請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/87911完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 曾智揚 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Chih-Yang Tseng | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 廖珮伶 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Pei Ling Liao | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-07-31T16:16:00Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2023-11-09 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2023-07-31 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2023 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2023-06-16 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | 陳建中與張容榕. (2022). 策略會影響成本習性嗎?差異化策略與成本不對稱性. 會計與公司治理 (Vol. 17, pp. 97-134): 財團法人逢甲會計教育基金會暨逢甲大學會計學系.
Abdelhay, M. A., Youssef, A. M., and Awad, M. H. (2021). Asymmetric Cost Behavior Across Life Cycle Stages. International Journal of Accounting and Financial Reporting, Vol. 11. Anderson, M. C., Banker, R. D., and Janakiraman, S. N. (2003). Are selling, general, and administrative costs “sticky”? Journal of accounting research, 41(1), 47-63. Autore, D. M., Bray, D. E., and Peterson, D. R. (2009). Intended use of proceeds and the long-run performance of seasoned equity issuers. Journal of Corporate Finance, 15(3), 358-367. Baker, M., and Wurgler, J. (2002). Market Timing and Capital Structure. The Journal of Finance, 57(1), 1-32. Baker, M., and Wurgler, J. (2007). Investor Sentiment in the Stock Market. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21(2), 129-152. Banker, R. D., and Byzalov, D. (2014). Asymmetric Cost Behavior. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 26(2), 43-79. Banker, R. D., Byzalov, D., and Chen, L. T. (2013). Employment protection legislation, adjustment costs and cross-country differences in cost behavior. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 55(1), 111-127. Banker, R. D., Byzalov, D., Ciftci, M., and Mashruwala, R. (2014). The moderating effect of prior sales changes on asymmetric cost behavior. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 26(2), 221-242. Banker, R. D., Flasher, R., and Zhang, D. ( 2013). Strategic Positioning and Asymmetric Cost Behavior. AAA 2014 Management Accounting Section (MAS) Meeting Paper. Barberis, N., Shleifer, A., and Vishny, R. (1998). A model of investor sentiment. Journal of Financial Economics, 49(3), 307-343. Bayless, M., and Chaplinsky, S. (1996). Is There a Window of Opportunity for Seasoned Equity Issuance? The Journal of Finance, 51(1), 253-278. Brown, J. R., and Floros, I. V. (2012). Access to private equity and real firm activity: Evidence from PIPEs. Journal of Corporate Finance, 18(1), 151-165. Carlson, M., Fisher, A., and Giammarino, R. (2006). Corporate investment and asset price dynamics: Implications for SEO event studies and long‐run performance. The Journal of Finance, 61(3), 1009-1034. Carlson, M., Fisher, A., and Giammarino, R. (2010). SEO Risk Dynamics. The Review of Financial Studies, 23(11), 4026-4077. Chen, C. X., Lu, H., and Sougiannis, T. (2012). The agency problem, corporate governance, and the asymmetrical behavior of selling, general, and administrative costs. Contemporary Accounting Research, 29(1), 252-282. Chen, C. X., Nasev, J., and Wu, S. Y.-C. (2022). CFO overconfidence and cost behavior. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 34(2), 117-135. Chen, J. V., and Kama, I. (2016). The tone of management forward looking statements and asymmetric cost behavior. Costa, M. D., and Opare, S. (2022). Cost asymmetry around seasoned equity offerings. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 34, 100668. DeAngelo, H., DeAngelo, L., and Stulz, R. M. (2010). Seasoned equity offerings, market timing, and the corporate lifecycle. Journal of Financial Economics, 95(3), 275-295. Dittmar, A., and Thakor, A. (2007). Why do firms issue equity? The Journal of Finance, 62(1), 1-54. Elliott, W. B., Koëter-Kant, J., and Warr, R. S. (2008). Market timing and the debt–equity choice. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 17(2), 175-197. Fang, S. (2014). Real Cost Management around Loan Financing. Temple University. Floros, I. V., and Sapp, T. R. A. (2012). Why do firms issue private equity repeatedly? On the motives and information content of multiple PIPE offerings. Journal of Banking and Finance, 36(12), 3469-3481. Hall, C. M. (2016). Does ownership structure affect labor decisions? The Accounting Review, 91(6), 1671-1696. Kama, I., and Weiss, D. (2013). Do earnings targets and managerial incentives affect sticky costs? Journal of accounting research, 51(1), 201-224. Kim, W., and Weisbach, M. S. (2008). Motivations for public equity offers: An international perspective. Journal of Financial Economics, 87(2), 281-307. Kuang, Y. F., Mohan, A., and Qin, B. (2015). CEO overconfidence and cost stickiness. Management Control and Accounting (2), 26-32. Lee, W. J., Pittman, J., and Saffar, W. (2020). Political uncertainty and cost stickiness: Evidence from national elections around the world. Contemporary Accounting Research, 37(2), 1107-1139. Loughran, T., and Ritter, J. R. (1995). The new issues puzzle. The Journal of Finance, 50(1), 23-51. Loughran, T., and Ritter, J. R. (1997). The operating performance of firms conducting seasoned equity offerings. The Journal of Finance, 52(5), 1823-1850. Rangan, S. (1998). Earnings management and the performance of seasoned equity offerings. Journal of Financial Economics, 50(1), 101-122. Spiess, D. K., and Affleck-Graves, J. (1995). Underperformance in long-run stock returns following seasoned equity offerings. Journal of Financial Economics, 38(3), 243-267. Venieris, G., Naoum, V. C., and Vlismas, O. (2015). Organisation capital and sticky behaviour of selling, general and administrative expenses. Management Accounting Research, 26, 54-82. Walker, M. D., and Yost, K. (2008). Seasoned equity offerings: What firms say, do, and how the market reacts. Journal of Corporate Finance, 14(4), 376-386. Xue, S., and Hong, Y. (2016). Earnings management, corporate governance and expense stickiness. China Journal of Accounting Research, 9(1), 41-58. | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/87911 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本研究探討現金增資與成本僵固性之關聯性,由於現金增資與成本僵固性是財會領域中重要之議題,且實務中,現金增資是公司重要的籌資方式,而成本僵固性是企業需要了解並持續面對的議題,故二者間有何關聯將是重要探討議題。
進行現金增資動機可能是因為理性投資理論或是市場擇時理論,前者顯示公司為了籌集資金以發展或是延續的計畫,後者闡述經理人會挑選對於公司有利的時機進行增資,也就是股價過高,而此現象通常與投資人對公司消息過度反應,此時公司會儲備現金並等待好的計畫出現,二者皆顯示了對於未來較為樂觀的預期,或是對於計畫的延續性。經理人對於未來較樂觀的預期與為了計畫的延續,皆會使經理人在成本使用上出現改變。 本文以測試收入與成本變動幅度之模型檢視公司對於收入上升與下降時成本是否會有不同幅度的改變,也就是成本不對稱性,利用2002年至2021年台灣上市櫃公司之財務資料進行分析,實證結果發現,現金增資之事件會對當期公司之成本更為僵固。另外,本研究也針對增資之重大性、公司預期的資金用途與對成本僵固性影響之長期效果進行分析,首先發現增資金額對成本僵固的影響相同,而不同的增資目的可能使經理人的成本使用有所不同,最後,現金增資事件也對成本僵固性於前後年間造成不同程度的影響。而根據不同類型之現金增資類別會使公司之僵固性不同,本文以首次公開發行與私募股權進行探索,發現首次公開發行對成本僵固性的影響不大,而私募股權雖會比一般之現金增資成本更加僵固,但不具延續性。 總結來說,此項研究的重要性在於深入探索現金增資與成本僵固性之間的關聯性,增加對其之認識,以及其對公司決策和營運的影響。研究結果對財會領域的理論和實務具有貢獻,並提供投資者對公司更全面的了解,也協助公司了解其整體營運中之可能特性,以利做出最佳之決策。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | This study investigates the relationship between seasoned equity offering and cost stickiness, as both are important topics in the field of accounting and finance. In practice, seasoned equity offering is a significant financing method for companies, while cost stickiness is a crucial issue that businesses need to understand and address. Therefore, understanding the relationship between these two factors is an important area of exploration.
The motivation behind conducting seasoned equity offering can be attributed to rational investment theory or market timing theory. The former suggests that companies raise funds to support development or ongoing projects. On the other hand, market timing theory explains that managers choose opportune moments to increase capital, often driven by an overreaction of investors to company news. In such cases, companies accumulate cash and wait for favorable opportunities to arise. Both theories imply a more optimistic outlook for the future or the continuity of specific projects. Managers' optimistic expectations or the need to sustain projects can result in changes in cost allocation and utilization. This study employs a model that tests the asymmetry between revenue and cost variations by examining whether costs exhibit different degrees of change when revenue increases or decreases. The analysis utilizes financial data from listed companies in Taiwan from 2002 to 2021. The empirical results indicate that cash capital increases lead to greater cost stickiness in the current period. Additionally, the study analyzes the long-term effects of significant capital increases, companies' expected use of funds, and the impact of cash capital increases on cost stickiness in subsequent years. It finds that the amount of capital increase has a consistent effect on cost stickiness, but different purposes of capital increase may result in variations in cost allocation by managers. Moreover, seasoned equity offering events have different effects on cost stickiness between the pre-event and post-event years. The study also explores the impact of different types of cash capital increases and identifies that initial public offerings (IPOs) do not have a significant effect on cost stickiness, while private equity placements exhibit higher stickiness but lack continuity. In conclusion, this study's significance lies in its in-depth exploration of the relationship between cash capital increases and cost stickiness, providing a better understanding of these factors and their impact on company decision-making and operations. The findings contribute to both theoretical and practical aspects of the accounting and finance field and offer investors a more comprehensive understanding of companies, aiding in making informed investment decisions. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2023-07-31T16:16:00Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2023-07-31T16:16:00Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 目錄
誌謝-----------------------------------------------------I 中文摘要-------------------------------------------------II ABSTRACT------------------------------------------------III 目錄-----------------------------------------------------V 表目錄---------------------------------------------------VII 第一章、緒論----------------------------------------------1 1.1研究背景-------------------------------------------1 1.2研究動機-------------------------------------------2 1.3研究架構-------------------------------------------4 第二章、文獻回顧與假說發展----------------------------------5 2.1文獻回顧-------------------------------------------5 2.2假說建立-------------------------------------------10 第三章、研究方法-------------------------------------------13 3.1樣本選取與分布--------------------------------------13 3.2模型-----------------------------------------------15 第四章、實證結果與分析--------------------------------------19 4.1敘述性統計------------------------------------------19 4.2主要測試結果----------------------------------------24 第五章、額外測試--------------------------------------------29 5.1現金增資金額----------------------------------------29 5.2現金增資目的對成本僵固性之影響------------------------31 5.3不同時期對對成本僵固性之影響--------------------------40 5.4首次公開發行對成本僵固性之影響-------------------------43 5.5私募對成本僵固性之影響--------------------------------46 5.6成長性對成本僵固性------------------------------------49 第六章、結論-------------------------------------------------53 6.1研究結論與貢獻----------------------------------------53 6.2 研究限制---------------------------------------------54 6.3 未來研究方向-----------------------------------------55 參考文獻-----------------------------------------------------57 附錄、變數統整表----------------------------------------------61 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.subject | 成本決策 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 首次公開發行 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 現金增資目的 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 現金增資 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 成本僵固性 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Seasoned equity offering | en |
| dc.subject | Purposes of seasoned equity offering | en |
| dc.subject | initial public offerings (IPOs) | en |
| dc.subject | Cost Stickiness | en |
| dc.subject | Cost Decisions | en |
| dc.title | 現金增資與成本僵固性之關聯性分析 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Analysis of Relationship between Seasoned Equity Offering and Cost Stickiness | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 111-2 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 陳建中;葛俊佑 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Chien-Chung Chen;Chun-You Ko | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 成本決策,成本僵固性,現金增資,現金增資目的,首次公開發行, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Cost Decisions,Cost Stickiness,Seasoned equity offering,Purposes of seasoned equity offering,initial public offerings (IPOs), | en |
| dc.relation.page | 62 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202301009 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(限校園內公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2023-06-16 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 會計學系 | - |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2028-06-16 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 會計學系 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-111-2.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 1.32 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
