Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/88010Full metadata record
| ???org.dspace.app.webui.jsptag.ItemTag.dcfield??? | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 王泰俐 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Tai-Li Wang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 戴淨妍 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Jing-Yan Dai | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-08-01T16:23:04Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2023-11-09 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2023-08-01 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2023 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2023-07-05 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Hong, G.（2019）。媒體的藍綠差異，政治農場與社論媒體。Medium。bit.ly/3bYQ714
Kahl, C., & Wright, T.（2022）。疫後震盪效應：防疫政治學與世界秩序的崩潰（林添貴譯）。燎原。（原著出版於2021年）。 方怡文、周慶祥（2002）。新聞採訪理論與實務（第二版）。正中。 王石番（1991）。傳播內容分析法：理論與實證。幼獅出版社。 王淑美（2018）。網路速度與新聞轉變中的記者時間實踐及價值反思。中華傳播學刊，33，65-98。 付李琦（2019）。國防部例行記者會問答策略研究〔未出版之碩士論文〕。華中師範大學語言學及應用語言學系。 行政院新聞傳播處（2022年4月7日）。蘇揆：「新臺灣模式」下「重症求清零、有效管控輕症」。https://www.ey.gov.tw/Page/9277F759E41CCD91/1a2b306f-7786-413e-863e-3d5558037b03 何欣潔、李易安、林庭葦（2021年5月17日）。從252天零確診到單日333例本土確診，臺灣防疫的三個挑戰。端傳媒。https://theinitium.com/article/20210517-taiwan-covid-epidemic-community-infection/ 吳文欽（2020）。疫情訊息透明度與防疫政策成效評估。COVOD-19的人文社會省思。https://covid19.ascdc.tw/essay/180 吳宜蓁（2003年11月29-30日）。SARS風暴危機溝通與現階段宣導策略檢視：臺灣的例子，兩岸SARS危機管理：經驗、教訓與比較研討會，台北市，臺灣。 吳柏緯（2020年5月9日）。順時中註冊商標 智慧局：流行語屬於社會共有。中央社。https://www.cna.com.tw/news/firstnews/202005090114.aspx 呂文慧（2020）。為什麼天天想追「疫情指揮中心記者會」？。天下獨立評論。https://opinion.cw.com.tw/blog/profile/423/article/9194 邱宜儀、蘇蘅（2009）。政治名人與媒體：馬英九報導的新聞框架初探。新聞學研究，99，1-45。 孫秀蕙（2009）。公共關係：理論、策略與研究實例（新修訂第二版）。正中書局。 徐建峰（2022年7月18日）。尷尬！王必勝新官上任第一天 被追問「太太諒解了嗎？」拒答變臉閃人。上報。https://www.upmedia.mg/news_info.php?Type=24&SerialNo=149531 徐美苓（2023）。臺灣能源轉型爭議論述的媒體建構：減碳、非核家園與空污防制的風險傳播多重難。新聞學研究，154，1-54。 涂孜意（2020年5月8日）。防疫記者會模式操作 威肯公關分析「兩大關鍵」。銘報。https://mol.mcu.edu.tw/%E9%98%B2%E7%96%AB%E8%A8%98%E8%80%85%E6%9C%83%E6%A8%A1%E5%BC%8F%E6%93%8D%E4%BD%9C-%E5%A8%81%E8%82%AF%E5%85%AC%E9%97%9C%E5%88%86%E6%9E%90%E3%80%8C%E5%85%A9%E5%A4%A7%E9%97%9C%E9%8D%B5%E3%80%8D/ 疾病管制署（2013）。SARS10年 生聚與教訓。衛生福利部。https://www.cdc.gov.tw/File/Get/yIBLAK91LqROTk-5P_WoWA 疾病管制署（2020年3月8日）。指揮中心通風消毒 記者保持距離、勿近身堵麥。衛生福利部。https://www.cdc.gov.tw/Bulletin/Detail/p_S4-CFHlTXW4gMSm19ezA?typeid=9 疾病管制署（2020年5月14日）。防疫成功因素 資訊公開透明。衛生福利部。https://covid19.mohw.gov.tw/ch/cp-4826-53649-205.html 國家通訊傳播委員會（2020）。108年3月電視新聞報導觀測報告。國家通訊傳播委員會。https://www.ncc.gov.tw/chinese/files/19061/8_41565_190619_1.pdf 張如嫻（2021）。金魚缸裡的隱形風暴：疫情直播記者會下，新聞工作的挑戰與突圍 〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立臺灣大學新聞研究所。 曹艷（2010）。白宮記者提問技巧分析以奧巴馬記者招待會為例。新聞與寫作，1，36–38。 梁美珊、莊迪澎（2013）。圖解傳播理論。五南。 許瓊文（2019）。2019臺灣新聞媒體可信度研究。財團法人臺灣媒體觀察教育基金會。https://www.mediawatch.org.tw/news/9911 陳世榮（2015）。社會科學研究中的文字探勘應用：以文意為基礎的文件分類及其問題。人文及社會科學集刊，27(4)，683-718。 陳偉周（2021年8月19日）。打完疫苗吸湯匙、陳時中換髮型…從疫情記者會「綜藝化提問」看：媒體自我閹割的悲哀。今周刊。https://www.businesstoday.com.tw/article/category/80392/post/202108190035/ 陳婕翎、沈佩瑤（2023年4月27日）。陳時中現身指揮中心終場記者會 感嘆疫情間不免很多遺憾。中央社。https://www.cna.com.tw/news/ahel/202304270295.aspx 陳敬哲（2020年3月8日）。防疫？防議？ 指揮中心限制疫情記者會發問。NOW健康。https://today.line.me/tw/v2/article/k6vjZw 陳憶寧（2011）。健康傳播與公共衛生。傳播與社會學刊，17，19-30。 陸建華 （2003年11月29-30日）。非典時期的媒體活動興媒體管理一一公共危機與資訊傳播。兩岸SARS危機管理：經驗、教訓與比較研討會，台北市，臺灣。 喻靖媛、臧國仁（1995）。記者及消息來源互動關係。臧國仁（編），新聞工作者與消息來源（頁201-236）。國立政治大學新聞研究所。 曾婷瑄（2022年5月19日）。無國界記者：臺灣為民主世界典範 應改善媒體環境。中央社。https://www.cna.com.tw/news/aipl/202205190017.aspx 馮紹恩（2019）。 猜猜看：臺灣民眾最相信哪些人？最不信任哪些人？。遠見雜誌。https://www.gvm.com.tw/article/61091 楊雅棠、邱宜君、謅尚謙（2023年4月26日）。專家談防疫成績：人民高水準 政府不及格。聯合新聞網。https://udn.com/news/story/123490/7123303?utm_source=yahoonews&utm_medium=yahoo 萬小廣（2010）。王石捐款事件報導的媒介框架分析。傳播與社會學刊，12，79-110。 網路溫度計（2020a）。網路口碑人物排行榜。網路溫度計。https://web.archive.org/web/20200325020112/https:/dailyview.tw/top100/item/1228 網路溫度計（2020b）。政治人物網路口碑。網路溫度計。https://web.archive.org/web/20200428081715/https:/dailyview.tw/top100/topic/9 網路溫度計（2021a）。好牌打壞掀「逆時中」浪潮！4大縣市長槍口射中央 網路聲量創新高。華視。https://news.cts.com.tw/dailyview/politics/202106/202106022044632.html 網路溫度計（2021b）。他們全都「逆時中」。網路溫度計。https://dailyview.tw/Daily/2021/06/11 臧國仁（1995）。代序：新聞工作者與消息來源的互動。臧國仁（編），新聞工作者與消息來源（頁xii-xx）。國立政治大學新聞研究所。 臧國仁（1999）。新聞媒體與消息來源媒介框架與真實建構之論述。三民書局。 臧國仁、鍾蔚文（1994）。記者如何問問題？如何問好問題？如何問對問題，新聞「學」與「術」的對話。國立政治大學新聞研究所。 劉佳薇（2018）。臺灣民眾的媒體選擇與統獨立場 （二版）。五南。 劉品希（2020年11月16日）。公開招募疫苗受試者合法？衛福部：只是詢問意向 未來仍將個案研判。中央廣播電台。https://www.rti.org.tw/news/view/id/2084805 鄭任汶（2020）。媒體與政治：從媒體運作與立法面向的探討。翰蘆。 賴怡忠（2005）。從公民投票看臺灣主體定位。國家政策季刊，4(3)，89-108。 駱正林（2004）。記者招待會上西方記者的提問技巧。新聞愛好者，10，46-47。 戴淨妍（2021年9月8日）。致死率變化教我們的事：加強防疫韌性，檢測與醫療量能如何長期備戰。報導者。https://www.twreporter.org/a/covid-19-fatality-rate 魏玓（2020）。新冠肺炎的「新聞併發症」 媒體、政府與民眾的新三角關係，臺灣社會研究季刊，117，199-215。 羅文輝（2004）。選擇可信度：1992 及 2002 年報紙與電視新聞可信度的比較研究。新聞學研究，80，1-50。 羅文輝（2013）。報紙與電視可信度。張茂桂、羅文輝、徐火炎（編），臺灣的社會變遷1985-2005：傳播與政治行為（頁 65–91）。中央研究院。 羅文輝、林文淇、牛隆光、蔡卓芬（2003）。媒介依賴與媒介使用對選舉新聞可信度的影響：五種媒介比較。新聞學研究，74，19–44。 羅文輝、黃葳威（2000）。報紙與電視總統選舉新聞的比較研究。聯合報系文化基金會專題研究報告。 羅文輝、鍾蔚文（1992）。報紙與電視如何報導民國八十年的第二屆國代選舉。亞洲協會專題研究報告。 蘇蘅（2015）。臺灣新聞媒體公信力調查。臺灣媒體觀察教育基金會。https://www.mediawatch.org.tw/sites/default/files/files/0331%E6%96%B0%E8%81%9E%E5%AA%92%E9%AB%94%E5%8F%AF%E4%BF%A1%E5%BA%A6%E7%A0%94%E7%A9%B6%E6%88%90%E6%9E%9C%E5%A0%B1%E5%91%8A.pdf 蘋果新聞網（2020年3月21日）。【指揮所日記】政院幕僚埋伏記者群組 操作風向超即時。蘋果新聞網。https://www.appledaily.com.tw/life/20200321/PKDEMVZBQ7TW7GSUSW4AD6BTW4/ Adams, J., Merrill, S., & Grofman, B. (2005). A unified theory of party competition. Cambridge University Press. Adolph, C., Amano, K., Bang-Jensen, B., Fullman, N., & Wilkerson, J. (2021). Pandemic politics: Timing state-level social distancing responses to COVID-19. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 46(2), 211-233. Aguila Sánchez, J. C., Llano Guibarra, N. I., & Pereyra-Zamora, P. (2021). Media Agenda and Press Conferences on COVID-19 in Mexico: An Analysis of Journalists’ Questions. International journal of environmental research and public health, 18(22), 12067. Allcott, H., Boxell, L., Conway, J., Gentzkow, M., Thaler, M., & Yang, D. (2020). Polarization and public health: Partisan differences in social distancing during the coronavirus pandemic. Journal of public economics, 191, 104-254. Amsler, M. (2020). Using Lexical-Semantic Concepts for Fine-Grained Classification in the Embedding Space. Doctoral dissertation. University of Zurich, Faculty of Arts. ASNE. (1999). ASNE Journalism Credibility Project, 1999. Washington. DC: ASNE. ASNE. (American Society of Newspaper Editors) (1985). Newspaper credibility: Building reader Trust. Washington, DC: ASNE. Baekgaard, M., Christensen, J., Madsen, J. K., & Mikkelsen, K. S. (2020). Rallying around the flag in times of COVID-19: Societal lockdown and trust in democratic institutions. Journal of Behavioral Public Administration, 3(2). Baker, W. D., and J. R. Oneal. 2001. Patriotism or Opinion Leadership? The Nature and Origins of the “Rally Round the Flag” Effect. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 45(5), 661–687. Barberá, P., Boydstun, A. E., Linn, S., McMahon, R., & Nagler, J. (2021). Automated text classification of news articles: A practical guide. Political Analysis, 29(1), 19-42. Barrios, J. M., & Hochberg, Y. (2020). Risk perception through the lens of politics in the time of the COVID-19 pandemic (No. w27008). National Bureau of Economic Research. Bechtel, M. M., & Hainmueller, J. (2011). How lasting is voter gratitude? An analysis of the short‐and long‐term electoral returns to beneficial policy. American Journal of Political Science, 55(4), 852-868. Berkowitz, D., & Adams, D. B. (1990). Information subsidy and agenda building in local television news. Journalism Quarterly, 67, 723-731. Bernstein, C. (1992). The idiot culture. The New Republic, 8, 22-28. Boin, A., 't Hart, P., Stern, E., & Sundelius, B. (2005). The Politics of Crisis Management: Public Leadership Under Pressure. Cambridge University Press. Bollyky, T., & Kiernan, C. S. (2021, October 23). Fighting a pandemic requires trust. Foreign Affairs. https://www. foreignaffairs. com/articles/unitedstates/2020-10-23/coronavirus-fighting-requires-trust Bryant, J., & Miron, D. (2004, December). Theory and research in mass communication. Journal of Communication, 54(4), 662-704 Budge, I., & Farlie D. (1983). Explaining and predicting elections: Issue effects and party strategies in twenty-three democracies. Allen & Unwin. Capoccia, G. & Kelemen R. D. (2007). The study of critical junctures: Theory, narrative, and counterfactuals in historical institutionalism. World Politics, 59(3), 341-369. Cédric Févotte and Jérôme Idier. 2011. Algorithms for nonnegative matrix factorization with the β- divergence. Neural computation, 23(9), 2421-2456. Clayman, S. E., & Heritage, J. (2002). Questioning presidents: Journalistic deference and adversarialness in the press conferences of US Presidents Eisenhower and Reagan. Journal of communication, 52(4), 749-775. Dalton, R. (2019). Citizen Politics: Public Opinion and Political Parties in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Congressional Quarterly Press. De Vries, C. E., & Hobolt, S. B. (2020a). Political entrepreneurs: The rise of challenger parties in Europe. Princeton University Press. De Vries, C., & Hobolt, S. B. (2020b). The rise of challenger parties. Political Insight, 11(3), 16–19. Devlin, K., Fagan, M., & Connaughton, A. (2021, June 23). People in advanced economies say their society is more divided than before pandemic. Pew Research Center Report, 2021. https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2021/06/23/people-in-advanced-economies-say-their-society-is-more-divided-than-before-pandemic/discourse (pp. 95-117). London: Academic Press. Engle, S., Stromme, J., & Zhou, A. (2020). Staying at home: mobility effects of covid-19. Available at SSRN:. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3565703 Esther, G. (1978). Questions and Politeness. Cambridge University Press. Finset, A., Bosworth, H., Butow, P., Gulbrandsen, P., Hulsman, R. L., Pieterse, A. H., ... & van Weert, J. (2020). Effective health communication–a key factor in fighting the COVID-19 pandemic. Patient education and counseling, 103(5), 873. Franklin, B. (1997). Newszak and News Media. London: Arnold. Gandy, O. H. (1982). Beyond agenda setting: Information subsidies and public policy. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. Garrett, L. (2020). COVID-19: the medium is the message. The lancet, 395(10228), 942-943. Garrison, B. (1992). Professional news reporting. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Gaziano, C., McGrath, K. (1986). Measuring the Concept of Credibility. Journalism Quarterly, 63(3), 451-462. Grimmer, J., and B. Stewart. (2013). Text as Data: The Promise and Pitfalls of Automatic Content Analysis Methods for Political Texts. Political Analysis, 21(3), 267-297. Grootendorst, M. (2022). BERTopic: Neural topic modeling with a class-based TF-IDF procedure. arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.05794. Grossman, G., Kim, S., Rexer, J. M., & Thirumurthy, H. (2020). Political partisanship influences behavioral responses to governors’ recommendations for COVID-19 prevention in the United States. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(39), 24144-24153. Gunther, A. C. (1992). Biased press or biased public? Attitudes toward media coverage of social groups. Public Opinion Quarterly, 56, 147-167. Hamilton, W. L., K. Clark, J. Leskovec, and D. Jurafsky. 2016. Inducing Domain Specific Sentiment Lexicons from Unlabeled Corpora. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 595-605. Han, Q., Zheng, B., Cristea, M., Agostini, M., Bélanger, J. J., Gützkow, B., ... & PsyCorona Collaboration. (2021). Trust in government regarding COVID-19 and its associations with preventive health behaviour and prosocial behaviour during the pandemic: a cross-sectional and longitudinal study. Psychological medicine, 1-11. Hanusch, F. (2015). Transformative times: Australian journalists’ perceptions of changes in their work. Media International Australia,155, 38-53. Harper, C. (1998). And That's the Way It Will Be: News and Information in a Digital World (Book Review). Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 75(3), 657. Heritage, J. (1985). Analyzing news interviews: Aspects of the production of talk for an 'Overhearing' audience. Handbook of discourse analysis, vol. III: Discourse and dialogue. Heritage, J. (2002). Designing questions and setting agendas in the news interview. Studies in language and social interaction, 57-90. Hetherington, M. J., & Nelson, M. (2003). Anatomy of a rally effect: George W. Bush and the war on terrorism. PS: Political Science & Politics, 36(1), 37-42. Hille, K. (2020, June 29). Taiwan’s unity cracks under Chinese disinformation onslaught. Financial Times. https://www.ft.com/content/f22f1011-0630-462a-a21e-83bae4523da7 Idoiaga Mondragón, N. (2014). Influenza A and the Role of the Media in a Pandemic: What Social Representations Create the Media about Health Epidemics?. MEDICA REVIEW. International Medical Humanities Review / Revista Internacional De Humanidades Médicas, 3(2). Johansson, B., Hopmann, D. N., & Shehata, A. (2021). When the rally-around-the-flag effect disappears, or: when the COVID-19 pandemic becomes “normalized”. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 31(sup1), 321-334. Kernell, S. (1978). Explaining Presidential Popularity. American Political Science Review, 72, 506–522. King, M. L. (1963). Strength to love. Harper and Row. Kiousis, S., Kim, S. Y., McDevitt, M., & Ostrowski, A. (2009). Competing for attention: Information subsidy influence in agenda building during election campaigns. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 86(3), 545-562. Kohring, M., & Matthes, J. (2007). Trust in news media: Development and validation of a multidimensional scale. Communication research, 34(2), 231-252. Lee, S. K., Lindsey, N. J., & Kim, K. S. (2017). The effects of news consumption via social media and news information overload on perceptions of journalistic norms and practices. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 254-263. Lin, L. (2022, June 15). Digital News Report-Taiwan. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/digital-news-report/2022/taiwan Mikolov, T., Chen, K., Corrado, G., & Dean, J. (2013b). Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space. arXiv preprint arXiv:1301.3781. Mikolov, T., Yih, W. T., & Zweig, G. (2013a). Linguistic regularities in continuous space word representations. In Proceedings of the 2013 conference of the north American chapter of the association for computational linguistics: Human language technologies (pp. 746-751). Mueller, J. E. (1973). War, Presidents, & Public Opinion. John Wiley & Sons. Nimmo, D. D., & Combs, J. E. (1990). Mediated political realities. Longman Publishing Group. Ogbodo, J. N., Onwe, E. C., Chukwu, J., Nwasum, C. J., Nwakpu, E. S., Nwankwo, S. U., ... & Ogbaeja, N. I. (2020). Communicating health crisis: a content analysis of global media framing of COVID-19. Health promotion perspectives, 10(3), 257. O'sullivan, J., & Heinonen, A. (2008). Old values, new media: Journalism role perceptions in a changing world. Journalism Practice, 2(3), 357-371. Painter, M., & Qiu, T. (2021). Political beliefs affect compliance with government mandates. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 185, 688-701. Pavlik, J. V. (1997). The future of online journalism. Columbia Journalism Review, 36(2), 30-36. Petrocik, J. R. (1996). Issue ownership in presidential elections, with a 1980 case study. American Journal of Political Science, 40(3), 825–850. Pew Research Center (2021, October 12). Perceptions of conflict between groups much higher in South Korea and U.S., especially between those who support different political parties. https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2021/10/13/diversity-and-division-in-advanced-economies/pg_2021-10-13_diversity_0-02/ Pierson, P. (2004). Politics in time: History, institutions, and social analysis. Princeton University Press. Reporters Sans Frontières (2022). Taiwan Fact-file. https://rsf.org/en/country/taiwan Reveilhac, M., & Morselli, D. (2022). Dictionary-based and machine learning classification approaches: a comparison for tonality and frame detection on Twitter data. Political Research Exchange, 4(1), 2029217. Rice, & Atkin, C. K. (2001). Public communication campaigns (3rd ed.). Sage Publications. Rivers, W.L. (1970). The Adversaries: Politics and the Press. Boston, Beacon Press. Rovny, J., Bakker, R., Hooghe, L., Jolly, S., Marks, G., Polk, J., ... & Vachudova, M. A. (2022). Contesting Covid: The ideological bases of partisan responses to the Covid‐19 pandemic. European Journal of Political Research. Sánchez, A., J. C., Llano Guibarra, N. I., & Pereyra-Zamora, P. (2021). Media Agenda and Press Conferences on COVID-19 in Mexico: An Analysis of Journalists’ Questions. International journal of environmental research and public health, 18(22), 12067. Scarpino, I., Zucco, C., Vallelunga, R., Luzza, F., & Cannataro, M. (2022). Investigating topic modeling techniques to extract meaningful insights in Italian long COVID narration. BioTech, 11(3), 41. Schlesinger, P. (1977). Newsmen and their time-machine. The British Journal of Sociology, 28, 336-350. Schmitt, H. (1983). Party Government in Public Opinion: A European Cross-National Comparison. European Journal of Political Research, 11(4), 353–376. Schudson, M. (1978). The Ideal of Conversation in the Study of Mass Media. Communication Research, 5(3), 320–329. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365027800500306 Schudson, M. (1994). Question Authority: A History of the News Interview in American Journalism, 1860s–1930s. Media, Culture & Society, 16(4), 565–587. Thussu, D. K. (2008). News as entertainment: The rise of global infotainment. Sage. Walgrave, S., Van Aelst, P., & Bennett, L. (2010, September). Beyond agenda-setting. Towards a broader theory of agenda interactions between political actors and the mass media. APSA Annual Meeting, Washington (Vol. 2, No. 5). Woods, J. (2011). The 9/11 Effect: Toward a Social Science of the Terrorist Threat. The Social Science Journal, 48, 213-233. World Health Organization. (2019). Non-pharmaceutical public health measures for mitigating the risk and impact of epidemic and pandemic influenza: annex: report of systematic literature reviews (No. WHO/WHE/IHM/GIP/2019.1). World Health Organization. Wright, A. L., Sonin, K., Driscoll, J., & Wilson, J. (2020). Poverty and economic dislocation reduce compliance with COVID-19 shelter-in-place protocols. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 180, 544-554. Zafri, N. M., Afroj, S., Nafi, I. M., & Hasan, M. M. U. (2021). A content analysis of newspaper coverage of COVID-19 pandemic for developing a pandemic management framework. Heliyon, 7(3), e06544. | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/88010 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 2020年，新冠疫情席捲全球，由於政府在疫情初期的良好防疫表現，臺灣驕傲一時深植民心，然而，此現象僅止於2020年，隨著疫情爆發與常態化，當國家內部超越黨派界線的團結精神減弱，政治運作回到常規狀態，意識形態重新主導社會輿論風向是可預見的結果。疫情由科學問題逐漸轉變為政治問題，使防疫記者會中的記者提問逐漸「逆時中」的過程，是本研究的關注重點。
本研究旨在透過非監督式主題模型BERTopic與人工編碼並行的量化研究方法，探究2020至2022年臺灣中央流行疫情指揮中心舉辦的新冠記者會上，記者提問的主題、框架與策略分佈情形，及三者是否受疫情發展階段、媒體媒介類型與媒體政治立場影響。以聚旗效應與議題互動理論為基礎，檢視記者在新冠記者會上的關注內容，並以提問策略作為記者對抗性的指標，分析記者與政府官員的權力互動情形。 研究結果顯示，記者理解議題的角度，以及與執政黨的權力關係隨疫情發展變化，媒介特性會影響記者在解釋與思考議題時採用的結構及追問程度，媒體政治立場影響記者與政府之間的議題互動模式。證實聚旗效應衰退後，政黨政治重新發揮作用，為健康傳播過程產生極大的政治噪音，並模糊記者會焦點。 現有國際傳播學界的疫情新聞研究大多集中於框架或再現方面，而較少有學者關注健康傳播和政治學兩個領域的重疊，新冠記者會作為全球獨有的健康傳播管道，恰好成為疫情政治學研究的良好素材，本研究期望探索疫情政治化的問題內涵，提供健康傳播研究的另一種視角，也期望能為政治活動守門人——媒體與政黨，帶來不同思路。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | In 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic swept across the globe. Due to the government's initial successful efforts in containing the virus, Taiwan gained pride and support from its people. However, this phenomenon was short-lived as the pandemic persisted and became normalized. With the weakening of the spirit of unity transcending partisan lines and the return to normal political operations, it was foreseeable that ideology would once again dominate the public discourse. This study focuses on the shifting dynamics of press conferences, where journalists' questions gradually deviated from the progression of the pandemic, becoming a topic of interest.
The aim of this study is to employ a quantitative research approach that combines unsupervised topic modeling (BERTopic) and manual coding to explore the topic, frame, and distribution of strategies in the questions posed by journalists during COVID-19 press conferences held by the Taiwan Central Epidemic Command Center from 2020 to 2022. It also investigates the influence of pandemic development stages, media medium types, and media political stances on these aspects. Building upon the rallying-around-the-flag effect and agenda-interaction theories, this research examines the focal points of journalists in COVID-19 press conferences and utilizes question strategies as indicators of journalists' adversarial stance, thereby analyzing the power dynamics between journalists and government officials. The findings indicate that journalists' perspectives and their power relations with the ruling party change with the development of the pandemic. Media characteristics influence the structure and level of follow-up questioning when journalists interpret and contemplate issues. Media political stances affect the interaction patterns between journalists and the government. It is confirmed that after the decline of the rallying-around-the-flag effect, party politics reasserts itself, generating significant political noise in the health communication process and blurring the focus of press conferences. Existing studies in the field of international communication largely focus on framing and representation aspects of pandemic news, with limited attention given to the overlap between health communication and political science. COVID-19 press conferences, as a unique channel for health communication worldwide, provide excellent material for the study of the politicization of the pandemic. This research seeks to explore the implications of the politicization of the pandemic and provide an alternative perspective for health communication research. It also aims to offer different insights to the gatekeepers of political activities—the media and political parties. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2023-08-01T16:23:04Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2023-08-01T16:23:04Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 謝誌 I
摘要 II ABSTRACT III 目錄 V 表目錄 VII 圖目錄 VIII 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景 1 第二節 研究動機 6 第二章 文獻回顧 11 第一節 新冠記者會中的疫情政治學 11 壹、疫情與政治的相互影響 11 貳、新冠記者會中，政府與記者的權力互動 15 第二節 問什麼？怎麼問？記者提問的主題與策略 17 第三節 媒介類型與媒體政治立場 25 第三章 研究方法與步驟 30 第一節 概念定義 30 壹、記者提問主題 30 貳、記者提問框架 30 貳、記者提問策略 31 參、提問疫情階段 34 肆、媒體媒介類型 34 伍、媒體政治立場 34 第二節 研究程序 35 壹、主要運用技術 35 貳、分析步驟 37 第四章 研究結果 40 第一節 新冠記者會中的記者提問主題與框架 40 壹、記者提問主分佈與疫情階段變化 40 貳、新冠記者會中的記者提問框架 50 第二節 提問策略疫的情階段分佈 54 壹、不同疫情階段的記者提問策略：複雜性 55 貳、不同疫情階段的記者提問策略：追問性 56 參、不同疫情階段的記者提問策略：敵意性 58 肆、不同疫情階段的記者提問策略：問責性 59 第三節 媒體媒介類型與提問框架及策略 60 壹、不同媒介類型的記者提問框架 60 貳、不同媒介類型的記者提問策略 63 第四節 媒體政治立場與提問框架及策略 68 壹、不同政治立場的記者提問框架 69 貳、不同政治立場的記者提問策略 70 第五章 研究結論與討論 78 壹、研究簡述與討論 78 貳、記者提問的疫情政治學意涵 82 第六章 研究限制與建議 85 第七章 參考文獻 88 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.subject | 疫情 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 記者提問 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 健康傳播 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 聚旗效應 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 議題互動 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 政治傳播 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | political communication | en |
| dc.subject | agenda interaction | en |
| dc.subject | health communication | en |
| dc.subject | journalist questioning | en |
| dc.subject | pandemic | en |
| dc.subject | rallying-around-the-flag effect | en |
| dc.title | 「新冠記者會」中的疫情政治學：記者提問主題、 框架與策略分析 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Pandemic Politics of COVID-19 Press Conferences: Theme, Frame and Strategy Analyses of Journalists’ Questions | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 111-2 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 謝吉隆;盧鴻毅 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Ji-Lung Hsieh;Hung-Yi LU | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 疫情,記者提問,聚旗效應,議題互動,健康傳播,政治傳播, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | pandemic,journalist questioning,rallying-around-the-flag effect,agenda interaction,health communication,political communication, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 99 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202301124 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(限校園內公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2023-07-07 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 新聞研究所 | - |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2028-06-30 | - |
| Appears in Collections: | 新聞研究所 | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-111-2.pdf Restricted Access | 3.25 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.