請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/8812
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 陳思賢 | |
dc.contributor.author | Wei-Chung Wu | en |
dc.contributor.author | 吳維中 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-20T20:01:49Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2009-10-16 | |
dc.date.available | 2021-05-20T20:01:49Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2009-10-16 | |
dc.date.issued | 2009 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2009-10-13 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 壹、海德格的著作
德文原典 Wegmarken.1976. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann GmbH. Holzweg. 1977. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann GmbH. Sein und Zeit. 1977. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann GmbH. Erläuterungen zu Hölderlins Dichtung. 1981. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann GmbH. Einführung in die Metaphysik. 1983. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann GmbH. Die Grundbegriffe der Metaphysik: Welt, Endlichkeit, Einsamkeit. 1992. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann GmbH. Ontologie: Hermeneutik der Faktizität. 1995. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann GmbH. Phänomenologie des religiösen Lebens. 1995. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann GmbH. Reden und andere Zeugnisse eines Lebensweges 1910-1976. 2000. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann GmbH. Vorträge und Aufsätze. 2000. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann GmbH. Zur Sache des Denkens. 2007. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann GmbH. 英文譯本 Being and Time. 1962. Trans. John Macquarrie and Edward Robinson. New York: Harper & Row. Poetry, Language, Thought. 1971. Trans. Albert Hofstadter. New York: Harper & Row. On Time and Being. 1972. Trans. Joan Stambaugh. New York: Harper & Row. The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays. 1977. Trans. William Lovitt. New York: Harper & Row. Phenomenological Interpretations with Respect to Aristotle: Indication of the Hermeneutical Situation. 1992. Trans. Michael Bauer. In Man and World 25: 355-393. The Fundamental Concepts of Metaphysics: world, finitude, solitude. 1995. Trans. William McNeill and Nicholas Walker. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press. Hölderlin’s Hymn “The Ister”. 1996. Trans. William McNeill and Julia Davis. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press. Pathmark. 1998. Ed. William Mcneill. London and New York: Cambridge University Press. Ontology-The Hermeneutics of Facticity. 1999. Trans. John van Buren. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press. Introduction to Metaphysics. 2000a. Trans. Gregory Fried and Robert Polt. New Haven and London: Yale University Press. Elucidation of Hölderlin’s poetry. 2000b. Trans. Keith Hoeller. New York: Humanity Books, and imprint of Prometheus Books. Off the Beaten Track. 2002. Trans. Julian Young and Kenneth Haynes. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press. Martin Heidegger: philosophical and political writings. 2003. Ed. Manfred Stassen. London and New York: The Continuum International Publishing Group. The Phenomenology of Religious Life. 2004. Trans, Matthias Fritsch and Jennifer Anna Gosetti-Ferencei. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press. 中文譯本 《海德格爾選集》,1996,孫周興編選,上海:三聯書店。 《荷爾德林詩的闡釋》,2000,孫周興譯,北京:商務印書館。 《路標》,2000,孫周興譯,北京:商務印書館。 《形上學導論》,2005,熊偉譯,北京:商務印書館。 《演講論文集》,2005,孫周興譯,北京:三聯書店。 《存在與時間》,2006,陳嘉映、王慶節合譯,北京:三聯書店。 《林中路》,2008,孫周興譯,上海:上海譯文出版社。 《思的經驗(1910-1976)》,2008,陳春文譯,北京:人民出版社。 《時間概念史導論》,2009,歐東明譯,北京:商務印書館。 《存在論:實際性的解釋學》,2009,何衛平譯,北京:人民出版社。 貳、其他著作 英文 一、專書 Blitz, Mark. 1981 Heidegger’s Being and Time and the Possibility of Political Philosophy. London: Cornell University Press. Caputo, John. 1982. Heidegger and Aquinas. New York: Fordham University Press. Sophocles. 1987. Antigone. Trans. Andrew Brown. Warminster, Wiltshire, England : Aris & Phillips. Habermas, Jürgen. 1989. The New Conservatism: cultural criticism and the historians' debate. Trans. and ed. Shierry Weber Nicholsen. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. Pöggeler, Otto. 1990. Martin Heidegger’s Path of Thinking. Trans. Daniel Magurshak and Sigmund Barber. Atlantic Highlands, NJ : Humanities Press International. Zimmerman, Michael E. 1990. Heidegger’s Confrontation with Modernity. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press. Gadamer, Hans-Georg. 1994. Heidegger’s Ways. Trans. John Stanley. Albany: State University of New York Press. Löwith, Karl. 1995. Martin Heidegger and European Nihilism. Trans. Gary Steiner. Ed. Richard Wolin. New York: Columbia University Press. de Beistegui, Miguel. 1998. Heidegger & the Political. London and New York: Routledge. Pöggeler, Otto. 1998. The Paths of Heidegger’s Life and Thought. Trans. John Bailiff. New York: Humanity Books, and imprint of Prometheus Books. Polt, Richard. 1999. Heidegger: An Introduction. London: UCL Press. Safranski, Rüdiger. 2002. Martin Heidegger- Between Good and Evil. Trans. Ewald Osers. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. Bambach, Charles. 2003. Heidegger’s Roots: Nietzsche, National Socailism, and the Greeks. New York: Cornell University Press. de Beistegui, Miguel. 2003. Thinking with Heidegger. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. 二、專書論文 Sheehan, Thomas. 1981. Heidegger’s Early Years: fragments for a philosophical biography. In Heidegger: the man and the thinker, ed. Thomas Sheehan. Chicago: Precedent Publishing. Arendt, Hannah. 1990. “For Martin Heidegger’s Eightieth Birthday.” In Martin Heidegger and National Socialism : Questions and Answers, ed. Günther Neske and Emil Kettering. Trans. Lisa Harries. New York: Paragon House. Derrida, Jacques. 1990. “Heidegger’s Silence.” In Martin Heidegger and National Socialism : Questions and Answers, ed. Günther Neske and Emil Kettering. Trans. Lisa Harries. New York: Paragon House. Kettering, Eiml. 1990. “Heidegger and Politics: Stage of a Discussion.” In Martin Heidegger and National Socialism : Questions and Answers, ed. Günther Neske and Emil Kettering. Trans. Lisa Harries. New York: Paragon House. Habermas, Jürgen. 1992. “Life Forms, Morality and the Task of the Philosopher.” In Autonomy and Solidarity, ed. Peter Dews. London; New York: Verso. Habermas, Jürgen. 1993. “On the Publication of the Lecture of 1935.” In The Heidegger Controversy, ed. Richard Wolin. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. Jasper, Karl. 1993. “Letter to the Freiburg University Denazification Committee.” In The Heidegger Controversy, ed. Richard Wolin. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. Löwith, Karl. 1993. “My Last Meeting with Heidegger.” In The Heidegger Controversy, ed. Richard Wolin. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. Pöggeler, Otto. 1993. “Heidegger’s Political Self-Understanding,” In The Heidegger Controversy, ed. Richard Wolin. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. Wolin, Richard. 1993. Introduction to Habermas’s “On the Publication of the Lecture of 1935.” In The Heidegger Controversy, ed. Richard Wolin. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. Risser, James. 1999. Introduction to Heidegger toward the Turn, ed. James Risser. New York: State University of New York Press. McNeill, William. 2001. The Time of Contributions to Philosophy. In Companion to Heidegger’s Contributions to Philosophy, ed. Charles E. Scott, Schoenbohm, etc. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Ingram, David. 2002. Introduction. In The Political. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers. Guignon, Charles. 2005. “The History of Being.” In A Companion to Heidegger, ed. Hubert Dreyfus and Mark Wrathall. Malden: Blackwell Publishing. 中文 一、專書 孫周興,1994,《說不可說之神秘》,上海:三聯書店。 Sophocles著,呂健忠譯,1998,《安蒂岡妮-墓窖裡的女人》,台北:書林。 關永中,2000,《知識論(二)-近世思潮》,台北:五南。 Held, Klaus著,倪梁康等譯,2003,《世界現象學》,北京:三聯書店。 Aristotle著,廖申白譯注,2003,《尼各馬可倫理學》,北京:商務印書館。 項退結,2006,《海德格》,台北:東大。 陳榮華,2006,《海德格存有與時間闡釋》,台北:台大出版中心。 二、期刊論文 張鼎國,1997,〈海德格、高達美與希臘人〉,《哲學雜誌》,21:98-125。 吳俊業,2004,〈在多元差異中開展的公共性-黑爾德的政治現象綜述〉,《當代》,206:22-31。 Held, Klaus著,羅麗君、吳俊業譯,2004,〈本真生存與政治世界〉,《當代》,206: 32-47。 蔡慶樺,2006,〈海德格的決斷論〉,文化研究月報:http://www.cc.ncu.edu.tw/~csa/journal/61/journal_park461.htm 三、會議論文 張鼎國,2008,〈『誰是我們?』/『我們是誰?』─1930 年代海德格一個「政治」問題的探討〉,「第四屆哲學南北論壇」論文(2008年11月),上海:上海復旦大學哲學學院。 張鼎國,2008,〈佇立時間邊緣的希臘神殿:從海德格《藝術作品起源》回探《存有與時間》的詮釋學出路〉,「海德格《存有與時間》出版80 週年紀念學術研討會」論文(2006年5月),香港:香港中文大學哲學系。 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/8812 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 身為二十世紀最具影響力的哲學家,海德格不僅因為他對「存有問題」所做的努力或為人所景仰,或是啟迪後進者,在不同領域中有所開疆闢土,成果豐碩斐然;同時也因為他在1930年代的一段政治經歷之中有所迷途,爾後雖能識途而返,卻始終拒絕公開承認錯誤因而飽受批評。哲學、政治學與社會學各界對此「海德格事件」之解讀、詮釋與評價,莫不有立場互異的激烈辯論。在對此一背景之前理解下,本文的研究旨趣在於回到海德格的思想本身,並試圖以此思想遺產為出發點,對此事件的本源核心-「政治問題」-有所回應。本此主軸,本文並不關心海德格的政治立場與政治主張,而是試著在他的哲學工作,也就是對存有真理有所長考的道路中,找出海德格得以思考「政治問題」的基礎,並且初步地勾勒出在海氏眼中,該問題之所關切與之所切進的目標與進路。
準此,本論文分為兩大部分。第一部份以三個章節分別回答下列問題:「存有問題」首先是如何進入海德格的視域,而此一問題何以能與提問者之切身存有具有關連?自《存有與時間》到1930年代初期的這段時間中,海德格如何將存有問題以「我們是誰?」表述為政治問題?以第四章為主體的第二部分則代表筆者個人的一種嘗試,即順著「我們是誰?」的提問勾勒出海德格不曾遠離,反倒更有所深思的「政治」為何。最後則指出,海德格追本溯源、縱身躍入而有所開鑿與詮釋的polis,適足以統整他在存有、政治與「我們」不同向度與主題之間所做的推敲,並且給予我們在諸神退隱、技術耗盡大地之際,能不斷拾起如何在世間安身立命此一根本問題的一種可能。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | As one of the most influential philosophers in 20th century, Heidegger is not only acclaimed for his tremendous effort and achievement on contemplating the question of Being(Seinsfrage), which also inspired other great minds in different intellectual domains; he also suffered some of the most severe critiques for his once “lost” in political actions and practices. Although he could return to his own course with a detached and critical attitude, he was still blamed for not willing to admit his own “fault” directly and publicly. Scholars of philosophy, politics and sociology pose different standpoints, interpretations, and judgments toward the so-called “Heidegger’s Case.” Under such background which forms a pre-understanding, this thesis attempts to return to Heidegger’s thinking legacy as such, takes it as the point of departure, and responds to the core problem of the case-the problem of the political. Based on such studying interest, instead of his political stance and assertions, we concentrate on Heidegger’s philosophical efforts-thinking the question of Being-try to find the foundation for his thinking on the political, locate both the end and the way of his thinking on such question.
As a result, the thesis is divided into two major parts. The first part answers the following questions with three chapters: How did the question of Being come into Heidegger’s horizon? How and why such question is connected with the question-raiser’s Being-transitive? During the period between 1927’s magnum opus, Being and Time and the early 1930s, how did Heidegger put a philosophical question which asks “Who we are” as a political question? The second part which includes the fourth chapter represents my own attempt. Following the question “Who we are,” I try to sketch out the contour of the political which Heidegger never put aside but contemplate far more than ever known. Finally, I would like to show that, by way of retrieving its origin and making a leap (Ur-sprung) for it, Heidegger’s interpretation and excavation of polis unified his deliberations between Being, the political and “We.” This also provides us a possibility which enable us to take up the question of how to settle ourselves in the world during the age of the flight of Gods and the exhaustion of the earth, anew and constantly. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-20T20:01:49Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-98-R95322027-1.pdf: 726137 bytes, checksum: 13862974eb1adf607230a988b5eac085 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2009 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 謝辭 i
摘要 iii Abstract v 緒論 1 第一章 海德格前期對「存有問題」的探索 11 第一節 早期的嘗試 11 第二節 事實生命作為哲學研究的基礎 17 第三節 存有學 24 第二章 《存有與時間》中的存有問題:此有及其命運 29 第一節 存有與此有 29 第二節 此有是誰? 33 第三節 歷史、命運與共同命運 40 第三章 「我們是誰?」 49 第一節 空無、形上學與學術 51 第二節 哲學、基本情緒、處境與「我們是誰?」 57 第三節 從德國大學的「自我主張」來看「我們是誰?」 62 第四章 「我們是誰?」作為「政治」思考的指引 71 第一節 「我們」與存有問題 74 第二節 存有發生的場所:polis 82 第三節 從希臘神廟回視作為「政治」本源的polis 95 結論 一種可能的「存有政治」 109 參考文獻 113 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 由「我們是誰?」到「政治」的本源:海德格對存有政治的思考 | zh_TW |
dc.title | From “Who we are?” to the Origin of the Political: Heidegger’s Thinking on the Politics of Being | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 98-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 張鼎國,吳俊業 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 海德格,存有,存有問題,「我們是誰?」,民族,polis,「政治」, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Heidegger,Being,The Question of Being, | en |
dc.relation.page | 119 | |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
dc.date.accepted | 2009-10-14 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 政治學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 政治學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-98-1.pdf | 709.12 kB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。