Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 生物資源暨農學院
  3. 森林環境暨資源學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/8792
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor袁孝維(Hsiao-wei Yuan)
dc.contributor.authorYing-Lan Chenen
dc.contributor.author陳映嵐zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-20T20:01:24Z-
dc.date.available2012-08-20
dc.date.available2021-05-20T20:01:24Z-
dc.date.copyright2011-08-20
dc.date.issued2010
dc.date.submitted2011-08-17
dc.identifier.citationAntonov, A. and D. Atanasova. 2003. Re-use of old nests versus the construction of new ones in the Magpie Pica pica in the city of Sofia (Bulgaria). Acta Ornithologica 38:1-4.
Barclay, R. M. R. 1988. Variation in the cost, benefits, and frequency of nest reuse by Barn Swallows(Hirindo rustica). Auk 105:53-60.
Bart, J. and A. Tornes. 1989. Importance of monogamous male birds in determining reproductive success - evidence for House Wrens and a review of male-removal studies. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 24:109-116.
Block, W. M. and L. A. Brennan. 1993. The habitat concept in ornithology. current ornithology 11:35-91.
Brawn, J. D. and R. P. Balda. 1988. Population biology of cavity nesters in northern Arizona - do nest sites limit breeding densities. Condor 90:61-71.
Brown, C. R. and M. B. Brown. 1986. Ectoparasotism as a cost of coloniality in Cliff Swallows(Hirundo pyrrhonota). Ecology 67:1206-1218.
Burger, J. 1987. Physical and Social Determinats of Nest-Site Selection in Piping Plover in New Jersey. The Condor 89:9.
Cavitt, J. F., A. T. Pearse, and T. A. Miller. 1999. Brown Thrasher nest reuse: a time saving resource, protection from search-strategy predators, or cues for nest-site selection? Condor 101:859-862.
Clark, L. and J. R. Mason. 1985. Use of nest material as insecticidal and anti-pathogenic agents by the European Starling. Oecologia 67:169-176.
Clark, W. R., R. A. Schmitz, and T. R. Bogenschutz. 1999. Site selection and nest success of ring-necked pheasants as a function of location in Iowa landscapes. Journal of Wildlife Management 63:976-989.
Collias, N. E. and E. C. Collias. 1971. Some behavioral energetics in the village weaverbird .I. Comparison of colonies from two Subspecies in nature. Auk 88:124-143.
Collias, N. E. and E. C. Collias. 1984. Nest building and bird behavior. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.
Conrad, K. F. and R. J. Robertson. 1993. Clutch size in Eastern Phoebes(Sayornis phoebe).1.the cost of nest-building. Canadian Journal of Zoology-Revue Canadienne De Zoologie 71:1003-1007.
Crook, J. R. and W. M. Shields. 1987. Non-parental nest attendance in the Barn Swallow (Hirundo, rustica) - helping or harassment. Animal Behaviour 35:991-1001.
Curson, D. R., C. B. Goguen, and N. E. Mathews. 1996. Nest-site reuse in the Western Wood-pewee. Wilson Bulletin 108:378-380.
Danchin, E. and R. H. Wagner. 1997. The evolution of coloniality: the emergence of new perspectives. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 12:342-347.
Ellison, K. S. 2008. Nest reuse by Vermilion Flycatchers in Texas. Wilson Journal of Ornithology 120:339-344.
Emlen, J. T. 1986. Responses of breeding Cliff Swallows to nidicolous parasite infestations. Condor 88:110-111.
Emlen, S. T., J. M. Emlen, and S. A. Levin. 1986. Sex-ratio selection in species with helpers-at-the nest. American Naturalist 127:1-8.
Erckmann, W. J., L. D. Beletsky, G. H. Orians, T. Johnsen, S. Sharbaugh, and C. Dantonio. 1990. Old nests as cues for nest-site selection: an experiment test with Red-winged Blackbirds. Condor 92:113-117.
Fontaine, J. J. and T. E. Martin. 2006. Habitat selection responses of parents to offspring predation risk: An experimental test. American Naturalist 168:811-818.
Fry, C., K. Fry, and A. Harris. 1992. Kingfishers, Bee-eaters, & Rollers: a Handbook. Princeton University.
Gauthier, M. and D. W. Thomas. 1993. Relative success of 2nd nesting attempts by the Cliff Swallow (Hirundo-pyrhonotta) in Sherbrooke (Quebec). Canadian Journal of Zoology-Revue Canadienne De Zoologie 71:1055-1059.
Gergely, Z., L. A. Meszaros, J. Szabad, and T. Szekely. 2009. Old nests are cues for suitable breeding sites in the Eurasian penduline tit Remiz pendulinus. Journal of Avian Biology 40:2-6.
Hauber, M. E. 2002. Is reduced clutch size a cost of parental care in Eastern Phoebes (Sayornis phoebe)? Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 51:503-509.
Heneberg, P. and K. Simecek. 2004. Nesting of European Bee-eaters (Merops apiaster) in Central Europe depends on the soil characteristics of nest sites. Biologia 59:205-211.
Johnson, L. S. 1996. Removal of old nest material from the nesting sites of House Wrens: Effects on nest site attractiveness and ectoparasite loads. Journal of Field Ornithology 67:212-221.
Jones, J. 2001. Habitat selection studies in avian ecology: A critical review. Auk 118:557-562.
Kern, M. D. 1984. Racial differences in nests of White-crowned Sparrow. Condor 86:455-466
Kossenko, S. M. and C. H. Fry. 1998. Competition and coexistence of the European Bee-eater Merops apiaster and the Blue-cheeked Bee-eater Merops persicus in Asia. Ibis 140:2-13.
Li, P. J. and T. E. Martin. 1991. Nest-site selection and nesting success of cavity-nesting birds in high elevation forest drainages. Auk 108:405-418.
Loye, J. and T. W. Regan. 1991. The cliff swallow bug oeciacus vigarius(Hemiptera, Cimidae)in Floria-Ectoparasite implications for hole-nesting birds. Medical and Veterinary Entomology 5:511-513.
Loye, J. E. and S. P. Carroll. 1998. Ectoparasite behavior and its effects on avian nest site selection. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 91:159-163.
Mappes, T., J. Mappes, and J. Kotiaho. 1994. Ectoparasites, nest-site choice and breeding success in the Pied Flycatcher. Oecologia 98:147-149.
Martin, T. E. and J. J. Roper. 1988. Nest predation and nest-site selection of a western population of the Hermit Thrush. Condor 90:51-57.
Matthysen, T. E. and F. Adriaensen. 1998. Forest size and isolation have no reporductive success of Eurasian Nuthatches (Sitta europaea). Auk 115:955-963.
Mazgajski, T. D. 2003. Nest site choice in relation to the presence of old nests and cavity depth in the starling Sturnus vulgaris. Ethology Ecology & Evolution 15:273-281.
Moller, A. P. 1990. Effects of parasitism by a hematophagous mite on reproduction in the Barn Swallow. Ecology 71:2345-2357.
Moss, W. W. and J. H. Camin. 1970. Nest Parasitism, Productivity and Clutch Size In Purple Martins. Science 168:1000-1003.
Newton, I. 1994. The role of nest sites in limiting the numbers of hole-nesting birds - a review. Biological Conservation 70:265-276.
Olsson, K. and K. Allander. 1995. Do Fleas, and/or old nest material, influence nest-site preference in hole-nesting Passerines. Ethology 101:160-170.
Oppliger, A., H. Richner, and P. Christe. 1994. Effect of an ectoparasite on lay date, nest-site choice, desertion, and hatching success in the Great Tit (Parus major). Behavioral Ecology 5:130-134.
Orell, M., S. Rytkonen, and K. Ilomaki. 1993. Do pied flycatchers prefer nest boxes with old material? Annales Zoologici Fennici 30:313-316.
Rendell, W. B. and N. A. M. Verbeek. 1996. Old nest material in nestboxes of tree swallows: Effects on reproductive success. Condor 98:142-152.
Richmond, S., E. Nol, M. Campbell, and D. Burke. 2007. Conspecfic and Interspecfic nest reuse by Wood Thrush (Hylocichla mustelina). Northeastern naturalist 14:629-636.
Rytkonen, S., R. Lehtonen, and M. Orell. 1998. Breeding Great Tits Parus major avoid nestboxes infested with fleas. Ibis 140:687-690.
Shen, S.-F. 2002. The ecology of cooperative breeding Taiwan Yuhinas (Yuhina brunneiceps) in Mayfeng areas. National Taiwan University Taiwan.
Soler, J. J., A. P. Moller, and M. Soler. 1998. Nest building, sexual selection and parental investment. Evolutionary Ecology 12:427-441.
Styrsky, J. N. 2005. Influence of predation on nest-site reuse by an open-cup nesting neotropical passerine. The Condor 107:133-137.
Szep, T. and A. P. Moller. 2000. Exposure to ectoparasites increases within-brood variability in size and body mass in the Sand Martin. Oecologia 125:201-207.
Thompson, C. F. and A. J. Neill. 1991. House Wrens do not prefer clean nestboxes. Animal Behaviour 42:1022-1024.
Thorstrom, R., C. M. Morales, and J. D. Ramos. 2001. Fidelity to territory, nest site and mate, survivorship, and reproduction of two sympatric Forest-Falcons. Journal of Raptor Research 35:98-106.
Ueda, K. 1989. Re-use of courtship nests for quick remating in the polygynous fan-Tailed Warbler Cisticola-juncidis. Ibis 131:257-262.
Waters, J. R., B. R. Noon, and J. Verner. 1990. Lack of nest site limitation in a cavity-nesting bird community. Journal of Wildlife Management 54:239-245.
Watts, B. D. 1987. Old nest accumulation as a possible protection mechanism against search-strategy predators. Animal Behaviour 35:1566-1568.
Wiebe, K. L., W. D. Koenig, and K. Martin. 2006. Evolution of clutch size in cavity-excavating birds: The nest site limitation hypothesis revisited. American Naturalist 167:343-353.
Wiebe, K. L., W. D. Koenig, and K. Martin. 2007. Costs and benefits of nest reuse versus excavation in cavity-nesting birds. Annales Zoologici Fennici 44:209-217.
Wimberger, P. H. 1984. The use of green plant-material in bird nests to avoid ectoparasites. Auk 101:615-618.
Withers, P. C. 1977. Energetic aspects of reproduction by Cliff Swallow. Auk 94:718-725.
Wysocki, D. 2004. Nest re-use by Blackbirds - the way for safe breeding? Acta Ornithologica 39:164-168.
Yuan, H. W., D. B. Burt, L. P. Wang, W. L. Chang, M. K. Wang, C. R. Chiou, and T. S. Ding. 2006a. Colony site choice of Blue-tailed Bee-eaters: influences of soil, vegetation, and water quality. Journal of Natural History 40:485-493.
Yuan, H. W., M. K. Wang, W. L. Chang, L. P. Wang, Y. M. Chen, and C. R. Chiou. 2006b. Soil composition affects the nesting behavior ofBblue-tailed Bee-eaters (Merops philippinus) on Kinmen Island. Ecological Research 21:510-512.
王力平. 2003. 金門島栗喉蜂虎(Merops Philippinus)營巢地選擇與繁殖生物學研究 碩士論文, 國立台灣大學森林學研究所.
王元均. 2005. 金門島栗喉蜂虎單獨與集體營巢之生殖策略分析 碩士論文, 國立台灣大學森林暨資源學系研究所.
王怡平. 2005. 金門島栗喉蜂虎(Merops philippinus)營巢棲地復育效應與棲地選擇模式 碩士論文, 國立台灣大學森林暨資源研究所.
周民雄. 1990. 夏日的精靈-栗喉蜂虎: 內政部營建署金門國家公園管理處.
郭城孟 and 陳尊賢. 2002. 金門國家公園土壤調查分析及植生適應性研究.
陳鋒蔚. 2010. 栗喉蜂虎(Merops Philippinus)幫手在親鳥餵食幼鳥時期之影響 碩士論文, 國立台灣大學森林暨資源學系研究所
蔡佩妤. 2007. 金門島栗喉蜂虎生殖經驗對於繁殖棲地忠實性之影響 碩士論文, 國立台灣大學生命科學院生態學與演化生物學所.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/8792-
dc.description.abstract本論文第一章回顧舊巢使用對於繁殖個體帶來的好處和壞處,以及環境因子如何影響鳥類選擇使用舊巢繁殖;一般而言使用舊巢能降低築巢所需投資的時間跟能量,但是使用舊巢也可能有寄生蟲以及巢洞不穩固的風險。第二章為栗喉蜂虎(Merops philipinnus)使用新、舊巢個體分別進行生殖對其生殖成功之探討。栗喉蜂虎每年4月到金門進行繁殖,在土坡挖掘洞穴營巢。過去的研究中發現在沙質坡面築巢的栗喉蜂虎不太會使用舊巢洞繁殖,而在土質較硬的營巢地則有觀察到使用舊巢洞繁殖的行為。本研究於2008年4-8月栗喉蜂虎繁殖季時,針對栗喉蜂虎使用新、舊巢洞的生殖行為進行觀察。本研究將營巢地分為有舊巢使用(昔果山OA、復國墩OB)與沒有舊巢使用(田埔NA、青年農莊NB,NC)兩種類型,於繁殖季前期照像記錄各營巢地坡面上舊巢洞的位置,進入繁殖季後,每兩天使用針孔式攝影機記錄洞內生殖狀況,繁殖結束後則測量坡面上巢洞位置以及高度。結果顯示:1.使用舊巢洞的栗喉蜂虎繁殖成功率顯著高於使用新巢洞者(P=0.0005)、且顯著較早開始下蛋(p=0.0048)及離巢(p<0.0001),推測因使用舊巢洞降低挖巢洞所需的時間和能量,導致了使用舊巢洞繁殖者較早開始繁殖且有較好的繁殖成功率。2.有舊巢使用的營巢地繁殖成功率顯著高於無舊巢使用的營巢地(p=0.0015),且顯著較早離巢(p=0.0001),並且有舊巢使用的營巢地土壤壓力較高(p=0.0335);推測有舊巢使用的營巢地具有較好的環境品質,且因為土壤壓力高所以營巢地不易崩毀,因而土壤壓力高可能是栗喉蜂虎選擇使用舊巢的原因之一。3.有使用的舊巢離地位置較高(p=0.0387)且巢洞較深(p=0.0148);栗喉蜂虎天敵主要從坡面下方捕食,推測栗喉蜂虎會傾向使用巢位較高的舊巢洞。