請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/86455完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 林志民(Jim Jr-Min Lin) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Jie-Ning Yang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 楊絜甯 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-03-19T23:56:51Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2022-08-18 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2022 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2022-08-17 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 1. D. H. Ehhalt, in Global Aspects of Atmospheric Chemistry, ed. W. G. H. Baumgärtel, and F. Hensel Springer, 1999, vol. 6, pp. 21-110. 2. R. Harrison, J. Yin, R. Tilling, X. Cai, P. Seakins, J. Hopkins, D. Lansley, A. Lewis, M. Hunter and D. Heard, Sci. Total Environ., 2006, 360, 5-25. 3. N. M. Donahue, G. T. Drozd, S. A. Epstein, A. A. Presto and J. H. Kroll, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2011, 13, 10848-10857. 4. S. E. Paulson and J. J. Orlando, Geophys. Res. Lett., 1996, 23, 3727-3730. 5. R. Criegee, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl., 1975, 14, 745-752. 6. R. Criegee and G. Wenner, Justus Liebigs Ann. Chem., 1949, 564, 9-15. 7. R. Mauldin Iii, T. Berndt, M. Sipilä, P. Paasonen, T. Petäjä, S. Kim, T. Kurtén, F. Stratmann, V.-M. Kerminen and M. Kulmala, Nature, 2012, 488, 193-196. 8. R. A. Cox and S. A. Penkett, Nature, 1971, 230, 321-322. 9. J. G. Calvert and W. R. Stockwell, Environ. Sci. Technol., 1983, 17, 428A-443A. 10. W. Chao, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2017, 46, 7483-7497. 11. D. Stone, M. Blitz, L. Daubney, N. U. M. Howes and P. Seakins, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2014, 16, 1139-1149. 12. L. Sheps, A. M. Scully and K. Au, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2014, 16, 26701-26706. 13. T. Berndt, H. Herrmann and T. Kurtén, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2017, 139, 13387-13392. 14. R. Chhantyal-Pun, A. Davey, D. E. Shallcross, C. J. Percival and A. J. Orr-Ewing, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2015, 17, 3617-3626. 15. Y. Liu, K. D. Bayes and S. P. Sander, J. Phys. Chem. A, 2014, 118, 741-747. 16. L. Sheps, J. Phys. Chem. Lett., 2013, 4, 4201-4205. 17. T. Berndt, T. Jokinen, R. L. Mauldin, T. Petäjä, H. Herrmann, H. Junninen, P. Paasonen, D. R. Worsnop and M. Sipilä, J. Phys. Chem. Lett., 2012, 3, 2892-2896. 18. Y.-P. Lee, J. Chem. Phys., 2015, 143, 020901. 19. O. Welz, J. D. Savee, D. L. Osborn, S. S. Vasu, C. J. Percival, D. E. Shallcross and C. A. Taatjes, Science, 2012, 335, 204-207. 20. R. Chhantyal-Pun, O. Welz, J. D. Savee, A. J. Eskola, E. P. Lee, L. Blacker, H. R. Hill, M. Ashcroft, M. A. H. Khan and G. C. Lloyd-Jones, J. Phys. Chem. A, 2017, 121, 4-15. 21. C. A. Taatjes, O. Welz, A. J. Eskola, J. D. Savee, A. M. Scheer, D. E. Shallcross, B. Rotavera, E. P. Lee, J. M. Dyke and D. K. Mok, Science, 2013, 340, 177-180. 22. H.-L. Huang, W. Chao and J. J.-M. Lin, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 2015, 112, 10857-10862. 23. Y.-H. Lin, Y.-L. Li, W. Chao and K. Takahashi, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2020, 22, 13603-13612. 24. Y.-H. Lin, C. Yin, K. Takahashi and J. J.-M. Lin, Commun. Chem., 2021, 4, 1-8. 25. M. A. H. Khan, C. J. Percival, R. L. Caravan, C. A. Taatjes and D. E. Shallcross, Environ. Sci.: Process. Impacts, 2018, 20, 437-453. 26. R. L. Caravan, M. A. H. Khan, B. Rotavera, E. Papajak, I. O. Antonov, M.-W. Chen, K. Au, W. Chao, D. L. Osborn, J. J.-M. Lin, C. J. Percival, D. E. Shallcross and C. A. Taatjes, Faraday Discuss., 2017, 200, 313-330. 27. W. Chao, J.-T. Hsieh, C.-H. Chang and J. J.-M. Lin, Science, 2015, 347, 751-754. 28. L.-C. Lin, W. Chao, C.-H. Chang and K. Takahashi, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2016, 18, 28189-28197. 29. Y. Liu, F. Liu, S. Liu, D. Dai, W. Dong and X. Yang, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2017, 19, 20786-20794. 30. M. C. Smith, C.-H. Chang, W. Chao, L.-C. Lin, K. Takahashi, K. A. Boering and J. J.-M. Lin, J. Phys. Chem. Lett., 2015, 6, 2708-2713. 31. T. R. Lewis, M. A. Blitz, D. E. Heard and P. W. Seakins, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2015, 17, 4859-4863. 32. R. Yajima, Y. Sakamoto, S. Inomata and J. Hirokawa, J. Phys. Chem. A, 2017, 121, 6440-6449. 33. B. Ouyang, M. W. McLeod, R. L. Jones and W. J. Bloss, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2013, 15, 17070-17075. 34. M. J. Newland, A. R. Rickard, L. Vereecken, A. Muñoz, M. Ródenas and W. J. Bloss, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 2015, 15, 9521-9536. 35. T. Berndt, R. Kaethner, J. Voigtländer, F. Stratmann, M. Pfeifle, P. Reichle, M. Sipilä, M. Kulmala and M. Olzmann, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2015, 17, 19862-19873. 36. L. Sheps, B. Rotavera, A. J. Eskola, D. L. Osborn, C. A. Taatjes, K. Au, D. E. Shallcross, M. A. H. Khan and C. J. Percival, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2017, 19, 21970-21979. 37. O. Welz, A. J. Eskola, L. Sheps, B. Rotavera, J. D. Savee, A. M. Scheer, D. L. Osborn, D. Lowe, A. Murray Booth and P. Xiao, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2014, 53, 4547-4550. 38. E. S. Foreman, K. M. Kapnas and C. Murray, Angew. Chem., 2016, 128, 10575-10578. 39. R. Chhantyal-Pun, B. Rotavera, M. R. McGillen, M. A. H. Khan, A. J. Eskola, R. L. Caravan, L. Blacker, D. P. Tew, D. L. Osborn, C. J. Percival, C. A. Taatjes, D. E. Shallcross and A. J. Orr-Ewing, ACS Earth Space Chem., 2018, 2, 833-842. 40. R. L. Caravan, M. F. Vansco, K. Au, M. A. H. Khan, Y.-L. Li, F. A. Winiberg, K. Zuraski, Y.-H. Lin, W. Chao and N. Trongsiriwat, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 2020, 117, 9733-9740. 41. W.-C. Liang, P.-L. Luo and Y.-P. Lee, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2021, 23, 11082-11090. 42. R. Chhantyal‐Pun, M. R. McGillen, J. M. Beames, M. A. H. Khan, C. J. Percival, D. E. Shallcross and A. J. Orr‐Ewing, Angew. Chem., 2017, 129, 9172-9175. 43. V. P. Barber, S. Pandit, A. M. Green, N. Trongsiriwat, P. J. Walsh, S. J. Klippenstein and M. I. Lester, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2018, 140, 10866-10880. 44. M. F. Vansco, B. Marchetti, N. Trongsiriwat, T. Bhagde, G. Wang, P. J. Walsh, S. J. Klippenstein and M. I. Lester, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2019, 141, 15058-15069. 45. L. Vereecken, A. Novelli and D. Taraborrelli, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2017, 19, 31599-31612. 46. M. T. Kuo, K. Takahashi and J. J. M. Lin, ChemPhysChem, 2020, 21, 2056-2059. 47. M.-T. Kuo, J.-N. Yang, J. J.-M. Lin and K. Takahashi, J. Phys. Chem. A, 2021, 125, 6580-6590. 48. L. Vereecken, H. Harder and A. Novelli, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2012, 14, 14682-14695. 49. L. Vereecken, D. R. Glowacki and M. J. Pilling, Chem. Rev., 2015, 115, 4063-4114. 50. M. Kumar, A. Sinha and J. S. Francisco, Acc. Chem. Res., 2016, 49, 877-883. 51. C. Cabezas, J.-C. Guillemin and Y. Endo, J. Chem. Phys., 2018, 149, 084309. 52. M. Nakajima and Y. Endo, J. Chem. Phys., 2013, 139, 101103. 53. M. Nakajima, Q. Yue and Y. Endo, J. Mol. Spectrosc., 2015, 310, 109-112. 54. M. Nakajima and Y. Endo, J. Chem. Phys., 2014, 140, 134302. 55. Y.-T. Su, Y.-H. Huang, A. Witek Henryk and Y.-P. Lee, Science, 2013, 340, 174-176. 56. Y.-H. Huang, J. Li, H. Guo and Y.-P. Lee, J. Chem. Phys., 2015, 142, 214301. 57. H.-Y. Lin, Y.-H. Huang, X. Wang, J. M. Bowman, Y. Nishimura, H. A. Witek and Y.-P. Lee, Nat. Commun., 2015, 6, 7012. 58. Y.-Y. Wang, C.-Y. Chung and Y.-P. Lee, J. Chem. Phys., 2016, 145, 154303. 59. F. Liu, M. Beames Joseph, S. Petit Andrew, B. McCoy Anne and I. Lester Marsha, Science, 2014, 345, 1596-1598. 60. Y. Fang, F. Liu, V. P. Barber, S. J. Klippenstein, A. B. McCoy and M. I. Lester, J. Chem. Phys., 2016, 144, 061102. 61. Y. Fang, F. Liu, V. P. Barber, S. J. Klippenstein, A. B. McCoy and M. I. Lester, J. Chem. Phys., 2016, 145, 234308. 62. Y. Fang, F. Liu, S. J. Klippenstein and M. I. Lester, J. Chem. Phys., 2016, 145, 044312. 63. W.-L. Ting, Y.-H. Chen, W. Chao, M. C. Smith and J. J.-M. Lin, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2014, 16, 10438-10443. 64. M. C. Smith, W.-L. Ting, C.-H. Chang, K. Takahashi, K. A. Boering and J. J.-M. Lin, J. Chem. Phys., 2014, 141, 074302. 65. W.-L. Ting, C.-H. Chang, Y.-F. Lee, H. Matsui, Y.-P. Lee and J. J.-M. Lin, J. Chem. Phys., 2014, 141, 104308. 66. M. C. Smith, W. Chao, K. Takahashi, K. A. Boering and J. J.-M. Lin, J. Phys. Chem. A, 2016, 120, 4789-4798. 67. Y.-P. Chang, C.-H. Chang, K. Takahashi and J. J.-M. Lin, Chem. Phys. Lett., 2016, 653, 155-160. 68. J. M. Beames, F. Liu, L. Lu and M. I. Lester, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2012, 134, 20045-20048. 69. J. M. Beames, F. Liu, L. Lu and M. I. Lester, J. Chem. Phys., 2013, 138, 244307. 70. M. F. Vansco, H. Li and M. I. Lester, J. Chem. Phys., 2017, 147, 013907. 71. C. Abeysekera, B. Joalland, N. Ariyasingha, L. N. Zack, I. R. Sims, R. W. Field and A. G. Suits, J. Phys. Chem. Lett., 2015, 6, 1599-1604. 72. B. J. Finlayson-Pitts and J. N. Pitts Jr, Chemistry of the upper and lower atmosphere: theory, experiments, and applications, Elsevier, 1999. 73. J. Kleffmann, T. Gavriloaiei, Y. Elshorbany, M. Ródenas and P. Wiesen, J. Atmos. Chem., 2007, 58, 131-149. 74. L. Vereecken, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2017, 19, 28630-28640. 75. P. Raghunath, Y.-P. Lee and M. C. Lin, J. Phys. Chem. A, 2017, 121, 3871-3878. 76. H. Johnston and R. Graham, J. Phys. Chem. , 1973, 77, 62-63. 77. F. Liu, J. M. Beames, A. M. Green and M. I. Lester, J. Phys. Chem. A, 2014, 118, 2298-2306. 78. M. Wang, H. Kaur and C.-C. Chen, AIChE Journal, 2017, 63, 3110-3117. 79. S. Sander, J. Abbatt, J. Barker, J. Burkholder, R. Friedl, D. Golden, R. Huie, C. Kolb, M. Kurylo and G. Moortgat, JPL, Pasadena, 2011, 15. 80. R. Atkinson, D. L. Baulch, R. A. Cox, J. N. Crowley, R. F. Hampson, R. G. Hynes, M. E. Jenkin, M. J. Rossi and J. Troe, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 2004, 4, 1461-1738. 81. Y.-H. Lin, K. Takahashi and J. J.-M. Lin, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2022, 24, 10439-10450. 82. P. Spietz, J. C. Gómez Martín and J. P. Burrows, J. Photochem. Photobiol. A: Chem., 2005, 176, 50-67. 83. Z. S. Mir, T. R. Lewis, L. Onel, M. A. Blitz, P. W. Seakins and D. Stone, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2020, 22, 9448-9459. 84. S. L. Manatt and A. L. Lane, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer, 1993, 50, 267-276. 85. J. Chao and B. J. Zwolinski, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data, 1978, 7, 363-377. 86. J. R. Hart and A. J. Thakkar, J. Mol. Struct.: THEOCHEM, 2005, 714, 217-220. 87. J. Chocholoušová, J. Vacek and P. Hobza, J. Phys. Chem. A, 2003, 107, 3086-3092. 88. C.-A. Chung, J. W. Su and Y.-P. Lee, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2019, 21, 21445-21455. 89. M. A. H. Khan, W. C. Morris, M. Galloway, Beth M. A. Shallcross, C. J. Percival and D. E. Shallcross, Int. J. Chem. Kinet., 2017, 49, 611-621. 