Skip navigation

DSpace JSPUI

DSpace preserves and enables easy and open access to all types of digital content including text, images, moving images, mpegs and data sets

Learn More
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Publication Year
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Advisor
  • Search TDR
  • Rights Q&A
    • My Page
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 工學院
  3. 機械工程學系
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/85233
Full metadata record
???org.dspace.app.webui.jsptag.ItemTag.dcfield???ValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor楊鏡堂zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorJing-Tang Yangen
dc.contributor.author林有駿zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorYou-Jun Linen
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-19T22:51:54Z-
dc.date.available2023-09-01-
dc.date.copyright2022-08-05-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.date.submitted2002-01-01-
dc.identifier.citationAddo-Akoto, R., Han, J. S., & Han, J. H. (2021). Roles of wing flexibility and kinematics in flapping wing aerodynamics. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 104, 103317.
Anderson Jr J. D. 2010. Fundamentals of Aerodynamics. New York, USA: Tata McGraw-Hill Education Press.
Aono, H., Shyy, W., & Liu, H. (2009). Near wake vortex dynamics of a hovering hawkmoth. Acta Mechanica Sinica, 25(1), 23-36.
Betts C., & Wootton R. (1988). Wing shape and flight behaviour in butterflies (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea and Hesperioidea): A preliminary analysis. Journal of Experimental Biology, 138(1), 271-288.
Birch, J. M., & Dickinson, M. H. (2001). Spanwise flow and the attachment of the leading-edge vortex on insect wings. Nature, 412(6848), 729-733.
Birch, J. M., & Dickinson, M. H. (2003). The influence of wing–wake interactions on the production of aerodynamic forces in flapping flight. Journal of Experimental Biology, 206(13), 2257-2272.
Bluman, J. E., Sridhar, M. K., & Kang, C. K. (2018). Chordwise wing flexibility may passively stabilize hovering insects. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 15(147), 20180409.
Bode-Oke, A. T., & Dong, H. (2020). The reverse flight of a monarch butterfly (Danaus plexippus) is characterized by a weight-supporting upstroke and postural changes. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 17(167), 20200268.
Bode-Oke, A. T., Zeyghami, S., & Dong, H. (2018). Flying in reverse: kinematics and aerodynamics of a dragonfly in backward free flight. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 15(143), 20180102.
Bomphrey, R. J., Nakata, T., Phillips, N., & Walker, S. M. (2017). Smart wing rotation and trailing-edge vortices enable high frequency mosquito flight. Nature, 544(7648), 92-95.
Broering, T. M., Lian, Y., & Henshaw, W. (2012). Numerical investigation of energy extraction in a tandem flapping wing configuration. AIAA Journal, 50(11), 2295-2307.
Chakraborty, P., Balachandar, S. & Adrian, R. J. (2005). On the relationships between local vortex identification schemes. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 535, 189-214.
Chang, S. K., Lai, Y. H., Lin, Y. J., & Yang, J. T. (2020). Enhanced lift and thrust via the translational motion between the thorax-abdomen node and the center of mass of a butterfly with a constructive abdominal oscillation. Physical Review E, 102(6), 062407.
Chen, D., Kolomenskiy, D., Nakata, T., & Liu, H. (2017). Forewings match the formation of leading-edge vortices and dominate aerodynamic force production in revolving insect wings. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 13(1), 016009.
Chin, D. D., & Lentink, D. (2016). Flapping wing aerodynamics: from insects to vertebrates. Journal of Experimental Biology, 219(7), 920-932.
Combes, S. A. & Daniel T. L. (2003). Flexural stiffness in insect wings I. Scaling and the influence of wing venation. Journal of Experimental Biology, 206(17), 2979-2987.
Dickinson, M. H., & Gotz, K. G. (1993). Unsteady aerodynamic performance of model wings at low Reynolds numbers. Journal of Experimental Biology, 174(1), 45-64.
Dickinson, M. H., & Muijres, F. T. (2016). The aerodynamics and control of free flight manoeuvres in Drosophila. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 371(1704), 20150388.
Dickinson, M. H., Lehmann, F.-O., & Sane, S. P. (1999). Wing rotation and the aerodynamic basis of insect flight. Science, 284(5422), 1954-1960.
Dudley, R. (1990). Biomechanics of flight in neotropical butterflies: morphometrics and kinematics. Journal of Experimental Biology, 150(1), 37-53.
Dudley, R. (2002). The Biomechanics of Insect Flight: Form, Function, Evolution. New Jersey, USA: Princeton University Press.
Ellington, C. P., Van den Berg, C., Willmott, A. P., & Thomas, A. L. R. (1996). Leading-edge vortices in insect flight. Nature, 384(6610), 626.
Fei, Y. H. J., & Yang, J. T. (2015). Enhanced thrust and speed revealed in the forward flight of a butterfly with transient body translation. Physical Review E, 92(3), 033004.
Fei, Y. H. J., & Yang, J. T. (2016). Importance of body rotation during the flight of a butterfly. Physical Review E, 93(3), 033124.
Fu, J., Liu, X., Shyy, W., & Qiu, H. (2018). Effects of flexibility and aspect ratio on the aerodynamic performance of flapping wings. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 13(3), 036001.
Fuchiwaki, M., Kuroki, T., Tanaka, K., & Tababa, T. (2013). Dynamic behavior of the vortex ring formed on a butterfly wing. Experiments in Fluids, 54(1), 1-12.
Gehrke, A., Richeux, J., Uksul, E., & Mulleners, K. (2022). Aeroelastic characterisation of a bio-inspired flapping membrane wing. arXiv preprint, arXiv:2203.14055.
Haller, G. (2005). An objective definition of a vortex. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 525, 1-26.
Han, J. S., Chang, J. W., & Cho, H. K. (2015). Vortices behavior depending on the aspect ratio of an insect-like flapping wing in hover. Experiments in Fluids, 56(9), 1-16.
Han, J. S., Kim, H. Y., & Han, J. H. (2019). Interactions of the wakes of two flapping wings in hover. Physics of Fluids, 31(2), 021901.
Huang, H., & Sun, M. (2012). Forward flight of a model butterfly: Simulation by equations of motion coupled with the Navier-Stokes equations. Acta Mechanica Sinica, 28(6), 1590-1601.
Hunt, J. C., Wray, A. A., & Moin, P. (1988). Eddies, streams, and convergence zones in turbulent flows. Center for Turbulence Research, Proceeding of the Summer Program, 193–207.
Jafferis, N. T., Helbling, E. F., Karpelson, M., & Wood, R. J. (2019). Untethered flight of an insect-sized flapping-wing microscale aerial vehicle. Nature, 570(7762), 491-495.
Jeong, J. & Hussain, F. (1995). On the identification of a vortex. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 285, 69-94.
Kang, C. K., Aono, H., Cesnik, C. E., & Shyy, W. (2011). Effects of flexibility on the aerodynamic performance of flapping wings. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 689, 32-74.
Kang, C. K., Cranford, J., Sridhar, M. K., Kodali, D., Landrum, D. B., & Slegers, N. (2018). Experimental characterization of a butterfly in climbing flight. AIAA Journal, 56(1), 15-24.
Karásek, M., Muijres, F. T., De Wagter, C., Remes, B. D., & De Croon, G. C. (2018). A tailless aerial robotic flapper reveals that flies use torque coupling in rapid banked turns. Science, 361(6407), 1089-1094.
Koehler, C., Liang, Z., Gaston, Z., Wan, H., & Dong, H. (2012). 3D reconstruction and analysis of wing deformation in free-flying dragonflies. Journal of Experimental Biology, 215(17), 3018-3027.
Kramer, V. M. (1932). Die zunahme des maximalauftriebes von tragflugeln bei plotzlicher anstellwinkelvergrosserung (boeneffekt). Z. Flugtech. Motorluftschiff, 23, 185-189.
Kuethe, A. M. & Chow, C. Y. (1998). Foundations of Aerodynamics: Bases of Aerodynamic Design. New York, USA: Wiley Press.
Lai, Y. H., Lin, Y. J., Chang, S. K., & Yang, J. T. (2020). Effect of wing–wing interaction coupled with morphology and kinematic features of damselflies. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 16(1), 016017.
Lai, Y. H., Lin, Y. J., Chang, S. K., & Yang, J. T. (2020). Effect of wing–wing interaction coupled with morphology and kinematic features of damselflies. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 16(1), 016017.
Lee, Y. J., & Lua, K. B. (2018). Wing–wake interaction: comparison of 2D and 3D flapping wings in hover flight. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 13(6), 066003.
Lehmann, F. O., Gorb, S., Nasir, N., & Schützner, P. (2011). Elastic deformation and energy loss of flapping fly wings. Journal of Experimental Biology, 214(17), 2949-2961.
Lehmann, F. O., Sane, S. P., & Dickinson, M. (2005). The aerodynamic effects of wing–wing interaction in flapping insect wings. Journal of Experimental Biology, 208(16), 3075-3092.
Li, C., & Dong, H. (2017). Wing kinematics measurement and aerodynamics of a dragonfly in turning flight. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 12(2), 026001.
Liang, Z., Dong, H., & Wei, M. (2010, January). Computational analysis of hovering hummingbird flight. In 48th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition (p. 555). Orlando FL, USA..
Lin, T., Zheng, L., Hedrick, T., & Mittal, R. (2012). The significance of moment-of-inertia variation in flight manoeuvres of butterflies. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 7(4), 044002.
Lin, Y. J., Chang, S. K., Lai, Y. H., & Yang, J. T. (2021). Beneficial wake-capture effect for forward propulsion with a restrained wing-pitch motion of a butterfly. Royal Society Open Science, 8(8), 202172.
Liu, H. (2009). Integrated modeling of insect flight: from morphology, kinematics to aerodynamics. Journal of Computational Physics, 228(2), 439-459.
Liu, H., Ravi, S., Kolomenskiy, D., & Tanaka, H. (2016). Biomechanics and biomimetics in insect-inspired flight systems. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 371(1704), 20150390.
Liu, L. G., Du, G., & Sun, M. (2020). Aerodynamic-force production mechanisms in hovering mosquitoes. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 898, A19.
Liu, X., Hefler, C., Fu, J., Shyy, W., & Qiu, H. (2021). Implications of wing pitching and wing shape on the aerodynamics of a dragonfly. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 101, 103208.
Lua, K. B., Lai, K. C., Lim, T. T., & Yeo, K. S. (2010). On the aerodynamic characteristics of hovering rigid and flexible hawkmoth-like wings. Experiments in Fluids, 49(6), 1263-1291.
Lua, K. B., Lee, Y. J., Lim, T. T., & Yeo, K. S. (2017). Wing–wake interaction of three-dimensional flapping wings. AIAA Journal, 55(3), 729-739.
Lua, K. B., Lim, T. T., & Yeo, K. S. (2011). Effect of wing–wake interaction on aerodynamic force generation on a 2D flapping wing. Experiments in Fluids, 51(1), 177-195.
Lua, K. B., Zhang, X. H., Lim, T. T., & Yeo, K. S. (2015). Effects of pitching phase angle and amplitude on a two-dimensional flapping wing in hovering mode. Experiments in Fluids, 56(2), 1-22.
Lugt, H. J. (1983). Vortex Flow in Nature and Technology. New York, USA: Wiley Press.
Luo, G., Du, G., & Sun, M. (2018). Effects of stroke deviation on aerodynamic force production of a flapping wing. AIAA Journal, 56(1), 25-35.
Ma, K. Y., Chirarattananon, P., Fuller, S. B., & Wood, R. J. (2013). Controlled flight of a biologically inspired, insect-scale robot. Science, 340(6132), 603-607.
Madangopal, R., Khan, Z. A., & Agrawal, S. K. (2006). Energetics-based design of small flapping-wing micro air vehicles. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 11(4), 433-438.
Marden, J. H. (1987). Maximum lift production during takeoff in flying animals. Journal of Experimental Biology, 130(1), 235-258.
Marden, J. H., & Chai, P. (1991). Aerial predation and butterfly design: how palatability, mimicry, and the need for evasive flight constrain mass allocation. The American Naturalist, 138(1), 15-36.
Misof, B., et al., (2014). Phylogenomics resolves the timing and pattern of insect evolution. Science, 346(6210), 763-767.
Mountcastle, A. M., & Daniel, T. L. (2009). Aerodynamic and functional consequences of wing compliance. Experiments in Fluids, 46(5), 873-882.
Muijres, F. T., Elzinga, M. J., Melis, J. M., & Dickinson, M. H. (2014). Flies evade looming targets by executing rapid visually directed banked turns. Science, 344(6180), 172-177.
Nakata, T., Liu, H., Tanaka, Y., Nishihashi, N., Wang, X., & Sato, A. (2011). Aerodynamics of a bio-inspired flexible flapping-wing micro air vehicle. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 6(4), 045002.
Nakatani, Y., Suzuki, K., & Inamuro, T. (2016). Flight control simulations of a butterfly-like flapping wing–body model by the immersed boundary–lattice Boltzmann method. Computers & Fluids, 133, 103-115.
Norberg, R. Å. (1975). Hovering flight of the dragonfly Aeschna juncea L., kinematics and aerodynamics. in Swimming and Flying in Nature (pp. 763–781). Boston MA, USA: Springer Press.
O'hara, R. P., & Palazotto, A. N. (2012). The morphological characterization of the forewing of the Manduca sexta species for the application of biomimetic flapping wing micro air vehicles. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 7(4), 046011.
Ortega Ancel, A., Eastwood, R., Vogt, D., Ithier, C., Smith, M., Wood, R., & Kovač, M. (2017). Aerodynamic evaluation of wing shape and wing orientation in four butterfly species using numerical simulations and a low-speed wind tunnel, and its implications for the design of flying micro-robots. Interface Focus, 7(1), 20160087.
Pines, D. J., & Bohorquez, F. (2006). Challenges facing future micro-air-vehicle development. Journal of Aircraft, 43(2), 290-305.
Prasad, A. K. (2000). Particle image velocimetry. Current Science, 79, 51-60.
Ramamurti, R., & Sandberg, W. C. (2002). A three-dimensional computational study of the aerodynamic mechanisms of insect flight. Journal of Experimental Biology, 205(10), 1507-1518.
Ravi, S., Noda, R., Gagliardi, S., Kolomenskiy, D., Combes, S., Liu, H., Biewener A. A., & Konow, N. (2020). Modulation of flight muscle recruitment and wing rotation enables hummingbirds to mitigate aerial roll perturbations. Current Biology, 30(2), 187-195.
Rosen, M. H., le Pivain, G., Sahai, R., Jafferis, N. T., & Wood, R. J. (2016, May). Development of a 3.2 g untethered flapping-wing platform for flight energetics and control experiments. in 2016 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) (pp. 3227-3233). Stockholm, Sweden.
Ryu, Y., Chang, J. W., & Chung, J. (2016). Aerodynamic force and vortex structures of flapping flexible hawkmoth-like wings. Aerospace Science and Technology, 56, 183-196.
Sane, S. P. (2003). The aerodynamics of insect flight. Journal of Experimental Biology, 206(23), 4191-4208.
Sane, S. P., & Dickinson, M. H. (2002). The aerodynamic effects of wing rotation and a revised quasi-steady model of flapping flight. Journal of Experimental Biology, 205(8), 1087-1096.
Senda, K., Obara, T., Kitamura, M., Yokoyama, N., Hirai, N., & Iima, M. (2012). Effects of structural flexibility of wings in flapping flight of butterfly. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 7(2), 025002.
Shahzad, A., Tian, F. B., Young, J., & Lai, J. C. (2018). Effects of hawkmoth-like flexibility on the aerodynamic performance of flapping wings with different shapes and aspect ratios. Physics of Fluids, 30(9), 091902.
Shyy, W., & Liu, H. (2007). Flapping wings and aerodynamic lift: the role of leading-edge vortices. AIAA Journal, 45(12), 2817-2819.
Shyy, W., Aono, H., Chimakurthi, S. K., Trizila, P., Kang, C. K., Cesnik, C. E., & Liu, H. (2010). Recent progress in flapping wing aerodynamics and aeroelasticity. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 46(7), 284-327.
Shyy, W., Kang, C. K., Chirarattananon, P., Ravi, S., & Liu, H. (2016). Aerodynamics, sensing and control of insect-scale flapping-wing flight. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 472(2186), 20150712.
Shyy, W., Lian, Y., Tang, J., Viieru, D., & Liu, H. (2008). Aerodynamics of Low Reynolds Number Flyers. New York USA: Cambridge University Press.
Shyy, W., Trizila, P., Kang, C. K., & Aono, H. (2009). Can tip vortices enhance lift of a flapping wing? AIAA journal, 47(2), 289-293.
Slegers, N., Heilman, M., Cranford, J., Lang, A., Yoder, J., & Habegger, M. L. (2017). Beneficial aerodynamic effect of wing scales on the climbing flight of butterflies. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 12(1), 016013.
Sridhar, M., Kang, C. K., & Lee, T. (2020, Jan). Geometric formulation for the dynamics of monarch butterfly with the effects of abdomen undulation. in AIAA Scitech 2020 Forum. Orlando FL, USA.
Srygley, R. B., & Chai, P. (1990). Flight morphology of Neotropical butterflies: palatability and distribution of mass to the thorax and abdomen. Oecologia, 84(4), 491-499.
Srygley, R. B., & Thomas, A. L. R. (2002). Unconventional lift-generating mechanisms in free-flying butterflies. Nature, 420(6916), 660-664.
Sun, M., & Lan, S. L. (2004). A computational study of the aerodynamic forces and power requirements of dragonfly (Aeschna juncea) hovering. Journal of Experimental Biology, 207(11), 1887-1901.
Sun, M., & Tang, J. (2002). Lift and power requirements of hovering flight in Drosophila virilis. Journal of Experimental Biology, 205(16), 2413-2427.
Sunada S., Kawachi K., Watanabe I., & Azuma A. (1993). Performance of a butterfly in take-off flight. Journal of Experimental Biology 183(1), 249-277.
Suzuki, K., & Yoshino, M. (2018). Numerical simulations for aerodynamic performance of a butterfly-like flapping wing–body model with various wing planforms. Communications in Computational Physics, 23, 951-979.
Suzuki, K., Aoki, T., & Yoshino, M. (2019). Effect of chordwise wing flexibility on flapping flight of a butterfly model using immersed-boundary lattice Boltzmann simulations. Physical Review E, 100(1), 013104.
Suzuki, K., Minami, K., & Inamuro, T. (2015). Lift and thrust generation by a butterfly-like flapping wing–body model: immersed boundary–lattice Boltzmann simulations. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 767, 659-695.
Tanaka, H., & Shimoyama, I. (2010). Forward flight of swallowtail butterfly with simple flapping motion. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 5(2), 026003.
Tian, F. B., Luo, H., Song, J., & Lu, X. Y. (2013). Force production and asymmetric deformation of a flexible flapping wing in forward flight. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 36, 149-161.
Trizila, P., Kang, C. K., Aono, H., Shyy, W., & Visbal, M. (2011). Low-Reynolds-number aerodynamics of a flapping rigid flat plate. AIAA Journal, 49(4), 806-823.
Van den Berg, C., & Ellington, C. P. (1997). The three-dimensional leading-edge vortex of a ‘hovering’model hawkmoth. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 352(1351), 329-340.
van Veen, W. G., van Leeuwen, J. L., & Muijres, F. T. (2019). A chordwise offset of the wing-pitch axis enhances rotational aerodynamic forces on insect wings: a numerical study. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 16(155), 20190118.
Vollmers, H. (2001). Detection of vortices and quantitative evaluation of their main parameters from experimental velocity data. Measurement Science and Technology, 12(8), 1199-1207.
Wagner H. (1925). Über die Entstehung des dynamischen Auftriebes von Tragflügeln. ZAMM‐Journal of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics/Zeitschrift für Angewandte Mathematik und Mechanik, 5(1), 17-35.
Walker, S. M., Thomas, A. L., & Taylor, G. K. (2010). Deformable wing kinematics in free-flying hoverflies. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 7(42), 131-142.
Wan, H., Dong, H., & Gai, K. (2015). Computational investigation of cicada aerodynamics in forward flight. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 12(102), 20141116.
Wang, J. K., & Sun, M. (2005). A computational study of the aerodynamics and forewing-hindwing interaction of a model dragonfly in forward flight. Journal of Experimental Biology, 208(19), 3785-3804.
Wang, J. K., & Sun, M. (2005). A computational study of the aerodynamics and forewing-hindwing interaction of a model dragonfly in forward flight. Journal of Experimental Biology, 208(19), 3785-3804.
Weis-Fogh, T. (1973). Quick estimates of flight fitness in hovering animals, including novel mechanisms for lift production. Journal of Experimental Biology, 59(1), 169-230.
Willmott, A. P., & Ellington, C. P. (1997). The mechanics of flight in the hawkmoth Manduca sexta. I. Kinematics of hovering and forward flight. Journal of Experimental Biology, 200(21), 2705-2722.
Willmott, A. P., & Ellington, C. P. (1997). The mechanics of flight in the hawkmoth Manduca sexta. I. Kinematics of hovering and forward flight. Journal of Experimental Biology, 200(21), 2705-2722.
Wu, D., Yeo, K. S., & Lim, T. T. (2014). A numerical study on the free hovering flight of a model insect at low Reynolds number. Computers & Fluids, 103(1), 234-261.
Wu, J. Z., Xiong, A. K. & Yang, Y. T. (2005). Axial stretching and vortex definition. Physics of Fluids, 17(3), 135-145.
Xiong, Z., & Liu, X. (2019). Numerical investigation on evolutionary characteristics of the leading-edge vortex induced by flapping caudal fin. Physics of Fluids, 31(12), 125117.
Yokoyama, N., Senda, K., Iima, M., & Hirai, N. (2013). Aerodynamic forces and vortical structures in flapping butterfly's forward flight. Physics of Fluids, 25(2), 021902.
Yokoyama, N., Senda, K., Iima, M., & Hirai, N. (2013). Aerodynamic forces and vortical structures in flapping butterfly's forward flight. Physics of Fluids, 25(2), 021902.
Young, J., Walker, S. M., Bomphrey, R. J., Taylor, G. K., & Thomas, A. L. (2009). Details of insect wing design and deformation enhance aerodynamic function and flight efficiency. Science, 325(5947), 1549-1552.
Zhang, Y., Wang, X., Wang, S., Huang, W., & Weng, Q. (2021). Kinematic and Aerodynamic Investigation of the Butterfly in Forward Free Flight for the Butterfly-Inspired Flapping Wing Air Vehicle. Applied Sciences, 11(6), 2620.
Zheng, L., Hedrick, T. L., & Mittal, R. (2013). Time-varying wing-twist improves aerodynamic efficiency of forward flight in butterflies. PloS One, 8(1), e53060.
Zheng, L., Hedrick, T., & Mittal, R. (2013). A comparative study of the hovering efficiency of flapping and revolving wings. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 8(3), 036001.
Zou, P. Y., Lai, Y. H., & Yang, J. T. (2019). Effects of phase lag on the hovering flight of damselfly and dragonfly. Physical Review E, 100(6), 063102.
章聿珩(2010)。運動學參數對鳥類拍撲翼之升力影響。臺灣大學機械工程學系碩士論文。
蘇健元(2013)。綠繡眼高操控性飛行之生物力學研究。臺灣大學機械工程學系博士論文。
王相博(2013)。蝴蝶撲翼姿態對飛行影響之研究。臺灣大學機械工程學系碩士論文。
費約翰(2016)。蝴蝶身體俯仰動態之飛行動力機制與飛行操控研究。台灣大學機械工程學系博士論文。
王彥傑(2016)。腹部動態對蝴蝶仿生飛行器控制之研究。臺灣大學機械工程學系碩士論文。
李哲安(2017)。翅膀後掠動態對蝴蝶拍撲飛行之影響。臺灣大學機械工程學系暨研究所碩士論文。
邱筠雅(2020)。撓性與旋轉角於大白斑蝶及仿蝴蝶拍撲機構升力之影響。臺灣大學機械工程學系碩士論文。
賴渝翔(2021)。豆娘飛行動力最佳化分析與飛行操控機制研究。臺灣大學機械工程學系博士論文。
洪千茵(2021)。仿蝴蝶飛行器機構設計與模擬飛行測試。臺灣大學機械工程學系碩士論文。
-
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/85233-
dc.description.abstract本研究以蝴蝶飛行為研究標的,探討其翅膀旋轉之飛行動力機制與翅膀撓性效應,提出仿昆蟲微飛行器翅膀動作與設計之創新見解。蝴蝶飛行機動性極高,舉凡後飛、俯衝、倒飛或急轉皆易如反掌,較低的拍撲頻率在工程應用上也更具有可行性,是拍撲微飛行器設計很好的參考對象。
相較於其他昆蟲,蝴蝶使用較小幅度的翅膀旋轉動作飛行,通過對真實飛行蝴蝶動力學的分析,蝴蝶之翅膀旋轉振幅大約為45度,且旋轉的振幅與飛行方向呈現正相關。根據量測的蝴蝶動作,建立數值模擬重現蝴蝶飛行,發現具有旋轉角的蝴蝶相比無旋轉角的蝴蝶能產生更大升力,蝴蝶控制自身的翅膀旋轉幅度則可增強尾流捕獲效應,從而增加向前推進力。對於翅膀旋轉幅度較小的動作,下拍中產生的脫離渦漩會誘導尾流區域之空氣流向翅膀,使蝴蝶能夠捕獲誘導氣流獲得額外的向前推進力,這股額外推力佔所有推進力的47%以上。而當翅膀旋轉振幅超過45度時,脫離渦漩誘導的氣流流向則遠離翅膀,並減少了尾流捕獲效應造成蝴蝶失去部分向前推進力。
脫離渦漩誘導的氣流影響蝴蝶的空氣作用力,當左右翅之脫離渦漩融合成渦漩環時,將形成強烈的誘導射流,對蝴蝶的飛行方向十分很重要,過去的研究指出,此射流可以通過自身的身體角度來操控。本研究中發現除了身體角度之外,翅膀的撓性變形也能改變射流方向。真實蝴蝶飛行實驗中,身體角度隨著前飛速度的降低而逐漸增大,蝴蝶懸停飛行時(飛行速度極低),身體幾乎垂直於地面;從流場可視化實驗中得知,當翅膀前後拍動時,誘導射流卻不斷向下方流動。數值模擬結果顯示,翅膀在具有撓性的情況下,翼後緣渦漩會在拍撲的中段之後分離。逆時針旋轉的脫離翼後緣渦漩與順時針旋轉的翼前緣渦漩,在尾流區域同時誘導空氣向下流動。此外,隨著翅膀變形幅度增加,射流的方向將更為垂直,形成強烈的向下射流,而這種情況沒有出現在剛性翅膀模型中。受真實蝴蝶啟發,研究發現翅膀撓性可改變射流方向,在蝴蝶懸停飛行時得以支撐其身體重量。
大多數昆蟲在飛行過程中都會經歷某種程度的翅膀變形,翅膀撓性的增加改變昆蟲的空氣動力學表現,本研究最後藉由可視化流場技術與仿蝴蝶拍撲機構,結合翅膀旋轉及翅膀撓性,研究翅膀在不同旋轉時機之流場變化,研究發現在領先、對稱及延遲三個不同旋轉時機下,撓性翅膀結合對稱旋轉,相比於領先及延遲旋轉有更強的翼前緣渦漩,且三種旋轉時機之撓性翅膀上的翼前緣渦漩皆比剛性翅膀更貼附於翅膀表面上,較強與較為貼附的翼前緣渦漩表示有更大的空氣作用力產生。從變形量量測實驗得知,撓性翅膀通過對稱旋轉能產生更大的彎曲位移,從而增加翅膀額外的拍撲速度,增強翼前緣渦漩的強度。
本研究的觀察與分析得到蝴蝶飛行之機制或策略,可運用在仿昆蟲拍撲微飛行器開發上,不論翅膀設計、翅膀動作或是研究概念、實驗架設方法,皆能提供未來設計上參考之不同思維。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThis dissertation conducts the biological experiment on the butterfly flight. By exploring the flight dynamics of the wing-pitch rotation and the wing flexibility effect, we propose innovative insights into the wing motion and the design of insect-like micro-aerial vehicles. Butterflies have an extraordinary flying behavior. They can easily fly backward, upside down, dive or even sharp turn in few seconds. Lower flapping frequency of a butterfly is more feasible in engineering applications, which is a good reference for a flapping micro-aerial aircraft design.
Compared with other insects, butterflies fly with a smaller wing-pitch amplitude during flight. Through the dynamic analysis of a real flying butterflies, the wing-pitch amplitude of a butterfly is about 45 degrees, and the amplitude is positively correlated with the flight direction. Based on an established numerical simulation refined by the experimental data, the flight of the butterfly model with wing-pitch rotation is found to be generated more aerodynamic forces than the butterfly model without wing-pitch rotation. A butterfly can control its wing-pitch angle to increases the forward propulsion by the wake-capture effect. For a small wing-pitch amplitude, the detached vortex generated in the downstroke induce the air in the wake to flow to the wings, so that the butterfly captured the induced flow to obtain additional forward propulsion, which accounts for no less than 47% of all the propulsion. When the wing-pitch amplitude exceeds 45 degrees, the direction of the induced airflow by the detached vortex is move away from the wing, reducing the wake-capture effect, and causing the butterfly to lose part of its forward propulsion.
