請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/86143完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 謝俊霖(Choon-Ling Sia) | |
| dc.contributor.author | I-Chen Chen | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 陳怡蓁 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-03-19T23:38:53Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2022-09-23 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2022 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2022-09-07 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Adler, P. S., & Kwon, S.-W. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of management review, 27(1), 17-40. Barroso-Castro, C., Villegas-Periñan, M. d. M., & Casillas-Bueno, J. C. (2015). How boards’ internal and external social capital interact to affect firm performance. Strategic Organization, 14(1), 6-31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127015604799 Basole, R. C., Park, H., & Barnett, B. C. (2015). Coopetition and convergence in the ICT ecosystem. Telecommunications Policy, 39(7), 537-552. Bhattacharya, M., & Bloch, H. (2004). Determinants of innovation. Small business economics, 22(2), 155-162. Bonacich, P. (1972). Factoring and weighting approaches to status scores and clique identification. Journal of mathematical sociology, 2(1), 113-120. Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign's Academy for Entrepreneurial Leadership Historical Research Reference in Entrepreneurship. Cannella Jr, A. A., Park, J.-H., & Lee, H.-U. (2008). Top management team functional background diversity and firm performance: Examining the roles of team member colocation and environmental uncertainty. Academy of Management journal, 51(4), 768-784. Chen, D. Q., Zhang, Y., Xiao, J., & Xie, K. (2021). Making Digital Innovation Happen: A Chief Information Officer Issue Selling Perspective. Information Systems Research. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2021.1008 Chen, M. C., Cheng, S. J., & Hwang, Y. (2005). An empirical investigation of the relationship between intellectual capital and firms’ market value and financial performance. Journal of intellectual capital. Choi, I., Chung, S., Han, K., & Pinsonneault, A. (2021). CEO Risk-Taking Incentives and IT Innovation: The Moderating Role of a CEO’s IT-Related Human Capital. MIS Quarterly, 45(4), 2175-2192. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2022/15606 Chuluun, T., Prevost, A., & Upadhyay, A. (2017). Firm network structure and innovation. Journal of Corporate Finance, 44, 193-214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2017.03.009 Chung, S., Animesh, A., Han, K., & Pinsonneault, A. (2019). Software Patents and Firm Value: A Real Options Perspective on the Role of Innovation Orientation and Environmental Uncertainty. Information Systems Research, 30(3), 1073-1097. Demirkan, H., Spohrer, J. C., & Welser, J. J. (2016). Digital innovation and strategic transformation. IT Professional, 18(6), 14-18. Dery, K., Sebastian, I. M., & van der Meulen, N. (2017). The digital workplace is key to digital innovation. MIS Quarterly Executive, 16(2). Eaton, J. (2001). Management communication: the threat of groupthink. Corporate Communications: An International Journal. Fichman, R. G., Dos Santos, B. L., & Zheng, Z. (2014). Digital innovation as a fundamental and powerful concept in the information systems curriculum. MIS Quarterly, 38(2), 329-A315. Finkelstein, S., & Hambrick, D. C. (1990). Top-management-team tenure and organizational outcomes: The moderating role of managerial discretion. Administrative science quarterly, 484-503. Firk, S., Gehrke, Y., Hanelt, A., & Wolff, M. (2022). Top management team characteristics and digital innovation: Exploring digital knowledge and TMT interfaces. Long Range Planning, 55(3), 102166. Galia, F., & Zenou, E. (2012). Board composition and forms of innovation: does diversity make a difference? European Journal of International Management, 6(6), 630-650. Gottesman, A. A., & Morey, M. R. (2010). CEO educational background and firm financial performance. Journal of Applied Finance (Formerly Financial Practice and Education), 20(2). Guo, H., Sun, Y., & Qiu, X. (2021). Cross-shareholding network and corporate bond financing cost in China. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.najef.2021.101423 Héroux, S., & Fortin, A. (2018). The moderating role of IT-business alignment in the relationship between IT governance, IT competence, and innovation. Information Systems Management, 35(2), 98-123. Haislip, J., Lim, J.-H., & Pinsker, R. (2021). The Impact of Executives’ IT Expertise on Reported Data Security Breaches. Information Systems Research, 32(2), 318-334. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2020.0986 Harjoto, M. A., & Wang, Y. (2020). Board of directors network centrality and environmental, social and governance (ESG) performance. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 20(6), 965-985. https://doi.org/10.1108/cg-10-2019-0306 Harris, I. C., & Shimizu, K. (2004). Too busy to serve? An examination of the influence of overboarded directors. Journal of Management Studies, 41(5), 775-798. Hillman, A. J., & Dalziel, T. (2003). Boards of directors and firm performance: Integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives. Academy of management review, 28(3), 383-396. Jaskyte, K. (2012). Boards of directors and innovation in nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 22(4), 439-459. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.21039 Johnson, S. G., Schnatterly, K., & Hill, A. D. (2013). Board composition beyond independence: Social capital, human capital, and demographics. Journal of management, 39(1), 232-262. Kim, Y. (2005). Board network characteristics and firm performance in Korea. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 13(6), 800-808. Kim, Y., & Cannella, A. A. (2008). Toward a Social Capital Theory of Director Selection. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16(4), 282-293. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2008.00693.x Kohli, R., & Melville, N. P. (2019). Digital innovation: A review and synthesis. Information Systems Journal, 29(1), 200-223. Larcker, D. F., So, E. C., & Wang, C. C. (2010). Boardroom centrality and stock returns. Citeseer. Li, J., Li, M., Wang, X., & Thatcher, J. B. (2021). STRATEGIC DIRECTIONS FOR AI: THE ROLE OF CIOS AND BOARDS OF DIRECTORS. MIS Quarterly, 45(3). Lim, J.-H., Stratopoulos, T. C., & Wirjanto, T. S. (2013). Sustainability of a firm's reputation for information technology capability: The role of senior IT executives. Journal of Management Information Systems, 30(1), 57-96. Loderer, C. F., & Waelchli, U. (2010). Firm age and performance. Available at SSRN 1342248. Manner, M. H. (2010). The impact of CEO characteristics on corporate social performance. Journal of business ethics, 93(1), 53-72. Moran, P., & Ghoshal, S. (1996). VALUE CREATION BY FIRMS. Academy of Management Proceedings, Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of management review, 23(2), 242-266. Nasiri, M., Saunila, M., Ukko, J., Rantala, T., & Rantanen, H. (2020). Shaping digital innovation via digital-related capabilities. Information Systems Frontiers, 1-18. Newman, M. E. (2008). The mathematics of networks. The new palgrave encyclopedia of economics, 2(2008), 1-12. Nylén, D., & Holmström, J. (2015). Digital innovation strategy: A framework for diagnosing and improving digital product and service innovation. Business Horizons, 58(1), 57-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2014.09.001 Phelps, C. C. (2010). A longitudinal study of the influence of alliance network structure and composition on firm exploratory innovation. Academy of Management journal, 53(4), 890-913. Portes, A. (2009). Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Knowledge and social capital: Foundations and applications, 43-67. Rajagopalan, N., & Datta, D. K. (1996). CEO characteristics: does industry matter? Academy of Management journal, 39(1), 197-215. Ravichandran, T. (2018). Exploring the relationships between IT competence, innovation capacity and organizational agility. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 27(1), 22-42. Rindfleisch, A., & Moorman, C. (2001). The acquisition and utilization of information in new product alliances: A strength-of-ties perspective. Journal of Marketing, 65(2), 1-18. Sarto, F., Saggese, S., Viganò, R., & Mauro, M. (2019). Human capital and innovation: mixing apples and oranges on the board of high-tech firms. Management Decision, 58(5), 897-926. https://doi.org/10.1108/md-06-2017-0594 Sauerwald, S., Lin, Z., & Peng, M. W. (2016). Board social capital and excess CEO returns. Strategic Management Journal, 37(3), 498-520. Siemsen, E., Roth, A. V., & Balasubramanian, S. (2008). How motivation, opportunity, and ability drive knowledge sharing: The constraining-factor model. Journal of Operations Management, 26(3), 426-445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2007.09.001 Sánchez, L. P.-C., & Barroso-Castro, C. (2015). It is useful to consider the interlocks according to the type of board member (executive or non-executive) who posseses them? Their effect on firm performance. Revista Europea de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa, 24(3), 130-137. Srinivasan, R., Wuyts, S., & Mallapragada, G. (2018). Corporate Board Interlocks and New Product Introductions. Journal of Marketing, 82(1), 132-148. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.16.0120 Stevenson, W. B., & Radin, R. F. (2009). Social capital and social influence on the board of directors. Journal of Management Studies, 46(1), 16-44. Van Peteghem, M., Joshi, A., Mithas, S., Bollen, L., & De Haes, S. (2019). Board IT competence and firm performance. Fortieth International Conference on Information Systems, December 15-18, 2019, Munich, Germany, Ver Hoef, J. M., & Boveng, P. L. (2007). Quasi‐Poisson vs. negative binomial regression: how should we model overdispersed count data? Ecology, 88(11), 2766-2772. Wang, H., Zhao, J., Li, Y., & Li, C. (2015). Network centrality, organizational innovation, and performance: A meta-analysis. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences / Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l'Administration, 32(3), 146-159. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjas.1316 Wang, R., Gupta, A., & Grewal, R. (2017). Mobility of top marketing and sales executives in business-to-business markets: A social network perspective. Journal of Marketing Research, 54(4), 650-670. Wincent, J., Anokhin, S., & Örtqvist, D. (2010). Does network board capital matter? A study of innovative performance in strategic SME networks. Journal of Business Research, 63(3), 265-275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.03.012 Wu, H.-L. (2008). When does internal governance make firms innovative? Journal of Business Research, 61(2), 141-153. Wu, H.-L., & Lee, C.-Y. (2007). The effects of board competence on operational innovation: tests of universal, contingency and configurational models. International Journal of Technology Management, 39(3-4), 330-345. Zhang, P., Zhao, K., & Kumar, R. L. (2016). Impact of IT governance and IT capability on firm performance. Information Systems Management, 33(4), 357-373. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/86143 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 現今許多公司正在追求數位創新，然而，董事會對數位創新的影響卻尚未明瞭，為了解決這個研究缺口，本研究著重於董事會的連結網絡中心性，也就是董事會成員連結到其他公司董事會的程度，對數位創新的影響。根據社會資本理論，本研究主張連結網絡越中心的董事會，越能夠享有資訊利益，創造更 多數位創新的機會。而利用動機-機會-能力模型，我們更進一步主張董事會的兩個領導方面的因素會影響上述關係，董事會內部領導力和董事會資訊科技領導力。 為了檢驗假說，本研究收集2009年至2014年，在資訊與通信產業的公司資料，包括從BoardEx資料庫收集董事會有關的資料，從NBER收集有關專利的資料，以及從Compustat收集公司金融相關的資料。本研究結果顯示董事會連結網絡中心性正向顯著地影響數位創新，且此關係被董事會內部資訊科技領 導力正向調節，但是被董事會內部領導力和董事會外部同產業領導力負向調節。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Many companies are trying to apply digital innovation. However, the impact of boards on digital innovation, a top-down influence of a firm’s leadership, has been overlooked. To address this gap, we focus on the effect of the firm’s board interlock network centrality, the extent to which the board of directors is connected to boards of other firms, on its digital innovation. Based on social capital theory, we propose that board interlock network centrality provides firms with IT information benefits, creating opportunities to develop digital innovation. Applying the motivationopportunity-ability model, we further propose that the two aspects of board leadership moderate this relationship: internal (vs. external) leadership and IT leadership. To examine our hypotheses, we collected board data from BoardEx, patent data from NBER, and financial data from Compustat of firms in the ICT industry from 2009 to 2013. Our results show the significant and positive relationship between board interlock network centrality and digital innovation, and this relationship is positively moderated by IT internal leadership. Yet, the effect is weaker when firms have high internal leadership and external intra-industry leadership. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2023-03-19T23:38:53Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 U0001-0409202216110100.pdf: 987068 bytes, checksum: a2e793284bf538c8e89ffcf4b1c70627 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2022 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 論文口試委員會審定書 ⅰ 致謝 ⅱ 摘要 ⅲ Abstract ⅳ Content ⅴ List of Tables VIII List of Figures IX 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Background 1 1.2 Research Objectives 2 1.3 Contribution 4 2 Literature Review 4 2.1 Social Capital Theory 5 2.2 Digital Innovation 6 2.3 Corporate Board 7 2.4 Board External Social Capital 8 2.5 Interlock Network Centrality 9 2.6 MOA model 10 3 Research Hypothesis 10 3.1 Research Model 11 3.2 Main Effect of Board Interlock Centrality 12 3.2.1 Centrality and IT information 12 3.2.2 IT Information and Digital Innovation 13 3.3 Moderating Effects of leadership on the Board 14 3.3.1 Internal (vs. External) Leadership on the Board 15 3.3.2 IT Leadership on the Board 18 4 Methodology 20 4.1 Data 20 4.2 Measures 21 4.2.1 Dependent Variable 21 4.2.2 Independent Variable 22 4.2.3 Moderators 24 4.3 Control Variables 25 4.4 Model Specification 27 5 Results 29 6 Discussion 33 6.1 Theoretical Contributions 35 6.2 Managerial Contributions 35 7 Conclusion 36 7.1 Summary 36 7.2 Limitations and Future Works 37 References 40 Appendix 50 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.subject | 數位創新 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 公司治理 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 董事會連結網絡 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 網絡中心性 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 董事會連結 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | network centrality | en |
| dc.subject | digital innovation | en |
| dc.subject | corporate governance | en |
| dc.subject | board interlocks | en |
| dc.subject | interlock network | en |
| dc.title | 董事會連結網絡與數位創新之關係 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Board Interlock Network and Digital Innovation | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 110-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.coadvisor | 彭志宏(Chih-Hung Peng) | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 魏志平(Chih-Ping Wei) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 數位創新,公司治理,董事會連結,董事會連結網絡,網絡中心性, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | digital innovation,corporate governance,board interlocks,interlock network,network centrality, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 50 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202203131 | |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2022-09-07 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 資訊管理學研究所 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2022-09-23 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 資訊管理學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| U0001-0409202216110100.pdf | 963.93 kB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。