90. A. Novelli, K. Hens, C. Tatum Ernest, M. Martinez, A. C. Nölscher, V. Sinha, P. Paasonen, T. Petäjä, M. Sipilä, T. Elste, C. Plass-Dülmer, G. J. Phillips, D. Kubistin, J. Williams, L. Vereecken, J. Lelieveld and H. Harder, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 2017, 17, 7807-7826. 91. D. D. Parrish, R. B. Norton, M. J. Bollinger, S. C. Liu, P. C. Murphy, D. L. Albritton, F. C. Fehsenfeld and B. J. Huebert, J. Mol. Spectrosc., 1986, 91, 5379-5393. 92. Y.-H. Lin, C.-H. Yang, K. Takahashi and J. J.-M. Lin, J. Phys. Chem. A, 2020, 124, 9375-9381. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/86455 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 克里奇中間體為大氣中重要的物種,其反應性高,可與水蒸氣、二氧化硫、有機酸或無機酸等大氣分子發生反應。硝酸 (HNO3) 為常見的無機酸,且為空氣中的汙染物之一,可經由大氣中之氮氧化物 (NOx) 循環反應生成,且與人類的活動息息相關,在大氣中的含量可達到ppb的等級。本研究的目的為探討克里奇中間體與硝酸的反應。先前,Foreman等人研究了最簡單的克里奇中間體 (CH2OO) 與HNO3的反應,其結果顯示此反應非常快速,反應速率常數之數量級為10-10 cm3 s-1,但其定量HNO3的方法可能有很大的誤差,造成其速率常數可能不準確。而在本文中,我們利用相對可靠的紫外光吸收光譜法定量HNO3以及進一步研究與比較四種具有不同取代基的克里奇中間體與硝酸之反應動力學,此四種克里奇中間體分別為CH2OO、(CH3)2COO、methyl vinyl ketone oxide (MVKO) 與methacrolein oxide (MACRO),其中後兩者具有乙烯基取代,可藉由共振而穩定其結構。我們的結果顯示,CH2OO、(CH3)2COO、MVKO及MACRO與硝酸的反應速率常數分別為 (1.51 ± 0.45) × 10−10、(3.54 ± 1.06) × 10−10、(3.93 ± 1.18) × 10−10 及 (3.0 ± 1.3) × 10−10 cm3 s−1,這些反應如同克里奇中間體與其他酸類反應一樣都相當快速,與先前的研究結果一致,然而對比文獻中CH2OO + HNO3的反應速率常數,我們認為其高估了約3.6倍。此外,不同於克里奇中間體與水蒸氣的反應,克里奇中間體與HNO3的反應並未觀察到顯著的取代基效應。對於CH2OO與(CH3)2COO的反應而言,在100至400 Torr之壓力範圍內亦未觀察到顯著的壓力效應。本文亦探討了克里奇中間體與HNO3的反應在大氣中的重要性,我們的實驗結果顯示,在氮氧化物汙染嚴重及乾燥的地區,克里奇中間體與硝酸的反應以及其產物可能是值得關注的。但此反應對於除去在大氣中之HNO3的貢獻可能並不顯著。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Criegee intermediates (CIs) are very reactive species and can react with atmospheric molecules such as water, SO2, and organic/inorganic acids. Nitric acid (HNO3) is a common inorganic acid and also one of the air pollutants. HNO3 is formed from the NOx cycle in the atmosphere. In this work, we focus on the reactions between CIs and HNO3. Previously, Forman et al. have studied the kinetics of CH2OO reaction with HNO3. Their results show that the reaction is very fast with a rate coefficient on the order of 10-10 cm3 s-1. But their experimental method to determine the concentration of HNO3 might cause a large uncertainty in the reported rate coefficient. Thus, here we utilize a relatively reliable UV absorption spectroscopy to measure the concentration of HNO3 and to further investigate the kinetics of HNO3 reactions with four CIs, which have different substitute groups. These four CIs are CH2OO, (CH3)2COO, methyl vinyl ketone oxide (MVKO) and methacrolein oxide (MACRO); the last two CIs are vinyl substituted and resonance stabilized. Our results show that the rate coefficients are (1.51 ± 0.45) × 10−10, (3.54 ± 1.06) × 10−10, (3.93 ± 1.18) × 10−10, and (3.0 ± 1.3) × 10−10 cm3 s−1 for HNO3 reactions with CH2OO, (CH3)2COO, MVKO, and MACRO, respectively. All of these reactions are extremely fast, consistent with previous observations of CI reactions with acids. The rate coefficient of CH2OO + HNO3 in the literature is, however, overestimated by a factor of 3.6. We conclude that the reactivity of CIs toward HNO3 has no significant substituent effect, which is different from that of CIs + water. In addition, we observed no pressure dependence in reactions of CH2OO and (CH3)2COO with HNO3 under a pressure range of 100−400 Torr. Here, we also discuss the atmospheric impact of CI reactions with HNO3. Our results indicate that, in dry area with severe NOx pollution, the reactions of CI + HNO3 and their products may be worthy of attention. Even though these reactions may be insignificant in the removal processes of HNO3 in the atmosphere. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2023-03-19T23:56:51Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 U0001-2707202214285600.pdf: 3225713 bytes, checksum: 82bc5d1f0a0368abdbf2907710d77516 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2022 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 中文摘要 …………………………………………………………………………….. I Abstract …………………………...…………………………………………………. II Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 Criegee intermediates ………………………………………………………...1 1.2 Substituent effect and pressure dependence in Criegee intermediate reactions ……………………………………………………………………… 2 1.3 HNO3 in the atmosphere …………………………………………………….. 6 1.4 Previous studies of Criegee intermediate reactions with HNO3 ……………7 Chapter 2 Experimental method 2.1 Synthesis of Criegee intermediates ………………………………………….. 9 2.2 Quantification method and optical setup ………………………………….. 10 2.3 Background subtraction …………………………………………………….. 17 Chapter 3 Results and discussions 3.1 CH2OO + HNO3 ……………………………………………………………... 18 3.2 (CH3)2COO + HNO3 ………………………………………………………… 27 3.3 MVKO + HNO3 ……………………………………………………………… 30 3.4 MACRO + HNO3 ……………………………………………………………. 34 3.5 HNO3 dimer ………………………………………………………………….. 41 3.6 Error analysis …………………………………………………………………42 3.7 CI reactions with other acids ……………………………………………….. 47 3.8 Atmospheric implication ……………………………………………………. 48 Chapter 4 Conclusions ……………………………………………………………… 52 References ……………………………………………………………………………. 53 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.subject | 取代基效應 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 取代基效應 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 壓力效應 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 紫外光譜法 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 克里奇中間體 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 反應動力學 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 反應動力學 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 克里奇中間體 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 紫外光譜法 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 壓力效應 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | pressure dependence | en |
| dc.subject | reaction kinetics | en |
| dc.subject | reaction kinetics | en |
| dc.subject | Criegee intermediates | en |
| dc.subject | UV absorption spectroscopy | en |
| dc.subject | Criegee intermediates | en |
| dc.subject | UV absorption spectroscopy | en |
| dc.subject | substituent effect | en |
| dc.subject | substituent effect | en |
| dc.subject | pressure dependence | en |
| dc.title | 以紫外光吸收光譜法測量克里奇中間體與硝酸的反應動力學 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Kinetics of Criegee Intermediate Reactions with Nitric Acid Measured by UV Absorption Spectroscopy | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 110-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.advisor-orcid | 林志民(0000-0002-8308-2552) | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 李遠鵬(Yuan-Pern Lee),張元賓(Yuan-Pin Chang),羅佩凌(Pei-Ling Luo),朱立岡(Li-Kang Chu) | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee-orcid | 李遠鵬(0000-0001-6418-7378),張元賓(0000-0002-2205-6262),羅佩凌(0000-0002-5914-5234),朱立岡(0000-0001-6080-9598) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 反應動力學,克里奇中間體,紫外光譜法,壓力效應,取代基效應, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | reaction kinetics,Criegee intermediates,UV absorption spectroscopy,pressure dependence,substituent effect, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 57 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202201778 | |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2022-08-17 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 化學研究所 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2022-08-18 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 化學系 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| U0001-2707202214285600.pdf | 3.15 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
