請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/84911完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 王衍智(Yanzhi Wang) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ping-Rong Lu | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 盧品蓉 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-03-19T22:32:16Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2022-09-26 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2022 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2022-08-24 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Arnould, R. J. (1969). Conglomerate growth and public policy. Economics of Conglomerate Growth, Oregon State University Department of Agricultural Economics, Corvallis, OR, 72-80. Ahern, K. R., & Harford, J. (2014). The importance of industry links in merger waves. The Journal of Finance, 69(2), 527-576. Appio, F. P., De Luca, L. M., Morgan, R., & Martini, A. (2019). Patent portfolio diversity and firm profitability: A question of specialization or diversification?. Journal of Business Research, 101, 255-267. Blonigen, B. A., & Taylor, C. T. (2000). R&D intensity and acquisitions in high‐technology industries: evidence from the US electronic and electrical equipment industries. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 48(1), 47-70. Breschi, S., Lissoni, F., & Malerba, F. (2003). Knowledge-relatedness in firm technological diversification. Research Policy, 32(1), 69-87. Bena, J., & Li, K. (2014). Corporate innovations and mergers and acquisitions. The Journal of Finance, 69(5), 1923-1960. Cassiman, B., Colombo, M. G., Garrone, P., & Veugelers, R. (2005). The impact of M&A on the R&D process: An empirical analysis of the role of technological-and market-relatedness. Research Policy, 34(2), 195-220. Cloodt, M., Hagedoorn, J., & Van Kranenburg, H. (2006). Mergers and acquisitions: Their effect on the innovative performance of companies in high-tech industries. Research Policy, 35(5), 642-654. Coase, R. H. (1937). The nature of the firm. economica, 4(16), 386-405. Ernst, H., & Vitt, J. (2000). The influence of corporate acquisitions on the behaviour of key inventors. R&D Management, 30(2), 105-120. Gort, M. (1962). Front matter, diversification and integration in American industry. In Diversification and integration in American Industry. Greenwood Press. Gort, M. (1969). An economic disturbance theory of mergers. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 83(4), 624-642. Garcia-Vega, M. (2006). Does technological diversification promote innovation?: An empirical analysis for European firms. Research Policy, 35(2), 230-246. Hitt, M. A., Hoskisson, R. E., Ireland, R. D., & Harrison, J. S. (1991). Effects of acquisitions on R&D inputs and outputs. Academy of Management journal, 34(3), 693-706. Harford, J. (2005). What drives merger waves?. Journal of financial economics, 77(3), 529-560. Kallunki, J. P., Pyykkö, E., & Laamanen, T. (2009). Stock market valuation, profitability and R&D spending of the firm: the effect of technology mergers and acquisitions. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 36(7‐8), 838-862. Leten, B., Belderbos, R., & Van Looy, B. (2007). Technological diversification, coherence, and performance of firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 24(6), 567-579. Lin, J. C., & Wang, Y. (2016). The R&D premium and takeover risk. The Accounting Review, 91(3), 955-971. Markham, J. W. (1973). Conglomerate Enterprise and Economic Performance. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. Nam, J., Ottoo, R. E., & Thornton Jr, J. H. (2003). The effect of managerial incentives to bear risk on corporate capital structure and R&D investment. Financial Review, 38(1), 77-101. Phillips, G. M., & Zhdanov, A. (2013). R&D and the incentives from merger and acquisition activity. The Review of Financial Studies, 26(1), 34-78. Rhodes‐Kropf, M., & Viswanathan, S. (2004). Market valuation and merger waves. The Journal of Finance, 59(6), 2685-2718. Rhodes–Kropf, M., Robinson, D. T., & Viswanathan, S. (2005). Valuation waves and merger activity: The empirical evidence. Journal of financial Economics, 77(3), 561-603. Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (2003). Stock market driven acquisitions. Journal of financial Economics, 70(3), 295-311. Sevilir, M., & Tian, X. (2012). Acquiring innovation. AFA 2012 Chicago Meetings. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/84911 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 公司經理人在進行決策時,公司的創新能力是重要的考量因素之一,因此過去許多文獻都在討論創新對公司決策的影響。衡量創新的指標除了研發費用、研發密度外,專利多樣性亦為衡量一間公司的創新能力的指標之一。經理人為了使公司的獲利更高、擴大市佔率可能會做出不同的決策,其中一個便是併購的決策。併購發生的原因可能是為取得目標公司的技術或市場,因此過去有許多研究在討論研發支出、研發密度等創新指標與併購之間的關聯。過往的財務文獻甚少探討專利多樣性與公司決策之間的關聯,然專利多樣性卻是衡量公司創新的另一個重要指標,且公司的創新研發係多樣化或集中與公司的決策有著密切的關聯,因此本研究旨在探討專利多樣性與併購之間的關聯。實證結果表明,當公司的專利多樣性越低 (專利越集中),企業成為目標公司的機率越高。其中的原因可能是因為當公司的專利集中度越高,其單一專利的價值就會越高,因此越有可能被需要該專利的公司所併購。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Innovation is one of the most important considerations when a CEO makes decisions, so many studies have discussed the impact of innovation on the CEO making decisions in the past. In addition to R&D expenses and R&D density, which can measure a company's ability to innovate, the diversity of patents is also an indicator to measure a company's innovation ability. Managers make many decisions to increase company profit or expand market share such as mergers and acquisitions (M&A). Mergers and acquisitions (M&A) may occur to acquire the technology or market shares of the target company, so many studies have discussed the relationship between innovation such as R&D expenditure and R&D density and M&A in the past. The past financial literature seldom discussed the relationship between the diversity of patents and managers making decisions. The diversification or concentration of a company's innovation is highly related to the manager making decisions, so the diversity of patents is another important indicator for measuring corporate innovation, therefore, this study wants to know the relationship between the diversity of patents and mergers and acquisitions. The empirical results show that when the company's patent diversity is lower (patent concentration is more concentrated), the probability of the company becoming a target company is higher. We suggest that when a company's patent concentration is higher, the value of its single patent will be higher. So, when the company's patent concentration is higher, it will more likely be a target company. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2023-03-19T22:32:16Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 U0001-0607202221515500.pdf: 1521853 bytes, checksum: bf3d5fcdb7a6626891ec4610d9a59fbb (MD5) Previous issue date: 2022 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書 i 致謝 ii 摘要 iii Abstract iv 目錄 v 圖目錄 vi 表目錄 vii 第一章:前言 1 第二章:文獻回顧 4 第三章:研究假說與模型 11 第四章:資料與研究方法 16 第一節:資料 16 第二節:研究方法 17 第三節:變數定義 18 第五章:研究結果 20 第一節:基本統計量 20 第二節:主要結果 26 第三節:子樣本分析 29 一、 第四次併購浪潮:1981~1989 29 二、 第五次併購浪潮:1990~2018 29 三、 以併購浪潮區分子樣本的小結 30 四、 每3年為一個群組,檢定專利多樣性與併購機率的關係 31 第六章:結論與建議 34 第七章:參考文獻 35 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 專利多樣性 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 併購 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 研發密度 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 目標公司 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | R&D intensity | en |
| dc.subject | diversity of patent | en |
| dc.subject | merger and acquisition (M&A) | en |
| dc.subject | target company | en |
| dc.title | 專利多樣性與併購機率 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Diversity of patent and probability of merger and acquisition | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 110-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 何耕宇(Keng-Yu Ho),張景宏(Ching-Hung Chang) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 專利多樣性,併購,目標公司,研發密度, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | diversity of patent,merger and acquisition (M&A),target company,R&D intensity, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 43 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202201314 | |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(限校園內公開) | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2022-08-25 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 財務金融學研究所 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2022-09-26 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 財務金融學系 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| U0001-0607202221515500.pdf 授權僅限NTU校內IP使用(校園外請利用VPN校外連線服務) | 1.49 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
