請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/87008完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 陳政位 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Cheng-Wei Chen | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 蔡國瑋 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Kuo-Wei Tsai | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-05-02T17:23:14Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2023-11-09 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2023-05-02 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2022 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2023-01-18 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | 中文文獻
1. 方中柔、陳孟甫,2008。「目標區政策對農産品價格穩定性之研究」 , 《農業經濟叢刊》 。 14卷,1期,39-82。 2. 王葳、賴鐘惠、胡士文、鄭嘉慧,2007。「股票政策宣告對農產品價格與股票價格的動態影響」 , 《農業與經濟》 。39期,1-43。 3. 王葳、胡士文,2003。「政策跨時搭配與農產品價格的動態調整」 , 《人文及社會科學集刊》 。 15卷,4期,595-625。 4. 王葳、胡士文、賴景昌,2002。「貨幣政策宣示與農產品價格的動態調整:固定匯率制度的探討」 , 《經濟論文叢刊》 。 30卷,3期,313-333。 5. 呂麗蓉、戴孟宜、胡士文、廖培賢,2008。「農產品市場干擾與最適農產品價格目標區」 , 《農業與經濟》 。40期,1-44。 6. 許文富,1997。《農產運銷學》。臺北:正中書局,48-49、317-320。 7. 許聖章,張靜貞,2011。 「臺灣颱風災害之影響評估:以蔬菜 供需為例」 , 《應用經濟論叢》 ,89期,31-62。 8. 彭聖志,田園雙,寧哲,2010。 「林產品價格的時間序列分析:以福州購木場松山原木為例」 , 《林業經濟問題》 ,30期,123-125。 9. 廖柏霖,2020。 「食安問題與種植預期心理對於蔬菜市場價格之影響-以小白菜交易市場為例」 ,國立臺灣大學農業經濟研究所碩士論文。 10. 冀德剛、周靜、李春蘭,2008。 「時間序列分析在對豬肉價格的預設分析中的應用」 , 《全國貿易經濟類核心期刊》,538期。 11. 賴景昌、王葳、胡士文,2000。「目標區與農產品價格的穩定:小型開放經濟之分析」 , 《農業經濟叢刊》 。 6卷,1期,33-66。 中文網路文獻 1. 行政院農業委員會,2022。農業統計資料查詢。臺北市,行政院農業委員會。取自 https://agrstat.coa.gov.tw/sdweb/public/inquiry/InquireAdvance.aspx 2. 行政院農業委員會,2022。農業知識庫。臺北市,行政院農業委員會。取自 https://kmweb.coa.gov.tw/knowledgebase.php 3. 林怡均,2021。《上下游新聞》。取自https://www.newsmarket.com.tw/support/ 4. 農產品批發市場交易行情站,2022。水果日交易行情。取自https://amis.afa.gov.tw/fruit/FruitProdDayTransInfo.aspx。 英文文獻 1. Bertola, G. and R. Caballero, 1992. “Target Zones and Realignments,” American Economic Review, 82, 520-536 2. Biglan, A., D. Ary, and A. C. Wagenaar. 2000. “The value of interrupted time-series experiments for community intervention research.” Prevention Science. 1: 31-49. 3. Blanchard, O. J., 1981. “Output, the Stock Market, and Interest Rates,” American Economic Review. 71:132-143. 4. Briesacher, B. A., S. B. Soumerai, F. Zhang, S. Toh, S. E. Andrade, J. L. Wagner, A. Shoaibi, and J. H. Gurwitz., 2013. “A critical review of methods to evaluate the impact of FDA regulatory actions.” Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety 22: 986– 994 5. Beetsma, R. M. W. J. and F. Van der Ploeg, 1998. “Macroeconomic Stabilization and Intervention Policy under an Exchange Rate Band,” Journal of International Money and Finance, 17, 339-353. 6. Dornbusch, R., 1976. “Expectations and Exchange Rate Dynamics,” Journal of Political Economy. 84:1161-1176. 7. Frankel, J. A., 1986. “ Expectations and Commodity Price Dynamics: The Overshooting Model, ”American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 68:344-348 8. Gillings, D., D. Makuc, and E. Siegel., 1981. “Analysis of interrupted time series mortality trends: An example to evaluate regionalized perinatal care.” American Journal of Public Health. 71: 38–46. 9. Kempa, B. and M. Nelles, 1999. “The Theory of Exchange Rate Target Zones," Journal of Economic Surveys. 13: 173-210. 10. Klein, M. W., 1990. “Playing with the Band: Dynamic Effects of Target Zones in an Open Economy,” International Economic Review. 31: 757–772 11. Krugman, P., 1991. “Target Zones and Exchange Rate Dynamics,” Quarterly Journal of Economics. 106: 669–682. 12. Lai, C. C., S. W. Hu and V. Wang , 1996. “Commodity Price Dynamics and Anticipated Shocks, ” American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 78:982-990. 13. Lai, C. C., S. W. Hu, and C. P. Fan, 2005. “The Overshooting Hypothesis of Agricultural Prices: The Role of Asset Substitutability,” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics. 30:128-150. 14. Linden, A., 2015. “Conducting interrupted time-series analysis for single- and multiple- group comparisons.” Stata Journal 2015.15:480-500. 15. Linden, A. and Arbor, A., 2017. “A comprehensive set of post estimation measures to enrich interrupted time-series analysis.” Stata Journal 2017.17:73-88. 16. Muller, A., 2004. “Florida's motorcycle helmet law repeal and fatality rates.” American Journal of Public Health. 94: 556–558. 17. Obstfeld, M., 1986. “ Overshooting Agricultural Commodity Markets and Public Policy: Discussion, ”American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 68:420-421. 18. Ramsay, C. R., L. Matowe, R. Grilli, J. M. Grimshaw, and R. E. Thomas., 2003. “Interrupted time series designs in health technology assessment: Lessons from two systematic reviews of behavior change strategies.” International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.19: 613–623. 19. Wooldridge, J.M., 2016. Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach, 6th Edition, South-Western, a part of Cengage Learning. | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/87008 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 臺灣鳳梨平均年產量約 43 萬公噸,其中約 10% 外銷至國外,於2015 年至 2020 年臺灣鳳梨外銷至中國佔總外銷量90%以上,為主要出口國家。而農業為易受氣候環境干擾之產業,若再加上無預警之禁運政策,將對臺灣農業產生負面影響。本研究主要探討發生於2021中國禁運臺灣鳳梨事件,將如何影響我國鳳梨批發市場價格,並檢視政府對此次禁運事件所做因應措施之成效。
