請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/88003
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 馬鴻文 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.advisor | Hwong-Wen Ma | en |
dc.contributor.author | 曾子維 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author | Tzu-Wei Tseng | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-08-01T16:20:44Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-11-09 | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2023-08-01 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2023 | - |
dc.date.submitted | 2023-07-05 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | AFP, A. F.-P. (2023). Indonesian farmers fight for their land in nickel mining boom. Retrieved from https://www.france24.com/en/live-news/20230313-indonesian-farmers-fight-for-their-land-in-nickel-mining-boom
Agreement, P. (2015). Paris agreement. Paper presented at the Report of the Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Alayza, N., Bhandari, P., Burns, D., Cogswell, N., de Zoysa, K., Finch, M., . . . Langer, P. (2022). COP27: Key Takeaways and What’s Next. Aliyev, R., Temizkan, H., & Aliyev, R. (2020). Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process-Based Multi-Criteria Decision Making for Universities Ranking. Symmetry, 12(8). doi:10.3390/sym12081351 Apple. (2019). Material Impact Profiles. Retrieved from https://www.apple.com/environment/pdf/Apple_Material_Impact_Profiles_April2019.pdf Apple. (2023). Apple will use 100 percent recycled cobalt in batteries by 2025. Retrieved from https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2023/04/apple-will-use-100-percent-recycled-cobalt-in-batteries-by-2025/ Arshad, F., Lin, J., Manurkar, N., Fan, E., Ahmad, A., Tariq, M.-u.-N., . . . Li, L. (2022). Life Cycle Assessment of Lithium-ion Batteries: A Critical Review. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 180. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106164 Avetisyan, E., Hockerts, K. J. B. S., & Environment, t. (2017). The consolidation of the ESG rating industry as an enactment of institutional retrogression. 26(3), 316-330. Baum, Z. J., Bird, R. E., Yu, X., & Ma, J. (2022). Lithium-Ion Battery Recycling─Overview of Techniques and Trends. ACS Energy Letters, 7(2), 712-719. doi:10.1021/acsenergylett.1c02602 Bensch, S., Kolotzek, C., Helbig, C., Thorenz, A., & Tuma, A. (2015). Decision support system for the sustainability assessment of critical raw materials in SMEs. Paper presented at the 2015 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Bibra, E. M., Connelly, E., Dhir, S., Drtil, M., Henriot, P., Hwang, I., . . . Teter, J. (2022). Global EV outlook 2022: Securing supplies for an electric future. Bongartz, L., Shammugam, S., Gervais, E., & Schlegl, T. (2021). Multidimensional criticality assessment of metal requirements for lithium-ion batteries in electric vehicles and stationary storage applications in Germany by 2050. Journal of Cleaner Production, 292. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126056 Brzeszczyński, J., & McIntosh, G. J. J. o. b. e. (2014). Performance of portfolios composed of British SRI stocks. 120, 335-362. Buckley, J. J. (1985). Fuzzy hierarchical analysis. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 17(3), 233-247. doi:10.1016/0165-0114(85)90090-9 Cheruga, B., Liron, R., & Canavera, M. (2020). Ensuring children’s social protection in the Democratic Republic of the Congo: A case study of combating child labour in the copper-cobalt belt. 273. Ciez, R. E., & Whitacre, J. F. (2019). Examining different recycling processes for lithium-ion batteries. Nature Sustainability, 2(2), 148-156. doi:10.1038/s41893-019-0222-5 DOE, U. S. D. o. E. (2023). Electric Vehicle Battery Pack Costs in 2022 Are Nearly 90% Lower than in 2008, according to DOE Estimates. Retrieved from https://www.energy.gov/eere/vehicles/articles/fotw-1272-january-9-2023-electric-vehicle-battery-pack-costs-2022-are-nearly DOS, T. U. S. D. o. S. (2019). 2019 Trafficking in Persons Report. Duclos, S. J., Otto, J. P., & Konitzer, D. G. (2010). Design in an era of Constrained Resources. Mechanical Engineering, 132(09), 36-40. doi:10.1115/1.2010-Sep-3 EJAtlas, E. J. A. (2023). Mining conflicts in Latin America. Retrieved from https://ejatlas.org/featured/mining-latam Erdmann, L., & Graedel, T. E. (2011). Criticality of non-fuel minerals: a review of major approaches and analyses. Environ Sci Technol, 45(18), 7620-7630. doi:10.1021/es200563g Fleischmann, J., Hanicke, M., Horetsky, E., Ibrahim, D., Jautelat, S., Linder, M., . . . van de Rijt, A. (2023). Battery 2030: Resilient, sustainable, and circular. FREEDOM, d. f. (2020). Steel’s tensile strength and low cost can have a high human cost. Retrieved from https://www.designforfreedom.org/get-the-facts/steels-tensile-strength-and-low-cost-can-have-a-high-human-cost/ Frenzel, M., Kullik, J., Reuter, M. A., & Gutzmer, J. (2017). Raw material ‘criticality’—sense or nonsense? Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 50(12). doi:10.1088/1361-6463/aa5b64 Gaustad, G., Krystofik, M., Bustamante, M., & Badami, K. (2018). Circular economy strategies for mitigating critical material supply issues. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 135, 24-33. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.08.002 Glöser, S., Tercero Espinoza, L., Gandenberger, C., & Faulstich, M. (2015). Raw material criticality in the context of classical risk assessment. Resources Policy, 44, 35-46. doi:10.1016/j.resourpol.2014.12.003 Graedel, T. E., Allwood, J., Birat, J.-P., Buchert, M., Hagelüken, C., Reck, B. K., . . . Sonnemann, G. (2011). What Do We Know About Metal Recycling Rates? Journal of Industrial Ecology, 15(3), 355-366. doi:10.1111/j.1530-9290.2011.00342.x Graedel, T. E., Barr, R., Chandler, C., Chase, T., Choi, J., Christoffersen, L., . . . Zhu, C. (2012). Methodology of metal criticality determination. Environ Sci Technol, 46(2), 1063-1070. doi:10.1021/es203534z Graedel, T. E., & Reck, B. K. (2016). Six Years of Criticality Assessments: What Have We Learned So Far? Journal of Industrial Ecology, 20(4), 692-699. doi:10.1111/jiec.12305 Griffin, G., Gaustad, G., & Badami, K. (2019). A framework for firm-level critical material supply management and mitigation. Resources Policy, 60, 262-276. doi:10.1016/j.resourpol.2018.12.008 Gunn, G. (2014). Critical metals handbook: John Wiley & Sons. Hallstedt, S. I., & Isaksson, O. (2017). Material criticality assessment in early phases of sustainable product development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 161, 40-52. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.085 Harper, G., Sommerville, R., Kendrick, E., Driscoll, L., Slater, P., Stolkin, R., . . . Anderson, P. (2019). Recycling lithium-ion batteries from electric vehicles. Nature, 575(7781), 75-86. doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1682-5 Helbig, C., Wietschel, L., Thorenz, A., & Tuma, A. (2016). How to evaluate raw material vulnerability - An overview. Resources Policy, 48, 13-24. doi:10.1016/j.resourpol.2016.02.003 Henckens, T. (2021). Scarce mineral resources: Extraction, consumption and limits of sustainability. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 169. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105511 Holland, M. (2020). Reducing the health risks of the copper, rare earth and cobalt industries: Transition to a circular low-carbon economy. IAI, I. A. I. (2022). Report Reveals Global Aluminium Demand to Reach New Highs After Covid. Retrieved from https://international-aluminium.org/report-reveals-global-aluminium-demand-to-reach-new-highs-after-covid/ ICA, I. C. A. (2021). Copper Recycling. Retrieved from https://copperalliance.org/resource/copper-recycling/ IEA, I. E. A. (2021). The role of critical minerals in clean energy transitions (9264679944). Retrieved from https://www.iea.org/reports/the-role-of-critical-minerals-in-clean-energy-transitions IEA, I. E. A. (2022). End-of-life recycling rates for selected metals. In. Paris: IEA. ILAB, T. B. o. I. L. A. (2022). List of Goods Produced by Child Labor or Forced Labor. Retrieved from https://www.dol.gov/agencies/ilab/reports/child-labor/list-of-goods?combine=&field_exp_exploitation_type_target_id_1=All&tid=All&field_exp_good_target_id=All&items_per_page=10&order=name&sort=asc&page=14 ISO, I. O. f. S. (2006a). Environmental management: life cycle assessment: principles and framework. 14040. ISO, I. O. f. S. (2006b). Environmental management: life cycle assessment: requirements and guidelines. 14044. Jain, M., Sharma, G. D., & Srivastava, M. J. R. (2019). Can sustainable investment yield better financial returns: A comparative study of ESG indices and MSCI indices. 7(1), 15. Jena, K. K., AlFantazi, A., & Mayyas, A. T. (2021). Comprehensive Review on Concept and Recycling Evolution of Lithium-Ion Batteries (LIBs). Energy & Fuels, 35(22), 18257-18284. doi:10.1021/acs.energyfuels.1c02489 Julio, A. A. V., Milessi, T. S., Ocampo Batlle, E. A., Silva Lora, E. E., Yepes Maya, D. M., & Escobar Palacio, J. C. (2022). Techno-economic and environmental potential of Renewable Diesel as complementation for diesel and biodiesel in Brazil: A comprehensive review and perspectives. Journal of Cleaner Production, 371. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133431 Kannan, D., Khodaverdi, R., Olfat, L., Jafarian, A., & Diabat, A. (2013). Integrated fuzzy multi criteria decision making method and multi-objective programming approach for supplier selection and order allocation in a green supply chain. Journal of Cleaner Production, 47, 355-367. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.02.010 Kapesa, R., Mwitwa, J., Chikumbi, D. C. J. S. A. P., & Studies, S. (2015). Social Conflict in the Context of the Development of New mining Concessions in Zambia. 4(2), 41-62. Karabelli, D., Kiemel, S., Singh, S., Koller, J., Ehrenberger, S., Miehe, R., . . . Birke, K. P. (2020). Tackling xEV Battery Chemistry in View of Raw Material Supply Shortfalls. Frontiers in Energy Research, 8. doi:10.3389/fenrg.2020.594857 Katz-Lavigne, S. (2019). Artisanal copper mining and conflict at the intersection of property rights and corporate strategies in the Democratic Republic of Congo. The Extractive Industries and Society, 6(2), 399-406. doi:10.1016/j.exis.2018.12.001 Kim, J., Lee, J., Kim, B., & Kim, J. (2019). Raw material criticality assessment with weighted indicators: An application of fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. Resources Policy, 60, 225-233. doi:10.1016/j.resourpol.2019.01.005 Knobloch, V., Zimmermann, T., & Gößling-Reisemann, S. (2018). From criticality to vulnerability of resource supply: The case of the automobile industry. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 138, 272-282. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.05.027 Kolotzek, C., Helbig, C., Thorenz, A., Reller, A., & Tuma, A. (2018). A company-oriented model for the assessment of raw material supply risks, environmental impact and social implications. Journal of Cleaner Production, 176, 566-580. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.162 Krausmann, F., Wiedenhofer, D., Lauk, C., Haas, W., Tanikawa, H., Fishman, T., . . . Haberl, H. (2017). Global socioeconomic material stocks rise 23-fold over the 20th century and require half of annual resource use. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 114(8), 1880-1885. doi:10.1073/pnas.1613773114 Lapko, Y., Trucco, P., & Nuur, C. (2016). The business perspective on materials criticality: Evidence from manufacturers. Resources Policy, 50, 93-107. doi:10.1016/j.resourpol.2016.09.001 Larcker, D. F., Pomorski, L., Tayan, B., & Watts, E. M. (2022). ESG ratings: A compass without direction. Larsson, F., Andersson, P., Blomqvist, P., & Mellander, B. E. (2018). Author Correction: Toxic fluoride gas emissions from lithium-ion battery fires. Sci Rep, 8(1), 5265. doi:10.1038/s41598-018-22957-8 Lehmen, A. J. A. L. (2021). The rise of ESG Law: in search of lost time. 2. Li, T.-T., Wang, K., Sueyoshi, T., & Wang, D. D. J. S. (2021). ESG: Research progress and future prospects. 13(21), 11663. Lo, S. F., & Sheu, H. J. J. C. G. A. I. R. (2007). Is corporate sustainability a value‐increasing strategy for business? , 15(2), 345-358. Mackenzie, W. (2020). LFP to overtake NMC as dominant stationary storage chemistry by 2030. 17, 2020. Mahad, N. F., Yusof, N., & Ismail, N. F. (2019). The application of fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) approach to solve multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) problems. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1358(1). doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1358/1/012081 Mathew, M. (2018). Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) - Using Geometric Mean. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5k3Wz1AfVWs&t=355s&ab_channel=ManojMathew Mayyas, A., Steward, D., & Mann, M. (2019). The case for recycling: Overview and challenges in the material supply chain for automotive li-ion batteries. Sustainable Materials and Technologies, 19. doi:10.1016/j.susmat.2018.e00087 MCA, M. C. o. A. (2021). Commodity Demand Outlook 2030. Retrieved from https://minerals.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Commodity-Outlook-2030.pdf Michael, Z. H., Ralph, K. R., & Stig, I. O. (2018). Life Cycle Assessment: Theory and Practice. In: Spinger. Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. 63(2), 81. Montoya, A. T., Yang, Z., Dahl, E. U., Pupek, K. Z., Polzin, B., Dunlop, A., & Vaughey, J. T. (2022). Direct Recycling of Lithium-Ion Battery Cathodes: A Multi-Stage Annealing Process to Recover the Pristine Structure and Performance. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 10(40), 13319-13324. doi:10.1021/acssuschemeng.2c02643 MSCI, M. S. C. I. (2023). ESG Ratings Key Issue Framework. Retrieved from https://www.msci.com/our-solutions/esg-investing/esg-ratings/esg-ratings-key-issue-framework Nayl, A. A., Elkhashab, R. A., Badawy, S. M., & El-Khateeb, M. A. (2017). Acid leaching of mixed spent Li-ion batteries. Arabian Journal of Chemistry, 10, S3632-S3639. doi:10.1016/j.arabjc.2014.04.001 Normile, D. (2021). Genetics papers from China face ethical scrutiny. In: American Association for the Advancement of Science. Notter, D. A., Gauch, M., Widmer, R., Wager, P., Stamp, A., Zah, R., & Althaus, H. J. (2010). Contribution of Li-ion batteries to the environmental impact of electric vehicles. Environ Sci Technol, 44(17), 6550-6556. doi:10.1021/es903729a NRC, N. R. C. (2008). Minerals, critical minerals, and the US economy: National Academies Press. O’Driscoll, D. (2017). Overview of child labour in the artisanal and small-scale mining sector in Asia and Africa. Oguztimur, S. (2023). Why Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process Approach For Transport Problems? Peng, G., Han, L., Liu, Z., Guo, Y., Yan, J., & Jia, X. (2021). An Application of Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process in Risk Evaluation Model. Front Psychol, 12, 715003. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.715003 Peng, Y., Yang, L., Ju, X., Liao, B., Ye, K., Li, L., . . . Ni, Y. (2020). A comprehensive investigation on the thermal and toxic hazards of large format lithium-ion batteries with LiFePO(4) cathode. J Hazard Mater, 381, 120916. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.120916 Prause, L. (2020). Conflicts related to resources: The case of cobalt mining in the Democratic Republic of Congo. In The material basis of energy transitions (pp. 153-167): Elsevier. PRNewswire. (2023). Global Manganese Market to Reach 39.3 Million Metric Tons by 2030. Retrieved from https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/global-manganese-market-to-reach-39-3-million-metric-tons-by-2030--301768783.html Raj, T., Chandrasekhar, K., Kumar, A. N., Sharma, P., Pandey, A., Jang, M., . . . Kim, S. H. (2022). Recycling of cathode material from spent lithium-ion batteries: Challenges and future perspectives. J Hazard Mater, 429, 128312. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.128312 Russo, R. d. F. S. M., & Camanho, R. (2015). Criteria in AHP: A Systematic Review of Literature. Procedia Computer Science, 55, 1123-1132. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2015.07.081 Saaty, T. L. (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences, 1(1). doi:10.1504/ijssci.2008.017590 Sachs, J., Kroll, C., Lafortune, G., Fuller, G., & Woelm, F. (2022). Sustainable development report 2022: Cambridge University Press. Satty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process, analytic hierarchy process. In: McGraw-Hill, New York, NY. Sethurajan, M., van Hullebusch, E. D., Fontana, D., Akcil, A., Deveci, H., Batinic, B., . . . Chmielarz, A. (2019). Recent advances on hydrometallurgical recovery of critical and precious elements from end of life electronic wastes - a review. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 49(3), 212-275. doi:10.1080/10643389.2018.1540760 Škare, M., & Golja, T. J. E. r.-E. i. (2012). Corporate social responsibility and corporate financial performance–is there a link? (1), 215-242. Sommerfeld, M., Vonderstein, C., Dertmann, C., Klimko, J., Oráč, D., Miškufová, A., . . . Friedrich, B. (2020). A Combined Pyro- and Hydrometallurgical Approach to Recycle Pyrolyzed Lithium-Ion Battery Black Mass Part 1: Production of Lithium Concentrates in an Electric Arc Furnace. Metals, 10(8). doi:10.3390/met10081069 Stone, M. J. N. G. (2021). As electric vehicles take off, we’ll need to recycle their batteries. 19. Sun, B., Tang, J., Yu, D., Song, Z., & Wang, P. (2019). Ecosystem health assessment: A PSR analysis combining AHP and FCE methods for Jiaozhou Bay, China1. Ocean & Coastal Management, 168, 41-50. doi:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2018.10.026 Swanson, A., & Buckley, C. (2022). Red Flags for Forced Labor Found in China’s Car Battery Supply Chain. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2022/06/20/business/economy/forced-labor-china-supply-chain.html Taylor, J., Vithayathil, J., Yim, D. J. C. s. r., & management, e. (2018). Are corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiatives such as sustainable development and environmental policies value enhancing or window dressing? , 25(5), 971-980. Tradingeconomics. (2023). Historical metal prices. Retrieved from: https://tradingeconomics.com/commodity/aluminum UNEP, U. E. P. (2011). Recycling Rates of Metals – A Status Report. A Report of the Working Group on Global Metal Flows to the International Resource Panel. Retrieved from https://www.resourcepanel.org/reports/recycling-rates-metals USGS, U. S. G. S. (2023). Mineral commodity summaries 2023. Retrieved from https://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/mcs2023 van Laarhoven, P. J. M., & Pedrycz, W. (1983). A fuzzy extension of Saaty's priority theory. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 11(1-3), 229-241. doi:10.1016/s0165-0114(83)80082-7 Vinayak, A. K., Xu, Z., Li, G., & Wang, X. (2023). Current Trends in Sourcing, Recycling, and Regeneration of Spent Lithium-Ion Batteries—A Review. Renewables, 1-22. doi:10.31635/renewables.023.202200008 Vives, A., Wadhwa, B. J. J. o. S. F., & Investment. (2012). Sustainability indices in emerging markets: Impact on responsible practices and financial market development. 2(3-4), 318-337. Wang, M., Liu, K., Dutta, S., Alessi, D. S., Rinklebe, J., Ok, Y. S., & Tsang, D. C. W. (2022). Recycling of lithium iron phosphate batteries: Status, technologies, challenges, and prospects. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 163. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2022.112515 Wang, Q. S., Sun, J. H., Chu, G. Q., Yao, X. L., & Chen, C. H. (2007). Effect of LiPF6 on the thermal behaviors of four organic solvents for lithium ion batteries. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 89(1), 245-250. doi:10.1007/s10973-006-7534-1 Wiemers-Meyer, S., Jeremias, S., Winter, M., & Nowak, S. (2016). Influence of Battery Cell Components and Water on the Thermal and Chemical Stability of LiPF6 Based Lithium Ion Battery Electrolytes. Electrochimica Acta, 222, 1267-1271. doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2016.11.100 Yudhistira, R., Khatiwada, D., & Sanchez, F. (2022). A comparative life cycle assessment of lithium-ion and lead-acid batteries for grid energy storage. Journal of Cleaner Production, 358. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131999 Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8(3), 338-353. doi:10.1016/s0019-9958(65)90241-x Zhou, L. F., Yang, D., Du, T., Gong, H., & Luo, W. B. (2020). The Current Process for the Recycling of Spent Lithium Ion Batteries. Front Chem, 8, 578044. doi:10.3389/fchem.2020.578044 中華民國經濟部. (2021). 推動能源轉型「展綠、增氣、減煤、非核」. Retrieved from https://www.moea.gov.tw/MNS/populace/Policy/Policy.aspx?menu_id=32800&policy_id=9 王詠梅. (2020). 台灣鋰離子電池產業發展驅動力之研究. (碩士), 國立臺北科技大學, 臺北市. 王釿鋊、邱炳嶔、許湘琴、劉致峻. (2019). 儲能產業在能源轉型趨勢下的機會與挑戰. 中技社專題報告. 王儷涵. (2021). 基於生命週期與隨機 AHP 法評估坡地溪流整治工程之成效. (碩士), 國立臺灣大學, 台北市. 台灣電池協會. (2023). 產業鏈. Retrieved from http://www.taiwanbattery.org.tw/about/cluster 行政院. (2023). 能源轉型,打造綠能科技島 —綠能科技產業創新推動方案. Retrieved from https://www.ey.gov.tw/Page/5A8A0CB5B41DA11E/f381fa3b-711b-43c1-a043-50569a01d318 呂學隆. (2013). 台灣鋰電池產業結構與發展現況. 李洪枚, & 姜亢. (2004). 廢舊鋰離子電池對環境污染的分析與對策. 上海環境科學, 23(5), 201-230. 林宜諄. (2008). 企業社會責任入門手冊. 臺北: 天下文化. 金融監督管理委員會. (2020). 公司治理簡介. Retrieved from https://www.sfb.gov.tw/ch/home.jsp?id=882&parentpath=0%2C8 黃建中, 太原麗子, 呂學隆, 林幸慧, 邱勝正, & 楊昌中. (2019). 電池檢測與階梯式再利用探討. Paper presented at the 能源科技產品暨檢測技術論文研討會. 楊敏生. (1994). 模糊理論簡介. 楊絡懸. (2022). 電動車起火難撲滅!「兩大電池陣營」安全大車拼:台泥、台塑、鴻海選邊站?. Retrieved from https://tw.stock.yahoo.com/news/electric-car-battery-230026124.html 經濟部. (2022). 臺灣2050淨零轉型 「電力系統與儲能」 關鍵戰略行動計畫 (核定本) Retrieved from https://ws.ndc.gov.tw/Download.ashx?u=LzAwMS9hZG1pbmlzdHJhdG9yLzEwL3JlbGZpbGUvMC8xNTAyOC8yZjkxMTI4Zi03ZDM1LTQ5NTUtOTY5Mi1lZTI4NjU5NzlmODIucGRm&n=MDRf6Zu75Yqb57O757Wx6IiH5YSy6IO96Zec6Y215oiw55Wl6KGM5YuV6KiI55WrKOaguOWumuacrCkucGRm&icon=.pdf 褚志鵬. (2009). 層級分析法 (AHP) 理論與實作: 才華有限實驗室. 蔡明瞭, 林民禾, 杜景順, & 劉文龍. (2013). 以電沉積法由廢鋰離子電池中回收有價金屬. Paper presented at the 綠色科技工程與應用研討會. 蔡淑儀, 黃柏源, 張立甫, & 方冠榮. (2019). 一日千「鋰」─動力鋰離子電池正極材料. 科學發展, 564, 6-10. 鄧振源. (2012). 多準則決策分析: 方法與應用: 鼎茂圖書. 盧怡靜, & 呂穎彬. (2014). ISO 14040 生命週期評估的下一步. 永續產業發展, 66, 29-35. 賴俊諾. (2017). 廢鋰電池中金屬鈷回收技術開發. (碩士論文), 國立中山大學, 高雄市. 戴成真. (2022). 公司績效和環境、社會與治理(ESG)之關聯性:疫情期間ESG的價值. (碩士論文), 中信金融管理學院, 臺南市. | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/88003 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 隨著人口增加與經濟發展,物料需求的快速增長考驗著供應鏈的彈性,同時也對環境和社會帶來衝擊,因此企業需要建立一套方法來挑選出對企業治理、環境及社會影響極大的關鍵物料,提升企業實現永續發展的能力。
本研究以模糊層級分析法為主軸,透過文獻回顧及問卷進行指標篩選與權重分析,建立了以企業為導向、考量ESG的關鍵物料評估模型。環境面向包括生命週期評估的三個終點指標:人體健康、生態系統以及資源耗用;社會面向包括武裝衝突、童工、遵守勞工權利、生活環境、工作環境以及強迫勞役六個指標;治理面向包括物料成本、未來市場需求、國家生產集中度、替代性、回收性以及現階段市場需求六個指標。 為了驗證模型的適用性,我們運用此模型評估儲能單元中鋰電池其金屬成分的關鍵性,結果顯示銅是ESG整體關鍵性最高的物料,其環境面向的關鍵性也是最高;鋰是ESG整體關鍵性次高,其治理面向的關鍵性遠高於其他物料;鈷是社會面向關鍵性最高的物料。隨後驗證管理策略中的回收方法對於減輕物料關鍵性的效果,結果顯示火法冶金法能夠顯著地降低銅於環境面向及ESG整體的關鍵性,但火法冶金法和濕法冶金法皆難以有效降低鋰的關鍵性。 本研究所開發的關鍵物料評估模型具備ESG視角,且易於操作、使用量化指標、方便視覺化呈現,能夠協助企業找出關鍵物料,判別其關鍵性熱點,及早規劃管理策略,減少ESG所衍生的風險,並創造提升ESG評級的機會,發展企業永續競爭力。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | With the increasing population and economic development, the rapid growth in material demand tests the flexibility of supply chains and also impacts the environment and society. Therefore, companies need to establish a method to identify critical materials that have significant impacts on corporate governance, environment, and society to enhance their ability to achieve sustainable development.
This study applied the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and utilizes literature review and questionnaire for indicator selection and weight analysis to establishes an assessment model for critical materials considering the enterprise-oriented and ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance). The environmental dimension includes three endpoint indicators of life cycle assessment: human health, ecosystem quality, and resource depletion. The social dimension includes six indicators: armed conflicts, child labor, compliance with labor rights, living environment, working environment, and forced labor. The governance dimension includes six indicators: material cost, future market demand, country concentration of production, substitutability, recyclability, and current market demand. To demonstrate the applicability of the model, we applied this model to assess the criticality of metal components in lithium batteries within energy storage units. The results showed that copper is the material with the highest overall ESG criticality, and it also has the highest environmental criticality. Lithium ranks second in overall ESG criticality, with significantly higher governance criticality compared to other materials. Cobalt has the highest social criticality. Subsequently, we verified the effectiveness of recycling methods in mitigating material criticality. The results indicated that pyrometallurgical methods can significantly reduce the environmental and overall ESG criticality of copper. However, both pyrometallurgical and hydrometallurgical methods are ineffective in reducing the criticality of lithium. The critical material assessment model developed in this study, has an ESG perspective, is user-friendly, employs quantitative indicators, and facilitates visual presentation. It can assist companies in identifying critical materials, determining their critical hotspots, planning management strategies in advance. Therefore, it can help companies reduce ESG-related risks, create opportunities to enhance ESG ratings, and develop sustainable competitiveness. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2023-08-01T16:20:44Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2023-08-01T16:20:44Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 誌謝 i
中文摘要 iii Abstract iv 圖目錄 viii 表目錄 x 第一章 緒論 1 1.1 研究緣起 1 1.2 研究目的 3 1.3 研究架構 3 第二章 文獻回顧 5 2.1 關鍵物料 5 2.1.1 關鍵物料之定義 5 2.1.2 企業導向關鍵物料評估模型之相關研究 6 2.2 ESG 18 2.2.1 ESG之起源 18 2.2.2 ESG之概念與定義 19 2.2.3 ESG之評級標準 20 2.3 儲能單元 22 2.3.1 儲能需求之發展 22 2.3.2 儲能單元類型之趨勢 24 2.3.3 國內電池產業概述 26 2.3.4 儲能單元管理策略 28 第三章 研究方法 33 3.1 研究流程 33 3.2 傳統層級分析法(AHP) 34 3.2.1 傳統層級分析法(AHP)之介紹 34 3.2.2 傳統層級分析法(AHP)之應用流程 35 3.2.3 傳統層級分析法(AHP)之優缺點 41 3.3 模糊層級分析法(FAHP) 42 3.4 評估模型之指標整理 44 3.5 問卷設計及調查對象 46 3.5.1 篩選指標之第一次問卷 46 3.5.2 分析權重之第二次問卷 48 3.6 各指標評分方法之建立 48 3.7 生命週期評估 54 第四章 結果與討論 56 4.1 關鍵物料評估模型 56 4.1.1指標篩選 56 4.1.2權重分析 58 4.1.3模型結構 62 4.2 儲能單元案例探討 63 4.2.1環境面向分析 63 4.2.2社會面向分析 66 4.2.3治理面向分析 70 4.2.4 ESG整體關鍵性分析 76 4.2.5關鍵性熱點分析 77 4.3 儲能單元關鍵物料之管理策略評估 79 4.4 討論 83 第五章 結論與建議 85 參考文獻 88 附錄 98 | - |
dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
dc.title | 建立考量ESG的關鍵物料評估模型:以儲能單元為例 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Developing an Assessment Model for Critical Materials Based on ESG: A Case Study of Energy Storage Units | en |
dc.type | Thesis | - |
dc.date.schoolyear | 111-2 | - |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 李公哲;黃建中 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Kung-Cheh Li;Chien-Chung Huang | en |
dc.subject.keyword | 關鍵物料,ESG,儲能單元,鋰電池,回收, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | critical material,ESG,energy storage unit,lithium battery,recycling, | en |
dc.relation.page | 111 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202301331 | - |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | - |
dc.date.accepted | 2023-07-05 | - |
dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | - |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 環境工程學研究所 | - |
顯示於系所單位: | 環境工程學研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-111-2.pdf | 4.66 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。