Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 管理學院
  3. 商學研究所
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/88256
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor簡怡雯zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorYi-Wen Chienen
dc.contributor.author張芮誼zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorJui-Yi Changen
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-09T16:14:23Z-
dc.date.available2023-11-09-
dc.date.copyright2023-08-09-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.date.submitted2023-07-17-
dc.identifier.citationAllyn, J., & Festinger, L. (1961). The effectiveness of unanticipated persuasive communication, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 62, 35–40.
Anderson, Rolphe E. (1973), “Consumer Dissatisfaction: The Effect of Disconfirmed Expectancy on Perceived Product Performance,” Journal of Marketing Research, 10 (February), 38-44.
Bahtar, A. Z., & Muda, M. (2016). The impact of User–Generated Content (UGC) on product reviews towards online purchasing–A conceptual framework. Procedia Economics and Finance, 37, 337-342.
Balaji, M. S., Khong, K. W., & Chong, A. Y. L. (2016). Determinants of negative word-of-mouth communication using social networking sites. Information & Management, 53(4), 528-540.
Belch, George E. (1981), “An Examination of Comparative and Noncomparative Television Commercials: The Effects of Claim Variation and Repetition on Cognitive Response and Message Acceptance,” Journal of Marketing Research, 18 (August), 333-49.
Bennett, M., Pecotich, A., & Putrevu, S. (1999). The influence of warnings on product placements. In B. Dubois, T. M. Lowrey, L. J. Shrum, & M. Vanhuele (Eds.), European advances in consumer research (4th ed., pp. 193–200). Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.
Bhatnagar, N., Aksoy, L., & Malkoc, S. A. (2004). Embedding brands within media content: The impact of message, media, and consumer characteristics on placement efficacy. In L. J. Shrum (Ed.), The psychology of media entertainment. Blurring the lines between entertainment and persuasion (pp. 99–116). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Elrbaum.
Bither, Stewart W., Ira Dolich, and Elaine Nell (1971), “The Application of Attitude Immunization Techniques in Marketing,” Journal of Marketing Research, 8 (February), 56- 61.
Blackshaw, P. (2011). User-generated content in context. Journal of Advertising Research, 51(1), 108-111.
Boerman, S. C., van Reijmersdal, E. A., & Neijens, P. C. (2012). Sponsorship disclosure: Effects of duration on persuasion knowledge and brand responses. Journal of Communication, 62, 1047–1064.
Buijzen, M., van Reijmersdal, E. A., & Owen, L. H. (2010). Introducing the PCMC model: An investigative framework for young people’s processing of commercialized media content. Communication Theory, 20, 427–451.
Campbell, M., & Kirmani, A. (2000). Consumers’ use of persuasion knowledge: The effects of accessibility and cognitive capacity on perceptions of an influence agent. Journal of Consumer Research, 27, 69–83.
Chen, H. C., Reardon, R., Rea, C., & Moore, D. J. (1992). Forewarning of content and involvement: Consequences for persuasion and resistance to persuasion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 28, 523–541.
Christodoulides, G., Jevons, C., & Bonhomme, J. (2012). Memo to marketers: Quantitative evidence for change: How user-generated content really affects brands. Journal of Advertising Research, 52(1), 53-64.
Etgar, Michael and Stephen A. Goodwin (1982), “One-Sided Versus Two-Sided Message Appeals for New Brand Intro- ductions,” Journal of Consumer Research, 8 (March), 460-4.
Fazio, Russell H. and Mark P. Zanna (1978), “On the Predictive Validity of Attitudes: The Roles of Direct Experience and Confidence,” Journal of Personality, 46 (June), 228-43.
Fazio, Russell H. and Mark P. Zanna (1981), “Direct Experience and Attitude- Behavior Consistency,” in Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 13, L. Berkowitz, ed. New York: Aca- demic Press, Inc., 161-202.
Fazio, Russell H., Mark P. Zanna, and Joel Cooper (1978), “Direct Experience and Attitude-Behavior Consistency: An Information Processing Analysis,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 4 (Winter), 48-51.
Federal Communications Commission. (2008). Notice of inquiry and notice of proposed rulemaking in the matter of sponsorship identification rules and embedded advertising. Federal Register, 73, 43194–43200.
Friestad, M., & Wright, P. (1994). The persuasion knowledge model: How people cope with persuasion attempts. Journal of Consumer Research, 21, 1–31.
Golden, Linda L. and Mark I. Alpert (1978), “The Relative Effectiveness of One-Sided and Two-Sided Communication for Mass Transit Advertising,” in Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 5, H. Keith Hunt, ed. Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research, 12-18.
Hass, R. Glen and Darwyn E. Linder (1972), “Counterargument Availability and the Effects of Message Structure on Persuasion,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 23 (August), 219-33.
Houston, Michael J. and Michael L. Rothschild (1977), “A Paradigm for Research on Consumer Involvement,” Working Paper #11-77-46, Graduate School of Business, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Hovland, Carl I. (1954), “Effects of the Mass Media of Communication,” in Handbook of Social Psychology, G. Lindzey, ed. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
Hunt, James M., Teresa J. Domzal, and Jerome B. Kernan (1982), “Causal Attributions and Persuasion: The Case of Disconfirmed Expectancies,” in Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 9, Andrew A. Mitchell, ed. Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research, 287-92.
Hunt, Michael F. Smith, and Jerome B. Kernan (1984), “An Attribution Theory Perspective on Using Two-Sided Messages to Increase Seller Credibility,” in Personal Selling Theory and Research and Practice, Jacob J. Jacoby and C. Samuel Craig, eds. New York: New York University, 93-108.
Jacks, J. Z., & Devine, P. G. (2000). Attitude importance, forewarning of message content, and resistance to persuasion. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 22, 19–29.
Kamins Michael A. (1984), “The Impact of Involvement, Advertising Type, and Expectation Level on Product Evaluation,” unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Graduate School of Business Administration, New York University.
Kirmani, A., & Zhu, R. (2007). Vigilant against manipulation: The effect of regulatory focus on the use of persuasion knowledge. Journal of Marketing Research, 44, 688–701.
Kuhn, K. L., Hume, M., & Love, A. (2010). Examining the covert nature of product placement: Implications for public policy. Journal of Promotion Management, 16, 59–79.
Lee, S. (2008). Product placement in the United States: A revolution in need of regulation. Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, 26, 203–232.
McCarthy, J. A. (2004). Product placement: The nature of the practice and potential avenues of inquiry. In L. J. Shrum (Ed.), The psychology of entertainment media. blurring the lines between entertainment and persuasion (pp. 45–61). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
McGuire William J. (1961), “The Effectiveness of Supportive and Refutational Defenses in Immunizing and Restoring Beliefs Against Persuasion,” Sociometry, 24 (June), 184–97.
Oliver Richard L. (1977), “Effect of Expectation and Disconfirmation of Post-Exposure Product Evaluations: An Alternative Interpretation,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 62 (August), 480–6.
Olson Jerry C., and Dover Philip (1979), “Disconfirmation of Consumer Expectations Through Product Trial,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 64 (April), 179–89.
Olson Jerry C., Toy Daniel R., and Dover Philip (1978), “Mediating Effects of Cognitive Responses to Advertising on Cognitive Structure,” m Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 5, Keith Hunt H., ed. Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research, 72–8.
Olson Jerry C., Toy Daniel R., and Dover Philip (1982), “Do Cognitive Responses Mediate the Effects of Advertising Content on Cognitive Structure?”, Journal of Consumer Research, 9 (December), 245–62.
Petty Richard E., and Cacioppo John T. (1981), “Issue Involvement as a Moderator of the Effects on Attitude of Advertising Content and Context,” in Advances in Consumer Research, Monroe Kent B., ed. Arlington, VA: Association for Consumer Research, 20–4.
Quinn, J. M., & Wood, W. (2004). Forewarnings of influence appeals: Inducing resistance and acceptance. In E. S. Knowles, & J. A. Linn (Eds.), Resistance and persuasion (pp. 193–213). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Sawyer Alan G. (1973), “The Effects of Repetition of Refutational and Supportive Advertising Appeals,” Journal of Marketing Research, 10 (February), 23–33.
Settle Robert B., and Golden Linda L. (1974), “Attribution Theory and Advertiser Credibility,” Journal of Marketing Research, 11 (May), 181–5.
Smith Robert E., and Hunt Shelby D. (1978), “Attributional Processes and Effects in Promotional Situations,” Journal of Consumer Research, 5 (December), 149–58.
Smith Robert E., and Swinyard William R. (1982), “Information Response Models: An Integrated Approach,” Journal of Marketing, 46 (Winter), 81–93.
Smith Robert E., and Swinyard William R. (1983), “Attitude-Behavior Consistency: The Impact of Product Trial Versus Advertising,” Journal of Marketing Research, 20 (August), 257–67.
Smith Robert E., and Swinyard William R. (1985), “Cognitive Response to Advertising and Trial,” working paper, Graduate School of Business, Indiana University.
Sternthal Brian, Phillips Lynn W., and Dholakia Ruby (1978), “The Persuasive Effect of Source Credibility: A Situational Analysis,” Public Opinion Quarterly, 42 (Fall), 289–314.
Szybillo George, and Heslin Richard (1973), “Resistance to Persuasion: Inoculation Theory in a Marketing Context,” Journal of Marketing Research, 10 (November), 396–403.
Tannenbaum Percy H. (1967), “The Congruity Principle Revisited: Studies in the Reduction, Induction, and Generalization of Persuasion,” in Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 3, Berkowitz L., ed. New York: Academic Press, Inc., 271–320.
Thistlethwaite Donald L., and Kemenetzky Joseph (1955), “Attitude Change Through Refutation and Elaboration of Audience Counterarguments,” Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51 (July), 3–12.
Thistlethwaite Donald L., Kemenetzky Joseph, and Schmidt Hans (1956), “Factors Influencing Attitude Change Through Refutative Communication,” Speech Monographs, 23 (Winter), 14–25.
Toy Daniel R. (1982), “Monitoring Communication Effects: Cognitive Structure/Cognitive Response Approach,” Journal of Consumer Research, 9 (June), 66–76.
Wei, M., Fischer, E., & Main, K. J. (2008). An examination of the effects of activating persuasion knowledge on consumer response to brands engaging in covert marketing. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 27, 34–44.
Wenner, L. A. (2004). On the ethics of product placement in media entertainment. Journal of Promotion Management, 10, 101–132.
Wright Peter L. (1973), “The Cognitive Processes Mediating Acceptance of Advertising,” Journal of Marketing Research, 10 (February), 53–62.
Wright Peter L. (1974), “Analyzing Media Effects on Advertising Responses,” Public Opinion Quarterly, 38 (Summer), 192–205.
Wright Peter L. (1975), “Factors Affecting Cognitive Resistance to Advertising,” Journal of Consumer Research, 2 (June), 1–9.
Zaichkowsky, J. L. (1994). The personal involvement inventory: Reduction, revision, and application to advertising. Journal of Advertising, 23(4), 59–70.
-
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/88256-
dc.description.abstract本篇論文主要研究消費者在閱讀 Instagram 文章時,不同的廣告訴求類型對貼文中產品態度之影響,以及贊助披露的有無是否會帶來效果。問卷中操弄訴求類型時,先透過前測問卷來得出三個購買產品時考量之最重要屬性以及兩個中等程度重要屬性,在單面訴求中,針對五個屬性僅傳遞正面資訊;雙面非反駁訴求中,前三項屬性以正向資訊描述、後兩項屬性傳遞負面;雙面反駁訴求有試著反駁負面訊息,調節變數則為無贊助披露與有贊助披露。可分為兩項研究,研究一為由企業所發布貼文;研究二為由用戶所發布貼文。結果顯示,受試者在處於高涉入的情況下,第一,由企業發布的貼文中,訴求類型對於產品態度沒有顯著影響。第二,由消費者發佈的貼文中,雙面反駁訴求與單面訴求條件下會比雙面非反駁訴求有更好的產品喜愛度。第三,由企業發佈的貼文中,雙面反駁訴求獲得最高的產品評價把握程度,其次為雙面非反駁訴求與單面訴求。第四,由用戶發佈的貼文中,訴求類型對於產品評價把握程度無顯著影響。第五,贊助披露作為調節變數,在單面訴求條件下,有贊助披露所獲得的產品喜愛度、購買意願與貼文可信度較無贊助披露高;而雙面訴求下,則是無贊助披露較有贊助披露高。而在無贊助披露的情況下,雙面反駁訴求擁有最高的正向評價,其次為雙面非反駁訴求與單面訴求;在有贊助披露的情況下,單面訴求獲得最高的正面分數,其次為雙面反駁訴求與雙面非反駁訴求。我們亦發現,單面訴求下有贊助披露會有最好的產品態度;雙面反駁訴求下無贊助披露有最好的購買意願;雙面非反駁訴求下無贊助披露有最好的貼文可信度,另外,雙面非反駁訴求下有贊助披露有最差的產品態度與購買意願;單面訴求下無贊助披露有最差的貼文可信度。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThis study primarily investigates the influence of one and two-sided advertising appeal types on product attitudes when reading Instagram posts, as well as the effects of sponsorship disclosure. Under the one-sided appeal condition, only positive information is conveyed for the five attributes. In the two-sided nonrefutational appeal condition, the first three attributes are described with positive information, while the last two attributes convey negative information. The two-sided refutational appeal attempts to counter the negative message. The moderating variable is the presence or absence of sponsorship disclosure. The study can be divided into two parts: Study 1, where posts are published by companies, and Study 2, where posts are published by users. The results showed that in high-involvement situations, firstly, in posts published by companies, the type of appeal did not have a significant impact on product attitudes. Secondly, in posts published by users, the two-sided refutational appeal and the one-sided appeal condition resulted in higher product liking compared to the two-sided non-refutational appeal. Thirdly, in posts published by companies, the two-sided refutational appeal had the highest level of perceived product evaluation. Fourthly, in posts published by users, the type of appeal did not have a significant impact on perceived product evaluation. Fifthly, as a moderating variable, under the one-sided appeal condition, posts with sponsorship disclosure obtained higher scores in product liking, purchase intention, and post credibility compared to posts without sponsorship disclosure. Under the two-sided appeal condition, posts without sponsorship disclosure received higher scores than posts with sponsorship disclosure.en
dc.description.provenanceSubmitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2023-08-09T16:14:23Z
No. of bitstreams: 0
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2023-08-09T16:14:23Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0en
dc.description.tableofcontents論文口試委員審定書 II
致謝 III
摘要 IV
Abstract V
目錄 VI
圖目錄 VIII
表目錄 IX
第一章 緒論 1
1.1 研究背景與動機 1
1.2 研究之重要性 3
第二章 文獻探討 4
2.1 單面訴求與雙面訴求之先前研究 4
2.1.1 接種理論 7
2.1.2 對應理論 8
2.1.3 替代理論之預測效果 9
2.1.3.1 反駁 9
2.1.3.2 支持論證 9
2.1.3.3 訊息來源可信度減損 10
2.2 用戶生成內容之先前研究 11
2.3 企業生成內容之先前研究 12
2.4 贊助披露之先前研究 13
第三章 研究架構與假說 16
3.1 研究架構 16
3.2 研究假說 17
3.3 研究工具 20
3.3.1 前測問卷 20
3.3.2 主問卷 23
3.3.2.1 問卷程序 23
3.3.2.2 情境假設 23
3.3.2.3 廣告貼文 24
3.3.2.4 問卷內容 24
3.4 研究變數 26
3.4.1 自變數操作 26
3.4.2 應變數測量 27
第四章 研究方法 28
4.1 研究流程 28
4.2 研究對象 29
第五章 研究結果 30
5.1 信度分析 30
5.2 操弄檢定 32
5.2.1 訴求類型 32
5.2.2 贊助披露 36
5.2.3 涉入程度 38
5.3 假說檢定 41
5.3.1 產品態度 41
5.3.2 購買意願 46
5.3.3 產品評價確定性 51
5.3.4 廣告內容可信度 53
第六章 結論與建議 58
6.1 研究結論 58
6.2 管理應用 61
6.3 研究限制 62
6.4 未來研究方向 64
參考文獻 66
附錄一:前測問卷 73
附錄二:主問卷 77
-
dc.language.isozh_TW-
dc.subject雙面訴求zh_TW
dc.subject企業生成內容zh_TW
dc.subject用戶生成內容zh_TW
dc.subject單面訴求zh_TW
dc.subject贊助披露zh_TW
dc.subjectOne-sideden
dc.subjectSponsorship disclosureen
dc.subjectTwo-sideden
dc.subjectFirm-generated contenten
dc.subjectUser-generated contenten
dc.title單雙面廣告訴求與贊助披露對消費者產品態度之影響 – 以 Instagram 文章為例zh_TW
dc.titleThe Effects of One and Two-Sided Advertising Appeals on Product Attitudes: The Moderating Roles of Sponsorship Disclosureen
dc.typeThesis-
dc.date.schoolyear111-2-
dc.description.degree碩士-
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee蕭中強;林嘉薇zh_TW
dc.contributor.oralexamcommitteeChung-Chiang Hsiao;Chia-Weo Linen
dc.subject.keyword企業生成內容,用戶生成內容,單面訴求,雙面訴求,贊助披露,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordUser-generated content,Firm-generated content,One-sided,Two-sided,Sponsorship disclosure,en
dc.relation.page81-
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU202301519-
dc.rights.note同意授權(限校園內公開)-
dc.date.accepted2023-07-18-
dc.contributor.author-college管理學院-
dc.contributor.author-dept商學研究所-
顯示於系所單位:商學研究所

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-111-2.pdf
授權僅限NTU校內IP使用(校園外請利用VPN校外連線服務)
4.08 MBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved