請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/85996完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 謝吉隆(Ji-Long Hsieh) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Kuan-Hsien Wu | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 吳冠賢 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-03-19T23:32:08Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2022-09-30 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2022 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2022-09-19 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Abbott, D. A., Ming, Z. F., & Meredith, W. H. (1992). An evolving redefinition of the fatherhood role in the People's Republic of China. International Journal of Sociology of the family, 45-54. Adams, M., Walker, C., & O’Connell, P. (2011). Invisible or involved fathers? A content analysis of representations of parenting in young children’s picturebooks in the UK. Sex Roles, 65(3-4), 259-270. Anderson, D. A., & Hamilton, M. (2005). Gender role stereotyping of parents in children’s picture books: The invisible father. Sex roles, 52(3-4), 145-151. Ammari, T., & Schoenebeck, S. (2015, April). Understanding and supporting fathers and fatherhood on social media sites. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1905-1914). Assarsson, L., & Aarsand, P. (2011). ‘How to be good’: Media representations of parenting. Studies in the Education of Adults, 43(1), 78-92. Aunkofer, S., Meuser, M., & Neuman, B. W. (2018). Couples and companies: Negotiating fathers’ participation in parental leave in Germany. RES. Revista Española de Sociología, 27(3), 65-81. Borgkvist, A., Eliott, J., Crabb, S., & Moore, V. (2020). “Unfortunately I’ma Massively Heavy Sleeper”: An Analysis of Fathers’ Constructions of Parenting. Men and Masculinities, 23(3-4), 680-701. Bouma, G. (2009). Normalized (pointwise) mutual information in collocation extraction. Proceedings of GSCL, 30, 31-40. Brandth, B., & Kvande, E. (2009). Gendered or gender-neutral care politics for fathers?. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 624(1), 177-189. Charmaz, K. (2006). The power of names. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 35(4), 396-399. Chuang, J., Manning, C. D., & Heer, J. (2012, May). Termite: Visualization techniques for assessing textual topic models. Proceedings of the international working conference on advanced visual interfaces (pp. 74-77). Chung, K. S. (2006). 1.8 Simplex, complex and compound verbs; pure verbs. Mandarin compound verbs, p. 22-6. Wen He Chuban Youxian Gongsi. De Beauvoir, S. (2010). The second sex. Knopf. Doherty, W. J., Kouneski, E. F., & Erickson, M. F. (1998). Responsible fathering: An overview and conceptual framework. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 277-292. Garg, N., Schiebinger, L., Jurafsky, D., & Zou, J. (2018). Word embeddings quantify 100 years of gender and ethnic stereotypes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(16), E3635-E3644. Gorman-Murray, A., & Hopkins, P. (Eds.). (2014). Masculinities and place. Surrey, UK: Ashgate. Gregory, A., & Milner, S. (2011). What is “new” about fatherhood? The social construction of fatherhood in France and the UK. Men and masculinities, 14(5), 588-606. Hardie, A. (2014, Apr. 28). Log Ratio – an informal introduction. ESRC Centre for Corpus Approaches to Social Science (CASS). Blogs. http://cass.lancs.ac.uk/log-ratio-an-informal-introduction/ Hattori, M. (2020). Masculinity of fatherhood in Japanese news media. Holmes, J & Wilson, N. (2017). Chapter 12 Gender, politeness and stereotypes. An Introduction to Social Linguistics, pp. 322 - 58. Routledge. Hong, L., & Davison, B. D. (2010, July). Empirical study of topic modeling in twitter. In Proceedings of the first workshop on social media analytics (pp. 80-88). Hsu, C. C. (2021). Categorization as appraisal: Using classificatory verbs in Chinese for evaluative purposes. Journal of Pragmatics, 184, 107-118. Ives, P. (2004). 3. Language and Hegemony in the Prison Notebooks. Language and hegemony in Gramsci (pp. 63-101). London: Pluto Press. Jelodar, H., Wang, Y., Yuan, C., Feng, X., Jiang, X., Li, Y., & Zhao, L. (2019). Latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA) and topic modeling: models, applications, a survey. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 78(11), 15169-15211. Jensen, J. K., Ammari, T., & Bjørn, P. (2019). Into Scandinavia: When Online Fatherhood Reflects Societal Infrastructures. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 3(GROUP), 1-21. Jordan, A. (2020). Masculinizing Care? Gender, Ethics of Care, and Fathers’ Rights Groups. Men and Masculinities, 23(1), 20–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X18776364 Kangas, E., Lämsä, A. M., & Jyrkinen, M. (2019). Is fatherhood allowed? Media discourses of fatherhood in organizational life. Gender, Work & Organization, 26(10), 1433-1450. Kapadia, S. (2019, Aug. 19). Evaluate Topic Models: Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA): A step-by-step guide to building interpretable topic models. Towards Data Science. https://towardsdatascience.com/evaluate-topic-model-in-python-latent-dirichlet-allocation-lda-7d57484bb5d0 Locke, A., & Yarwood, G. (2017). Exploring the depths of gender, parenting and ‘work’: critical discursive psychology and the ‘missing voices’ of involved fatherhood. Community, Work & Family, 20(1), 4-18. Lupton, D., Barclay, L. (1997). Constructing fatherhood: Discourses and experiences. London: SAGE Publ. Mackenzie, J. (2018). ‘Good mums don’t, apparently, wear make-up’: negotiating discourses of gendered parenthood in Mumsnet Talk. Gender and Language, 12(1). Manning, C., & Schütze, H. (1999). Collocations. Foundations of statistical natural language processing. Cambridge, MA. Marsiglio, W., & Pleck, J. H. (2005). Fatherhood and masculinities. The handbook of studies on men and masculinities, 249-269. McLeod PhD, MSW, B. A. (2020). “Hello group, I need advice”: A Textual Analysis of Black Fathers' Help‐Seeking Posts on Facebook. Family Relations, 69(5), 944-955. Mintz, S. (1998). From patriarchy to androgyny and other myths: Placing men's family roles in historical perspective. Men in families: When do they get involved? What difference does it make?, 1. Nash, M. (2018). “It’s just good to get a bit of man-talk out in the open”: Men’s experiences of father-only antenatal preparation classes in Tasmania, Australia. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 19(2), 298. Nordic gender equality indicators. Nordic Statistics database. (2018, November 9). https://www.nordicstatistics.org/nordic-gender-equality-indicators/. O'Brien, M. (2009). Fathers, parental leave policies, and infant quality of life: International perspectives and policy impact. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 624(1), 190-213. Oxford University Press. (n.d.) Patriarchy. Oxford English dictionary. Retrieved December 30, 2021, from oed.com/view/Entry/138873?redirectedFrom=patriarchy#eid Pelgrim, R. (2021, Jun. 17). Short-Text Topic Modelling: LDA vs GSDMM. Medium. https://towardsdatascience.com/short-text-topic-modelling-lda-vs-gsdmm-20f1db742e14 Petroski, D. J., & Edley, P. P. (2006). Stay-at-home fathers: Masculinity, family, work, and gender stereotypes. Electronic Journal of Communication, 16(3/4). Ramos, J. (2003, December). Using tf-idf to determine word relevance in document queries. In Proceedings of the first instructional conference on machine learning (Vol. 242, No. 1, pp. 29-48). Regulations for Implementing Unpaid Parental Leave for Raising Children. (2021) Röder, M., Both, A., & Hinneburg, A. (2015, February). Exploring the space of topic coherence measures. In Proceedings of the eighth ACM international conference on Web search and data mining (pp. 399-408). Sarkar, D. (2018, Mar. 14). A hands-on intuitive approach to Deep Learning Methods for Text Data — Word2Vec, GloVe and FastText. Towards Data Science. https://towardsdatascience.com/understanding-feature-engineering-part-4-deep-learning-methods-for-text-data-96c44370bbfa Scheibling, C. (2020). Doing Fatherhood Online: Men's Parental Identities, Experiences, and Ideologies on Social Media. Symbolic Interaction, 43(3), 472-492. Scheibling, C. (2020). “Real heroes care”: How dad bloggers are reconstructing fatherhood and masculinities. Men and Masculinities, 23(1), 3-19. Schmitz, R. M. (2016). Constructing Men as Fathers: A Content Analysis of Formulations of Fatherhood in Parenting Magazines. The Journal of Men’s Studies, 24(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/1060826515624381 Sievert, C., & Shirley, K. (2014, June). LDAvis: A method for visualizing and interpreting topics. Proceedings of the workshop on interactive language learning, visualization, and interfaces (pp. 63-70). Silge, J., & Robinson, D. (2017). Text mining with R: A tidy approach. ' O'Reilly Media, Inc.'. Storey, J. (2012). 4 Marxisms. Cultural theory and popular culture: an introduction, 59-92. Storey, J. (2012). 6 Structuralism and Post-structuralism. Cultural theory and popular culture: an introduction, 113-136. Sunderland, J. (2000). Baby entertainer, bumbling assistant and line manager: Discourses of fatherhood in parentcraft texts. Discourse & Society, 11(2), 249-274. Sunderland, J. (2006). ‘Parenting’or ‘mothering’? The case of modern childcare magazines. Discourse & Society, 17(4), 503-528. Thompson, L., & Walker, A. J. (1989). Gender in families: Women and men in marriage, work, and parenthood. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 845-871. Tiitinen, S., & Ruusuvuori, J. (2015). Producing gendered parenthood in child health clinics. Discourse & Society, 26(1), 113-132. Tsai, W. H. S., & Shumow, M. (2011). Representing fatherhood and male domesticity in American advertising. Interdisciplinary Journal of Research in Business, 1(8), 38-48. van Dijk, Teun A. (1998). “Opinions and Ideologies in the Press”, in Allan Bell and Peter Garrett (eds.), Approaches to Media Discourse. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Pub. Pp.21-63. Wall, G., & Arnold, S. (2007). How involved is involved fathering? An exploration of the contemporary culture of fatherhood. Gender & Society, 21(4), 508-527. West, C. & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender and Society, 1(2), 125-151. Fiske, J. (2002). Introduction to Communication Studies(張錦華譯。台北,遠流出版社。Chapter 3. (Original work published 1982) V太太. (2020, Jul. 16). 都是迷因惹的禍?「哏圖」如何限制我們的想像?. 鳴人堂. https://opinion.udn.com/opinion/story/120732/4703578 王大維. (2000). “父職參與” 或 “參與親職的父親”?. 應用心理研究, (7), 12-18. 王舒芸, & 余漢儀. (1997). 奶爸難為-雙薪家庭之父職角色初探. 婦女與兩性學刊, (8), 115-149. 王叢桂. (2000). 促進參與父職因素的探討. 應用心理研究, 第6期. 尤美女、王如玄、張晉芬、嚴祥鸞、劉梅君、陳美華(1999),1999 催生男女工作平等法手冊,台北市:財團法人婦女新知基金會。 