請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/8534
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 張弘潔(Hung-Chieh Chang) | |
dc.contributor.author | Ze-Ming Yao | en |
dc.contributor.author | 姚澤銘 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-20T00:56:50Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-02-22 | |
dc.date.available | 2021-05-20T00:56:50Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2021-02-22 | |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2021-01-29 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 一、英文文獻
Achakulwisut, P., Brauer, M., Hystad, P., Anenberg, S. C. (2019). Global, national, and urban burdens of paediatric asthma incidence attributable to ambient NO2 pollution: estimates from global datasets. The Lancet Planetary Health, 3(4), e166-e178. Anderson, J. O., et al. (2012). 'Clearing the Air: A Review of the Effects of Particulate Matter Air Pollution on Human Health.' Journal of Medical Toxicology 8(2): 166-175. Bereday, G. Z. F. (1964). Comparative method in education, Holt, Rinehart and Winston. Calderón-Garcidueñas, L., Torres-Jardón, R., Kulesza, R. J., Park, S. B., D’Angiulli, A. (2014). Air pollution and detrimental effects on children’s brain. The need for a multidisciplinary approach to the issue complexity and challenges. Frontiers in human neuroscience, 8, 613. Chiang, T.-Y., et al. (2016). Increased incidence of allergic rhinitis, bronchitis and asthma, in children living near a petrochemical complex with SO2 pollution. Environment International 96: 1-7. Cifuentes, E., Trasande, L., Ramirez, M., Landrigan, P. J. (2010). A qualitative analysis of environmental policy and children's health in Mexico. Environmental Health, 9(1), 14. Commission for Environmental Cooperation(2019). Children's Health and the Environment in North America. Retrieved from http://www3.cec.org/islandora/en/item/2272-childrens-health-and-environment-in-north-america-en.pdf Dockery, D. W., Pope, C. A., Xu, X., Spengler, J. D., Ware, J. H., Fay, M. E., ... Speizer, F. E. (1993). An association between air pollution and mortality in six US cities. New England journal of medicine, 329(24), 1753-1759. Ferris Jr, B. G. (1978). Health effects of exposure to low levels of regulated air pollutants: a critical review. Journal of the Air Pollution Control Association, 28(5), 482-497. Gauderman, W. J., Avol, E., Gilliland, F., Vora, H., Thomas, D., Berhane, K., ... Margolis, H. (2004). The effect of air pollution on lung development from 10 to 18 years of age. New England Journal of Medicine, 351(11), 1057-1067. Guo, Y. L., Lin, Y. C., Sung, F. C., Huang, S. L., Ko, Y. C., Lai, J. S., ... Dockery, D. W. (1999). Climate, traffic-related air pollutants, and asthma prevalence in middle-school children in taiwan. Environmental health perspectives, 107(12), 1001-1006. Goldman, L. R. (1995). Children--unique and vulnerable. Environmental risks facing children and recommendations for response. Environmental Health Perspectives, 103(suppl 6), 13-18. Huang, P. C., Liu, L. H., Shie, R. H., Tsai, C. H., Liang, W. Y., Wang, C. W., ... Chan, C. C. (2016). Assessment