The induced flow of the detached vortex affects the aerodynamic forces of the butterfly. When the detached vortices of the left and the right wings merges into a vortex ring in the wake, a strong induced jet-flow, which is very important for the flight direction of the butterfly will be formed behind the wing. The jet-flow directed the propulsion of a butterfly, which can be manipulated by its body angle. In this study, we found that, besides the body angle, the chordwise deformation of the wings can also alter the direction of the jet-flow. In the experiment of a real flying butterfly, the body angle gradually increased with the decrease of the forward flight speed. When the butterfly hovers (lower limit of flight speed), the body is almost perpendicular to the ground; the induced jet continuously flows downward when the wing flaps forward and backward in the flow visualization experiment. The results of the numerical simulation show that the trailing-edge vortex detached after the mid-downstroke with the flexible wing model. The counterclockwise detached trailing-edge vortex and the clockwise leading-edge vortex induce air to flow downward in the wake region. In addition, the direction of the jet-flow become more vertical as the chordwise deformation of the wing increases, forming a strong downward jet-flow; this condition did not appear in the rigid wing model. Inspired by real butterflies, this study found that the chordwise deformation of the wing can alter the direction of the jet-flow to support its weight during hovering flight.
Most insects experience some degree of wing deformation during flight. The increase in wing flexibility changes the aerodynamic performance of insects. In this study, the visualization of flow field technology and the imitation butterfly flapping mechanism combined with wing rotation and wing Flexibility, study the change of the flow field of the wing at different rotation timings. The study found that under the three different rotation timings of lead, symmetry and delay, the flexible wing combined with symmetrical rotation has a stronger leading edge than the leading and delayed rotation. vortices, and the leading edge vortices on the flexible wings of the three rotation timings are more attached to the wing surface than the rigid wings. According to past research, the stronger and more attached leading edge vortices both show Greater air force is generated. It is known from the deformation measurement experiment that the flexible wing can generate a larger bending displacement through symmetrical rotation, thereby increasing the additional flapping speed of the wing and enhancing the strength of the leading-edge vortex of the wing.
Most of the insects experience some degree of wing flexibility during flight, which changes the aerodynamic performance. In this study, the butterfly-like flapping mechanism combined with wing-pitch angle and wing flexibility was established to study the flow field of different timing of wing-pitch angle by the flow field visualization experiment. The study found that under three different timing of wing-pitch angle, including advanced, symmetric and delayed rotation, the flexible wing combined with symmetric rotation has a stronger leading-edge vortex than advanced and delayed rotation. In addition, the leading-edge vortices on the flexible wings are more attached to the wing surface than the rigid wings; it indicates the aerodynamic forces on the flexible wing is greater than on the rigid wing. From the experimental measurement of wing deformation we found the flexible wing with symmetric rotation induced more bending displacement, which increased an additional flapping speed of the wing and enhanced the strength of the leading edge vortex of the wing.
The mechanism or strategy of the butterfly flight obtained in this study through the observation and the analysis of a real flying butterfly can be used in the development of insect-like micro-aerial vehicles. The novelty of the wing design, the wing motion, research concepts, or even the methods of experimental procedures all provide different ideas for the design of micro-aerial vehicles in the future.
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2023-03-19T22:51:54Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
U0001-3107202212234100.pdf: 16164766 bytes, checksum: 820b80b31f3d6a539a60a9532f74a8f7 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2022
en
dc.description.tableofcontents口試委員會審定書 i
致謝 ii
摘要 iv
Abstract vi
符號說明 ix
圖表目錄 xix
第一章 前言 1
第二章 文獻回顧 3
2-1 傳統固定翼與昆蟲飛行力學 3
2-1.1 飛行器種類 4
2-1.2 昆蟲拍撲飛行介紹 6
2-1.3 昆蟲飛行模式 7
2-1.4 拍撲飛行力學無因次參數 9
2-1.5 升阻力與失速 10
2-1.6 庫塔條件與Kutta Joukowski定理 13
2-1.7 華格納效應 14
2-2 昆蟲飛行空氣動力學機制 15
2-2.1 翼前緣渦漩貼附現象 16
2-2.2 翅膀快速旋轉機制 18
2-2.3 尾流捕獲與附加質量效應 21
2-2.4 夾翼與拋翼 23
2-3 蝴蝶相關研究 24
2-3.1 蝶類身體構造 24
2-3.2 翅膀型態研究 26
2-3.3 身體俯仰動作 28
2-3.4 蝴蝶飛行操控 30
2-3.5 蝴蝶飛行流場研究 31
2-4 研究動機與預期貢獻 35
第三章 研究方法 38
3-1 生物飛行動態 39
3-1.1 蝴蝶觀察與量測 39
3-1.2 生物實驗架設 42
3-1.3飛行座標系與動作分析 44
3-1.4 因次分析 46
3-2 數值模擬 50
3-2.1 軟體介紹 51
3-2.2 蝴蝶模型建立 51
3-2.3 運動方程式 53
3-2.4 統御方程式與邊界條件 55
3-2.5 網格與動態網格 56
3-2.6 求解器設定 59
3-2.7 尤拉角座標轉換 60
3-2.8 網格獨立性測試與自由飛行模擬驗證 61
3-2.9 撓性翅膀模擬 64
3-3 粒子影像測速實驗 66
3-3.1 可視化流場實驗架設 66
3-3.2 示蹤粒子隨流性分析 68
3-3.3渦流鑑識法 68
3-4 拍撲機構實驗 70
3-4.1 機構設計與馬達控制 70
3-4.2 可調控之身體俯仰角 72
3-4.3 翅膀材質與模型製作 73
3-4.4 機構動作驗證 75
3-4.5 翅膀變形量量測實驗 76
第四章 蝴蝶飛行之翅膀旋轉動力機制 79
4-1 蝴蝶生物實驗 79
4-1.1 實驗觀察 79
4-1.2 蝴蝶飛行之翅膀動作量測 81
4-1.3 翅膀旋轉與飛行速度關係 85
4-2 蝴蝶數值模擬 87
4-2.1 翅膀旋轉角的重要性 87
4-2.2 有無翅膀旋轉之流場影響 89
4-3 翅膀旋轉幅度對蝴蝶飛行影響 95
4-3.1 固定變化來流 95
4-3.2 氣動力分析 96
4-4 流場機制分析 98
4-4.1 下拍之流場機制–垂直氣動力 99
4-4.2 下拍之流場機制–水平氣動力 101
4-4.3 上拍之流場機制–αA < 45o 101
4-4.4 上拍之流場機制–αA > 45o 102
4-4.5 不同αA下蝴蝶的空氣作用力 103
4-5 蝴蝶飛行的尾流捕獲效應 105
4-5.1 拍撲轉換時期的暫態機制 105
4-5.2 尾流捕獲驗證 110
4-5.3 高速飛行下蝴蝶翅膀旋轉振幅對氣動力的影響 111
4-6 自由飛行與功率消耗 112
第五章 蝴蝶懸停之翅膀撓性效應 116
5-1 蝴蝶身體俯仰角推論與量測 116
5-2 蝴蝶自由飛行流場可視化研究 119
5-2.1 前飛流場機制 119
5-2.2 懸停流場機制 123
5-3 懸停蝴蝶撓性翅膀流場機制 126
5-3.1 懸停蝴蝶數值模擬 126
5-3.2 撓性翅膀數值模擬設定 127
5-3.3 撓性參數化研究 129
5-3.4 渦漩的貼附與脫離現象 131
5-3.5 射流方向變化 136
5-3.6 流場可視化實驗討論 140
第六章 撓性翅膀與翅膀旋轉角之耦合 143
6-1 機構流場可視化與相平均法 143
6-2 撓性與剛性翅膀的流場機制 146
6-2.1 渦漩的貼附與分離現象 146
6-2.2 渦漩間的交互作用 148
6-3 翅膀旋轉相位分析 148
6-3.1 不同旋轉相位之渦漩結構 148
6-3.2 環流量計算 150
6-4 撓性翅膀變形量量測 153
6-4.1 弦向彎曲變形 154
6-4.2 展向彎曲變形 155
第七章 結論與未來展望 159
7-1 結論 159
7-2 未來展望 161
參考文獻 163
-
dc.language.isozh_TW-
dc.subject射流角度zh_TW
dc.subject仿蝴蝶拍撲機構zh_TW
dc.subject旋轉時機zh_TW
dc.subject向前推進力zh_TW
dc.subject誘導氣流zh_TW
dc.subject尾流捕獲zh_TW
dc.subject翅膀撓性zh_TW
dc.subject翅膀旋轉角zh_TW
dc.subject蝴蝶飛行zh_TW
dc.subjectinduced flowen
dc.subjectwing-pitch phase angleen
dc.subjectwing flexibilityen
dc.subjectbutterfly-like flapping mechanismen
dc.subjectforward propulsionen
dc.subjectwake captureen
dc.subjectbutterfly flighten
dc.subjectwing-pitch angleen
dc.subjectjet-flow directionen
dc.title蝴蝶飛行之翅膀旋轉動力機制分析與翅膀撓性效應zh_TW
dc.titleFlight Dynamics of Wing-pitch Rotation Coupled with Wing Flexibility Analysis on Butterflyen
dc.typeThesis-
dc.date.schoolyear110-2-
dc.description.degree博士-
dc.contributor.author-orcid0000-0003-0985-6027
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee楊瑞珍;趙怡欽;陳志臣;王安邦;陳慶耀;潘國隆;葉思沂zh_TW
dc.contributor.oralexamcommitteeRuey-Jen Yang;Yei-Chin Chao;Jyh-Chen Chen;An-Bang Wang;Ching-Yao Chen;Kuo-Long Pan;Szu-I Yehen
dc.subject.keyword蝴蝶飛行,翅膀旋轉角,翅膀撓性,尾流捕獲,誘導氣流,向前推進力,射流角度,仿蝴蝶拍撲機構,旋轉時機,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordbutterfly flight,wing-pitch angle,wing flexibility,wake capture,induced flow,forward propulsion,jet-flow direction,butterfly-like flapping mechanism,wing-pitch phase angle,en
dc.relation.page176-
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU202201908-
dc.rights.note同意授權(限校園內公開)-
dc.date.accepted2022-08-02-
dc.contributor.author-college工學院-
dc.contributor.author-dept機械工程學系-
dc.date.embargo-lift2022-09-01-
Appears in Collections:機械工程學系

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
ntu-110-2.pdf
Access limited in NTU ip range
15.79 MBAdobe PDF
Show simple item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved