請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/87571
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 歐昱辰 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.advisor | Yu-Chen Ou | en |
dc.contributor.author | 陳季璘 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author | Chi-Lin Chen | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-06-20T16:07:41Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-11-09 | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2023-06-20 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2022 | - |
dc.date.submitted | 2002-01-01 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | [1] 賈駿祥, "台灣地區橋梁工程之發展," 臺灣公路工程, vol. 30, No.4, 2004. 內政部營建署. [2] 黃炳勳, 吳弘明, 劉珊, and 蘇彥彰, "國內大跨徑預力梁橋面臨之問題與因應對策探討," 土木水利, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 30-43, 2018. [3] Z. P. Bazant, M. H. Hubler, and Q. Yu, "Pervasiveness of excessive segmental bridge deflections: Wake-up call for creep," ACI Structural Journal, vol. 108, no. 6, p. 766, 2011. [4] Z. P. Bažant, Q. Yu, and G.-H. Li, "Excessive long-time deflections of prestressed box girders. I: Record-span bridge in Palau and other paradigms," Journal of structural engineering, vol. 138, no. 6, pp. 676-686, 2012. [5] 加藤達也 and 辻英雄, "~平成の大改修~「浜名大橋」橋梁補強について," presented at the 平成23年度国土交通省国土技術研究会, 東京, 2011. [6] J.-C. Chern and T. C. Liu, "Life-Cycle Management of Sustainable Public Infrastructure," Taipei, Taiwan: Public Construction Commission, 2009. [7] Z. k. P. Bažant, Q. Yu, and G.-H. Li, "Excessive long-time deflections of prestressed box girders. II: Numerical analysis and lessons learned," Journal of Structural Engineering, vol. 138, no. 6, pp. 687-696, 2012. [8] MIDAS Civil. (2022). [9] Midas Bridge. "Construction Stage Analysis." (https://www.midasbridge.com/en/solutions/construction-stage-analysis.) [10] 財團法人中華顧問工程司. (2017) 混凝土橋梁常見劣化樣態探討. [11] 許資生, "潛變、乾縮、溫度對預力混凝土結構之影響研究," 博士論文, 土木工程學研究所, 國立臺灣大學, 台北市, 1996. [12] V. Kristek, Z. P. Bazant, M. Zich, and A. Kohoutkova, "Box girder bridge deflections," Concrete international, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 55-63, 2006. [13] K. Dolinajová and M. Moravčík, "Monitoring and numerical analysis of construction stages on the bridge realized by the free Cantilever Method," Procedia Engineering, vol. 65, pp. 321-326, 2013. [14] 王詠寬, "台灣長跨懸臂節塊施工預力混凝土橋梁長期變形研究," 2018. [15] 黃禾程, "以資料庫回歸台灣混凝土收縮與潛變預測模型並應用於預力橋梁長期變位分析," 2020. [16] 林軒佑, "預力混凝土箱型橋梁長期撓度控制," 碩士, 土木工程學研究所, 國立臺灣大學, 台北, 2021. [17] S. Adanur1c and A. Domaniç2d, "Construction stage analysis of Kömürhan highway bridge using time dependent material properties," Structural Engineering and Mechanics, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 207-223, 2010. [18] T. TENG, "Computational Modelling of Concrete Time-Dependent Mechanics and Its Application to Large-Scale Structure Analysis," University of Pittsburgh, 2017. [19] 鄒振平, "大跨距預力箱梁長期撓度之探討 - 以原山奇美橋為例," 碩士論文, 土木工程與環境資源管理研究所, 大漢技術學院, 花蓮縣, 2015. [20] SAP 2000. [21] T. Guo and Z. Chen, "Deflection control of long-span PSC box-girder bridge based on field monitoring and probabilistic