Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 文學院
  3. 哲學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/86117
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor蔡耀明(Yao-Ming Tsai)
dc.contributor.authorZyo Chienen
dc.contributor.author簡至佑zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-19T23:37:38Z-
dc.date.copyright2022-09-13
dc.date.issued2022
dc.date.submitted2022-09-08
dc.identifier.citation《長阿含經》,後秦.佛陀耶舍共竺佛念譯,收錄在《大正藏》第1冊。 《中阿含經》,東晉.瞿曇僧伽提婆譯,收錄在《大正藏》第1冊。 《雜阿含經》,劉宋.求那跋陀羅譯,收錄在《大正藏》第2冊。 《增壹阿含經》,東晉.瞿曇僧伽提婆譯,收錄在《大正藏》第2冊。 葉少勇,《中論頌──梵藏漢合校、導讀、譯註》,上海:中西書局,2011。 蔡耀明,《世界文明原典選讀 Ⅴ: 佛教文明經典》,新北:立緒文化,2017。 釋洞恆,《佛教禪法之研究:依據巴利《尼卡雅》及漢譯《阿含經》》,臺北:秀威資訊,2014。 Kantor, Hans-Rudolf,〈虛假當念之時間構造──以天臺宗及華嚴宗為主〉,《臺大佛學研究》(2008),頁171-228。 蔡耀明,〈《中論.觀時品》 時間哲學之研究〉,《正觀雜誌》第93期(2020),頁5-36。 ———,〈佛教弘化視野的時空、認同、歸屬、自我〉,《圓光佛學學報》第34期(2019),頁195-227。 ———,〈《 大方廣佛華嚴經》的時空哲學〉,《法鼓佛學學報》第21期(2017),頁47-72。 ———,〈佛教「八解脫」之解脫學理的探究〉,《揭諦:南華大學哲學與生命教 育學學報》第24期(2013年1月),頁201-266。 嚴瑋泓,〈「迦羅」(Kala)或「三摩耶」(Samaya)?──以「時間」議題論《大智度論》批判實在論的哲學問題〉,《臺大佛學研究》(2010),頁1-57。 'Anguttara-Nikaya of the Sutta-Pitaka.' edited by Rev Morris. London: Pali Text Society, 1885. 'Digha-Nikaya of the Sutta-Pitaka.' edited by Thomas William Rhys Davids and Joseph Estlin Carpenter. London: Pali Text Society, 1885. 'Majjhima-Nikaya.' edited by Vilhelm Trenckner and Robert Chalmers. London: Pali Text Society, 1888. 'Samyutta-Nikaya of the Sutta-Pitaka.' edited by M Leon Feer. London: Pali Text Society, 1890. Bronkhorst, Johannes. Greater Magadha: Studies in the Culture of Early India. Brill, 2007. Maudlin, Tim. Philosophy of Physics. Princeton University Press, 2012. Mellor, David Hugh. Real Time. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981. Nattier, Jan. Once Upon a Future Time: Studies in a Buddhist Prophecy of Decline. Vol. 1: Jain Publishing Company, 1991. Oaklander, L Nathan. The Ontology of Time. Amherst: Prometheus Books, 2004. Oppy, Graham, and Michael Scott. Reading Philosophy of Religion. John Wiley & Sons, 2010. Prosser, Simon. Experiencing Time. Oxford University Press, 2016. Siderits, Mark, and Shōryū Katsura. 'Chapter 19: An Analysis of Time.' In Nāgārjuna’s Middle Way: The Mūlamadhyamakakārikā, 207-11. Boston: Wisdom Publications, 2013. Analayo, Bhikkhu. 'The'sixty-Two Views'–a Comparative Study.' 福嚴佛學研究= Fuyan Buddhist Studies, no. 5 (2010): 23-42. Brink, David O. 'Prudence and Authenticity: Intrapersonal Conflicts of Value.' The Philosophical Review 112, no. 2 (2003): 215-45. Callender, Craig. 'The Common Now.' Philosophical issues 18 (2008): 339-61. Dessein, Bart. 'Time, Temporality, and the Characteristic Marks of the Conditioned: Sarvāstivāda and Madhyamaka Buddhist Interpretations.' Asian Philosophy 21, no. 4 (2011): 341-60. Fine, Kit. 'The Reality of Tense.' Synthese (2006): 399-414. Inada, Kenneth K. 'Time and Temporality: A Buddhist Approach.' Philosophy East and West 24, no. 2 (1974): 171-79. Kalupahana, David J. 'The Buddhist Conception of Time and Temporality.' Philosophy East and West 24, no. 2 (1974): 181-91. Koller, John M. 'On Buddhist Views of Devouring Time.' Philosophy East and West 24, no. 2 (1974): 201-08. McTaggart, J Ellis. 'The Unreality of Time.' Mind (1908): 457-74. Miller, Kristie. 'A Taxonomy of Views About Time in Buddhist and Western Philosophy.' Philosophy East and West 67, no. 3 (2017): 763-82. Prior, Arthur N. 'Thank Goodness That's Over.' Philosophy 34, no. 128 (1959): 12-17. Skow, Bradford. 'Experience and the Passage of Time.' Philosophical Perspectives 25 (2011): 359-87. Thapar, Romila. 'Cyclic and Linear Time in Early India.' Museum International 57, no. 3 (2005): 19-31. Tsai, Yao-ming. 'An Examination of Temporality in Mindfulness Meditation.' 불교학 리뷰 28 (2020): 9-31. Wasserman, Ryan. Paradoxes of Time Travel. Oxford University Press, 2018. Coseru, Christian. 'Whose Consciousness? Reflexivity and the Problem of Self-Knowledge.' In Buddhist Philosophy of Consciousness, edited by Mark Siderits, Ching Keng and John Spackman, 121-53: Brill, 2020. Ruseva, Gergana Rumenova. 'Time in Early Buddhism.' In Retelling Time: Alternative Temporalities from Premodern South Asia, edited by Shonaleeka Kaul: Taylor & Francis, 2021.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/86117-
dc.description.abstract本文嘗試以阿含經典為依據,建構聲聞乘的時間哲學理路。在學界中,關於佛教時間哲學的研究成果甚豐。然而,其多數都是基於佛教部派學說或論典,以經典內容與解脫學條理為依據的研究較為少見。阿含經典是了解聲聞乘修行理路相當重要的入手材料,當中討論的「空性」與「解脫」等重要概念也是佛學研究的共同基礎。以阿含經為入手材料,在佛教時間哲學研究中有其必要。 本文以「時間空」與「究竟解脫」兩個重要觀念的討論入手。「時間空」指時間之空性,用以說明時間之根本情形為空。透過關聯於空性的考察、思惟以及修行,聲聞乘修行者得以達成「究竟解脫」,度脫生死輪迴。時間之空性的考察,關聯時間形上學以及時間經驗的討論。究竟解脫的境界,使證得最高果位的修行者不見時間現象。解脫之情形為佛陀施設修行理路的重要基礎,也是時間空此宣稱得以成立的重要依據。 藉經典內容的分析以及時間哲學論題的探究,本文嘗試論證要點有三。其一,佛教的時間觀為一緣起的時間觀。此環節中,分別釐清線性時間觀以及循環時間觀兩組概念,並說明這兩者皆不適用聲聞乘的時間觀。以緣起的時間觀作為說明較為適切。其二,時間之非實在性。同時從形上學討論與時間經驗的哲學討論入手,搭配緣起觀考察時間實在性概念。藉由分析構成時間之條件以及解開時間現象的知覺歷程,說明時間的實在性宣稱並非恰當。其三,時間是可被超脫的。時間為世間現象的一部份,且聲聞乘修行者最高境界為解脫世間,則時間得以超脫的原理在阿含經典的討論範圍內。超脫時間的理路,從時間邊際的形上學分析以及解脫道次第的考察入手。修行者達成解脫時得以在根本上不見時間,此作為「時間空」於知見層面的重要基礎。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThis paper attempts to construct a philosophical theory of time based on the Āgama sūtras. There is a wealth of scholarly research on Buddhist philosophy of time. However, most of them are focused on Buddhist schools' doctrines or treatises, while studies in the light of Buddhist sūtras and the teachings of liberation are rare. The Āgama sūtras are an important starting point for understanding the practice of the Śrāvakayāna (vehicle of disciples), and the important concepts such as 'emptiness' and 'liberation' discussed therein are also common bases for Buddhist studies. It is necessary to begin the study of Buddhist philosophy of time by using the Āgama sūtras as primary source. This paper focuses on two important ideas – 'emptiness of time' and 'nirvanic liberation'. The emptiness of time is used to describe the fundamental condition of time as emptiness. By examining, contemplating, and putting this idea into practice, a Buddhist practitioner is able to achieve 'nirvanic liberation' from the cycle of birth and death(saṃsāra). The examination of the emptiness of time is also important to the discussion of metaphysics of time and the temporal experience. The state of nirvanic liberation enables the practitioner attaining the arhantship not to perceive the phenomena of time. The scenario of liberation is an important basis for Buddha's practice, and it also grounds the assertion that time is empty. By analyzing the sūtras and exploring the philosophical issues of time, this paper attempts to justify three points. First, the Buddhist view of time is a karmic view of time. In this section, two sets of concepts, linear and cyclical, are defined resepectively, and both are shown to be irrelevant to the Buddhist view of time. It is therefore appropriate to use the karmic view of time as an illustration. Second, the unreality of time. The concept of temporal reality is examined in the context of the karmic view, along with the discussions of metaphysics and the temporal experience. Through the analysis of time and the unraveling of the process of perceiving temporal phenomena, it is shown that the claim of the reality of time is no longer preferable. Third, time could be transcended. Since time is also part of the phenomena of the world, and the highest state of a Śrāvakayāna practitioner is to be freed from the world, the principle of transcendence of time is within the scope of the Āgama sūtras. The principle of transcendence of time is discussed in the Āgama sūtras. The path towards transcendence of time proceeds by analyzing the metaphysics of the edge of time and by examining the path to liberation. Being able to attain liberation and not to perceive time is an important foundation for the 'emptiness of time' at the level of knowledge.en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2023-03-19T23:37:38Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
U0001-0709202223001400.pdf: 2218268 bytes, checksum: 8624aca2340eb9110106d0930f0496dc (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2022
en
dc.description.tableofcontents口試委員審定書 i 謝辭 ii 摘要 iv Abstract v 目次 vii 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究主題與進路 1 第二節 文獻依據 2 第三節 研究背景與目標 3 第四節 研究架構 4 第二章 背景觀念說明 6 第一節 何謂時間與時間哲學 6 第二節 聲聞乘及其修行理路 7 第三節 因緣推動而成變化 10 一、 緣起與空性 10 二、 十二緣起 12 第四節 認知世間之取角 15 一、 六入處與十八界 15 二、 非我 19 第五節 基於空性設置生命解脫之道 21 第三章 緣起的生命時間觀 26 第一節 生死之相續不斷 26 一、 一期生命僅為生命相續的波段 27 二、 解開生命為相續之情形 29 三、 輪迴作為生死不斷之說明 34 第二節 輪迴既非線性也非循環 36 一、 線性時間觀與循環時間觀 36 二、 循環時間觀隱含我見 37 三、 既非線性也非循環的「緣起」時間觀 38 第三節 小結 41 第四章 時間是空的 ──阿含經典為依據之形上學考察 42 第一節 聲聞乘的時間形上學理路探析 42 一、 著眼緣起與性空的形上學考察 43 二、 文獻回顧 44 第二節 時間並非實在的 48 一、 時態實在性與相對性之爭 48 二、 以緣起觀檢視時態實在性論斷 49 第三節 時間之邊際 53 一、 奇異點為時空之邊際 54 二、 藉止息困苦越過時空邊際 54 第四節 小結 58 第五章 了知時間之空性 ──從時間經驗到涅槃境界 59 第一節 聲聞乘對知覺的考察 59 一、 考察知覺條件並深入其緣起情形 60 二、 從修行義理反思世間知見的依據 63 第二節 以空觀檢視時間現象 64 一、 何謂時間經驗 64 二、 時間現象僅為心智建構而非本身實在 65 三、 面對「不同時間」而能「無有分別」 69 第三節 由解脫而來的知見洞察時間根本為空 77 一、 洞察時間之空性的方式 77 二、 解脫世間而不見時間 79 第四節 小結 82 第六章 結論 84 縮寫與引文標示對照 87 參考書目 88
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.subject時間邊際zh_TW
dc.subject時間空zh_TW
dc.subject解脫zh_TW
dc.subject佛教時間觀zh_TW
dc.subject阿含經zh_TW
dc.subject時間哲學zh_TW
dc.subjectĀgama sūtrasen
dc.subjectthe edge of timeen
dc.subjectphilosophy of timeen
dc.subjectthe emptiness of timeen
dc.subjectBuddhist liberaitonen
dc.subjectBuddhist concept of timeen
dc.title從時間空到究竟解脫──阿含經典為依據之時間哲學探究zh_TW
dc.titleFrom the Emptiness of Time to Nirvanic Liberation: An Inquiry into Philosophy of Time Based on the Āgama sūtrasen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear110-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee嚴瑋泓(WEI-HUNG YEN),周先捷(Nihel H. Jhou)
dc.subject.keyword時間空,解脫,佛教時間觀,阿含經,時間哲學,時間邊際,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordthe emptiness of time,Buddhist liberaiton,Buddhist concept of time,Āgama sūtras,philosophy of time,the edge of time,en
dc.relation.page91
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU202203240
dc.rights.note同意授權(全球公開)
dc.date.accepted2022-09-08
dc.contributor.author-college文學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept哲學研究所zh_TW
dc.date.embargo-lift2022-09-13-
顯示於系所單位:哲學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
U0001-0709202223001400.pdf2.17 MBAdobe PDF檢視/開啟
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved