請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/87951
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 陳思賢 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.advisor | Sy-shyan Chen | en |
dc.contributor.author | 本杰明 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author | Benjamin Jackson | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-07-31T16:30:12Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-11-09 | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2023-07-31 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2023 | - |
dc.date.submitted | 2023-06-15 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Abel, Theodore F. 1948. “The Operation Called Verstehen." American Journal of Sociology 54(3): 211-218.
Adler, E. and V. Pouliot. 2011. “International Practices.” International Theory 3(1): 1-36. Agence France-Presse. 2022.“Hong Kong demands UK-based rights group shut down website.” The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/mar/14/ hong-kong-watch-rights-group-website-national-security-law-china-benedict- rogers. Latest update 14 March 2022. Alexander, J.C. 2004. “Toward a Theory of Cultural Trauma.” In Cultural Trauma and Collective Identity, eds. Jeffrey C. Alexander, Ron Eyerman, Bernhard Giesen, Neil J. Smelser and Piotr Sztompka. Oakland: University of California Press, 1-30. Alitto, Guy S. 1999. Shijie fanweinei de fanxiandaihua sichao: lun wenhua shouchengzhiyi (世界范围内的反现代化思潮一论文化守成主义/Anti- modernization thought trends in a world-wide perspective: on cultural conservatism). Guiyang: Guizhou Renmin Chubanshe. Anderson, Benedict. 1991. Imagined Communities. London: Verso. (Original work published in 1983). Ang, Yuanyuan. 2020. China’s Gilded Age: The Paradox of Economic Boom and Vast Corruption. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Apel, Karl-Otto. 1977. “The A Priori of Communication and the Foundation of the Humanities.” In Understanding and Social Inquiry, eds. Fred R. Dallmayr and Thomas McCarthy. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 292-315. Aristotle. 1934. Nicomachean Ethics (H. Rackham, Trans.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Atterton, P. and M. Calarco. 2005. On Levinas. Belmont: Wadsworth. Augé, Marc. 1995. Non-Places: An Introduction an Anthology of Supermodernity. London: Verso. Backhouse, E. and J.O.P. Bland. 1914. Annals and Memoirs of the Court of Peking. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. Badie, Bertrand. 2020. “Today’s international relations are primarily social.” iD4D. https://ideas4development.org/en/international-relations-primarily-social/. Latest update 28 September 2020. Barkin, J.S., and L. Sjoberg. 2019. International Relations' Last Synthesis? Decoupling Constructivist and Critical Approaches. Oxford: Oxford University Press. BBC. 2022. “China diplomats leave UK over Manchester protester attack.” https:// www.bbc.com/news/uk-63972640. Last updated 14 December, 2022. BBC. 2023a. “Suppressing China won't make America great - Chinese Foreign Minister Qin Gang.” https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-64871808. Last updated 7 March, 2023. BBC, 2023b. “Rivals Iran and Saudi Arabia hold first high-level talks in seven years”. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-65197717. Last updated 6 April 2023. Becker, Douglas J. 2014. “Memory and Trauma as elements of identity in foreign policymaking.” In Memory and Trauma in International Relations: Theories, cases and debates, eds. Erica Resende and Dovile Budryte. Routledge: London and New York, 57-73. Bedford, O. and K.K. Hwang. 2003. “Guilt and Shame in Chinese Culture: A Cross- cultural Framework from the Perspective of Morality and Identity.” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 33(2): 127-144. Beiser, Frederick C. 1993. “Hegel’s Historicism.” In The Cambridge Companion to Hegel, ed. Frederick Beiser. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Benjamin, Walter. 1968. Illuminations: Essays and Reflections. New York: Schocken Books. Bennett, W. Lance. 1990. “Toward a theory of press-state relations in the United States." Journal of Communication 40(2): 103-127. Berger, P. L. and T. Luckmann. 1966. The Social Construction of Reality. Harmondsworth: Penguin. Brown, Chris. 2012. “The ‘Practice Turn’, Phronesis and Classical Realism: Towards a Phronetic Political Theory?” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 40(3): 439-56. Callahan, William A. 2010. China the Pessoptimist Nation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Callahan, William A. 2015. “Identity and security in China: the negative soft power of the China Dream.” Politics 35(3–4): 216–229. Campbell, David. 1993. Politics without Principle: Sovereignty, Ethics, and the Narratives of the Gulf War. Boulder: Lynne Rienner. Carr, W. and S. Kemmis. 1986. Becoming Critical: Knowing through Action Research. Geelong: Deakin University Press. Castells, Manuel. 2007. “Communication, Power and Counter-power in the Network Society.” International Journal of Communication 1: 238-266. CGTN. 2023. “Xi proposes Global Civilization Initiative.” https://news.cgtn.com/news/ 2023-03-15/Xi-proposes-Global-Civilization-Initiative-1icgxtDI3Go/index.html. Last updated 22 March 2023. Chakrabarty, Dipesh. 2000. Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Chen, An. hua xin (華心/The Heart of Being Hua). In quantangwen (全唐文), scroll 767. https://ctext.org/wiki.pl?if=gb&chapter=450141#p72. Retrieved 21 April 2023. Chen, Jian. 2001. Mao’s China and the Cold War. Chapel hill: The University of North Carolina Press. Cheng, Y. and Y. Wang. 2015. tianming: yi ge xin lingdaoxing guojia de dansheng (天 命:一个新领导型国家的诞生/Mandate of Heave - The Birth of a New Type of Leader Nation). Beijing: Zhongguo Dangan. Cheng, Yawen. 2023. “Building the New “Three Rings”: The Choice of China Under the Threat of a Full Decoupling.” Wenhua Zongheng 1(1): 40-54. Chung, Jacob. 2021. “‘Bolixin’ dazhan xiaofenhong baohong! Weibo bei jin: wo hai you IG, FB” (《玻璃心》大戰小粉紅爆紅! 微博被禁 陳芳語:我還有IG、FB》/ “Fragile” fighting the little pinks go’s viral. Banned from Weibo. Kimberley Chen: I still have IG and FB). Radio Taiwan International. https:// www.rti.org.tw/news/view/id/2114441. Last updated 1 July 2021. Ciuta, F. 2007. “Narratives of Security: Strategy and Identity in the European Context.” In Discursive Constructions of Identity in European Politics, ed. Richard Mole. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 190–207. Clark, Ian. 2014. "International Society and China: The Power of Norms and the Norms of Power.” Chinese Journal of International Politics 7(3): 315–340. Cohen, Paul A. 2003. China Unbound: Evolving Perspectives on the Chinese Past. London and New York: Routledge. Cox, Robert W. 2000. “Thinking About Civilisations.” Review of International Studies 26: 217-234. Crossley, Pamela Kyle. 1997. The Manchus. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. Dag Hammarskjöld Library. 2023. “UN Security Council Meetings & Outcomes Tables.” https://research.un.org/en/docs/sc/quick/veto. Retrieved 19th April 2023. Dallmayr, Fred. 2009. “Hermeneutics and inter-cultural dialog: linking theory and practice.” Ethics and Global Politics 2(1): 23-39. Davidson, Helen. 2022. “New Hong Kong textbooks ‘will claim city never was a British colony’.” The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/jun/ 15/new-hong-kong-textbooks-will-claim-city-never-was-a-british-colony. Latest update 15 June 2022. Davies, Gloria. 2007. Worrying About China: the Language of Chinese Critical Inquiry. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Davies, Gloria. 2020. “A Dream of Perpetual Rule.” In China Dreams, eds. Jane Golley, Linda Jaivin, Ben Hillman and Sharon Strange. Canberra: ANU Press, 18-32. Denyer, Simon. 2018. “Gap apologizes to China over map on T-shirt that omits Taiwan, South China Sea.” The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/ news/worldviews/wp/2018/05/15/u-s-retailer-gap-apologizes-to-china-over- map-on-t-shirt-that-omits-taiwan-south-china-sea/. Last updated 15 May 2018. Dienstag, Joshua Foa. 2016. “Hans-Georg Gadamer, Truth and Method.” In The Oxford Handbook of Classics in Contemporary Political Theory, ed. Jacob T. Levy, online edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Retrieved October 2, 2022 from https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198717133.013.20. Dreyer, June T. 2015. “The ‘Tianxia Trope’: will China change the international system?” Journal of Contemporary China 24 (96): 1015-1031. Dunne, T., L. Hansen, and C. Wight. 2013. “The end of International Relations theory?" European Journal of International Relations 19(3): 405–425. Elliott, Mark C. 2001. The Manchu Way: The Eight Banners and Ethnic Identity in Late Imperial China. Redwood City: Stanford University Press. English Standard Version Bible. 2023. King James Bible Online. https:// www.kingjamesbibleonline.org Farrands, Chris. 2010. “Gadamer’s enduring influence in international relations - interpretation in Gadamer, Ricoeur and beyond.” In International Relations Theory and Philosophy - Interpretive Dialogues, eds. Cerwyn Moore and Chris Farrands. London and New York: Routledge, 33-45. Febvre, Lucien. 1982. The problem of unbelief in the Sixteenth Century: The Religion of Rabelais (B. Gottlieb, Trans.). Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press. Feng, E. and S. Neuman. 2020. “China Expels 3 'Wall Street Journal' Reporters, Citing 'Racist' Headline.” NPR. https://www.npr.org/2020/02/19/807294777/china- expels-3-wall-street-journal-reporters-citing-racist-editorial. Last updated 19 February, 2020. Fewsmith, Joseph. 2018. "The 19th Party Congress: ringing in Xi Jinping's new age.” China Leadership Monitor 55:1-22. Fierke, K. M. and A. Wiener. 1999. “Constructing Institutional Interests: EU and NATO Enlargement”. Journal of European Public Policy 6(5): 721–742. Finnemore, M. and K. Sikkink. 2001. “Taking Stock: The Constructivist Research Program in International Relations and Comparative Politics.” Annual Review of Political Science 4: 391-416. Foot, Rosemary. 2019. “Remembering the past to secure the present: Versailles legacies in a resurgent China.” International Affairs 95(1): 143–160. Foucault, Michel. 1982. “The Subject and Power.” Critical Inquiry 8(4): 777-795. Fujii, Lee Ann. 2011. Killing Neighbors: Webs of Violence in Rwanda. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Gadamer, Hans-Georg. 1992. “Interview: The 1920s, 1930s and the Present: National Socialism, German History and German Culture.” In Hans-Georg Gadamer on Education, Poetry and History, eds. Dieter Misgeld and Graeme Nicholson. Albany: SUNY, 135–53. Gadamer, Hans-George. 1977. Philosophical Hermeneutics. Berkeley: University of California Press. Gadamer, Hans-Georg. 2004. Truth and Method (J. Weinsheimer and D.G. Marshall, Trans.). New York and London: Continuum. (Original work published in 1960). Gelber, Harry G. 2007. The dragon and the foreign devils: china and the world, 1100 B.C. to the Present. Walker and Company: New York. Gellner, Ernest. 1964. Thought and change. London and Chicago: University of Chicago Press. George, J. and D. Campbell. 1990. “Patterns of Dissent and the Celebration of Difference: Critical Social Theory and International Relations.” International Studies Quarterly 34(3): 269-293. George, Theodore. 2021. “Hermeneutics." In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2021/entries/hermeneutics/. Last updated Winter 2021. Ginsberg, Norton. 1968. “On the Chinese perception of a world order.” In China in Crisis, Vol. 2, China’s policies in Asia and America’s alternatives, ed. Tang Tsou. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 73-92. Global Times. 2022. “Chinese youngsters more confident, objective facing the West, GT survey shows.” https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202210/1277625.shtml. Last updated 21 October, 2022. Grimm, Jacob. 1851, September 1. “On the Origin of Language.” Prussian Academy, Berlin. Grimm, Stephen. 2021. “Understanding." In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2021/entries/understanding. Last updated 6 May 2021. Gunnell, John G. 1969. “Deduction, Explanation, and Social Scientific Inquiry.” The American Political Science Review 63(4): 1233–46. Habermas, Jürgen. 1971. Knowledge and Human Interests. Boston: Beacon. Habermas, Jürgen. 1977. “Discussion.” In Understanding and Social Inquiry, eds. Fred R. Dallmayr and Thomas McCarthy. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 66-72. Habermas, Jürgen. 1984. The Theory of Communicative Action: Vol. 1. Reason and Rationalization of Society (T. McCarthy, Trans.). Boston: Beacon. (Original work published in 1981). Habermas, Jürgen. 1985. The Theory of Communicative Action: Vol. 2. Lifeworld and System: a Critique of Functionalist Reason (Trans. T. McCarthy). Boston: Beacon. (Original work published in 1981). Hadano, Tsukasa. 2021. “China purges school libraries of 'Western veneration’.” Nikkei Asia. https://asia.nikkei.com/Politics/China-purges-school-libraries-of-Western- veneration2. Last updated 18 April 2022. Hall, Jonathan. 1997. Ethnic Identity in Greek Antiquity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Hall, Todd H. 2015. Emotional Diplomacy: Official Emotion on the International Stage. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Hansen-Magnusson, Hannes. 2014. “Memory, trauma and changing international norms: the German Green Party’s struggle with violence and its concern for humanity.” In Memory and Trauma in International Relations: Theories, cases and debates, eds. Erica Resende and Dovile Budryte. Routledge: London and New York, 153-167. Hegel, George W.F. 1991. Elements of the Philosophy of Right (H.B. Nisbet, Trans.). Ed. Allen W. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Heidegger, Martin. 1962. Being and Time (J. Macquarrie and E, Robinson, Trans.). Malden: Blackwell. (Original work published in 1927). Heidegger, Martin. 2008. Ontology- the hermeneutics of facticity (J. van Buren, Trans.). Indiana: Indiana University Press. (Original work published in 1988). Hellman, G. and J. Steffek. 2022. Praxis as a Perspective on International Politics. Bristol: Bristol University Press. Heraclitus, Fragments (Thomas M. Robinson, Trans.). 1987. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. Hess, Christian A. 2010. “Keeping the Past Alive: the Use of History in China’s Foreign Relations.” In Handbook of China’s International Relations, ed. Shaun Breslin. London: Routledge, 47-54. Hollis, M. and S. Smith. 1990. Explaining and understanding international relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Holland, Ben. 2017. “The Perpetual Peace Puzzle: Kant on persons and states.” Philosophy & Social Criticism 43(6): 599–620. Hui, Lu. 2017. “Commentary: Milestone congress points to new era for China, the world.” Xinhua. http://www.xinhuanet.com//english/2017-10/24/ c_136702090.htm. Latest update 24 October 2017. Hu, Jintao. 2012, November 8. hu jintao zai zhongguo gongchandang di shiba ci quanguo daibiao dahui shang de baogao (胡錦濤在中國共產黨第十八次全國 代表大會上的報告/Hu Jintao’s report for the 18th Party Congress of the Communist Party of China). http://theory.people.com.cn/BIG5/n/2013/0403/ c359820-21013407-3.html. Hurrell, Andrew. 2020. “Why International Relations and Area Studies Need Each Other.” St Antony’s International Review 16(1): 191-196. Hutchens, Benjamin C. 2004. Levinas: A guide for the perplexed. New York and London: Continuum. Hwang, Kwang-Kuo. 1997. “Guanxi and Mientze: Conflict Resolution in Chinese Society.” Intercultural Communication Studies 7(1): 17-38. Hyginus. 1960. Fabulae (M. Grant, Trans.). In The Myths of Hyginus, ed. Mary Grant. Lawrence: University of Kansas Publications in Humanistic Studies. Hymans, Jacques E.C. 2010. "The arrival of psychological constructivism.” International Theory 2(3): 461–467. Iser, Mattias. 2019. “Recognition.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https:// plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2019/entries/recognition. Last updated 5 June 2019. Jackson, I. and S. Du. 2022. “The Impact of History Textbooks on Young Chinese People’s Understanding of the Past: A Social Media Analysis.” Journal of Current Chinese Affairs 51(2): 194–218. Jackson, Patrick T. 2011. The Conduct of Inquiry in International Relations: Philosophy of Science and Its Implications for the Study of World Politics. New York and London: Routledge. Kaiman, Jonathan. 2013. “China to downgrade English section of college admissions test.” The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/oct/22/china- english-college-test-gaokao. Latest update 22 October 2013. Kates, George N. 1967. The Years that were Fat. Cambridge, M.A.: M.I.T Press. (Original work published in 1952). Keohane, Robert O. 1988. “International Institutions: Two Approaches." International studies quarterly 32(4): 379–396. Kim, Samuel S. 1979. China, the United Nations, and world order. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Princeton. King, G., R.O. Keohane, and S. Verba. 1994. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Kirby, William C. 2017. "When Did China Become China? Thoughts on the Twentieth Century". In The Teleology of the Modern Nation-State: Japan and China, ed. Joshua A. Fogel. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 105-114. Kornprobst, Markus. 2009. "International Relations as Rhetorical Discipline: Toward (Re-) Newing Horizons.” International Studies Review 11(1): 87–108. Koschut, S., T. H. Hall, R. Wolf, T. Solomon, E. Hutchison and R. Bleiker. 2017. “Discourse and Emotions in International Relations.” International Studies Review 19(3): 481–508. Kratochwil, Friedrich. 2008. “Constructivism: What it is (not) and how it matters.” In Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences: A Pluralist Perspective, eds. Donatella Della Porta and Michael Keating. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 80-98. Kratochwil, Friedrich. 2018. Praxis. On Acting and Knowing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Kratochwil, F. and J.G. Ruggie. 1986. “A State of the Art on an Art of the State.” International Organization 40(4): 753-775. Kristensson Uggla, Bengt. 2010. Ricoeur, Hermeneutics and Globalization. London and New York: Continuum. Kurowska, Xymena. 2020. “Interpretive Scholarship in Contemporary International Relations.” Teoria Polityki 4: 93-107. Lai, Ming-yan. 2008. Nativism and Modernity: Cultural Contestations in China and Taiwan under Global Capitalism. Albany: State University of New York Press. Lake, David A. 2013. “Theory is dead, long live theory: The end of the Great Debates and the rise of eclecticism in International Relations.” European Journal of International Relations 19(3): 567–587. Lawn, C. and N. Keane. 2011. The Gadamer Dictionary. London: A&C Black. Lee, Ching-kuan. 2022. “Global China at 20: Why, How and So What?” The China Quarterly 250: 313-331. Levinas, Emmanuel. 1979. Totality and Infinity: An Essay on Exteriority (A. Lingis, Trans.). Hague, Boston and London: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. Lew, Linda. 2020. “Language rules for Inner Mongolia another step to erode ethnic groups in China.” South China Morning Post. https://www.scmp.com/news/ china/politics/article/3101186/language-rules-inner-mongolia-another-step- erode-ethnic-groups. Latest update 13 September 2020. Li, Yuan. 2021. “‘Reversing gears’: China increasingly rejects English, and the world.” The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/09/09/business/china- english.html. Latest update 21 October 2021. Liang, Shuming. 2009. zhongguoren: lixing zaoqi de renxing (中国人:理性早启的人 性/ Chinese people: human nature’s early rationality) . Beijing: Fenghuang Chubanshe Tijituan. Liberty Times, 2021. “zhongguoren bu chi zhe yi tao” yang jiechi qiang mei bei peng cheng jinju huacheng shangpin taobao chushou (「中國人不吃這一套」楊潔 篪嗆美被捧成金句 化成商品淘寶出售/“Chinese people will not accept this” Yang Jiechi’s rebute towards America becomes a golden sentence, gets transformed into product sold on Taobao). https://ec.ltn.com.tw/article/ breakingnews/3473890. Last update 21 March 2021. Liff, A. and D. Lin. 2022. “The “One China” Framework at 50 (1972–2022): The Myth of “Consensus” and Its Evolving Policy Significance." The China Quarterly 252: 977-1000. Linklater, Andrew. 1998. The Transformation of Political Community. Oxford and Cambridge: Polity Press. Liu, Bo. 2008. yuan - renlei wenming zhonghua yuanliukao (源-人类文明中华源流考/ Origin-Authenticating the Source of Human Civilisation) Changsha: Hunan Renmin. Liu, J. and H. Tao. 2016. “Chinese language in a global context.” In The Routledge Encyclopedia of the Chinese Language, eds. Chan Sin-Wai, James William Minett and Florence Li Wing Yee. Oxford: Routledge, 119-136. Liu, Lydia H. 2004. The clash of empires: the invention of china in modern world making. London and Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Lynch, Cecilia. 1999. Beyond Appeasement: Interpreting Interwar Peace Movements in World Politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Maizland, Lindsay. 2022. “China’s Repression of Uyghurs in Xinjiang.” Council on Foreign Relations. https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/china-xinjiang-uyghurs- muslims-repression-genocide-human-rights#chapter-title-0-1. Latest update 22 September 2022. Mancall, Mark. 1968. “The Ch’ing Tribute system: an interpretive essay.” In The Chinese world order : Traditional China’s Foreign Relations, ed. John Fairbank. Harvard: Harvard University Press, 63-89. Mao, Zedong. 1949, 21 September. zhongguo renmin zhanqilai le (中國人民站起來了/ The Chinese people have stood up. zhongguo yu shijie, http:// www.xiachao.org.tw/xiachao/7-1.html. Retrieved 21 April 2023. March, J.G. and J.P. Olsen. 1989. Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics. New York: Free Press. March, J.G. and J.P. Olsen. 1998. “The Institutional Dynamics of International Political Orders.” International Organization 52(4): 943-69. McCourt, David M. 2012a. “Phronesis and Foreign Policy in Theory and Practice.” In E-International Relations. https://www.e-ir.info/2012/11/23/phronesis-and- foreign-policy-in-theory-and-practice/#_edn3. Latest update 23 November 2012. McCourt, David M. 2012b. “What’s At Stake in the Historical Turn? Theory, Practice, and Phronēsis in International Relations.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 41(1): 23-42. Mead, Walter Russell. 2020. “China Is the Real Sick Man of Asia.” The Wall Street Journal. https://www.wsj.com/articles/china-is-the-real-sick-man-of- asia-11580773677. Last updated 3 February 2020. Mearsheimer, J.J. and S.M. Walt. 2013. “Leaving theory behind: Why simplistic hypothesis testing is bad for International Relations.” European Journal of International Relations 19(3):427–457. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 1964. “Eye and Mind.” (C. Dallery, Trans.). In The Primacy of Perception – And Other Essays on Phenomenological Psychology, the Philosophy of Art, History and Politics, ed. John Wild. Illinois: Northwestern University Press, 159-190. Mitter, Rana. 2004. A bitter revolution: China’s struggle with the modern world. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Mitter, R. and E. Johnson. 2021. “What the West Gets Wrong About China.” Harvard Business Review. Online, retrieved from https://hbr.org/2021/05/what-the-west- gets-wrong-about-china. Latest update May/June 2021. Morgenthau, Hans J. 1946. Scientific Man vs. Power Politics. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Murphy, David. 2014. “Huayuquan 话语权: Speak and be heard” In Shared Destiny, eds Geremie R Barmé, Linda Jaivin and Jeremy Goldkorn Canberra: ANU Press, 54-56. Neufeld, Mark. 1993. “Interpretation and the 'Science' of International Relations.” Review of International Studies 19(1): 39-61. Nikkei Asia. 2021. “How it happened: Transcript of the US-China opening remarks in Alaska.” https://asia.nikkei.com/Politics/International-relations/US-China- tensions/How-it-happened-Transcript-of-the-US-China-opening-remarks-in- Alaska. Latest update 19 March 2021. Ng, On-cho. 2021. “Onto-Generative Hermeneutics: Cheng Chung-Ying’s Philosophy of Understanding and Truth.” In Dao Companion to Contemporary Confucian Philosophy, ed. David Elstein. New York: Springer, 323-344. O’Barr, William M. 1978. Review of the book: Politics, Language, and Thought: The Somali Experience, by D. D. Laitin. American Ethnologist 5(4): 797-799. Odysseos, Louiza. 2007. The subject of Coexistence: Otherness in International Relations. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Odysseos, Louiza. 2010. “Deconstructing the modern subject - method and possibility in Martin Heidegger’s hermeneutics of facticity.” In International Relations Theory and Philosophy - Interpretive Dialogues, eds. Cerwyn Moore and Chris Farrands. London and New York: Routledge, 20-32. Online Etymology Dictionary. 2021b. “War.” In https://www.etymonline.com/word/ war#etymonline_v_44585. Latest update 9 March 2021. Onuf, Nicholas. 2003. “Parsing personal identity: Self, other, agent.” In Language, Agency and Politics in a Constructed World, ed. Francois Debrix. New York: M.E. Sharpe, 26-49. Ortega y Gasset, José. 1965. History as a System and other essays toward a philosophy of history. New York: Norton and Company. (Original work published in 1941). Ostrom, Elinor. 1998. “A Behavioural Approach to Rational Choice Theory of Collective Action.” American Political Science Review 92(1): 1-22. Ortega y Gasset, José. 1967. The Origin of Philosophy. New York: Norton. Palmer, Richard E. 1969. Hermeneutics. Evanston: Northwestern University Press. Pan, Wenguo. 2008. weiji xia de zhongwen (危机下的中文/Chinese in Crisis). Shenyang: Liaoning Renmin Chubanshe. Penny, Benjamin. 2020. “Evil Cults and Holy Writ.” In China Dreams, eds. Jane Golley, Linda Jaivin, Ben Hillman and Sharon Strange. Canberra: ANU Press, 79-84. Perdue, Peter. 1998. “Boundaries, maps and movement: Chinese, Russian, and Mongolian empires in early modern Central Eurasia.” International Historical Review 20(2): 263-86. Permanent Court of Arbitration. 2016. “The South China Sea Arbitration (The Republic of Philippines v. The People's Republic of China).” https://pca-cpa.org/en/cases/ 7. Pinker, Steven. 2007. The Stuff of Human Thought. New York: Viking. Pinker, Steven. 2013. Language, Cognition, and Human Nature: Selected Articles. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Popper, Karl. 2002. The Poverty of Historicism. London and New York: Routledge. (Original work published in 1957). Privette, G., K.K. Hwang, and C.M. Bundrick. 1997. "Cross-Cultural Measurement of Experience: Taiwanese and Americans’ Peak Performance, Peak Experience, Misery, Failure, Sport, and Average Events.” Perceptual and Motor Skills 84(3): 1459-1482. Qin, Gang. 2023, 7 March. “Foreign Minister Qin Gang Meets the Press.” Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People’s Republic of China. https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/ mfa_eng/zxxx_662805/202303/t20230307_11037190.html. Qin, Yaqing. 2006. “guoji guanxi lilun zhongguo xuepai shengcheng de keneng he biran” (国际关系理论中国学派生成的可能和必然/ The Possibility and Inevitability of the Formation of the Chinese School of International Relations Theory). shijie jingji yu zhengzhi 2006(3): 7-13. Qin, Yaqin. 2018. A Relational Theory of World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Qiu, Jane. 2016. “How China is Rewriting the Book on Human Origins.” Scientific American. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/how-china-is-rewriting- the-book-on-human-origins/ Latest update 13 July 2016. Quinn, Karl. 2022. “‘If a strange number calls, don’t pick up’: Comic’s China backlash.” The Sydney Morning Herald. https://www.smh.com.au/culture/ comedy/if-a-strange-number-calls-don-t-pick-up-comic-s-china- backlash-20221027-p5btc4.html. Last updated 27 October, 2022. Qiushi. 2013. “qiushi: zhongguo meng wei zhongguo tese shehuizhuyi zhuru xin nengliang” (秋石:中国梦为中国特色社会主义注入新能量/Qiu Shi: The Chinese Dream injects new energy into socialism with Chinese characteristics). http://theory.people.com.cn/n/2013/0501/c40531-21333350.html. Last updated 1 May 2013. Rathbun, Brian C. 2015. “Chinese Attitudes toward Americans and Themselves: Is there a Relationship?” In Perception and Misperception in American and Chinese Views of the Other, eds. Alastiar Iain Johnston and Mingming Shen. Washing: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 9-22. Reischauer, Edwin O. “The Sinic World in Perspective.” Foreign Affairs 52(2): 341-348. Ren, Qi. 2023. “Xi’s vision of shared future taking shape.” China Daily. Last updated 6 January 2023. Reus Smit, Chris. 2013. “Beyond Metatheory?” Journal of International Relations 19(3): 589-608. Ricoeur, Paul. 1978a. “Existence and Hermeneutics.” In The Philosophy of Paul Ricoeur: An Anthology of His Work, eds. Charles E. Reagan and David Stewart. Boston: Beacon Press, 97-108. Ricoeur, Paul. 1978b. “Explanation and Understanding.” In The Philosophy of Paul Ricoeur: An Anthology of His Work, eds. Charles E. Reagan and David Stewart. Boston: Beacon Press, 149-166. Risse, Thomas. 2000. “‘Let’s Argue!” Communicative Action in World Politics’.” International Organization 54: 1-39. Ruggie, John G. 1998. “What Makes the World Hang Together? Neo-Utilitarianism and the Social Constructivist Challenge.” International Organization 52(4): 855-885. Safeguard Defenders. 2022. “230,000 Chinese "persuaded to return" from abroad, China to establish Extraterritoriality.” https://safeguarddefenders.com/en/ blog/230000-policing-expands. Last updated 12 Sep, 2022. sangfu sizhi (喪服四制/Four Principles Underlying the Dress of Mourning). In liji (禮 記/Book of Rites). https://ctext.org/liji/sang-fu-si-zhi/zh. Schaeffer, John D. 1981. “Vico’s Rhetorical Model of the Mind: ‘Sensus Communis’ in the ‘De Nostri Temporis Studiorum Ratione’.” Philosophy & Rhetoric 14(3): 152–67. Schaeffer, John D. 1990. Sensus Communis: Vico, Rhetoric, and the Limits of Relativism. Durham: Duke University Press. Schwartz, Benjamin I. 1968. “The Chinese perception of world order, past and presents.” In The Chinese world order : Traditional China’s Foreign Relations, ed. John Fairbank. Harvard: Harvard University Press, 276-288. Searle, John. 1995. The Construction of Social Reality. London: Penguin. Seckinelgin, Hakan. 2006. The Environment and International Politics. International Fisheries, Heidegger and Social Method. London and New York: Routledge. Seton-Watson, Hugh. 1977. Nations and States: An enquiry into the origins of nations and the politics of nationalism. Yorkshire: Methuen Publishing. Shapcott, Richard. 1994. “Conversation and Coexistence: Gadamer and the Interpretation of International Society.” Millennium 23(1): 57-83. Shapcott, Richard. 2001. Justice, Community and Dialogue in International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Sherratt, Yvonne. 2006. Continental philosophy of social science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Shih, Chiy-yu. 1993. China’s Just World: the Morality of Chinese Foreign Policy. Boulder and London: Lynne Reinner Publishers. Shih, Chih-Yu. 2012. Civilisation, Nation and Modernity in East Asia. London and New York: Routledge. Socktsang, Lobe. 2020. “Classroom Instruction Switch From Tibetan to Chinese in Ngaba Sparks Worry, Anger.” Radio Free Asia. https://www.rfa.org/english/ news/tibet/classroom-04092020184114.html. Last updated 9 April 2020. Sokō, Yamaga. Chucho Jijitsu (中朝事實). https://miko.org/~uraki/kuon/furu/text/ chuuchou/chuuchoujijitu.htm. Retrieved 21 April 2023. Steinberger, Peter. J. 1977. “Hegel as a Social Scientist." The American Political Science Review 71(1): 95–110. Sun, Yat-sen. 1912. “ye mingtai zu ling wen” (謁明太祖陵文/Setting the Tone for the Great Revival of the China Race). China Heritage. https://chinaheritage.net/ journal/commemorating-a-different-centenary-dai-qing-on-the-1911-revolution/ Retrieved 21 April 2023. Sutter, Robert G. 2012. Chinese Foreign Relations. Third edition. Washington D.C.: Rowman & Littlefield. Taylor, Charles. 1994. “The Politics of Recognition.” In Multiculturalism: Examining the Politics of Recognition, ed. Amy Gutman. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 25-73. Teichert, Dieter. 2020. “Hermeneutics: Polity, Politics, and Political Theory in Gadamer’s Philosophical Hermeneutics.” Teoria Polityki 4: 123-138. Teit, James A. 1917. “Kaska Tales.” The Journal of American Folklore 30(118): 427– 73. Tilly, Charles. 1975. “Reflections on the history of European state-making.” InThe Formation of National States in Western Europe, ed. Charles Tilly. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 3–89. Tinning, Richard. 1992. “Reading Action Research: Notes on Knowledge and Human Interests.” Quest 44(1): 1-14. Todorov, Tzvetan. 1984. The conquest of America : the question of the other (R. Howard, Trans.). New York: Harper & Row. Todorov, Tzvetan. 2010. Memory as a remedy for Evil (G. Walker, Trans.). London, New York and Calcutta: Seagull Books. Tsang, Steve. 2020. “Party-state Realism: A Framework for Understanding China’s Approach to Foreign Policy.” Journal of Contemporary China 29(122): 304-318. Treaty of Tientsin. 1858, June 28. https://web.archive.org/web/20160305080501/http:// chinaforeignrelations.net/node/144. Tucker, William T. 1965. “Max Weber's Verstehen.” Sociological Quarterly 6: 157-164. Van Der Ree, Gerard. 2015. “Being-in-the-world of the international.” Review of International Studies 41(4): 781-798. Väyrynen, Tarja. 2005. “Gadamer and International Conflict Resolution.” Journal of Peace Research 42(3): 347-355. Wang, C. Y., and Z. Chen. 2023. “From ‘motherland’ to ‘daddy state’: A genealogical analysis of the gender undertone in China's nationalist discourses.” Nations and Nationalism 29(2): 751– 767. Wang, Fei-ling. 2017. The China Order: Centralia, World Empire, and the nature of Chinese Power. Albany: SUNY. Wang, Gungwu. 1972. “Chinese Society and Chinese Foreign Policy." International Affairs 48(4): 616–624. Wang, Y. and W. Sun. 2008. “huayi biantai yu qingdai shiliao” (《华夷变态》与清代 史料/ Kai Hentai and the Historical Materials of the Qing Dynasty. Journal of Zhejiang University 38(1): 141-147. Wang, Yi. 2016, May 31. Work Together to Create a Community of Shared Future for Mankind. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People’s Republic of China. www.fmprc.gov. cn/mfa_eng/zxxx_662805/t1369269.shtml. Wendt, Alexander. 1992. “Anarchy is what states make of it: The social construction of power politics.” International Organization 46: 391-425. Wendt, Alexander. 1995. “Constructing International Politics.” International Security 20(1): 71-81. Wendt, Alexander. 1998. “On Constitution and Causation in International Relations.” Review of International Studies 24: 101-117. Wendt, Alexander. 1999. Social Theory of International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Wild, John. 1979. “Introduction.” In Totality and Infinity: An Essay on Exteriority (A. Lingis, Trans.), Emmanuel Levinas. Hague, Boston and London: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. Williamson, Robert W. 1933. Religious and Cosmic Beliefs of Central Polynesia Vol. I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Winch, Peter. 2008. The Idea of a Social Science and its Relation to Philosophy. London and New York: Routledge. (Original work published in 1958). Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1922. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. London: Teubner and Co. Woo, Stu. 2021. “China makes sure everyone writes Taiwan’s name just so – even a Colorado high school.” Wall Street Journal. https://www.wsj.com/articles/china- makes-sure-everyone-writes-taiwans-name-just-soeven-a-colorado-high- school-1163130438. Latest update 10 September, 2021. Wu, Guanjun. 2014. Great Dragon Fantasy: A Lacanian Analysis Of Contemporary Chinese Thought. Singapore: World Scientific. Wu, Huizhong. 2020. “In echo of Mao era, China's schools in book-cleansing drive.” Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-books-insight- idUSKBN24A1R5. Last updated 9 July 2020. Xi, Jinping. 2014, August 19. zai quanguo xuanchuan sixiang gongzuo huiyi shang de jianghua (在全国宣传思想工作会议上的讲话/Speech at National Conference on Propaganda and Thought Works). China Copyright and Media. https:// chinacopyrightandmedia.wordpress.com/2013/11/12/xi-jinpings-19-august- speech-revealed-translation/. Xi, Jinping. 2019, October 1. zai qingzhu zhonghua renmin gongheguo he guochengli 70 zhounian dahui shang de jianghua (在庆祝中华人民共和国成立70周年大 会上的讲话/Speech celebrating the 70th anniversary of the founding of the People’s Republic of China). Xinhua. http://www.xinhuanet.com/politics/ 2019-10/01/c_1125065799.htm/. Xi, Jinping. 2021a, January 27. Special Address by Chinese President H.E. Xi Jinping at the World Economic Forum Virtual Event of the Davos Agenda. http:// manchester.china-consulate.gov.cn/eng/xwdt/202101/t20210127_3436550.htm. Xi, Jinping. 2021b, July 1. zai qingzhu zhongguo gongchandang chengli 100 zhounian dahui shang de jianghua (在庆祝中国共产党成立100周年大会上的讲话/in celebration of the 100 year anniversary of the Chinese Communist Party). http:// www.gov.cn/xinwen/2021-07/01/content_5621847.htm. Xi, Jinping. 2021c, December 14. Speech at the opening ceremony of the 11th National Congress of China Federation of Literary and Art Circles and the 10th National Congress of China Writers Association. http://www.china.org.cn/ governanceofchina/node_8031926.html. Xi, Jinping. 2022a, October 16. gao ju zhongguo tese shehuizhuyi weida qizhi wei quanmian jianshe shehuizhuyi xiandaihua guojia er tuanjie fendou - zai zhongguo gongchandang di ershi ci quanguo daibiao dahui shang de baogao (高举中国特色社会主义伟大旗帜为全面建设社会主义现代化国家而团结奋 斗——在中国共产党第二十次全国代表大会上的报告/Hold High the Great Banner of Socialism with Chinese Characteristics and Strive in Unity to Build a Modern Socialist Country in All Respects)”. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People’s Republic of China. https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/eng/ zxxx_662805/202210/t20221025_10791908.html. Xi, Jinping. 2022b, November 14. President Xi Jinping Meets with U.S. President Joe Biden in Bali. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People’s Republic of China. https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/mfa_eng/zxxx_662805/202211/ t20221114_10974686.html. Xi, Jinping. 2023, March 13. zai di shisi jie quanguo renmin daibiao dahui di yi ci huiyi Shang de jianghua (在第十四屆全國人民代表大會第一次會議上的講 話/ Speech at the first session of the 14th national people’s congress). https:// www.mct.gov.cngtbindex.jspurl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.mct.gov.cn%2Fpreview%2Fspecial%2F2023lh%2F9690%2F202303%2Ft20230314_940529.htm. Xinhua. 2023. “(lianghui shouquan fabu) xi jinping zai kanwang canjia zhengxie huiyi de minjian gongshang lianjie weiyuan shi qiangdiao zhengque yindao minying jingji jiankang fazhan gaozhiliang fazhan wang huning cai qi ding xuexiang canjia kanwang he taolun ((两会受权发布)习近平在看望参加政协会议的民 建工商联界委员时强调 正确引导民营经济健康发展高质量发展 王沪宁蔡 奇丁薛祥参加看望和讨论 / (Published under the authority of the Two Sessions) When Xi Jinping visited the members of the Federation of Democratic Construction Industry and Commerce who participated in the CPPCC meeting, he emphasized that the private economy should be correctly guided to develop in a healthy and high-quality manner. Wang Huning, Cai Qiding, Ding Xuexiang and Xue Xiang participated in the visit and discussion). http://www.news.cn/ politics/leaders/2023-03/06/c_1129417096.htm. Last updated 6 March 2023. Yang, Lien-sheng. 1968. “Historical notes on the Chinese world order.” In The Chinese world order : Traditional China’s Foreign Relations, ed. John Fairbank. Harvard: Harvard University Press, 20-33. Yang, Ping. 2023. “The Ukraine Crisis and the Building of a New International System.” Wenhua Zongheng 1(1): 10-16. Yao, Zhongqiu. 2023. “Five Centuries of Global Transformation: A Chinese Perspective.” Wenhua Zongheng 1(1): 17-39. Ye, Zhanhang. 2023. “Chinese Professor Suspended For Racist, Homophobic Speech.” Sixth Tone. https://www.sixthtone.com/news/1012321. Latest update 20 February 2023. Yu, Jian. 2004. shi ge zhi hua de ying yu ruan - shi ge yanjiu caoan: guanyu dangdai shige de lianglei yuyan xiangdu (诗歌之舌的硬与软——诗歌研究草案:关 于当 代诗歌的两类语言向度/The Hard and Soft of the Tongue of Poetry – A Draft of Poetry Study: On Two Different Directionsin the Language of Contemporary Poetry). In jujue yinyu: zongpi shouji, pinglun, fangtan (拒绝隐喻: 棕皮手记,评论,访谈/Refusal of Metaphor: Brown Notebook, Criticism, and Interviews), ed. Yu Jian. Kunming: Yunnan Renmin Chubanshe, 137–51. Yu, Verna. 2023. “History revisited: what the isolationist Qing dynasty tells us about Xi Jinping’s China.” https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/jan/16/what-the- isolationist-qing-dynasty-tells-us-about-xi-jinpings-china. Latest update 16 January 2023. Zakaria, Fareed. 2023. “The dollar is our superpower, and Russia and China are threatening it.”The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/ 2023/03/24/us-dollar-strength-russia-china/ Latest update 24 March 2023. Zhao, Tingyang. 2006. “Rethinking Empire from a Chinese Concept ‘All-under- Heaven’ (Tian-xia).” Social Identities 12(1): 29-41. Zhao, Tingyang. 2009. “A Political World Philosophy in terms of All-under-heaven (Tian-xia).” Diogenes 221:5-18. Zhao, Tingyang. 2021. All under Heaven: The Tianxia System for a Possible World Order. Berkeley: University of California Press. (Original work published in 2005). Zheng, Dahua. 2019. “Modern Chinese nationalism and the awakening of self- consciousness of the Chinese Nation.” International Journal of Anthropology and Ethnology 3(11): 1-25. Zheng, William. 2023. “China faces growing threats from ‘external forces’, former spy chief warns.” South China Morning Post. https://www.scmp.com/news/china/ politics/article/3207148/china-faces-growing-threats-external-forces-former- spy-chief-warns. Last updated 17 January 2023. Zhou, Liangxiao. 1999. huangdi yu huangquan (皇帝与皇权/Emperor and Imperial Power). Shanghai: Guji. Zhu, Yong. 2009. Diguo Chuangshang (帝国创伤/Imperial Wounds). Beijing: Zhongguo Wenlian Chubanshe. Zimmer, Oliver. 2011. “Coping with deviance: Swiss nationhood in the long nineteenth century.” Nations and Nationalism 17(4): 756-774. zongjiao shiwu tiaoli (宗教事務條例/ religious affairs clauses), §686, 2017, http:// big5.www.gov.cn/gate/big5/www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2017-09/07/ content_5223282.htm. | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/87951 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 本論文使用漢斯‧格奧爾格‧伽達默爾(Hans-Georg Gadamer)成立的哲學詮釋學的理論與方法,以新的概念應用於國際關係理論。本文將伽達默爾的視域融合(fusion of horizons)概念,作為人類理解世界與他者的方法。並以哲學詮釋學概念作為框架,建立激進的建構主義(constructivist)與複雜的理論方法,為國際互動的規範性問題提供了答案。具體而言,本文的理論框架把國際互動視為對話者們在敘事結構中的交會,透過這種交會互動,體現出自我與他者(Self-Other)的關係。語言不僅有助於了解這個世界的形塑過程,也是人們在這個世界中因互相瞭解產生共同感(sensus communi)時傳達意義方法,而共同感獲得能動性後,即能化身為對話者,本文稱之為民族精神(Volksgeists)。由於個人對世界的直接詮釋會不停重塑人們對於世界的理解,因此民族精神的互動會不斷地塑造國際體系。為了辯證由哲學詮釋學框架產生的理論知識,本文進行認識論的探究,論證詮釋學方法在回應社會科學中綜合問題 (synthetic questions)的優勢。最後,本文運用哲學詮釋學的理論框架,分析中國與國際環境的詮釋互動,同時地對中國在國際舞台上的意圖與意向性進行最新的評估。在本文對於中國的分析中,顯現了強烈的領土收復主義(irredentist)的情緒,驅動了當代中國的民族精神,導致中國與國際環境可能發生衝突,此結論呼應了伽達默爾的先見與傳統概念。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | This thesis contributes to international relations theory by provision of a novel conceptualisation of interaction in the international, formulated through adaptation of the theory and method of Hans-Georg Gadamer’s philosophical hermeneutics. By utilising interpretation and Gadamer’s fusion of horizons as the human means of understanding the world and the Other, a radical constructivist and sophisticated theoretical approach is built through a framework of philosophical hermeneutical concepts, which together provide answers to normative questions of interaction in the international. Specifically, the framework construes international engagement as meetings of interlocutors in structures of discourse, through which Self-Other relationships manifest. Language is not only the formation of understanding about the world, but is also the means of transmission of meaning between lifeworlds constructed of shared meaning between individuals (sensus communi), which are given agency and manifestation as interlocutors, termed here as Volksgeists. Meetings of Volksgeists continually shape the international system as the temporal immediacy of interpretation constantly redefines understanding of the world for individuals. In order to validate the knowledge attained through the philosophical hermeneutical framework, epistemological reasoning is conducted to demonstrate the advantages of hermeneutical methods in response of synthetic questions in social science. Finally, this thesis operationalises the framework by conducting an analysis of China and its interpretative engagement with the international, simultaneously providing an up-to-date assessment of Chinese intention and intentionality towards the international arena. The analysis of China demonstrates a strong irredentist sentiment formulated on Gadamerian pre-understanding and tradition which drives the contemporary Chinese Volksgeist, leading to conflict with the international. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2023-07-31T16:30:12Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2023-07-31T16:30:12Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | Tables.............................................................................................................1
I. Introduction................................................................................................3 II. Philosophical Hermeneutics as Method for Understanding the Social in International Relations ................................................................................14 2.1. Philosophical Hermeneutics and International Relations Literature 16 2.2. The Advantages of Philosophical Hermeneutics as Method.............21 2.3. The Reflexive Experience of the International Relations Scholar Engaging in Hermeneutic Methods .........................................................39 III. Construction of a Philosophical Hermeneutical Framework for International Relations ................................................................................46 3.1 Philosophical Hermeneutical Theory.................................................47 3.2. Language as Constitutive of the Social.............................................52 3.3. Tradition and Context .......................................................................58 3.4. Formation of Shared Social Identity through Understanding, Leading to Agency .................................................................................................64 3.5. Formation of the Volksgeist ..............................................................77 3.6. Entering into Dialogue with the Other..............................................85 3.6.1. Globalisation .........................................................................92 3.7. Conflict with the Other .....................................................................96 3.7.1. Power...................................................................................104 3.8. The Temporal Immediacy of Interpretation ....................................108 IV. Chinese Intentionality towards the International .................................111 4.1. The Self and the Other in Chinese Experience ...............................119 4.2. An Irredentist Volksgeist.................................................................138 4.3. Language as Constitutive of Chineseness.......................................158 4.4. China and the International.............................................................162 V. Conclusion ............................................................................................170 Bibliography ..............................................................................................174 | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.title | 推進國際關係理論的哲學詮釋學框架 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Advancing a Philosophical Hermeneutical Framework for International Relations Theory | en |
dc.type | Thesis | - |
dc.date.schoolyear | 111-2 | - |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 郭銘傑;黃長玲;袁易 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Jason M. Kuo;Chang-Ling Huang;I Yuan | en |
dc.subject.keyword | 哲學詮釋學,共同感,民族精神,詮釋國際關係理論, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | philosophical hermeneutics,sensus communis,Volksgeist,interpretative international relations theory, | en |
dc.relation.page | 201 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202300960 | - |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | - |
dc.date.accepted | 2023-06-16 | - |
dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | - |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 政治學系 | - |
顯示於系所單位: | 政治學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-111-2.pdf | 2.14 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。