of urinary thiodiglycolic acid exposure in school-aged children in the vicinity of a petrochemical complex in central Taiwan. Environmental research, 150, 566-572. Landrigan, P. J., Carlson, J. E. (1995). Environmental policy and children's health. The Future of Children, 34-52. Landrigan, P. J., Goldman, L. R. (2011). Children’s vulnerability to toxic chemicals: a challenge and opportunity to strengthen health and environmental policy. Health Affairs, 30(5), 842-850. Landrigan, P. J. (2016). 'Children's Environmental Health: A Brief History.' Academic Pediatrics 16(1): 1-9. Lee, Y. L., Shaw, C. K., Su, H. J., Lai, J. S., Ko, Y. C., Huang, S. L., ... Guo, Y. L. (2003). Climate, traffic-related air pollutants and allergic rhinitis prevalence in middle-school children in Taiwan. European Respiratory Journal, 21(6), 964-970. Lee, Y. L., Su, H. J., Sheu, H. M., Yu, H. S., Guo, Y. L. (2008). Traffic-related air pollution, climate, and prevalence of eczema in Taiwanese school children. Journal of Investigative Dermatology, 128(10), 2412-2420. Lewis-Beck, M. S., Bryman, A., Futing Liao, T. (2004). The SAGE encyclopedia of social science research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc. Lewis, T. C., et al. (2013). 'Air pollution and respiratory symptoms among children with asthma: Vulnerability by corticosteroid use and residence area.' Science of The Total Environment, 448, 48-55. McConnell, R., Berhane, K., Gilliland, F., London, S. J., Vora, H., Avol, E., ... Peters, J. M. (1999). Air pollution and bronchitic symptoms in Southern California children with asthma. Environmental health perspectives, 107(9), 757-760. McConnell, R., Islam, T., Shankardass, K., Jerrett, M., Lurmann, F., Gilliland, F., ... Peters, J. (2010). Childhood incident asthma and traffic-related air pollution at home and school. Environmental health perspectives, 118(7), 1021-1026. National Research Council. (1993). Pesticides in the Diets of Infants and Children. National Academies Press. OHCHR (2020). Retrieved from: https://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/15/TreatyBodyExternal/countries.aspx?CountryCode=KOR Lang=EN Ragin, C. C. (1987). The comparative method: moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies (No. 303.1). University of California Press. Spady, D., Soskolne, C., Buka, I., Ries, N., Ladd, B., Osornio-Vargas, A., ... Bertollilni, R. (2006). Protecting Children's Environmental Health: Are There Any Governance Instruments?. Epidemiology, 17(6), S165-S166. Spady, D., Ries, N., Ladd, B. D., Buka, I., Osornio-Vargas, A. R., Soskolne, C. L. (2008). Governance Instruments That Protect Children's Environmental Health: Is Enough Being Done?. Environmental Law Review, 10(3), 200-217. Schwartz, J. (2004). Air pollution and children’s health. Pediatrics, 113(Supplement 3), 1037-1043. UNICEF (1989). Convention on the Rights of the Child. UNICEF (2013).General comment No. 15 (2013) on the right of the child to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of health (art. 24). Retrieved from https://www.cylaw.org.tw/about/crc/28/146 UNICEF (2019). History of child rights. Retrieved from https://www.unicef.org/child-rights-convention/history-child-rights UNCRC (2019). List of issues in relation to the combined fifth and sixth periodic reports of the Republic of Korea. Retrieved from https://documents-dds- ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/G19/243/31/PDF/G1924331.pdf?OpenElement U.S. (1997). Executive Order No. 13045, Protection of Children From Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. Retrieved from https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/WCPD-1997-04-28/pdf/WCPD-1997-04-28-Pg563-2.pdf U.S.(1999). The Children's Environmental Health Protection Act, Senate Bill 25 (SB 25). Retrieved from https://ww3.arb.ca.gov/ch/programs/sb25/sb25_text.pdf Vanos, J. K. (2015). Children's health and vulnerability in outdoor microclimates: A comprehensive review. Environment International, 76, 1-15. World Health Organization. (2005). Effects of air pollution on children's health and development: a review of the evidence (No. EUR/05/5046027). Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe. World Health Organization. (2006). WHO Air quality guidelines for particulate matter, ozone, nitrogen dioxide and sulfur dioxide: global update 2005: summary of risk assessment (No.WHO/SDE/PHE/OEH/06.02). Geneva: World Health Organization. World Health Organization. (2017). Evolution of WHO air quality guidelines: past, present and future. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe, 39. World Health Organization. (2018). Air Pollution and Child Health: Prescribing Clean Air. 二、中文文獻 徐金芬(1990)。比較與國際圖書館學研究方法之探討。圖書館學與資訊科學, 16(1)。 謝文全(1995)。比較教育行政。台北:五南圖書。 單美惠(2004)。精神衛生法之國際比較研究-以台灣, 日本及英國為例. 臺灣大學衛生政策與管理研究所學位論文, (2004年)。 楊思偉(2007)。比較教育。台北:心理。 周祝瑛(2008)。《比較教育研究:方法與途徑》之評介 。當代教育研究季刊,16(1),155-165。 高玉泉、蔡沛倫(2016)。兒童權利公約逐條要義。衛生福利部社會及家庭署。 王乙婷(2014)。兩岸身心障礙教育政策比較研究。國立屏東教育大學教育行政研究所博士論文,屏東縣。 取自:https://hdl.handle.net/11296/fbqp8p 余紅柑(2010)。認識兒童人權。取自: http://www.worldcitizens.org.tw/awc2010/ch/F/F_d_page.php?pid=10473 劉宗勇(2011)。專題:永續環境 黃金十年。環保政策月刊,14(12),3。 施慧玲、廖宗聖、陳竹上 (2014)。推動聯合國兒童權利公約國內法化。取自:https://crc.sfaa.gov.tw/download_file.php?f=WxkVnhPJUk90pbir_LBSsrJ1ww3qMPfjPbsToo24xW1uzDKuzMzI9no_hRG_pH7FlfWVSVKQtch0Havk_toLMQ 沈穎、方澤沛、汪禧年、李聯雄、李俊璋(2015)。氯乙烯暴露勞工尿中代謝物(TDGA)分析方法建立及現場驗證. 勞動及職業安全衛生研究季刊 , 23 (1), 25-35. 杜文苓、張景儀(2016)。久聞不知其毒:台灣空污治理的挑戰。取自:http://rsprc.ntu.edu.tw/zh-tw/m07/workingpaper2016/331-2016workingpaper-du#download 杜文苓、周桂田、王瑞庚(2017)。臺灣空氣污染之風險治理與制度研究。 取自: https://rsprc.ntu.edu.tw/images/phocadownload/2017workingpaper/2017_tw_air_institution.pdf 廖宗聖(2017)。兒童權利公約的起源、精神、內容 及國內法規檢視。取自:http://socbu.kcg.gov.tw/download_file.php?file_dir=wf_content_file file_link=WFC_01195_5_20170421_jFz6K.pdf url_file_name=106%E5%B9%B4%E5%85%92%E7%AB%A5%E6%AC%8A%E5%88%A9%E5%85%AC%E7%B4%84-%E5%85%92%E7%AB%A5%E6%AC%8A%E5%88%A9%E5%85%AC%E7%B4%84_%E8%B5%B7%E6%BA%90_%E7%B2%BE%E7%A5%9E%E5%8F%8A%E5%85%A7%E5%AE%B901.pdf 陳文姿(2017)。2150億救空污,林全拍版2019年PM2.5降18%。環境資訊中心。 周桂田、杜文苓、王瑞庚(2018)。臺灣空氣品質治理展望。取自: https://rsprc.ntu.edu.tw/fordownload/10701/0117/2018working%20Paper.pdf 謝明瑞、周信佑(2019)。台灣空污問題與防治政策。取自:https://www.npf.org.tw/2/18414 葉肅科、周海娟(2017)。兒童權利公約之後:臺灣兒少福利發展。社區發展季刊,157 ,54-68 高玉泉 (2018)。兒童權利公約施行與特色。 中華民國兒童保健雜誌, 23(3), 2-7。 環保署(2015)。清淨空氣行動計劃(104年至109年)。取自: http://www.igreentech.url.tw/data/documents/CleanAir_2015_2020.pdf 環保署(2016)。室內空氣品質維護管理計畫文件撰寫指引。 環保署(2017)。「14+N空氣污染防制策略對焦討論會」會議簡報。 環保署(2018)。107年空氣品質監測年報。 環保署(2019)。署長於立法院第九屆第七會期口頭業務報告。取自:https://www.epa.gov.tw/DisplayFile.aspx?FileID=C5C84552546C3972 P=83d24276-7419-4a67-b5b4-09d52fd4e8b4 環保署(2019b)。移動性污染源管制。取自:https://air.epa.gov.tw/EnvTopics/MobilSource.aspx 教育部(2018)。校園空氣品質警示及防護計畫。 衛生福利部(2019a)。CRC優先檢視法規清單-108年第1季。取自:https://crc.sfaa.gov.tw/crc_front/index.php?action=content uuid=42bf058e-aab1-47ca-a148-ff8bf39464bb 衛生福利部(2019b)。兒童權利公約大事記。取自:https://crc.sfaa.gov.tw/crc_front/index.php?action=content uuid=69b84170-899e-46f4-a7e2-c84724414216 衛生福利部(2019c)。全面檢視法規清單-法律案、命令案、行政措施案-108年第1季。取自:https://crc.sfaa.gov.tw/crc_front/index.php?action=content uuid=d8673b98-95b1-4032-98fc-333d96e6fead 空氣污染防制法(民107年8月1日) 空氣污染防制法施行細則(民92年7月23日) 空氣品質標準(民101年5月14日) 室內空氣品質管理法(民100年11月23日) 室內空氣品質標準(民101年11月23日) 應符合室內空氣品質管理法之第一批公告場所(民103年1月23日) 應符合室內空氣品質管理法之第二批公告場所(民106年1月11日) 空氣品質嚴重惡化緊急防制辦法(民106年6月9日) 高級中等以下學校及幼兒園因應空氣品質惡化處理措施暨緊急應變作業流程(民106年7月3日) 三、韓文(法規)文獻 환경정책기본법시행령 [시행2019.7.2.],2019.07.12 대기환경보전법 [시행2020.4.3.],2019.04.02 대기환경보전법 시행령 [시행2019.7.16.],2019.07.16 대기환경보전법 시행규칙 [시행2019.7.16.],2019.07.16 실내공기질 관리법 [시행2020.4.3],2019.04.02 실내공기질 관리법 시행령 [시행2018.10.18] ,2018.10.16 실내공기질 관리법 시행규칙 [시행2019.7.1.],2018.10.18 학교보건법 [시행2019.10.24.],2019.04.23 학교보건법 시행규칙 [시행2019.9.17.], 2019.09.17 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/8534 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 「兒童權利公約」是保障全球兒童權利的重要國際公約。2014年11月20日,台灣正式實施「兒童權利公約施行法」,在法律層級宣示對現行法規進行檢修,使其能進一步保障兒童之各項權利。然當前學術界以「兒童權利公約」之兒童權利觀點探討空污防制法規政策之研究較為缺乏。
本研究以「兒童權利公約」之健康權觀點出發,通過比較研究法(Comparative Method),從戶外空污防制、室內空氣品質管理、空污惡化之緊急應對、空污校園防護等四個構面,比較探討台韓空污防制政策內容。 本研究的主要發現有: (1)韓國現行之戶外空品標準,大部分之空污指標物之標準更為嚴格;(2)韓國之室內空污法規近年修法,明確承諾為兒童等易感性族群提供更高標準之保護措施;在現行室內空品標準中,韓國大部分之空污指標物之標準亦較台灣更為嚴格,且針對學童額外訂立更高標準之校園室內空品標準;在現行室內空污監(檢)測措施中,台灣尚未將兒童使用之校園場所列管,使得現行室內空氣品質管理法之保護措施對校園場所無法適用;而韓國之室內空品定期檢測中,校園場所之監測頻率較其他場所更高。 (3)台韓空污惡化之緊急應對措施大致相同,惟措施之啟動標準有所差異,整體而言韓國之標準更為嚴格;(4)韓國近年新增了一些針對兒童的額外保護措施(包括:教室安裝空污監測及淨化設備等)並明確寫入空污法規中。 本研究之政策建議:(1)台灣政府可參考韓國從校園防護入手,於「學校衛生法」為兒童族群額外制定更嚴格的空品標準;(2)盡快將校園場所納入室內空品管理;(3)降低校園空污惡化緊急應對措施之啟動門檻;(4)採行更積極的校園空污防護措施(如:韓國安裝空氣淨化及室內空污監測設施);(5)在空污防制法規中認知兒童健康之「易感性」,並承諾加強對兒童健康保護(財務、人力、行政等方面)之支持,上述內容寫入空污防制法規中。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | The 'Convention on the Rights of the Child' is the most important international convention guaranteeing the rights of children worldwide. Therefore, Taiwan formally implemented the 'Implementation Act of the Convention on the Rights of the Child' on November 20, 2014, making a declaration at the legal aspect that the government’s responsibility to amend the current law/regulations for ensuring the rights of children is under protection. However, the current academic community lacks focus on discussing air pollution regulations and policies from the perspective of children ’s rights under the Convention on the Rights of the Child.
Through the Comparative Method, this research tries to examine and compare the four aspects of ambient air pollution control, indoor air quality management, emergency responsive measures to air pollution deterioration, and school protection measures related to air pollution between Taiwan and South Korea, based on the perspective of children ’s health rights of the Convention on the Rights of the Child. The main findings of this study include: (1) Most standard values of ambient air pollution indicators in South Korea are more stringent; (2) In indoor air quality management related policies: a. South Korea officially promises to provide higher standards of health protection measures to children in the law; b. Most indoor air pollution indicators standard in South Korea are also stringent than Taiwan, and the school indoor air quality standards for children even much better; c. Taiwan has not yet regulated kindergarten and school which are highly relevant to children ’s use, making the protection measures of the current indoor air quality management law unavailable for school-related places; The frequency of regular indoor air quality inspections for school is higher than other places in South Korea, (3) The emergency response measures for the deterioration of air pollution in Taiwan and South Korea are almost the same, but the standards for starting the measures are different. Overall, the standards in South Korea are stricter. (4) In recent years, South Korea has implemented special measures for the protection of children (including installation of air pollution monitoring equipment, air purification equipment in the classroom) and clearly written into the air pollution regulation/law. According to the findings of this study, the following policy recommendations are proposed: (1) The Taiwanese government can follow the example of South Korea to start with school protection, and in the 'School Health Act', individually set stricter standards for children; (2) School-related places should be included in indoor air quality management as soon as possible; (3) The starting standards of the current emergency response measures for the deterioration of air pollution should be reconsidered; (4) Take more active air pollution protection measures in school (for example South Korea installs air purification and indoor air pollution monitoring facilities); (5) The 'vulnerabilities' of children's health should be recognized in the air pollution control policies, and provide technical, administrative and financial support to enhance children's health protection. And the above content should be written in the air pollution control policies document. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-20T00:56:50Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 U0001-2901202103114300.pdf: 3382420 bytes, checksum: 55c8fbab6dbf0105d49bfc1a8c2ebbdc (MD5) Previous issue date: 2021 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書 i 誌謝 ii 中文摘要 vi Abstract v 目錄 vii 表目錄 viii 圖目錄 x 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的 2 第三節 研究重要性 3 第二章 文獻探討 4 第一節 兒童權利公約 4 第二節 全球空污中的兒童 11 第三節 國內外空污政策與兒童健康保護 13 第四節 被忽略的兒童獨特環境風險—「易感性」 17 第三章 研究方法 22 第一節 研究方法 22 第二節 研究流程 24 第三節 選取之研究資料 25 第四節 資料處理 27 第四章 研究結果 28 第一節 台灣空污防制政策之兒童健康保護分析 28 第二節 韓國空污防制政策之兒童健康保護分析 52 第三節 台韓空污防制政策之兒童健康保護比較 76 第五章 研究討論 89 第一節 以「兒童權利公約」之健康權探討當前台韓空污防制政策 89 第二節 以「易感性」觀點審視台韓空污防制政策之兒童健康保護 92 第三節 研究限制 96 第六章 結論與建議 97 第一節 結論 97 第二節 建議 99 參考文獻 100 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 從兒童權利觀點比較台灣與韓國之空氣污染防制政策 | zh_TW |
dc.title | A Comparison of Air Pollution Control Policy in Taiwan and South Korea from the Perspective of UNCRC | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 109-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.author-orcid | 0000-0003-0418-2377 | |
dc.contributor.advisor-orcid | 張弘潔(0000-0002-2332-3617) | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 鍾國彪(Kuo-Piao Chung),江東亮(Tung-Liang Chiang) | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee-orcid | 鍾國彪(0000-0001-9482-7065),江東亮(0000-0002-7876-3943) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 兒童權利公約,空污防制政策,比較研究,易感性,空污校園防護, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | UNCRC,Air pollution control policy,Comparative study,Vulnerability,School protection against air pollution, | en |
dc.relation.page | 108 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202100244 | |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
dc.date.accepted | 2021-01-29 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 公共衛生學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 健康政策與管理研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 健康政策與管理研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
U0001-2901202103114300.pdf | 3.3 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。