請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/87764
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 沈瓊桃 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.advisor | Chiung-Tao Shen | en |
dc.contributor.author | 吳聖柔 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author | Sheng-Jou Wu | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-07-19T16:21:49Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-11-09 | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2023-07-19 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2023 | - |
dc.date.submitted | 2023-05-17 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | 包承恩、王永慈譯(2013)。《社會工作價值與倫理》。台北:洪葉。
伍偉華。(2014)。〈視訊會面交往-美國家事法探視權之借鏡〉。《法令月刊》, 65(4),61-96。 王增勇(2002)。《社會工作者專業自覺的初探》。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究成果報告。 王純娟(2002)。〈經驗性學習方案之成果評鑑:以「角色扮演」方案為例〉,《彰化師大輔導學報》,23,197-227。 白倩如 (2020)。 〈提升社會工作實習學生自主學習效能:增權取向實習教育〉,《社會政策與社會工作學刊》,24(2),183-218。 沈瓊桃 (2022)。《親權與兒權:子女會面交往的權力衝突與服務模式成效評估》。科技部專題研究計劃報告書。(MOST 108-2410-H-002 -202 -MY2) 李懿玲(2016)。《社工員在「未成年子女監督會面交往」服務中之困境探究》。 玄奘大學社會福利與社會工作學系碩士論文。 李麗珠(2006)。《離婚後未成年子女會面交往之研究》。國立中正大學法律研究所碩士論文。 李聲吼(1997)。人力資源發展的能力與內涵。《就業與訓練》,2,21-58。 林進生、陳政龍、周家穎、謝政道(2017)。〈父母對其未成年子女會面交往權之研究〉,《美和學報》,36(1),121-136。 林佩瑾(2017)。《學校和督導沒教的事-臺灣社會團體工作專業養成與發展》。國立臺灣大學社會工作學系博士論文。 林萬億(2022)。《當代社會工作――理論與方法》。台北:五南。 林進生、陳政龍、周家穎、謝政道(2017)。〈父母對其未成年子女會面交往權之研究〉,《美和學報》,36(1),121-136。 林秉賢(2016)。《台灣社會工作專業繼續教育之生態與社會工作專業勝任能力之研究-以財團法人台灣兒童暨家庭扶助基金會為例》。東海大學社會工作學系博士學位論文。 林旖旎(2003)。〈基礎會談技巧訓練之實施效果研究〉,《玄奘學報》,6,115-136。 邱憶晨(2016)。《探視父母使用未成年子女會面交往服務之親子關係維繫經驗》。臺北大學社會工作學系碩士學位論文。 周月清(2002)。〈台灣社會工作專業發展的危機與轉機――社工教育與實務的省思〉,《社區發展季刊》,99,95-125。 映晟社會工作師事務所(2015)。《未成年子女監督會面工作手冊》(未出版)。新北市政府社會局委託映晟社會工作師事務所辦理新北市未成年子女監督會面交往及交付服務方案。 施慧玲(2004)。《家庭法律社會學論文集》。臺北:元照出版社。 柯智慧(2004)。《醫務社會工作者應具備之醫務社會工作核心能力-以醫學中心為例》。東海大學社會工作學系碩士學位論文。 胡幼慧、姚美華(2008),《質性研究:理論、方法及本土女性研究實例》。臺北市:巨流。 高淑清(2008)。質性研究的 18 堂課-揚帆再訪之旅。高雄市:麗文文化。 高鳳仙 (2007)。《家庭暴力防治法規專論》。台北市:五南。 高淑清(2001)。〈在美華人留學生太太的生活世界:詮釋與反思〉。《本土心理學研究》,16,225-285。 許翠玲(2018)。〈 如何辦理未成年子女的會面交往-兼談台灣新竹地方法院經驗(上)〉,《司法週刊》,1930,2-3。 許翠玲(2018)。〈 如何辦理未成年子女的會面交往-兼談台灣新竹地方法院經驗(下)〉,《司法週刊》,1932,2-3。 張憶純、郭世豐、顏玉如、張錦麗、彭南元(2022)。《司法社會工作理論與實務》。台北市:雙葉。 張可婷(譯)(2013)。《質性研究分析方法》(原作者:H. Boeije)。新北市:韋伯文化。(原作出版年:2010)。 莫藜藜(2007)。〈台灣社會工作學科教育的發展變革的需求〉。《社區發展季刊》,120, 30-47。 張恒愷(2000)。《國小學生音樂欣賞能力指標建構之研究》。臺灣師大音研所碩士論文。 曾華源(2016)。〈社會工作發展趨勢與台灣專業教育的對應〉。《社區發展季刊》,155, 3-16。 萬育維、賴資雯 (1996)。〈專業認同與工作滿意之間的關係探討--以從事兒童保護社會工作人員為例〉。《東吳社會工作學報》,2,305-331。 彭懷真(2016)。〈認同社會價值嗎?透過對社工系一二年級學生的調查來檢視〉。《社區發展季刊》,155,33-50。 陳業鑫(2019)。〈與未成年子女會面交往之司法觀點(上)〉。《司法周刊》,1225,第 2-3 版。 陳祈安(2017)。《家暴相對人與「未成年子女會面交往服務」之經驗與改變內涵及影響因素之探討》。國立政治大學社會工作研究所碩士學位論文。 陳竹上(2013)。〈臺灣社會離兒童權利公約還有多遠?一位家事調解委員的近身觀察〉,《新世紀智庫論壇》,64,42-58。 陳香君(2012)。《臺灣學校社會工作人員專業知能探討》。國立臺灣大學社會工作學系碩士學位論文。 陳麗欣(2009)。〈台灣社工大學畢業生專業勝任能力完備性與機構實習成效之研究〉。《復興崗學報》,96,155-186。 陳向明(2002)。《社會科學質的研究》。臺北市:五南。 鈕文英(2021)。《質性研究方法與論文寫作》。臺北市:雙葉書廊。 黃心怡、謝子瓔、劉于瑞、宋名萍、蕭丞芳(2020)。《合作父母與親子會面-一群本土社工的看見》。臺北:啟示出版。 游美貴、鄭麗珍、張秀鴛、莊珮瑋、邱琇琳(2016)。〈推動一站式家庭暴力多元處遇服務方案〉,《社區發展季刊》,156,293-301。 黃淑惠(2019)。《公部門社會工作督導知能養成之研究》。國立台灣大學社會工作學系碩士論文。 黃侃如(2003)。《精神社工專業認同之形塑與掙扎》。東吳大學社會工作學系碩士論文。 潘淑滿(2003)。《質性研究理論與研究》。臺北市:心理。 鄭雅丰、陳新轉(2011)。〈能力概念及其教育意義之探討〉,《教育研究與發展期刊》,7(2),27-56。 賴月蜜等譯(2005)。《監督親子會面:佛羅里達州監督親子會面中心訓練手冊》。內政部。 謝惠菁(2012)。《受暴婦女聲請及使用「未成年子女會面交往服務」歷程經驗之探究》。國立暨南國際大學社會政策與社會工作學系碩士論文。 簡婕(2017)。《父母分居、離婚後未成年子女會面交往之研究-以共同照顧模式為中心》。國立臺灣大學法律學研究所學位論文。 Areán, J. C., & Mederos, F. (2008). Fathering after violence. Family violence prevention fund. Blakemore, T., & Agllias, K. (2019). Student reflections on vulnerability and self-awareness in a social work skills course. Australian Social Work, 72(1), 21-33. Cournoyer, B. R. (2016). The social work skills workbook. Cengage Learning. Babb, B. A., Danziger, G. H., Moran, J. D., & Mack, W. (2009). Supervised visitation and monitored exchange: Review of the literature and annotated bibliography. Baltimore: The Maryland Judiciary Research Consortium. Brown, H. C. (2007). The knowledge base of social work. In A. A. Vass (Ed.), Social work competencies: Core knowledge, values and skills (pp. 8–35). London: Sage. Birnbaum, R., & Alaggia, R. (2006). Supervised visitation: A call for a second generation of research. Family Court Review, 44(1), 119-134. Bowlby, J.(1977). The making and breaking of affectional bonds. II. Some principles of psychotherapy. The fiftieth Maudsley Lecture. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 130(5), 421-431. Brandt, E.B.(2007). ―Concerns at the Margins of Supervised Access to Children. Journal of Law & Family Studies, 9(2). 201-456. CSWE(2022). Educational Policy and Accreditation Standards. Alexandria: The Council on Social Work Education. Crook, W. P., & Oehme, K. (2007). Characteristics of supervised visitation programs serving child maltreatment and other cases. Brief Treatment and Crisis Intervention, 7(4), 291–304. Day, J. M. (1994). Obligation and motivation: Obstacles and resources for counselor well-being and effectiveness. Journal of Counseling and Development, 73, 108-110. Epstein, R. M., & Hundert, E. M. (2002). Defining and assessing professional competence. Jama, 287(2), 226-235. Feize, L., & Faver, C. (2019). Teaching self-awareness: social work educators’ endeavors and struggles. Social Work Education, 38(2), 159-176. Davletkaliev, D. K., Zueva, N. K., Lebedeva, N. V., Mkrtumova, I. V., & Timofeeva, O. (2015). Professional Competence Development of the Social Work Specialists in the Period of Study in the System of Additional Education. International Education Studies, 8(6), 176-183. Gergen, K. (1985). The social constructionist movement in modern psychology. American psychologist, 40(3), 266-275. Heimonen, I.M., Natland, S., Tøge, A.G., & Hansen, H.C. (2016). The Effects of Skill Training on Social Workers’ Professional Competences in Norway: Results of a Cluster-Randomised Study. British Journal of Social Work, 46(5), 1354-1371. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcv073 Homonoff, E. (2008). The heart of social work: Best practitioners rise to challenges in field instruction. The Clinical Supervisor, 27(2), 135–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/07325220802490828 Hoare, C. (Ed.). (2006). Handbook of adult development and learning. Oxford University Press. Horwath, J., & Morrison, T. (1999). Effective staff training in social care: From theory to practice. Routledge. Joly, M. P., Blais, M. F., Poirier, M. A., Gervais, M. J., & Duran, M. S. (2021). Practitioners' views on the effects of the “For caring supervised visitation in child welfare” training. Child Abuse & Neglect, 105167. Karpetis, G. (2017). Social work skills: A narrative review of the literature. British Journal of Social Work, 48(3), 596-615. Menon, S. (2019). Social Work Skills and Knowledge. Society Publishing. Lewis, M. (2013). A study of parents and supervised visitation in a child welfare setting (Master's thesis, Humboldt State University). Levy, C. S. (1973). The value base of social work. Journal of education for social work, 9(1), 34-42. Marschall, T. A. (2014). An examination of existing and necessary qualifications of practitioners providing supervised visitation/parenting time services. American International Journal of Social Science, 3(7), 1-13. McAshan, H. H. (1979). Competency-based education and behavioral objectives. Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Educational Technology Publications. McWey, L. M., & Mullis, A. K. (2004). Improving the lives of children in foster care: The impact of supervised visitation. Family Relations, 53(3), 293-300. Mulder, M. (2014). Conceptions of professional competence. In International handbook of research in professional and practice-based learning (pp. 107-137). Springer, Dordrecht. Maxwell, M. S., & Oehme, K. (2001). Strategies to improve supervised visitation services in domestic violence cases. Violence Against Women Online Resources. Retrieved from http://www.vaw.umn.edu The National Association of Social Workers (NASW), Code of ethics, Retrieved 2022/2/25 from the World Wide Web: https://www.socialworkers.org/About/Ethics/Code-of-Ethics/Code-of-Ethics-English Oehme, K.,Perko, A., Castillo, K., Lodes, M.(2017). A training manual for Florida’s Supervised Visitation Programs. Floridaa , USA: Institute For Family Violence Studies. Oehme, K., & O'Rourke, K. (2011). Protecting victims and their children through supervised visitation: A study of domestic violence injunctions. Faulkner Law Review, 3(2), 261-272. O’Hagan, M.(2007). Competence in social work practice: A practical guide for students and professionals , London : Jessica Kingsley Publisher Ltd. Parker, T., Rogers, K., Collins, M., & Edleson, J. L. (2008). Danger zone battered mothers and their families in supervised visitation. Violence against women, 14(11), 1313-1325. Parker, J. (2007). ‘Developing Effective Practice Learning for Tomorrow’s Social Workers’, Social Work Education, 26(8): 763- 779. Sim, T., He, M., & Dominelli, L. (2022). Social Work Core Competencies in Disaster Management Practice: An Integrative Review. Research on Social Work Practice, 32(3), 310–321. Saini, M., Van Wert, M., & Gofman, J. (2012). Parent–child supervised visitation within child welfare and custody dispute contexts: An exploratory comparison of two distinct models of practice. Children and Youth Services Review, 34(1), 163-168. Sen, R., & Broadhurst, K. (2011). Contact between children in out-of-home placements and their family and friends networks: a research review. Child & Family Social Work, 16(3), 298-309. Sandberg, J., & Pinnington, A. H. (2009). Professional competence as ways of being: An existential ontological perspective. Journal of management studies, 46(7), 1138-1170. Shulman, L., Krause, D., & Cameron, M. (2009). The skills of helping individuals, families, groups and communities.Boston, MA:Cengage Learning. Stern, N., Crook, W., & Oehme, K. (2008). Visitation decisions in domestic violence cases: Seeking lessons from one state’s experience. The Wisconsin Law Journal of Gender and Society, 23, 113-134. Stern, N., & Oehme, K. (2007). Increasing safety for battered women and their children: Creating a privilege for supervised visitation intake records. University of Richmond Law Review, 41(2), 499-534. SVN(2006).Standards for supervised visitation practice.SVN standards. Task Force and the Standards and Guidelines Committee. Sinclair, I., Wilson, K. & Gibbs, I. (2005) Foster Placements: Why They Succeed and Why they Fail. Jessica Kingsley Publishers. Santo, G.(1989). Curriculum implication. In J.W. Burke(Ed.). Competency based education learning. The Falmer Press. Reamer, F. G.(2018). Social work values. Social work values and ethics.(p11-42). New York: Columbia University Press. Spencer, L. M. & Spencer, S. M. (1993). Competence at Work: Models for Superior Performance. New York: John Wiley & Sons. Trevithick, P. (2011). Social work skills and knowledge: A practice handbook. New York, USA: McGraw-Hill Education. Trevithick, P. (2008). Revisiting the knowledge base of social work: A framework for practice. The British Journal of Social Work, 38(6), 1212-1237. Trevithick, P. (2000). Social Work Skills: A Practice Handbook. Open University Press. Tracee P., Kellie R., Meghan C. & Jeffrey L.(2008). Danger Zone: Battered Mothers and Their Families in Supervised visitation, Violence Against Women, 14, 1313-1325. Wiles, F. (2013). “Not easily put into a box”: Constructing profes- sional identity. Social Work Education, 32(7), 854–866. Vass, A.A.(1996). Introduction: The quest for quality. In Antony A. V.(Ed).Social work competence: Core knowledge, values, skills, PP.1-7. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publication Inc. | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/87764 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 本研究旨在探討監督會面服務社工的專業養成,研究目的包含瞭解探討會面社工專業訓練之現況;探討會面服務社工認為重要的專業知能、專業知能養成經驗,以及其對專業知能訓練的需求,並提出實務面及政策面之建議。
本研究採質性研究取向,以主題分析法分析,針對會面服務年資在一年以上的社工為研究參與者進行一對一半結構式訪談,總共訪談6位社工。 本研究歸納會面社工角色功能有協調者、促進者、教育者、安全維護者、資源連結者、情緒支持者,並由知識、技巧、價值三方面探討會面社工專業知能,知識部分包含:社工理論基礎、心理動力、兒童權利公約相關法律、兒少發展知識及親職相關知識等;技巧的部分有會談技巧(含與孩子會談技巧、談判技巧、聯合會談技巧)、溝通技巧、衝突處理技巧及具敏感度的評估技巧等;價值部分包含以孩子的利益為重、每個人都有過更好生活的權利、防止負面代間傳遞、合作親職,以及會面社工本身在服務個案的過程中被修復的價值。 專業養成過程方面,本研究發現「做中學、學中做」為會面社工專業養成的核心。服務過程中遭遇的瓶頸有陷入權力拉扯的為難、邊同理邊拉界線的困難、面對家長不配合的情形、會面成果並不如期待,以及頻繁地被投訴等。渡過瓶頸的方式主要為個督、團督及參與自我照顧課程等。 而研究參與者認為會面社工養成所需的學校教育有以下:增加會面服務相關課程、課堂增加實務操作和討論、紮實且多元的會談技巧訓練及自我覺察和自我照顧課程。另機構教育可依據不同資歷的社工給予相對應的訓練內容。 另外,在研究中也發現目前整體會面的困境包含:因工作困難度高及業務量多,使社工流動率高、招聘困難,導致人力資源缺乏;因網絡單位資訊不流通或專業人員不願合作導致的服務不連續性,以及有時方案交接時若時間過於匆促,無法完整交接,可能造成服務不連續的問題。 最後,根據上述研究結果,本研究分別提出實務、政策與學術研究面的相關建議。實務面上,應增加學校與實務機構連結、學校開設自我覺察相關課程、機構按個別差異設計適宜訓練內容、機構更多關注社工自我照顧議題、建置會面評估指標工具;政策面上,建議政府更新會面訓練手冊、創造會面機構經驗交流機會,以及提高會面社工留任誘因;學術研究面上,建議可針對會面服務評估處遇模式進行探討。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | This study explores the professional development of supervised visitation service social workers, aiming to understand their current professional training, competencies, experiences, and demand for further training.
This study adopts qualitative research and uses a thematic analysis method. A total of 6 supervised visitation service social workers with more than one year of working experience were interviewed. The study identified the role functions of visitation social workers, which include coordinators, facilitators, educators, safety maintainers, resource connectors, and emotional supporters. The study identified three aspects of professional competencies: knowledge, skills, and values. The knowledge component includes social work theory, psychodynamics, relevant laws pertaining to the Convention on the Rights of the Child, child development, and parenting knowledge. The skill component includes communication skills, negotiation skills, conflict resolution skills, and sensitive assessment skills. The value component includes prioritizing the interests of the child, the right of every individual to a better life, prevention of negative intergenerational transmission, cooperative parenting, and the value of self-healing in the service process. The study found that "learning by doing" is at the core of the professional development of visitation social workers. However, the service process also presents several challenges, such as power struggles, difficulty of setting boundaries, dealing with uncooperative parents, visitation results not meeting expectations, and frequent complaints. The study suggests that individual supervision, group supervision, and self-care courses are essential ways to overcome these challenges. Participants of this study suggest increasing relevant courses on visitation services, adding practical operation and discussions in the classroom, solid and diverse conversation skills training, and self-awareness and self-care courses. The organization can also provide training content according to the different qualifications of social workers. Finally, based on the research results, this study provides suggestions for practice, policy, and academic research aspects. On the practical level, the study suggests increasing the connection between schools and practical organizations, offering self-awareness courses in schools, and providing employee assistance programs in practical organizations. On the policy level, the study suggests updating the supervised visitation training manual, establishing a standard operation procedure for visitation services and providing adequate resources and staffing. On the academic research level, the study suggests conducting follow-up studies on the effectiveness of professional training and interventions for visitation services. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2023-07-19T16:21:49Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2023-07-19T16:21:49Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 目錄
口試委員審定書 I 謝誌 II 摘要 III ABSTRACT V 目錄 VII 圖目錄 IX 表目錄 IX 第一章 研究緣起與研究目的 1 第一節 研究緣起與動機 1 第二節 研究問題及目的 6 第三節 名詞釋義 7 第二章 文獻探討 8 第一節 未成年子女會面交往服務 8 第二節 社會工作專業知能 20 第三節 會面社工專業知能及訓練 33 第三章 研究設計與方法 40 第一節 研究方法的選擇 40 第二節 研究資料蒐集與分析方式 41 第三節 研究對象的選取 44 第四節 研究嚴謹度 45 第五節 研究倫理 46 第四章 研究結果分析 48 第一節 會面社工角色功能與專業知能 48 第二節 會面社工專業養成經驗 77 第三節 整體會面服務困境 102 第四節 會面社工養成建議 106 第五章 討論與建議 118 第一節 研究結果摘要 118 第二節 研究結果討論 120 第三節 研究建議 125 第四節 研究限制與貢獻 128 參考文獻 129 附錄 139 附錄一 訪談知情同意書 139 附錄二 訪談大綱 143 | - |
dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
dc.title | 臺灣未成年子女監督會面交往社工專業知能養成探究 | zh_TW |
dc.title | A Study on Professional Competences of Social Workers in Supervised Visitation Programs in Taiwan | en |
dc.type | Thesis | - |
dc.date.schoolyear | 111-2 | - |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 林東龍;賴月蜜 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Dong-Long Lin;Yueh-Mi Lai | en |
dc.subject.keyword | 未成年子女會面交往服務,社工人員,專業知能,社工教育, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | supervised visitation services,social worker,professional competences,social work education, | en |
dc.relation.page | 144 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202300818 | - |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | - |
dc.date.accepted | 2023-05-17 | - |
dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | - |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 社會工作學系 | - |
顯示於系所單位: | 社會工作學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-111-2.pdf | 2.56 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。