請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/87220完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 劉奇璋 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Chi-Chang Liu | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 歐書寰 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Shu-Huan Ou | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-05-18T16:26:59Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2023-11-09 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2023-05-11 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2023 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2023-02-16 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Adler, G., Schwartz, J., & Kuskowski, M. (2007). An exploratory study of older adults' participation in civic action. Clinical Gerontologist, 31(2), 65-75.
Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In Action control (pp. 11-39). Springer. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 50(2), 179-211. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (2000). Attitudes and the attitude-behavior relation: Reasoned and automatic processes. European review of social psychology, 11(1), 1-33. American Association of Retired Persons. (2000). AARP survey on lifelong learning. Retrieved from https://assets.aarp.org/rgcenter/general/lifelong.pdf Asghar, H. (2015). The volunteer functions inventory: examination of dimension, scale reliability and correlates. International Journal of Innovative and Applied Research, 3(4), 52-64. Bamberger, Y., & Tal, T. (2007). Learning in a personal context: Levels of choice in a free choice learning environment in science and natural history museums. Science Education, 91(1), 75-95. Bonney, R., Cooper, C. B., Dickinson, J., Kelling, S., Phillips, T., Rosenberg, K. V., & Shirk, J. (2009). Citizen science: a developing tool for expanding science knowledge and scientific literacy. BioScience, 59(11), 977-984. Boulton-Lewis, G. M. (2010). Education and learning for the elderly: Why, how, what. Educational Gerontology, 36(3), 213-228. Bradley, D. B. (1999). A reason to rise each morning: The meaning of volunteering in the lives of older adults. GENERATIONS-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY ON AGING, 23(4), 45-50. Carr, D. C., Fried, L. P., & Rowe, J. W. (2015). Productivity & engagement in an aging America: The role of volunteerism. Daedalus, 144(2), 55-67. Carstensen, L. L. (1987). Age-related changes in social activity. Carstensen, L. L. (1992). Social and emotional patterns in adulthood: support for socioemotional selectivity theory. Psychology and aging, 7(3), 331. Carstensen, L. L., Isaacowitz, D. M., & Charles, S. T. (1999). Taking time seriously: a theory of socioemotional selectivity. American psychologist, 54(3), 165. Chen, L. K. (2007). Older Taiwanese women: Learning and successful aging through volunteering University of Georgia Athens, GA]. Chen, L. K. (2016). Not just helping: What and how older men learn when they volunteer. Educational Gerontology, 42(3), 175-185. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601277.2015.1085786 Choi, L. H. (2003). Factors affecting volunteerism among older adults. JOURNAL OF APPLIED GERONTOLOGY, 22(2), 179-196. https://doi.org/10.1177/0733464803022002001 Clary, E. G., & Snyder, M. (1999). The motivations to volunteer: Theoretical and practical considerations. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8(5), 156-159. Clary, E. G., Snyder, M., Ridge, R. D., Copeland, J., Stukas, A. A., Haugen, J., & Miene, P. (1998). Understanding and assessing the motivations of volunteers: a functional approach. Journal of personality and social psychology, 74(6), 1516. Cohn, J. P. (2008). Citizen science: Can volunteers do real research? BioScience, 58(3), 192-197. Commission of the European Commission. (2001). Making a European area of lifelong learning a reality. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission Retrieved from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2001:0678:FIN:EN:PDF Cooper, C. B., Dickinson, J., Phillips, T., & Bonney, R. (2007). Citizen science as a tool for conservation in residential ecosystems. Ecology and society, 12(2). Dem, E. S., Rodríguez-Labajos, B., Wiemers, M., Ott, J., Hirneisen, N., Bustamante, J. V., Bustamante, M., & Settele, J. (2018). Understanding the relationship between volunteers’ motivations and learning outcomes of Citizen Science in rice ecosystems in the Northern Philippines. Paddy and Water Environment, 16(4), 725-735. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10333-018-0664-9 Dickinson, J. L., Zuckerberg, B., & Bonter, D. N. (2010). Citizen science as an ecological research tool: challenges and benefits. Annual review of ecology, evolution, and systematics, 41, 149-172. Dunlap, R. E. (2008). The New Environmental Paradigm Scale: From Marginality to Worldwide Use. The Journal of Environmental Education, 40(1), 3-18. https://doi.org/10.3200/joee.40.1.3-18 Dunlap, R. E., & Van Liere, K. D. (1978). The “new environmental paradigm”. The Journal of Environmental Education, 9(4), 10-19. Dunlop, L., Clarke, L., & McKelvey-Martin, V. (2019). Free-choice learning in school science: A model for collaboration between formal and informal science educators. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 9(1), 13-28. Esmond, J., & Dunlop, P. (2004). Developing the volunteer motivation inventory to assess the underlying motivational drives of volunteers in Western Australia. In: Citeseer. Eyler, J. (2002). Reflection: Linking service and learning—Linking students and communities. Journal of social issues, 58(3), 517-534. Falk, J., & Storksdieck, M. (2005). Using the contextual model of learning to understand visitor learning from a science center exhibition. Science Education, 89(5), 744-778. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20078 Falk, J. H. (1983). Field trips: A look at environmental effects on learning. Journal of Biological Education, 17(2), 137-142. Falk, J. H., & Dierking, L. D. (2000). Learning from Museum. Visitor Experiences and the Making of Meaning. Walnut Creek. In: CA: AltaMira Press. Falk, J. H., Moussouri, T., & Coulson, D. (1998). The effect of visitors ‘agendas on museum learning. Curator: The Museum Journal, 41(2), 107-120. Flanagan, C., & Levine, P. (2010). Civic engagement and the transition to adulthood. The future of children, 159-179. Friedman, A. J., Allen, S., Campbell, P. B., Dierking, L. D., Flagg, B. N., Garibay, C., & Ucko, D. A. (2008). Framework for evaluating impacts of informal science education projects. Report from a National Science Foundation Workshop. The National Science Foundation, Division of Research on Learning in Formal and Informal Settings, Gkargkavouzi, A., Halkos, G., & Matsiori, S. (2019). Environmental behavior in a private-sphere context: Integrating theories of planned behavior and value belief norm, self-identity and habit. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 148, 145-156. Golding, B. (2011). Older Men's Wellbeing Through Community Participation in Australia. International Journal of Men's Health, 10(1). Gommerman, L., & Monroe, M. C. (2012). Lessons learned from evaluations of citizen science programs. EDIS, 2012(6). Grenier, R. S., Callahan, J. L., Kaeppel, K., & Elliott, C. (2021). Advancing book clubs as non-formal learning to facilitate critical public pedagogy in organizations. Management Learning, 13505076211029823. Hinterlong, J. E., Morrow-Howell, N., & Rozario, P. A. (2007). Productive engagement and late life physical and mental health: Findings from a nationally representative panel study. Research on Aging, 29(4), 348-370. Jones, I., & Symon, G. (2001). Lifelong learning as serious leisure: policy, practice and potential. Leisure studies, 20(4), 269-283. Jordan, R. C., Ballard, H. L., & Phillips, T. B. (2012). Key issues and new approaches for evaluating citizen‐science learning outcomes. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 10(6), 307-309. Jordan, R. C., Gray, S. A., Howe, D. V., Brooks, W. R., & Ehrenfeld, J. G. (2011). Knowledge gain and behavioral change in citizen‐science programs. Conservation biology, 25(6), 1148-1154. https://conbio.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01745.x?download=true Lamb, R., & Brady, E. M. (2005). Participation in lifelong learning institutes: What turns members on? Educational Gerontology, 31(3), 207-224. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge university press. Li, X., Yu, R., & Su, X. (2021). Environmental Beliefs and Pro-Environmental Behavioral Intention of an Environmentally Themed Exhibition Audience: The Mediation Role of Exhibition Attachment. SAGE Open, 11(2), 21582440211027966. Li, Y., & Ferraro, K. F. (2005). Volunteering and depression in later life: Social benefit or selection processes? Journal of health and social behavior, 46(1), 68-84. Li, Y. P., Lin, S. I., & Chen, C. H. (2011). Gender differences in the relationship of social activity and quality of life in community-dwelling Taiwanese elders. Journal of Women & Aging, 23(4), 305-320. Lin, N., & Roberts, K. R. (2020). Using the theory of planned behavior to predict food safety behavioral intention: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 90, 102612. Musick, M. A., & Wilson, J. (2003). Volunteering and depression: The role of psychological and social resources in different age groups. Social science & medicine, 56(2), 259-269. Oesterle, S., Johnson, M. K., & Mortimer, J. T. (2004). Volunteerism during the transition to adulthood: A life course perspective. Social forces, 82(3), 1123-1149. Okun, M. A., & Schultz, A. (2003). Age and motives for volunteering: Testing hypotheses derived from socioemotional selectivity theory. Psychology and aging, 18(2), 231. Peters, M. (2001). National education policy constructions of the ' knowledge economy': towards a critique. The Journal of Educational Enquiry, 2(1). Phillips, T., Porticella, N., Constas, M., & Bonney, R. (2018). A framework for articulating and measuring individual learning outcomes from participation in citizen science. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 3(2). Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1969). The psychology of the child. Basic Books. Principi, A., Chiatti, C., Lamura, G., & Frerichs, F. (2012). The engagement of older people in civil society organizations. Educational Gerontology, 38(2), 83-106. Rice, S., & Fallon, B. (2011). Retention of volunteers in the emergency services: Exploring interpersonal and group cohesion factors. Australian Journal of Emergency Management, The, 26(1), 18-23. Rotolo, T., & Wilson, J. (2004). What happened to the “long civic generation”? Explaining cohort differences in volunteerism. Social forces, 82(3), 1091-1121. Sauvé, L. (2005). Currents in environmental education: Mapping a complex and evolving pedagogical field. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education (CJEE), 10(1), 11-37. Thoits, P. A., & Hewitt, L. N. (2001). Volunteer work and well-being. Journal of health and social behavior, 115-131. Toomey, A. H., & Domroese, M. C. (2013). Can citizen science lead to positive conservation attitudes and behaviors? Human Ecology Review, 50-62. Twomey, S. J. (2010). Facilitating “Gem Moments” of learning: Reading research as teacher professional development. Journal of Teaching and Learning, 7(1). UNESCO. (1978). Intergovernmental Conference on Environmental Education, Tbilisi, USSR, 14-26 October 1977: final report. Paris, France: United Nations Education, Scientific, and Cultural Organization Retrieved from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000032763/PDF/032763engo.pdf.multi UNESCO Institute for Lifelong Learning. (2016). 3rd Global Report on Adult Learning and Education: the impact of adult learning and education on health and well-being, employment and the labour market, and social, civic and community life. Hamburg, Germany Retrieved from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000245913?posInSet=16&queryId=de508257-6382-4cd8-9d88-10716abdd38a United Nations Environment Programme. (1972). Stockholm Declaration. Stockholm Retrieved from https://wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/29567/ELGP1StockD.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y Vygotsky, L. S., & Cole, M. (1978). Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes. Harvard university press. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press. Wilson, L., Harlow-Rosentraub, K., Manning, T., Simson, S., & Steele, J. (2006). Civic engagement and lifelong learning. Generations, 30(4), 90-94. World Health Organization. (2002). Active ageing: A policy framework. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/2002/WHO_NMH_NPH_02.8.pdf?ua=1 Wu, Y. L., Lin, T. W., & Wang, S. S. C. (2019). How Do Volunteer's Experiences of Organizational Facilitators Influence Their Satisfaction and Loyalty: An Example of Hospital Volunteers [Article]. Voluntas, 30(5), 1104-1117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-019-00096-6 Yamashita, T., López, E. B., Soligo, M., & Keene, J. R. (2017). Older Lifelong Learners’ Motivations for Participating in Formal Volunteer Activities in Urban Communities. Adult Education Quarterly, 67(2), 118-135. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741713616688957 國家教育研究院. (2010). 十二年國民基本教育課程綱要國民中小學暨普通型高級中等學校議題融入說明手冊. Taipei, Taiwan: 國家教育研究院 Retrieved from https://www.naer.edu.tw/upload/1/16/doc/2027/%E8%AD%B0%E9%A1%8C%E8%9E%8D%E5%85%A5%E8%AA%AA%E6%98%8E%E6%89%8B%E5%86%8A(%E5%AE%9A%E7%A8%BF%E7%89%88).pdf | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/87220 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本研究針對韌性都市林志工隊培訓課程，以學習者的角度深度分析課程成效，主要針對志工的課程參與動機、學習歷程以及學習產出進行深度分析，探討目前課程的優勢以及可加強項目，以利調整未來的課程設計。本研究透過量性前、後測問卷以及質性之參與式觀察及半結構式訪談蒐集資料，並分別運用統計方法及描述性編碼進行資料解釋。研究發現志工參與動機主要包含關懷貢獻、個人發展及福祉。學習歷程可透過學習情境模型之個人情境、社會文化情境、物理情境等三面向了解，例如於個人情境能觀察到，透過課程強化學習動機將能有效觸發志工進行學習行為，於社會文化情境能發現許多學習發生於志工之間。學習產出部分，志工的環境知識在上課後有顯著提升，環境態度與環境行為意圖無顯著提升，然而部分志工反思時仍感受到自己對於環境的態度與行為意圖有所提升。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | The study focuses on the participant’s motivation, learning process, and learning outcome, who is from resilient urban forest volunteer team. We tried to find the strength and weakness of the training program, so that we can adjust the program design. This study collects data through before and after quantitative questionnaire, qualitative participant observation, and qualitative semi-structured interview. Then we explained the data with statistics and descriptive coding. We find the participant’s motivation can be mainly classified into four categories, which are generativity, personal development, and well-being. The learning process could be understood through the learning contextual model, which divided the learning process into personal context, social-cultural context, and physical context. For example, we can strengthen the learning motivation through the courses to trigger participant’s learning behavior. And there are many learning events occur between participants. For the learning outcome, we found that the environmental knowledge of the participants has significant difference before and after the program, however the environmental attitudes and environmental behave intentions do not. Nevertheless, some participants still feel the environmental attitudes and environmental behave intentions been enhanced through reflecting. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2023-05-18T16:26:58Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2023-05-18T16:26:59Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 謝辭 I
摘要 II Abstract III 第一章 前言 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究問題 2 第二章 文獻回顧 3 第一節 參與動機 3 第二節 學習歷程 6 第三節 學習產出 8 第四節 前人研究案例 12 第三章 研究方法 14 第一節 研究程序 14 第二節 研究對象 14 第三節 資料收集 15 第四節 資料分析方法 20 第五節 培訓課程內容 20 第六節 研究限制 21 第四章 研究結果 22 第一節 參與志工基本資料 22 第二節 參與動機 25 第三節 學習歷程 34 第四節 學習產出 47 第五節 研究結果小結 55 第五章 研究討論 59 第一節 參與動機 59 第二節 學習歷程 60 第三節 學習產出 63 第六章 研究結論與建議 65 第一節 研究結論 65 第二節 課程安排與研究方法精進建議 66 參考文獻 68 附錄 74 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.title | 參與志工在韌性都市林志工隊培力過程之參與動機、學習歷程及學習產出 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Study on participants’ motivation, learning process, and learning outcomes of the resilient urban forest volunteer team during the courses of empowerment | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 111-1 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 王順美;葛兆年 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Shun-Mei Wang;Chao-Nien Koh | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 環境教育,志工,參與動機,學習歷程,學習產出, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Environmental education,Motivation,Volunteer,Learning process,Learning outcome, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 86 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202300532 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(限校園內公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2023-02-17 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 森林環境暨資源學系 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 森林環境暨資源學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-111-1.pdf 授權僅限NTU校內IP使用（校園外請利用VPN校外連線服務） | 2.84 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。