請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/85444完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 林耀盛(Yaw-Sheng Lin) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ling-Yuan Kuo | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 郭令元 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-03-19T23:16:42Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2022-07-22 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2022 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2022-07-16 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 王雅婷（2017）：《鄉村型態安︎照顧者之照顧處境探究：以「居家」為視域》（未出版碩士論文）。國立政治大學。 立法院。安寧緩和條例（2011年1月20日）。取自全國法規資料庫。https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=l0020066 安瑪莉‧摩爾（2018）：《照護的邏輯：比賦予病患選擇更重要的事》（吳嘉苓、陳嘉新、黃于玲、謝新誼、蕭昭君譯）。左岸。（原著出版年：2008年） 何雪綾（2015）：《社區醫療照護模式中末期患者家屬參與患者之「預立醫療計劃討論 」的心理歷程特徵 》（未出版博士論文）。國立臺灣大學。https://doi:10.6342/NTU.2015.00199 何雪綾、林耀盛、吳英璋（2017）：〈末期患者家屬參與［預立醫療計劃］的討論行為〉。《中華心理衛生學刊》，30，295-320. http://dx.doi.org/10.30074%2fFJMH.201709_30(3).0003 余安邦（2014）：〈倫理性護理照顧意味著什麼？人文臨床學觀點〉。《護理雜誌》，61（5），19–25。https://doi:10.6224/JN.61.5.19 余德慧、李維倫、林耀盛、余安邦、陳淑惠、許敏桃、謝碧玲、石世明（2004）：〈倫理療癒作為建構臨床心理學本土化的起點〉。《本土心理學研究》，22，253 – 325。https://doi.org/10.6254/IPRCS 余德慧、石世明、夏淑怡、王英偉（2006）：〈病床陪伴的心理機制：一個二元複合模式的提出〉。《應用心理研究》，（29），71-100。 余德慧、石世明、夏淑怡（2006）：〈探討癌末處境[聖世界] 的形成〉。《生死學研究》，3，1–58。https://doi.org/10.29844/JLDS.200601.0001 余德慧、李維倫、林蒔慧、夏淑怡（2008）：〈心靈療遇之非技術探討：貼近病人的柔適照顧配置研究〉。《生死學研究》，8， 1-39。http://dx.doi.org/ 10.29844/JLDS.200807.0001 余德慧、林耀盛、李維倫（2008）：〈倫理化的可能—臨床心理學本土化進路的重探〉。見余安邦（主編）：《本土心理與文化療癒—倫理化的可能探問》，頁 149-206 。台北：中央研究院民族學研究所。 李維倫（2004）：〈以 ［置身所在］做為心理學研究的目標現象及其相關之方法論〉。《應用心理研究》，（22），157-200。 李維倫、賴憶嫺（2009）：〈現象學方法論：存在行動的投入〉。《中華輔導與諮商學報》，25，275-321。http://dx.doi.org/10.7082%2fCJGC.200903.0275 李弘毅、林耀盛（2021）：〈精神病院裡雙重患病經驗詮釋：思覺失調症患者罹癌生活世界〉。《中華心理衛生學刊》，34（3），261-290。http://dx.doi.org/10.30074%2fFJMH.202109_34(3).0003 汪文聖（2019） ：《現象學作為一種實踐哲學：胡塞爾・海德格・鄂蘭的倫理、政治與宗教哲學》。聯經出版公司。 林耀盛（2009）：〈逆向呈現與過度呈現之間: 慢性病患者的身心受苦經驗〉。《生死學研究》，（9），1-43。http://dx.doi.org/10.29844%2fJLDS.200901.0001 林耀盛（2012）：〈正常與存有：精神病理的反思實踐〉。《身心障礙研究季刊》，10（3），226-238。 林耀盛（2016）：〈行深：［臨床］、［臨終］、［治癒］和［療遇］交錯的人文徵候及其超越〉。《本土心理學研究》，（46），195-237。http://dx.doi.org/10.6254%2f2016.46.195 林耀盛、王雅婷（已接受）：〈面容倫理：鄉村型居家安寧照顧者的置身所在〉。《本土心理學研究》。 林耀盛、邱子芸（2015）：〈臨終處境的陪伴轉化：癌末病患及其照顧者心理經驗與存在現象探究〉。《中華心理衛生學刊》，28（2），189-219。http://dx.doi.org/10.30074%2fFJMH.201506_28(2).0002 林耀盛、吳英璋（2004）：〈雙重變奏曲：探究「九二一」地震「失親家毀」受創者之心理經驗現象〉。《中華心理衛生學刊》，17（2），1-41。 http://dx.doi.org/10.30074%2fFJMH.200406_17(2).0001 林耀盛、李弘毅（2016）：〈朝向疾病的療癒：血液透析者心理經驗之詮釋〉。《本土心理學研究》，（45），129-174。https://doi:10.6254/2016.45.129。 林耀盛、李維倫（2018）：〈受苦現象與哀傷情感：人文臨床心理學取向的探問〉。《中華心理衛生學刊》，31（3），215-225。http://dx.doi.org/10.30074%2fFJMH.201809_31(3).0001 林耀盛、張維真（2017）：〈八八水患災後心理療癒：排灣族受災者存有經驗的現象探索〉。《哲學與文化》，44（8），85-102。 林耀盛、蔡逸鈴（2012）：〈不可承受之重：癌末主要照顧者的心思經驗探究〉。《教育與心理研究》，35，37-66。 胡綾真、陳美伶、陳明岐、林佳靜、林玲華（2001）：〈轉移性癌症病患之居家主要照顧者的照顧負荷及其影響因素〉。《 長庚護理》，12（4），282-293。http://dx.doi.org/10.6386%2fCGN.200112_12(4).0003 高舒（2018）：《［喪親］與 ［家］的現象召喚及流變關係探究：癌症喪親主體視域》（未出版碩士論文）。取自華藝線上圖書館。http://dx.doi.org/10.6814%2fTHE.NCCU.PSY.001.2018.C01 翁士恆、彭榮邦（2021）：〈敘事研究中［存在經驗］與［存有］的地理學方法探問：從情緒地理學與詮釋現象學取［徑］〉。《中華輔導與諮商學報》，（61），119-151。http://dx.doi.org/10.3966/172851862021050061005 翁瑞萱、徐愫萱、施至遠、黃勝堅（2015）：〈臺灣社區安寧居家療護之現在與未來〉。《護理雜誌》，62（2），18-24。http://dx.doi.org/10.6224%2fJN.62.2.18 財團法人國家衛生研究院 （2019）。臺灣安寧緩和療護政策白皮書。取自：https://lib.nhri.edu.tw/NewWeb/nhri/ebook/39000000464078.pdf 楊于婷、林耀盛（2021）：〈臨床心理學於安寧緩和場域之反思踐行〉。《中華心理學刊》，63（2）， 203-223。http://dx.doi.org/10.6129%2fCJP.202106_63(2).0006 張維真、林耀盛（2012）：〈天然災害倖存者的心理現象：以八八風災災民為例〉。《高雄行為科學學刊》，（3），95-124。http://dx.doi.org/10.29854%2fTJKBS.201205.0004 陳惠津、李怡娟、吳肖琪（1998）：〈 影響居家癌病患者家庭照顧者需要因素之研究〉。《中華公共衛生雜誌》，17（5）， 412-422。http://dx.doi.org/10.6288%2fCJPH1998-17-05-07 廖欽彬（2010) ：〈和辻哲郎的風土論—兼論洪耀勳與貝瑞克的風土觀〉。《華梵人文學報》，14，63-94。http://dx.doi.org/10.29930%2fHJH.201006.0003 魏書娥、許煌汶、林姿妙（2004）：〈安寧緩和療護理念與醫學根源〉。《安寧療護雜誌》，9（4）， 407-416。http://dx.doi.org/10.6537%2fTJHPC.2004.9(4).7 Aho, K. A. (2016). Heidegger, ontological death, and the healing professions. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 19(1), 55-63. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11019-015-9639-4 Bastawrous, M. (2013). Caregiver burden—A critical discussion. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 50(3), 431-441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2012.10.005 Baqutayan, S. M. S. (2015). Stress and coping mechanisms: A historical overview. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(2 S1), 479-479. http://dx.doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n2s1p479 Beckman, J. (2018, April/May). The roaming empire. 1843 Magazine. Retrieved from https://www.1843magazine.com Bergman, M., Graff, C., Eriksdotter, M., Fugl-Meyer, K. S., & Schuster, M. (2016). The meaning of living close to a person with Alzheimer disease. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 19(3), 341-349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-016-9696-3 Bishop, J. P. (2011). The anticipatory corpse: Medicine, power, and the care of the dying. University of Notre Dame Pess. Brenner, P. R. (1985). Hospice applications of family systems theory: A helpfulaid to programs. American Journal of Hospice Care, 2(6), 13-16. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F104990918500200602 Brown, M. (2003). Hospice and the spatial paradoxes of terminal care. Environment and Planning A, 35(5), 833-851. https://doi.org/10.1068/a35121 Choi, S., & Seo, J. (2019, April). Analysis of caregiver burden in palliative care: An integrated review. Nursing Forum, 54(2), 280-290. https://doi.org/10.1111/nuf.12328 Davidson, J., & Milligan, C. (2004). Embodying emotion sensing space: Introducing emotional geographies. Social & Cultural Geography, 5(4), 523-532. https://doi.org/10.1080/1464936042000317677 Dekkers, W. (2011). Dwelling, house and home: Towards a home-led perspective on dementia care. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 14(3), 291-300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-011-9307-2 Delalibera, M., Presa, J., Coelho, A., Barbosa, A., & Franco, M. H. P. (2015). Family dynamics during the grieving process: A systematic literature review. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, 20, 1119-1134. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232015204.09562014 Dumont, I., Dumont, S., & Mongeau, S. (2008). End-of-life care and the grieving process: Family caregivers who have experienced the loss of a terminal-phase cancer patient. Qualitative Health Research, 18(8), 1049-1061. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732308320110 Ellingsen, S., Roxberg, Å., Kristoffersen, K., Rosland, J. H., & Alvsvåg, H. (2013). Entering a world with no future: A phenomenological study describing the embodied experience of time when living with severe incurable disease. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 27(1), 165–174. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6712.2012.01019.x Epstein-Lubow, G., Davis, J. D., Miller, I. W., & Tremont, G. (2008). Persisting burden predicts depressive symptoms in dementia caregivers. Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology, 21(3), 198-203. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891988708320972 Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish : the birth of the prison. New York : Pantheon Books. Foucault, M. (1993). On the genealogy of ethics: An overview of work in progress. In H.Dreyfus & P. Rabinow (Eds.), Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago. Funk, L., Stajduhar, K. I., Toye, C., Aoun, S., Grande, G. E., & Todd, C. J. (2010). Part 2: Home-based family caregiving at the end of life: A comprehensive review of published qualitative research (1998-2008). Palliative Medicine, 24(6), 594-607. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269216310371411 Gitlin, L. N. (2003). Conducting research on home environments: Lessons learned and new directions. The Gerontologist, 43(5), 628-637. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/43.5.628 Gordon, A., & Rooney, A. (1984). Hospice and the family: A systems approach to assessment: Family systems theory is applicable to hospice caregiving. American Journal of Hospice Care, 1(1), 31-33. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F104990918400100108 Hudson, P. (2003). Home‐based support for palliative care families: Challenges and recommendations. Medical Journal of Australia, 179, S35-S17. https://doi.org/10.5694/j.1326-5377.2003.tb05576.x Iecovich, E. (2014). Aging in place: From theory to practice. Anthropological Notebooks, 20(1). Kramer, B. J., Kavanaugh, M., Trentham-Dietz, A., Walsh, M., & Yonker, J. A. (2011). Complicated grief symptoms in caregivers of persons with lung cancer: The role of family conflict, intrapsychic strains, and hospice utilization. OMEGA-Journal of Death and Dying, 62(3), 201-220. https://doi.org/10.2190%2Fom.62.3.a Ladha, A., Nevala, W. K., Lee, S., Vierkant, R. A., & Kaur, J. S. (2018). What is the personal immune price for hospice caregivers? A case-control study. Archives of Palliative Care and Medicine, 2. https://doi.org/10.29011/2689-9825.000011 Lazarus, R., & Folkman, S. (1985). If it changes it must be a process: Study of emotion and coping during three stages of a college examination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 150-170. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.48.1.150 Manzo, L. C. (2003). Beyond house and haven: Toward a revisioning of emotional relationships with places. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23(1), 47-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00074-9 Morris, S. M., King, C., Turner, M., & Payne, S. (2015). Family carers providing support to a person dying in the home setting: a narrative literature review. Palliative medicine, 29(6), 487-495. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269216314565706 Nadeau, J. W. (2001). Meaning making in family bereavement: A family systems approach. In M. S. Stroebe, R. O. Hansson, W. Stroebe, & H. Schut (Eds.), Handbook of bereavement research: Consequences, coping, and care (pp. 329–347). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10436-014 Nagington, M., Holman, D., Mumford, C., & McCann, L. (2021). Theorising the hospice gaze: A Foucauldian collaborative ethnography of a palliative day care service. Social Science & Medicine, 291, 114470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114470 O'Connor, D. L. (2007). Self-identifying as a caregiver: Exploring the positioning process. Journal of Aging Studies, 21(2), 165-174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2006.06.002 Öhlén, J., Ekman, I., Zingmark, K., Bolmsjö, I., & Benzein, E. (2014). Conceptual development of “at-homeness” despite illness and disease: A review. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being, 9(1), 23677. https://doi.org/10.3402/qhw.v9.23677 Ordille, J. (2016). Phenomenology in end-of-life care: Implications for philosophy and clinical practice. Clinical Social Work Journal, 44(2), 170-178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-015-0536-3 Osse, B. H., Vernooij-Dassen, M. J., Schadé, E., & Grol, R. P. (2006). Problems experienced by the informal caregivers of cancer patients and their needs for support. Cancer Nursing, 29(5), 378-388. https://doi.org/10.1097/00002820-200609000-00005 Patterson, L. B., & Dorfman, L. T. (2002). Family support for hospice caregivers. American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine®, 19(5), 315-323. https://doi.org/10.1177/104990910201900507 Pearlin, L. I., Menaghan, E. G., Lieberman, M. A., & Mullan, J. T. (1981). The stress process. Journal of Health and Social behavior, 337-356. https://doi.org/10.2307/2136676 Pearlin, L. I., Mullan, J. T., Semple, S. J., & Skaff, M. M. (1990). Caregiving and the stress process: An overview of concepts and their measures. The gerontologist, 30(5), 583-594. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/30.5.583 Proot, I. M., Abu‐Saad, H. H., Crebolder, H. F., Goldsteen, M., Luker, K. A., & Widdershoven, G. A. (2003). Vulnerability of family caregivers in terminal palliative care at home; balancing between burden and capacity. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 17(2), 113-121. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1471-6712.2003.00220.x Roush, C. V., & Cox, J. E. (2000). The meaning of home: How it shapes the practice of home and hospice care. Home Healthcare Now, 18(6), 388-394. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004045-200006000-00015 Rowles, G. D. (1983). Between worlds: A relocation dilemma for the Appalachian elderly. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 17 (4), 301–315. https://doi.org/10.2190/X2UF-RQ0V-BLN5-GDCN Rubinstein, R. L. (1990). Culture and disorder in the home care experience: The home as sickroom. In J. F. Gubrium & A. Sankar (Eds.). The home care experience: Ethnography and policy (pp. 37–58). Newbury Park: Sage Rubinstein, R. L., & Parmelee, P. A. (1993). Attachment to place and the representation of the life course by the elderly. In I. Altman & S. M. Low (Eds.). Place at- tachment (Vol. 12, pp. 139–163). New York: Plenum Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-8753-4_7 Scott, L. D. (2001). Technological caregiving: A qualitative perspective. Home Health Care Management & Practice, 13(3), 227-235. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F108482230101300308 Seamon, D. (1979). A geography of the life world: Movement, rest and encounter. London: Croom-Helm. Somerfield, M. R., & McCrae, R. R. (2000). Stress and coping research: Methodological challenges, theoretical advances, and clinical applications. American psychologist, 55(6), 620. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0003-066X.55.6.620 Stajduhar, K. I., Funk, L., Toye, C., Grande, G. E., Aoun, S., & Todd, C. J. (2010). Part 1: Home-based family caregiving at the end of life: A comprehensive review of published quantitative research (1998-2008). Palliative Medicine, 24(6), 573-593. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269216310371412 Svenaeus, F. (2001). The phenomenology of health and illness. In Toombs, S. K. (Ed.), Handbook of phenomenology and medicine (pp. 87-108). Springer, Dordrecht. Van Manen, M. (2002). Care-as-worry, or “don’t worry, be happy”. Qualitative Health Research, 12(2), 262-278. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F104973202129119784 Waldron, E. A., Janke, E. A., Bechtel, C. F., Ramirez, M., & Cohen, A. (2013). A systematic review of psychosocial interventions to improve cancer caregiver quality of life. Psycho‐Oncology, 22(6), 1200-1207. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.3118 Wright, A. A., Zhang, B., Ray, A., Mack, J. W., Trice, E., Balboni, T., Mitchell, S. L., Jakson, V. A., Block, S. D., Maciejewski, P. K. & Prigerson, H. G. (2008). Associations between end-of-life discussions, patient mental health, medical care near death, and caregiver bereavement adjustment. Jama, 300(14), 1665-1673. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.300.14.1665 Zingmark, K., Norberg, A., & Sandman, P. O. (1995). The experience of being at home throughout the life span. Investigation of persons aged from 2 to 102. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 41(1), 47-62. https://doi.org/10.2190/n08l-42j5-31d2-juqa | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/85444 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本研究目的探究家屬照顧者於居家安寧場域的處境經驗，期望瞭解居家安寧對照顧者的意義、居家安寧照顧處境中照顧者與他人的關係將如何開展、家的特殊性如何影響照顧經驗等議題。本研究將採用半結構式深度訪談，以東部某醫療院所提供之居家安寧療護服務區域為研究田野，錄音蒐集共六位家屬照顧者之訪談資料，每位受訪者接受二次訪談，受訪者性別為二女四男，年齡介於45至75歲之間，並透過李維倫與賴憶嫺（2009）提出之現象學分析方法進行資料分析，以現象學心理學的觀點，貼近受訪者之生活世界，以深入瞭解家屬照顧者之置身所在。研究結果將從參與者的處境經驗提出三個面向的討論，包含居家安寧照顧中的居家經驗、居家安寧照顧中的關係性、居家安寧照顧中的家屋空間，並嘗試探討醫療場域與居家安寧場域之間的共同性與殊異性，以此凸顯居家安寧場域的獨特性。研究發現，居家安寧的家庭體驗在疾病的影響下，照顧者可能依循醫療的規範行事，亦可能有投入當下「無目的」居家時間，在與病者彼此陪伴之下感到安適；而家庭關聯的家屬、鄰里、看護等關係中的非技術性陪伴關懷，帶出柔適照顧的可能，並於此自在互動中得以接應照顧者的苦。另外，家屋空間中的歷史痕跡、情感連結與歸返之地的意涵，使居家安寧場域中的病者與照顧者開展療癒的可能。透過居家安寧照顧處境之經驗，拓展理解居家安寧照顧者的角度，以提供適當的醫療支持服務，並作為發展未來居家安寧相關服務的參考。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | This research starts a homeward journey of the situational experiences of family caregivers in home-based hospice, to explore (1) the meaning of home-based hospice for the family caregiver, (2) the relations between the family caregiver and others, including the patient, other family members and informal caregiver, and (3) the differences between home care and hospital care. We applied the participatory observation and depth interview to collect data. Six family caregivers of four males and two females, aged 45 to 75 who agreed the informed consent were recruited from home-based palliative care service in eastern Taiwan and were interviewed twice. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed by a phenomenological psychology method. The data analysis procedures of carrying out phenomenological psychology were based on six steps: data collection, empathic immersion, meaning units, constituent themes, situated structure, and general structure. The results revealed three themes： (1) the living experience at the home of caregivers, (2) the relationship of caregivers, (3) the meaning of home space, and further discusses the similarities and differences between home and hospital. The outcome implied that the companionship from family members, neighbors, and other informal caregivers in everyday activities may provide supportive effectiveness to caregivers and patients. Home as a meaningful place offers the sense of healing to the patient and his family. We discussed the role and benefit of home-based hospice in healthcare service. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2023-03-19T23:16:42Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 U0001-1507202210041400.pdf: 2503139 bytes, checksum: 5f68275b081f5a211bd722695e02350c (MD5) Previous issue date: 2022 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 審定書 i 中文摘要 ii 英文摘要 iii 第一章 緒論 1 第二章 文獻回顧 4 第一節 居家安寧照顧相關研究 4 第二節 居家安寧照顧處境 7 第三節 「家」在居家安寧照顧中的特殊性 11 第四節 研究問題 15 第三章 研究方法 16 第一節 研究取徑 16 第二節 研究田野與對象 17 第三節 研究流程 17 第四節 分析方法 18 第四章 分析結果 22 第一節 受訪者背景描述 22 第二節 家屬照顧者置身結構 24 第三節 小結 37 第五章 綜合討論 39 第一節 居家安寧照顧中的居家經驗 39 第二節 居家安寧照顧中的關係性 43 第三節 居家安寧照顧中的家屋空間 49 第四節 居家安寧的特殊性 51 第六章 結語 53 第一節 臨床貢獻與建議 54 第二節 研究限制與未來方向 55 參考文獻 57 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 現象學心理學 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 居家安寧 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 家屬照顧者 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 居家照顧經驗 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | family caregiver | en |
| dc.subject | home care experience | en |
| dc.subject | phenomenological psychology | en |
| dc.subject | Home-based hospice care | en |
| dc.title | 居家安寧照顧中的家：家屬照顧者之照顧處境經驗探究 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The meaning of “home”: Exploring the situational experiences of home-based hospice family caregivers | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 110-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 鄭致道(Chih-Tao Cheng),李宛霖(Wan-Lin Lee) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 居家安寧,家屬照顧者,居家照顧經驗,現象學心理學, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Home-based hospice care,family caregiver,home care experience,phenomenological psychology, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 65 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202201475 | |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2022-07-18 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 心理學研究所 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2025-06-30 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 心理學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| U0001-1507202210041400.pdf | 2.44 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。