salmonella contamination of poultry feeds in Taiwan | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 97-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 周崇熙(Chung-Hsi Jiujiu Chou),連ㄧ洋(Yi-Yang Lien) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 沙門氏桿菌,白肉雞,風險因子,勝算比,飼料, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Salmonella spp.,salmonellae,broiler,risk factor,odds ratio,feed,feedstuff, | en |
dc.relation.page | 90 | |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
dc.date.accepted | 2009-08-19 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 獸醫專業學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 獸醫學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 獸醫學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-98-1.pdf | 501.13 kB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。