請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/85734完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 趙曉芳(Shiau-Fang Chao) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Chin-Yi Su | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 蘇芩儀 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-03-19T23:22:47Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2022-07-05 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2022 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2022-06-04 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 內政部戶政司（ 2020 ）。各縣市老年人口比率。取自：https://www.ris.gov.tw/app/portal/346 立法院（2006）。老人福利法修正草案。取自：https://www.ly.gov.tw/Pages/Detail.aspx?nodeid=6588&pid=83593 王人卉、林儷蓉（2016）。在地老化意涵與面向之分析：以臺灣六都高齡福利措施為例。休閒與社會研究，13，p 159 – 168。 台灣版世界衛生組織生活品質問卷發展小組(2000)。台灣版世界衛生組織生活品質問卷之發展簡介。中華公共衛生雜誌，19(4)，315-324。 台北市社會局（2020a）。社區照顧關懷據點及里辦專案。取自：https://dosw.gov. taipei/News_Content.aspx?n=222C9779823FA161&s=0CE286F6AA2F930F 台北市社會局（2020b）。110 年度居家式、社區式長期照顧機構評鑑指標。取自： https://dosw.gov.taipei/News_Content.aspx?n=5EF22734BA80A829&sms=96505C2A85F034FD&s=1D39FA6010C02BEC 台北市社會局（2019）。108 年臺北市老人生活狀況調查報告。取自：https://dosw.gov.taipei/News_Content.aspx?n=27AAE5ED6FF97B25&s=4242254277CAF25A 呂寶靜（2012）。老人福利服務。五南：台北市。 余尚儒、林月娥、姚開屏、嚴元鴻、劉文信、林茂安、張育誠（2012）。臺灣嘉義縣鄉村地區接受日間照護服務老人之生活品質與相關因子研究。台灣老年醫學暨老年學雜誌，7(2)，105-119。 李瑞金（2011）。我國老人福利政策與立法發展。社區發展季刊，133，93-108。 林萬億（2012）。台灣的社會福利 歷史與制度的分析。台北市：五南。 林立中、蘇意晴、姚開屏（2020）。「臺灣簡明版世界衛生組織生活品質問卷」之信度概化研究。測驗學刊，67(3)，215-235。 邱韻寧（2003）。世界衛生組織生活品質問卷台灣簡明版在社區老人族群的適用性〔未出版之碩士論文〕。臺北醫學大學傷害防治學研究所。 邱皓政（2019）。量化研究與統計分析（六版）：SPSS 與R 資料分析範例解析。台北市：五南。 吳淑瓊、莊坤洋（2001）。在地老化：臺灣二十一世紀長期照護的政策方向。臺灣衛誌，20(3)，192-201。 吳明儒（2004）。「新故鄉社區總體營造政策」下的社區福利化。社區發展季刊，107，107-119。 徐菊容（2008）。出院居家安全指導提升老人跌倒預防之成效探討〔未出版之碩士論文〕。臺北醫學大學護理學系碩士暨碩士在職專班。 梁金麗（2001）。社區老年人生活品質相關因素之探討。〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立台北護理學院護理研究所。 姚開屏、錢承君、張育誠、林韋伶、王榮德、謝清麟、林茂榮（2017）。台灣版WHOQOL-OLD 問卷之發展與驗證。台灣公共衛生雜誌，36(3)，239-258。 姚開屏（2000）。台灣簡明版世界衛生組織生活品質問卷之發展及使用手冊（第一版）。台灣版世界衛生組織生活品質問卷發展小組。 施麗紅（2019）。是保護還是傷害？老人長期照顧機構住民約束的倫理抉擇探究。台灣社區工作與社區研究學刊，9(2)，53-112。 郭家伶（2014）。社區老年人健康指標與生活品質關係研究。成功大學老年學研究所學位論文。 郭登聰（2014）。建構「高齡友善城市」：從活躍老化到在地老化的重要課題－以社區照顧關懷據點為例。輔仁社會研究，4 期，p1-42。 陳玟如（2018）。尋找復元的可能-毒品使用者復元資本、復元障礙與復元關係之研究〔未出版之博士論文〕。國立臺灣大學社會工作學研究所。 陳曉梅、張宏哲（2007）。使用居家服務失能老人生活品質的現況及其影響因素之探討。長期照護雜誌, 11(3), 247-265。 傅麗蘭、楊政峰（1999）。獨居老人跌倒情形、步態、居家環境及身體功能評估。中華民國物理治療學會雜誌，24(2)，53-62。 黃珮玲（2016）。從社會發展觀點探討臺灣老人在社區安老的可能性。社區發展季刊，153，p290-304。 黃慧莉、林惠賢（2002）。老人知覺自主性量表中文修訂版之信效度評估。測驗年刊，49(2)，155-182。 黃耀榮（2012）。鄉村地區舊社區實現「在地老化」之住宅改造及參與式設計操作之可行性探討。都市與計劃，39，4，p431 – 459。 張席熒、謝妤葳、薛漪平、謝清麟（2006）。日常生活活動功能評量之四十年回顧。台灣復健醫學雜誌，34(2)，p 63-71。 趙善如、趙仁愛譯（2001）。老人社會工作權能激發取向。台北：揚智。 國發會（2020）「中華民國人口推估（2020 至2070 年）」，2020 年8 月。取自：https://pop-proj.ndc.gov.tw/download.aspx?uid=70&pid=70 國健署（衛福部國民健康署）（2016a）。高齡友善城市調查。取自https://www.mohw.gov.tw/cp-2625-19378-1.html 國健署（衛福部國民健康署）（2016b）。高齡友善—樂活台灣，衛生福利部季刊，10，12-15。 國建署（衛福部國民健康署）（2015）。中老年身心社會生活狀況長期追蹤調查成果報告，取自https://www.hpa.gov.tw/Pages/Detail.aspx?nodeid=242&pid=1282 國健署（2017）。台灣9 成以上縣市推動高齡友善城市 涵蓋比率國際之冠。取自https://www.mohw.gov.tw/cp-3159-24140-1.html 國健署（2019）。「WHO 高齡友善城市指南」摘要。取自：https://www.hpa.gov.tw/Pages/Detail.aspx?nodeid=3856&pid=11059 衛福部（2016）。長期照顧十年計畫 2.0（ 106~115 年） 核定本。取自：https://1966.gov.tw/LTC/cp-4001-42414-201.html 衛福部（2019）。「長照 2.0 執行情形、困境及未來規劃」專案報告。取自：https://www.mohw.gov.tw/dl-53891-a30c6a62-26ad-4e63-a98d-ee80247e1d4e.html 衛福部（2017a）。中華民國106 年老人狀況調查報告。取自https://dep.mohw.gov.tw/DOS/lp-1767-113.html 衛福部（2017b）。新型照顧管理評估量表。取自https://www.mohw.gov.tw/dl-15878-85fb3fa5-9172-431a-986e-35d16c6ff701.html 劉淑娟、葉玲玲、徐慧娟、周世珍、蕭伃玲、謝佳容、廖彥琦、謝嫣娉、毛慧芬、胡月娟、張晴翔（2019）。長期照護。華杏：台北市。 謝博瑜（2016）。世界衛生組織生活品質問卷應用於台灣老年人之心理計量研究〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立臺灣大學心理學研究所。 蘇麗瓊、黃雅玲（2005）。老人福利政策再出發－推動在地老化政策。社區發展季刊，110，5-13。 Ahn, M., Kwon, H. J., & Kang, J. (2017). Supporting Aging-in-Place Well: Findings. From a Cluster Analysis of the Reasons for Aging-in-Place and Perceptions of Well-Being. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 39(1), 3-15. Agahi, N., Ahacic, K., & Parker, M.G. (2006). Continuity of leisure participation from middle age to old age. The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences 61(6), 340-346. doi: 10.1093/geronb/61.6.s340 Aguinis, H., & Gottfredson, R. K. (2010). Best-practice recommendations for estimating interaction effects using moderated multiple regression. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(6), 776–786. doi:10.1002/job.686 Atchley, R.C. (1999). Continuity and Adaptation in Aging: Creating Positive Experiences. The Johns Hopkins University Press. Atchley, R.C. (1989). A Continuity Theory of Normal Aging. The Gerontological Society of America, 29(2), 183-190. Atchley, R.C. (1971). Retirement and leisure participation: continuity or crisis? The Gerontologist, 11,13-17. Atchley, R.C. (1982). The process of retirement: Comparing women and men. In M. Szinovacz (Ed.), Women's retirement. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Barresi, C.M., Ferraro, K.F. & Hobey, L.L.(1984). Environmental satisfaction,sociability, and well-being among urban elderly. Aging and human developemnet, 18(4), 277-293. Beck,U. (1998) Democracy Without Enemies. translated by Mark Ritter. Cambridge,UK : Polity Press. Byrnes, M., Lichtenberg, P.A., & Lysack, C. (2006). Environmental Press, Aging in Place, and Residential Satisfaction of Urban Older Adults. Journal of Applied Social Science,23,(2), 50-76. Bigonnesse, C. & Chaudhury, H. (2019). The Landscape of “Aging in Place” in Gerontology Literature: Emergence, Theoretical Perspectives, and Influencing Factors. Journal of Aging and Environment, 34(3), 233-251. doi: 10.1080/02763893.2019.1638875 Carter, S.E., Campbell, E.M., Sanson-Fisher, R.W., Redman, S., & Gillespie, W.J (1997). Environmental hazards in the homes of older people. Age Ageing,26(3), 195-202. doi: 10.1093/ageing/26.3.195 Cattell, V. & Evans, M. (1999) Neighborhood images in East London: Social capital and social networks on two East London estates . London: Joseph Rowntree Foundation. Choi, Y.J. (2020). Age-Friendly Features in Home and Community and the Self Reported Health and Functional Limitation of Older Adults: the Role of Supportive Environments. Journal of Urban Health, 97(4), 471-485. doi: 10.1007/s11524-020-00462-6. Cook, C.C., Martin, P., Yearns, M., & Damhorst, M.L. (2007). Attachment to “Place” and Coping with Losses in Changed Communities: A Paradox for Aging Adults. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal,35(3), 201-214. doi: 10.1177/1077727X06296794 Clark, R.F. (1991). HOME AND COMMUNITY-BASED CARE IN THE USA. https://aspe.hhs.gov/basic-report/home-and-community-based-care-usa Clarke, P., Ailshire J.A., Lantz P. (2009) Urban built environments and trajectories of mobility disability: findings from a national sample of community-dwelling American adults. Soc Sci Med, 69(6), 964-70. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009 Clarke, P. & Gallagher, N.A.(2013) Optimizing mobility in later life: the role of the urban built environment for older adults aging in place. J Urban Health, 90(6), 997-1009. doi: 10.1007/s11524-013-9800-4 Cramm, J.M. & Nieboer, A.P. (2015). Social cohesion and belonging predict the wellbeing of community-dwelling older people. BMC Geriatrics, 15(30). doi :10.1186/s12877-015-0027-y Davies S, Ellis L, Laker S. (2000). Promoting autonomy and independence for older people within nursing practice: an observational study. Journal of Clinical Nursing,9(1),127-136. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2702.2000.00348.x. Duppen, D., Van der Elst, MCJ., Dury, S., Lambotte, D., De Donder, L., D-SCOPE.(2017). The Social Environment's Relationship With Frailty: Evidence From Existing Studies. Journal of Applied Gerontology,1-24. Evci, E.D., Ergin, F. & Beşer, E. (2006). Home accidents in the elderly in Turkey. The Tohoku Journal of Experimental Medicine, 209(4), 291-301.doi:10.1620/tjem.209.291 Iecovich, E. (2014). Aging in place: From theory to practice. Anthropological notebooks , 20(1), 21-33. Fernández-Carro, C. (2013). Aging in place in Europe: A multidimensional approach to independent living in later life. (Doctoral dissertation, Centre for Demographic Studies, Autonomous University of Barcelona). Retrieved from https://www.tdx.cat/bitstream/handle/10803/129081/cfc1de1.pdf?sequence=1 Field ,D.(1999) Continuity and change in friendships in advanced old age: findings from the Berkeley older generation study. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 48(4):325-46. doi: 10.2190/J4UJ-JAU6-14TF-2MVF. Finchum, T., Weber, J.A. (2000). Applying Continuity Theory to Older Adult Friendships. Journal of Aging and Identity 5, 159–168. doi: 10.1023/ A: 100 9513304519 Flores, R., Caballer, A., & Alarcón, A. (2019). Evaluation of an Age-Friendly City and Its Effect on Life Satisfaction: A Two-Stage Study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(24), 5073. doi:10.3390/ijerph16245073 Gustafson, P. (2001). Meanings of place: Everyday experiences and theoretical conceptualizations. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21, 5-16. Golant, S.M. (2008). Commentary: Irrational Exuberance for the Aging in Place of Vulnerable Low-Income Older Homeowners, Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 20:4, 379-397, DOI: 10.1080/08959420802131437 Hayes, A.F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: a regression-based approach. New York: The Guilford Press Heumann,L., & Boldy, D. (1993). Aging in Place with Dignity: International Solutions Relating to the Low-income and Frail Elderly. Connecticut: Praeger. Health Foundation. (2020a, September 17). National Health Service and Community Care Act 1990 [Web blog message]. Retrieved from https://navigator.health.org.uk/theme/national-health-service-and-communitycare-act-1990 Health Foundation. (2020b, September 17). 'Caring for people: community care in the next decade and beyond' white paper [Web blog message]. Retrieved from https://navigator.health.org.uk/theme/caring-people-community-care-nextdecade-and-beyond-white-paper Heinz, M., Cone, N., Da Rosa, G., Bishop, A.J.,& Finchum, T. (2017). Examining Evidence for Psychosocial Theories of Aging within the Oral History Narratives of Centenarians. Societies, 7(8), 1-21. doi:10.3390/soc7020008 Hertz, J.E.(1996). Conceptualization of perceived enactment of autonomy in the elderly. Issues Ment Health Nurs, 17(3), 261-73. doi: 10.3109/01612849609049919. Hertz, J. E., & Anschutz, C. A. (2002). Relationships among Perceived Enactment of Autonomy, Self-Care, and Holistic Health in Community-Dwelling Older Adults. Journal of Holistic Nursing, 20(2), 166–186. Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., Mullen, M.(2008). Structural Equation Modelling: Guidelines for Determining Model Fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53-60. Huang, H, C. (2004). A checklist for assessing the risk of falls among the elderly. The Journal of Nursing Research, 12(2), 131-42. doi: 10.1097/01.jnr.0000387496.39675.7f. Hillcoat-Nallétamby, S. & Ogg, J. (2014). Moving beyond 'ageing in place': Older people's dislikes about their home and neighbourhood environments as a motive for wishing to move. Ageing and Society,34, 1771-1796. doi: 10.1017/S0144686X13000482. Isaacson, M., Tripathi, A., Samanta, T., D'Ambrosio, L., & Coughlin, J. (2020). Giving Voice to the Environment as the Silent Partner in Aging: Examining the Moderating Roles of Gender and Family Structure in Older Adult Wellbeing.International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(12). doi: 10.3390/ijerph17124373 Kwok (2018). Participatory action research: public space design by older people. In KH Chong & M Cho (Eds.), Creative ageing cities: place design with older people in Asian cities, p121-144. Oxon: Routledge. Levasseur, M., Dubois, MF., Généreux, M. et al (2017). Capturing how age-friendly communities foster positive health, social participation and health equity: a study protocol of key components and processes that promote population health in aging Canadians. BMC Public Health ,17, 502. doi:/10.1186/s12889-017-4392-7 Lichtenberg, P.A., MacNeill, S.E. & Mast, B.T. (2000). Environmental Press and Adaptation to Disability in Hospitalized Live-Alone Older Adults. The Gerontologist,40(5),549–556. doi: 10.1093/geront/40.5.549 Lin, L.J. & Yen, H.Y. (2018). Benefits of Leisure Participation on Relocation Adjustment for Senior Residents. The journal of nursing research. Lawton, M.P. & Simon, B. (1968). The Ecology of Social Relationships in Housing for the Elderly. The Gerontologist, 8(2),108-115. doi.org/10.1093/geront/8.2.108 Lawton, M. P., Nahemow, L. (1973). Ecology and the aging process. In C. Eisdorfer 8k M. P. Lawton (Eds.), Psychology of adult development and aging (pp. 619-674). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. Lawton, M.P. (1974). Social ecology and the health of older people. The American Journal of Public Health, 64(3):257-260. doi:10.2105/ajph.64.3.257 Lawton, M. P. (1989). Environmental proactivity and affect in older people. In S. Spacapan & S. Oskamp (Eds.), Claremont symposium on applied social psychology. The social psychology of aging (p. 135–163). Sage Publications, Inc. Lawton, M. P. (1991). A multidimensional view of quality of life in frail elders. In J. E. Birren, J. E. Lubben, J. C. Rowe, & D. E. Deutchman (Eds.), The concept and measurement of quality of life in the frail elderly (p. 3–27). Academic Press.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-101275-5.50005-3 Loo, B.P.Y., Lam, W.W.Y., Mahendran, R., & Katagiri, K. (2017). How Is the Neighborhood Environment Related to the Health of Seniors Living in Hong Kong, Singapore, and Tokyo? Some Insights for Promoting Aging in Place. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 107(4), 812-828.doi: 10.1080/24694452.2016.1271306 Morgan, T.J., Hansson, R.O., Indart, M.J., Austin, D.M., Crutcher, M.M., Hampton, P.W., Oppegard, K.M, & O'daffer, V.E. (1984). Old Age and Environmental Docility: The Roles of Health, Support and Personality. Journal of Gerontology, 39(2),240-242. doi :10.1093/geronj/39.2.240 Mortazavi, H., Tabatabaeichehr, M., Taherpour, M., & Masoumi, M. (2018). Relationship Between Home Safety and Prevalence of Falls and Fear of Falling Among Elderly People: a Cross-sectional Study. Materia ocio-Medica, 30(2), 103-107. doi: 10.5455/msm.2018.30.103-107. National Conference of State Legislatures & AARP Public Policy Institute. (2010). Aging in Place: A State Survey of Livability Policies and Practices. https://assets.aarp.org/rgcenter/ppi/liv-com/aging-in-place-2011-full.pdf Oswald, F., Jopp, D., Rott, C., & Wahl, H.W. (2011). Is Aging in Place a Resource for or Risk to Life Satisfaction? The Gerontologist, 51(2),238–250. doi:10.1093/geront/gnq096 OECD. (2015). Ageing in Cities. Paris, France: OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/regional/ageing-in-cities-9789264231160-en.htm Östman, M., Ung,E.J. & Falk, K. (2015) Continuity means“preserving a consistent whole”—A grounded theory study, International Journal of Qualitative Studies. Health and Well-being, 10(1). doi: 10.3402/qhw.v10.29872 Park, S. & Lee, S. (2017). Age-friendly environments and life satisfaction among South Korean elders: person-environment fit perspective. Aging Mental Health, 21(7),693-702. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2016.1154011 Parmelee, P. A., & Lawton, M. P. (1990). The design of special environments for the aged. In J. E. Birren & K. W. Schaie (Eds.), The handbooks of aging. Handbook of the psychology of aging (p. 464–488). Academic Press. Phillipson, C. (2006).’Aging and Globalization: Issues for Critical Gerontology and Political Economy.’ in J. Baars, D. Dannefer, C. Phillipson, A.Walker (eds) Aging, Globalization and Inequality, New York: Baywood Publishing Company, pp 43-58. Phillipson, C. (2010). Ageing and urban society: Growing old in the Century of the City.In D. Dannefer & C. Phillipson(Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Social Gerontology (pp. 597-606). London, England: SAGE. Phillipson, C., Benard, M., Phillips, J., & Ogg, J. (2001) The family and community life of older people : social networks and social support in three urban areas. London: Routledge. UK, York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation. Phillipson, C. (2007). The 'elected' and the 'excluded': Sociological perspectives on the experience of place and community in old age. Ageing & Society, 27(3), 321–342. doi:10.1017/S0144686X06005629 Pretty, Grace & Chipuer, Heather & Bramston, Paul. (2003). Sense of place amongst adolescents and adults in two rural Australian towns: The discriminating features of place attachment, sense of community and place dependence in relation to place identity. Journal of Environmental Psychology.23. doi:10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00079-8. Riley, G.A., Fisher, G., Hagger, B.F., Elliott, A., Le Serve, H., Oyebode, J.R. (2013).The Birmingham Relationship Continuity Measure: the development and evaluation of a measure of the perceived continuity of spousal relationships in dementia. Journal of the International Psychogeriatric, 25(2),263-274. doi: 10.1017/S1041610212001743. Riley, G.A., Evans, L. & Oyebode, J.R.(2018). Relationship continuity and emotional well-being in spouses of people with dementia. Aging Mental Health, 22(3),299-305. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2016.1248896. Rowles, G.D., and M. Bernard. (2013). Environmental gerontology: Making meaningful places in old age. New York: Springer Publishing Company. Rowles, G. D., Oswald, F., & Hunter, E. G. (2004). Interior living environments in old age. In H.-W. Wahl, R. Scheidt, & P. G. Windley (Eds.), Aging in context: Sociophysical environments. Rodríguez-Rodríguez V., & Sánchez-González D. (2016). Approaches to Environmental Gerontology in the Mediterranean Europe and Latin America: Policy and Practice on Ageing and Place. In: Sánchez-González D., Rodríguez- Rodríguez V. (eds) Environmental Gerontology in Europe and Latin America. Springer: Cham. Rojo-Pérez, F., Fernandez-Mayoralas, G., Rivera, E., & Abuin, J. (2001). Ageing in Place: Predictors of the Residential Satisfaction of Elderly. Social Indicators Research. 54. 173-208. 10.1023/A:1010852607362. Rowles, G.D. (1993). Evolving Images of Place in Aging and Aging in Place. Journal of the American Society on Aging, 17(2), 65-70. Rowles, G.D. (2006). Commentary: A House Is Not a Home: But Can It Become One? In Wahl, H.W., Brenner, H., Mollenkopf, H., Rothenbacher, D., Rott, C. (Eds.),The Many Faces of Health, Competence and Well-Being in Old Age Integrating Epidemiological, Psychological and Social Perspectives (pp. 25-32). Springer: Netherlands. Rowles, G.D., & Bernard, M. (2013). Environmental Gerontology: Making Meaningful Places in Old Age. New York: Springer Publishing. Rubin, A & Babie, E.R. (2017)。社會工作研究方法（李政賢譯）。五南。（原著出版於2014 年） Scharlach & Moore. (2016). Aging in place. P407-426. in Handbook of Theories of Aging. Sixsmith, A., & Sixsmith, J. (2008). Ageing in Place in the United Kingdom. AgeingInternational, 32, 219–235. Smith, A.E. (2009). Ageing in Urban Neighbourhoods: Place Attachment and Social Exclusion. England: Policy Press. Tideiksaar, R. (1986). Preventing falls: home hazard checklists to help older patients protect themselves. Geriatrics, 41(5):26-8. PMID: 3957043. UN. (2002). Second World Assembly on Ageing adopted the Madrid International Plan of Action. Derived from: https://www.un.org/press/en/2002/soc4619.doc.htm United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (2017). World Population Ageing.Https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/pdf/ageing/WPA2017_Highlights.pdf Vasunilashorn, S., Steinman, B.A., Liebig, P.S., & Pynoos, J. (2011). Aging in Place: Evolution of a Research Topic Whose Time Has Come. Journal of Aging Research. doi:10.1155/2012/120952\ Wahl, H.W., Mollenkopf, H., Oswald, F., & Claus, C. (2007). Environmental Aspects of Quality of Life in Old Age: Conceptual and Empirical Issues. In: Mollenkopf H., Walker A. (eds) Quality of Life in Old Age. Social Indicators Research Series, vol 31. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5682-6_7 Wahl, H.W. & Gitlin, L.N. (2007). Environmental gerontology. In: Birren JE, editor. Encyclopedia of gerontology. Age, aging, and the aged. Oxford: Elsevier. p. 494- 501. Wahl, H.W., & Oswald, F. (2010). Environmental perspectives on aging. In D. Dannefer & C. Phillipson (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Social Gerontology (pp.111-123). SAGE. doi:10.4135/9781446200933.n8. Wahl, H.W. & Weisman, G. (2003). Environmental Gerontology at the Beginning of the New Millennium: Reflections on Its Historical, Empirical, and Theoretical Development. The Gerontologist, 43, 616-627. Wahl, H.W., Iwarsson, S. & Oswald,F. (2012). Aging well and the Environment: Toward an Integrative Model and Research Agenda for the Future.The gerontologist, 52(3), 306-316. Wiles, J.L., Leibing, A., Guberman, N., Reeve, J., & Allen, R.E.S. (2011). The Meaning of “Aging in Place” to Older People. The Gerontologist, 52 (3), 357–366.doi:10.1093/geront/gnr098 Weil, J. (2014). The New Neighborhood Senior Center: Redefining Social and Service Roles for the Baby Boom Generation. Rutgers University Press. WHO World Health Organization. (1996). Introduction, administration, scoring a nd generic version of the assessment. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/ mental_health/media/en/76.pdf WHO World Health Organization (2006). WHOQOL-OLD Manual. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/mental_health/evidence/WHOQOL_OLD_Manual.pdf? ua=1 WHO World Health Organization (2007). Global Age-friendly Cities: A Guide. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/ageing/publications/Global_age_friendly_cities_Guide_English.pdf WHO World Health Organization. (2015). World report on ageing and health.Retrieved from http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/186463/1/97892406948 11_eng.pdf?ua=1 World Health Organization (2007). Checklist of Essential Features of Age-friendly Cities. Available online: http://www.who.int/ageing/age_friendly_cities_mat erial/en/ Yen, I.H., Shim, J. K., Martinez, A.D., & Barker, J.C. (2012). Older People and Social Connectedness: How Place and Activities Keep People Engaged. Journal of Aging Research. doi:10.1155/2012/139523 Yu, R., Wong, M., & Woo, J. (2018). Perceptions of Neighborhood Environment, Sense of Community, and Self-Rated Health: an Age-Friendly City Project in Hong Kong. Journal of Urban Health, 96(2), 276-288. doi: 10.1007/s11524-018-00331-3 前田展弘（2018）。超高齢社会のまちづくり「柏プロジェクト」。経済のプリズ，168，1-54。 厚生勞動省（2017）。老人保健健康増進等事業 地域包括ケア研究会報告書 2040 年に向けた挑戦。取自：https://www.murc.jp/sp/1509/houkatsu/houkatsu_01.html 厚生勞動省（ 2018 ）。「地域共生社会」の実現に向けて。取自： https://www.mhlw.go.jp/stf/newpage_00506.html 厚生勞動省（2013），都市部の高齢化対策に関する検討会報告書。取自： https://www.mhlw.go.jp/stf/shingi/0000024314.html?fbclid=IwAR0TyST642Tri H98I6rLUnrjMRSD46aKJgKcFcqUHwWnK2gvUKxCvslnL7Q 飯島勝矢（2015）。在宅医療の立場から─安心して暮らせるコミュニティづくり─。学術の動向，特集2，60-64。 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/85734 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 在地老化是1980 年代以來各國普世的老人照護目標，被視為提升老年生活品質的關鍵。然而，目前缺少探討在地老化整體實踐如何影響老人生活品質的研究；是否有其他因素存在於在地老化實踐的影響過程中，也缺乏討論。據文獻探討，老人於日常生活中保有行為慣習的連續性，亦可能為影響生活品質之因素。因此本研究立基於環境老年學的環境壓力理論，據在地老化的定義嘗試以居家安全性、生活自主性、社區環境高齡友善性三項指標作為在地老化實踐的測量。同時融合連續理論中的外在連續性，探索上述變項對都市長者生活品質的影響效果。 透過台北市253 位60 歲以上長者的有效回覆，藉統計軟體SPSS 與AMOS進行多元迴歸及中介效果路徑分析。整體來說研究發現居家安全、生活自主、社區環境友善性皆能提升生活品質，當中又以後兩項實踐的影響更為重要。其次，長者的人際穩定性與活動連續性亦能提升其生活品質，且其不僅有直接效果，亦在生活自主與社區環境友善對生活品質的影響具有部份中介效果。 在地老化因失能照護與去機構化理念而起，使政策較關注生理照顧層面的服務。然而，若欲展現在地老化積極意涵，本研究則認為勿僅止滿足於長者在地居住而非送往機構的事實，應關注其居家安全、生活自主、社區高齡友善環境的落實。重要的是，都市長者的外在連續性應被看見，協助其與熟悉人事物和社區環境保有長期且持續的連結，避免長者「雖住在家裡或來回於各種社區式服務之間，卻與在地生活毫無與自身生命經驗連續的關係」。於實務工作中，建議工作者評估社區長者生活品質時，將上述三項在地老化實踐項目納入考量，並於服務方案融入在地或長輩熟悉的相關元素，使其能立基過往的人際關係或活動上適應生活中的新改變。同時，倡議型組織可積極關注長者於都市社區空間上之使用權利／力關係，以落實真正有生活品質的在地老化。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | “Aging in place” has long been a popular and desirable term to improve quality of life (QOL) among older adults. Yet most existing studies only focus on certain aspects instead of viewing aging in place inclusively from its three elemental definitions: being safe at home, maintaining autonomy, and enjoying aging-friendly community. Furthermore, less is known about how continuity of daily lives potentially affects older adults’ QOL. Integrating the Environmental Press Theory and the Continuity Theory, this study evaluates how aging in place elements and external continuity of city dwelling older adults combine to their quality of lives. 