行政院總計處. (2016). 主計總處性別統計資料. 婦女婚育與就業調查. 李立如. (2003). 法不入家門? 家事法演變的法律社會學分析. 林思平. (2017). 網路八卦與真理政治: 批踢踢八卦板之閱聽人研究. 新聞學研究, (133), 135-188. 呂明心, 傅臨超, 邱玉蟬, & 闕河嘉. (2016). 男主外, 女 [煮] 內: 臺灣 [米] 電視廣告的性別形象. 傳播與發展學報, (33), 56-88. 海巡署長室. (2020 Jun. 27). 當孩子安靜的時候,可能有不好的事情發生了. [附圖] [Facebook圖文]. Facebook. https://www.facebook.com/CGA4U/photos/a.2265883060404277/2685727785086467/?type=3 陳志賢, & 楊巧玲. (2011). 為難父母, 父母難為:《聯合報》親職報導內容分析 (1978-2008 年). 新聞學研究, (106), 135-178. 陳志賢, & 楊巧玲. (2013). 新家庭的舊想像: 數位家庭之媒體報導內容分析. 高應科大人文社會科學學報, 10(2), 171-188. 陳富美, & 利翠珊. (2004). 夫妻的育兒經驗: 親職分工與共親職的探討. 中華心理衛生學刊, 17(4), 1-28. 郭美娟, & 陳若琳. (2012). 雙薪家庭幼兒父親的親職效能, 母親的教養鼓勵與父職參與之相關研究. 家庭教育與諮商學刊, (13), 57-79. 黃顯凱. (2021). 女性婚姻財產在法律上之演變. 全國律師, 25(9). 71-89. 勞動部. 勞動統計處. (2020). 育嬰留職停薪期滿復職關懷調查(109年). 勞動部勞工保險局, & 臺灣銀行. (2021). 育嬰留職停薪津貼核付情形-按保險類別及性別分. 勞動部. 勞動資訊補給站. 生育福利站. https://www.mol.gov.tw/23323/23325/ (Accessed 2, Aug., 2021). 游美惠. (2004). 性別權力與知識建構:《親職教育》教科書的論述分析. 女學學誌: 婦女與性別研究, (17), 1-45. 游美惠, & 易言嬡. (2004). 親職教育與性別平等教育-檢視親職教育通俗書籍的性別平等意識. 高雄師大學報, (16), 1-18. 楊運秀, 沈毅, & 汪志堅. (2014). 電視廣告中家庭成員角色形象之內容分析. 行銷評論, 11(2), 155-173. 趙蕙鈴. (2011). 平面媒體之 [新好爸爸] 論述及其父職政治的分析. 通識教育學報, (16), 73-106. 藍詩孟. (2021, Jul. 21). 好消息!PTT「大復活」增手機認證 免是台大生也能註冊. 三立新聞網. https://www.setn.com/News.aspx?NewsID=973010 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/85996 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 近幾十年來,「參與式父職」的觀念重塑了父親的形象。然而,參與式父職在實行上卻相當模糊,雙親各自被期待負擔的義務也仍稱不上性別平等。因此,本論文的研究目標,是以性別的觀點了解當代的臺灣父母如何理解以及描述父職的實行。 本研究旨在探索父職在PTT的Babymother版上的家長們用語言所建構出的父職樣貌。其中,父親、丈夫以及「隊友」的角色各自的語言建構是分析以及比較的重點。透過量化的方式,包含標題的相對頻率、詞彙頻率以及詞彙關聯,本研究將找出哪些主題、字詞以及概念與這些角色有較高關聯性。這些結果會再經過質化的分析解釋。最後,父親在本版的論述也將有質化的探索以及分析。本研究的分析會建立在王大維所提出的父職參與的定義架構。 研究發現,父親傳統的經濟功能對所有的父職角色仍然重要。父親的角色與關係面向以及育兒的行為有較大關聯,丈夫的角色則與支持母親的行為有較大的關係。「隊友」一詞幾乎等同於「丈夫」的使用以及意義,則更直接的反映了版上對於父親應該支持母親的期待。 本版的言談中透露,版上的父母親對於父職參與此一概念的接受度以及期待普遍很高。父親已經不能缺席對孩子的照顧以及情感上的聯繫。然而,他被期待的功能主要是能夠支持母親的「隊友」,而母親仍然是家中主要負責任的一方。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | The concept of “involved fatherhood” has reshaped the father image in recent decades. However, the concept has been ambiguous in real practice and the perceived duties of either parent are far from gender equal. Therefore, this paper intends to look into the practice of fatherhood described by Taiwanese parents through a gendered perspective. The language construct of fatherhood on the PTT Babymother forum is explored. The father, husband and “隊友” (teammate) roles are analyzed and compared for their respective constructs. Quantitatve methods including: relative subject frequencies, word frequencies and word associations are used to find topics, terms and concepts relevant to each role. The results will be analyzed qualitatively. A content analysis is also conducted on discourses made by fathers. A model proposed by 王大維 which includes internal realizations of parenthood rather than only behaviors is the base for my analyses. The research finds that the traditional function of the father to provide material support is associated with all of the main roles. The relational aspect of involved fatherhood and caring behavior to the child is more associated with the father role. Support of the mother is more associated with the husband role. The expectations of support is manifest in the accepted use of “隊友” (teammate) to be used almost synonymously with “husband”. The Babymother board shows that the idea of involved fatherhood is widely accepted and expected among these Taiwanese parents. Fathers can no longer be absent in physical caring and emotional connection. However, he is mainly seen as a “teammate” to support the mother, who still has to take charge of matters inside the home. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2023-03-19T23:32:08Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 U0001-1209202221230900.pdf: 4733961 bytes, checksum: 2ad1002095422c2e5d792f3e8e92dd7b (MD5) Previous issue date: 2022 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 致謝 i 摘要 ii Abstract iv Table of Contents vi List of Figures ix List of Tables xi Chapter 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Motivation 1 1.2 Research Background 2 1.2.1 Changes and Stigma in Ideal and Practice 4 1.2.2 Perceptions and Discourse of Parenthood, Old and New 6 1.3 Research Goals 8 Chapter 2 Literature Review 10 2.1 Gender Dichotomy in the Family 10 2.2 Shaping Fatherhood Ideas 12 2.3 Involved Fatherhood and the “Champion Teammate” 15 Chapter 3 Methods 24 3.1 Research Questions 24 3.2 Data 26 3.2.1 Data Selection and Cleaning 26 3.2.2 Data Coverage 29 3.3 Methodology and Theoretical Grounds 31 3.4 Analytical Strategies 33 3.4.1 Statistics and Frequency 33 3.4.2 Word Associations 35 3.4.3 Word Embeddings 35 Chapter 4 Results 38 4.1 Identifying Fatherhood on the Babymother board 38 4.1.1 Synonyms of the father 38 4.1.2 Themes on Fathering 46 4.2 A Father or Husband? 53 4.2.1 Text Subjects 54 4.2.2 Father and Husband Associations 67 4.2.3 Fatherhood as Family Relation 83 4.3 Different Kinds of “Teammates” 84 4.3.1 The “Teammate” 85 4.3.2 A Champion or a Pig? 92 4.3.3 “My Husband Counts as a Good Teammate” 106 4.4 “I’m Actually a Dad” 108 4.4.1 General Themes 110 4.4.2 The Father’s Discourses 112 Chapter 5 Conclusion 119 5.1 Fatherhood Discourses on the Babymother Board 119 5.2 Discussion 121 5.3 Limitations 123 REFERENCES 125 English References 125 Mandarin References 131 Appendix 134 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.subject | 親職 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 性別角色 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 父職 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 家庭關係 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 論述分析 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 文字探勘 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | PTT | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Text mining | en |
| dc.subject | Parenting | en |
| dc.subject | Gender roles | en |
| dc.subject | PTT | en |
| dc.subject | Family relations | en |
| dc.subject | Discourse analysis | en |
| dc.subject | Fathering | en |
| dc.title | 以數據觀點探索臺灣 PTT 母嬰板的參與式父職論述 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | A Data Driven Exploration on the Involved Fatherhood Discourse on the Babymother Forum in Taiwan | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 110-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 張錦華(Chin-Hwa Chang),葉德蘭(De-Lan Yeh) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 性別角色,親職,父職,家庭關係,論述分析,文字探勘,PTT, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Gender roles,Parenting,Fathering,Family relations,Discourse analysis,Text mining,PTT, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 154 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202203326 | |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2022-09-21 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 新聞研究所 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2022-09-30 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 新聞研究所 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| U0001-1209202221230900.pdf | 4.62 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