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThe first chapter of this thesis is about factors which may influence birds to choose old nest as well as the benefit and cost of using old nests. Environment factors were also discussed. The second chapter is about the nest reuse behavior of Blue-tailed Bee-eater (Merops philipinnus). Breeding via old nest might save the energy and time of building a new nest, but reusing old nests could be unstable and in danger of an ectoparasitic infection. Blue-tailed Bee-eaters breed by migrating to Kinmen Island in April every year, where they roost by digging holes on soil banks. From previous studies it was found that bee-eaters generally do not breed in the old nest on sandy banks, and only a minority of birds breed in old nests, which are mostly located in Ci-Kuo-Shan and Fou-Kuo-Dun. I monitored the nest by observing the behavior of Bee-eaters during April-August in 2008. In this study I divided the colonies into two groups, which were: 1) those within nest-reuse behavior group (Ci-Kuo-Shan and Fou-Kuo-Dun) and 2) those without nest-reuse behavior group (Youth farm and Tien-pu). Before the arrival of breeding season, I recorded the locations of old nests on the banks, and when the breeding season ended , I recorded the breeding situations inside the nests every two days. After the young fledged, I then measured the location of their nests. According to the data obtained, I found the followings: 1. birds breed via old nests had higher reproductive success compared to birds that excavated new nests. I also found that “old nest breeder” bred earlier; therefore, I suggest that the nest-reusing behavior in Blue-tailed Bee-eater is time and energy saving since those birds that use old nests do not need to excavate new ones. This resulted in an earlier breeding and increased reproductive success. 2. Birds bred earlier in the sites with nest reuse than those without, and the average reproductive success was higher in the former group, too. In addition, I also found that the soil pressure of breeding sites with old nests was higher. The average reproductive success of a site could be an index of its quality. For this reason I suggest that these sites are higher in quality thereby promoting higher reproductive success. Furthermore, if the soil pressure on banks are high, nests wouldn’t collapse easily. According to reasons above, I suggest that bee-eaters prefer to use old nests which are located on a good site with higher soil pressure. 3. The old nests that were used in 2008 were located higher than those that were unused, indicating that bee-eaters prefer using old nests that were located higher up the ground in order to avoid predators.en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-05-20T20:01:24Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-99-R96625025-1.pdf: 542779 bytes, checksum: a10fca81b11abb770433812e2ec4ff94 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2010
en
dc.description.tableofcontents中文摘要 I
Abstract II
目錄 1
文獻回顧 2
前言 12
研究方法 15
結果 20
討論 25
參考文獻 31
表 36
圖 41
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.title舊巢洞使用與否對栗喉蜂虎繁殖成功的影響zh_TW
dc.titleEffects of nest reuse on reproductive success of Blue-tailed Bee-eaters (Merops philippinus)en
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear99-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee劉小如(Lucia Liu),謝寶森(Bao-Sen Shieh),許育誠(Yu-Cheng Hsu),丁宗蘇(Tzung-Su DING)
dc.subject.keyword栗喉蜂虎,金門,集體營巢,舊巢使用,繁殖成功,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordblue-tailed bee-eater,colonial breeding,Kinmen Island,nest reuse,reproductive success,en
dc.relation.page49
dc.rights.note同意授權(全球公開)
dc.date.accepted2011-08-17
dc.contributor.author-college生物資源暨農學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept森林環境暨資源學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:森林環境暨資源學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-99-1.pdf530.06 kBAdobe PDF檢視/開啟
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved