Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 管理學院
  3. 財務金融學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/85335
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor陳業寧(Yeh-Ning Chen)
dc.contributor.authorYu-hsin Chienen
dc.contributor.author簡鈺欣zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-19T22:58:26Z-
dc.date.copyright2022-08-12
dc.date.issued2022
dc.date.submitted2022-07-27
dc.identifier.citation1.池祥萱, 繆文娟, & 莊瀅臻. (2014). 企業社會責任對於公司財務績效之影響是雙面刃嗎? 來自全球 500 大公司的證據. 管理學報, 31(1), 1-19. 2.池祥麟. (2017). 企業社會責任-行為財務學的觀點. 證券市場發展季刊, 29(4), 63-104. 3.李元傑. (2015). 企業社會責任揭露及企業未來績效, 分析師預期, 及資金成本之關聯. 4.杜榮瑞, 陳煬楊, & 黃馨儀. (2019). 企業社會責任績效與 CEO 薪酬的關係. 當代會計, 20(1), 1-28. 5.林思秀. (2020). 以公司治理角度探討研發活動對企業價值之影響. 6.陳育成, 許峰睿, & 黃聖雯. (2013). 企業社會責任與經營績效之關聯性研究. 評價學報, (6), 53-72 7.黃瓊瑤, 方世榮, & 陳育成. (2012). 家族控制與企業社會責任績效之關聯性. 中山管理評論, 20(2), 673-711. 8.張淑清, & 呂欣樺. (2015). 研發支出與管理團隊特性對公司績效之影響. 會計學報, 6(1), 1-34. 9.詹場, 柯文乾, & 池祥麟. (2016). CSR 能為公司經營策略帶來什麼好處? 一來自世界頂級學術期刊之證據. 商略學報, 8(2), 77-86. 10.廖芝嫻 & 連晨帆. (2015). 前瞻性研究發展費用揭露的影響因素與市場反應. 臺大管理論叢 26, no. 1, 209-254. 11.甄友薇. (2015). 企業社會責任報告書揭露品質之決定因素及其與公司績效之關聯性. 12.劉昀庭. (2017). 公司治理對於企業社會責任績效及報告書確信之影響-以臺灣上市公司為例. 13.藍麗琪. (2008). 企業社會責任與財務績效-台灣花旗與玉山金控個案比較分析. 14.簡良恩. (2017). 企業社會責任對現金持有及現金價值之影響. 15.聶建中, 林彩梅, & 姜健. (2017). 企業社會責任之於公司經營績效受企業規模大小不同之變化影響. 多國籍企業管理評論, 11(1), 39-58. 1.Blue ocean strategy, W.C. Kim and R. Maubourgne, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA (2005) 2.Akben-Selcuk, E. (2019). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: The moderating role of ownership concentration in Turkey. Sustainability, 11(13), 3643. 3.Atanassov, J., Nanda, V. K., & Seru, A. (2007). Finance and innovation: The case of publicly traded firms. Ross School of Business Paper, (970). 4.Aupperle, K. E., & Van Pham, D. (1989). An expanded investigation into the relationship of corporate social responsibility and financial performance. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 2(4), 263-274. 5.Bacinello, E., Tontini, G., & Alberton, A. (2020). Influence of maturity on corporate social responsibility and sustainable innovation in business performance. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(2), 749-759. 6.Barnea, A., & Rubin, A. (2010). Corporate social responsibility as a conflict between shareholders. Journal of business ethics, 97(1), 71-86. 7.Bhandari, A., & Javakhadze, D. (2017). Corporate social responsibility and capital allocation efficiency. Journal of Corporate Finance, 43, 354-377. 8.Branco, M. C., & Rodrigues, L. L. (2006). Corporate social responsibility and resource-based perspectives. Journal of business Ethics, 69(2), 111-132. 9.Brin, P. V., & Nehme, M. N. (2019). Corporate social responsibility: analysis of theories and models. 10.Cheng, H., Hong, H., & Shue, K. (2013). Do managers do good with other people's money? (No. w19432). National Bureau of Economic Research. 11.Cheng, B., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). Corporate social responsibility and access to finance. Strategic management journal, 35(1), 1-23. 12.Chintrakarn, P., Jiraporn, P., Jiraporn, N., & Davidson, T. (2017). Estimating the effect of corporate social responsibility on firm value using geographic identification. Asia‐Pacific Journal of Financial Studies, 46(2), 276-304. 13.Edmans, A. (2011). Does the stock market fully value intangibles? Employee satisfaction and equity prices. Journal of Financial economics, 101(3), 621-640. 14.Harjoto, M. A., & Jo, H. (2015). Legal vs. normative CSR: Differential impact on analyst dispersion, stock return volatility, cost of capital, and firm value. Journal of Business Ethics, 128(1), 1-20. 15.Halme, M., & Laurila, J. (2009). Philanthropy, integration or innovation? Exploring the financial and societal outcomes of different types of corporate responsibility. Journal of business ethics, 84(3), 325-339. 16.Hillman, A. J., & Keim, G. D. (2001). Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: what's the bottom line?. Strategic management journal, 22(2), 125-139. 17.Hirshleifer, D., Hsu, P. H., & Li, D. (2013). Innovative efficiency and stock returns. Journal of financial economics, 107(3), 632-654. 18.Hirshleifer, D., Low, A., & Teoh, S. H. (2012). Are overconfident CEOs better innovators?. The journal of finance, 67(4), 1457-1498. 19.Jamali, D. (2008). A stakeholder approach to corporate social responsibility: A fresh perspective into theory and practice. Journal of business ethics, 82(1), 213-231. 20.Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of financial economics, 3(4), 305-360. 21.Jiraporn, P., Jiraporn, N., Boeprasert, A., & Chang, K. (2014). Does corporate social responsibility (CSR) improve credit ratings? Evidence from geographic identification. Financial Management, 43(3), 505-531. 22.Jo, H., & Harjoto, M. A. (2012). The causal effect of corporate governance on corporate social responsibility. Journal of business ethics, 106(1), 53-72. 23.John, K., Lee, J., & Oh, J. Y. J. (2018, April). The information value of corporate social responsibility. In Proceedings of Paris December 2019 Finance Meeting EUROFIDAI-ESSEC. 24.John, K., Lee, J., & Oh, J. Y. J. (2018, April). The information value of corporate social responsibility. In Proceedings of Paris December 2019 Finance Meeting EUROFIDAI-ESSEC. 25.Kim, K. H., Kim, M., & Qian, C. (2018). Effects of corporate social responsibility on corporate financial performance: A competitive-action perspective. Journal of management, 44(3), 1097-1118. 26.Lee, M. D. P. (2008). A review of the theories of corporate social responsibility: Its evolutionary path and the road ahead. International journal of management reviews, 10(1), 53-73. 27.Li, Z., Liao, G., & Albitar, K. (2020). Does corporate environmental responsibility engagement affect firm value? The mediating role of corporate innovation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(3), 1045-1055. 28.Lins, K. V., Servaes, H., & Tamayo, A. (2017). Social capital, trust, and firm performance: The value of corporate social responsibility during the financial crisis. the Journal of Finance, 72(4), 1785-1824. 29.Long, W. F., & Ravenscraft, D. J. (1993). LBOs, debt and R&D intensity. Strategic management journal, 14(S1), 119-135. 30.Marin, L., Martín, P. J., & Rubio, A. (2017). Doing good and different! The mediation effect of innovation and investment on the influence of CSR on competitiveness. Corporate social responsibility and environmental management, 24(2), 159-171. 31.Martin, R. L. (2002). The virtue matrix: Calculating the return on corporate responsibility. Harvard business review, 80(3), 68-75. 32.Masulis, R. W., & Reza, S. W. (2015). Agency problems of corporate philanthropy. The Review of Financial Studies, 28(2), 592-636. 33.Mishra, D. R. (2017). Post-innovation CSR performance and firm value. Journal of business ethics, 140(2), 285-306. 34.Nguyen, V. H., Agbola, F. W., & Choi, B. (2019). Does corporate social responsibility reduce information asymmetry? Empirical evidence from Australia. Australian Journal of Management, 44(2), 188-211. 35.Petrenko, O. V., Aime, F., Ridge, J., & Hill, A. (2016). Corporate social responsibility or CEO narcissism? CSR motivations and organizational performance. Strategic Management Journal, 37(2), 262-279. 36.Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard business review, 84(12), 78-92. 37.Rosenbusch, N., Brinckmann, J., & Bausch, A. (2011). Is innovation always beneficial? A meta-analysis of the relationship between innovation and performance in SMEs. Journal of business Venturing, 26(4), 441-457. 38.Russo, A., & Perrini, F. (2010). Investigating stakeholder theory and social capital: CSR in large firms and SMEs. Journal of Business ethics, 91(2), 207-221. 39.Shen, R., Tang, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2016). Does Firm Innovation Affect Corporate Social Responsibility?. 40.Shiu, Y. M., & Yang, S. L. (2017). Does engagement in corporate social responsibility provide strategic insurance‐like effects?. Strategic Management Journal, 38(2), 455-470. 41.Surroca, J. A., Aguilera, R. V., Desender, K., & Tribo, J. A. (2020). Is managerial entrenchment always bad and corporate social responsibility always good? A cross‐national examination of their combined influence on shareholder value. Strategic Management Journal, 41(5), 891-920. 42.Tian, Q., Zhang, S., Yu, H., & Cao, G. (2019). Exploring the factors influencing business model innovation using grounded theory: The case of a Chinese high-end equipment manufacturer. Sustainability, 11(5), 1455. 43.Wu, W., Liu, Y., Chin, T., & Zhu, W. (2018). Will green CSR enhance innovation? A perspective of public visibility and firm transparency. International journal of environmental research and public health, 15(2), 268. 44.Villalonga, B. (2004). Intangible resources, Tobin’sq, and sustainability of performance differences. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 54(2), 205-230. 45.Vogel, D. (2007). The market for virtue: The potential and limits of corporate social responsibility. Brookings Institution Press.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/85335-
dc.description.abstract本研究以2010年至2018年台灣上市櫃電子業企業為樣本,分析企業社會責任 (Corporate Social Responsibility, CSR) 表現對於企業創新活動邊際效益之影響。由最小平方法 (Ordinary Least Squares, OLS) 迴歸分析的實證結果,企業社會責任績效較佳之企業,其創新投入及創新產出與市場價值之正向關係較弱,顯示當企業分配較多資源於社會責任活動時,可能因為代理問題等因素,造成內部資源配置不當,最終導致其創新邊際效益較社會責任表現不佳之企業為低。 本研究OLS分析的實證結果也發現:就創新投入與企業績效之關係來看,成長機會較佳及創新效率較高之企業的CSR對於創新投入之邊際效益有較大的減損;而就創新產出與企業績效之關係來看,屬於研發密度前五大產業、營運表現佳、以及董事長持股較高之企業的CSR對於創新產出之邊際效益有較大的減損。 本研究也進行兩階段 (Two-stage Least Squares, 2SLS) 迴歸分析,以控制CSR績效可能為內生 (Endogenous) 變數的問題。實證結果顯示,控制內生性問題後,上述負向關係大多轉為不顯著,顯示OLS迴歸的結果可能高估CSR對創新活動邊際效益之負面影響。但對於創新效率較高的子樣本來說,在2SLS迴歸分析中CSR對於創新邊際效益之影響仍為負向顯著,這代表對於科技產業中創新重要性高之企業而言,CSR對企業創新有顯著的不利影響。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractUsing the data of publicly traded firms in the electronic industry in Taiwan from 2010 to 2018, this thesis examines the impact of corporate social responsibility (CSR) on the marginal values of corporate innovation inputs (measured by research and development expenses) and outputs (measured by the numbers of patents and citations). The empirical results from the ordinary least squares (OLS) regressions show that CSR performance reduces the positive effect of innovation activities on firms’ market values, implying that the marginal benefits of innovation activities decline when corporations contribute more resources to CSR. A possible explanation for these results is that they are driven by poor resource allocation due to agency problems. The results from the OLS analysis also show that CSR is more detrimental to the marginal benefits of innovation inputs for firms with higher growth opportunities or higher innovation efficiency. In addition, for firms in industries with higher research and development intensity, with higher ROA, or whose chairperson has higher equity ownership, CSR negatively impacts the relationship between innovative outputs and corporate performance. To control for the potential problem that a firm’s CSR performance may be endogenously determined, this thesis also conducts a two-stage least squares (2SLS) analysis. It finds that many of the results become insignificant after the endogeneity issue is considered, suggesting that the results from the OLS regressions may overestimate the negative effects of CSR on the marginal benefits of innovation. Nonetheless, for the subsample with higher innovative efficiency, the results of the 2SLS analysis still show that firms’ marginal benefits of innovation become significantly lower when they have better CSR performance, implying that CSR does reduce the marginal value of innovation under certain circumstances.en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2023-03-19T22:58:26Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
U0001-1407202221080000.pdf: 1750316 bytes, checksum: 8b0c49adb3f556710ad8ed4acfafe5c3 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2022
en
dc.description.tableofcontents第壹章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的 2 第貳章 文獻回顧與假說建立 4 第一節 創新之衡量及與市場價值之關聯性 4 第二節 企業社會責任之衡量及與市場價值之關聯性 5 第參章 研究方法 9 第一節 企業社會責任衡量 9 第二節 實證模型 11 第三節 變數定義與衡量 13 第四節 樣本選取與資料來源 16 第肆章 實證結果與分析 18 第一節 樣本敘述 18 第二節 各變數敘述統計量 19 第三節 企業社會責任對創新活動邊際效益影響分析 22 第四節 穩健性測試 30 第伍章 研究結論、限制與建議 38 第一節 研究結論與貢獻 38 第二節 研究限制與建議 39 參考文獻 41 附錄 46
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.subject企業市場價值zh_TW
dc.subject創新zh_TW
dc.subject企業社會責任zh_TW
dc.subjectInnovationen
dc.subjectMarket Valueen
dc.subjectCorporate Social Responsibilityen
dc.title企業社會責任對於創新與績效關係之探討 - 以台灣上市櫃電子業為例zh_TW
dc.titleThe Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Innovation and Performance - An Empirical Study of the Electronic Firms in Taiwanen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear110-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee陳彥行(Yan-Shing Chen),陳韋達(Wei-Da Chen)
dc.subject.keyword企業社會責任,創新,企業市場價值,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordCorporate Social Responsibility,Innovation,Market Value,en
dc.relation.page54
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU202201472
dc.rights.note同意授權(限校園內公開)
dc.date.accepted2022-07-27
dc.contributor.author-college管理學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept財務金融學研究所zh_TW
dc.date.embargo-lift2022-08-12-
顯示於系所單位:財務金融學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
U0001-1407202221080000.pdf
授權僅限NTU校內IP使用(校園外請利用VPN校外連線服務)
1.71 MBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved