請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/88205
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 張珈健 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.advisor | Chia-Chien Chang | en |
dc.contributor.author | 黃靜雅 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author | Ching-Ya Huang | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-08-08T16:46:24Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-11-09 | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2023-08-08 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2023 | - |
dc.date.submitted | 2023-07-21 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | 壹、 中文部分
一、 期刊論文 王子昌,2003,〈東盟的地理整體與利益整體意識 ─東盟意識與東盟的發展(II)〉,《東南亞研究》,5: 4-8。 王玉主,2013,〈RCEP倡議與東盟“中心地位”〉,《國際問題研究》,5: 46-59。 吳瑟致,2010,〈邁向開放?抑或走入封閉? 東協主義與十加三的發展〉,《亞太通訊研究》,8: 33-67。 宋燕輝, 2016,〈「南海仲裁案」各方反應與可能影響〉,《 展望與探索》,14(8): 16。 宋鎮照,2010,〈東協加一自由貿易區啟動對區域政經發展的衝擊:機會與挑戰〉,《展望與探索》,8(2): 15-21。 李國雄,1995,〈東協安全機制的演變與區域秩序〉,《問題與研究》, 34(9): 35-39。 李瓊莉,2015,〈亞太區域經濟構築中的東協中心性〉,《遠景基金會季刊》,16(4):71-113。 林廷輝,2017 ,〈對中國強制手段的抗衡與扈從─ 菲律賓南海仲裁案〉,《 台灣國際研究季刊》,13(2) : 91-112。 林若雩,2016,〈東協共同體內外安全治理之困境-新區域主義的觀點〉,《淡江國際與區域研究》,5(1):1-43。 夏樂生,2006,〈日本推動東亞地區「經濟夥伴協定」(EPA)的現況與意圖〉,《展望與探索》,4(10):14-20。 張振江,2005,〈「東盟方式」:現實與神話〉,《東南亞研究》,3: 22-27。 郭俊麟,2008,〈東南亞區域整合經驗──東協模式的實踐與檢討〉,《臺灣國際研究季刊》, 4(1):99-126。 陳欣之,1996,〈東協諸國對「中國威脅論」的看法與回應〉,《問題與研究》, 35(11):29-30。 黃宗昊,2010,〈歷史制度論的方法立場與理論建構〉,《問題與研究》,49(3):149。 楊昊,2008,〈新憲章規範下的東協區域主義:回顧與展望〉,《台灣東南亞學刊》,5(1):145-177。 楊昊,2012,〈弱勢領導權對東協核心地位〉,《戰略安全研析》,86:36-44。 廖文義,2006,〈新區域主義與「東協+3」合作架構之建立〉,《復興崗學報》,88: 301-326。 劉德海,2011,〈進入 21 世紀以來的南韓與東協經貿關係〉,《台灣國際研究季刊》,7(1): 147-169。 蔡東杰,2007,〈印度東進政策下的東南亞角色分析〉,《台灣東南亞學刊》4(2): 2-24。 鄧玉英& 高衡權,2021,〈從外溢效果初探區域經濟整合的發展-以RCEP 為例〉,《臺灣國際研究季刊 》,17(2):67-92。 二、 專書論文 李瓊莉,2012,〈東南亞區域整合之基調、特色與挑戰〉,徐遵慈(編),《東南 亞區域整合-台灣觀點》,台北:財團法人中華經濟研究院台灣東南亞國家協會研究中心。 徐遵慈,2015,〈從「東協加一」FTA到RCEP: 成果盤點與展望〉,徐遵慈(編),《東協共同體與台灣:回顧與展望》,台北:財團法人中華經濟研究院台灣東南亞國家協會研究中心。 廖少廉,2003,《東盟區域經濟合作研究》,北京:中國大陸對外經濟貿易出版社,25-26。 蔡東杰,2012,〈東協加三對東南亞區域整合之影響〉,徐遵慈(編),《東南亞區域整合-台灣觀點》,台北:財團法人中華經濟研究院台灣東南亞國家協會研究中心。 三、 學位論文 徐郁芬,2005,〈層疊型區域主義在亞太地區的實踐:以自由貿易區的建構為例〉,台北:政治大學政治學研究所碩士論文。 陳仲沂,2015,〈歐洲整合發展與演進: 權力、利益、認同與制度建構之整合分析〉,台中:中興大學國際政治研究所學位論文。 四、 專書 馬凱碩&孫合記著, 翟崑、 王麗娜等譯,2017,《解讀東協:前進東協,你不可不知道的經濟、政治、歷史背景,以及現況與未來》,台北:遠流。譯自:The ASEAN Miracle:a Catalyst for Peace.National University of Singapore Press. 2007. WTO及RTA中心,2016,〈國際經貿規範動態分析月報2015年9月〉,《中華經濟研究院WTO及RTA中心2015年年報》,台北:財團法人中華經濟研究院WTO及RTA中心。 WTO及RTA中心,2018,〈國際經貿規範動態分析月報2017年5月〉,《中華經濟研究院WTO及RTA中心2017年年報》,台北:財團法人中華經濟研究院WTO及RTA中心。 WTO及RTA中心,2019,〈中華經濟研究院WTO及RTA中心2018年年報〉,台北:財團法人中華經濟研究院WTO及RTA中心。 WTO及RTA中心,2021,〈中華經濟研究院WTO及RTA中心2020年年報〉,台北:財團法人中華經濟研究院WTO及RTA中心。 五、 網路資料 工商時報,2019,〈阻被日踢出「白名單」 南韓向東協討救兵〉,https://ctee.com.tw/news/global/124551.html,2022/10/27。 台灣東南亞國家協會研究中心,2019,〈東協簡介〉,中華經濟研究院網站,https://web.wtocenter.org.tw/Node.aspx?id=66,2022/3/8。 台灣東南亞國家協會研究中心,2021,〈東協加六〉,中華經濟研究院網站, https://www.aseancenter.org.tw/%E6%9D%B1%E5%8D%94%E5%8A%A0%E5%85%AD,2022/3/7。 吳玉瑩,2014,〈從東協加一到RCEP: RCEP發展與議題〉,中華經濟研究員 WTO及RTA中心,https://event.motc.gov.tw/fckdowndoc?file=/3RCEP.pdf&flag=doc,2022/3/30。 吳泰毅,2010,〈東協-澳洲-紐西蘭自由貿易區2010年元月1日起生效〉,財團法人中華經濟研究院台灣東南亞國家協會研究中心網站,https://www.aseancenter.org.tw/post/東協-澳洲-紐西蘭自由貿易區2010年元月1日起生效,2022/4/18。 宋鎮照,2020,〈印度與區域全面經濟夥伴協定(RCEP)的政經關係分析:參與或不參與是一個問題?〉,台北論壇網站,https://www.taipeiforum.org.tw/article_d.php?lang=tw&tb=3&cid=6&id=2908,2022/4/21。 林士清,2019,〈RCEP談判上充滿詭譎多變的氣氛:中國、印度與日本的經貿戰略較勁〉,北美智權官網,http://www.naipo.com/Portals/1/web_tw/Knowledge_Center/Editorial/IPNC_190619_1504.htm,2022/4/17。 林行健, 2017,〈RCEP參與國將提新貿易條件 加速談判〉,中央社,https://wto.cnfi.org.tw/news_detail.php?c_id=30425,2022/10/22。 洪寶山,2020,〈徐遵慈:印度煞車RCEP台灣路?〉,中華經濟研究院網頁,https://www.cier.edu.tw/news/detail/59375,2022/11/30。 徐遵慈,2019,〈108年5月份國際經貿規範動態分析〉,中華經濟研究院WTO與RTA中心,https://web.wtocenter.org.tw/Page.aspx?pid=325166&nid=73,2022/10/29。 徐子軒,2019,〈向東進或向西轉?印度會永久告別RCEP?〉,UDN官網,https://opinion.udn.com/opinion/story/120491/4165117,2022/4/20。 葉蕙君、林芩妤,2015,〈104年8月份國際經貿規範動態分析〉,WTO與RTA中心中華經濟研究院網站,https://web.wtocenter.org.tw/Page.aspx?nid=121&pid=269439,2022/11/24。 梁婷婷,2012,〈RCEP背后的中國與美國〉,新浪財金官網,http://finance.sina.com.cn/roll/20121123/233613782442.shtml,2022/5/11。 經濟部國際貿易局,2019,〈CPTPP簡介〉,經濟部國貿局網頁,https://cptpp.trade.gov.tw/Files/Pages/Attaches/2042/1080401_CPTPP簡介.pdf,2022/9/26。 經濟部國貿局,2022,〈紐西蘭(New Zealand)經貿檔〉,經濟部國貿局網頁,https://www.trade.gov.tw/Files/PageFile/725566/725566ofcbz20220815144447.pdf,2022/11/24。 駐印度台北經濟文化中心經濟組,2020,〈南亞研究學者提出「供應鏈復甦倡議(Resilient Supply Chain Initiative, RSCI)」對RCEP影響之看法〉,經濟部國貿局,https://www.trade.gov.tw/Pages/Detail.aspx?nodeid=45&pid=704532,2022/4/15。 