Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 管理學院
  3. 會計學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/85527
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor林嬋娟(Chan-Jane Lin)
dc.contributor.authorHsiao-Yu Chenen
dc.contributor.author陳孝宇zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-19T23:18:00Z-
dc.date.copyright2022-07-26
dc.date.issued2022
dc.date.submitted2022-07-07
dc.identifier.citationAbbott, L. J., & Parker, S. 2000. Auditor selection and audit committee characteristics. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 19(2): 47-66. Alfraih, M. M. 2017. Choosing an external auditor: does the composition of boards of directors matter? International Journal of Law and Management, 59(3): 394-412. Barton, J. 2005. Who cares about auditor reputation? Contemporary Accounting Research, 22(3): 549-586. Beasley, M. S., & Petroni, K. R. 2001. Board independence and audit-firm type. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 20(1):97-114. Bell, T. B., Causholli, M., & Knechel, W. R. 2015. Audit firm tenure, non-audit services, and internal assessments of audit quality. Journal of Accounting Research, 53(3):461-509. Brown, S. V., & Knechel, W. R. 2016. Auditor–client compatibility and audit firm selection. Journal of Accounting Research, 54(3):725-775. Cannon, J. N., Lamboy-Ruiz, M. A., & Watanabe, O. 2018. The Influence of ownership type and the Affordable Care Act on earnings management in US Hospitals. Working paper. Available at SSRN 3149931. Chen, K. Y., & Zhou, J. 2007. Audit committee, board characteristics, and auditor switch decisions by Andersen's clients. Contemporary Accounting Research, 24(4):1085-1117. Cheng, S. H., Chen, C. C., & Chang, W. L. 2009. Hospital response to a global budget program under universal health insurance in Taiwan. Health Policy, 92(2-3):158-164. Chang, Y. F., Chiu, P. Y. & Tseng, C. H. 2007. Determinants of Auditor Selections by Private Colleges and Universities. Journal of Accounting and Corporate Governance, 4(2): 23-43. (in Chinese) Clatworthy, M. A., Makepeace, G. H., & Peel, M. J. 2009. Selection bias and the Big Four premium: new evidence using Heckman and matching models. Accounting and Business Research, 39(2), 139-166. Control Yuan, 2019, Report:108內調0033, Control Yuan website, address: https://www.cy.gov.tw/sp.asp?xdURL=./di/RSS/detail.asp&ctNode=871&mp=1&no=6521 search date:November 17, 2019. DeAngelo, L. E. 1981. Auditor size and audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3(3): 183-199. DeFond, M. L. 1992. The association between changes in client firm agency costs and auditor switching. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 11(1): 16. Eldenburg, L., & Krishnan, R. 2003. Public versus private governance: A study of incentives and operational performance. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 35(3): 377-404. Eldenburg, L. G., Krishnan, H. A., & Krishnan, R. 2017. Management accounting and control in the hospital industry: A review. Journal of Governmental & Nonprofit Accounting, 6(1): 52-91. Eldenburg, L., Hermalin, B. E., Weisbach, M. S., & Wosinska, M. 2004. Governance, performance objectives and organizational form: evidence from hospitals. Journal of Corporate Finance, 10(4): 527-548. Eshleman, J. D., & Guo, P. 2014. Do Big 4 auditors provide higher audit quality after controlling for the endogenous choice of auditor? Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 33(4): 197-219. Executive Yuan, 2019, Resolution of 2909 Yuan meeting, Executive Yuan website,address: https://www.ey.gov.tw/Page/4EC2394BE4EE9DD0/05d6865d-7db5-41bd-b28e-cd59f90336f5 search date:December 15, 2019. Fang, J., Pittman, J., Zhang, Y., & Zhao, Y. 2017. Auditor choice and its implications for group‐affiliated firms. Contemporary Accounting Research, 34(1): 39-82. Francis, J. R., Maydew, E. L., & Sparks, H. C. 1999. The role of Big 6 auditors in the credible reporting of accruals. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 18(2): 17-34. Francis, J. R., & Wilson, E. R. 1988. Auditor changes: A joint test of theories relating to agency costs and auditor differentiation. The Accounting Review, Vol. LXIII. No.4: 663-682. Fung, S. Y. K., Raman, K. K., & Zhu, X. K. 2017. Does the PCAOB international inspection program improve audit quality for non-US-listed foreign clients? Journal of Accounting and Economics, 64(1), 15-36. Guedhami, O., Pittman, J. A., & Saffar, W. 2014. Auditor choice in politically connected firms. Journal of Accounting Research, 52(1): 107-162. Habib, A., Wu, J., Bhuiyan, M. B. U., & Sun, X. 2019. Determinants of auditor choice: Review of the empirical literature. International Journal of Auditing, 23(2): 308-335. Harris, E. E., Tate, S. L., & Zimmerman, A. B. 2019. Does Hiring a Local Industry Specialist Auditor Matter to Nonprofit Organizations? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 48(3):633-664. Haw, I.-M., Qi, D., & Wu, W. 2008. The economic consequence of voluntary auditing. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 23(1): 63-93. Hay, D., & Davis, D. 2004. The voluntary choice of an auditor of any level of quality. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 23(2): 37-53. He, X., Rui, O., Zheng, L., & Zhu, H. 2014 Foreign ownership and auditor choice. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 33(4): 401-418. Heckman, J. J. 1979. Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 47(1): 153-161. Ho, J. L., & Kang, F. 2013. Auditor choice and audit fees in family firms: Evidence from the S&P 1500. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 32(4), 71-93. Holzhacker, M., Krishnan, R., & Mahlendorf, M. D. 2015. The impact of changes in regulation on cost behavior. Contemporary Accounting Research, 32(2): 534-566. Hope, O.-K., Kang, T., Thomas, W., & Yoo, Y. K. 2008. Culture and auditor choice: A test of the secrecy hypothesis. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 27(5): 357-373. Houqe, M. N., Monem, R. M., & van Zijl, T. 2012. Government quality, auditor choice and adoption of IFRS: A cross country analysis. Advances in Accounting, 28(2): 307-316. Hung, L. C., & Lin, Y. Y. 2010. Financial Disclosure of Non-Profit Hospitals in Taiwan. Journal of Public Administration, 37: 37-70. (in Chinese) Huang, X., & Kang, F. 2018. Company reputation and auditor choice: evidence from fortune 1000 companies. Accounting Research Journal, 31(2): 232-248. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. 1976 Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3(4): 305-360. Johnson, W. B., & Lys, T. 1990. The market for audit services: Evidence from voluntary auditor changes. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 12(1-3):281-308. Keating, E. K., Fischer, M., Gordon, T. P., & Greenlee, J. 2005. The single audit act: How compliant are nonprofit organizations? Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 17(3):285-309. Khurana, I. K., & Raman, K. 2004. Litigation risk and the financial reporting credibility of Big 4 versus non-Big 4 audits: Evidence from Anglo-American countries. The Accounting Review, 79(2): 473-495. Kitching, K. 2009. Audit value and charitable organizations. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 28(6): 510-524. Knechel, W. R., & Payne, J. L. 2001. Additional evidence on audit report lag. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 20(1): 137-146. Krishnan, G. V. 2003. Audit quality and the pricing of discretionary accruals. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 22(1): 109-126. Krishnan, J., & Schauer, P. C. 2000. The differentiation of quality among auditors: Evidence from the not-for-profit sector. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 19(2):9-25. Krishnan, R., & Yetman, M. H. 2011. Institutional drivers of reporting decisions in nonprofit hospitals. Journal of Accounting Research, 49(4):1001-1039. Lai, K. M., Srinidhi, B., Gul, F. A., & Tsui, J. S. 2017. Board gender diversity, auditor fees, and auditor choice. Contemporary Accounting Research, 34(3): 1681-1714. Lambert, R. A., & Larcker, D. F. 1995. The prospective payment system, hospital efficiency, and compensation contracts for senior-level hospital administrators. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 14(1):1-31. Lamoreaux, P. T. 2016. Does PCAOB inspection access improve audit quality? An examination of foreign firms listed in the United States. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 61(2-3), 313-337. Lawrence, A., Minutti-Meza, M., & Zhang, P. 2011. Can Big 4 versus non-Big 4 differences in audit-quality proxies be attributed to client characteristics? The Accounting Review, 86(1): 259-286. Lee, J. Z., & Lin, H. F. 2013. Is the Audit Quality of Big4 Better than Non-Big4? Evidence from Ability of CPA Firm to Restrict Earnings Management-The Importance of Controlling Self-Selection Bias. Taiwan Accounting Review, 9(1):77-110. (in Chinese) Leone, A. J., & R. L. Van Horn. 2005. How do nonprofit hospitals manage earnings? Journal of Health Economics, 24(4): 815-837. Lennox, C., & Pittman, J. A. 2010 Big Five audits and accounting fraud. Contemporary Accounting Research 27(1): 209-247. Lin, C. L., OuYan, W. S., Wang, K. H. & Kuo, H. C. 2018. How Do CPAs’ Gender Affect the Debt Financing Level of Medical Foundations? Taiwan Academy of Management Journal, 18(2):49-70. (in Chinese) Lin, C. L., & Lai, Y. W. 2017. The Effect of Audit Characteristics on Financial Manipulation Level of Not-for-Profit Hospitals. Journal of Management and Compliance, 2(1): 21-46. (in Chinese) Lin, C. L., Li, P. Y., Wang, K. H. & Huang, C. H. 2020. How Board Gender Diversity Affects Auditor Industry Expertise Selection: Evidence from Taiwanese Medical Foundations. Taiwan Academy of Management Journal, 20(2): 1-23. (in Chinese) Lin, Z. J., & Liu, M. 2009. The impact of corporate governance on auditor choice: Evidence from China. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 18(1): 44-59. Liu, X., & Mills, A. 2007. Agency theory and its applications in health care. Public Ends, Private Means: Strategic Purchasing of Health Services, 151-78. National Health Insurance Administration, 2013, National Health Insurance in Taiwan 2013-2014 Annual Report. Ministry of Health and Welfare, 2014, The report of how to improve financial transparency mechanism of medical care foundations, Ministry of Health and Welfare website,address: https://dep.mohw.gov.tw/CLU/cp-619-1492-122.html search date:December 10, 2019. Ministry of Health and Welfare, 2022, National Health Expenditure 2020, Ministry of Health and Welfare website,address: https://dep.mohw.gov.tw/dos/lp-5071-113.html search date:June 26, 2022. Owhoso, V. E., Messier, Jr, W. F., & Lynch, Jr, J. G. 2002. Error detection by industry‐specialized teams during sequential audit review. Journal of Accounting Research, 40(3):883-900. Reheul, A.-M., Van Caneghem, T., Van den Bogaerd, M., & Verbruggen, S. 2017. Auditor gender, experience and reporting in nonprofit organizations. Managerial Auditing Journal, 32(6): 550-577. Reheul, A.-M., Van Caneghem, T., Van den Bogaerd, M., & Verbruggen, S. 2018. Economic consequences of hiring an auditor with industry expertise: An empirical analysis among NPOs. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 47(1): 126-145. Saxton, G. D., Kuo, J. S., & Ho, Y. C. 2012. The determinants of voluntary financial disclosure by nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 41(6): 1051-1071. Srinidhi, B. N., He, S., & Firth, M. 2014. The effect of governance on specialist auditor choice and audit fees in US family firms. The Accounting Review, 89(6): 2297-2329. Tan, H. F. 2011. Earnings management in Non-Profit Hospitals-Evidence from Taiwan. International Journal of Electronic Business Management, 9(3): 243-257. Tan, H. F. and Wu, T. Z. 2012. Tax-Motivated Earnings Manipulation by Nonprofit Hospitals. Journal of Accounting and Corporate Governance, 8(2):1-25. (in Chinese) Tate, S. L. 2007. Auditor change and auditor choice in nonprofit organizations. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 26(1): 47-70. Teoh, S. H., & Wong, T. J. 1993. Perceived auditor quality and the earnings response coefficient. The Accounting Review, 68(2): 346-366. Wang, Q., Wong, T.-J., & Xia, L. 2008. State ownership, the institutional environment, and auditor choice: Evidence from China. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 46(1): 112-134. Vansant, B. 2016. Institutional pressures to provide social benefits and the earnings management behavior of nonprofits: Evidence from the US hospital industry. Contemporary Accounting Research, 33(4):1576-1600. Wen, Y. C., Huang, P., Shen, H. C., & Zhang, Y. 2019. The role of organizational forms in nonprofit firms' real earnings management: Evidence from nonprofit hospitals in Taiwan. Advances in Accounting, 46:1-11. Yan, Y. H., Hsu, S., Yang, C. W., & Fang, S. C. 2010. Agency problems in hospitals participating in self-management project under global budget system in Taiwan. Health Policy, 94(2): 135-143. Yan, Y. H., Kung, C. M., Fang, S. C., & Chen, Y. 2017. Transparency of mandatory information disclosure and concerns of health services providers and consumers. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14(1):53. Yan, Y. H., Yang, C. W., & Fang, S. C. 2014. Agency problems of global budget system in Taiwan's National Health Insurance. Health Policy, 116(1): 37-50.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/85527-
dc.description.abstract近年來,臺灣醫院之財務報告品質及董事會功能受到主管機關及外界關注之程度日益增加。為回應外界批評,醫療法人需向衛生福利部申報經董事會通過,且經會計師查核簽證之年度財務報告,再經衛生福利部聘請外部專家審查。衛生福利部並自2007年起公布醫療財團法人之財務報告及其審查意見,醫療社團法人則未公布。此外,中央健康保險署為遵循二代健保資訊公開之原則,自2013年起公開領有健保費用一定金額以上醫院,經會計師查核簽證之財務報告,以利外界課責。然而,現行主管機關對於不同型態之醫院財務報告,有不同之管理及揭露機制,其代理成本(監督成本)不同。據監察院2019年之調查報告指出,部分醫療財團法人之財務報告雖經會計師查核簽證,仍經衛生福利部發現諸多缺失,顯示部分醫院之財報品質及審計品質有待加強。再者,現行醫療法尚無對醫療法人董事會需具有獨立性,或需具有財務專長董事之規範。鑑於現行主管機關對於不同型態之醫院財務報告,有不同之監督機制,又董事會之有效性亦為醫院治理之重要因素,皆為可能影響醫院選擇會計師之因素,進而影響財務報告品質及審計品質,然目前尚乏足夠之實證研究作為政策修訂之基礎。因此,為了填補實證研究之不足,本研究探討臺灣醫院之組織型態及董事會組成,對其選擇會計師之關聯,並進一步探討會計師選擇對財務報告品質及審計品質之影響。實證結果顯示,醫療財團法人較醫療社團法人及私立醫療機構等營利醫院更可能選擇四大或產業專家會計師事務所之會計師,又外部財務專長董事比率越高,及內部醫療專長董事比率越高之醫療財團法人,較可能選擇四大會計師事務所之會計師。再者,選擇四大或產業專家會計師事務所會計師之私立醫療機構,提列較少之裁決性健保核減數,代表四大或產業專家會計師事務所抑制盈餘管理之程度較高。另選擇四大或產業專家會計師事務所之醫療財團法人,收到主管機關對於財報之審查意見較少,代表四大或產業專家會計師有較好之審計品質。本研究之發現,可供主管機關作為改善醫院財務報告監督機制及醫院管理制度之參考。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractIn recent years, the quality of financial reports in Taiwan’s hospital industry and the effectiveness of the board have received significant attention from regulators and the public. This study mainly aims to investigate whether hospital organization form and board characteristics affect auditor choice of hospitals in Taiwan. Furthermore, it examines the effect of auditor choice on audit quality. The results indicate that medical care foundations are more likely to choose Big N auditors and audit specialists compared to for-profit hospitals. In addition, I found that medical care foundations with more outside board directors and inside medical board members are more likely to choose a Big N auditor. Regarding the effects of auditor choice, the results suggest that private hospitals choosing Big N auditors and audit specialists are more likely to report less discretionary accruals of NHIA deduction. Moreover, I found that medical care foundations choosing Big N auditors and audit specialists are more likely to receive fewer comments from the review committee appointed by MHW. The research findings provide practical and policy implications for the regulator to consider revising the requirements of financial reports and governance of hospitals.en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2023-03-19T23:18:00Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
U0001-0507202219402800.pdf: 1143645 bytes, checksum: bc487b149f50d624fd3e66a0f8732fb9 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2022
en
dc.description.tableofcontentsContent 誌謝 II 摘要 III Abstract IV 1.Introduction 1 2.Background and Literature Review 7 2.1 Institutional background 7 2.2 Agency theory applied to the health care sector 10 2.3 The determinants of auditor choice 11 2.4 The effects of auditor choice 14 3.Hypotheses Development 16 4.Research Design 22 5.Analysis and Results 27 5.1 Data Sources and Sample Selection 27 5.2 Descriptive Statistics 29 5.3 Main Tests 37 5.3.1 Organization Form and Auditor Choice 37 5.3.2 Board Characteristic and Auditor Choice 39 5.3.3 The Auditor Choice and its Effects 42 6.Additional Test 49 6.1 The Effect of Auditor Choice on Audit Report Lag 49 6.2 Comparison between Medical Care Foundations audited by different Auditors 53 7.Conclusions 55 References 57 Appendix 63
dc.language.isoen
dc.subject醫院組織型態zh_TW
dc.subject會計師選擇zh_TW
dc.subject醫療法人zh_TW
dc.subject醫院管理zh_TW
dc.subject審計品質zh_TW
dc.subjectMedical juridical personsen
dc.subjectAuditor choiceen
dc.subjectAudit qualityen
dc.subjectHospital organization formen
dc.subjectHospital governanceen
dc.title醫療產業會計師選擇與財務報表品質之研究zh_TW
dc.titleAuditor Choice and Financial Report Quality in Hospital Industryen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear110-2
dc.description.degree博士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee劉順仁(Shuen-Zen Liu),陳坤志(Kun-Chin Chen),何耕宇(Keng-Yu Ho),戚務君(Wu-Chun Chi),郭振雄(Jenn-Shyong Kuo)
dc.subject.keyword會計師選擇,審計品質,醫院組織型態,醫院管理,醫療法人,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordAuditor choice,Audit quality,Hospital organization form,Hospital governance,Medical juridical persons,en
dc.relation.page63
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU202201292
dc.rights.note同意授權(全球公開)
dc.date.accepted2022-07-08
dc.contributor.author-college管理學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept會計學研究所zh_TW
dc.date.embargo-lift2022-07-26-
顯示於系所單位:會計學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
U0001-0507202219402800.pdf1.12 MBAdobe PDF檢視/開啟
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved