Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 生物資源暨農學院
  3. 園藝暨景觀學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/85228
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor張育森(Yu-Sen Chang)
dc.contributor.authorJou-Hui Wangen
dc.contributor.author王柔惠zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-19T22:51:35Z-
dc.date.copyright2022-08-03
dc.date.issued2022
dc.date.submitted2022-08-01
dc.identifier.citation參考文獻(References) Avuini-Kadresengan. 2001. 野百合之歌-魯凱族的生命禮讚. フルール. 2011. 品花語·玩花飾. 臺灣東販股份有限公司. 臺北. 臺灣. 行政院農業委員會. 2022a. 農業統計年報. 12 April 2022. <https://agrstat.coa.gov.tw/sdweb/public/book/Book.aspx>. 行政院農業委員會 2022b. 農產品批發市場交易行情站. 12 April 2022. <https://amis.afa.gov.tw/main/Main.aspx>. 何小唐. 1999. 生活花藝. 世界圖書出版公司. 北京. 中國. 吳國政. 2020. 從臺灣花卉產業內需市場振興方案談未來產業推廣方向. 農政視野:12-19. 吳淑芬. 1995. 花的奇妙世界. 綠生活國際股份有限公司. 臺北. 臺灣. 李英豪. 1994. 送花的藝術. 藝術圖書公司. 臺北. 臺灣. 汪昭華. 2010. 臺北花卉批發市場遷建之政策分析. 國立臺灣大學政治學研究所碩士論文. 臺北. 林建成. 2016. 文化場域與空間轉換中的族群展演: 以嘉蘭村魯凱族百合花記為例. 臺東大學人文學報 6:1-34. 林德福、劉昭吟. 2004. 越界產銷網絡中農業區域的新挑戰*—以台灣花卉產業發展為例. 國立台灣大學建築與城鄉研究學報 11:35-53. 張惠琴. 2016. 陶淵明的詩文及其思想研究. 東海大學中國文學系碩士在職專班學位論文. 臺北. 陳立儀、吳國政. 2020. 臺灣花卉產業概況與輔導措施. 臺中區農業改良場特刊 142:1-9. 陳信行. 2004. 我的野百合—一個1990年三月學運參與者的自我批評. 台灣社會研究季刊 54:253-276. 陳根旺. 2017. 從花卉拍賣市場看臺灣花卉消費需求. 花卉生活應用研討會專刊 1:2-20. 陳根旺. 2020. 花藝素材百科600種切花、乾燥花、永生花材完全圖鑑. 城邦文化事業股份有限公司. 臺北. 臺灣. 黃麗君、R.H Mattson. 2001. 花卉顏色屬性與香味屬性對消費者花卉購買意願之影響研究. 農林學報 50:43-55. 楊世瑩. 2020. SPSS 26統計分析嚴選教材. 碁峰資訊股份有限公司. 臺北. 臺灣. 葉曉青. 2003. 園林植物與中國文化認同. 二十一世紀雙月刊 76:111-117. 賈軍、卓麗環. 2010. 花語綜議. 北京林業大學學報(社會科學版) 9: 54-57. 趙毅衡. 2012. 符號學. 新銳文創. 臺北. 臺灣. 劉全儒. 2017. 史上最完整景觀花卉療癒大百科. 漢湘文化. 臺北. 臺灣. 潘富俊. 2014. 跨界新時代經典詩經植物圖鑑. 貓頭鷹出版社. 臺北. 臺灣. 蔡知臻. 2020. 蕓朵現代詩之創作美學與「花」意象探析. 35:7-44. 薛聰賢、江茹伶. 1999. 新世紀生活花典. 臺灣埔綠有限公司出版部. 臺北. 臺灣. 謝廷芳、林鈴娜. 2011. 我國花卉產業需求與未來研發方向. 花卉研究團隊研究現況與展望研討會專刊:173-183. 顧雪梁. 2000. 中外花語花趣辭典. 浙江人民出版社. 浙江. 中國. Ajzen, I. 1991. The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 50:179-211. Aldous, D.E. 2013. Extrinsic and intrinsic attributes used in the selection and quality control of ornamental crops., Vol. 90, pp. 59-67. Acta Hort. ISHS. Anonymous. 1991. The languege of flowers. Fam. Circle 104:72-79. Ara, H. and M.M. Hosen. 2017. Exploring the floral marketing practices: an investigation of the retail floral traders of Bangladesh. Eur. J. of Bus. and Manag. 9:28-38. Assn., P.P.G. 1991. Gallup survey gives insight into gift-giving preferences. In “PPGA News (March)”. Asuero, A.G., A. Sayago, and A.G. Gonz´alez. 2006. The Correlation Coefficient: An Overview. Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem. 36:41-59. Bagozzi, R.P. and R.E. Burnkrant. 1979. Attitude organization and the attitude–behavior relationship. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 37:913-929. Balzac, H.d. 1835. Le Lys dans la vallée. ‎Carroll and Graf, New York. Becker, W.A. 1993. Products, services, and consumer perceptions of service quality in the retail floral industry of Texas. Texas A&M Univ., College Station, PhD Diss. Behe, B.K. 1993. Floral marketing and consumer research. HortScience 28:11-14. Behe, B.K. and S. Barton. 2000. Consumer perceptions of product and service quality attributes in six U.S. state. J. Environ. Hort. 18:71-78. Behe, B.K. and D.J. Wolnick. 1991. Type of floral product purchased and demographic characteristics and floral knowledge of consumers. HortScience 26:414-416. Behe, B.K. and D.W. Wolnick. 1988. A purchasing profile. Soc. Amer. Florists. 5:30-35. Blunt, W. 1966. Hortulus Walahfrid Strabp. The hunt botanical library, Pennsylvania. Bouding, W., A. Kalra, R. Staelin, and V.A. Zeithaml. 1993. A dynamic processs model of service quality: from expectations to behavioral intentions. J. Mark. Res. 30:7-27. Child, D. 2006. The essentials of factor analysis. 3rd ed. Bloomsbury Academic, New York. Costa, P.T. and R.R. McCrae. 1992. The introduction of the five-factor model and its application. J. Pers. 60:175-215. Costello, A.B. and J.W. Osborne. 2005. Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Pract. Assess. Res. Eval. 10:1-9. Croft, M. 2016. The language of flowers in contemporary France. Honors senior thesis. Cronbach, L.J. 1951. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 16:297-334. Cytowic, R.E. 1989. Synaesthesia: A union of the senses. Springer, Berlin. D'Andrade, R. and M. Egan. 1974. The color of emotion. Am. Ethnol. 1:49-63. Demby, E. 1973. A psychographic study of the market for flowers. American Florists Marketing Council, Virginia. Dickson, P.R. and J.L. Ginter. 1987. Market segmentation, product differentiation, and marketing strategy. J. Mark. 51:1-10. Dietz, S.T. 2020. The complete language of flowers. A definitive and illustrated history. Wellfleet Press, New York. Doyle, K.O., A.M. Hanchek, and J. McGrew. 1994. Communication in the language of flowers. HortTechnology 4:211-216. Emboden, W.A. 1981. Transcultural use of narcotic water lilies in ancient Egyptian and Maya drug ritual. J. Ethnopharmacol 3:39-83. Engel, J.F., R.D. Blackwell, and P.W. Miniard. 1995. Consumer behavior. Dryden Press, New York. Faraway, J.F. 2002. Practical regression and anova using R. 31 May 2022. <https://onlinebooks.library.upenn.edu/webbin/book/lookupid?key=olbp89467>. Fărcaş, C.P., V. Cristea, S. Fărcaş, T.M. Ursu, and A. Roman. 2015. The symbolism of garden and orchard plants and their representation in paintings (I). Contrib. Bot. 50:189-200. Fish, M. and I. Ajzen. 1975. Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley, Massachusetts. Fornell, C. and D.F. Larcker. 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Mark. Res. 18:39-50. Golgi, B. 2013. Study of antecedents of purchase intention and its effect on brand loyalty of private label brand of apparel. Int. J. Sales Mark. 3:73-86. Goody, J. 1992. The Culture of Flowers. Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge, New York. Hair, J.F., R.E. Anderson, R.L. Tatham, and W.C. Black. 1998. Multivariate data analysis. Prentice Hall, New Jersey. Haviland, J.J., H.H. Rosario, P. Wilson, and T.R. McGuire. 2005. An environmental approach to positive emotion: Flowers. Evol. Psychol. 3:104-132. Hoegg, J. and J.W. Alba. 2008. A role for aesthetics in consumer psychology Handbook of consumer psychology. Mahwah, New Jersey. Huang, L.C. 2007. Behavioral differences in prepurchase processes between purchasers of flowers for self use and for gift use. HortTechnology 17:183-190. Huang, W.Y. 2010. Brand story and perceived brand image: evidence from Taiwan. J. Fam. Econ. Issue 31:307-317. Joshi, M. 2014. Dictionary of root words: Greek and Latin roots. CreateSpace, California. Kaiser, H.F. 1970. A second generation little jiffy. Psychometrika 35:401-415. Kaiser, H.F. 1974. An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrica 39:31-36. Keane, W. 2003. Semiotics and the social analysis of material things. Lang. Commun. 23:409-425. Kim, H.H., Y.J. Kyung, K. Ohkawa, C.H. Pak, and B.H. Kwack. 1999. Flower industry in Korea. pp. 407-414. Acta Hort. ISHS. Labrecque, L.I. and G.R. Milne. 2012. Exciting red and competent blue: the importance of color in marketing. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 40:711-727. Levitt, T. 1988. The pluralization of consumption. Harv. Bus. Rev. 88:7-8. Lorris, G. 1993. Roman de la Rose. University of Pennsylvania Press, New York. Lutz, R.J., S.B. Mackenzie, and G.E. Belch. 1986. The role of attitude toward the A.D. as a mediator of advertising effectiveness: A test of competing explanations. J. Mark. Res. 23:130-143. Marks, L.E. 1987. On cross-cultural similarity: auditoryvisual interactions in speeded discrimination. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 13:384-394. Marsh, J. and K. Greenaway. 1978. The illuminated language of flowers. Macdonald and Jane's, London. Melara, R.D., L.E. Marks, and B.C. Potts. 1993. Primacy of dimensions in color perception. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 19. Mohiuddin, M. 2016. Flower business flourish floriculture: Astudy in Bangladesh. Int. J. Bus. Manag. Invent. 5:9-13. Oppenheim, P.P. 1996. Understanding the factors influencing consumer choice of cut flowers: A means-end approach. pp. 415-422. Acta Hort. ISHS. Ozzambak, M.E., E. Zeybekoglu, O. Tuncay, S. Baser, G. Haspolat, and A. Olgun. 2009. A survey on cut flower preferences and expectations., pp. 771-776. Acta Hort. ISHS. Page, C. and P.M. Herr. 2002. An investigation of the processes by which product design and brand strength interact to determine initial affect and quality judgments. J. Consum. Psychol. 12:133-147. Palma, M.A. and R.W. Ward. 2010. Measuring demand factors influencing market penetration and buying frequency for flowers in the U.S. Int. Food Agribus. Manag. 13:65-82. Philippe, S. 2021. Pourquoi les chrysanthèmes symbolisent la mort en France. 31 May 2022. <https://www.leprogres.fr/magazine-tourisme-et-patrimoine/2021/10/29/joie-bonheur-dans-le-monde-pourquoi-les-chrysanthemes-symbolisent-le-deuil-en-france>. Pickles, S. 1990. The language of flowers. Harmony Books, New York. Rhin, A.L., C. Yue, B.K. Behe, and C. Hall. 2011. Generation X and Y attitudes toeard fresh flowers as gifts: implications for the floral industry. HortScience 46:736-743. Rhin, A.L., C. Yue, C. Hall, and B.K. Behe. 2014. Consumer preferences for longevity information and guarantees on cut flower arrangements. HortScience 49:769-778. Saussure, F. 1966. Course in general linguistics. McGraw-Hill, New York. Schiffman, L.G. and L.L. Kanuk. 2000. Consumer bahavior. 7th ed. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, N.J. Schiffman, L.G. and L.L. Kanuk. 2007. Consumer behavior. 9th ed. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, N.J. Seaton, B. 1995. The Language of Flowers: a history. University of Virginia Press, Virginia. Shakespeare, W. 2003. Hamlet. Washington Square Press, New York. Skinner, C.M. 2018. Myths and legends of flowers, trees, fruits, and plants: in all ages and in all climates. Forgotten Books, London. Smith, W.R. 1956. Product differentiation and market segmentation as alternative marketing strategies. J. Mark. 21:3-8. Strabo, W. and R.B. Palmer. 1951. Liber de cultura hortorum: text, introduction, translation and commentary. Penn. Univ., Philadelphia, PhD Diss. Tour, C.L. 1920. Le langage des fleurs. Garnier, Paris. Ward, J. 2004. Emotionally mediated synaesthesia. Cogn. Neuropsychol. 21:761-772. Ward, R.W. 1997. “Evaluating promoflor: have the promotions of fresh cut flowers and greens had an impact,” National Promoflor Council. Florida Univ., Florida. Wertenbroch, K. and B. Skiera. 2002. Measuring consumers' willingness to pay at the point of purchase. J. Mark. Res. 39:228-241. Yue, C. and B. B.K. 2008. Estimating US consumers’ choice of floral retail outlets. HortScience 43:764-769. Yue, C. and B.K. Behe. 2010. Consumer color preferences for single-stem cut flowers on calendar holidays and noncalendar occasions. HortScience 45:78-82. Yue, C. and C. Hall. 2010. Traditional or specialty cut flowers? Estimating US consumers’ choice of cut flowers at noncalendar occasions. HortScience 45:382-386. Yue, C., S. Zhao, and A.L. Rhin. 2017. Marketing tactics to increase millennial floral purchases. In “ASHS Annual Conference”. ASHS.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/85228-
dc.description.abstract臺灣花卉產業近年來在外銷市場面臨其他國家競爭,內銷市場則面臨消費市場萎縮的問題,除了需要生產高品質的花卉商品並降低生產的人力成本外,開拓國內消費市場,並提升國人花卉購買量亦相當重要。花語(flower language)為花卉所代表的寓意,為花卉商品的特性之一,具有象徵基礎及文化脈絡,會因為國家文化背景與時代不同而有所差異。本研究目的為調查臺灣花卉消費市場,探討消費行為、花卉商品特性及消費者偏好的關聯性,以及花語對消費者購買意願和願付價格的影響,並彙整花語及花卉之適用場合。 本研究採用立意取樣(purposive sampling),並以線上問卷進行調查,探討臺灣消費者之花卉消費習慣及花語適用性,並將花卉應用場合分為節慶用花、社交用花及平日用花三類。試驗結果顯示,臺灣花卉消費市場中,年齡為20-29歲消費者之購買花卉商品的頻率及金額最低,而45-49歲消費者的消費金額及頻率居最;個人月收入較高的消費者,其購買花卉產品的頻率、金額及對花卉商品的願付價格最高。此外,消費者對於花卉商品特性的偏好具有異質性,在尺寸、花語及價格方面尤其明顯。正向詞彙在花語的應用中遠較負向詞彙多,且花語象徵基礎多為文學作品及傳說典故,不一定和顏色具有相關性。提供花語及適用花卉彙整表,能增進消費者對花卉的認識;此外,因為許多花卉的花語會有相同的情形,故在各種用花場合中適用花卉不只一種,消費者可根據個人偏好及花卉產期進行選擇。在節慶用花、社交用花及平日用花三大用花場合,提供花語及適用花卉彙整表,能提升消費者對花卉商品的購買意願,增加花卉商品的價值,進而提高消費者對部分花卉商品的願付價格。整體而言,消費者對花語的重視程度、顏色喜好度、態度、行為意向均會影響其對花卉商品之購買意願及願付價格,且影響程度會隨商品及人口變數不同而有所差異,而男性更傾向認為花語能表現花卉的獨特性及表達個人情感,且花語更容易影響男性對花卉的觀感及購買意願;但整體而言,女性消費者對花卉商品的購買意願均較男性消費者高。 綜合研究結論,建議銷售花卉產品時,可將花語作為花卉商品的廣告素材,增進花卉商品與生活的連結,以觸及更多元的消費族群,並將消費者進行市場區隔,分為20-29歲、30-49歲及50歲以上三個群體,根據其消費樣貌訂定行銷策略。此外,針對不具有穩定購花行為之消費者,能以花語作為行銷素材引起興趣,並提供價格實惠花卉商品,同時建立多元購花管道,擴大花卉消費族群並促進臺灣花卉消費市場。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractIn recent years, Taiwan's flower industry has faced competition from other countries in the export market, while the domestic market has faced the problem of consumer market shrinking. In addition to producing high-quality flower products and reducing labor costs, expanding the domestic consumer market. Moreover, increasing the purchase amount of flowers by the locals is also very important. The language of flower is the meaning represented by flowers, which is one of the characteristics of flower products. The purpose of this research is to investigate the flower consumption market in Taiwan, to clarify the relationship between consumption behavior, flower product characteristics, and consumer preferences, as well as the impact of flower language on consumers' purchase intention, and willingness to pay, and to summarize flower language and flower application occasions. This study adopts purposive sampling and conducts an online questionnaire survey to investigate the flower consumption habits and applicability of flower language among Taiwanese consumers. Results show that in Taiwan's flower consumption market, consumers aged 20-29 have the lowest purchase frequency and amount of flower products, while consumers aged 45-49 have the highest consumption amount and frequency; consumers with higher personal monthly income have the highest frequency, amount and willingness to pay for flower products. In addition, consumers' preferences for flower commodity characteristics are heterogeneous, especially in terms of size, flower language, and price. There are far more positive words than negative words in the application of flower language. The symbol of flower language is mostly based on literature, legends and allusions, which are not necessarily related to color. Providing a list of flower language functions and applicable flowers can enhance consumers' understanding of flowers; In addition, because many flowers have the same flower language, more than one flower is suitable for various flower use occasions, and consumers can choose the product according to their personal preference and flower production period. In the three flower occasions of festival flowers, social flowers, and weekday flowers, providing flower language and applicable flower collection lists can increase consumers' purchase intention of flower products, increase the value of flower products, and further improve consumers' willingness to pay in some flowers. On the whole, consumers' attention to flower language, color preference, attitude, and behavioral intentions will affect their purchase intention of flower products and the price they are willing to pay, and the degree of influence will vary with different commodities and demographic variables. Men are more inclined to think that the flower language can express the uniqueness of flowers and personal emotions, and the flower language is more likely to affect men's perception of flowers and their purchase intention, females are more willing to buy flower products than males consumers. To conclude, it is recommended that when selling flower products, the flower language can be used as the advertising material of flower products to enhance the connection between flower products and life, so as to reach more diverse consumer groups, then segment consumers into the market, tailoring marketing strategies for consumers who do not have stable flower buying behavior. Provide them with affordable flower products, establish diversified flower purchasing channels, and then expand flower consumer groups and promote Taiwan's flower consumption market.en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2023-03-19T22:51:35Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
U0001-2907202218134500.pdf: 4229389 bytes, checksum: eb47cdefffcd29099d7b9afaf3898427 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2022
en
dc.description.tableofcontents摘要 i Abstract iii 目錄 vi 表目錄 viii 圖目錄 xi 第一章 前言 1 一、研究背景與動機 1 二、研究架構 3 三、研究步驟 4 第二章 前人研究 5 一、臺灣花卉消費市場 5 二、花語 6 三、消費行為 8 四、花卉行銷 9 第三章 臺灣花卉消費習慣調查 10 一、前言 (Introduction) 11 二、材料方法 (Materials and Methods) 12 三、結果 (Results) 13 四、討論 (Discussion) 18 第四章 花語適用場合之探討 36 一、前言 (Introduction) 37 二、材料與方法 (Materials and Methods) 38 三、結果 (Results) 40 四、討論 (Discussion) 45 第五章 花語對消費行為的影響 65 一、前言(Introduction) 66 二、材料與方法(Materials and Methods) 67 三、結果(Results) 75 四、討論(Discussion) 84 第六章 結論 118 一、研究結論 118 二、研究限制 120 三、研究建議 121 參考文獻(References) 124 附錄(Appendix) 132 附錄一 臺灣花卉消費習慣問卷 132 附錄二 花語適用性問卷 149 附錄三 臺灣常見花卉的東西方花語整理 157
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.subject願付價格zh_TW
dc.subject消費意願zh_TW
dc.subject花卉行銷zh_TW
dc.subject花卉市場zh_TW
dc.subject花語zh_TW
dc.subjectflower marketingen
dc.subjectflower marketen
dc.subjectflower languageen
dc.subjectpurchase intentionen
dc.subjectwillingness to payen
dc.title臺灣花卉消費市場與花語適用性之關聯性研究zh_TW
dc.titleStudy on the Relationship between the Market of Flower Consumption and Applicability of Flower Language in Taiwanen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear110-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee黃麗君(Li-Chun Huang),林俊寬(Jiun-Kuan Lin),吳俊偉(Chun-Wei Wu)
dc.subject.keyword花卉市場,花語,消費意願,願付價格,花卉行銷,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordflower market,flower language,purchase intention,willingness to pay,flower marketing,en
dc.relation.page190
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU202201890
dc.rights.note同意授權(限校園內公開)
dc.date.accepted2022-08-02
dc.contributor.author-college生物資源暨農學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept園藝暨景觀學系zh_TW
dc.date.embargo-lift2022-08-03-
顯示於系所單位:園藝暨景觀學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
U0001-2907202218134500.pdf
授權僅限NTU校內IP使用(校園外請利用VPN校外連線服務)
4.13 MBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved