請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/87249
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 王宏文 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.advisor | Hong-Wung Wang | en |
dc.contributor.author | 黃薏庭 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author | Yi-Ting Huang | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-05-18T16:37:27Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-11-09 | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2023-05-11 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2023 | - |
dc.date.submitted | 2023-02-18 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | 王業立,2021,《比較選舉制度》,台北:五南圖書。
王業立、蘇子喬、石鵬翔,2021,《台、日、韓憲政制度與選舉制度》,台北:五南圖書。 王靖興,2009,〈立法委員的立法問政與選區服務之分析:2000年政黨輪替前後的持續與變遷〉,《台灣政治學刊》,13(2):113-169。 吳重禮,2002,〈SNTV的省思:幣端肇因或是代罪羔羊?〉,《問題與研究》,41(3):45-60。 吳東欽,2008,〈從議事阻撓觀點探討我國中央分立政府運作之影響〉,《臺灣民主季刊》,5(3) :71-120。 黃士豪,2017,〈誰要議題所有權?立法委員立法提案與議題所有權的建立〉,《臺灣民主季刊》,14(1):1-51。 黃紀、王鼎銘、郭銘峰,2008,〈[混合選制] 下選民之一致與分裂投票: 1996 年日本眾議員選舉自民黨選票之分析〉,《選舉研究》,15(2) :1-35。 黃秀端,2003,〈少數政府在國會的困境〉,《台灣政治學刊》,7(2):3-49。 張卿卿,2009,〈競選廣告之效果探討: 以議題所有權策略爲例〉,《中華傳播學刊》,16:93-129。 盛杏湲,2000,〈政黨或選區?立法委員的代表取向與行為〉,《問題與研究》,7(2),37-73。 盛杏湲,2003,〈一致政府與分立政府在時立法機關與行政機關的立法影響力〉,《台灣政治學刊》,7(2),51-105。 盛杏湲,2005,〈選區代表與集體代表:立法委員的代表角色〉,《東吳政治學報》,21:1-40。 盛杏湲,2008,〈政黨的國會領導與凝聚力-2000 年政黨輪替前後的觀察〉, 《臺灣民主季刊》, 5(4),1-46。 盛杏湲,2014,〈從立法提案到立法產出:比較行政院與立法院在立法過程的影響力〉,黃秀端(編)《轉型中的行政與立法關係》,台北:五南圖書,頁23-60。 盛杏湲,2014,〈選制變革前後立委提案的持續與變遷:一個探索性的研究〉, 《臺灣政治學刊》,18(1):73-127。 盛杏湲,2014,〈再探選區服務與立法問政:選制改革前後的比較〉, 《東吳政治學報》,32(2):65-116。 廖育嶒,2013,〈公民監督國會聯盟與國會政治〉,台北:國立政治大學政治學系碩士論文 。 羅清俊,2002,〈立法院常設委員會審本功能之實證研究-委員會資深程度與不分區立委角色的影響〉 Aldrich, J. H., & Rohde, D. W. (2000). The consequences of party organization in the House: The role of the majority and minority parties in conditional party government. In Polarized politics: Congress and the president in a partisan era (pp. 31-72). Boydstun, A. E., Bevan, S., & Thomas III, H. F. (2014). The importance of attention diversity and how to measure it. Policy Studies Journal, 42(2), 173-196. Crosson, J. M., Lorenz, G. M., Volden, C., & Wiseman, A. E. (2018, September). How experienced legislative staff contribute to effective lawmaking. In State of Congressional Capacity Conference. Damore, D. F. (2004). The dynamics of issue ownership in presidential campaigns. Political Research Quarterly, 57(3), 391-397. Fenno, R. F. (1978). Home style: House members in their districts: Pearson College Division. Hobolt, S. B., & De Vries, C. E. (2015). Issue entrepreneurship and multiparty competition. Comparative Political Studies, 48(9), 1159-1185. Huang, C., Kuo, M. F., & Stockton, H. (2016). the Consequences of MMM on Party Systems. NF Batto, C. Huang, AC Tan, & GW Cox, Mixed-Member Electoral Systems in Constitutional Context: Taiwan, Japan, and Beyond, 25-51. Hirano, S. 2006. “Electoral Institutions, Hometowns, and Favored Minorities: Evidence from Japanese Electoral Reforms.” World Politics 59(1):51-82. Jones, B. D., Baumgartner, F. R., & Talbert, J. C. (1993). The destruction of issue monopolies in Congress. American Political Science Review, 87(3), 657-671. Jones, B. D., & Baumgartner, F. R. (2005). The politics of attention: How government prioritizes problems. University of Chicago Press. Jennings, W., Bevan, S., Timmermans, A., Breeman, G., Brouard, S., Chaqués-Bonafont, L., ... & Palau, A. M. (2011). Effects of the core functions of government on the diversity of executive agendas. Comparative Political Studies, 44(8), 1001-1030. Lancaster, T. D. 1986. “Electoral Structures and Pork Barrel Politics.” International Political Science Review 7(1):67-81. Mayhew, D. R. (1974). Congress: The electoral connection (Vol. 26). Yale University Press. Montgomery, J. M., & Nyhan, B. (2017). The effects of congressional staff networks in the us house of representatives. The Journal of Politics, 79(3), 745-761. McKean, M., & Scheiner, E. (2000). Japan's new electoral system:: la plus ça change... Electoral Studies, 19(4), 447-477. Orey, B. D. A., Smooth, W., Adams, K. S., & Harris-Clark, K. (2007). Race and gender matter: Refining models of legislative policy making in state legislatures. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, 28(3-4), 97-119. Petrocik, J. R. (1996). Issue ownership in presidential elections, with a 1980 case study. American journal of political science, 825-850. Pope, J. C., & Woon, J. (2009). Measuring changes in American party reputations, 1939—2004. Political Research Quarterly, 62(4), 653-661. Saint-Germain, M. A. (1989). Does Their Difference Make a Difference? The Impact of Women on Public Policy in Arizona Legislature. Sheng, Shing-yuan (2006). “The Personal Vote-Seeking and the Motivation of Particularistic Benefit Bills in the Taiwanese Legislature.” Paper presented at International Conference on Political Center or Periphery: Legislatures & Parliaments in the 21st Century, Soochow University, Taipei, July 7-8. Walgrave, S., Lefevere, J., & Nuytemans, M. (2009). Issue ownership stability and change: How political parties claim and maintain issues through media appearances. Political Communication, 26(2), 153-172. Workman, S., Shafran, J., & Bark, T. (2017). Problem definition and information provision by federal bureaucrats. Cognitive systems research, 43, 140-152. | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/87249 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 我國在2004年通過第七次憲法修正案後,導致了選舉制度的變革,影響了立法委員的行動誘因與策略,也就可能影響立委的提案行為與數量。本文從立委提案的角度出發,探討立委提案的多樣性,也就是探討委員們所代表的利益或所關心的議題面向。而提案多樣性的重要性在於,現今社會問題多樣且複雜,倘若部分人沒有辦法透過立委將其利益排進政策議程當中,將是代議民主制度下的受害者。而選制改變,亦會影響新選制下所產生的立委,有可能在提案的多樣性上有著不一樣的表現。
本文以第四屆至第九屆區域與不分區立委為觀察對象,並採用跨國政策議程計畫(CAP)為編碼原則,將委員提案進行議題分類,最後透過描述統計與多元迴歸統計進行分析。 本文研究結果發現如下,第一,從整體的角度來看,就每屆而言,全體立委提案多樣性會高於行政院提案多樣性。第二,區域立委相較於不分區立委,有更高的動機去擴張議題領域,因此區域立委的提案多樣性會高於不分區立委的提案多樣性。第三,新選制立委的提案多樣性會高於舊選制立委的提案多樣性,這說明了新選制的立委,相較於舊選制的立委,其在提案議題上,必須追求更多的發揮空間。最後,透過迴歸統計的結果發現,新選制與區域立委這兩者之間的交互作用並沒有呈現顯著結果。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | After the seventh constitutional amendment bill was passed in 2004, our country underwent changes to its electoral system. This has had an impact on the actions, incentives, and strategies of legislators, which could potentially affect the behavior and quantity of proposals put forward by legislators. This article explores the diversity of proposals put forward by legislators, from the perspective of the issues they represent and the interests they care about. The importance of proposal diversity lies in the fact that contemporary social issues are diverse and complex, and those who cannot have their interests represented in policy agendas through legislators will be victims of the representative democratic system. Changes to the electoral system may also have an impact on the diversity of proposals put forward by legislators produced under the new system.
This study focuses on the fourth to ninth regional and non-regional legislative members, and utilizes the Comparative Policy Agenda (CAP) as a coding principle to classify proposals by topic, followed by descriptive statistics and multiple regression analysis. The results of this study are as follows: First, from a comprehensive perspective, the diversity of proposals put forward by all legislative members in each term is higher than that of proposals put forward by the Executive Yuan. Second, regional legislative members are more motivated to expand their areas of discussion than non-regional legislative members, thus resulting in higher proposal diversity among regional legislative members. Third, the proposal diversity of new system legislative members is higher than that of old system legislative members, indicating that new system legislative members must strive for more space to present their proposal issues compared to old system legislative members. Finally, the results of the regression analysis show that the interaction between the new electoral system and regional legislative members did not present a significant result. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2023-05-18T16:37:26Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2023-05-18T16:37:27Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 摘要 I
ABSTRACT II 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究問題 4 第二章 台灣選制改變的介紹 5 第三章 文獻探討 8 第一節 國會議員提案多樣性之重要性 8 第二節 影響國會議員提案之因素 11 第三節 選制改變之影響 15 第四節 我國選制改變對立委 提案多樣性的影響 18 第四章 研究方法 24 第一節 分析單位 24 第二節 變數說明 26 第三節 統計方法 27 第五章 研究結果 28 第一節 行政院提案與全體立委提案的數量與多樣性分析 28 第二節 個別立委提案多樣性分析 32 第三節 迴歸統計分析 37 第六章 結論 41 參考文獻 43 附錄一 跨國政策議程計畫 47 附錄二 提案涉及該子議題的各屆立委數量 52 | - |
dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
dc.title | 立委提案多樣性之分析:論立委選制改變之可能影響 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Analysis of Legislative Proposal Diversity:The Possible Influences of Electoral System Change | en |
dc.type | Thesis | - |
dc.date.schoolyear | 111-1 | - |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 羅清俊;俞振華 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Qing-Jun Luo;Zhen-Hua Yu | en |
dc.subject.keyword | 立法委員,提案,提案多樣性,SNTV,選制改變, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | legislator,proposal,proposal diversity,SNTV,electoral system change, | en |
dc.relation.page | 57 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202300614 | - |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(限校園內公開) | - |
dc.date.accepted | 2023-02-18 | - |
dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | - |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 公共事務研究所 | - |
顯示於系所單位: | 公共事務研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-111-1.pdf 授權僅限NTU校內IP使用(校園外請利用VPN校外連線服務) | 1.35 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。