253 adults aged 60 and above were recruited. The sample was not representative of community-dwelling older adults in Taipei city. A structed questionnaire was done by either paper-and-pencil or an online survey. Results found that, firstly, home safety, autonomy and aging-friendly community all positively affect QOL, with the two latter elements having stronger effect. Secondly, stability of personal relationship and activity continuity not only show strong effect towards QOL but also play as mediators between autonomy, aging-friendly community and QOL. This study urges that to put aging in place into a more active practice, policy makers and social workers should not only evaluate the situation of home safety, autonomy and aging-friendly community of older adults, but also pay attention to their external continuity which is to keep the long-term relationship with local community and preserve their own daily routines. To meet higher QOL among older adults, related organizations could be more proactive to empower older people to become agents of their own communities and city spaces. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2023-03-19T23:22:47Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 U0001-1307202116042200.pdf: 2763828 bytes, checksum: f67f6ae3a1b03b30e24c8e3c64d2b64d (MD5) Previous issue date: 2022 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 謝誌 1 摘要 3 Abstract 4 圖目錄 7 表目錄 8 第一章 緒論 9 第一節、研究背景與動機 9 第二節、研究目的 13 第二章、文獻探討 14 第一節、老化生態環境觀點下的生活品質 14 第二節、在地老化的演變與實踐內涵 21 第三節、都市的外在連續性與老年生活品質 30 第三章 研究方法 40 第一節、研究設計 40 第二節、研究假設 42 第三節、變項的定義與測量工具 43 第四節、研究對象、抽樣方法與資料蒐集 51 第五節、資料分析方法 54 第六節、信效度分析 56 第七節、研究倫理 61 第四章 研究結果分析 63 第一節、資料描述 63 第二節、雙變項分析 73 第三節、在地老化實踐對生活品質之多元迴歸分析 80 第四節、外在連續性作為調節變項之交互作用分析 82 第五節、外在連續性作為中介變項之路徑分析 86 第五章 結論與建議 93 第一節、研究發現與討論 93 第二節、研究限制 101 第三節、研究建議 103 參考文獻 109 附件（二） 正式施測問卷 125 圖目錄 圖 3-1-1 研究架構圖1 41 圖 3-1-2 研究架構圖2 41 圖4-5-1 在地老化與外在連續性對整體生活品質之路徑分析 87 表目錄 表3-3-1 人際關係連續性自建題組 48 表3-3-2 活動連續性自建題組 48 表3-4-1 研究資料蒐集與回收 53 表3-7-1 台灣簡明版世界衛生組織生活品質問卷各題因素負荷量 57 表3-7-2 居家安全性各題因素負荷量 58 表3-7-3 生活自主性各題因素負荷量 58 表3-7-4 社區環境高齡友善性各題因素負荷量 59 表3-7-5 人際關係連續性兩構面各題因素負荷量 60 表3-7-6 活動連續性各題因素負荷量 60 表4-2-1 性別之獨立樣本T 檢定 73 表4-2-2 獨居與否之獨立樣本T 檢定 74 表4-2-3 教育程度與生活品質單因子變異數分析 74 表4-2-4 與配偶合計月收入與生活品質單因子變異數分析 75 表4-2-5 婚姻狀況與生活品質單因子變異數分析 76 表4-2-6 問卷來源之獨立樣本T 檢定 76 表4-2-7 自變項與整體生活品質之皮爾森相關係數 79 表4-3-1 在地老化實踐對生活品質之多元迴歸表 81 表4-5-1 在地老化實踐與外在連續性對生活品質之總、間接、直接效果 90 表4-5-2 研究結果摘要表 92 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 在地老化 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 環境老年學 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 連續理論 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 老人生活品質 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Aging in place | en |
| dc.subject | Environmental gerontology | en |
| dc.subject | Quality of life | en |
| dc.subject | Continuity Theory | en |
| dc.title | 在地老化實踐、外在連續性與都市老人生活品質研究-以台北市為例 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Aging in Place Practice, External Continuity and Quality of Life among older adults in cities: An Analysis of Taipei City | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 110-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 陳正芬(Chen-Fen Chen),張宏哲(Hong-Jer Chang) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 在地老化,環境老年學,連續理論,老人生活品質, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Aging in place,Environmental gerontology,Continuity Theory,Quality of life, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 136 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202101437 | |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2022-06-06 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 社會工作學研究所 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2022-07-05 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 社會工作學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| U0001-1307202116042200.pdf | 2.7 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。