FEA," Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, vol. 30, no. 6, p. 04016053, 2016. [22] 陸景文, "溫度對橋梁拱度之影響研究," 碩士論文, 土木工程學研究所, 國立臺灣大學, 台北市, 1996. [23] 張林鳳, "台灣地區混凝土橋梁溫度效應分析研究," 碩士論文, 土木工程學研究所, 國立臺灣大學, 台北市, 1995. [24] M. J. N. Priestley, "Design of Concrete Bridges for Temperature Gradients," American Concrete Institute, Journal of, vol. 75, pp. 209-217, 1978. [25] N. Chijiwa, S. Hayasaka, and K. Maekawa, "Long-term differential and averaged deformation of box-type pre-stressed concrete exposed to natural environment," Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 1-17, 2018. [26] (2020). 公路橋梁設計規範. [27] 丘惠生, "長跨懸臂節塊式預力混凝土橋梁長期變位控制研究," 博士論文, 土木工程學研究所, 國立臺灣大學, 台北市, 1995. [28] S. S. Vokunnaya and T. Tanaji, "Construction stage analysis of segmental cantilever bridge," International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET), vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 373-382, 2017. [29] Y.-J. Kang, NONLINEAR GEOMETRIC, MATERIAL AND TIME-DEPENDENT ANALYSIS OF REINFORCED AND PRESTRESSED CONCRETE FRAMES. University of California, Berkeley, 1977. [30] Y.-J. Kang and A. C. Scordelis, "Nonlinear analysis of prestressed concrete frames," Journal of the structural division, vol. 106, no. 2, pp. 445-462, 1980. [31] A. R. Mari, Nonlinear geometric, material and time dependent analysis of three dimensional reinforced and prestressed concrete frames. Department of Civil Engineering, University of California, 1984. [32] Y.-J. Kang and A. C. Scordelis, SPCFRAME: Computer program for nonlinear segmental analysis of planar prestressed concrete frames. Department of Civil Engineering, University of California, 1989. [33] M. Elbadry, A. Ghali, and R. B. Gayed, "Deflection control of prestressed box girder bridges," Journal of Bridge Engineering, vol. 19, no. 5, p. 04013027, 2014. [34] T. Guo, Z. Chen, S. Lu, and R. Yao, "Monitoring and analysis of long-term prestress losses in post-tensioned concrete beams," Measurement, vol. 122, pp. 573-581, 2018. [35] L. A. Caro, J. R. Martí-Vargas, and P. Serna, "Prestress losses evaluation in prestressed concrete prismatic specimens," Eng. Struct., vol. 48, pp. 704-715, 2013. [36] R. D. RECOMMENDATION, "Model B4 for Creep, Drying Shrinkage and Autogenous Shrinkage of Normal and High-Strength Concretes with Multi-Decade Applicability1." [37] T. Lou, S. M. Lopes, and A. V. Lopes, "A finite element model to simulate long-term behavior of prestressed concrete girders," Finite Elements in Analysis and Design, vol. 81, pp. 48-56, 2014. [38] A. C. (ACI), "Guide for modeling and calculating shrinkage and creep in hardened concrete.," Farmington Hills, MI., 2008: ACI Report 209.2R-08. [39] A. S. Nowak, "Calibration of LRFD bridge design code," 0077-5614, 1999. [40] C. E.-I. d. Béton, CEB-FIP model code 1990: Design code. Thomas Telford Publishing, 1993. [41] 陸景文、陳振川、詹穎雯, "台灣地區混凝土材料乾縮潛變行為與彈性模數資料庫之建立與應用," presented at the 中華民國第六屆結構工程研討會, 墾丁, 2002, 第C50篇. [42] 陳振川, 廖文正, 劉庭愷, and 秦維邑, "台灣混凝土潛變收縮資料庫建置及特質分析," 結構工程, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 103-116, 2018. [43] 劉庭愷 and 陳振川, "台灣混凝土變形預測模式 B4-TW 建置 (一): 基本潛變, 乾燥潛變與總潛變," 結構工程, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 43-64, 2018. [44] 秦維邑 and 陳振川, "台灣混凝土變形預測模式 B4-TW 建置 (二): 乾縮, 自體收縮與總收縮," 結構工程, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 65-86, 2018. [45] 宋裕祺, 張國鎮, 陳俊仲, 李政寬, 洪曉慧, and 蘇進國, "橋梁監測與結構健康診斷", 土木水利, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 22-29, 2018, doi: 10.6653/MoCICHE.201810_45(5).0003. [46] 李政寬, "光柵感測技術在橋梁安全監測與管理上的初步應用", 土木水利, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 53-57, 2016, doi: 10.6653/MoCICHE.201602_43(1).0011. [47] 紀志松, "從無到有的橋梁安全監測", 三聯技術, no. 100, pp. 28-31, 2016. [48] 張嘉峰, 邱信諺, 賴澄燦, and 鄭丁興, "橋梁健診系統建置與評估", 土木水利, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 34-40, 2016, doi: 10.6653/MoCICHE.201602_43(1).0008. [49] 李政寬, 陳俊仲, 洪曉慧, 宋裕祺, 李路生, and 陳君隆, "五楊高架橋梁車載試驗及其光纖式長期監測系統建置研究" in "103年度國家地震工程研究中心研究成果報告" 台北市, 2014. [50] 李政寬 and 許家銓, "應用光纖沉陷計於地震震損橋梁連續兩年的觀測成果與討論" in "108年度國家地震工程研究中心研究成果報告," 台北市, 2019. [51] ASTM, "Standard specification for low-relaxation, seven-wire steel strand for prestressed concrete," 2016: ASTM West Conshohocken, PA. [52] D. D. Magura, M. A. Sozen, and C. P. Siess, "A study of stress relaxation in prestressing reinforcement," University of Illinois Engineering Experiment Station. College of …, 1962. [53] 臺灣邁達斯技術部, "建模助手-懸臂工法(FCM)橋梁施工階段分析." [54] 臺灣邁達斯技術部, "使用一般功能做懸臂工法橋梁施工階段分析." [55] 歐昱辰, 預力混凝土設計. 台北市, 2021. [56] CNS 3801 混凝土圓柱試體劈裂抗張強度試驗法, 2008. [57] AutoCAD 2020. (2020). [58] 道路交通安全規則, 交通部, 2022. [59] 高健鈞, "應用台灣收縮與潛變預測公式於長跨距預力混凝土橋梁及拱壩壩體長期分析" 碩士論文, 土木工程學系, 國立台灣大學, 台北市, 2021. [60] J. M. Kulicki, Z. Prucz, C. M. Clancy, D. R. Mertz, and A. S. Nowak, "Updating the calibration report for AASHTO LRFD code," Final Rep. for National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP), vol. 186, pp. 20-7, 2007. [61] G. W. Washa and P. Fluck, "Effect of compressive reinforcement on the plastic flow of reinforced concrete beams," in Journal Proceedings, 1952, vol. 49, no. 10, pp. 89-108. [62] P. Arias et al., "Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group14 I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Technical Summary," 2021. [63] C. A. Tracker, "Warming projections global update," Climate Analytics and New Climate Institute. Climateactiontracker. org, 2021. | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/87571 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 國內外皆有案例顯示長跨度預力混凝土箱形橋梁之長期撓度有超量問題,此疑慮會影響橋梁之安全性與使用性,故一直是工程界關注的重點與待解決的課題。因此,針對此議題本研究希望能發展預測長跨度預力混凝土箱形橋梁長期撓度之分析方法,建立全橋數值模型進行施工階段分析,並以監測資料與分析結果比較,以驗證此方法之正確性。 先前有研究顯示,潛變與收縮為長期撓度主要的來源,因此在橋梁分析中採用正確的潛變收縮材料模型將會對分析結果的準確性有決定性的影響。基於先前研究的驗證,認為本土化潛變收縮材料模型B4TW(2020)更貼近台灣本土的潛變收縮行為,本研究採用其與著名國外潛變收縮材料模型AASHTO(2007)與CEB-FIP(2010)進行比較,再次驗證B4TW(2020)是與台灣本土潛變收縮行為更為接近的材料模型。雖然beam-type模型在某些細部結構桿件的模擬上未能完全如實模擬,但本研究的目標為了解全橋結構行為,因此採用beam-type的3D有限元素分析建立數值模型。在了解全橋行為後,能針對有疑慮的細部桿件進行更細節的分析。過去的預力橋梁相關研究亦顯示,活載重與溫度效應不容忽視,但僅有研究提出溫度對長期撓度造成的大略趨勢,故本研究亦針對此二因素對長期撓度與斷面應力所造成的影響進行更詳細的分析與討論。準確、高可靠度的監測資料亦為本研究得以驗證模型正確性的一大重點,因此本文亦介紹了目前兩座橋梁所採用的現地監測系統。 本研究使用商用軟體模擬國內某兩座長跨度預力混凝土橋梁,分別是採用中央鉸接的預力箱型橋梁與中央為連續的預力箱型橋梁,亦代表台灣早期與現代的預力混凝土橋梁,且此兩座橋梁皆有完整的現地監測資料得以與分析結果進行比對驗證。採用兩座橋梁的目的是為了驗證本文所採用之分析分法是適用於不同邊界條件形式的橋梁。本研究依照設計圖與施工報告,模擬該二橋梁的幾何、邊界條件、各種載重以及生命週期中各項調整與補強。分析內容除了長期撓度外,本研究亦利用經撓度驗證後的模型,提出斷面應力和有效預力的分析結果,並探討活載重與溫度效應對於橋梁之長期撓度和斷面應力之影響。最終提出完工50年及完工100年後的長期撓度、斷面應力、有效預力預測分析結果。 由分析之長期撓度結果發現,模擬所採用之潛變收縮模型對橋梁長期撓度的影響甚鉅。在本研究所使用的三種潛變收縮模型中,台灣本土化潛變收縮模型B4TW的預測結果與截至目前為止的監測資料非常接近,在有鉸接的橋梁中平均誤差為24%、無鉸接的橋梁平均誤差約為12%,而其他著名的潛變收縮模型結果則皆有低估長期撓度之現象,誤差達到近80%,因此再次驗證B4TW(2020)能夠更精準地捕捉台灣在地的潛變收縮現象。斷面應力經分析,A橋梁在剛完工、完工50年及完工100年時部分結構桿件有些許應力超量,但目前現地監測顯示未有危險之疑慮,B橋梁則未有應力超量的情形出現。本研究分析A橋梁的車流量資料,使用一假定之活載重做為長期恆載,發現考量活載重對增加長期撓度預測的精準度有助益。本研究亦利用B橋梁有完整溫度監測資料的優勢,探討溫度效應對於撓度造成的影響,若將溫度所造成之撓度疊加,可見隨季節起伏之趨勢吻合,更能將長期撓度的平均誤差由12%降至5%。關於其震盪之幅度,約有90%的撓度震盪能控制在20%內。有效預力的分析中可以看到剛完工至完工50年間預力損失率達到10%,但完工50年至完工100年間的預力損失量僅有1%至5%,顯示預力損失至完工50年後已趨穩定。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Excessive long-term deflection has been frequently seen on prestressed concrete box girder bridges worldwide. This is a concern for the safety and serviceability of bridges. Thus the engineering industry attempts to research and resolve this problem. Against this issue, this study aims to develop an analysis method to predict the long-term deflection of prestressed concrete box girder bridges in Taiwan. Numerical models of the bridges were built to do construction stage analysis. To verify the reliability of the numerical models, the simulation results obtained from the numerical model were compared with in-situ monitoring data. According to previous research, the creep and shrinkage behavior of concrete accounts for a large proportion of long-term deflection. As a result, applying a precise creep and shrinkage model plays a decisive role in simulating the long-term deflection accurately. Being verified by earlier research, a local creep and shrinkage model, B4TW(2020), could capture creep and shrinkage behavior in Taiwan more precisely. This inference was confirmed in this study by comparing with the results applying AASHTO(2007) and CEB-FIP(2010), which are the most used creep and shrinkage models in the US and Europe. In the past research, beam-type numerical models and solid-type numerical models were both used. Although there might be difficulties simulating all of the geometrical details on the beam-type models, beam-type models were adopted in this research. The main reason is that this research focuses on the behavior of the whole bridge rather than elements. 3D models could provide further research after having a comprehensive understanding of the behavior of whole bridges. The effect of live loads and the effect of temperature are also two important variables to long-term deflection. However, there was only research related to the temperature effect with rough trends. In this research, the effects of live loads and temperature on deflection and stress were studied and discussed. Being able to compare the analysis results with in situ monitoring data is also a highlight of this research. To confirm the monitoring data was correct, the monitoring systems in situ were introduced in this research. Two domestic prestressed concrete box girder bridge models were chosen and were built by commercial software. Two bridges consist of two cantilevers connecting in the midspan. One of the bridges was connected by a horizontally sliding hinge, while another was continuously connected. These two types of prestressed concrete box girder bridges also represented the characteristic of the early period and modern period in Taiwan, respectively. Two bridges were chosen in order to prove that the analysis method adopted in this research is suitable for different types of prestressed concrete bridges. Moreover, these two bridges have been monitored since the completion. The thorough monitoring data provides us the evidence to verify the reliability of the models. According to the design layout and the construction record, geometry, boundary conditions, loading, and adjustment during the life cycle were simulated in the models in detail. First, simulation results of long-term deflection were proposed and confirmed with in situ monitoring data. Second, results of stresses, effective prestresses, effect of live load, and effect of temperature on long-term deflection and stresses were also discussed. Last, the results at 50 years and 100 years after construction were shown at the end of this study. The simulation results show that the adopted creep and shrinkage models have significant impact to the long-term deflection simulation results. Among three types of creep and shrinkage models, the local model, B4TW(2020), had the closest results compared to in situ monitoring data. The average error of the bridge with a hinge at midspan was about 23%, while the continuous bridge was about 12%. Creep and shrinkage models from foreign codes underestimated the long-term deflection with an error of 80%. In this research, B4TW(2020) is proved to be able to capture the creep and shrinkage behavior in Taiwan more precisely than others. As for stress, the bridge with a hinge at midspan had excessive amounts of stresses in some specific areas no matter at the completion of bridge construction, and 50 and 100 years after the completion. However, based on in situ observation, there are no danger concerns currently. On the other hand, no excessive amounts of stresses occurred on the bridge which is continuous. The live load traffic statistics of the bridge with a hinge at midspan were analyzed and an amount of live load was assumed as long-term dead load due to heavy traffic during the off-peak period. Considering live load does help to improve the accuracy of prediction of long-term deflection. The continuously connected bridge has thorough history data of temperature during the life cycle. The effect of temperature on deflection was analyzed and discussed in this study. By including the deflection due to temperature with long-term deflection, the simulation results fit the fluctuated trends along with seasons. Moreover, the average error of deflections could be reduced from 12% to 5%. Regarding the amplitude, 90% of the data points are within 20%. As for the analysis of effective prestress, there was 10% of prestress losses during completion to 50 years after construction. Nevertheless, there was only 1% to 5% of prestress losses during 50 years to 100 years after construction. It is proved that prestress losses become steady after 50 years since completion. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2023-06-20T16:07:41Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2023-06-20T16:07:41Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員審定書 i 謝辭 ii 摘要 iii Abstract v 目錄 viii 圖目錄 xiii 表目錄 xviii 第一章 緒論 1 1.1 研究背景與目的 1 1.2 研究方法 5 1.3 研究架構 5 第二章 文獻回顧 7 2.1 預力混凝土箱型橋梁分析與模擬 7 2.1.1 時間依存性函數 7 2.1.2 活載重 9 2.1.3 溫度效應 9 2.1.4 分析方法 10 2.2 長期撓度與預力損失控制 12 2.2.1 長期撓度 12 2.2.2 預力損失 13 2.3 材料潛變收縮模型的演變 14 2.3.1 Model B3 14 2.3.2 Model B4 15 2.3.3 Model B4-TW 15 2.4 預力混凝土箱梁橋監測系統 16 2.4.1 傳統式電子監測系統 17 2.4.2 光纖式沉陷計 17 第三章 A橋梁資訊 19 3.1 橋梁組成構件 19 3.1.1 橋梁幾何資訊 19 3.1.2 墩柱與基腳 20 3.1.3 橋面大梁 23 3.1.4 中央鉸接構造 24 3.2 材料資訊 26 3.2.1 混凝土 26 3.2.2 鋼絞線 26 3.3 主橋施工順序 26 3.4 鋼腱資訊 28 3.5 縱坡改善 36 3.6 監測系統 37 第四章 B橋梁資訊 40 4.1 橋梁組成構件 40 4.1.1 橋梁幾何資訊 40 4.1.2 墩柱與基腳 42 4.1.3 橋面大梁 44 4.2 材料資訊 44 4.2.1 混凝土 44 4.2.2 鋼絞線 45 4.3 主橋施工順序 45 4.4 鋼腱資訊 46 4.5 監測系統 50 第五章 數值模型建立與分析 51 5.1 分析程式 51 5.2 材料參數 51 5.2.1 混凝土 51 5.2.2 鋼絞線 53 5.3 斷面資料 53 5.3.1 上部結構 53 5.3.2 下部結構 55 5.4 邊界條件設定 56 5.4.1 A橋梁 56 5.4.2 B橋梁 58 5.5 載重設定 59 5.5.1 自重 59 5.5.2 混凝土濕重 60 5.5.3 工作車重 61 5.5.4 鋼腱載重 62 5.5.5 長期恆載 75 5.5.6 縱坡調整 75 5.5.7 活載重 76 5.5.8 溫度載重 79 5.6 施工階段建模流程 80 5.6.1 A橋梁 81 5.6.2 B橋梁 83 5.7 模型桿件編號 85 5.7.1 A橋梁 85 5.7.2 B橋梁 87 5.8 潛變與收縮模型設定 87 5.8.1 Model B4TW(2020) 87 5.8.2 Model CEB-FIP 2010 100 5.8.3 Model AASHTO 2007 104 第六章 A橋梁分析結果、預測分析與討論 106 6.1 長期撓度 106 6.1.1 潛變收縮模型 107 6.1.2 邊界條件 109 6.1.3 變位來源探討 113 6.1.4 誤差來源探討 119 6.2 斷面應力 119 6.2.1 剛完工斷面應力 120 6.2.2 完工50年後斷面應力 122 6.2.3 完工100年後斷面應力 124 6.2.4 來源分析 125 6.3 活載重 137 6.3.1 長期撓度 138 6.3.2 斷面應力 139 6.4 有效預力 143 6.4.1 剛施拉預留鋼腱後 143 6.4.2 完工50年後 150 6.4.3 完工100年後 157 第七章 B橋梁之分析結果、預測分析與討論 165 7.1 長期撓度 165 7.1.1 分析結果 165 7.1.2 預測分析 168 7.2 斷面應力 169 7.2.1 分析結果 169 7.2.2 預測分析 171 7.2.3 來源分析 173 7.3 溫度效應 179 7.3.1 長期撓度 179 7.3.2 斷面應力 183 7.4 有效預力 189 7.4.1 分析結果 189 7.4.2 預測分析 189 第八章 結論與建議 194 參考文獻 197 附錄 202 | - |
dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
dc.title | 預力混凝土箱型橋梁長期撓度預測 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Long-Term Deflection Prediction of Prestressed Concrete Box Girder Bridges | en |
dc.type | Thesis | - |
dc.date.schoolyear | 111-1 | - |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 劉光晏;宋欣泰;林子剛 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Kuang-Yen Liu;Shin-Tai Song;Tzu-Kang Lin | en |
dc.subject.keyword | 預力橋梁,Midas Civil,長跨度橋梁,長期撓度,潛變收縮模型,溫度載重,車輛載重, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Prestressed Concrete Bridges,Midas Civil,Long-span Bridges,Long-term deflection,Creep and Shrinkage Model,Temperature Load,Live Load, | en |
dc.relation.page | 202 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202202845 | - |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | - |
dc.date.accepted | 2022-10-06 | - |
dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | - |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 土木工程學系 | - |
dc.date.embargo-lift | 2027-09-12 | - |
顯示於系所單位: | 土木工程學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-111-1.pdf 此日期後於網路公開 2027-09-12 | 20.27 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。