本研究之研究資料為臺北第二果菜批發市場2020 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 12 月 31 日以及 2021 年 1 月 1 日至 2021年 12 月 31 日兩年度之鳳梨平均價格(元/公斤),研究方法包括中斷時間序列(ITSA)以及線性迴歸模型。實證結果顯示,當發生中國禁銷臺灣鳳梨事件時,臺灣鳳梨批發市場價格可能與禁運事件之發生有所關聯,而導致禁運事件發生期間鳳梨價格之趨勢相較於禁運事件發生前之趨勢略為平緩,惟 2020 年鳳梨價格趨勢呈現緩慢地下降,與 2021 年之趨勢在禁運事件發生前與禁運事件發生期間皆呈現上升趨勢不同。因此由實證分析可得關聯性之推論,即在我國鳳梨運銷至中國受阻期間(外銷占 10%且中國占外銷量之 9 成),其外銷因無法輸出導致2021年國內市場鳳梨批發價格為平緩上升之趨勢。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Taiwan's average annual output of pineapples is about 430,000 metric tons, of which about 10% will be exported abroad. From 2015 to 2020, China is Taiwan’s major export country of pineapples, accounting for more than 90% of the total foreign sales. Agriculture is an industry susceptible to climate and environmental disturbances, and if coupled with the embargo policy without warning, it will have a negative impact on Taiwan's agriculture. This study examines how the 2021 China's embargo policy on pineapples in Taiwan will affect the pineapple wholesale price in Taiwan, and examines the effectiveness of the government's response to the embargo.
The sample of the study comes from the average price of pineapples (NTD/kg) in Taipei Second Fruits & Vegetables Wholesale Market during January 1, 2020 to December 31, 2020 and January 1, 2021 to December 31, 2021. The methodology includes interrupted time series analysis (ITSA) and linear regression models. The results reveal that after China's embargo policy on pineapples in Taiwan, the pineapple wholesale price in Taiwan was indeed affected by the policy, resulting in the trend of pineapple prices after the embargo policy being slightly slower than the trend before the embargo policy. However, the trend of pineapple prices in 2020 showed a slow decline, unlike the trend in 2021, which showed an upward trend before and after the embargo policy. Therefore, the causal inference can be obtained from empirical analysis, that is, after the shipment of pineapples from Taiwan to China is blocked, the pineapple wholesale price in 2021 is a flat upward trend due to the inability to export. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2023-05-02T17:23:14Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2023-05-02T17:23:14Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員審定書 i
謝辭 ii 摘要 iii Abstract iv 目錄 v 圖目錄 vii 表目錄 viii 第壹章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的 10 第三節 研究流程 11 第貳章 文獻回顧 12 第一節 ITSA模型與線性迴歸模型之文獻回顧 12 第二節 政府政策對農產品價格影響之文獻回顧 13 第三節 農產品價格穩定之文獻回顧 14 第叁章 研究方法 15 第一節 研究模型之介紹—ITSA研究模型 15 第二節 線性迴歸模型 19 第三節 研究對象與資料來源 20 第肆章 實證結果 21 第一節 實證迴歸之敘述性統計分析 21 第二節 模型實證迴歸圖形解釋與比較 24 第三節 我國政府可能政策實施之探討 27 第伍章 結論與建議 28 第一節 結論 28 第二節 建議 29 參考文獻 30 中文文獻 30 中文網路文獻 31 英文文獻 32 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.subject | 線性迴歸模型 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 鳳梨 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 農產價格 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 農產運銷 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 中斷時間序列分析(ITSA) | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | agricultural marketing | en |
| dc.subject | pineapple | en |
| dc.subject | linear regression model | en |
| dc.subject | agricultural prices | en |
| dc.subject | interrupted time series analysis (ITSA) | en |
| dc.title | 中國對臺禁運鳳梨措施對臺灣鳳梨價格影響之研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The Study of How China's Embargo Policy Impacts Pineapple Price in Taiwan | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 111-1 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 黃金生;陳佳政 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Chin-Sheng Huang;Chia-Cheng Chen | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 鳳梨,農產價格,農產運銷,中斷時間序列分析(ITSA),線性迴歸模型, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | pineapple,agricultural prices,agricultural marketing,interrupted time series analysis (ITSA),linear regression model, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 33 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202300141 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2023-01-18 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 農業經濟學系 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 農業經濟學系 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-111-1.pdf | 1.76 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
