Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 社會科學院
  3. 公共事務研究所
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/85851
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor劉康慧(Helen K. Liu)
dc.contributor.authorYUN-CHIEN WUen
dc.contributor.author吳芸謙zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-19T23:26:25Z-
dc.date.copyright2022-09-30
dc.date.issued2022
dc.date.submitted2022-09-26
dc.identifier.citation壹、中文部分 陳建仁,〈台灣防疫的成功關鍵與未來挑戰〉,取自:https://forum.ettoday.net/news/1984347#ixzz6wSRyX0T0,2021年05月18日。 科技部,〈陳建仁專訪 臺灣寫下防疫新典範〉,取自https://gase.most.ntu.edu.tw/articles/58?locale=zh-TW,2021年1月14日。 張怡(2020) 臺灣流行病學家陳建仁專訪. 衛福季刊 (26), 38-41. 簡宏偉, 吳麗芬, 洪振耀, 劉倢旻, 吳卓葳, & 林瑜. (2020). 大數據運用與隱私保護-手機定位資訊於防疫應用之法律問題研析. 國土及公共治理季刊, 8(3), 64-75. 李建良(2021),遊走在疫情熱點與人權紅線的數位足跡,取自:https://covid19.ascdc.tw/essay/148,2021年4月6日。 朱斌妤, 黃仟文, & 翁少白. (2008). 以科技接受模式探討即時交通資訊系統之使用意願. 電子商務學報, 10(1), 173-200. 邱皓政. 量化研究與統計分析 : SPSS中文視窗版資料分析範例解析 / 邱皓政著. 二版. 台北市: 五南, 2002. 黃紀,2020,〈調查研究設計〉,載於《民意調查》,陳陸輝主編,台北,五南圖書出版公司,頁87-90。 余振華,2020,〈網路民意調查的理論與實務〉,載於《民意調查》,陳陸輝主編,台北,五南圖書出版公司,頁101-102。 貳、西文部分 Clark, E., Chiao, E. Y., & Amirian, E. S. (2021). Why contact tracing efforts have failed to curb coronavirus disease 2019 (covid-19) transmission in much of the united states. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 72(9), e415-e419. Prakash, A. V., & Das, S. (2022). Explaining citizens’ resistance to use digital contact tracing apps: A mixed-methods study. International Journal of Information Management, 63, 102468. Ferretti, L., Wymant, C., Kendall, M., Zhao, L., Nurtay, A., Abeler-Dörner, L., ... & Fraser, C. (2020). Quantifying SARS-CoV-2 transmission suggests epidemic control with digital contact tracing. Science, 368(6491). Kahn, J. P. (Ed.). (2020). Digital contact tracing for pandemic response: Ethics and governance guidance. Johns Hopkins University Press. World Health Organization. (2019). Non-pharmaceutical public health measures for mitigating the risk and impact of epidemic and pandemic influenza: annex: report of systematic literature reviews (No. WHO/WHE/IHM/GIP/2019.1). World Health Organization. Adopted from Khasawneh, O. Y. (2018). Technophobia: Examining its hidden factors and defining it. Technology in Society, 54(1), 93-100. World Health Organization.(2020a) Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) situation report—48. Published March 8, 2020. Accessed April 5. https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/20200308-sitrep-48-covid-19.pdf?sfvrsn=16f7ccef_4 World Health Organization. (2020b). Contact tracing in the context of COVID-19: interim guidance, 10 May 2020 (No. WHO/2019-nCoV/Contact_Tracing/2020.1). World Health Organization. (2020c). Digital tools for COVID-19 contact tracing: annex: contact tracing in the context of COVID-19, 2 June 2020 Eames, K. T., & Keeling, M. J. (2003). Contact tracing and disease control. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 270(1533), 2565-2571. Cohen, I. G., Gostin, L. O., & Weitzner, D. J. (2020). Digital smartphone tracking for COVID-19: public health and civil liberties in tension. Jama, 323(23), 2371-2372. Kleinman, R. A., & Merkel, C. (2020). Digital contact tracing for COVID-19. CMAJ, 192(24), E653-E656. Williams, S. N., Armitage, C. J., Tampe, T., & Dienes, K. (2021). Public attitudes towards COVID‐19 contact tracing apps: A UK‐based focus group study. Health Expectations, 24(2), 377-385. World Health Organization. (2021). Contact tracing in the context of COVID-19: interim guidance, 1 February 2021 (No. WHO/2019-nCoV/Contact_Tracing/2021.1). Hellewell, J., Abbott, S., Gimma, A., Bosse, N. I., Jarvis, C. I., Russell, T. W., ... & Eggo, R. M. (2020). Feasibility of controlling COVID-19 outbreaks by isolation of cases and contacts. The Lancet Global Health, 8(4), e488-e496. Huang, Z., Guo, H., Lee, Y. M., Ho, E. C., Ang, H., & Chow, A. (2020). Performance of digital contact tracing tools for COVID-19 response in Singapore: cross-sectional study. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 8(10), e23148. Altmann, S., Milsom, L., Zillessen, H., Blasone, R., Gerdon, F., Bach, R., ... & Abeler, J. (2020). Acceptability of app-based contact tracing for COVID-19: Cross-country survey study. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 8(8), e19857. Anglemyer, A., Moore, T. H., Parker, L., Chambers, T., Grady, A., Chiu, K., ... & Bero, L. (2020). Digital contact tracing technologies in epidemics: a rapid review. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (8). Gostin, L. O., & Hodge Jr, J. G. (1998). Piercing the veil of secrecy in HIV/AIDS and other sexually transmitted diseases: theories of privacy and disclosure in partner notification. Duke J. Gender L. & Pol'y, 5, 9. Soper, G. A. (1939). The curious career of Typhoid Mary. Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 15(10), 698. Manela, E. (2010). A pox on your narrative: writing disease control into Cold War history. Diplomatic History, 34(2), 299-323. Hopkins, J. W. (1988). The eradication of smallpox: organizational learning and innovation in international health administration. The Journal of Developing Areas, 22(3), 321-332. Fairchild, A. L., Colgrove, J., & Bayer, R. (2003). The myth of exceptionalism: the history of venereal disease reporting in the twentieth century. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 31(4), 624-637. Béland, D., Howard, C., & Morgan, K. J. (Eds.). (2015). The Oxford Handbook of US Social Policy. Oxford Handbooks. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.(2019, December 2). Ring Vaccination. https://www.cdc.gov/smallpox/bioterrorism-response-planning/public-health/ring-vaccination.html Brandt, A. M. (1990). Sexually transmitted disease: shadow on the land, revisited. Annals of internal Medicine, 112(7), 481-483. Fairchild, A. L., Gostin, L. O., & Bayer, R. (2020). Contact tracing’s long, turbulent history holds lessons for COVID-19. Ohio State University News. Francis, J. G., & Francis, L. P. (2021). Case Identification and Contact Tracing. Sustaining Surveillance: The Importance of Information for Public Health, 6, 51–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63928-0_3 Sean Bland(2020, July 13). REFLECTIONS ON THE HISTORY OF CONTACT TRACING. O’Neill Institute for National and Global Health Law. https://oneill.law.georgetown.edu/reflections-on-the-history-of-contact-tracing/ Danquah, L. O., Hasham, N., MacFarlane, M., Conteh, F. E., Momoh, F., Tedesco, A. A., ... & Weiss, H. A. (2019). Use of a mobile application for Ebola contact tracing and monitoring in northern Sierra Leone: a proof-of-concept study. BMC infectious diseases, 19(1), 1-12. Sacks, J. A., Zehe, E., Redick, C., Bah, A., Cowger, K., Camara, M., ... & Liu, A. (2015). Introduction of mobile health tools to support Ebola surveillance and contact tracing in Guinea. Global Health: Science and Practice, 3(4), 646-659. Tom-Aba, D., Nguku, P. M., Arinze, C. C., & Krause, G. (2018). Assessing the concepts and designs of 58 mobile apps for the management of the 2014-2015 West Africa Ebola outbreak: Systematic review. JMIR public health and surveillance, 4(4), e68. Perscheid, C., Benzler, J., Hermann, C., Janke, M., Moyer, D., Laedtke, T., ... & Krause, G. (2018). Ebola outbreak containment: real-time task and resource coordination with SORMAS. Frontiers in ICT, 5, 7 Singh, H. J. L., Couch, D., & Yap, K. (2020). Mobile health apps that help with COVID-19 management: scoping review. Jmir Nursing, 3(1), e20596 Mozur, P., Zhong, R., & Krolik, A. (2020). In coronavirus fight, China gives citizens a color code, with red flags. The New York Times, 1. Liang, Fan. (2020). COVID-19 and Health Code: How Digital Platforms Tackle the Pandemic in China. Social Media+ Society, 6(3), 2056305120947657. Ministry of Health of New Zealand(2021, September 10) NZ COVID Tracer QR codes, https://www.health.govt.nz/our-work/diseases-and-conditions/covid-19-novel-coronavirus/covid-19-resources-and-tools/nz-covid-tracer-app/nz-covid-tracer-qr-codes Kim, W., Jung, T. Y., Roth, S., Um, W., & Kim, C. (2021). Management of the COVID-19 Pandemic in the Republic of Korea from the Perspective of Governance and Public-Private Partnership. Yonsei medical journal, 62(9), 777-791. Ryan, M. (2020). In defence of digital contact-tracing: Human rights, South Korea and Covid-19. International Journal of Pervasive Computing and Communications. Chen, C. M., Jyan, H. W., Chien, S. C., Jen, H. H., Hsu, C. Y., Lee, P. C., ... & Chan, C. C. (2020). Containing COVID-19 among 627,386 persons in contact with the Diamond Princess cruise ship passengers who disembarked in Taiwan: big data analytics. Journal of medical Internet research, 22(5), e19540. Singh, H. J. L., Couch, D., & Yap, K. (2020). Mobile health apps that help with COVID-19 management: scoping review. JMIR nursing, 3(1), e20596. Goggin, G. (2020). COVID-19 apps in Singapore and Australia: reimagining healthy nations with digital technology. Media International Australia, 177(1), 61-75. Lee, T., & Lee, H. (2020). Tracing surveillance and auto-regulation in Singapore:‘smart’responses to COVID-19. Media International Australia, 177(1), 47-60. Lai, S. H. S., Tang, C. Q. Y., Kurup, A., & Thevendran, G. (2021). The experience of contact tracing in Singapore in the control of COVID-19: highlighting the use of digital technology. International orthopaedics, 45(1), 65-69. Michael, K., & Abbas, R. (2020). Behind COVID-19 contact trace apps: The Google–Apple partnership. IEEE Consumer Electronics Magazine, 9(5), 71-76. Fahey, R. A., & Hino, A. (2020). COVID-19, digital privacy, and the social limits on data-focused public health responses. International Journal of Information Management, 55, 102181. Abeler, J., Bäcker, M., Buermeyer, U., & Zillessen, H. (2020). COVID-19 contact tracing and data protection can go together. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 8(4), e19359. Ahmed, N., Michelin, R. A., Xue, W., Ruj, S., Malaney, R., Kanhere, S. S., ... & Jha, S. K. (2020). A survey of COVID-19 contact tracing apps. IEEE access, 8, 134577-134601. Riemer, K., Ciriello, R., Peter, S., & Schlagwein, D. (2020). Digital contact-tracing adoption in the COVID-19 pandemic: IT governance for collective action at the societal level. European Journal of Information Systems, 29(6), 731-745. Whitelaw, S., Mamas, M. A., Topol, E., & Van Spall, H. G. (2020). Applications of digital technology in COVID-19 pandemic planning and response. The Lancet Digital Health. Klar, R., & Lanzerath, D. (2020). The ethics of COVID-19 tracking apps–challenges and voluntariness. Research ethics, 16(3-4), 1-9. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly, 319-340. Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In Action control (pp. 11-39). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. Yuen, S., Cheng, E. W., Or, N. H., Grépin, K. A., Fu, K. W., Yung, K. C., & Yue, R. P. (2021). A tale of two city-states: A comparison of the state-led vs civil society-led responses to COVID-19 in Singapore and Hong Kong. Global public health, 1-21. Schraff, D. (2021). Political trust during the Covid‐19 pandemic: Rally around the flag or lockdown effects?. European journal of political research, 60(4), 1007-1017. Fancourt, D., Steptoe, A., & Wright, L. (2020). The Cummings effect: politics, trust, and behaviours during the COVID-19 pandemic. The Lancet, 396(10249), 464-465. Hartley, K., & Jarvis, D. S. (2020). Policymaking in a low-trust state: legitimacy, state capacity, and responses to COVID-19 in Hong Kong. Policy and Society, 39(3), 403-423. Greer, S. L., King, E. J., da Fonseca, E. M., & Peralta-Santos, A. (2020). The comparative politics of COVID-19: The need to understand government responses. Global public Kavanagh, M. M., & Singh, R. (2020). Democracy, capacity, and coercion in pandemic response: COVID-19 in comparative political perspective. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 45(6), 997-1012. Schmelz, K. (2021). Enforcement may crowd out voluntary support for COVID-19 policies, especially where trust in government is weak and in a liberal society. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(1), e2016385118. Velicia-Martin, F., Cabrera-Sanchez, J. P., Gil-Cordero, E., & Palos-Sanchez, P. R. (2021). Researching COVID-19 tracing app acceptance: incorporating theory from the technological acceptance model. PeerJ Computer Science, 7, e316. Redmiles, E. M. (2020). User Concerns 8 Tradeoffs in Technology-facilitated COVID-19 Response. Digital Government: Research and Practice, 2(1), 1-12. u2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1-22). Trang, S., Trenz, M., Weiger, W. H., Tarafdar, M., & Cheung, C. M. (2020). One app to trace them all? Examining app specifications for mass acceptance of contact-tracing apps. European Journal of Information Systems, 29(4), 415-428. Megnin-Viggars, O., Carter, P., Melendez-Torres, G. J., Weston, D., & Rubin, G. J. (2020). Facilitators and barriers to engagement with contact tracing during infectious disease outbreaks: A rapid review of the evidence. PloS one, 15(10), e0241473. Li, T., Cobb, C., Yang, J., Baviskar, S., Agarwal, Y., Li, B., ... & Hong, J. I. (2021). What makes people install a COVID-19 contact-tracing app? Understanding the influence of app design and individual difference on contact-tracing app adoption intention. Pervasive and Mobile Computing, 101439. Park, S., Choi, G. J., & Ko, H. (2021). Privacy in the Time of COVID-19: Divergent Paths for Contact Tracing and Route-Disclosure Mechanisms in South Korea. IEEE Security & Privacy, 19(3), 51-56. Villius Zetterholm, M., Lin, Y., & Jokela, P. (2021, September). Digital contact tracing applications during COVID-19: A scoping review about public acceptance. In Informatics (Vol. 8, No. 3, p. 48). Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute. Zhang, B., Kreps, S., McMurry, N., & McCain, R. M. (2020). Americans’ perceptions of privacy and surveillance in the COVID-19 pandemic. Plos one, 15(12), e0242652. Bargain, O., & Aminjonov, U. (2020). Trust and compliance to public health policies in times of COVID-19. Journal of Public Economics, 192, 104316. Gesser-Edelsburg, A., Cohen, R., Hijazi, R., & Shahbari, N. A. E. (2020). Analysis of public perception of the Israeli government’s early emergency instructions regarding COVID-19: online survey study. Journal of medical Internet research, 22(5), e19370. Gozgor, G. (2021). Global evidence on the determinants of public trust in governments during the COVID-19. Applied research in quality of life, 1-20. Devine, D., Gaskell, J., Jennings, W., & Stoker, G. (2021). Trust and the coronavirus pandemic: What are the consequences of and for trust? An early review of the literature. Political Studies Review, 19(2), 274-285. Greitens, S. C. (2020). Surveillance, security, and liberal democracy in the post-COVID world. International Organization, 74(S1), E169-E190. Nimrod, G. (2018). Technophobia among older Internet users. Educational Gerontology, 44(2-3), 148-162. Osiceanu, M. E. (2015). Psychological implications of modern technologies:“technofobia” versus “technophilia”. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 180, 1137-1144. Khasawneh, O. Y. (2018). Technophobia: Examining its hidden factors and defining it. Technology in Society, 54(1), 93-100 Troisi, O., Fenza, G., Grimaldi, M., & Loia, F. (2022). Covid-19 sentiments in smart cities: The role of technology anxiety before and during the pandemic. Computers in Human Behavior, 126, 106986. Perry, J. L. (1996). Measuring public service motivation: An assessment of construct reliability and validity. Journal of public administration research and theory, 6(1), 5-22. Kamal, S. A., Shafiq, M., & Kakria, P. (2020). Investigating acceptance of telemedicine services through an extended technology acceptance model (TAM). Technology in Society, 60, 101212. Chan, E. Y. (2021). Moral foundations underlying behavioral compliance during the COVID-19 pandemic. Personality and individual differences, 171, 110463. Marien, S., & Hooghe, M. (2011). Does political trust matter? An empirical investigation into the relation between political trust and support for law compliance. European Journal of Political Research, 50(2), 267-291. Krüger, N., Behne, A., Beinke, J. H., Stibe, A., & Teuteberg, F. (2022). Exploring User Acceptance Determinants of COVID-19-Tracing Apps to Manage the Pandemic. International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction (IJTHI), 18(1), 1-27. Dryhurst, S., Schneider, C. R., Kerr, J., Freeman, A. L., Recchia, G., Van Der Bles, A. M., ... & Van Der Linden, S. (2020). Risk perceptions of COVID-19 around the world. Journal of Risk Research, 23(7-8), 994-1006. von Wyl, V., Höglinger, M., Sieber, C., Kaufmann, M., Moser, A., Serra-Burriel, M., ... & Puhan, M. A. (2021). Drivers of acceptance of COVID-19 proximity tracing apps in Switzerland: panel survey analysis. JMIR public health and surveillance, 7(1), e25701. Kostka, G., & Habich-Sobiegalla, S. (2020). In times of crisis: public perceptions towards COVID-19 contact tracing apps in China, Germany and the US. Germany and the US (September 16, 2020). Lewandowsky, S., Dennis, S., Perfors, A., Kashima, Y., White, J. P., Garrett, P., ... & Yesilada, M. (2021). Public acceptance of privacy-encroaching policies to address the COVID-19 pandemic in the United Kingdom. Plos one, 16(1), e0245740. Pew Research Center (2020): Most Americans don’t think cellphone tracking will help limit COVID-19, are divided on whether it’s acceptable. April 16. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2020/04/16/mostamericans-dont-think-cellphone-tracking-will-help-limit-covid-19-are-divided-on-whether-its-acceptable/ Huang, Z., Guo, H., Lim, H. Y. F., & Chow, A. (2022). Determinants of the acceptance and adoption of a digital contact tracing tool during the COVID-19 pandemic in Singapore. Epidemiology & Infection, 150. Akinbi, A., Forshaw, M., & Blinkhorn, V. (2021). Contact tracing apps for the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic literature review of challenges and future directions for neo-liberal societies. Health Information Science and Systems, 9(1), 1-15 Garrett, P.; Wang, Y.; White, J.; Hsieh, S.; Strong, C.; Lee, Y.-C.; Lewandowsky, S.; Dennis, S.; Yang, C.-T. Young Adults View Smartphone Tracking Technologies for COVID-19 as Acceptable: The Case of Taiwan. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021 Garrett, P. M., Wang, Y. W., White, J. P., Kashima, Y., Dennis, S., & Yang, C. T. (2022). High Acceptance of COVID-19 Tracing Technologies in Taiwan: A Nationally Representative Survey Analysis. International journal of environmental research and public health, 19(6), 3323
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/85851-
dc.description.abstract在2020年新冠肺炎疫情當中,數位接觸追蹤作為輔助疫調的工具,在台灣防疫策略中扮演了重要的角色。本研究的目的旨在調查台灣民眾對數位接觸追蹤工具的態度,並於2022年5月17日至5月23日全國性的網路調查(N=450)。研究結果顯示,臺灣民眾對於各項Covid-19追蹤技術的接受度偏高,尤其是簡訊實聯制,其中女性比男性更願意接受各項數位接觸追蹤工具。另一方面,民眾的接受度與認知有效性、隱私考量、政治信任、社會性及法遵性之間具有關聯性。本研究的貢獻在於瞭解民眾對各種DCT工具的看法,以及影響接受度的因素,有助於未來政策制定者快速了解民眾對數位接觸追蹤工具的整體狀況,以促進良好、有效的公共溝通及政策說服。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractDuring the 2020 Covid-19 pandemic, digital contact tracing (DCT) has been deployed globally to reduce the spread of the virus. In Taiwan, comprehensive case investigation and contact tracing played a vital role in the pandemic prevention strategy, and the government has practiced many types of DCT tools to assist public health workers. This study conducted an online survey(N=450) between May 17th and May 23th, 2022, to investigate public support and acceptance of Covid-19 digital contact tracing tools among the Taiwanese population. The result shows support and acceptance for four kinds of Covid-19 tracing technologies adopted in Taiwan, especially for the 1922 SMS Contact Tracing system. Also, the analyses show that women are more willing to use Covid-19 tracking tools. Moreover, public attitudes toward contact-tracing technologies correlate with perceived effectiveness, trust in the government, privacy concerns, compliance, and prosocial. In sum, the findings provide empirical evidence for the government to improve the effectiveness of public communication regarding DCT technology during a future pandemic outbreak.en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2023-03-19T23:26:25Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
U0001-2209202216343600.pdf: 5947974 bytes, checksum: 678a5bcc88d428e5b0d20c92d3fb77f3 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2022
en
dc.description.tableofcontents第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究問題與目的 6 第二章 文獻回顧 7 第一節 接觸者追蹤的概念與發展 7 第二節 DCT的利益與挑戰 27 第三節 影響DCT接受度的因素 28 第三章 研究方法 35 第一節 研究架構與假設 35 第二節 研究方法與流程 39 第三節 問卷前測與正式發放 42 第四章 研究發現 45 第一節 個人基本資料 45 第二節 主要解釋變項 68 第三節 小結 77 第五章 結論與政策建議 81 第一節 討論 81 第二節 結論 83 參考資料 85 附錄:問卷題目 94
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.subject科技接受zh_TW
dc.subject新冠肺炎zh_TW
dc.subject民眾態度zh_TW
dc.subject監控zh_TW
dc.subject接觸追蹤zh_TW
dc.subjectpublic attitudesen
dc.subjectCovid-19en
dc.subjectcontact tracingen
dc.subjecttechnology acceptanceen
dc.subjectsurveillanceen
dc.title我國民眾對Covid-19數位接觸追蹤接受度之研究zh_TW
dc.titleAcceptance of the Digital Contact Tracing for Covid-19 in Taiwanen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear110-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee吳舜文(Shun-Wen Wu),李仲彬(Chung-Pin Lee)
dc.subject.keyword新冠肺炎,接觸追蹤,科技接受,監控,民眾態度,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordCovid-19,contact tracing,technology acceptance,surveillance,public attitudes,en
dc.relation.page96
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU202203834
dc.rights.note同意授權(全球公開)
dc.date.accepted2022-09-26
dc.contributor.author-college社會科學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept公共事務研究所zh_TW
dc.date.embargo-lift2022-09-30-
顯示於系所單位:公共事務研究所

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
U0001-2209202216343600.pdf5.81 MBAdobe PDF檢視/開啟
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved