請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/85654完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 李書行(Shiu-Hsing Li) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ching-Ting Yang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 楊靜婷 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-03-19T23:20:41Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2022-07-29 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2022 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2022-06-24 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 1. 毛治文 & 吳文傑(2016)，以差異中差異配對分析法檢驗雙元所得稅制度對經濟成長的影響，經濟研究，52，169-205。 2. 余明桂 & 潘紅波 (2008)，政治關係，制度環境與民營企業銀行貸款，管理世界，8，9-21。 3. 吳文鋒，吳衝鋒 & 劉曉薇(2008)，中國民營上市公司高管的政府背景與公司價值，經濟研究，7，130-141。 4. 吳佳真，2004，公營事業民營化財務資訊能否反映公司價值，成功大學會計學研究所碩士論文。 5. 張敏 & 黃繼承 (2009)，政治關聯，多元化與企業風險—來自我國證券市場的經驗證據，管理世界，7，156-164。 6. 莊惟凱，鄭致道，蔡玉真，林麗真，林依萍 & 鄭鴻鈞(2016)，應用全國資料庫及傾向分數配對探討台灣地區全乳切除術後輔助放射治療在 N1 病人的角色，放射治療與腫瘤學，23，249-257。 7. 廖錦文，鄭博文，江耀宗，俞錚蓉 & 石宜正(2016)，比較偏遠與一般地區學生數學表現之差異：傾向分數配對法的分析，Chinese Journal of Science Education，24，549-572。 8. 關秉寅 & 李敦義(2008)，補習數學有用嗎? 一個 [反事實] 的分析，臺灣社會學刊，41，97-148。 9. Adhikari, A., Derashid, C., & Zhang, H. (2006). Public policy, political connections, and effective tax rates: Longitudinal evidence from Malaysia. Journal of Accounting and Public policy, 25, 574-595. 10. Agrawal, A., & Knoeber, R. (2001). Do some outside directors play a political role?. The Journal of Law and Economics, 44, 179-198. 11. Ang, S., & Ding, K. (2006). Government ownership and the performance of government-linked companies: The case of Singapore. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 16, 64-88. 12. Austin, P. C. (2008). Assessing balance in measured baseline covariates when using many‐to‐one matching on the propensity‐score. Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety, 17(12), 1218-1225. 13. Banerji, S., Duygun, M., & Shaban, M. (2018). Political connections, bailout in financial markets and firm value. Journal of Corporate Finance, 50, 388-401. 14. Ben‐Nasr, I. Boubakri, N., & Cosset, J. C. (2012). The political determinants of the cost of equity: Evidence from newly privatized firms. Journal of Accounting Research, 50(3), 605-646. 15. Bennedsen, M. (2000). Political ownership. Journal of Public Economics, 76, 559-581. 16. Beuselinck, C., Cao, L., Deloof, M., & Xia, X. (2017). The value of government ownership during the global financial crisis. Journal of corporate Finance, 42, 481-493. 17. Blanchard, O., & Shleifer, A. (2001). Federalism with and without political centralization: China versus Russia. IMF staff papers, 48, 171-179. 18. Bliss, A., & Gul, A. (2012). Political connection and cost of debt: Some Malaysian evidence. Journal of Banking & Finance, 36, 1520-1527. 19. Boateng, A., Du, M., Bi, X., Kwabi, F. O., & Glaister, K. W. (2021). Ownership Type, Home‐Country Government‐Directed Investment Policies and Firm Value in Strategic Sectors: Evidence from Chinese Acquiring Firms. British Journal of Management. 20. Bonin, P., Hasan, I., & Wachtel, P. (2005). Bank performance, efficiency and ownership in transition countries. Journal of banking & finance, 29, 31-53. 21. Borisova, G., & Megginson, L. (2011). Does government ownership affect the cost of debt? Evidence from privatization. The Review of Financial Studies, 24, 2693-2737. 22. Borisova, G., Brockman, P., Salas, M., & Zagorchev, A. (2012). Government ownership and corporate governance: Evidence from the EU. Journal of Banking & Finance, 36, 2917-2934. 23. Borisova, G., Fotak, V., Holland, K., & Megginson, L. (2015). Government ownership and the cost of debt: Evidence from government investments in publicly traded firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 118, 168-191. 24. Borisova, G., Fotak, V., Holland, K., & Megginson, W. L. (2015). Government ownership and the cost of debt: Evidence from government investments in publicly traded firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 118, 168-191. 25. Boubakri, N., Cosset, C., & Saffar, W. (2008). Political connections of newly privatized firms. Journal of corporate finance, 14, 654-673. 26. Boubakri, N., El Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O., & Megginson, W. L. (2018). The market value of government ownership. Journal of corporate Finance, 50, 44-65. 27. Boubakri, N., Guedhami, O., Mishra, D., & Saffar, W. (2012). Political connections and the cost of equity capital. Journal of corporate finance, 18, 541-559. 28. Bunkanwanicha, P., & Wiwattanakantang, Y. (2009). Big business owners in politics. The Review of Financial Studies, 22, 2133-2168. 29. Chaney, K., Faccio, M., & Parsley, D. (2011). The quality of accounting information in politically connected firms. Journal of accounting and Economics, 51, 58-76. 30. Charumilind, C., Kali, R., & Wiwattanakantang, Y. (2006). Connected lending: Thailand before the financial crisis. The Journal of Business, 79(1), 181-218. 31. Chemmanur, J., Loutskina, E., & Tian, X. (2014). Corporate venture capital, value creation, and innovation. The Review of Financial Studies, 27, 2434-2473. 32. Chen, Z., Dyreng, S., & Li, B. (2018). Corporate political contributions and tax avoidance. In 2014 American Taxation Association Midyear Meeting. 33. Chu, W., & Hung, Y. (2002). Business groups in Taiwan’s post-liberalization economy. Taiwan: A Radical Quarterly in Social Studies, 47, 33-83. 34. Cornett, M. M., Guo, L., Khaksari, S., & Tehranian, H. (2010). The impact of state ownership on performance differences in privately-owned versus state-owned banks: An international comparison. Journal of financial intermediation, 19, 74-94. 35. Cornett, M., Guo, L., Khaksari, S., & Tehranian, H. (2010). The impact of state ownership on performance differences in privately-owned versus state-owned banks: An international comparison. Journal of financial intermediation, 19, 74-94. 36. Cull, R., & Xu, L. C. (2003). Who gets credit? The behavior of bureaucrats and state banks in allocating credit to Chinese state-owned enterprises. Journal of Development Economics, 71, 533-559. 37. Demirguc, A., & Detragiache, E. (2002). Does deposit insurance increase banking system stability? An empirical investigation. Journal of monetary economics, 49, 1373-1406. 38. Deng, Z., Yan, J., & Van Essen, M. (2018). Heterogeneity of political connections and outward foreign direct investment. International Business Review, 27, 893-903. 39. Djamaluddin, S., Putridan, M. J., & Ali, H. (2017). Financial distress comparative analysis of japanese electronic manufacturer after financial global crisis 2008 using altman, ohlson, and zmijewski model. The International Journal of Business and Management, 5, 131-141. 40. Domberger, S., & Piggott, J. (1986). Privatization policies and public enterprise: A survey. Economic record, 62, 145-162. 41. Faccio, M., Masulis, W., & McConnell, J. (2006). Political connections and corporate bailouts. Journal of Finance, 61, 2597-2635. 42. Fan, J. P., Wong, T. J., & Zhang, T. (2007). Politically connected CEOs, corporate governance, and Post-IPO performance of China's newly partially privatized firms. Journal of financial economics, 84, 330-357. 43. Feng, L., Fu, T., & Kutan, A. M. (2019). Can government intervention be both a curse and a blessing? Evidence from China's finance sector. International Review of Financial Analysis, 61, 71-81. 44. Ferguson, T., & Voth, H. J. (2008). Betting on Hitler—the value of political connections in Nazi Germany. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123, 101-137. 45. Fisman, R. (2001). Estimating the value of political connections. American economic review, 91, 1095-1102. 46. Fung, Y., Gul, A., & Radhakrishnan, S. (2015). Corporate political connections and the 2008 Malaysian election. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 43, 67-86. 47. Goldman, E., Rocholl, J., & So, J. (2009). Do politically connected boards affect firm value?. The review of financial studies, 22, 2331-2360. 48. Heckman, J., & Navarro-Lozano, S. (2004). Using matching, instrumental variables, and control functions to estimate economic choice models. Review of Economics and statistics, 86(1), 30-57. 49. Huang, C., & Chan, C. (2021). Decoding insider silence: evidence from China securities market. Journal of Asset Management, 22, 581-599. 50. Huyghebaert, N., & Wang, L. (2012). Expropriation of minority investors in Chinese listed firms: The role of internal and external corporate governance mechanisms. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 20(3), 308-332. 51. Iannotta, G., Nocera, G., & Sironi, A. (2013). The impact of government ownership on bank risk. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 22, 152-176. 52. Johnson, S., & Mitton, T. (2003). Cronyism and capital controls: evidence from Malaysia. Journal of financial economics, 67, 351-382. 53. Keefe, C. (2019). A theory of political connections and financial outcomes. International Review of Economics & Finance, 61, 108-127. 54. Khwaja, I., & Mian, A. (2005). Do lenders favor politically connected firms? Rent provision in an emerging financial market. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120(4), 1371-1411. 55. Kiel, K. A., & McClain, K. T. (1995). House prices during siting decision stages: The case of an incinerator from rumor through operation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 28(2), 241-255. 56. Le, T., & Chizema, A. (2011). State ownership and firm performance: Evidence from the Chinese listed firms. Organizations and markets in emerging economies, 2, 72-90. 57. Leuz, C., & Oberholzer-Gee, F. (2006). Political relationships, global financing, and corporate transparency: Evidence from Indonesia. Journal of financial economics, 81, 411-439. 58. Levine, R., Lin, C., & Shen, B. (2020). Cross-border acquisitions: Do labor regulations affect acquirer returns?. Journal of International Business Studies, 51, 194-217. 59. Rajan, G., & Zingales, L. (1998). Power in a Theory of the Firm. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113, 387-432. 60. Rosenbaum, R., & Rubin, B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70, 41-55. 61. Sapienza, P. (2006). The effects of government ownership on bank lending. Journal of Financial Economics. World Bank Publications, 259-286. 62. Shi, H., Xu, H., & Zhang, X. (2018). Do politically connected independent directors create or destroy value?. Journal of Business Research, 83, 82-96. 63. Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1994). Politicians and firms. The quarterly journal of economics, 109(4), 995-1025. 64. Sun, Q., Tong, W. H., & Tong, J. (2002). How does government ownership affect firm performance? Evidence from China’s privatization experience. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 29, 1-27. 65. Tian, L., & Estrin, S. (2008). Retained state shareholding in Chinese PLCs: does government ownership always reduce corporate value?. Journal of Comparative Economics, 36, 74-89. 66. Vickers, J., & Yarrow, G. (1991). Economic perspectives on privatization. Journal of economic perspectives, 5, 111-132. 67. Zhu, H., & Chung, C. N. (2014). Portfolios of political ties and business group strategy in emerging economies: Evidence from Taiwan. Administrative Science Quarterly, 59, 599-638. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/85654 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 政治和商業兩者彼此關係向來密不可分，近年各國政府對於公司股權的持有水準不斷增加，許多文獻發現政府持股比率越高、政治關係越好之企業，營運的彈性較小、效率低，對公司價值產生負面影響；然而，其他文獻則指出，政府持股比率高、政治關係越好之企業，應有較高的企業治理水準與更多資源，並反映在其公司價值上。為了彌補上述之知識缺口，本文以台灣2007至2019期間1,565家上市櫃公司，並以差異中的差異法與傾向分數配對法，檢驗政府持股對公司價值之潛在影響。 其結果顯示，政府持股與公司價值呈現正相關；與沒有政治背景的公司相比，具政治關係的公司將有更高的公司價值；而具有政治關係之公司，政府持股對其公司價值之影響較不敏感。綜觀上述，通過調查台灣上市櫃公司董監事會成員之政治關係與公司之政府持股，發現這些「關係」也會對公司價值與經營績效產生重大影響。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Political and business have always been inextricably linked. In recent years, the level of government ownership in companies has been greatly increasing. Some literature suggests that firms with higher government ownership and better political connections have less flexibility and lower efficiency, which negatively affects their firm value while other literature indicates that government ownership and political connections ensure better corporate governance and more resources, which positively influence in their firm value. To fill this knowledge gap, this study examines the potential impact of government ownership and political connections on firm value using a difference-in-difference approach and a propensity score matching for 1,565 listed firms in Taiwan from 2007 to 2019. The results indicate that government ownership is positively correlated with company value; compared with companies without political connection, companies with better connections is more likely to have higher firm value and companies with higher government ownership have significantly lower sensitivity to their firm value. In summary, by investigating the political connections of board members of Taiwanese listed companies, we found that these 'guanxi' also have a significant impact on firm value and operating performance. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2023-03-19T23:20:41Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 U0001-2106202215553100.pdf: 1603683 bytes, checksum: c9f284169aa835c782dca0dea48d3305 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2022 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 中文摘要 i 英文摘要 ii 目錄 iii 圖目錄 v 表目錄 vi 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的與發現 3 第三節 研究架構、流程與方法 4 第二章 文獻回顧和假說建立 6 第一節 政府持股與公司價值 6 第二節 政治關係與公司價值 9 第三節 研究假說 12 第三章 資料介紹與研究方法 17 第一節 資料來源 17 第二節 變數介紹 18 第三節 研究方法 20 第四節 模型設計 23 第四章 分析結果與討論 26 第一節 樣本敘述統計 26 第二節 政府持股與政治關係 29 第三節 政府持股與公司價值 31 第五章 結論與建議 34 第一節 研究結論 34 第二節 管理意涵與未來展望 35 參考文獻 36 附錄 43 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 實證分析 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 政府持股 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 政治關係 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 公司價值 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | political connection | en |
| dc.subject | firm value | en |
| dc.subject | empirical analysis | en |
| dc.subject | government ownership | en |
| dc.title | 政府持股、政治關係與公司價值：以台灣上市櫃公司為例之實證研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Government Shareholding, Political Relationships, and Corporate Performance. An Empirical Study of Listed Companies in Taiwan | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 110-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 林修葳(Hsiou-Wei Lin),王曉雯(Hsiao-Wen Wang) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 政府持股,政治關係,公司價值,實證分析, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | government ownership,political connection,firm value,empirical analysis, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 44 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202201039 | |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2022-06-27 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 會計與管理決策組 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2022-07-29 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 會計與管理決策組 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| U0001-2106202215553100.pdf | 1.57 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。