請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/88428
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 邱祈榮 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.advisor | Chyi-Rong Chiou | en |
dc.contributor.author | 賴彥銘 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author | Yen-Ming Lai | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-08-15T16:15:34Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-11-09 | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2023-08-15 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2023 | - |
dc.date.submitted | 2023-07-29 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Blanco-Canqui, H. (2017). Biochar and Soil Physical Properties [https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2017.01.0017]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 81(4), 687-711. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2017.01.0017
Boardman, A. E., Greenberg, D. H., Vining, A. R., & Weimer, D. L. (2017). Cost-benefit analysis: concepts and practice. Cambridge University Press. Bridgwater, A. V., & Peacocke, G. V. C. (2000). Fast pyrolysis processes for biomass. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 4(1), 1-73. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-0321(99)00007-6 Bridgwater, A. V., Toft, A. J., & Brammer, J. G. (2002). A techno-economic comparison of power production by biomass fast pyrolysis with gasification and combustion. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 6(3), 181-246. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-0321(01)00010-7 Bridgwater, A. V. (2003). Renewable fuels and chemicals by thermal processing of biomass. Chemical Engineering Journal, 91(2), 87-102. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S1385-8947(02)00142-0 Cherubini, F., & Ulgiati, S. (2010). Crop Residues as Raw Materials for Biorefinery Systems–A LCA Case Study. Applied Energy, 87, 47-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.08.024 Clare, A., Shackley, S., Joseph, S., Hammond, J., Pan, G., & Bloom, A. (2015). Competing uses for China's straw: the economic and carbon abatement potential of biochar. Gcb Bioenergy, 7(6), 1272-1282. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12220 Fan, J., Kalnes, T. N., Alward, M., Klinger, J., Sadehvandi, A., & Shonnard, D. R. (2011). Life cycle assessment of electricity generation using fast pyrolysis bio-oil. Renewable Energy, 36(2), 632-641. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2010.06.045 Foundation, E. M. (2013). Towards the Circular Economy. Galinato, S. P., Yoder, J. K., & Granatstein, D. (2011). The economic value of biochar in crop production and carbon sequestration. Energy Policy, 39(10), 6344-6350. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.07.035 Huang, Y., Anderson, M., McIlveen-Wright, D., Lyons, G. A., McRoberts, W. C., Wang, Y. D., Roskilly, A. P., & Hewitt, N. J. (2015). Biochar and renewable energy generation from poultry litter waste: A technical and economic analysis based on computational simulations. Applied Energy, 160, 656-663. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.01.029 IBI. (2015). Standardized Product Definition and Product Testing Guidelines for Biochar That Is Used in Soil. IPCC. (2018). Global Warming of 1.5°C.An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty. IPCC. (2021). Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Ippolito, J. A., Cui, L., Kammann, C., Wrage-Mönnig, N., Estavillo, J. M., Fuertes-Mendizabal, T., Cayuela, M. L., Sigua, G., Novak, J., Spokas, K., & Borchard, N. (2020). Feedstock choice, pyrolysis temperature and type influence biochar characteristics: a comprehensive meta-data analysis review. Biochar, 2(4), 421-438. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42773-020-00067-x Jeffery, S., Abalos, D., Prodana, M., Bastos, A. C., Van Groenigen, J. W., Hungate, B. A., & Verheijen, F. (2017). Biochar boosts tropical but not temperate crop yields. Environmental Research Letters, 12(5), 053001. Joseph, S., Cowie, A. L., Van Zwieten, L., Bolan, N., Budai, A., Buss, W., Cayuela, M. L., Graber, E. R., Ippolito, J. A., & Kuzyakov, Y. (2021). How biochar works, and when it doesn't: A review of mechanisms controlling soil and plant responses to biochar. Gcb Bioenergy, 13(11), 1731-1764. Josh Burke, Luca Taschini, Stuart Evans, Karishma Gulrajani, & Aaron Tam. (2020). Carbon pricing options for Taiwan. London: Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and The Environment, LSE Lal, R. (2004). Carbon emission from farm operations. Environment International, 30(7), 981-990. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2004.03.005 Lu, H. R., & El Hanandeh, A. (2017). Assessment of bioenergy production from mid-rotation thinning of hardwood plantation: life cycle assessment and cost analysis. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 19(8), 2021-2040. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-017-1386-1 Lu, H. R., & El Hanandeh, A. (2019). Life cycle perspective of bio-oil and biochar production from hardwood biomass; what is the optimum mix and what to do with it? Journal of Cleaner Production, 212, 173-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.025 Manzone, M. (2015). Energy consumption and CO 2 analysis of different types of chippers used in wood biomass plantations. Applied Energy, 156, 686-692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.07.049 Mehmood, I., Qiao, L., Chen, H., Tang, Q., Woolf, D., & Fan, M. (2020). Biochar addition leads to more soil organic carbon sequestration under a maize-rice cropping system than continuous flooded rice. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2020.106965 Mohammadi, A., Khoshnevisan, B., Venkatesh, G., & Eskandari, S. (2020). A Critical Review on Advancement and Challenges of Biochar Application in Paddy Fields: Environmental and Life Cycle Cost Analysis. Processes, 8(10). Mohan, D., Pittman, C. U., Jr., & Steele, P. H. (2006). Pyrolysis of Wood/Biomass for Bio-oil: A Critical Review. Energy & Fuels, 20(3), 848-889. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef0502397 Oldfield, T. L., Sikirica, N., Mondini, C., López, G., Kuikman, P. J., & Holden, N. M. (2018). Biochar, compost and biochar-compost blend as options to recover nutrients and sequester carbon. Journal of Environmental Management, 218, 465-476. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.04.061 Peters, J. F., Iribarren, D., & Dufour, J. (2015). Biomass Pyrolysis for Biochar or Energy Applications? A Life Cycle Assessment. Environmental Science & Technology, 49(8), 5195-5202. https://doi.org/10.1021/es5060786 Roberts, K. G., Gloy, B. A., Joseph, S., Scott, N. R., & Lehmann, J. (2010). Life Cycle Assessment of Biochar Systems: Estimating the Energetic, Economic, and Climate Change Potential. Environmental Science & Technology, 44(2), 827-833. https://doi.org/10.1021/es902266r Singh, H., Northup, B. K., Rice, C. W., & Prasad, P. V. V. (2022). Biochar applications influence soil physical and chemical properties, microbial diversity, and crop productivity: a meta-analysis. Biochar, 4(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42773-022-00138-1 Tomczyk, A., Sokołowska, Z., & Boguta, P. (2020). Biochar physicochemical properties: pyrolysis temperature and feedstock kind effects. Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology, 19(1), 191-215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11157-020-09523-3 The international “4 per 1000” initiative, https://4p1000.org/what-is-the-4-per-1000-initiative/?lang=en, assessed by 2023/1/9 Vaccari, F. P., Baronti, S., Lugato, E., Genesio, L., Castaldi, S., Fornasier, F., & Miglietta, F. (2011). Biochar as a strategy to sequester carbon and increase yield in durum wheat. European Journal of Agronomy, 34(4), 231-238. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2011.01.006 Verheijen, F., Jeffery, S., Bastos, A., Van der Velde, M., & Diafas, I. (2010). Biochar application to soils. A critical scientific review of effects on soil properties, processes, and functions. EUR, 24099(162), 2183-2207. Weber, K., & Quicker, P. (2018). Properties of biochar. Fuel, 217, 240-261. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2017.12.054 Woolf, D., Amonette, J., Street-Perrott, F. et al. Sustainable biochar to mitigate global climate change . Nat Commun 1, 56 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms1053 中華民國國家科學及技術委員會(2022)IPCC氣候變遷第六次評估報告「衝擊、調適與脆弱度」之科學重點摘錄與臺灣氣候變遷衝擊評析更新報告。 生物炭料源供應及應用管理平台(2022)料源供應空間決策系統。檢自https://biochar.tfri.gov.tw/biocharsystem/biochargis/BiocharGIS.aspx 江玄政、黃國恭、黃雪娟 (2001),ISO 14000 系列生命週期評估技術與應用手冊, 經濟部工業局。 交通部公路總局(2018)公路總局1070709核算運價調整為7.22/噸公里。檢自:http://www.t-truck.com.tw/law-page.php?id=187。台北市:台灣省汽車貨運商業同業公會聯合會 交通部運輸研究所(2015)碳足跡排放係數。檢自:https://data.gov.tw/dataset/28176。台北市:行政院環境保護署 行政院農業委員會 (2018)利用農用生物炭減少土壤碳排放、促進碳封 存及改善環境之效益評估 行政院農業委員會(2022)農業統計資料查詢。檢自:https://agrstat.coa.gov.tw/sdweb/public/inquiry/InquireAdvance.aspx 行政院環境保護署(2019)溫室氣體排放係數管理表6.0.4版。檢自:https://ghgregistry.epa.gov.tw/epa_ghg/Downloads/FileDownloads.aspx?Type_ID=1。台北市:行政院環境保護署 行政院環境保護署(2021)事業廢棄物申報結果。檢自:https://www.epa.gov.tw/Page/8514DFCAB3529136 邱祈榮主持(2019)農林剩餘資材再利用北部產業鏈建構108年期末成果報告。台北市:行政院農業委員會林業試驗所 姚銘輝、陳守泓(2009)。氣候變遷下水稻生長及產量之衝擊評估 [The Impact Evaluation of Climate Change on the Growth and Yield of Rice]. 作物、環境與生物資訊, 6(3), 141-156. https://doi.org/10.30061/ceb.200909_6(3).0001 經濟部石化產業高值化推動辦公室(2015)油品常見指標。檢自https://www.pipo.org.tw/Life/Faq/more?id=26 經濟部能源局(2021)110年度再生能源電能躉購費率及其計算公式 經濟部能源局(2021)110年能源統計手冊。台北市:經濟部能源局 經濟部能源局(2022)110年度我國燃料燃燒二氧化碳排放統計與分析。 經濟部能源局(2022)110年度電力排放係數。檢自:https://www.moeaboe.gov.tw/ecw/populace/content/ContentDesc.aspx?menu_id=20850 經濟部能源局(2022)111年度再生能源電能躉購費率正式公告。檢自:https://www.moeaboe.gov.tw/ECW/populace/news/News.aspx?kind=1&menu_id=41&news_id=25019 經濟部能源局(2023)能源統計年報。檢自:https://www.esist.org.tw/publication/page01 雲林縣政府建設處(2012)雲林縣建築物工程造價標準表。檢自:https://economic.yunlin.gov.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=1529&s=267204 勞動部(2022)110年職類別薪資調查。檢自https://statdb.mol.gov.tw/html/svy10/1035menu.htm 臺灣期貨交易所(2022)每日外幣參考匯率。檢自:https://www.taifex.com.tw/cht/3/dailyFXRate 蔡坤憲、黃旌集、吳文哲(2012))氣候變遷對蟲媒及蟲媒傳染病的影響 [Effects of Climate Change on Vectors and Vector-borne Infectious Diseases]. 台灣醫學, 16(5), 479-488. https://doi.org/10.6320/fjm.2012.16(5).04 盧怡靜、呂穎彬 (2014) 。ISO 14040生命週期評估的下一步。永續產業發展,頁29-35。 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/88428 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 台灣於2021年宣布2050淨零排放目標,並且在淨零轉型路徑中強調負碳技術是補足淨零排放的一環。同時,我國也積極發展再生能源,落實能源轉型願景。在減碳與增能之架構下,農業廢棄物是解決問題的潛在方法。果樹農業剩餘資材由於缺乏妥善處理方式,經常被露天焚燒,造成空氣汙染。然而,將修剪之廢棄枝條以循環經濟之概念用於熱裂解可以產生生物炭、生質油和生質氣,用於創造碳匯並產生生質能。
過往之生物炭碳匯研究缺乏一致認可之生物炭碳匯計算方法。此外,亦未有研究評估系統之成本與產出,藉此了解循環經濟模式的具體可行性。因此,本研究期望透過評估雲林柑橘枝條熱裂解之碳匯潛力與整體之經濟價值,了解果樹農業剩餘資材對於台灣淨零轉型與能源轉型之助益。雲林縣每年產出約7,000公噸之乾燥柑橘枝條,經快速熱裂解後可產生1,400公噸之生物炭、4,200公噸生質油、1,400公噸生質氣。生物炭每年可以減少2,344公噸二氧化碳當量排放,但是快速熱裂解之過程與運輸距離的變動對整體之碳匯有較大影響。在經濟價值方面,以15年為營運週期,雲林柑橘枝條快速熱裂解系統之淨現值為1.02億元,內部報酬率為1.28%,還本期約需要9年。在這之中,熱裂解設備成本和再生能源躉購費率對於系統之經濟價值影響較大。最後,系統至少每年需要處理5,453公噸之乾燥柑橘枝條才能達到損益平衡,而雲林縣之柑橘枝條產量足夠供應系統運作。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Taiwan announced its net-zero emissions target for 2050 in 2021, and stated that negative carbon technologies are essential to achieve net-zero emissions. At the same time, Taiwan is developing renewable energy for energy transition. Within the framework of carbon reduction and increased renewable energy, agricultural residue resource presents a potential solution. Utilizing pruned waste branches through fast pyrolysis can produce biochar, bio-oil, and bio-gas, which contribute to carbon sequestration and generating bioenergy.
Previous research on biochar carbon sequestration lacks a universally recognized calculation method. Additionally, there has been no study assessing the costs and outputs of the system to understand the feasibility of the circular economy model. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the carbon removal potential and economic value of pyrolysis of citrus branches in Yunlin County. Yunlin County produces approximately 7,000 metric tons of dried citrus branches annually, which, through fast pyrolysis, can generate 1,400 metric tons of biochar, 4,200 metric tons of bio-oil, and 1,400 metric tons of bio-gas. The biochar can reduce CO2 equivalent emissions by 2,344 metric tons annually, but it is sensitive to the variability in the pyrolysis process and transportation distance. In terms of economic value, with a 15-year operational period, the net present value of the Yunlin citrus branch fast pyrolysis system is 102 million NT dollars, with an internal rate of return of 1.28%, and a payback period of approximately 9 years. The costs of the pyrolysis equipment and the rate of purchasing renewable energy have a greater impact on the economic value of the system. Finally, the system needs to process at least 5,453 metric tons of dried citrus branches annually to achieve break-even, and the citrus branch production in Yunlin County is sufficient to supply the system. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2023-08-15T16:15:34Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2023-08-15T16:15:34Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 誌謝 i
摘要 ii Abstract iii 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究動機 1 第二節 研究目的 4 第三節 研究流程 4 第二章 文獻回顧 6 第一節 生物炭 6 1.1 生物炭之原料 6 1.2 生物炭之製備 8 1.3 生物炭之效用 9 1.4 生物炭之應用 10 第二節 生物炭製造技術 12 2.1 氣化技術 13 2.2 熱裂解技術 14 第三節 生命週期評估 16 3.1 生命週期評估簡介 16 3.2 生命週期評估方法 17 3.3 生命週期評估於生物炭領域之應用 18 第三章 研究方法 22 第一節 生物炭之原料 23 第二節 生物炭製備方法 24 第三節 生物炭碳匯評估方法 25 3.1 本研究計算之邊界 25 3.2 計算方法 26 第四節 經濟價值 29 4.1 成本效益分析指標 30 4.2 生命週期經濟價值 32 4.3 計算方法 33 第五節 決策分析 35 5.1 敏感度分析 (Sensitive analysis) 36 5.2 損益平衡分析 (Break-even Analysis) 36 第四章 結果與討論 37 第一節 生物炭碳匯評估結果 37 第二節 經濟價值評估結果 40 第三節 敏感度分析 49 3.1 碳匯敏感度分析 49 3.2 成本敏感度分析 51 3.3 效益敏感度分析 55 第四節 損益平衡分析 58 第五章 結論與建議 60 第一節 結論 60 第二節 研究限制 62 第三節 建議 63 參考資料 64 | - |
dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
dc.title | 柑橘果樹剩餘資材之碳匯潛力與經濟價值評估 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Assessment of The Carbon Removal Potential and Economic Value of Residue Branches of Citrus Fruit Tree | en |
dc.type | Thesis | - |
dc.date.schoolyear | 111-2 | - |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 林俊成;謝宜桓 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | JUN-CHENG LIN;YI-HUAN XIE | en |
dc.subject.keyword | 剩餘資材,生物炭,碳匯,熱裂解, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Residue Materials,Biochar,Carbon Sequestration,Fast Pyrolysis, | en |
dc.relation.page | 68 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202302188 | - |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(限校園內公開) | - |
dc.date.accepted | 2023-08-01 | - |
dc.contributor.author-college | 理學院 | - |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 氣候變遷與永續發展國際學位學程 | - |
顯示於系所單位: | 氣候變遷與永續發展國際學位學程(含碩士班、博士班) |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-111-2.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.6 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。