請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/88264
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 黃克先 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.advisor | Ke-hsien Huang | en |
dc.contributor.author | 蔡恩亞 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author | En-Ya Tsai | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-08-09T16:16:30Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-11-09 | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2023-08-09 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2023 | - |
dc.date.submitted | 2023-07-13 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | 一、中文書目
丁仁傑 1999 《社會脈絡中的助人行為:台灣佛教慈濟功德會個案研究》,台北:聯經。 王榮昌 2013 〈台灣基督教大型教會形成因素初探〉。神學與教會,38(2),324-341。 朱三才 2017 《2017台灣基督教會教勢報告》,查詢日期:2022.12.27。https://trends.ccea.org.tw/article/2017%E5%B9%B4%E5%8F%B0%E7%81%A3%E5%9F%BA%E7%9D%A3%E6%95%99%E6%9C%83%E6%95%99%E5%8B%A2%E5%A0%B1%E5%91%8A.pdf 自由時報 2022 《台灣寺廟年年增、教堂漸凋零》,查詢日期:2022.10.14。https://ec.ltn.com.tw/article/breakingnews/3927332 林瑋嬪、黃克先編 2022 《氛圍的感染:感官經驗與宗教的邊界》。台北:台大出版中心。 姜貞吟 2021 《做男人:宗族裡的男子氣概與性別象徵》。人文及社會科學集刊,33(4),737-785。 麥啟理 2019 《2019年台灣各區基督教教勢報告》,查詢日期:2022.10.14 https://trends.ccea.org.tw/article/2019年台灣各區基督教教勢報告%20.pdf 傅仰止、林本鉉、蔡明璋、廖培珊、謝淑慧 主編 2019 《台灣社會變遷基本調查報告 第七期第四次調查計畫執行報告》 陳永平 2020 《基督教現代化對於台灣青年的影響—以藝之星教會為例》。東吳大學社會系碩士論文。 陳胤安 2011 〈宗教經驗的形塑及其意識型態:以臺灣五旬節/靈恩運動為例〉,台灣人類學刊;12卷1期,p.55-86。 郭宇欣 2021 〈神聖的背叛:基督教會性暴力事件處理之建制民族誌研究〉。世新大學性別研究所碩士論文。 基督教今日報 2013 《台灣教會12大增長現象與七大挑戰契機》,查詢日期:2022.12.27。https://cdn-news.org/News.aspx?EntityID=News&PK=0000000000652e596e86eb2e24f2b84a995682fe77f055a2 基督教論壇報 2022 《2022台灣教會普查報告:聚會人數下滑32.6% 堂會數逆勢增長305間 家教會、微教會興起 夏昊霝牧師:信徒不回來教會就走出去》,查詢日期:2022.12.27。https://ct.org.tw/html/news/3-3.php?cat=10&article=1392657 許琅光 2001 《祖蔭下:中國鄉村的親屬・人格與社會流動》,徐隆德、王芃(譯)。台北:南天。 許貴芬 2020 《探討基督教會增長策略:以花蓮博愛浸信會幸福小組為例》。東華大學族群關係與文化學系碩士論文。 黃克先 2013 〈初探宗教無給勞務:以一美國華人移民教會為例〉。《臺灣宗教研究》12卷第2期,頁61-82。 黃克先 2018 〈全球化東方開打的「文化戰爭」:台灣保守基督教如何現身公領域反對同志婚姻合法化〉,收錄於陳美華、王秀雲、黃于玲主編,《慾望性公民》。台北:巨流。頁229-250。 黃克先 2021a 〈台灣基督教會發展與社會變遷:兼談教會分類〉。頁65-88,收入伊慶春、蘇國賢編,《改變中的基督信仰:台灣基督教會與基督徒的社會分析》。台北市:台大出版中心。 黃克先 2022 〈團體與社會共舞:台灣基督宗教與社會變遷〉出自齊偉先編《入世、修持與跨界:當代台灣宗教的社會學解讀》。台北:台大出版中心。頁159-181。 國度復興報 2015 《信望盟首場造勢 宣告政治新起點》,查詢日期:2023.5.28。http://www.krtnews.com.tw/church/item/17702-信望盟首場造勢-宣告新政治起點 喬瑟芬 2018 《動員力驚人的台灣反同教會,與中美的千絲萬縷關係》,查詢日期:2021.6.8。https://theinitium.com/article/20181130-opinion-taiwan-referendum-marriage-equality-us-china-factor/ 張曉偉 2021 《新媒體小組教會傳道效果之研究,以新生命小組為例》,國立清華大學社會所碩士論文。 劉盈孜 2016 In the Name of True Love: Home-State Family Values in 2010s Taiwan. 國立中央大學英美研究所碩士論文。 蔡瑞芬 2016 《舊瓶裝新酒─台南聖教會傳教發展之研究(1928-2005)》。台南大學台灣文化研究所碩士論文。 潘秋郎 2017 〈曠野反思:攻佔各大山頭?〉,曠野雜誌,211期。http://www.cap.org.tw/W/w-211-2.html 趙星光 2003 <全球化與世俗化過程中新興宗教的傳佈>,《宗教論述專輯》,頁1-37,台北:行政院內政部出版。 黎凡瑄 2009 〈宗教團體的公民性與公共參與-以台北靈糧堂為例〉,國立臺灣大學社會系碩士論文。 魏格納。何國強譯 1991 《教會增長策略》。台北:學園傳道會。 蘇國賢 2021 〈職份、呼召或專業?台灣基督教傳道人的專業化〉收錄於伊慶春、蘇國賢主編《改變中的基督信仰與社會:臺灣基督教會與基督徒的社會學分析》頁68-102。 台北:臺大出版中心。 蘇國賢、伊慶春 2021 《改變中的基督信仰與社會:臺灣基督教會與基督徒的社會學分析》。 台北:臺大出版中心。 二、英文書目 Butler, Anthea. White Evangelical Racism: The Politics of Morality in America. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press, 2021. muse.jhu.edu/book/82226. Barnes, Sandra L. Live Long and Prosper: How Black Megachurches Address HIV/AIDS and Poverty in the Age of Prosperity Theology. Fordham University Press, 2012. Fordham Scholarship Online, 2013. doi: 10.5422/fordham/9780823249565.001.0001. Belzen, J. A. (1999). Religion as embodiment: Cultural-psychological concepts and methods in the study of conversion among "Bevindelijken". Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 38(2), 236–253. https://doi.org/10.2307/1387792 Bourdieu, P. (1998). La domination masculine. Paris: Seuil. Chan, K. (2017). "City Harvest Church of Singapore: An Ecclesial Paradigm for Pentecostalism in the Postmodern World". In Global Chinese Pentecostal and Charismatic Christianity. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill. doi: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004342811_016 Ting-Fang Chin (2021) The vulnerable self: narratives of heterosexual marriage in Taiwan, Journal of Gender Studies, 30:5, 525-535, DOI: 10.1080/09589236.2021.1929095 Chao, Hsing-Kuang. 2006. “Conversion to conservative Protestantism among urban immigrants in Taiwan” Sociology of Religion: a Quarterly Review 67(2):193-204. (SSCI) (NSC90-2412-H-029-004) Chong, Kelly H. Deliverance and Submission: Evangelical Women and the Negotiation of Patriarchy in South Korea. Harvard Univ. Asia Center, 2008. Chong, Terence. “Megachurches in Singapore: The Faith of an Emergent Middle Class.” Pacific Affairs 88, no. 2 (2015): 215–35. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43591111 Chong, T. (Ed.). (2018). Pentecostal Megachurches in Southeast Asia: Negotiating Class, Consumption and the Nation. ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute. Chong, T. and Daniel Goh. “Beyond Mall Christianity: Megachurches Navigating Southeast Asian Urbanisms”, Pacific Affairs, 2022, 95 (1): 5-26 Coleman, Simon. “Borderlands Ethics, ethnography, and “repugnant” Christianity.” Journal of Ethnography Theory 5, no.2 (2015): 275-300. https://doi.org/10.14318/hau5.2.016 Coleman, Simon, and Saliha Chattoo. “Megachurches and Popular Culture: On Enclaving and Encroaching.” In Handbook of Megachurches, edited by Stephen Hunt, 84–102. Brill, 2020. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1163/j.ctv2gjwndw.9. Collins, Randall. Interaction Ritual Chains. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400851744 von der Ruhr, M., & Daniels, J. P. (2012). Subsidizing Religious Participation Through Groups: A Model of the “Megachurch” Strategy for Growth. Review of Religious Research, 53(4), 471–491. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41940753 Du Mez K. K. (2020). Jesus and john wayne : how white evangelicals corrupted a faith and fractured a nation (First). Liveright Publishing Corporation a division of W.W. Norton & Company. Durkheim, Émile, 1858-1917. The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. New York: Free Press, 1995. Ellingson, Stephen. (2008). The Rise of the Megachurches and Changes in Religious Culture: Review Article. Sociology Compass. 3. 16 - 30. 10.1111/j.1751-9020.2008.00182.x. Elisha, Omri. Moral Ambition: Mobilization and Social Outreach in Evangelical Megachurches. University of California Press, 2011. California Scholarship Online, 2012. doi: 10.1525/california/9780520267503.001.0001. Ferrer, J. (2008). What does it mean to live a fully embodied spiritual life? International Journal of Transpersonal Studies, 27(1), 1–11.. International Journal of Transpersonal Studies, 27 (1). https://doi.org/10.24972/ijts.2008.27.1.1 Foucault, M. (1982). The Subject and Power. Critical Inquiry, 8(4), 777–795. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1343197 Foucault, M. (1991). Governmentality. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault Effects: Studies in Governmentality (pp. 87-104). London: Harvester Wheatsheaf. Foucult, Michel (2007). Security, territory, population: lectures at the Collège de France, 1977-78. New York: République Francaise. Huang, K. (2017). "Chapter 6 Taming the Spirit by Appropriating Indigenous Culture: An Ethnographic Study of the True Jesus Church as Confucian-Style Pentecostalism". In Global Chinese Pentecostal and Charismatic Christianity. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill. doi: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004342811_008 KAO, Ying-Chao. (2018). Organizing Transnational Moral Conservatism: How U.S. Christian and Taiwanese "Pro-Family" Movements Converge, Diverge, and Collide. Ph.D. Dissertation, Rutgers University. Kim, U., Triandis, H. C., Kâğitçibaşi, Ç., Choi, S.-C., & Yoon, G. (Eds.). (1994). Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method, and applications. Sage Publications, Inc. Sung-Gun Kim. "Cultural Globalization and the “Subjective Turn”:The Spiritual Revolution in Korean Christianity" Korea Observer 37, no.1 (2006) : 217-236. Kimberly Karnes, Wayne McIntosh, Irwin L. Morris, and Shanna Pearson-Merkowitz. “Mighty Fortresses: Explaining the Spatial Distribution of American Megachurches.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 46, no. 2 (2007): 261–68. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4621973. 2010 Kim, Sharon, A Faith of Our Own: Second Generation Spirituality in Korean American Churches. New Jersey: Rutgers University Press. Lee, Cheng-Pang & Suh, Myungsahm. (2017). State Building and Religion: Explaining the Diverged Path of Religious Change in Taiwan and South Korea, 1950–1980. American Journal of Sociology. 123. 465-509. 10.1086/692728. Pei-Ru Liao (2020) ‘Only filial piety can produce heirs, not homosexuals!’: an exploration of the glocalised rhetoric of the pro-family movement in Taiwan, Culture and Religion, 21:2, 139-156, DOI: 10.1080/14755610.2021.1906726 Lindenbaum, John (2012) The pastoral role of Contemporary Christian Music: the spiritualization of everyday life in a suburban evangelical megachurch, Social & Cultural Geography, 13:1, 69-88, DOI: 10.1080/14649365.2011.635802 Lindsay, D. Michael. Faith in the Halls of Power: How Evangelicals Joined the American Elite (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008). Robles-Anderson, Erica; The Crystal Cathedral: Architecture for Mediated Congregation. Public Culture1 September 2012; 24 (3 68): 577–599. doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/08992363-1630672 Rocha, Cristina. (2021). Global Religious Infrastructures: The Australian Megachurch Hillsong in Brazil. Social Compass. 68. 003776862110010. 10.1177/00377686211001029. Sanders, George. “Religious Non-Places: Corporate Megachurches and Their Contributions to Consumer Capitalism.” Critical Sociology 42, no. 1 (January 2016): 71–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920514531605. Serpa, Sandro & Ferreira, Carlos. (2019). The Concept of Bureaucracy by Max Weber. International Journal of Social Science Studies. 7. 12. 10.11114/ijsss.v7i2.3979. Shilling, C., & Mellor, P. A. (2011). Retheorising Emile Durkheim on Society and Religion: Embodiment, Intoxication and Collective Life. The Sociological Review, 59(1), 17–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2010.01990.x Snow, D. and Benford, R. (1992) Master Frames and Cycles of Protest. In: Morris, A. and Mueller, C.M., Eds., Frontiers in Social Movement Theory, Yale University Press, New Haven. Thumma, Scott L. 1996 "The Kingdom, the Power, and the Glory: The Megachurch in Modern American Society." Emory University. (PhD dissertation) Ann Arbor, Michigan: Proquest. Tucker-Worgs, Tamelyn. 2011. The Black megachurch: theology, gender, and the politics of public engagement. Wade, M. (2016). Seeker-friendly: The Hillsong megachurch as an enchanting total institution. Journal of Sociology, 52(4), 661–676. https://doi.org/10.1177/1440783315575171 Walton, Jonathan L. “For Where Two or Three (Thousand) Are Gathered in My Name! A Cultural History and Ethical Analysis of African American Megachurches.” Journal of African American Studies 15, no. 2 (2012): 133–54. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43525417. Weller, Robert. (2015). GLOBAL RELIGIOUS CHANGES AND CIVIL LIFE IN TWO CHINESE SOCIETIES: A COMPARISON OF JIANGSU AND TAIWAN. The Review of Faith & International Affairs. 13. 13-24. 10.1080/15570274.2015.1039305. Wellman, J.K., Jr., Corcoran, K.E. and Stockly-Meyerdirk, K. (2014), “God Is Like a Drug…”: Explaining Interaction Ritual Chains in American Megachurches. Sociol Forum, 29: 650-672. https://doi.org/10.1111/socf.12108 Wellman, James, Katie Corcoran, and Kate Stockly. High on God: How Megachurches Won the Heart of America. New York: Oxford University Press, 2020. Oxford Scholarship Online, 2019. doi: 10.1093/oso/9780199827718.001.0001. Wilford, Justin. Sacred Subdivisions: The Postsuburban Transformation of American Evangelicalism. NYU Press, 2012. NYU Press Scholarship Online, 2016. doi: 10.18574/nyu/9780814725351.001.0001. Yang, C. K. (1961). Religion in Chinese society: a study of contemporary social functions of religion and some of their historical factors. (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press). | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/88264 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 本研究揭露當代台灣積極參與社會的巨型教會如何藉由小組、組織運作、集體文化與動員論述,克服巨型組織內部的互動張力,以凝聚並動員信徒成為進入社會的轉化力量。本文以「傳恩堂」,一間發展近五十年的巨型教會,試圖回應研究問題:「作為具有明確擴張傾向且高度重視社會參與的台灣巨型教會,傳恩堂如何可能做為宗教少數,但仍形塑並凝聚會眾的投入與認同,並進一步將宗教力量轉化為進入世俗中的力量?」研究者延續既有研究中以組織為綱的討論軸線,以近九個月的田野工作,以微觀互動視角回應此問題。本文首先從微觀小組互動切入,指出在小組員間建立的彼此承擔連帶感,以及小組間流淌的權力規訓共存下,信徒協商於兩者間,也被程度不一地牽繫於傳恩堂的微型群體中。其二,即使傳恩堂以不完全理性科層的組織運作著,全職同工們面對勞動過程中諸多張力時,仍因著「領袖文化」而選擇服膺異象領袖與組織,使得組織仍然得以持續運轉無息,推動更多凝聚信徒的行動。進而,面對或高度凝聚、或離散的信徒。傳恩堂藉由營造具有高度集體性且與在地文化連結的家庭集體想像,牽繫異質的眾人於傳恩堂,並帶來為家付出、使家代代傳承的凝聚與動員力量。最後,傳恩堂 在高度身體性的靈性敬拜之外,賦予信徒行動意義。他們相信,成為具有卓越影響力的信徒,將可以為自己與集體帶來在現世且實際的改變。此論述回應諸多都市新興中產階級深刻的需要,使傳恩堂成為一處為苦難的集體經驗,帶來解方與解放的集體避難所。以此,本研究指出宗教經濟學之外,道德社群取徑在傳恩堂中的重要性。同時,本文也指出台灣巨型教會做為宗教少數,融入在地文化的嘗試。最後,傳恩堂所吸引與容納著的都市新興中產階級,標示這類傳遞集體動員力量的巨型教會,正改動著台灣基督徒人口特徵圖像,並為當代社會保守力量動員提供一處不容忽略的動力之源。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | The present study unveils how a contemporary megachurch in Taiwan, which passionately participate in social issues, effectively manages internal conflicts, fosters congregational commitment, and mobilizes its members through a systematic approach that encompasses both individual perspectives and collective narratives. This research aims to address the following inquiry: "How does the P.R. Church generate commitment among its congregants and further mobilize them within social spheres?" The researcher conducted an extensive nine-month field study within a megachurch referred to as "the P.R. church." To begin with, this paper proposes that members of cell groups within the P.R. Church navigate between community support and disciplinary authority, forging distinct connections with the core small groups. Additionally, full-time fellows within the church assimilate the "leader culture" to comprehend and make sense of the irrationalities and conflicts that arise within the organization. Furthermore, the P.R. Church cultivates a Chinese family environment that regulates interactional norms and delineates the responsibilities associated with active participation in the congregation. This approach effectively bridges the gap between heterogeneous communities within the congregation. Lastly, the church constructs a narrative centered around material and collective transformation, offering the emerging urban middle class within the church a means to seek deliverance. Thus, in addition to the individualistic market approach, this study highlights the Durkheimian communal aspect within a religious organization. Moreover, the study emphasizes that megachurches, such as the P.R. Church, are reshaping the landscape of Christian populations in Taiwan while also serving as conduits for the introduction of right-wing ideologies. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2023-08-09T16:16:30Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2023-08-09T16:16:30Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 致謝……………………………………………………………………………………ii
摘要……………………………………………………………………………...iv Abstract……………………………………………………………………………....v 目錄…………………………………………………………………………………...vi 圖表目錄……………………………………………………………………………viii 第一章、建立傳恩:巨型教會在台灣…………………………………………………1 一、前言:起心動念與研究問題………………………………………………2 二、文獻回顧……………………………………………………………………..4 (一)巨型教會(Megachurch)的發展與特徵………………………….5 (二)巨型教會的擴張機制………………………………………………7 三、研究方法………………………………………………….. ………………12 (一)田野參與觀察法……………………….. …………………….……12 (二)田野地:巨型教會傳恩堂…………………………………………15 (三)傳恩堂之於當代台灣巨型教會……………………………………18 四、章節論證安排……………………….. …………………………………….19 第二章、「合一」小組:彼此承擔與權力修剪共造的微型歸屬……………………23 一、小組:巨型組織中的微型網絡……………………….. …………………25 二、塑造「合一」:凝聚小組集體性…………………………………………27 (一)小組常規集體活動……………………….. ……………………….27 (二)小組私揪聚集……………………….. …………………………….29 三、合一中的「修剪」:隱微權力下的協商身體……………………………31 (一)規訓景象……………………….. ………………………………….32 (二)信徒與權力間的反抗及協商空間…………………………………35 (三)何以順服:凝聚與規訓間的協商…………………………………39 四、小結:內聚合一與劃界修剪的微型集體…………………………………41 第三章、爲著「呼召」:傳恩堂組織運作與領袖文化……………………………43 一、傳恩堂組織運作:……………………….. ………………………………45 (一)傳恩堂組織架構……………………….. ………………………….45 (二)卡里斯馬異象領袖……………………….. ……………………….47 (三)組織骨幹:靈性牧養與理性行政並存的全職同工………………50 二、巨型組織背後:組織運作內部張力………………………………………53 (一)不完全科層:組織內的奔波與無所適從………………………..54 (二)牧羊人的肝與理性計算的拉扯…………………………………..55 (三)牧養之下:衝突與傷痕…………………………………………..58 三、因為呼召:領袖文化下的甘願……………………….. …………………61 (一)屬靈遮蓋:領袖—門徒關係………………………………………61 (二)走入命定:呼召為首、末後指望…………………………………65 (三)領袖文化:合理化與消弭衝突的文化邏輯………………………..68 四、小結……………………….. ……………………….. ……………………..71 第四章、成為「一家人」:家庭作為集體想像與互動秩序…………………………..73 一、翻轉華人世界:傳恩堂的「華人」集體想像……………………………75 (一)華人作為集體身分想像……………………….. …………………75 (二)展現集體主義……………………….. …………………………….77 二、是神的家,也是華人的家……………………….. ………………………..79 (一)異象領袖作為大家長……………………….. ……………………79 (二)長幼有序作為互動秩序……………………………………………80 (三)邁向代代傳承、讓家偉大…………………………………………83 三、建立家庭、建立異性戀常規下的性別秩序……………………………..86 (一)婚姻家庭作為預設的生命選擇…………………………………..86 (二)異性戀常規(Heteronormativity)下的性別秩序…………………87 (三)性別秩序的鬆動可能………………………………………………90 四、小結……………………….. ……………………….. ……………………91 第五章、成就「傳恩」:信徒動員景象與動員論述………………………………93 一、信徒動員圖像:活出信心宣告……………………………………………93 (一)飛鷹生命:每週實踐的集體敬拜讚美……………………………93 (二)陽光使徒:寒冬中的熱血傳福音…………………………………95 (三)行善宣教的教會:送改變到肯亞…………………………………97 二、動員論述邏輯:我們是卓越的人……………………….. ………………98 (一)傳恩堂使徒:卓越與影響力……………………………………..100 (二)動員之源:為人們帶來改變與解救……………………………..104 (三)動員之果:將來必然的祝福恩……………………………………107 三、討論:苦痛中的避難所……………………….. …………………………111 四、小結……………………….. ……………………….. ……………………114 第六章、結論:製造合一,製造傳恩……………………….. ……………………117 一、結論……………………….. ……………………….. ……………………117 二、研究限制……………………….. ………………………………………..121 三、研究貢獻……………………….. ………………………………………..122 參考文獻……………………….. ……………………….. ………………………..124 附錄……………………….. ………….. …………………………………………..132 一、訪綱………………………………………………………………………132 二、跋…………………………………………………………………………133 | - |
dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
dc.title | 製造合一: 臺灣巨型教會的組織凝聚與動員機制 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Manufacturing Unity: The Commitment-generating and Mobilization Mechanisms of a Megachurch in Taiwan | en |
dc.type | Thesis | - |
dc.date.schoolyear | 111-2 | - |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 蘇國賢;古明君 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | KUO-HSIEN SU;Ming-chun Ku | en |
dc.subject.keyword | 台灣巨型教會,細胞小組,領袖文化,華人家庭,道德社群,都市新興中產階級, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Megachurch in Taiwan,Cell Group,Leader Culture,Chinese Family,Moral Community,Emerging Urban Middle Class, | en |
dc.relation.page | 133 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202301457 | - |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(限校園內公開) | - |
dc.date.accepted | 2023-07-14 | - |
dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | - |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 社會學系 | - |
dc.date.embargo-lift | 2025-01-10 | - |
顯示於系所單位: | 社會學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-111-2.pdf 授權僅限NTU校內IP使用(校園外請利用VPN校外連線服務) | 3.67 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。