請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/88185完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 藍文欽 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Wen-Chin Lan | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 陳威宇 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Wei-Yu Chen | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-08-08T16:41:05Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-03-25 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2023-08-08 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2023 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2023-07-16 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | 中文文獻
于第、陳昭珍（2015）。編目館員在職訓練課程探討。大學圖書館，19(1)，70–90。https://doi.org/doi.org/10.6146/univj.19-1.04 中國圖書館學會（2002）。我國圖書館員專業倫理守則。http://www.lac.org.tw/law/12 牛惠曼、簡秀娟（2014）。各國因應RDA相關措施之探討。圖書與資訊學刊，6(1)，51–76。 王宏德（1996）。談網路資訊倫理。臺北市立圖書館館訊，14(1)，86–94。 王怡璇（2011）。大學圖書館績效評估指標之研究［未出版之碩士論文］。國立臺灣師範大學圖書資訊學研究所。 王美鴻（1997）。疊慧法：以圖書館學與資訊科學的應用為例。圖書與資訊學刊，23，45–60。 王梅玲（1996）。圖書館採訪工作的倫理。臺北市立圖書館館訊，14(1)，25–37。 王梅玲（2007a）。網路時代資訊組織人員專業能力之研究。圖書資訊學研究，1(2)，91–116。 王梅玲（2007b）。臺灣資訊組織與Metadata教育之研究。圖書館學與資訊科學，33(1)，103–122。https://jlis.glis.ntnu.edu.tw/ojs/index.php/jlis/article/view/492 王梅玲、周芷涵（2021）。2020-2024圖書館與資訊專業能力模式及未來工作疊慧研究。公共圖書館研究，14，46–90。 王梅玲、張艾琦（2018）。我國編目館員編目專業能力認知與工作績效研究。圖書資訊學研究，12 (2)，63–109。 王梅玲、謝寶煖（2014）。圖書資訊學導論（二版）。五南。 王雲東（2014）。德菲法。於社會研究方法：量化與質性取向及其應用（頁301–309）。威仕曼文化。 朱建民、葉保強、李瑞全（2005）。應用倫理與現代社會。國立空中大學。 朱家榮（2010）。資訊倫理研究初探。臺灣圖書館管理季刊，6(1)，106–120。 吳美美（2000）。資訊自由與圖書館發展。資訊傳播與圖書館學，7(1)，11–22。 吳寂絹、邱銘心（2011）。「資訊倫理」在國內圖書資訊學領域的發展概況。圖書資訊學刊，9(2)，123–156。https://doi.org/10.6182/jlis.2011.9(2).123 吳清山、林天佑（2003）。德懷術。教育研究月刊，92，127。 吳雅玲（2001）。德懷術及其在課程研究上的應用。教育研究，9，297–306。 吳瑠璃（1995）。編目。於胡述兆（編），圖書館學與資訊科學大辭典（頁2214–2215）。漢美。 呂明珠（2016）。從大學圖書館績優編目館員職涯發展歷程探討其專業成長。圖資與檔案學刊，8(2)，47–76。https://doi.org/10.6575/JILA.2016.89.03 李德竹（編）（1985）。圖書館學暨資訊科學字彙。漢美。 李德竹、莊道明（1996）。我國大學圖書館資訊倫理認知與問題之研究。臺北市立圖書館館訊，14(1)，1–17。 杜双玉、洪念民（2019）。應用修正式德爾菲法及層級分析法探討臺灣旅館選址因素。觀光休閒學報，25(3)，275–300。https://doi.org/10.6267/JTLS.201912_25(3).0002 周中之（2004）。倫理學。人民出版社。 林火旺（2004）。倫理學。五南。 林巧敏、林淑芬（2011）。中文名稱權威資料庫合作發展之探討。檔案季刊，10(1)，52–69。 林素甘（2010）。電子文件檔案價值鑑定基準之研究。教育資料與圖書館學，48(2)，247–268。 林詮紹、周美利（2008）。資訊倫理與應用。應用倫理教學與研究學刊，3(1)，43–60。 柯雲娥（2006）。傳播學門大學生資訊素養能力的研究。圖書與資訊學刊，56，96–116。https://doi.org/10.6575/JoLIS.2006.56.06 胡述兆、王梅玲（2003）。圖書資訊學導論。漢美。 徐少錦、溫克勤（1999）。倫理百科辭典。中國廣播電視出版社。 徐蕙芬（2012）。編目轉型下公共圖書館與合作編目的新契機。臺北市立圖書館館訊，29(4)，33–46。 涂曉晴（2012）。從檔案目錄功能談我國機關檔案立案編目作業。大學圖書館，16(2)，40–59。https://doi.org/10.6146/univj.2012-16-2.03 高君琳（2008）。台灣地區檔案素養評估指標之研究［未出版之碩士論文］。國立政治大學圖書資訊與檔案學研究所。 國立公共資訊圖書館（2018）。國立公共資訊圖書館館藏發展政策。https://www.nlpi.edu.tw/Uploads/107國立公共資訊圖書館發政策.pdf 國立臺灣圖書館（2013）。國立臺灣圖書館館藏發展政策。https://www.ntl.edu.tw/public/Data/482116161071.pdf 國家教育研究院主編（2020）。圖書館學與資訊科學名詞。國家教育研究院。 張慧銖（2009）。Metadata對於組織電子期刊之適用性探討。教育資料與圖書館學，46(3)，351–376。 教育部（2018）。大專校院校務資訊公開平臺。https://udb.moe.edu.tw/DetailReportList/校務類/StatLibary/Index 莊道明（1995）。圖書館專業倫理意義與內涵初探。中國圖書館學會會報，55，27–37。 莊道明（1996）。圖書館專業倫理。文華圖書館管理。 莊道明（1997a）。建構資訊社會的新秩序－資訊倫理。國家政策雙周刊，175，11–12。 莊道明（1997b）。我國學術資訊網路使用及資訊倫理教育之研究［未出版之博士論文］。國立臺灣大學圖書館學研究所。 莊道明（2017）。大學生資訊議題的倫理抉擇：縱貫式研究。圖資與檔案學刊，9(2)，1–19。https://doi.org/10.6575/JILA.2017.91.01 陳亞寧、温達茂（2020）。MARC21鏈結資料化的轉變與應用。教育資料與圖書館學，57(1)，35–72。https://doi.org/doi.org/10.6120/JoEMLS.202003_57(1).0045.RS.AM 陳和琴（2001）。Metadata與數位典藏之研討。大學圖書館，5(2)，2–11。 陳和琴（2006）。新內容標準RDA初探。圖書與資訊學刊，57，19–34。 陳書梅、盧宜辰（2005）。我國公共圖書館施行兒童書目療法服務之研究。圖書與資訊學刊，54，58–83。https://doi.org/10.6575/JoLIS.2005.54.04 陳雅文（1995）。疊慧法。於胡述兆（編），圖書館學與資訊科學大辭典（頁2481–2482）。漢美。 陳龍田、林巧敏（2021）。政府機關電子檔案風險評鑑指標之研究。檔案半年刊，20(1)，16–37。 傅佩榮（1994）。倫理。於蔡美芳（編），人生價值與社會倫理－人文雙月會文稿集（頁161–190）。洪建全基金會。 曾淑賢（2010）。公共圖書館專業倫理探討。臺北市立圖書館館訊，27(3)，1–23。 游家政（1996）。得懷術及其在課程研究上的應用。花蓮師院學報，6，1–24。 馮契（2007）。哲學大辭典（分類修訂本）。上海辭書出版社。 黃奕真（2007）。大學圖書館員對電子期刊採購決策認知因素之研究［未出版之碩士論文］。國立臺灣師範大學圖書資訊學研究所。 黃清琦（2014）。臺灣地形圖的圖名、圖號系統及其與地圖編目的關係。大學圖書館，18(1)，58–82。https://doi.org/doi.org/10.6146/univj.18-1.04 楊若雲（編）（1988）。圖書館學辭典。五洲。 葉重新（2017）。教育研究法（三版）。心理出版社。 潘淑滿（2003）。質性研究：理論與應用。心理出版社。 鄭惠珍（2016）。分類理論在權威控制的應用──以VIAF人名權威紀錄為例。國家圖書館館刊，105年第2期，147–170。 盧宜辰（2005）。我國公共圖書館施行兒童書目療法服務之研究［未出版之碩士論文］。國立臺灣大學圖書資訊學研究所。 謝文全（1978）。得懷術在教育研究上的應用。今日教育，34，35–38。 羅國傑（1993）。中國倫理學百科全書──卷一〈倫理學原理卷〉。吉林人民出版社。 顧力仁（2007）。中國大陸編目中心的現況與發展。國家圖書館館刊，96(2)，193–210。 英文文獻 ACRL Research Planning and Review Committee. (2020). 2020 top trends in academic libraries: A review of the trends and issues affecting academic libraries in higher education. College & Research Libraries News, 81(6), 270–278. Adler, M., & Tennis, J. T. (2013). Toward a taxonomy of harm in knowledge organization systems. Knowledge Organization, 40(4), 266–272. https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2013-4-266 American Library Association. (2021, June 29). Code of ethics. https://www.ala.org/tools/ethics Anderson, J., & Skouvig, L. (Eds.). (2017). The organization of knowledge: Caught between global structures and local meaning. Emerald Publishing Limited. Annas, J. (2001). Ethics. In L. C. Becker & C. B. Becker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of ethics (2nd ed., pp. 485–486). Routledge. Arastoopoor, S., & Ahmadinasab, F. (2019). From personal to corporate and from names to titles: The challenges of Iranian scholars with scientific publications. In J. Sandberg (Ed.), Ethical questions in name authority control (pp. 215–241). Library Juice Press. Arboit, A. E., & Guimarães, J. A. C. (2015). The ethics of knowledge organization and representation from a Bakhtinian perspective. Knowledge Organization, 42(5), 324–331. https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2015-5-324 Association for Library Collections & Technical Services. (1994). Guidelines for ALCTS members to supplement the American Library Association code of ethics, 1994. http://www.ala.org/alcts/resources/alaethics Association for Library Collections & Technical Services. (2006, June 13). Value of Cataloging Librarians. https://www.ala.org/alcts/resources/org/cat/catlibvalue Association for Library Collections & Technical Services. (2016). Draft cataloging competencies blueprint. https://connect.ala.org/communities/community-home/librarydocuments/viewdocument?DocumentKey=A67A871C-2FE6-4F0B-8FD9-C89FED2B5FED%0A Association for Library Collections & Technical Services. (2017a). Core competencies for cataloging and metadata professional librarians. https://alair.ala.org/handle/11213/7853 Association for Library Collections & Technical Services. (2017b, September 20). Power that is Moral: e-Forum Summary. https://alcts.ala.org/news/2017/e-forum-cataloging-ethics/ Bade, D. (2002). The creation and persistence of misinformation in shared library catalogs: Language and subject knowledge in a technological era (Occasional papers no. 211). Publications Office, Graduate School of Library and Information Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Bair, S. (2008). Toward a code of ethics for cataloging. Technical Services Quarterly, 23(1), 13–26. https://doi.org/10.1300/J124v23n01_02 Beall, J. (2009). Racially mixed people, DDC table 5 ethnic and national groups, and MARC 21 bibliographic format field 083. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 47(7), 657–670. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639370903112005 Beghtol, C. (2002). A proposed ethical warrant for global knowledge representation and organization systems. Journal of Documentation, 58(5), 507–532. https://doi.org/10.1108/00220410210441 Beghtol, C. (2005). Ethical decision-making for knowledge representation and organization systems for global use. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56(9), 903–912. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20184 Beghtol, C. (2008). Professional values and ethics in knowledge organization and cataloging. Journal of Information Ethics, 17(1), 12–19. https://doi.org/10.3172/jie.17.1.12 Berman, S. (1971). Prejudices and antipathies: a tract on the LC subject heads concerning people. Scarecrow Press. Berman, S. (2008a). “Controversial” cataloging. In Not in my library!: “Berman’s Bag” columns from the unabashed librarians, 2000-2013 (pp. 117–120). McFarland & Company, Inc. Berman, S. (2008b). Introduction: Cataloging reform, LC, and me. In K. R. Roberto (Ed.), Radical cataloging: essays at the front (pp. 5–12). McFarland & Co. Berman, S. (2008c). One book, many missed opportunities, or why cataloging matters (when it’s done right). In Not in my library!: “Berman’s Bag” columns from the unabashed librarians, 2000-2013 (pp. 127–130). McFarland & Company, Inc. Billey, A., Drabinski, E., & Roberto, K. R. (2014). What’s gender got to do with it? A critique of RDA 9.7. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 52(4), 412–421. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2014.882465 Brown, B. B. (1968). Delphi process: A methodology used for the elicitation of opinions of experts. Rand Corp. Brubaker, J. (2002). Ambiguous authorship and uncertain authenticity: A cataloger’s dilemma. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 34(4), 19–30. https://doi.org/10.1300/j104v34n04_04 Brubaker, J. (2018). Text, lies and cataloging: Ethical treatment of deceptive works in the library. McFarland & Company, Inc. Buchanan, E. A., & Henderson, K. A. (2009). Case studies in library and information science ethics. McFarland & Co. Bullard, J., Watson, B., & Purdome, C. (2022). Misrepresentation in the Surrogate: Author Critiques of “Indians of North America” Subject Headings. Cataloging and Classification Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2022.2090039 Canncasciato, D. (2011). Ethical considerations in classification practice: A case study using Creationism and Intelligent Design. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 49(5), 408–427. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2011.589221 Cataloging Ethics Steering Committee. (2019a). Cataloging ethics definition. https://sites.google.com/view/cataloging-ethics/home/cataloging-ethics-definition Cataloging Ethics Steering Committee. (2019b). Mission statement final. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1LDwDu0xHUtyYTY1B_Rilhsu6SKN1LvRNmvLn09-UUno/edit Cataloging Ethics Steering Committee. (2020a). Draft cataloguing code of ethics. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1DT1K2bEkbJN4-rLfC-cT20E4ThFkDsea_d4d1YTurf8/edit Cataloging Ethics Steering Committee. (2020b). Revised draft cataloguing code of ethics. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1tnTetySv6mgCa4RfScaffykQdtViZZ8M5nwgowZboQk/edit%0A Cataloging Ethics Steering Committee. (2020c). Steering committee updates. https://sites.google.com/view/cataloging-ethics/home/updates?authuser=0 Cataloging Ethics Steering Committee. (2021). Cataloguing code of ethics. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1IBz7nXQPfr3U1P6Xiar9cLAkzoNX_P9fq7eHvzfSlZ0/edit Chan, M., Daniels, J., Furger, S., Rasmussen, D., Shoemaker, E., & Snow, K. (2022). The development and future of the Cataloguing Code of Ethics. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 60(8), 786–806. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2022.2134247 Chan, M. L., & Salaba, A. (2016). Cataloging and classification: An introduction (4th ed.). Rowman & Littlefield. Cohen, A. (2019). Free to be... only he or she: Overcoming obstacles to accurately recording gender identity in a highly-gendered language. In J. Sandberg (Ed.), Ethical questions in name authority control (pp. 133–153). Library Juice Press. “Controversies in the LCSH: the Case of Illegal Aliens.” (2021, April 23). Controversies in the Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): the case of illegal aliens. https://www.librarianshipstudies.com/2020/04/controversies-in-library-of-congress.html Coyle, K. (2007, September 29). Name authority control, aka name identification. http://kcoyle.blogspot.com/2007/09/name-authority-control-aka-name.html Cristan, A. L., & Frank, P. (2015, July 23). Conversations About RDA: Undifferentiated Personal Name Authorities [Video]. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qYCMZOIeS8s Dalkey, N. (1969). The Delphi method: An experimental study of group opinion. Rand Corp. Dalkey, N., & Helmer, O. (1963). An experimental application of the Delphi method to the use of experts. Management Science, 9(3), 458–467. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.9.3.458 Delbecq, A. L., Van de Ven, A. H., & Gustafson, D. H. (1975). Group techniques for program planning: A guide to nominal group and Delphi processes. Scott, Foresman. Deng, S., & Davidian, C. (2021). Embracing equity, diversity and inclusion (EDI) in library cataloging. Technical Services Quarterly, 38(3), 315–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/07317131.2021.1934315 Diao, J., & Cao, H. (2016). Chronology in cataloging Chinese archaeological reports: An investigation of cultural bias in the Library of Congress Classification. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 54(4), 244–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2016.1150931 Dobreski, B. (2020, May 13). Anglo-American library cataloging. IEKO - ISKO Encyclopedia of Knowledge Organization. https://www.isko.org/cyclo/cataloging Ferris, A. M. (2008). The ethics and integrity of cataloging. Journal of Library Administration, 47(3–4), 173–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/01930820802186514 Fox, M. J., & Reece, A. (2012). Which ethics? Whose morality?: An analysis of ethical standards for information organization. Knowledge Organization, 39(5), 377–383. https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2012-5-377 Furner, J. (2007). Dewey deracialized: A critical race-theoretic perspective. Knowledge Organization, 34(3), 144–168. https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2007-3-144 Goldstein, C. H. (1995). Ethics in technical services. Louisiana Library Association (LLA) Bulletin, 58, 34–38. Guimarães, J. A. C. (2017). Slanted knowledge organization as a new ethical perspective. In J. Anderson & L. Skouvig (Eds.), The organization of knowledge: Caught between global structures and local meaning (pp. 87–102). Emerald Publishing Limited. Haider, S. (2016, February 16). Undifferentiated Personal Names in RDA Cataloging. https://resourcedescriptionandaccess.blogspot.com/2014/02/undifferentiated-personal-names-in-rda.html Hasson, F., Keeney, S., & McKenna, H. (2000). Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 32(4), 1008–1015. Hauptman, R. (2002). Ethics and librarianship. McFarland & Company, Inc. Helmer, O. (1967). Analysis of the future: The Delphi method. Rand Corp. Higgins, C. (2012). Library of Congress Classification: Teddy Roosevelt’s world in numbers? Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 50(4), 249–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2012.658989 Hoffman, G. L. (2009). Meeting users’ needs in cataloging: What is the right thing to do? Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 47(7), 631–641. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639370903111999 Hostage, J. (2019). Updating place names in the name authority file to reflect political realities: The cases of Crimea, Taiwan, and Myanmar. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 57(6), 407–422. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2019.1658676 Hsu, C.-C., & Sandford, B. A. (2007). The Delphi technique: making sense of consensus. Pratical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 12(10), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.7275/pdz9-th90 Hsu, C.-C., & Sandford, B. A. (2012). Delphi Technique. In N. J. Salkind (Ed.), Encyclopedia of research design. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412961288.n107 International Federation of Library Association & Institution. (2009). Statement of international cataloguing principles. https://www.ifla.org/best-practice-for-national-bibliographic-agencies-in-a-digital-age/node/8913 International Federation of Library Association & Institution. (2012). IFLA code of ethics for librarians and other information workers. https://www.ifla.org/publications/node/11092 International Federation of Library Association & Institution. (2016). Statement of international cataloguing principles (2016 edition). https://www.ifla.org/files/assets/cataloguing/icp/icp_2016-en.pdf Intner, S. S. (1993). Ethics in cataloging. Technicalities, 13(11), 5–8. Joudrey, D. N., & Taylor, A. G. (2018). The organization of information (4th ed.). Libraries Unlimited. Joudrey, D. N., Taylor, A. G., & Miller, D. P. (2015). Introduction to cataloging and classification (11th ed.). Libraries Unlimited. Lacey, E. (2018). Aliens in the library: The classification of migration. Knowledge Organization, 45(5), 358–379. https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2018-5-358 Lee, W.-C. (2015). Culture and classification: An introduction to thinking about ethical issues of adopting global classification standards to local environments. Knowledge Organization, 42(5), 302–307. https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2015-5-302 Lee, W.-C. (2016a). An exploratory study of the subject ontogeny of eugenics in the New Classification Scheme for Chinese Libraries and the Nippon Decimal Classification. Knowledge Organization, 43(8), 594–608. https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2016-8-594 Lee, W.-C. (2016b). Challenges and considerations of adapting foreign classification standards. Proceedings of the Fourteenth International ISKO Conference, 485–492. Lember, H., Lipkin, S., & Lee, R. J. (2013). Radical cataloging: from words to action. Urban Library Journal, 19(1). https://academicworks.cuny.edu/ulj/vol19/iss1/7/ Linstone, H. A., & Turoff, M. (1975). The Delphi method: Techniques and applicaitons. Addison-Wesley Pub. Co. Lund, B. D. (2020). Review of the Delphi method in library and information science research. Journal of Documentation, 76(4), 929–960. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-09-2019-0178 Mai, J.-E. (2010). Classification in a social world: Bias and trust. Journal of Documentation, 66(5), 627–642. https://doi.org/10.1108/00220411011066763 Mai, J.-E. (2013). Ethics, values and morality in contemporary library classifications. Knowledge Organization, 40(4), 242–253. https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2013-4-242 Martin, J. M. (2019). When public identity meets personal privacy: Ethical considerations for the use of dates of birth in name authority records for living persons. In J. Sandberg (Ed.), Ethical questions in name authority control (pp. 25–41). Library Juice Press. Martin, J. M. (2021). Records, Responsibility, and Power: An Overview of Cataloging Ethics. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 59(2–3), 281–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2020.1871458 Mason, R. O. (1986). Four ethical issues of the information age. MIS Quarterly, 10(1), 5–12. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315259697-8 McMenemy, D., Poulter, A., & Burton, P. F. (2007). A handbook of ethical practice: A practical guide to dealing with ethical issues on information and library work. Chandos Publishing. Murry, J. W., & Hammons, J. O. (1995). Delphi: A versatile methodology for conducting qualitative research. The Review of Higher Education, 18(4), 423–436. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.1995.0008 OCLC Webjunction. (2014). Competency index for the library field. https://www.webjunction.org/documents/webjunction/Competency_Index_for_the_Library_Field.html Olson, H. A. (2000). Difference, culture and change: the untapped potential of LCSH. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 29(1–2), 53–71. https://doi.org/10.1300/J104v29n01_04 Olson, H. A. (2001a). Patriarchal structures of subject access and subversive techniques for change. Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science, 26(2–3), 1–29. Olson, H. A. (2001b). The power to name: Representation in library catalogs. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 26(3), 639–668. www.jstor.org/stable/3175535 Olson, H. A. (2002). The power to name: Locating the limits of subject representation in libraries. Kluwer Academic Publishers. Olson, H. A. (2009). Introduction to the special issue on the ethics of information organization. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 47(7), 609–611. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639370903113466 Olson, H. A., & Schlegl, R. (2001). Standardization, objectivity, and user focus: A meta-analysis of subject access critiques. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 32(2), 61–80. O’Neil, P. M. (1995). Ethics. In J. K. Roth (Ed.), International encyclopedia of ethics (pp. 281–282). Fitzroy Dearborn. Patterson, R. (2022). Applying ethics in evolving librarianship: Intersectionality implications in ethical decision making. Atla Summary of Proceedings, 129–136. https://doi.org/10.31046/proceedings.2022.3163 Perera, T. (2022). Critical cataloging: Addressing bias in description and finding solutions. Atla Summary of Proceedings, 154–163. https://doi.org/10.31046/proceedings.2022.3131 Preer, J. (2008). Library ethics. Libraries Unlimited. Puig, A., & Adams, C. M. (2018). Delphi technique. In B. B. Frey (Ed.), The SAGE encyclopedia of educational research, measurement, and evaluation. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506326139.n190 Redigolo, F. M., Lopes Fujita, M. S., & Gil-Leiva, I. (2022). Guidelines for subject analysis in subject cataloging. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 60(5), 424–443. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2022.2093300 Ridi, R. (2013). Ethical values for knowledge organization. Knowledge Organization, 40(3), 187–196. https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2013-3-187 Sandberg, J. (Ed.). (2019a). Ethical questions in name authority control. Library Juice Press. Sandberg, J. (2019b). Introduction. In J. Sandberg (Ed.), Ethical questions in name authority control (pp. 1–5). Library Juice Press. Shiraishi, N. (2019). Accuracy of identity information and name authority records. In J. Sandberg (Ed.), Ethical questions in name authority control (pp. 181–193). Library Juice Press. Shoemaker, E. (2015). No one can whistle a symphony: Seeking a catalogers’ code of ethics. Knowledge Organization, 42(5), 353–364. https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2015-5-353 Singer, P. (2020). Ethics (philosophy). In Encyclopædia britannica. https://www.britannica.com/topic/ethics-philosophy Smiraglia, R. P. (2009). Bibliocentrism, cultural warrant, and the ethics of resource description: A case study. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 47(7), 671–686. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639370903112013 Smith, M. M. (1996). Information ethics: An hermeneutical analysis of an emerging area in applied ethics (Doctoral dissertation). Digital Dissertation Consortium. (9631983). Snow, K. (2015). An examination of the practical and ethical issues surrounding false memoirs in cataloging practice. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 53(8), 927–947. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2015.1056571 Snow, K. (2017). Defining, assessing, and rethinking quality cataloging. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 55(7–8), 438–455. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2017.1350774 Snow, K., & Dunbar, A. W. (2022). Advancing the Relationship between Critical Cataloging and Critical Race Theory. Cataloging and Classification Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2022.2089936 Snow, K., & Shoemaker, B. (2020). Defining cataloging ethics: Practitioner perspectives. Cataloging and Classification Quarterly, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2020.1795767 Sorley, W. R., & Sidgwick, H. (1925). Ethics. In J. M. Baldwin (Ed.), Dictionary of philosophy and psychology (pp. 346–347). Macmillan. Sung, M. G. (2013, June 26). Ten essential qualities for success: A new cataloging librarian’s guide from a supervisor’s perspective. Public Libraries Online. Watson, B. M. (2021). Advancing equitable cataloging. Proceedings from North American Symposium on Knowledge Organization, 8. | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/88185 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 編目倫理（cataloging ethics）是編目工作者進行決策時，提供參考的一套原則與價值觀。鑒於編目工作對於讀者取用資源與圖書館目錄品質的影響力，編目人員除了具備知識與技能外，也應有良好的倫理素養，以確保能進行適當的編目決策。近年來，國外學界與圖書館界開始萌生對於編目倫理的興趣，然而仍缺乏從編目館員與學者角度切入的研究。因此本研究採修正式疊慧法（Delphi method）取徑，透過文獻回顧歸納出數項價值，並請16位具3年以上編目資歷的編目人員依據重要性進行判斷。另一方面，本研究以開放式問卷向編目人員蒐集實務上遭逢倫理難題的經驗以及尋求協助的管道。最終經二回合問卷，歸納出14項編目工作時應該注重的倫理價值，這些價值涉及著錄工作、館員知能與讀者等多元面向。此外透過實務上的經驗回饋，印證倫理難題具多樣性以及發生時機的不確定性，並且當館員面對倫理問題時，會以參考資源與同道作為主要諮詢管道。透過本研究不僅能了解我國編目人員對編目倫理認知的現況，研究結果也可供未來規劃編目教育之參考。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Cataloging ethics is a set of principles and values that provide guidance to cataloging professionals when making decisions. Given the influence of cataloging work on access to resource and the quality of library catalogs, catalogers should possess not only knowledge and skills but strong foundation of ethics to ensure appropriate cataloging decisions. Recently, there has been growing interest in cataloging ethics in the international academic and library communities. However, there still lacks research from the perspectives of cataloging librarians and scholars.
Therefore, the study uses modified Delphi method, which includes a literature review to identify several values and invites 16 catalogers with at least 3 years of cataloging experience to evaluate the importance. Besides, an open-ended questionnaire is used to collect practical experiences when facing ethical challenges and their sources of consultation. Through 2 rounds of questionnaires, 14 ethical values are identified to be emphasize when cataloging, which involve various aspects such as bibliographic work, librarians' competencies, and readers. Furthermore, the feedback from practical experiences confirms the diversity and uncertainty of ethical dilemmas, and reveals that catalogers primarily consult reference materials and peers when facing ethical issues. This research not only provides insights into the current understanding of cataloging ethics among catalogers in our country but also serves as a reference for future planning of cataloging education based on the research findings. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2023-08-08T16:41:05Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2023-08-08T16:41:05Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 謝誌 i
摘要 iii Abstract v 章節目次 vii 圖目次 ix 表目次 ix 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景 1 第二節 研究動機、目的與研究問題 4 第三節 研究範圍與限制 5 第四節 名詞解釋 6 第二章 文獻回顧 9 第一節 資訊倫理與圖書館專業倫理 9 一、 倫理與道德決策 9 二、 資訊倫理 12 三、 圖書館專業倫理與技術服務倫理 13 第二節 編目工作中應遵守的專業價值與「編目倫理」 15 一、 編目專業價值 16 二、 批判性編目（critical cataloging） 23 三、 編目倫理 25 四、 〈編目倫理規範〉 30 第三節 編目實務涉及的編目倫理議題 34 一、 記述編目相關議題 34 二、 主題編目相關議題：分類架構與體系 36 三、 主題編目相關議題：標題表與命名 38 四、 權威控制相關議題 40 五、 編目規則通用化與編目實務在地化議題 43 第三章 研究方法 45 第一節 研究概念與研究架構 45 第二節 疊慧法簡介 46 一、 疊慧法的定義與發展 46 二、 疊慧法的原理、特性與優缺點 48 三、 疊慧法的信效度 50 四、 基本實施步驟 51 第三節 研究對象 55 第四節 研究工具 62 第五節 資料分析 64 第四章 研究結果與討論 67 第一節 第一回合疊慧法問卷統計結果分析 67 一、 記述編目 68 二、 主題分析 72 三、 權威控制 75 第二節 第二回合疊慧法問卷統計結果分析 79 一、 記述編目 79 二、 主題分析 82 三、 權威控制 86 第三節 開放式題型結果分析 89 一、 編目實務容易遭遇難題的情境 90 二、 編目人員尋求解決建議的管道 96 三、 編目倫理的定義 96 第四節 綜合討論 97 第五章 結論與建議 109 第一節 研究結論 109 第二節 研究貢獻與未來應用 112 第三節 未來研究建議 114 附錄一 〈編目倫理規範〉原文 117 附錄二 107與108學年度大專校院圖書館館藏量排序 121 附錄三 「我國編目館員對編目倫理認知之研究」第一回合疊慧法問卷 122 附錄四 「我國編目館員對編目倫理認知之研究」第二回合疊慧法問卷 130 參考書目 137 中文文獻 137 英文文獻 140 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.title | 我國編目館員對編目倫理認知之研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | A Study on Cataloging Librarians' Perceptions of Cataloging Ethics | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 111-2 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 王梅玲;張郁蔚 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Mei-Ling Wang;Yu-Wei Chang | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 編目倫理,資訊組織倫理,疊慧法,德菲法, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | cataloging ethics,the ethics of cataloging,Delphi method,Delphi techniques, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 146 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202301627 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2023-07-17 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 文學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 圖書資訊學系 | - |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2025-03-25 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 圖書資訊學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-111-2.pdf | 2.3 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。