羅國嘉,2020,〈中印衝突再擴大 印度揚言退出RCEP 不跟中國玩了〉,https://newtalk.tw/news/view/2020-07-06/431513,2022/5/24。 BBC中文網,2019,〈中美貿易戰影響東南亞國家:「看似受益,其實置身長遠風險」〉,https://www.bbc.com/zhongwen/trad/business-48866430,2022/5/24。 貳、 英文部分 一、 期刊論文 Abbot, Kenneth W. & Duncan Snidal. 1998. “Why States Act through Formal International Organizations.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 47(1): 3-32. Acharya, Amitav. 1997. “Ideas, identity, and institution‐building: From the ‘ASEAN. Way’ to the ‘Asia‐Pacific Way'?” The Pacific Review 10: 319-346. Acharya, Amitav. 2002. “Regionalism and the Emerging World Order: Sovereignty, Autonomy, Identity.” New Regionalisms in the Global Political Economy 20-32. Acharya, Amitav. 2014. “Power Shift or Paradigm Shift? China's Rise and Asia's. Emerging Security Order.” International Studies Quarterly 58(1):158-173. Acharya, Amitav. 2017. “The Myth of ASEAN Centrality?” Contemporary Southeast Asia: A Journal of International and Strategic Affairs 39(2): 273-279. Amable, Bruno.2000. “Institutional Complementarity and Diversity of Social Systems of Innovation and Production.” Review of International Political Economy 7(4): 645-687. Athukorala, P.C. 2011. “Production Networks and Trade Patterns in East Asia: Regionalization or Globalization?” Asian Economic Papers 10(1): 65-95. Beeson, Mark. 2013. “Living with Giants: ASEAN and the Evolution of Asian Regionalism.” TRaNS: Trans-Regional and-National Studies of Southeast Asia 1(2): 303-322. Bong, A., & Premaratne, G. 2018. “Regional Integration and Economic Growth in Southeast Asia.” Sage Journals 19(6): 1403-1415. Buszynski, Leszek. 1997. “ASEAN's New Challenges.” Pacific Affair 70(4): 555-577. Caballero-Anthony, M. 2014. “Understanding ASEAN's centrality: bases and prospects in an evolving regional architecture.” The Pacific Review 27(4): 563-584. Calder, Kent &Min Ye. 2004. “Regionalism and Critical Junctures: Explaining the “Organization Gap” in Northeast Asia” Journal of East Asian Studies 4(2): 191-226. Chalermpalanupap, Termsak. 2014. “ASEAN Managing External Political and Security Relations.” South Asian Affair 53-75. Cheng, Joseph. 2013. “China’s regional strategy and challenges in East Asia.” China Perspectives 53-65. Chia, Siow Yue. 2011. “Association of Southeast Asian Nations Economic Integration: Developments and Challenges.” Asian Economic Policy Review 6(1): 43-63. Chin, Gregory & Richard Stubbs. 2011. “China, Regional Institution-Building and the China-ASEAN Free Trade Area.” Review of International Political Economy 18(3): 277-298. Chin, Gregory. 2012. “Responding to the Global Financial Crisis: The Evolution of. Asian Regionalism and Economic Globalization.” Asian Development Bank Institute 343. Collier, David. 2011. “Understanding Process Tracing.” PS: Political Science &. Politics 44(4): 823-830. Dalpino, Catharin. 2009.“Southeast Asia in 2008: Challenges Within and Without.” Southeast Asian Affairs: 3-16. Dent, Christopher M. 2005. “Taiwan and the New Regional Political Economy of East Asia.” China Quarterly 182: 385-406. Emmers, Ralf & John Ravenhill. 2011. “The Asian and Global Financial Crises: Consequences for East Asian Regionalism.” Contemporary Politics 17(2): 139-149. Farrell, Henry & Abraham L. Newman. 2010. “Introduction: Making Global Markets: Historical Institutionalism in International Political Economy.” Review of International Political Economy17(4): 609–638. Ferguson, R. James. 2004. “ASEAN Concord II: Policy Prospects for Participant Regional ‘Development’.” Contemporary Southeast Asia 26(3): 395-415. Gourevitch, Peter Alexis. 1996. “Squaring the Circle: The Domestic Sources of International Cooperation.” International Organization 50(2): 349-373. Groten, David. 2017. “China's Approach to Regional Free Trade Frameworks in the Asia Pacific: RCEP as a Prime Example of Economic Diplomacy?” Sicherheit und Frieden (S+ F)/Security and Peace 35(3): 144-149. Hafner-Burton, Emilie M., et al. 2014. “Decision Maker Preferences for International Legal Cooperation.” International Organization 68(4): 845-876. Hafner-Burton, Emilie M., Miles Kahler & Alexander Montgomery. 2009. “Network Analysis for International Relations.” International Organization 63: 559-92. Hall, Peter A. & Rosemary C. R. Taylor. 1996. “Political Science and the Three New. Institutionalism.” Political Studies 44(5): 936-957. Hamanaka,Shintaro. 2014. “Trans-Pacific Partnership versus Comprehensive Economic Partnership: Control of Membership and Agenda Setting.” ADB Working paper Series on regional economic integration: 146. Hasenclever, A., Mayer, P., & Rittberger, V. 1997. “Theories of International Regimes.” Cambridge University Press. Hill, Hal & Jayant Menon. 2010. “ASEAN Economic Integration: Features, Fulfillments, Failures and the Future.” Asian Development Bank: 69. Hopkins, Raymond F. 1976. “The International Role of “Domestic Bureaucracy.” International Organization 30(3): 405-432. Ishikawa, Koichi. 2021. “The ASEAN Economic Community and ASEAN Economic Integration.” Journal of Contemporary East Asia Studies: 10. Ismail, Normaz Wana., et al. 2009. “The effect of ASEAN economic integration on foreign direct investment.” Journal of Economic Integration: 385-407. Jervis, Robert.1999. “Realism, Neoliberalism, and Cooperation: Understanding the Debate.” International Security 24(1): 42-63. Jones, David Martin & Michael L. R. Smith. 2007. “Making Process, Not Progress. ASEAN and the Evolving East Asian Regional Order” International Security 32(1): 148-184. Jones, David Martin & Nicole Jenne. 2016. “Weak States’ Regionalism: ASEAN and the Limits of Security Cooperation in Pacific Asia.” International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 16(2): 209-240. Jones, Lee. 2010. “Still in the ‘Driver’s Seat’, but for How Long? ASEAN’s Capacity for Leadership in East Asian International Relations.” Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs 20(3): 95-113. Katsumata, Hiro. 2003. “Reconstruction of Diplomatic Norms in Southeast Asia: The Case for Strict Adherence to the "ASEAN Way".” Contemporary Southeast Asia 25(1): 104-121. Katsumata, Hiro. 2006. “Establishment of the ASEAN Regional Forum: Constructing a ‘Talking Shop’ or a ‘Norm Brewery’?” The Pacific Review. Kawai, Masahiro & Ganeshan Wignaraja. 2008. “EAFTA or CEPEA: Which Way Forward?” ASEAN Economic Bulletin 25(2): 113-139 Keohane, Robert O. & Joseph S. Nye. 1977. “Power and Interdependence.” Survival 15(4): 158-165. Kimura, Fukunari. 2022. “ASEAN Way: A Framework for Ongoing Commitments to RCEP Success.” East Asia Forum Quarterly 14(1). Koremenos, B., Lipson, C., & Snidal, D. 2001. “The Rational Design of International Institutions.” International organization 55(4): 761-799. Kraft, Herman Joseph S. 2017. “Great power dynamics and the waning of ASEAN centrality in regional security.” Asian Politics & Policy 9(4): 597-612. Krasner, Stephen D.1976. “State Power and the Structure of Foreign Trade.” World Politcs 28(3): 317-47. Kucik, Jeffrey. 2012. “The Domestic Politics of Institutional Design: Producer Preferences Over Trade Agreement Rules.” Economics & Politics 24(2): 95-118. Lake, David A. 1996. “Anarchy, Hierarchy and the Variety of International Relations.” International Organization 50(1): 1-33. Lake, David A. 2009. “Open Economy Politics: A Critical Review.” The Review of International Organization 4(3): 219-244. Lamb, Alister. 1968. “The McMahon Line: A Study in Relations Between India, China and Tibet, 1904 to 1914.” India Quarterly 23(2):196-201. Le Thu, Huong. 2018. “China' s dual strategy of coercion and inducement towards ASEAN.” The Pacific Review 32(1): 20-36. Leifer, Michael. 1996. “The ASEAN Regional Forum: Extending ASEAN’s Model of Regional Security.” Adelphi Paper 302: 18-19. Levi, Margaret. 1997. “A Model, A Method, and a Map: Rational Choice in Comparative and Historical Analysis.” Comparative politics: Rationality, culture, and structure: 28. Lim, Robyn. 1998. “The ASEAN Regional Forum: Building on Sand.” Contemporary Southeast Asia 20(2): 116. Mahadevan, Renuka & Anda Nugroho. 2019. “Can the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership Minimize the Harm from the United States-China Trade War?” World Economy 42(11): 3148-67. Mearsheimer, John J. 1994. “The False Promise of International Institutions.” International security 19(3): 5-49. Milner, Helen V. &Keiko Kubota. 2005. “Why the Move to Free Trade? Democracy and Trade Policy in the Developing Countries.” International Organization 59(1): 107–43. Mueller, Lukas Maximilian. 2019. “ASEAN Centrality Under Threat–The Cases of RCEP and Connectivity.” Journal of Contemporary East Asia Studies 8(2): 177-198. Mueller, Lukas Maximilian. 2021. “Challenges to ASEAN Centrality and Hedging in Connectivity Governance—Regional and National Pressure Points.” The Pacific Review 34(5): 747-777. Nicita, A. 2021. “An Assessment of the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) Tariff Concessions.” United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) Research Papers: 73. Nogue ́s, Julio J. & Rosalinda Quintanilla. 1993. “Latin America’s Integration and the Multilateral Trading System.” See de Melo & Panagariya: 278-313. Nye, Joseph S. 1988. “Neorealism and Neoliberalism.” World politics 40(2): 235-251. Park, Cyn-Young, Peter A. Petri, and Michael G. Plummer. 2021. “Economic Implications of the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership for Asia and the Pacific.” ADB Economics Working Paper Series: 639. Petri, Peter A & Michael G. Plummer. 2020. “East Asia Decouples from the United States: Trade War, COVID-19, and East Asia’s New Trade Blocs.” Peterson Institute for International Economics. Petri, Peter A., et al. 2017. “Going it Alone in the Asia-Pacific: Regional Trade Agreements Without the United States.” Peterson Institute for International Economics: 17-10. Pierson, Paul. 1996. “The Path to European Integration: A Historical Institutionalist Analysis.” Comparative political studies 29(2):123-163. Pierson, Paul. 2000. “Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of. Politics.” American political science review 94(2): 251-267. Rapkin, David P. 2001. “The United States, Japan, and the Power to Block: The APEC and AMF Cases.” The Pacific Review 14(3): 373-410. Snitwongse, Kusuma. 1998. “Thirty Years of ASEAN: Achievements through Political Cooperation.” The Pacific Review 11(2): 183-194. Tan, See Seng. 2007. “Not Quite Beyond the ‘ASEAN Way’? Southeast Asia’s Evolution to Rules-based Management of Intra-ASEAN Differences.” Building ASEAN Community: Political-Security and Socio-Cultural Reflections: 67-87. Tran, Hiep Xuan., et al. 2020. “China-ASEAN Trade Relations: A Study of Determinants and Potentials.” The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics, and Business 7(9): 209-217. Urata, Shujiro. 2002. “Globalization and the Growth in the Free Trade Agreement.” Asia Pacific Review 9(1): 20-32. Wang, Heng. 2017. “The RCEP and its Investment Rules: Learning from Past Chinese FTAs.” The Chinese Journal of Global Governance 3(2): 160-181. Wilson, Jeffrey D. 2015. “Mega-Regional Trade Deals in the Asia-Pacific: Choosing between the TPP and RCEP?” Journal of Contemporary Asia 45(2): 345-353. Xie, Zhihai. 2021. “Examining the Role of Institutions in Regional Economic Integration: A Comparison Between Europe and Asia.” Economic Integration in Asia and Europe: Lessons and Policies: 538. Ye, Min. 2015. “China and Competing Cooperation in Asia-Pacific: TPP, RCEP, and the New Silk Road.” Asian Security 11(3): 206-224. Young, Oran R.1989. “International Cooperation: Building Regimes for Natural Resources and the Environment.” New York: Cornell University Press 84-89. Yuzhu, Wang.2013. “The RCEP Initiative and ASEAN Centrality.” China Int'l Stud 42: 119-132. Zhongying, Pang & Hongying Wang. 2013. “Debating International Institutions and Global Governance: The Missing Chinese IPE Contribution.” Review of International Political Economy 20(6): 1189-1214. 二、 專書論文 Capie, David& Paul Evans. 2003. “The ASEAN Way.” In The 2nd ASEAN Reader,ed. Siddique, Sharon & Sree Kumar. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies: 45-51. Calder, K. E. 2008. “Critical Junctures and the Contours of Northeast Asian Regionalism.” In K. E. Calder and F. Fukuyama (eds). East Asian Multilateralism: Prospects for Regional Stability, Baltimore: The John’s Hopkins University Press: 15-39. Chia, Siow Yue. 2003. “East Asian Regionalism and ASEAN-Japan Economic Partnership” In ASEAN-Japan Cooperation: A Foundation for East Asian Community. Tokyo: Japan Center for International Exchange: 75-94. Djiwandono, J. S. 1988. “Regional Security Cooperation: An ASEAN Perspective.” In Pacific Regional Security: The 1985 Pacific Symposium. Washington, DC: National Defense University Press. Oba, Mie. 2019. “RCEP Negotiations for the Reshaping of the Liberal Economic Order.” In Trade and Economic Connectivity in the Age of Uncertainty: Panorama Insights into Asian and European Affairs. Singapore: Konrad Adenauer Stiftung/ Regional Programme Political Dialogue Asia. Rillo, Aladdin D., Anna Maria Rosario D. RObenio &Salvador M. Buban. 2022. “The Story of RCEP: History, Negotiations, Structure, and Future Directions.” In Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP): Implications, Challenges, and Future Growth of East Asia and ASEAN, ed. Fukunari Kimura, Shandre Thangavelu and Dionisius Narjoko. Indonesia: ERIA. Sukegawa, Seiya. 2019. “RCEP and Japan’s East Asia Production Network.” In Economic Integration and Protectionism in Asia: The Changing Composition of the Trade Order, ed.Koichi Ishikawa, Keiichi Umada, and Kazushi Shimizu. Bunshin-do. Yarborough, Beth V. & Robert M. Yarborough. 1992. “Cooperation and Governance in International Trade.” In Cooperation and Governance in International Trade. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 三、 專書 Acharya, Amitav. 2009. Constructing a Security Community in Southeast Asia: ASEAN and the Problem of Regional Order. London: Routledge. Balassa, Bela. 1961. The Theory of Economic Integration. Illinois: Homewood. Chase, Kerry A. 2009. Trading blocs: States, Firms, and Regions in the World Economy. University of Michigan Press. Feith, Herbert. 1962. The Decline of Constitutional Democracy in Indonesia. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Gilpin, Robert. 1981. War and Change in World Politics.Cambridge University Press. Gilpin, Robert. 1987. The Political Economy of International Relations.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Haacke, Jürgen. 2003.ASEAN’s Diplomatic and Security Culture:Origins, Development and Prospects. London: Routledge. Haas, Ernst B.1958. The Uniting of Europe: Political, Social, and Economical Forces, 1950-1957. University of Notre Dame Press. Haftendorn, Helga ed. 1999. Imperfect Unions: Security Institutions over Time and Space. OUP Oxford. Keohane, Robert O.1984. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in The World. Political Economy. Princeton University Press. Narine, Shaun. 2002. Explaining ASEAN: Regionalism in Southeast Asia. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers. Plummer, Michael G. & Chia Siow Yue. 2009. Realizing the ASEAN Economic. Community: A Comprehensive Assessment. Institute of Southeast Asian Studies. Stephen M. Walt. 1987. The Origins of Alliance. Ithaka: Cornell University Press. Waltz, Kenneth. 1959. The Man, the State and War: A Theoretical Analysis. New York: Columbia University Press. Waltz, Kenneth.1979. Theory of International Politics. New York: McGraw-Hill. 四、 網路資料 Akimoto, Daisuke. 2021. “The RCEP Conundrum: Japan Awaits India’s Return.” in https://thediplomat.com/2021/08/the-rcep-conundrum-japan-awaits-indias-return/. Latest update 14 April 2022. ASEAN Secretariat. 1988. “The ASEAN Declaration(The Bangkok Declaration)” in https://agreement.asean.org/media/download/20140117154159.pdf. Latest update 30 November 2022. ASEAN.1998. “Opening Statement by Professor S Jayakumar Minister for Foreign Affairs and Minister for Law of the Republic of Singapore at the 31st ASEAN Ministerial Meeting 24 July 1998, Malina. Stick to Basics.”in https://asean.org/opening-statement-by-professor-s-jayakumar-minister-for-foreign-affairs-and-minister-for-law-of-the-republic-of-singapore-at-the-31st-asean-ministerial-meeting-24-july-1998-manila-stick-to-basics/. Latest update 30 November 2022. ASEAN. 1976. “Treaty of Amity and Cooperation in Southeast Asia (TAC).” in https://asean.org/our-communities/asean-political-security-community/outward-looking-community/treaty-of-amity-and-cooperation-in-southeast-asia-tac/. Latest update 30 November 2022. ASEAN. 2003. “Declaration of ASEAN Concord II (Bali Concord II).” in https://asean.org/speechandstatement/declaration-of-asean-concord-ii-bali-concord-ii/. Latest update 30 November 2022. ASEAN. 2007. “The ASEAN Charter.” in https://asean.org/wp-content/uploads/images/archive/publications/ASEAN-Charter.pdf. Latest update 30 November 2022. ASEAN. 2012.“Guiding Principles and Objectives for Negotiating the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership” in https://asean.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/RCEP-Guiding-Principles-public-copy.pdf ASEAN. 2023.“Secretary-General of ASEAN participates in 20th Shangri-La Dialogue.”in https://asean.org/secretary-general-of-asean-participates-in-the-20th-shangri-la-dialogue/. 20 June 2023. ASEAN PLUS THREE. “About ASEAN+3.” in https://aseanplusthree.asean.org/.Latest update 9 March 2022. ASEAN.ORG. “Building the ASEAN Community: ASEAN-Korea Free Trade Area. Building Strong Economic Partnerships.” in https://www.asean.org/wp-content/uploads/images/2015/October/outreach-document/Edited%20AKFTA.pdf. Latest update 6 March 2022. ASEAN.ORG. “Significance of the ASEAN Charter.” in https://asean.org/about-asean/asean-charter/. Latest update 6 March 2022. Australian Government Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade. “Background to the ASEAN–Australia–New Zealand Free Trade Agreement.” in https://www.dfat.gov.au/trade/agreements/in-force/aanzfta/Pages/background-to-the-asean-australia-new-zealand-free-trade-area. Latest update 8 March 2022. Basu, Nyanima. 2020. “India ‘won’t review’ decision not to join RCEP as members prepare to sign pact by 2020-end.” in https://theprint.in/diplomacy/india-wont-review-decision-not-to-join-rcep-as-members-prepare-to-sign-pact-by-2020-end/454628/. Latest update 24 May 2022. Bernal, Gabriela. 2021. “South Korea’s signing of RCEP and future implications.” in https://asiapowerwatch.com/south-koreas-signing-of-rcep-and-future-implications/. Latest update 15 April 2022. Business Standard. 2020. “Review of India-ASEAN Goods Agreement to Help. Realise Trade Potential: Puri” in https://www.business-standard.com/article/economy-policy/review-of-india-asean-goods-agreement-to-help-realise-trade-potential-puri-120080401562_1.html . Latest update 26 October 2022. Cabinet Secretariat of the Republic of Indonesia. 2020. “President Jokowi Highlights Importance of ASEAN Countries Cooperation.” in https://setkab.go.id/en/president-jokowi-highlights-importance-of-asean-countries-cooperation/. 20 June 2023. East Asia Forum. 2016. “Will the TPP and OBOR challenge ASEAN centrality?” in https://www.eastasiaforum.org/2016/05/20/will-the-tpp-and-obor-challenge-asean-centrality/. Latest update: October 7 2022. Ferrier, Kyle. 2020. “Could RCEP Help Improve South Korea-Japan Relations?” in https://thediplomat.com/2020/11/could-rcep-help-improve-south-korea-japan- relations/. Latest update October 11 2022. Gilligan, Michael J. 2015. “The Transactions Costs Approach to Understanding International Institutions: An Intellectual Legacy of Robert O. Keohane” in https://www.princeton.edu/~hmilner/Conference_files/KEOHANE/gilligan.pdf. Latest update 30 November 2022. Kawashima, Shin.2020. “Japan’s Painful Choice on RCEP.” in https://thediplomat.com/2020/08/japans-painful-choice-on-rcep/. Latest update 14 April 2022. Martin, Nik. 2021. “RCEP: Asia readies world's largest trade deal” in https://www.dw.com/en/rcep-asia-readies-worlds-largest-trade-deal/a-60267980. Latest update 14 April 2022. METI Journal. 2021. “Former head of regional economic partnership negotiations looks back on negotiation process.” in https://meti-journal.japantimes.co.jp/2021-06-24/. Latest update 20 October 2022. Medina, Ayman Falak. 2021. “ASEAN’s Free Trade Agreements: An Overview.” ASEAN Briefing. in https://www.aseanbriefing.com/news/aseans-free-trade-agreements-an-overview/. Latest update 6 March 2022. New Zealand Foreign Affair & Trade. “AANZFTA overview.” in https://www.mfat.govt.nz/tw/trade/free-trade-agreements/free-trade-agreements-in-force/asean-australia-new-zealand-free-trade-agreement-aanzfta/aanzfta-overview/. Latest update 8 March 2022. New Zealand Foreign Affairs & Trade. “Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership.” in https://www.mfat.govt.nz/en/trade/free-trade-agreements/free-trade-agreements-in-force/regional-comprehensive-economic-partnership-rcep/rcep-overview.17 April 2022. New Zealand Foreign Affairs &Trade. “Preserving Our Right to Regulate.” in https://www.mfat.govt.nz/tw/trade/nz-trade-policy/preserving-our-right-to-regulate/. 18 April 2022. Nikkei Asia. 2022. “RCEP stirs higher hopes for Japan than China or South Korea: poll.” in https://asia.nikkei.com/Business/Business-trends/RCEP-stirs-higher-hopes-for-Japan-than-China-or-South-Korea-poll. Latest update 14 April 2022. Oblitas, Moyra. 2021.“RCEP & CPTPP: shaping a new global order?” in https://classe-internationale.com/2021/04/27/rcep-cptpp-shaping-a-new-global-order/. Latest update 17 October 2022. Pardo, Ramon Pacheco. 2020. “Korea Chair Explains - South Korea and the RCEP.” in https://brussels-school.be/publications/other-publications/korea-chair-explains-south-korea-and-rcep. Latest update 15 April 2022. Petri, Peter A., & Plummer, Michael. 2020. “RCEP: A New Trade Agreement that. Will Shape Global Economics and Politics.” in https://www.brookings.edu/blog/order-from-chaos/2020/11/16/rcep-a-new-trade-agreement-that-will-shape-global-economics-and-politics/. Latest update 30 November 2022. Ranald, Patricia. 2019. “Suddenly, the World’s Biggest Trade Agreement Won’t Allow Corporations to Sue Governments. in https://theconversation.com/suddenly-the-worlds-biggest-trade-agreement-wont-allow-corporations-to-sue-governments-123582. Latest update 12 October 2022. Ranald, Patricia. 2020. “We’ve Just Signed the World’s Biggest Trade Deal, but What is the RCEP? ” in https://theconversation.com/weve-just-signed-the-worlds-biggest-trade-deal-but-what-is-the-rcep-150082. 16 April 2022. RCEP. 2012. “Guiding Principles and Objectives for Negotiating the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership.” in https://asean.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/RCEP-Guiding-Principles-public-copy.pdf. Latest update 22 March 2022. RCEP. 2018. “RCEP Ministerial Meeting Joint Media Statement.” in https://www.trade.gov.tw/Files/PageFile/650246/650246b0om020220808150330.pdf. Latest update 23 October 2022. RCEP. 2019. “Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement.” in https://rcepsec.org/legal-text/. Latest update 30 November 2022. RCEP. 2020. “RCEP Agreement chapter 10.” in https://rcepsec.org/legal-text/. Latest. update 13 November 2022. Reuters. 2021. “RCEP trade pact seen boosting Japan's GDP by 2.7%.” in https://www.reuters.com/article/us-japan-economy-rcep-idUSKBN2BB193. Latest update 14 April 2022. Staff, Pon. 2019. “The Anchoring Effect and How it Can Impact Your Negotiation.” in https://www.pon.harvard.edu/daily/negotiation-skills-daily/the-drawbacks-of-goals/. Latest update 19 November 2022. Suvannaphakdy, Sithanonxay. 2021. “RCEP Will Drive ASEAN Economic Recovery.” in https://thediplomat.com/2021/12/rcep-will-drive-asean-economic-recovery/. Latest update 16 May 2022. TEARA The Encyclopedia of New Zealand. “Treaty of Waitangi.” in https://teara.govt.nz/en/treaty-of-waitangi/page-1.Latest update 18 April 2022. Twyford, Hon Phil. 2021. “New Zealand ratifies RCEP, agreement to enter into force. early next year.” in https://www.beehive.govt.nz/release/new-zealand-ratifies-rcep-agreement-enter-force-early-next-year. 20 April 2022. The Jakarta Post. 2019. “Trade Spat Tops Jokowiʼs Agenda at ASEAN, G20.” in https://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2019/06/20/trade-spattops-jokowi-s-agenda-asean-g20-us-china-trade-war.html. Latest update October18 2022. The World Bank. “The Role of Trade in Ending Poverty.” in https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/trade/publication/the-role-of-trade-in-ending-poverty. Latest update 11 May 2022. The Mainichi. 2018.“RCEP ministers OK package of deliverables to be reached by year-end.” in https://www.bilaterals.org/?rcep-ministers-ok-package-of&lang=en. Latest update 24 October 2022. Wong, Frank Ko-Ho. 2018. “What the CPTPP and RCEP Mean for China and Asia-Pacific Trade.” in https://www.china-briefing.com/news/cptpp-rcep-impact-china-asia-pacific-trade/. Latest update: October 16 2022. World Economic Forum. 2018. “The ‘ASEAN Way’: what it is, how it must change for the future.” in https://europeansting.com/2018/09/10/the-asean-way-what-it-is-how-it-must-change-for-the-future/. Latest update 21 March 2022. Yee, William Yuen. 2021. “Asia-Pacific economic explainer: How the China-friendly.RCEP arose after the U.S. abandoned TPP.” in https://thechinaproject.com/2021/01/07/asia-pacific-economic-explainer/.Latest update October 16, 2022. | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/88205 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 區域整合在全球化之下如火如荼的進行。在東亞區域整合中,東協佔據相當指標性的地位。除了東協本身的區域整合外,其也因著新區域主義向外擴張來拓展自身於區域的領導能力與貿易量。而於2022年1月1日正式生效的RCEP,為包含了東協十國與其他五國的區域經濟組織,其成立為亞洲區域整合及自由經濟貿易體系添上新的一頁。觀察RCEP的談判內容及歷程,可以得知其成立相當不易,當中有許多延宕遲滯以及成員國間爭執之發生;︁又檢視RCEP的制度內涵與規則,其為四個東協加一自由貿易協定所組成的貿易制度,在每個自由貿易中所規範的自由化程度都有所不同,呈現出一個組織多個制度安排之情形,造就出RCEP制度上的特殊性。這樣的特殊整合情況與強調一體化、標準化的區域主義有所不同,也不禁讓人思考是怎麼樣的情況才造就了這樣的制度安排。
為回答上述問題,本文採用歷史制度論之分析框架,以過程追蹤之方式觀察RCEP整體談判過程,以析論東協中心性在RCEP成立及制度上的相關影響。另外,從RCEP制度表現上,也藉此得知東協國家的影響程度。最後,輔以反事實推論的方法,進一步檢視東協中心性與RCEP之因果關係。 本研究結果顯示,東協中心性是造就RCEP成立相當重要的因素。具體事實表現在每次國際間發生重要事件,又或是在談判歷程中遲滯碰壁之下,東協都試圖扮演談判推進者及信心喊話者的角色。另外,東協各國在擔任東協主席國時,對於談判的態度也大大影響相關進度。而從RCEP的制度表現上,東協穿梭於各個談判小組,並且也擔任TNC主席,對於議題設定上有相當大的影響力。最後,觀察在沒有東協中心性制度發揮上,區域整合可能就未能如現今的樣貌,可推論出東協中心性對於RCEP影響之深。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Regional integration is in full swing under the phenomenon of globalization. Among the integration in east Asia, ASEAN is in the most significant position. ASEAN not only undergoes the regional integration, it also expands its regional leadership and trading volumes as the heating of neo Regionalism.
Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership(RCEP), established on the first day of January in 2022, is a regional economic organization contains ten ASEAN countries and other five countries. The establishment of RCEP turns over the new leaves in Asian regional integration and free trade system. As we looked deeply into the negotiation process of RCEP, it was obvious that its establishment was not easy as there were many postpones and happening of conflicts between RCEP members. Moreover, RCEP is the trading institution that is composed of four ASEAN plus one free trade agreements. The level of freedoms in each agreement are different, this shows the situation that there is more than one institutional arrangement in one organization, which demonstrates the specialty of RCEP institution. This kind of institutional arrangement is totally different from that of regionalism which emphasizes the importance of unification and standardization. This raises the question of what kind of situation brings up the institutional arrangement. To answer the question above, this thesis adopts historical institutionalism as the analytic framework, following the perspective on path dependence to inspect the whole negotiation process of RCEP. On the one way, it can analyze the influence of the ASEAN centrality to the establishment and institution of RCEP. On the other way, it can tell how deep of ASEAN’s influence in RCEP institution. This thesis also uses the counterfactual inference as a way to enact the robust test to ensure the causal relationship between ASEAN centrality and RCEP. The finding demonstrates that ASEAN centrality is essential to the establishment of RCEP. The specific fact shows that whenever the happening of significant events, or when RCEP members encountered the deadlocks during the process of negotiation, ASEAN always tried to be the role of negotiation facilitator or pep talker. Moreover, the attitude of the rotating chairmanship of ASEAN can influence the progress of negotiation. As for the institutional arrangement of RCEP, ASEAN involves in negotiating team all the time, it also serves as the chair of TNC who has a great agenda-setting power. Last but not least, from the counterfactual inference, we can infer that ASEAN centrality had a great influence on RCEP. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2023-08-08T16:46:24Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2023-08-08T16:46:24Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 論文口試委員審定書 I
謝辭 II 摘要 IV ABSTRACT V 略語表 VII 目錄 VIII 圖目錄 X 表目錄 XI 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究動機與研究目的 1 第二節 研究問題 5 第三節 文獻回顧 6 第四節 研究架構與研究方法 23 第五節 研究範圍與限制 27 第六節 章節安排 28 第二章 東協整合至RCEP簡史 31 第一節 東協與RCEP成立前之國際局勢 31 第二節 東協背景與成立目的 33 第三節 區域經濟整合:東協加一 37 第四節 區域經濟整合:東協加三與加六 44 第五節 小結 46 第三章 東協模式與成員國制度偏好差異 47 第一節 東協模式與東協中心性:內涵及運作模式 47 第二節 RCEP如何受東協中心性之影響 50 第三節 RCEP成員國之策略偏好 52 第四節 小結 63 第四章 RCEP建立之國際結構與國家互動關係 65 第一節 RCEP發展之重大外在事件 66 第二節 RCEP歷史因素之路徑發展 72 第三節 RCEP發展歷程之路徑持續與挑戰 90 第四節 小結 103 第五章 RCEP體制內涵:東協中心性制度展現 105 第一節 RCEP談判體制 105 第二節 反事實推論 113 第三節 小結 116 第六章 結論 119 第一節 研究發現與貢獻 119 第二節 東協中心性對於RCEP後續影響 124 第三節 RCEP未來發展樣貌 125 參考文獻 128 附錄一 149 附錄二 153 附錄三 162 | - |
dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
dc.title | 區域全面經濟夥伴協定(RCEP)與東協中心性: 一個歷史制度論的分析 | zh_TW |
dc.title | RCEP and ASEAN Centrality: A Historical Institutionalist Approach | en |
dc.type | Thesis | - |
dc.date.schoolyear | 111-2 | - |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
dc.contributor.coadvisor | 陶儀芬 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.coadvisor | Yi-Fen Tao | en |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 楊昊;張登及 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Hao Yang;Teng-Chi Chang | en |
dc.subject.keyword | 東協中心性,區域全面經濟夥伴協定,歷史制度論,區域整合,制度特殊性, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | ASEAN Centrality,Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP),historical institutionalism,regional integration,institutional distinctiveness, | en |
dc.relation.page | 169 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202301605 | - |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(限校園內公開) | - |
dc.date.accepted | 2023-07-21 | - |
dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | - |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 政治學系 | - |
顯示於系所單位: | 政治學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-111-2.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 3.48 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。