請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/87445完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 陳炳宇 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Bing-Yu Chen | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 廖方盈 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Fang-Ying Liao | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-06-07T16:04:12Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2023-11-10 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2023-06-07 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2022 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2002-01-01 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | [1] A. A. Abeyta and C. Routledge. Fountain of youth: The impact of nostalgia on youthfulness and implications for health. Self and Identity, 15(3):356–369, 2016. [2] A. A. Abeyta, C. Routledge, and S. Kaslon. Combating loneliness with nostalgia: nostalgic feelings attenuate negative thoughts and motivations associated with loneliness. Frontiers in psychology, 11:1219, 2020. [3] P. A. Andersen, L. K. Guerrero, and S. M. Jones. Nonverbal behavior in intimate interactions and intimate relationships. 2006. [4] R. Armitage and L. B. Nellums. Covid-19 and the consequences of isolating the elderly. The Lancet Public Health, 5(5):e256, 2020. [5] A. Aron, E. Melinat, E. N. Aron, R. D. Vallone, and R. J. Bator. The experimental generation of interpersonal closeness: A procedure and some preliminary findings. Personality and social psychology bulletin, 23(4):363–377, 1997. [6] J. N. Bailenson, N. Yee, D. Merget, and R. Schroeder. The effect of behavioral realism and form realism of real-time avatar faces on verbal disclosure, nonverbal disclosure, emotion recognition, and copresence in dyadic interaction. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 15(4):359–372, 2006. [7] S. Baker, R. M. Kelly, J. Waycott, R. Carrasco, R. Bell, Z. Joukhadar, T. Hoang, E. Ozanne, and F. Vetere. School’s back: Scaffolding reminiscence in social virtual reality with older adults. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 4(CSCW3):1–25, 2021. [8] S. Baker, J. Waycott, R. Carrasco, R. M. Kelly, A. J. Jones, J. Lilley, B. Dow, F. Batchelor, T. Hoang, and F. Vetere. Avatar-mediated communication in social vr: an in-depth exploration of older adult interaction in an emerging communication platform. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 1–13, 2021. [9] K. I. Batcho. Nostalgia: A psychological perspective. Perceptual and motor skills, 80(1):131–143, 1995. [10] F. Biocca, C. Harms, and J. Gregg. The networked minds measure of social presence: Pilot test of the factor structure and concurrent validity. In 4th annual international workshop on presence, Philadelphia, PA, pages 1–9, 2001. [11] E. J. Boothby, G. Cooney, G. M. Sandstrom, and M. S. Clark. The liking gap in conversations: Do people like us more than we think? Psychological science, 29(11):1742–1756, 2018. [12] J. K. Burgoon and D. A. Newton. Applying a social meaning model to relational message interpretations of conversational involvement: Comparing observer and participant perspectives. Southern Journal of Communication, 56(2):96–113, 1991. [13] V. Clarke, V. Braun, and N. Hayfield. Thematic analysis. Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods, 222(2015):248, 2015. [14] W. J. Conover. Practical nonparametric statistics, volume 350. john wiley & sons, 1999. [15] R. L. Daft and R. H. Lengel. Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management science, 32(5):554–571, 1986. [16] R. L. Daft and J. C. Wiginton. Language and organization. Academy of management Review, 4(2):179–191, 1979. [17] W. W. Daniel. Kruskal–wallis one-way analysis of variance by ranks. Applied nonparametric statistics, pages 226–234, 1990. [18] C. S. Fichten, V. Tagalakis, D. Judd, J. Wright, and R. Amsel. Verbal and nonverbal communication cues in daily conversations and dating. The Journal of Social Psychology, 132(6):751–769, 1992. [19] K. E. Fisher, C. F. Landry, and C. Naumer. Social spaces, casual interactions, meaningful exchanges:’information ground’characteristics based on the college student experience. Information Research, 12(2):12–2, 2007. [20] G. Freeman and D. Maloney. Body, avatar, and me: The presentation and perception of self in social virtual reality. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 4(CSCW3):1–27, 2021. [21] G. Freeman, S. Zamanifard, D. Maloney, and A. Adkins. My body, my avatar: How people perceive their avatars in social virtual reality. In Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 1–8, 2020. [22] S. Gammon and G. Ramshaw. Distancing from the present: Nostalgia and leisure in lockdown. Leisure Sciences, 43(1-2):131–137, 2021. [23] M. Granovetter. Problems of explanation in economic sociology. Networks and organizations: Structure, form, and action, pages 25–56, 1992. [24] C. Griffiths. Using grounded theory to analyze qualitative observational data that is obtained by video recording. Grounded Theory Review, 12(1), 2013. [25] R. Hampel. Making meaning online: Computer-mediated communication for language learning. 2014. [26] D. Hepperle, C. F. Purps, J. Deuchler, and M. Wölfel. Aspects of visual avatar appearance: self-representation, display type, and uncanny valley. The Visual Computer, 38(4):1227–1244, 2022. [27] R. Hooi and H. Cho. Avatar-driven self-disclosure: The virtual me is the actual me. Computers in Human Behavior, 39:20–28, 2014. [28] F. Ibarra, G. Kowalik, M. Baez, R. Nielek, N. Lau, L. Cernuzzi, and F. Casati. Design challenges for reconnecting in later life: A qualitative study. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Conference Companion Publication on Designing Interactive Systems, pages 141–146, 2018. [29] C. Jennett, A. L. Cox, P. Cairns, S. Dhoparee, A. Epps, T. Tijs, and A. Walton. Measuring and defining the experience of immersion in games. International journal of human-computer studies, 66(9):641–661, 2008. [30] A. J. Johnson, J. A. Becker, E. A. Craig, E. S. Gilchrist, and M. M. Haigh. Changes in friendship commitment: Comparing geographically close and long-distance youngadult friendships. Communication Quarterly, 57(4):395–415, 2009. [31] M. Jonas, S. Said, D. Yu, C. Aiello, N. Furlo, and D. Zytko. Towards a taxonomy of social vr application design. In Extended Abstracts of the Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play Companion Extended Abstracts, pages 437444, 2019. [32] S.-H. Kang, J. H. Watt, and S. K. Ala. Communicators’ perceptions of social presence as a function of avatar realism in small display mobile communication devices. In Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2008), pages 147–147. IEEE, 2008. [33] M. Kardas, A. Kumar, and N. Epley. Overly shallow?: Miscalibrated expectations create a barrier to deeper conversation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2021. [34] A. Kumar and N. Epley. It＇s surprisingly nice to hear you: Misunderstanding the impact of communication media can lead to suboptimal choices of how to connect with others. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 150(3):595, 2021. [35] W. S. Lasecki, M. Gordon, D. Koutra, M. F. Jung, S. P. Dow, and J. P. Bigham. Glance: Rapidly coding behavioral video with the crowd. In Proceedings of the 27th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, pages 551–562, 2014. [36] S. Lee, A. El Ali, M. Wijntjes, and P. Cesar. Understanding and designing avatar biosignal visualizations for social virtual reality entertainment. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 1–15, 2022. [37] S. Lee, Y. Sun, and E. Thiry. Do you believe in love at first sight: effects of media richness via modalities on viewers’ overall impressions of online dating profiles. In Proceedings of the 2011 iConference, pages 332–339. 2011. [38] D. Z. Levin, J. Walter, and J. K. Murnighan. Dormant ties: The value of reconnecting. Organization Science, 22(4):923–939, 2011. [39] D. Z. Levin, J. Walter, and J. K. Murnighan. The power of reconnection how dormant ties can surprise you. MIT Sloan Management Review, 52(3):45, 2011. [40] J. Li, Y. Kong, T. Röggla, F. De Simone, S. Ananthanarayan, H. De Ridder, A. El Ali, and P. Cesar. Measuring and understanding photo sharing experiences in social virtual reality. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 1–14, 2019. [41] Q. Liu, Y. Wu, Y. Xiao, W. Fu, Z. Zhuo, C. C. K. van den Bosch, Q. Huang, and S. Lan. More meaningful, more restorative? linking local landscape characteristics and place attachment to restorative perceptions of urban park visitors. Landscape and Urban Planning, 197:103763, 2020. [42] Z. Liu, P. Luo, X. Wang, and X. Tang. Deep learning face attributes in the wild. In Proceedings of International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), December 2015. [43] J. Looy, C. Courtois, M. De Vocht, and L. Marez. Player identification in online games: Validation of a scale for measuring identification in mmogs. Media Psychology - MEDIA PSYCHOL, 15:197–221, 05 2012. [44] D. Maloney and G. Freeman. Falling asleep together: What makes activities in social virtual reality meaningful to users. In Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play, pages 510–521, 2020. [45] D. Maloney, G. Freeman, and D. Y. Wohn. ” talking without a voice” understanding non-verbal communication in social virtual reality. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 4(CSCW2):1–25, 2020. [46] D. Maloney, S. Zamanifard, and G. Freeman. Anonymity vs. familiarity: Selfdisclosure and privacy in social virtual reality. In 26th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology, pages 1–9, 2020. [47] M. Marinussen and A. de Rooij. Being yourself to be creative: How self-similar avatars can support the generation of original ideas in virtual environments. In Proceedings of the 2019 on Creativity and Cognition, pages 285–293. 2019. [48] J. McVeigh-Schultz, A. Kolesnichenko, and K. Isbister. Shaping pro-social interaction in vr: an emerging design framework. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 1–12, 2019. [49] Y. Mei, J. Li, H. de Ridder, and P. Cesar. Cakevr: A social virtual reality (vr) tool for co-designing cakes. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 1–14, 2021. [50] G. Mollenhorst, B. Volker, and H. Flap. Changes in personal relationships: How social contexts affect the emergence and discontinuation of relationships. Social Networks, 37:65–80, 2014. [51] F. Moustafa and A. Steed. A longitudinal study of small group interaction in social virtual reality. In Proceedings of the 24th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology, pages 1–10, 2018. [52] R. E. Nisbett and T. D. Wilson. The halo effect: Evidence for unconscious alteration of judgments. Journal of personality and social psychology, 35(4):250, 1977. [53] K. L. Nowak. The influence of anthropomorphism and agency on social judgment in virtual environments. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 9(2):JCMC925, 2004. [54] K. L. Nowak and F. Biocca. The effect of the agency and anthropomorphism on users’ sense of telepresence, copresence, and social presence in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 12(5):481–494, 2003. [55] K. L. Nowak and C. Rauh. The influence of the avatar on online perceptions of anthropomorphism, androgyny, credibility, homophily, and attraction. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(1):153–178, 2005. [56] R. Nowland, E. A. Necka, and J. T. Cacioppo. Loneliness and social internet use: pathways to reconnection in a digital world? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(1):70–87, 2018. [57] N. Pennington. The maintenance of dormant and commemorative ties by young adults through social media. Southern Communication Journal, 86(3):244–255, 2021. [58] K. Quinn. We haven’t talked in 30 years! relationship reconnection and internet use at midlife. Information, Communication & Society, 16(3):397–420, 2013. [59] H. Rainie and B. Wellman. Networked: The new social operating system, volume 10. Mit Press Cambridge, MA, 2012. [60] A. Ramirez Jr, E. M. Sumner, and J. Spinda. The relational reconnection function of social network sites. New Media & Society, 19(6):807–825, 2017. [61] R. Ratan and B. S. Hasler. Playing well with virtual classmates: relating avatar design to group satisfaction. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing, pages 564–573, 2014. [62] W. K. Rawlins. Being there and growing apart: Sustaining friendships during adulthood. Communication and relational maintenance, pages 275–294, 1994. [63] H. T. Reis, H. T. Reis, C. M. Judd, et al. Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology. Cambridge University Press, 2000. [64] R. Rivu, Y. Zhou, R. Welsch, V. Mäkelä, and F. Alt. When friends become strangers: Understanding the influence of avatar gender on interpersonal distance in virtual reality. In IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, pages 234–250. Springer, 2021. [65] T. Roulet and B. Laker. Now is the time to reconnect with your dormant network. MIT Sloan Management Review, 2020. [66] C. Routledge, T. Wildschut, C. Sedikides, and J. Juhl. Nostalgia as a resource for psychological health and well-being. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7(11):808–818, 2013. [67] M. Saveski, F. Kooti, S. Morelli Vitousek, C. Diuk, B. Bartlett, and L. A. Adamic. Social catalysts: Characterizing people who spark conversations among others. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 5(CSCW2):1–20, 2021. [68] T. Schubert, F. Friedmann, and H. Regenbrecht. The experience of presence: Factor analytic insights. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 10(3):266–281, 2001. [69] V. Schwind. Implications of the uncanny valley of avatars and virtual characters for human-computer interaction. 2018. [70] V. Schwind, K. Wolf, and N. Henze. Avoiding the uncanny valley in virtual character design. interactions, 25(5):45–49, 2018. [71] P. Siriaraya and C. S. Ang. Recreating living experiences from past memories through virtual worlds for people with dementia. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 3977–3986, 2014. [72] M. Slater, M. Usoh, and A. Steed. Depth of presence in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 3(2):130–144, 1994. [73] H. J. Smith and M. Neff. Communication behavior in embodied virtual reality. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, pages 1–12, 2018. [74] C. Soukup. Building a theory of multi-media cmc: An analysis, critique and integration of computer-mediated communication theory and research. New Media & Society, 2(4):407–425, 2000. [75] S. Sprecher. Closeness and other affiliative outcomes generated from the fast friends procedure: A comparison with a small-talk task and unstructured self-disclosure and the moderating role of mode of communication. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 38(5):1452–1471, 2021. [76] M. Sra, A. Mottelson, and P. Maes. Your place and mine: Designing a shared vr experience for remotely located users. In Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference, pages 85–97, 2018. [77] M. Steen, M. Eriksson, J. Kort, and P. Ljungstrand. D8. 8 user evaluations of ta2 concepts. Public Deliverable from the EU project, TA2: Together Anywhere Together Anytime (ICT-214793), 2012. [78] J. Steuer. Defining virtual reality: Dimensions determining telepresence. Journal of communication, 42(4):73–93, 1992. [79] K. S. Thach, R. Lederman, and J. Waycott. How older adults respond to the use of virtual reality for enrichment: a systematic review. In 32nd Australian Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, pages 303–313, 2020. [80] D. T. Van Bel, K. C. Smolders, W. A. IJsselsteijn, and Y. De Kort. Social connectedness: concept and measurement. In Intelligent Environments 2009, pages 67–74. IOS Press, 2009. [81] B. Van Der Heide, E. M. Schumaker, A. M. Peterson, and E. B. Jones. The proteus effect in dyadic communication: Examining the effect of avatar appearance in computer-mediated dyadic interaction. Communication Research, 40(6):838–860, 2013. [82] D. Walker and F. Myrick. Grounded theory: An exploration of process and procedure. Qualitative health research, 16(4):547–559, 2006. [83] J. Walter, D. Z. Levin, and J. K. Murnighan. Reconnection choices: Selecting the most valuable (vs. most preferred) dormant ties. Organization Science, 26(5):14471465, 2015. [84] C. Y. Wang, M. Sakashita, U. Ehsan, J. Li, and A. S. Won. Again, together: Socially reliving virtual reality experiences when separated. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 1–12, 2020. [85] J. Weiss, L. E. Lawton, and C. S. Fischer. Life course transitions and changes in network ties among younger and older adults. Advances in Life Course Research, 52:100478, 2022. [86] T. Wildschut and C. Sedikides. Benefits of nostalgia in vulnerable populations. European Review of Social Psychology, pages 1–48, 2022. [87] T. Wildschut, C. Sedikides, J. Arndt, and C. Routledge. Nostalgia: content, triggers, functions. Journal of personality and social psychology, 91(5):975, 2006. [88] T. Wildschut, C. Sedikides, C. Routledge, J. Arndt, and F. Cordaro. Nostalgia as a repository of social connectedness: the role of attachment-related avoidance. Journal of personality and social psychology, 98(4):573, 2010. [89] B. G. Witmer and M. J. Singer. Measuring presence in virtual environments: A presence questionnaire. Presence, 7(3):225–240, 1998. [90] J. Xiao, K. A. Ehinger, J. Hays, A. Torralba, and A. Oliva. Sun database: Exploring a large collection of scene categories. International Journal of Computer Vision, 119(1):3–22, 2016. [91] Y. Xiao, F. J. Seagull, C. F. Mackenzie, and K. Klein. Adaptive leadership in trauma resuscitation teams: a grounded theory approach to video analysis. Cognition, Technology & Work, 6(3):158–164, 2004. [92] L. Yang, D. Holtz, S. Jaffe, S. Suri, S. Sinha, J. Weston, C. Joyce, N. Shah, K. Sherman, B. Hecht, et al. The effects of remote work on collaboration among information workers. Nature human behaviour, 6(1):43–54, 2022. [93] S. W. Yang, S. M. Soltis, J. R. Ross, and G. J. Labianca. Dormant tie reactivation as an affiliative coping response to stressors during the covid-19 crisis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 106(4):489, 2021. [94] T. Yeleswarapu, P. Nair, and N. Rangaswamy. “should we meet irl?”: Gauging matches in virtual reality. In Proceedings of 19th European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work. European Society for Socially Embedded Technologies (EUSSET), 2021. [95] S. Zamanifard and G. Freeman. ” the togetherness that we crave” experiencing social vr in long distance relationships. In Conference Companion Publication of the 2019 on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, pages 438–442, 2019. [96] X. Zhou, C. Sedikides, T. Mo, W. Li, E. K. Hong, and T. Wildschut. The restorative power of nostalgia: Thwarting loneliness by raising happiness during the covid-19 pandemic. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 13(4):803–815, 2022. [97] X. Zhou, C. Sedikides, T. Wildschut, and D.-G. Gao. Counteracting loneliness: On the restorative function of nostalgia. Psychological science, 19(10):1023–1029, 2008. | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/87445 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 重建休眠的友誼有助於人們克服孤獨感並獲得社會支持，這對於個人健康福祉至關重要。隨著全球新冠疫情蔓延，大眾被迫社交隔離，社交虛擬實境的設計透過實現同地體驗與真實互動感來促進更緊密的雙人聯繫。本文探討了社交虛擬實境中的關鍵特徵—虛擬化身相似度 (Avatar Similarity) 與虛擬環境熟悉度 (VE Familiarity)是如何影響、輔助休眠關係的重建。我們共招募了24組受試者進行一項混合方法研究，藉此觀察不同設計的虛擬化身與虛擬環境對於休眠關係的影響。實驗結果顯示高相似度的虛擬化身能提升雙方重新聯繫時的社交親密感。此外，高熟悉度的虛擬環境可以喚醒雙方對相關實體地點的共同回憶，而低熟悉度的虛擬環境可以藉由新奇性引發更多對話。我們歸納並進一步探討這些發現，提出適用於社交虛擬實境的設計建議，期望未來實務上能更有效地恢復休眠友誼。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | The revival of dormant social ties is essential for well-being and helps people to overcome loneliness and acquire social support. With increasing social isolation increasing during the COVID-19 pandemic, social virtual reality has been designed to facilitate dyadic connection through creating co-located experiences and genuine connections. In this paper, we explore how the critical features of social virtual reality platforms can support the reactivation of dormant relationships. We conducted a mixed-methods study with 24 dyads to observe the influence of different avatar- and virtual environment-related features on the dormant-tie pairs. Our results show that highly similar avatars can foster social closeness on reconnection. Furthermore, highly familiar virtual environments can revive shared memory related to familiar physical locations, while those with low familiarity can provide novelty, thus triggering more conversations. We summarize these findings to better inform the design considerations for social virtual reality to revive dormant ties in the future. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2023-06-07T16:04:11Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2023-06-07T16:04:12Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | Verification Letter from the Oral Examination Committee i Acknowledgements ii 中文摘要 v Abstract vi Contents viii List of Figures xi List of Tables xiii Chapter 1 Introduction 1 Chapter 2 Related Work 5 2.1 Revival of Dormant Ties 5 2.2 Social Interaction in Virtual Reality 7 Chapter 3 Experiment Design 8 3.1 Participants 9 3.2 Apparatus and Social VR Platform 9 3.3 Avatar Similarity and Virtual Environment (VE) Familiarity 11 3.3.1 Manipulation of Avatar Similarity 11 3.3.2 Manipulation of VE Familiarity 12 3.4 Task and Procedure 15 3.5 Measurements and Data Analysis 16 3.5.1 Questionnaire 17 3.5.2 Video Coding 17 3.5.3 Interview 18 Chapter 4 Result 19 4.1 Questionnaire Results 20 4.1.1 Effect of Avatar Similarity 20 4.1.2 Effect of VE Familiarity 21 4.1.3 Effect of Avatar Similarity × VE Familiarity 22 4.2 Video Coding Results 22 4.3 Qualitative Findings 23 4.3.1 Avatar-Induced Effects on Dormant Interactions 23 4.3.2 VE-Stimulated Nostalgia and New Memories 26 4.3.3 VR-Enabled Co-Located and Embodied Experience 28 Chapter 5 Discussion 29 5.1 The Effects of Perceived Avatar Similarity in Dormant Ties Interaction 29 5.2 The Effects of VE with Different Levels of Familiarity 31 5.3 Overall Effects of Avatar Similarity and VE Familiarity 32 5.4 Implications for Reviving Dormant Ties with Social VR Platforms 33 5.4.1 Making VR Platforms Responsive to User Contexts 33 5.4.2 Prevent Awkwardness 34 5.4.3 Enhance Intimacy 34 5.4.4 Encourage Conversation Beyond Small Talk 35 5.4.5 Establish Future Reconnection 36 Chapter 6 Limitations and Future Work 37 Chapter 7 Conclusion 39 References 40 Appendix A — Supplement Figures and Tables 53 | - |
| dc.language.iso | en | - |
| dc.subject | 擴增實境 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 電腦中介傳播 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 探索人與系統之實證研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 虛擬實境 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Computer Mediated Communication | en |
| dc.subject | Virtual/Augmented Reality | en |
| dc.subject | Empirical study that tells us about how people use a system | en |
| dc.title | 最熟悉的陌生人：探索社交虛擬實境中虛擬化身與環境之設計用於恢復休眠關係之影響 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Strange Familiars: Exploring the Design of Avatars and Virtual Environments for Reviving Dormant Ties in Social Virtual Reality | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 111-1 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 詹力韋;程芙茵;沈奕超 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Li-Wei Chan;Fu-Yin Cherng;I-Chao Shen | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 電腦中介傳播,虛擬實境,擴增實境,探索人與系統之實證研究, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Computer Mediated Communication,Virtual/Augmented Reality,Empirical study that tells us about how people use a system, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 56 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202204259 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2022-10-11 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 資訊管理學系 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 資訊管理學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-111-1.pdf | 1.5 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。